Translate

Search This Blog

الترجمة

Search This Blog

str

pep

str

2

str

z

2

str

z

coinad

10/22/25

 


increase in brain pH suppresses the stimulus for hyperventilation unless severe hypoxia is present. In

contrast, chronic hypoxia results in hyperventilation even with mildly decreased PCO2 because brain pH

is lowered by metabolic compensation. The two most common causes of hypoxia resulting in respiratory

alkalosis are pulmonary disease and exposure to high altitudes.

Clinical Features

Chronic respiratory alkalosis is usually asymptomatic because compensatory mechanisms are successful

in maintaining pH close to normal. Acute respiratory alkalosis may cause sensations of breathlessness,

dizziness, and nervousness and can result in circumoral and extremity paresthesias, altered levels of

consciousness, and tetany. These signs are related to decreased cerebral blood flow secondary to the

decreased PCO2 and decreased ionized calcium concentration secondary to the increased blood pH.

Compensatory Mechanisms

Tissue buffering is the initial response to a decrease in PCO2

. Red blood cells provide one-third of the

buffering. Consumption of bicarbonate results from cellular liberation of H+. The magnitude of tissue

buffering is weak compared with renal compensation. This is accomplished not by increasing

bicarbonate excretion but by decreasing net acid excretion, namely ammonia. Acute compensation is not

as strong as chronic compensation, which takes at least 3 days to occur.

Acute compensation: Decrease serum HCO3

- by 2 mEq/L per 10 mm Hg reduction in PCO2

Chronic compensation: Decrease serum HCO3

- by 4 to 5 mEq/L per 10 mm Hg reduction in PCO2

Treatment

The underlying stimulus for the hyperventilation should be addressed. The cause of hypoxemia should

be determined and corrected. In acute symptomatic respiratory alkalosis, rebreathing or breathing 5%

CO2

temporarily relieves symptoms. If the condition is secondary to mechanical ventilation, decreasing

tidal volume or respiratory rate should result in resolution of respiratory alkalosis.

Respiratory Acidosis

Respiratory acidosis is defined by a decrease in extracellular pH from a primary increase in PCO2

, due

to inadequate ventilation. Causes of hypoventilation include CNS depression, impaired pulmonary

mechanics, airway obstruction, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In addition,

inappropriate ventilator settings may result in respiratory acidosis in patients on mechanical ventilation.

Clinical Features

The magnitude of clinical manifestations depends on the chronicity and rate of development of

respiratory acidosis. Acute increases result in cerebral acidosis, manifested by drowsiness, restlessness,

and tremor, as well as stupor or coma in more severe cases. Cerebral vasodilation occurs in response to

acidosis, resulting in increased cerebral blood flow. This may, in turn, result in increased intracranial

blood pressure, headache, and papilledema. Systemic acidosis results in peripheral vasodilatation,

depressed cardiac contractility, and insensitivity to catecholamines.

366

http://surgerybook.net/

Figure 11-8. Acid–base nomogram. Shown are the 95% confidence limits of the normal respiratory and metabolic compensations

for primary acid–base disturbances. (Reproduced with permission from Cogan MG, Rector FC Jr. Acid–base disturbances. In:

Brenner BM, Rector FC Jr, eds. The Kidney. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1986:473.)

Compensatory Mechanisms

Increased pCO2

results in increased H2CO3

, which dissociates into H+ and HCO3

-. Cellular exchange of

Na+ and K+ for H+ allows the reaction to continue in this direction with increased extracellular

bicarbonate. This tissue buffering is accomplished within minutes. Persistently elevated PCO2 also

stimulates increased renal acid excretion, primarily the chloride salt of ammonia, and results in

increased renal generation of HCO3

-. Full renal compensation occurs over 3 to 5 days.

Acute compensation: 1 mEq/L HCO3

- per 10 mm Hg PCO2

Chronic compensation ~4 mEq/L for every 10 mm Hg PCO2

Treatment

Treatment should be directed to the underlying cause of hypoventilation. Endotracheal intubation to

achieve adequate ventilation is paramount to the treatment of acute respiratory acidosis of any cause. In

select cases of respiratory acidosis, namely patients with COPD, noninvasive positive pressure

ventilation (i.e., CPAP/BiPAP) has proven effective. However, patients must be able to protect their

airway and have no major concern for aspiration (i.e., not appropriate in the setting of a bowel

obstruction). Furthermore, there must be close follow-up to ensure the acidosis is resolving.

The treatment of chronic, compensated respiratory acidosis may be complicated by the accompanying

hypoxemia. In chronic hypercapnia, the central chemoreceptors may be insensitive, and the

accompanying hypoxemia may supply the main respiratory drive through stimulation of peripheral

chemoreceptors. In such patients, complete correction of the hypoxemia may further suppress

respiration and worsen the respiratory acidosis. In addition, PCO2 should not be normalized rapidly.

Equilibration of cerebral bicarbonate concentration lags behind systemic changes. Thus, even if PCO2

is

normal, cellular and cerebral metabolic alkalosis may develop.

Mixed Acid–Base Disorders

Combinations of two or more of the four primary acid–base disorders may occur and should be

suspected when blood pH approaches normal despite abnormal PCO2 and [HCO3

-], or when

compensatory changes appear to be either excessive or inadequate (Fig. 11-8). Familiarity with the

acid–base disorders associated with various clinical situations and the expectation of mixed

abnormalities allows appropriate interpretation of arterial blood gases and serum electrolyte

determinations.

References

1. Forbes G. Body composition: overview. J Nutr 1999;129(1):270S–272S.

2. Briggs JP, Sawaya BE, Schnerman J. Disorders of salt balance. In: Kokko JP, Tannen RL, eds. Fluid

and Electrolytes. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1990:70.

3. Thompson CA, Tatro DL, Ludwig DA, et al. Baroreflex responses to acute changes in blood volume

in humans. Am J Physiol 1990;259:R792–R798.

4. Le Fevre P. Gibbs-Donnan Effect: A Computer Simulation.

http://www.philippelefevre.com/icu_medicine/gibbs_donnan. Accessed January 5, 2015.

5. Stockand JD. New ideas about aldosterone signaling in epithelia. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol

2002;51:F559–F576.

6. Boland DG, Abraham WT. Natriuretic peptides in heart failure. Congest Heart Fail 1998;4:23–33.

7. Falcao LM, Fausto P, Luciano R, et al. BNP and ANP as diagnostic and predictive markers in heart

failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Sys 2004;5:121–

129.

8. Schrier R, Abraham W. Mechanisms of disease: hormones and hemodynamics in heart failure. N

Engl J Med 1999;341:577–585.

9. Wait RB, Kahng KU. Renal failure complicating obstructive jaundice. Am J Surg 1989;157:256–263.

367

http://surgerybook.net/

10. Naicker S, Bhoola KD. Endothelins: vasoactive modulators of renal function in health and disease.

Pharmacol Ther 2001;90(1):61–68.

11. Roland CB, Aihua D, Mark L, et al. The complex role of nitric oxide in the regulation of glomerular

filtration. Kidney Int 2002;61:782–785.

12. Ruttmann TG, James MF, Lombard EM. Haemodilution induced enhancement of coagulation is

attenuated in vitro by restoring antithrombin III to predilution concentrations. Anaesth Intensive

Care 2001;29:489–493.

13. Ng KF, Lam CC, Chan LC. In vivo effect of haemodilution with saline on coagulation: a randomized

controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:475–480.

14. Ruttmann TG, James MF, Finlayson J. Effects on coagulation of intravenous crystalloid or colloid in

patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:226–230.

15. De Lorenzo C, Calatzis A, Welsch U, et al. Fibrinogen concentrate reverses dilutional coagulopathy

induced in vitro by saline but not by hydroxyethyl starch 6%. Anesth Analg 2006;102:1194–2000.

16. Koustova E, Standon K, Gushchin V, et al. Effects of lactated Ringer’s solution on human

leukocytes. J Trauma 2002;53:872–878.

17. Hanneman L, Reinhart K, Korrel R, et al. Hypertonic saline in stabilized hyperdynamic sepsis. Shock

1996;5:130–134.

18. Wade CE, Kramer GC, Grady JJ, et al. Efficacy of 7.5% saline and 6% dextran-70 in treating

trauma. A meta-analysis of controlled clinical studies. Surgery 1997;122:609–616.

19. Doyle J, Davis D, Hoyt D. The use of hypertonic saline in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. J

Trauma 2001;50:367–383.

20. Rizoli SB, Rhind SG, Shek PN, et al. The immunomodulatory effects of hypertonic saline

resuscitation in patients sustaining traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Ann Surg 2006;243:47–57.

21. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, et al. The SAFE Study Investigators. A comparison of albumin and

saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2247–2256.

22. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Reinhart K, et al. Is albumin administration in the acutely ill associated with

increased mortality? Results of the SOAP study. Crit Care 2005;9:R745–R754.

23. Greg M. Conflicting clinical trial data: a lesson from albumin. Crit Care 2005; 9:649–650.

24. Alexey AS, Raili S, Anne HK, et al. Rapidly degradable hydroxyethyl starch solutions impair blood

coagulation after cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Anesth Analg 2009;108:30–36.

25. Martin G, Bennett-Guerrero E, Wakeling H, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of

thrombelastographic coagulation profile in patients receiving lactated Ringer’s solution, 6%

hetastarch in a balanced-saline vehicle, or 6% hydroxyethyl starch in saline during major surgery. J

Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002;16:441–446.

26. Omar MN, Shouk TA, Khaleq MA. Activity of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis during and after

hydroxyethyl starch (HES) colloidal volume replacement. Clin Biochem 1999;32:269–274.

27. Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB, et al.; 6S Trial Group; Scandinavian Critical Care Trials, Group.

Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2012;367:124–

134.

28. Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in

intensive care. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1901–1911.

29. Public Workshop: Risks and Benefits of Hydroxyethyl Starch Solutions. Vaccines, Blood & Biologics

(U.S. Food and Drug Administration), September, 2012.

30. Solutions for infusion containing hydroxyethyl starch: Hydroxyethyl-starch solutions (HES) should

no longer be used in patients with sepsis or burn injuries or in critically ill patients. PRAC

recommendations, European Medicines Agency, October 10, 2013.

31. Dellinger R, Phillip L, Mitchell M, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee

including the Pediatric Subgroup (February 2013). Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International

Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2012;41(2):580–

637.

32. Perel P, Roberts I. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD000567.

33. Allison KP, Gosling P, Jones S, et al. Randomized trial of hydroxyethyl starch versus gelatine for

trauma resuscitation. J Trauma 1999;47:1114–1121.

368

http://surgerybook.net/

34. Russell WJ, Fenwick DG. Anaphylaxis to Haemaccel and cross reactivity to Gelofusin. Anaesth

Intensive Care 2002;30:481–483.

35. Bernard AC, Moore EE, et al.; PolyHeme Study Group. Postinjury resuscitation with human

polymerized hemoglobin prolongs early survival: a post hoc analysis. J Trauma 2011;70(5

Suppl):S34–S37.

36. Fleck A, Raines G, Hawker F, et al. Increased vascular permeability: a major cause of

hypoalbuminaemia in disease and injury. Lancet 1985;1:781–784.

37. Rodriguez HJ, Domenici R, Diroll A, et al. Assessment of dry weight by monitoring changes in

blood volume during hemodialysis using Crit-Line. Kidney Int 2005;68(2):854–861.

38. McGee WT. A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamics using stroke volume and

stroke volume variation: physiologic optimization program. J Intensive Care Med 2009;24(6):352–

360.

39. Androgue HJ, Madias NE. Hyponatremia. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1581–1589.

40. Katz MA. Hyperglycemia-induced hyponatremia—calculation of expected serum sodium depression.

N Engl J Med 1973;289:843–844.

41. Ellison DH, Berl T. Clinical practice. The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. N Engl J Med

2007;356:2064–2072.

42. Scherr L, Ogden DA, Mead AW, et al. Management of hyperkalemia with a cation-exchange resin. N

Engl J Med 1961;264:115–119.

43. Magnus Nzerue C, Jackson E. Intractable life-threatening hyperkalaemia in a diabetic patient.

Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000;15:113–114.

44. Cooper MS, Gittoes NJ. Diagnosis and management of hypocalcaemia. BMJ 2008;336:1298–1302.

45. Hannan FM, Thakker RV. Investigating hypocalcaemia. BMJ 2013;346:f2213.

46. Tohme JF, Bilezikian JP. Hypocalcemic emergencies. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1993;22:363–

375.

47. Martin TJ, Kang Y, Robertson KM, et al. Ionization and hemodynamic effects of calcium chloride

and calcium gluconate in the absence of hepatic function. Anesthesiology 1990;73(1):62–65.

48. Javaheri S, Shore NS, Rose B, et al. Compensatory hypoventilation in metabolic alkalosis. Chest

1982;81:296–301.

49. Polak A, Haynie GD, Hays RM, et al. Effects of chronic hypercapnia on electrolyte and acid-base

equilibrium. Adaptation. J Clin Invest 1961;40:1223–1237.

50. Lemann J Jr, Lennon EJ. Role of diet, gastrointestinal tract, and bone in acid-base homeostasis.

Kidney Int 1972;1(5):275–279.

51. American Diabetes Association. www.diabetes.org. Accessed November 3, 2014.

52. Kitabchi AE, Wall BM. Management of diabetic ketoacidosis. Am Fam Physician 1999;60(2):455–

464.

369

http://surgerybook.net/

Chapter 12

Burns

Benjamin Levi, Mark R. Hemmila, and Stewart C. Wang

Key Points

1 Burn reconstruction remains a challenge given the increased survival of burn patients.

2 Most chemical injuries should be treated with dilution of the chemical rather than neutralization.

3 Frostbite outcomes are improved if patients with threatened extremities are treated with tPA within

24 hours of injury.

4 Resuscitation is of crucial importance for burn patient outcome and physicians must be aware when

to begin resuscitation (>20% TBSA) and to monitor the patient’s response to avoid

overresuscitation.

5 Early excision and grafting within 72 hours of the injury remains a pillar of burn care.

6 Order of burn coverage can affect patient outcome and can help prevent the patient from needing a

tracheostomy.

7 In addition to surgical treatment of hypertrophic scars, new laser technologies allow for scar

rehabilitation improving the quality and pain associated with these scars.

INTRODUCTION

Burn injuries represent a major source of trauma, subsequent scarring and debility throughout the

world. Improved worker safety programs, fire prevention efforts, and fire detection systems have

significantly decreased the prevalence of major burn injuries. Burn patients have also benefited from

recent improvements in surgical critical care in areas such as lung protective ventilation, blood glucose

control, and antibiotic stewardship. Overall, survival after burn injuries remains high, leading to a large

need for improved reconstructive treatment options for burn scar rehabilitation.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

1 Based on the American Burn Association (ABA) National Burn Repository, 450,000 people receive

medical treatment for burns annually. There are 40,000 hospital admissions and 3,400 deaths per year

from fire and smoke inhalation.1 Of these patients, 69% are male, 59% are Caucasian, 20% are African

American, and 15% are Hispanic. The cause of these burn injuries varies with 43% from fire or flame

burns, 34% from scald burns, 9% from contact burns, and 7% are electrical and chemical burns. With

increased safety emphasis in the workplace, only 9% of these injuries occur at work. The majority of

chemical, electrical, and molten burns occur at home and 72% of all burn injuries happen at home. As in

other trauma populations, children are affected to a greater degree. Children under 8 years of age

typically suffer from scald burns caused by spilling of hot liquids. With improved surgical critical care

and understanding of burn injury physiology, over 96% of burn patients survive. Thus, with improved

treatments and survival, there has also been an increased focus on burn reconstruction and scar

management.

Children

Infants and children up to 4 years old comprise almost one-third of burns. Burns are the fifth leading

cause of unintentional nonfatal injury in infants and the third leading cause of fatal injury for newborns

to children 9 years of age. Scald burns caused by hot liquids are the most common cause of pediatric

burns and occur most often in the home.2–5 The number of burns decreases from age 9 until adolescence

and increases again after the age of 15, presumably due to greater exposure to hazards,

370

http://surgerybook.net/

No comments:

Post a Comment

اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع