http://surgerybook.net/
common in surgical ICU patients. Nearly 85% of those who remain in the SICU after a week and over
40% overall will be transfused, many of whom are not actively bleeding.83 It was reflexive practice a
decade or so ago to prescribe a transfusion for ICU patients whose hemoglobin levels fell below 10 g/dL
with at least two units being administered. However, packed cell transfusion may not dramatically
improve oxygen delivery, particularly in situations where the oxygen dissociation curve has been shifted
to the left, as with decreased 2,3-diphosphoglycerate concentrations (Table 10-8). In addition, in many
patient populations, transfusion of packed cells has been associated with increased infections and organ
failure. The Transfusion requirements in Critical Care (TRICC) trial published in 199984 provided data
to question the universal practice of red cell transfusion. This multi-institutional trial of patients in
Canadian ICUs was designed as a noninferiority trial comparing a restrictive transfusion strategy, aimed
at maintaining a hemoglobin level greater than 7 to 9 g/dL, to a liberal one, targeting a level of 10 to
12. Hebert and colleagues demonstrated no difference in mortality between the groups, the primary
outcome measured. Although patients with significant cardiac history were excluded a priori, nearly 300
were studied, and there was no outcome difference in this group either.85
Nonetheless, despite widespread dissemination of this landmark article, transfusion practice did not
widely change in many surgical ICU patients since and there is still a sense that older, cardiac, actively
bleeding, neurosurgical, and septic patients should be excluded from restrictive transfusion practices.
However, subsequent studies have further questioned this dogma. A large propensity matched study
analyzed the effect of transfusion on ICU patients who were not actively bleeding. It revealed that
nontransfused patients (including those with a significant cardiac history) had a lower hospital mortality
and incidence of infection and acute kidney injury.86 The RELIEVE trial was a multicenter randomized
controlled trial of ventilated ICU patients over the age of 55, including one-third with ischemic cardiac
disease. Those in the restrictive group received almost a quarter fewer transfusions and had over a 30%
lower mortality rate.87 A meta-analysis of the effect of blood transfusion during myocardial infarction
noted that the therapy was associated with a relative risk of 2.91 for mortality and 2.04 for a
subsequent MI with a number to treat of 8.88 Further, a British propensity-matched study of cardiac
surgery patients revealed odds ratios of 3.8 and 3.5, respectively, for infection and ischemia after
transfusion and ratios of 6.69 and 1.32, respectively, for 30-day and 1-year mortality in transfused
patients.89 This risk of transfusion in cardiac surgery patients is apparent even with administration of
small-volume (i.e., one or two units of packed cells) transfusions.90 A large, randomized controlled trial
of cardiac surgery patients over the age of 18 undergoing a bypass or valve replacement revealed no
change in 30-day all-cause mortality or morbidity utilizing a transfusion trigger of 8 versus 10 g/dL of
hemoglobin.91 Further, a large single center study randomized those with severe acute upper
gastrointestinal bleeding – almost 75% variceal – to a transfusion target of 7 versus 9 g/dL of
hemoglobin. Nearly half of those in the restrictive group did not receive a transfusion and the mean
time to endoscopy was 6 hours. The restrictive group had a 45% relative reduction in mortality and all
adverse events, mostly confined to those in Child’s groups A and B (there was no difference in those in
Child’s C classification group). This study reinforced the findings of a previous observation study that a
liberal transfusion target in active upper gastrointestinal bleeding doubled the risk of rebleeding and
increased mortality by 28%,92 presumably by promoting “popping the clot.” In a randomized clinical
trial of patients with traumatic brain injury, a hemoglobin target of 10 compared to 7 g/dL was
associated with no improvement in neurologic outcome at 6 months but a higher incidence of adverse
events including thromboembolism.93 Finally, in a multicenter, RCT of septic patients, a hemoglobin
target of 7 g/dL with transfusion of leukoreduced cells was not associated with difference in 90-day
hospital mortality of adverse events compared to 1 of 9 g/dL.94
Table 10-8 Factors Altering the Oxygen Dissociation Curve
Although administration of both erythropoietin95 and intravenous iron96 would seem sound practice
316
http://surgerybook.net/
to mitigate against transfusion and the harmful effects thereof, in clinical practice in the SICU, neither
has been effective in dramatically impacting transfusions or outcomes. It may be most prudent to “ride
out” the anemia seen in ICU patients, minimize unnecessary blood draws, and improve oxygen delivery
by other means (although they, too, have not afforded improved outcomes).
METABOLISM AND NUTRITION
Classic texts on surgical nutrition emphasize the metabolic and hormonal differences between the states
of starvation, one of decreased metabolic rate, and that of stress, one of increased metabolism driven by
so-called stress hormones. In reality, many surgical and trauma patients experience stress after a fast,
although the use of early nutrition in almost all has largely prevented this.
In starvation, fat oxidation is the principle energy source after glycogen stores are exhausted within
24 hours. Patients turn to gluconeogenesis (particularly in cells that are obligate glucose users such as
neurons and red blood cells) for fuel, resulting in increased free fatty acids, ketones, and glycerol. This
amplified gluconeogenesis results in exhaustion of amino acid levels and protein wasting. Eventually,
glucose levels drop as does insulin. Stress hormones, including cortisol and catecholamines, promote
protein catabolism. As glucose is used up, a switch is made to fat metabolism with the inability to keep
up via gluconeogenesis.
Critically ill patients are in a catabolic stress state with a systemic inflammatory response.
Malnutrition in critically ill patients leads to worse outcomes; inability to wean from the ventilator,
pressure ulcers, and increased risk of infectious complications. For these reasons, it is critical that ICU
patients undergo assessment and adequate support of their nutritional status. Goals of nutrition support
are to preserve lean body mass, maintain immune function, and avert metabolic complications.1,97
Metabolic Requirements and Assessment
Metabolic requirements for ICU patients for both calories and protein needs are based on ideal body
weight. Equations, such as the Harris–Benedict calculation, can assist in determination of caloric
administration and are based on the patient’s baseline energy expenditure, referred to as the basal
metabolic rate (BMR) and/or basal energy expenditure (BEE). BMR is the estimated rate of energy used
by the body at rest and is only sufficient for the functioning of vital organs. The BEE varies with age,
lean body mass, and sex. In most circumstances, ICU patients should receive 25 to 30 kcal/kg/day and
1.2 to 2.5 g/kg/day of protein (highest in stressed burn patients). In fact, hypocaloric, high-protein
diets may be best for many, if not most, ICU patients. Starting critically ill patients at 8 to 10
kcal/kg/day and attempting to achieve goal nutrition of 25 to 30 kcal/kg/day within a week is
optimal.98
The most important nutritional assessment of our ICU patients is the least high tech – that is, a careful
history and physical examination documenting diet status, weight loss, and the nature of the operation
or trauma. We often supplement this with quantitative assessment of protein and caloric adequacy.
These include simple laboratory tests and more complicated evaluations. A variety of visceral proteins
with relatively short half-lives have been assayed for their relation to protein status. These include
prealbumin, transferrin, and retinol-binding protein (with half-lives of 2, 8, and 10 days, respectively)
as opposed to albumin whose half-life is 21 days. However, even prealbumin levels may respond to
factors other than nutritional status, including ongoing inflammation. The most accurate assessment is
via indirect calorimetry. This allows for the direct measurement of oxygen consumption (VO2
). It is best
determined in those on stable ventilator settings with an inspired oxygen fraction of less than 65% and
no airway leaks. However, use of indirect calorimetry to guide nutritional support has not been
demonstrated to result in improved outcomes to justify its expense.
Energy Sources
Carbohydrates, fat, and protein each contain a unique amount of calories per gram and respiratory
quotients (RQ), a ratio of CO2 consumption (VCO2
) over oxygen consumption (VO2
). Ratios that exceed
one will result in the body’s need to eliminate additional CO2
, which can be of consequence in those on
ventilator support with lung disease. The goal of ICU nutrition is to provide energy from carbohydrate
and fat sources, so that exogenous proteins can be used for anabolism and not catabolism. This principle
is the protein sparing effect of carbohydrate and fat administration. Less than 500 kcal/day are protein
sparing, although in most instances, we provide many more calories with traditional ICU nutrition.
317
http://surgerybook.net/
Carbohydrates provide 3.4 kcal/g and have the highest RQ of 1.0. Thus, excess carbohydrate
calories can result in prolonged ventilator needs. An RQ of greater than one is seen with glycogen
storage. The ICU patient should be provided with 5 to 6 g/kg/day of carbohydrates.
Fat provides 9.0 kcal/g with an RQ of 0.7. ICU patients should receive 1 g/kg/day or less of fat. Fat
deficiency used to be fairly common in ICU patients before early and adequate nutrition. Deficiency can
result in anemia, thrombocytopenia, respiratory distress, and rash. Excess fat can promote cholestasis
and fatty liver resulting in coagulopathy. In fact, it is possible to administer nearly all of one’s
nonprotein calories as carbohydrates, providing essential fatty acids are administered. However, this
would result in an increased RQ (with ventilatory consequences) and issues of glycemic control. Fatty
acids exist in two varieties, omega-three and omega-six. Omega-three fatty acids are derived from
linolenic acid, found in fatty fish such as salmon, and are less pathogenic than omega-six fatty acids
derived from linoleic acid. In stress, after the body exhausts its supply of carbohydrates, it relies on
lipolysis which lowers the RQ (until the supply of fatty acids is also consumed and proteolysis occurs).
Protein delivers 4.0 kcal/g with an RQ of 0.8. Essential amino acids cannot be synthesized
endogenously and must be provided in the diet and include: methionine, threonine, tryptophan, valine,
phenylalanine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, and histidine. Diets specialized for those with renal failure
deliver their protein in the form of essential amino acids. Semiessential amino acids such as arginine and
glutamine are difficult for the body to manufacture in times of stress and are obligately utilized by
certain cell types. Protein is the important component of nutrition due to the body’s obligate synthetic
needs. We are able to measure the efficacy of protein nutrition by assaying nitrogen balance – a balance
sheet between protein in and nitrogen out measured in the urine. This, of course, requires that we
remember that a gram of protein contains 6.25 g of nitrogen. Severely burned patients can lose 25 g N
(125 g pro) daily. In certain conditions, such as sepsis, we may not be able to provide enough protein to
avoid negative nitrogen balance.
Vitamins and minerals. Contemporary supplemental nutrition contains sufficient trace elements and
vitamins to make deficiency in ICU patients a thing of the past in most instances. A resurgence in this
has occurred with the care of bariatric patients and the deficiencies they experience post bypass, most
notably of thiamine. Interesting to note, virtually all enteral formulae contain vitamin K – some in
rather large amounts – so anticoagulation may be difficult (Table 10-9).
The nutritional support of the malnourished and nourished patient employs different strategies to
optimize outcome. Malnourished patients may benefit from preoperative nutritional support for at least
7 days that can be delivered enterally, if possible. Well-nourished patients should have nutrition
resumed within 48 hours; however, it is safe, if not wise to delay parenteral nutrition for 5 to 7 days if
the enteral route is not possible. There is much controversy and regional variability regarding this issue
with the Europeans preferring earlier initiation of parenteral nutrition, as will be discussed below.
Enteral Nutrition
9 In general, enteral nutrition should be used early and often in ICU patients. Standard enteral formulas
include fatty acids, carbohydrates, protein, vitamins, minerals, and micronutrients. A standard formula
is isotonic to serum and has a calorie density of 1 kcal/mL. A concentrated formula is used in patients
who may benefit from low volume nutrition. Concentrated formula is hyperosmolar with a calorie
density of 1.2 to 2.0 kcal/mL. There are specific formulations that address types of organ dysfunction.
So-called pulmonary formulations are low in carbohydrates; renal formulas are concentrated with
essential amino acids and hepatic formulas contain branched chain amino acids. Further, enteral feeds
are either polymeric or elemental – that is, broken down to the basic building blocks of the energy
substrates – proteins as free amino acids, fats as medium chain triglycerides, and carbohydrates as
oligosaccharides at a calorie concentrations of 1 to 1.5 kcal/mL. Elemental feeds may be useful in the
stressed patient as they require minimal intraluminal digestion. Elemental formulas should be
considered in patients with nutrition absorption disorders and those that fail to tolerate standard enteral
nutrition.
Table 10-9 Vitamin Deficiencies
318
http://surgerybook.net/
There are several complications related to enteral nutrition in the ICU, the most significant of which
is aspiration. To decrease the aspiration risk, the ICU staff should maintain head-of-bed elevation at 45
degrees or greater and consider promotility agents. Regular assay of gastric residuals may not decrease
aspiration risk.99
Parenteral nutrition requires the insertion of a central catheter or a centrally directed peripheral
one. As such, the complications of parenteral nutrition include the risks of catheter insertion and
infection in addition to the metabolic consequences of feeding (such as hyperglycemia) that can also be
seen with enteral nutrition. Parenteral nutrition can be prepared in standard or concentrated
formulations depending upon the glucose with added amino acids and fat. There may be evidence that
hypocaloric formulas with limitation of fat early on are beneficial.97
Immunonutrition
In addition to use of omega-three fatty acids, there are other ingredients that may be helpful to use in
the stressed patient. In small, early nonrandomized trials, semiessential amino acids arginine and
glutamine have been shown to be beneficial and the use of high-protein/low-calorie strategies may be
most optimal, particularly using branched chain amino acids. There was thought to be a notable
exception to this strategy – arginine, in particular, was not advised in the patient who is already
infected.100 Arginine is metabolized to nitric oxide which may increase permeability, hemodynamic
instability, and translocation in septic patients. However, this may be mitigated by increased production
of arginase in septic patients. Increasing literature actually supports increased perfusion by giving
arginine in sepsis.101,102 Thus, arginine administration is likely safe in sepsis, but the preferred dose is
still of debate. Glutamine is rapidly depleted from muscle stores and thought to be important in
minimizing translocation as it assists in maintaining gut barrier function as an enterocyte fuel. A
hypocaloric, high-protein strategy appears to be most beneficial with a calorie to nitrogen ratio of 100–
150:1 compare to the more traditional 300:1. However, large randomized trials discussed below
question the clinical efficacy of immunonutrition.
Controversial Issues in ICU Nutrition
Delivery of Early Enteral Nutrition
Most critically ill patients are unable to ingest enteral nutrition and have a need for access to the enteric
track. There is no compelling evidence that enteral feeds need be delivered in a specific location – that
is, there is little data to suggest that postpyloric feeding results in lower aspiration rates or in better
food tolerance with higher caloric provision.103 Gastric tube feeding is the most common method to
deliver enteric nutrition. Via an orogastric or nasogastric route, sump tubes or smaller-caliber feeding
tubes are placed into the stomach with confirmation by abdominal x-ray. Surgically placed gastric
feeding tubes, whether placed percutaneous or via an open procedure, can also be used for a more longterm enteral nutrition access. Postpyloric tube feeding should be considered in patients who cannot
tolerate gastric enteral nutrition or patients who have undergone surgical procedures that have altered
anatomy. Placement of a postpyloric tube can be done with blind placement via the nasal or oral route.
These tubes may also be placed via open surgical procedures with a single tube inserted directly in the
intestine distal to the pylorus or with a tube with a port to drain the stomach and a distal port to deliver
enteral nutrition into the duodenum. Postpyloric placement of enteral nutrition access has no benefit
over gastric feeding access in terms of energy delivered or rate of aspiration pneumonia, and so it is
recommended to proceed with enteral nutrition via the gastric route.103
319
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع