1988 PART 6 Disorders of the Cardiovascular System
diaphoresis. Anginal chest pain even in the absence of CAD may occur
in patients with severe AR, even in younger patients. Anginal pain may
develop at rest as well as during exertion. Nocturnal angina may be
a particularly troublesome symptom, and it may be accompanied by
marked diaphoresis. The anginal episodes can be prolonged and often
do not respond satisfactorily to sublingual nitroglycerin. Systemic fluid
accumulation, including congestive hepatomegaly and ankle edema,
may develop late in the course of the disease.
■ PHYSICAL FINDINGS
In chronic severe AR, the jarring of the entire body and the bobbing
motion of the head with each systole can be appreciated, and the abrupt
distention and collapse of the larger arteries are easily visible. The
examination should be directed toward the detection of conditions
predisposing to AR, such as bicuspid valve, IE, Marfan syndrome, or
ankylosing spondylitis.
Arterial Pulse A rapidly rising “water-hammer” pulse, which collapses suddenly as arterial pressure falls rapidly during late systole and
diastole (Corrigan’s pulse), and capillary pulsations, an alternate flushing and paling of the skin at the root of the nail while pressure is applied
to the tip of the nail (Quincke’s pulse), are characteristic of chronic
severe AR. A booming “pistol-shot” sound can be heard over the femoral arteries (Traube’s sign), and a to-and-fro murmur (Duroziez’s sign)
is audible if the femoral artery is lightly compressed with a stethoscope.
The arterial pulse pressure is widened as a result of both systolic
hypertension and a lowering of the diastolic pressure. The measurement of arterial diastolic pressure with a sphygmomanometer may be
complicated by the fact that systolic sounds are frequently heard with
the cuff completely deflated. However, the level of cuff pressure at the
time of muffling of the Korotkoff sounds (phase IV) generally corresponds fairly closely to the true intra-arterial diastolic pressure. As the
disease progresses and the LV end-diastolic pressure rises, the arterial
diastolic pressure may actually rise as well, because the aortic diastolic
pressure cannot fall below the LV end-diastolic pressure. For the same
reason, acute severe AR may also be accompanied by only a slight widening of the pulse pressure. Such patients are invariably tachycardic as
the heart rate increases in an attempt to preserve the CO.
Palpation In patients with chronic severe AR, the LV impulse is
heaving and displaced laterally and inferiorly. The systolic expansion
and diastolic retraction of the apex are prominent. A diastolic thrill
may be palpable along the left sternal border in thin-chested individuals, and a prominent systolic thrill may be palpable in the suprasternal
notch and transmitted upward along the carotid arteries. This systolic
thrill and the accompanying murmur do not necessarily signify the
coexistence of AS. In some patients with AR or with combined AS and
AR, the carotid arterial pulse may be bisferiens, i.e., with two systolic
waves separated by a trough (see Fig. 239-2C).
Auscultation In patients with severe AR, the aortic valve closure
sound (A2
) is usually absent. A systolic ejection sound is audible in
patients with BAV disease, and occasionally an S4
also may be heard.
The murmur of chronic AR is typically a high-pitched, blowing, decrescendo diastolic murmur, heard best in the third intercostal space along
the left sternal border (see Fig. 239-5B). In patients with mild AR, this
murmur is brief, but as the severity increases, it generally becomes
louder and longer, indeed holodiastolic. When the murmur is soft, it
can be heard best with the diaphragm of the stethoscope and with the
patient sitting up, leaning forward, and with the breath held in forced
expiration. In patients in whom the AR is caused by primary valvular
disease, the diastolic murmur is usually louder along the left than the
right sternal border. However, when the murmur is louder along the
right sternal border, it suggests that the AR is caused by aneurysmal
dilation of the aortic root. “Cooing” or musical diastolic murmurs
suggest eversion of an aortic cusp vibrating in the regurgitant stream.
A mid-systolic ejection murmur is frequently audible in isolated
AR. It is generally heard best at the base of the heart and is transmitted
along the carotid arteries. This murmur may be quite loud without signifying aortic valve obstruction. A third murmur sometimes heard in
patients with severe AR is the Austin Flint murmur, a soft, low-pitched,
rumbling mid-to-late diastolic murmur. It is probably produced by the
diastolic displacement of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve by the
AR stream and is not associated with hemodynamically significant
mitral valve obstruction. The auscultatory features of AR are intensified by strenuous and sustained handgrip, which augments systemic
vascular resistance and increases LV afterload.
In acute severe AR, the elevation of LV end-diastolic pressure may
lead to early closure of the mitral valve, a soft S1
, a pulse pressure that
is not particularly wide, and a soft, short, early diastolic murmur of AR.
■ LABORATORY EXAMINATION
ECG In patients with chronic severe AR, ECG signs of LV hypertrophy are common (Chap. 240). In addition, these patients frequently
exhibit ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion in leads I, aVL,
V5
, and V6
(“LV strain”). Left axis deviation and/or QRS prolongation
may also be present.
Echocardiogram LV size is increased in chronic AR, and systolic
function is normal or even supernormal until myocardial contractility
declines, as signaled by a decrease in EF or increase in the end-systolic
dimension. A rapid, high-frequency diastolic fluttering of the anterior
mitral leaflet produced by the impact of the regurgitant jet is a characteristic finding. The echocardiogram is also useful in determining
the cause of AR, by detecting dilation of the aortic annulus and root,
aortic dissection (see Fig. 241-5), or primary leaflet pathology. With
severe AR, the central jet width assessed by color flow Doppler imaging
exceeds 65% of the width of the LV outflow tract, the regurgitant volume is ≥60 mL/beat, the regurgitant fraction is ≥50%, and there is diastolic flow reversal in the proximal portion of the descending thoracic
aorta. The continuous-wave Doppler profile of the AR jet shows a rapid
deceleration time in patients with acute severe AR, due to the rapid
increase in LV diastolic pressure. Surveillance transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) forms the cornerstone of longitudinal follow-up and
allows for the early detection of changes in LV size and/or function.
For patients in whom TTE is limited by poor acoustical windows or
inadequate characterization of LV function or the cause or severity of
the regurgitation, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can be
performed. This modality also allows for accurate assessment of aortic
size and contour. It can also be utilized to screen for LV fibrosis as
assessed with late gadolinium enhancement. Both CMR imaging and
cardiac computed tomography (CT) can provide detailed assessment
of aortic valve and root anatomy. Transesophageal echocardiography
(TEE) can also provide detailed anatomic assessment of the valve, root,
and portions of the aorta. There is increasing experience with the use of
three-dimensional echocardiography to measure LV volumes.
Chest X-Ray In chronic severe AR, the apex is displaced downward
and to the left in the frontal projection. In the left anterior oblique and
lateral projections, the LV is displaced posteriorly and encroaches on
the spine. When AR is caused by primary disease of the aortic root,
aneurysmal dilation of the aorta may be noted, and the aorta may
fill the retrosternal space in the lateral view. Echocardiography, CMR
imaging, and chest CT angiography are more sensitive than the chest
x-ray for the detection of root and ascending aortic enlargement.
Cardiac Catheterization and Angiography When needed,
right and left heart catheterization with contrast aortography can provide confirmation of the magnitude of regurgitation and the status of
LV function. Coronary angiography is performed routinely in appropriate patients prior to surgery, although this anatomic information can
also be gained with coronary CT angiographic techniques.
TREATMENT
Aortic Regurgitation
ACUTE AORTIC REGURGITATION (FIG. 262-1)
Patients with acute severe AR may respond to intravenous diuretics
and vasodilators (such as sodium nitroprusside), but stabilization is
Aortic Regurgitation
1989CHAPTER 262
Low
surgical risk
Aortic regurgitation
Severe AR
(VC >0.6 cm, holodiastolic
aortic flow reversal, RVol ≥60 mL,
RF ≥50%, ERO ≥0.3 cm2)
Symptomatic
(Stage D)
Asymptomatic
(Stage C)
Moderate
AR
Other
cardiac
surgery
Other
cardiac
surgery
AVR (1) AVR (2a) AVR (2b) AVR (2a)
EF ≤55%
(Stage C2)
EF ≥55%
LVESD >50 mm
and
LVESD >25 mm/m2
Progressive
changes
(≥3 studies)
EF 55–60%
EDD >65 mm
FIGURE 262-1 Management of patients with aortic regurgitation. See legend for Fig. 261-4 for explanation of treatment recommendations (Class I, IIa, and IIb) and disease
stages (B, C1, C2, and D). Preoperative coronary angiography should be performed routinely as determined by age, symptoms, and coronary risk factors. Cardiac catheterization
and angiography may also be helpful when there is a discrepancy between clinical and noninvasive findings. Surgery is indicated for patients with severe AR and symptoms,
LV dysfunction, or other indications for operation (e.g., aneurysm disease). Surgery is also reasonable once the LV indexed end-systolic dimension reaches or exceeds 25 mm/
m2
. Patients who do not meet criteria for intervention should be monitored periodically with clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. AR, aortic regurgitation; AVR, aortic valve
replacement (valve repair may be appropriate in selected patients); EDD, end-diastolic dimension; EF, ejection fraction; ERO, effective regurgitant orifice; LV, left ventricular;
LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; RF, regurgitant fraction; RVol, regurgitant
volume; VC, vena contracta. (Reproduced with permission from CM Otto et al: 2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 143:e72, 2021.)
usually short-lived and operation is indicated urgently. Intra-aortic
balloon counterpulsation is contraindicated. Beta blockers are best
avoided so as not to reduce the CO further or slow the heart rate,
thus allowing more time for diastolic filling of the LV. Surgery is
the treatment of choice and is usually necessary within 24 h of
diagnosis.
CHRONIC AORTIC REGURGITATION
The onset of symptoms, or LV systolic dysfunction, is an indication for surgery. Medical treatment with diuretics and vasodilators
(angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor
blockers [ARBs], dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, or
hydralazine) may be useful as a temporizing measure. Surgery
can then be performed in a more controlled setting. The use of
vasodilators to extend the compensated phase of chronic severe
AR in asymptomatic patients before the onset of symptoms or
the development of LV dysfunction is not useful, although these
agents should be employed to treat hypertension (systolic blood
pressure >140 mm Hg). It is often difficult to achieve adequate
blood pressure control because of the increased stroke volume and
enhanced LV ejection that accompany severe AR. Cardiac arrhythmias and systemic infections are poorly tolerated in patients with
severe AR and must be treated promptly and vigorously. Although
nitroglycerin and long-acting nitrates are not as helpful in relieving
anginal pain as they are in patients with coronary heart disease,
they are worth a trial. Patients with syphilitic aortitis should receive
a full course of penicillin therapy (Chap. 182). Beta blockers and
the ARB losartan may be useful to retard the rate of aortic root
enlargement in young patients with Marfan’s syndrome and aortic
root dilation. A randomized controlled trial showed no difference in efficacy between atenolol and losartan for this indication.
Whether beta blockers or ARBs are useful in retarding the rate
of growth of aortic aneurysms in other patient subsets (e.g., BAV
disease with aortopathy, Takayasu’s disease) has not been demonstrated. Beta blockers in patients with valvular AR were previously
considered relatively contraindicated due to concern that slowing
of the heart rate would allow more time for diastolic regurgitation.
Observational reports, however, have suggested that beta blockers
may provide functional benefit in some patients with chronic AR.
Beta blockers can sometimes provide incremental blood pressure
lowering in patients with chronic AR and hypertension. They can
also lessen the sense of forceful heart action that many patients find
uncomfortable. Patients with severe AR, particularly those with an
associated aortopathy, should avoid isometric exercises.
1990 PART 6 Disorders of the Cardiovascular System
A
B
C
D
FIGURE 262-2 Valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction (David procedure). Aortic root and proximal ascending aorta (A) are resected (B) with sinuses of Valsalva and
mobilized coronary artery buttons remaining. Subannular sutures (C) are placed, commissural posts are drawn up inside the valve, and the annular sutures are passed
through the proximal end of the graft. The annular sutures are tied (D), the valve is reimplanted inside the graft, aortic continuity is reestablished with another graft of
appropriate size, and the coronary buttons are attached to the side of the graft. (From P Steltzer et al [eds]: Valvular Heart Disease: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart
Disease, 3rd ed, Fig. 12-27, p. 200.)
SURGICAL TREATMENT
In deciding on the advisability and proper timing of surgical treatment, two points should be kept in mind: (1) patients with chronic
severe AR usually do not become symptomatic until after the development of myocardial dysfunction; and (2) when delayed too long
(defined as >1 year from onset of symptoms or LV dysfunction),
surgical treatment often does not restore normal LV size and function. Therefore, in patients with chronic severe AR, careful clinical
follow-up and noninvasive testing with echocardiography at ~6- to
12-month intervals are necessary if operation is to be undertaken at
the optimal time, i.e., after the onset of LV dysfunction but prior to
the development of severe symptoms. Exercise testing may be helpful
to assess effort tolerance more objectively. Operation can be deferred
as long as the patient both remains asymptomatic and retains normal
LV function without severe or progressive chamber dilation.
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is indicated for the treatment
of severe AR in symptomatic patients irrespective of LV function.
In general, the operation should be carried out in asymptomatic
patients with severe AR and progressive LV dysfunction defined
by an LVEF <55% on serial studies, an LV end-systolic dimension
>50 mm (>25 mm/m2
), or an LV diastolic dimension >65 mm.
Smaller dimensions may be appropriate thresholds in individuals of smaller stature or when there is evidence of progressively
decreasing LV function or increasing LV size on serial studies and
the anticipated risks for surgical morbidity and mortality are low.
Two case series from surgical referral centers have suggested that
surgery should be performed at an even lower threshold for LV endsystolic dimension index (≥20 mm/m2
), but data from randomized
controlled trials are lacking. Patients with severe AR without indications for operation should be followed by clinical and echocardiographic examination every 6–12 months. Transcatheter aortic valve
implantation (TAVI) is not recommended for patients with severe
AR who are surgical candidates. Technical success with TAVI in
patients with chronic AR is limited by the degree of aortic annular
dilation and the relative paucity of valvular and annular calcium.
Surgical options for management of aortic valve and root disease have expanded considerably over the past decade. AVR with
a suitable mechanical or tissue (biological) prosthesis is generally
necessary in patients with rheumatic AR and in many patients with
other causes of valvular AR. Rarely, when a leaflet has been perforated during IE or torn from its attachments to the aortic annulus
by thoracic trauma, primary surgical repair may be possible. When
AR is due to aneurysmal dilation of the root or proximal ascending
aorta rather than to primary valve involvement, it may be possible
to reduce or eliminate the regurgitation by narrowing the annulus
or by excising a portion of the aortic root without replacing the
valve. Elective, valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction generally
involves reimplantation of the valve in a contoured graft with reattachment of the coronary artery buttons into the side of the graft
and is best undertaken in specialized surgical centers (Fig. 262-2).
Resuspension of the native aortic valve leaflets is possible in ~50%
of patients with acute AR in the setting of type A aortic dissection.
Mitral Stenosis
1991CHAPTER 263
TABLE 262-2 Mortality Rates After Aortic Valve Surgerya
OPERATION NUMBER
UNADJUSTED OPERATIVE
MORTALITY (%)
AVR (isolated) 25,274 1.9
AVR + CAB 15,855 3.6
a
Data are for calendar year 2018 during which 1088 participant groups reported a
total of 287,872 procedures.
Abbreviations: AVR, aortic valve replacement; CAB, coronary artery bypass.
Source: Adapted from ME Bowdish et al: Ann Thorac Surg 109:1646, 2020.
In other conditions, however, AR can be effectively eliminated only
by replacing the aortic valve, as well as the dilated or aneurysmal
ascending aorta responsible for the regurgitation, and implanting a
composite valve-graft conduit. This formidable procedure entails a
higher risk than isolated AVR.
As is true in patients with other valvular heart disease, both
operative and late mortality risks are largely dependent on the stage
of the disease and myocardial function at the time of operation. The
overall operative mortality rate for isolated AVR (performed for
either or both AS or AR) is ~2% (Table 262-2). However, patients
with AR, marked cardiac enlargement, and established LV dysfunction experience an operative mortality rate of ~10% and a late
mortality rate of ~5% per year due to LV failure despite a technically
satisfactory operation. Nonetheless, because of the very poor prognosis with medical management, even patients with advanced LV
systolic dysfunction should be considered for operation.
Patients with acute severe AR require prompt (24–48 h) surgical
treatment, which may be lifesaving.
■ FURTHER READING
Lacro RV et al: Atenolol versus losartan in children and young adults
with Marfan’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 371:2061, 2014.
Malaisrie SC, McCarthy PM: Surgical approach to disease of the
aortic valve and the aortic root, in Valvular Heart Disease: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease, 5th ed. CM Otto, RO Bonow (eds).
Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders, 2020, pp 267–288.
Otto CM et al: 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management
of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American
College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee
on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 143:e72, 2021.
The role of the physical examination in the evaluation of patients with
valvular heart disease is also considered in Chaps. 42 and 239; of electrocardiography (ECG) in Chap. 240; of echocardiography and other
noninvasive imaging techniques in Chap. 241; and of cardiac catheterization and angiography in Chap. 242.
MITRAL STENOSIS
■ ETIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY
Rheumatic fever is the leading cause of mitral stenosis (MS)
(Table 263-1; see also Chap. 359). Other less common etiologies of
obstruction to left ventricular inflow include congenital mitral valve
stenosis, cor triatriatum, mitral annular calcification with extension
onto the leaflets, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis,
left atrial myxoma, and infective endocarditis with large vegetations.
263 Mitral Stenosis
Patrick T. O’Gara, Joseph Loscalzo
TABLE 263-1 Major Causes of Mitral Stenosis
Etiologies
Rheumatic fever
Congenital (parachute valve, cor triatriatum)
Severe mitral annular calcification with leaflet involvement
SLE, RA
Myxoma
IE with large vegetations
Abbreviations: IE, infective endocarditis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SLE, systemic
lupus erythematosus.
Pure or predominant MS occurs in ~40% of all patients with rheumatic heart disease and a history of rheumatic fever (Chap. 359). In
other patients with rheumatic heart disease, lesser degrees of MS may
accompany mitral regurgitation (MR) and aortic valve disease. With
reductions in the incidence of acute rheumatic fever, particularly in
temperate climates and middle- to high-income countries, the incidence of MS has declined considerably over the past several decades.
However, it remains a major problem in low-income countries,
especially in sub-Saharan Africa, India, Southeast Asia, and Oceania
(Chap. 261).
In rheumatic MS, chronic inflammation leads to diffuse thickening of the valve leaflets with formation of fibrous tissue often with
calcific deposits. The mitral commissures fuse, the chordae tendineae
fuse and shorten, the valvular cusps become rigid, and the pathologic
process eventually leads to narrowing at the apex of the funnel-shaped
(“fish-mouth”) valve. Although the initial insult to the mitral valve is
rheumatic, later changes may be exacerbated by inflammation, fibrosis, and trauma to the valve due to altered flow patterns. Calcification
of the stenotic mitral valve immobilizes the leaflets and narrows the
orifice further. Thrombus formation and arterial embolization may
arise from the calcific valve itself, but in patients with atrial fibrillation
(AF), thrombi arise more frequently from the dilated left atrium (LA),
particularly from within the LA appendage.
■ PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
In normal adults, the area of the mitral valve orifice is 4–6 cm2
. In
the presence of significant obstruction, i.e., when the orifice area is
reduced to <~2 cm2
, blood can flow from the LA to the left ventricle
(LV) only if propelled by an abnormally elevated left atrioventricular
pressure gradient, the hemodynamic hallmark of MS. When the mitral
valve opening is reduced to <1.5 cm2
, referred to as “severe” MS, an
LA pressure of ~25 mmHg is required to maintain a normal cardiac
output (CO). The elevated pulmonary venous and pulmonary arterial
(PA) wedge pressures reduce pulmonary compliance, contributing to
exertional dyspnea. The first bouts of dyspnea are usually precipitated
by clinical events that increase the rate of blood flow across the mitral
orifice, resulting in further elevation of the LA pressure (see below).
To assess the severity of obstruction hemodynamically, both the
transvalvular pressure gradient and the flow rate must be measured
(Chap. 242). The latter depends not only on the CO but on the heart
rate, as well. An increase in heart rate shortens diastole proportionately
more than systole and diminishes the time available for flow across the
mitral valve. Therefore, at any given level of CO, tachycardia, including
that associated with rapid AF, augments the transvalvular pressure
gradient and elevates further the LA pressure. Similar considerations
apply to the pathophysiology of tricuspid stenosis (TS).
The LV diastolic pressure and ejection fraction (EF) are normal in
isolated MS. In MS and sinus rhythm, the elevated LA and PA wedge
pressures exhibit a prominent atrial contraction pattern (a wave) and
a gradual pressure decline after the v wave and mitral valve opening
(y descent). In severe MS and whenever pulmonary vascular resistance
is significantly increased, the PA pressure (PAP) is elevated at rest and
rises further during exercise, often causing secondary elevations of
right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic pressure and volume.
Cardiac Output In patients with severe MS (mitral valve orifice
1–1.5 cm2
), the CO is normal or almost so at rest, but rises subnormally
1992 PART 6 Disorders of the Cardiovascular System
during exertion. In patients with very severe MS (valve area <1 cm2
),
particularly those in whom pulmonary vascular resistance is markedly
elevated, the CO is subnormal at rest and may fail to rise or may even
decline during activity.
Pulmonary Hypertension The clinical and hemodynamic features of MS are influenced importantly by the level of the PAP. Pulmonary hypertension results from (1) passive backward transmission
of the elevated LA pressure; (2) pulmonary arteriolar constriction (the
so-called “second stenosis”), which presumably is triggered by LA and
pulmonary venous hypertension (reactive pulmonary hypertension);
(3) interstitial edema in the walls of the small pulmonary vessels; and
(4) at end stage, organic obliterative changes in the pulmonary vascular
bed. Severe pulmonary hypertension results in RV enlargement, secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and pulmonic regurgitation (PR),
as well as right-sided heart failure.
■ SYMPTOMS
In temperate climates, the latent period between the initial attack of
rheumatic carditis (in the increasingly rare circumstances in which a
history of one can be elicited) and the development of symptoms due to
MS is generally about two decades; most patients begin to experience
disability in the fourth decade of life. Studies carried out before the
development of surgical mitral valvotomy revealed that once a patient
with MS became seriously symptomatic, the disease progressed inexorably to death within 2–5 years.
In patients whose mitral orifices are large enough to accommodate
a normal blood flow with only mild elevations of LA pressure, marked
elevations of this pressure leading to dyspnea and cough may be precipitated by sudden changes in the heart rate, volume status, or CO,
as, for example, with severe exertion, excitement, fever, severe anemia,
paroxysmal AF and other tachycardias, sexual intercourse, pregnancy,
and thyrotoxicosis. As MS progresses, lesser degrees of stress precipitate dyspnea, the patient becomes limited in daily activities, and
orthopnea and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea develop. The development of persistent AF often marks a turning point in the patient’s
course and is generally associated with acceleration of the rate at which
symptoms progress. Hemoptysis (Chap. 39) results from rupture of
pulmonary-bronchial venous connections secondary to pulmonary
venous hypertension. It occurs most frequently in patients who have
elevated LA pressures without markedly elevated pulmonary vascular
resistances and is rarely fatal. Recurrent pulmonary emboli (Chap. 279),
sometimes with infarction, are an important cause of morbidity and
mortality late in the course of MS. Pulmonary infections, i.e., bronchitis, bronchopneumonia, and lobar pneumonia, commonly complicate
untreated MS, especially during the winter months.
Pulmonary Changes In addition to the aforementioned changes
in the pulmonary vascular bed, fibrous thickening of the walls of the
alveoli and pulmonary capillaries occurs commonly in MS. The vital
capacity, total lung capacity, maximal breathing capacity, and oxygen
uptake per unit of ventilation are reduced (Chap. 285). Pulmonary
compliance falls further as pulmonary capillary pressure rises during
exercise.
Thrombi and Emboli Thrombi may form in the left atria, particularly within the enlarged atrial appendages of patients with MS.
Systemic embolization, the incidence of which is 10–20%, occurs more
frequently in patients with AF, in patients >65 years of age, and in those
with a reduced CO. However, systemic embolization may be the presenting feature in otherwise asymptomatic patients with only mild MS.
■ PHYSICAL FINDINGS
(See also Chaps. 42 and 239)
Inspection and Palpation In patients with severe MS, there may
be a malar flush with pinched and blue facies. In patients with sinus
rhythm and severe pulmonary hypertension or associated TS, the jugular venous pulse reveals prominent a waves due to vigorous right atrial
systole. The systemic arterial pressure is usually normal or slightly
low. A parasternal lift signifies an enlarged RV. A diastolic thrill may
rarely be present at the cardiac apex, with the patient in the left lateral
recumbent position.
Auscultation The first heart sound (S1
) is usually accentuated
in the early stages of the disease and slightly delayed. The pulmonic
component of the second heart sound (P2
) also is often accentuated
with elevated PAPs, and the two components of the second heart sound
(S2
) are closely split. The opening snap (OS) of the mitral valve is most
readily audible in expiration at, or just medial to, the cardiac apex.
This sound generally follows the sound of aortic valve closure (A2
) by
0.05–0.12 s. The time interval between A2
and OS varies inversely with
the severity of the MS. The OS is followed by a low-pitched, rumbling,
diastolic murmur, heard best at the apex with the patient in the left
lateral recumbent position (see Fig. 239-5); it is accentuated by mild
exercise (e.g., a few rapid sit-ups) carried out just before auscultation.
In general, the duration of this murmur correlates with the severity
of the stenosis in patients with preserved CO. In patients with sinus
rhythm, the murmur often reappears or becomes louder during atrial
systole (presystolic accentuation). Soft, grade I or II/VI systolic murmurs may be heard at or medial to the apex and may signify mixed
mitral valve disease with regurgitation. Hepatomegaly, ankle edema,
ascites, and pleural effusion, particularly in the right pleural cavity, may
occur in patients with MS and RV failure.
Associated Lesions With severe pulmonary hypertension, a pansystolic murmur produced by functional TR may be audible along the
left sternal border. This murmur is usually louder during inspiration
and diminishes during forced expiration (Carvallo’s sign). When the
CO is markedly reduced in MS, the typical auscultatory findings,
including the diastolic rumbling murmur, may not be detectable (silent
MS), but they may reappear as compensation is restored. The Graham
Steell murmur of PR, a high-pitched, diastolic, decrescendo blowing
murmur along the left sternal border, results from dilation of the pulmonary valve ring and occurs in patients with mitral valve disease and
severe pulmonary hypertension. This murmur may be indistinguishable from the more common murmur produced by aortic regurgitation
(AR), although it may increase in intensity with inspiration and is
accompanied by a loud and often palpable P2
.
■ LABORATORY EXAMINATION
ECG In MS and sinus rhythm, the P wave usually suggests LA
enlargement (see Fig. 240-8). It may become tall and peaked in lead
II and upright in lead V1
when severe pulmonary hypertension or TS
complicates MS and right atrial (RA) enlargement develops. The QRS
complex is usually normal. However, with severe pulmonary hypertension, right axis deviation and RV hypertrophy are often present.
Echocardiogram (See also Chap. 241) Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with color flow and spectral Doppler imaging
provides critical information, including measurements of mitral inflow
velocity during early (E wave) and late (A wave in patients in sinus
rhythm) diastolic filling, estimates of the transvalvular peak and mean
gradients and mitral orifice area, the presence and severity of any associated MR, the extent of leaflet calcification and restriction, the degree of
distortion of the subvalvular apparatus, and the anatomic suitability for
percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy (PMBC; see below). In
addition, TTE provides an assessment of LV and RV function, chamber
sizes, an estimation of the PA systolic pressure based on the tricuspid
regurgitant jet velocity, and an indication of the presence and severity
of any associated valvular lesions, such as aortic stenosis (AS) and/
or regurgitation. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides
superior images and should be used when TTE is inadequate for guiding management decisions. TEE is especially indicated to exclude the
presence of LA thrombus prior to PMBC. The performance of TTE with
exercise to evaluate the mean mitral diastolic gradient and PAPs can be
very helpful in the evaluation of patients with MS when there is a discrepancy between the clinical findings and the resting hemodynamics.
Chest X-Ray The earliest changes are straightening of the upper left
border of the cardiac silhouette, prominence of the main PAs, dilation
Mitral Stenosis
1993CHAPTER 263
of the upper lobe pulmonary veins, and posterior displacement of the
esophagus by an enlarged LA. Kerley B lines are fine, dense, opaque,
horizontal lines that are most prominent in the lower and mid-lung
fields that result from distention of interlobular septae and lymphatics
with edema when the resting mean LA pressure exceeds ~20 mmHg.
■ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
Like MS, significant MR may also be associated with a prominent diastolic murmur at the apex due to increased antegrade transmitral flow,
but in patients with isolated MR, this diastolic murmur commences
slightly later than in patients with MS, and there is often clear-cut
evidence of LV enlargement. An OS and increased P2
are absent, and
S1
is soft or absent. An apical pansystolic murmur of at least grade III/
VI intensity as well as an S3
suggests significant MR. Similarly, the
apical mid-diastolic murmur associated with severe AR (Austin Flint
murmur) may be mistaken for MS but can be differentiated from it
because it is not intensified in pre-systole and becomes softer with
administration of amyl nitrite or other arterial vasodilators. TS, which
occurs rarely in the absence of MS, may mask many of the clinical features of MS or be clinically silent; when present, the diastolic murmur
of TS increases with inspiration and the y descent in the jugular venous
pulse is delayed.
Atrial septal defect (Chap. 269) may be mistaken for MS; in both
conditions, there is often clinical, ECG, and chest x-ray evidence of RV
enlargement and accentuation of pulmonary vascularity. However, the
absence of LA enlargement and of Kerley B lines and the demonstration of fixed splitting of S2
with a grade II or III mid-systolic murmur
at the mid to upper left sternal border all favor atrial septal defect over
MS. Atrial septal defects with large left-to-right shunts may result in
functional TS because of the enhanced diastolic flow.
Left atrial myxoma (Chap. 271) may obstruct LA emptying, causing
dyspnea, a diastolic murmur, and hemodynamic changes resembling
those of MS. However, patients with an LA myxoma often have features
suggestive of a systemic disease, such as weight loss, fever, anemia,
systemic emboli, and elevated serum IgG and interleukin 6 (IL-6) concentrations. The auscultatory findings may change markedly with body
position. The diagnosis can be established by the demonstration of a
characteristic echo-producing mass in the LA with TTE.
■ CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION
Left and right heart catheterization can be useful when there is a
discrepancy between the clinical and noninvasive findings, including
those from TEE and exercise echocardiographic testing when appropriate. Catheterization can also be helpful in assessing associated
lesions, such as AS and AR, and in patients with recurring or worsening
symptoms later after mitral valve intervention. Computed tomographic
coronary angiography is increasingly used to screen preoperatively for
the presence of coronary artery disease in appropriate patients prior to
heart valve surgery or transcatheter treatment.
TREATMENT
Mitral Stenosis (Fig. 263-1)
Penicillin prophylaxis of group A β-hemolytic streptococcal infections (Chap. 359) for secondary prevention of rheumatic fever is
Yes
Yes
No
Rheumatic mitral
stenosis
Severe MS
MVA ≤1.5 cm2
Surgical
candidate
PMBC at
CVC (1)
MV surgery
(1)
PMBC at
CVC (2b)
PMBC at
CVC (2b)
PMBC at
CVC (2a)
New AF PASP
>50 mmHg
Symptomatic
Stage D
Severe
symptoms
NYHA III–IV
No Pliable valve
No clot
<2+ MR
Pliable valve
No clot
<2+ MR
Pliable valve
No clot
<2+ MR
Stress test
Hemodynamically
significant MS
Asymptomatic
Stage C
Progressive MS
MVA >1.5 cm2
Exertional
symptoms
FIGURE 263-1 Management of rheumatic mitral stenosis. See legend for Fig. 261-4 for explanation of treatment recommendations (Class I, IIa, IIb) and disease stages (C,
D). Preoperative coronary angiography should be performed routinely as determined by age, symptoms, and coronary risk factors. Cardiac catheterization and angiography
may also be helpful when there is a discrepancy between clinical and noninvasive findings. AF, atrial fibrillation; CVC, comprehensive valve center; MR, mitral regurgitation;
MS, mitral stenosis; MV, mitral valve; MVA, mitral valve area; MVR, mitral valve surgery (repair or replacement); NYHA, New York Heart Association; PASP, pulmonary
arterial systolic pressure; PMBC, percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy. (Reproduced with permission from CM Otto et al: ACC/AHA guideline for the management of
patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation
143:e72, 2021.)
1994 PART 6 Disorders of the Cardiovascular System
important for at-risk patients with rheumatic MS. Recommendations for infective endocarditis prophylaxis are similar to those for
other valve lesions and are restricted to patients at high risk for
complications from infection, including patients with a history of
endocarditis. In symptomatic patients, some improvement usually occurs with restriction of sodium intake and small doses of
oral diuretics. Beta blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium channel
blockers (e.g., verapamil or diltiazem), and digitalis glycosides are
useful in slowing the ventricular rate of patients with AF. Vitamin
K antagonist therapy (such as warfarin) targeted to an international
normalized ratio (INR) of 2–3 should be administered indefinitely
to patients with MS who have AF, a history of thromboembolism, or
demonstrated LA thrombus. The routine use of a vitamin K antagonist in patients in sinus rhythm with LA enlargement (maximal
dimension >5.5 cm) with or without spontaneous echo contrast
is more controversial. As of this writing, non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (e.g., apixaban, rivaroxaban) have not been adequately
studied in patients with moderate or severe rheumatic MS and,
thus, are not recommended.
If AF is of relatively recent onset in a patient whose MS is not
severe enough to warrant PMBC or surgical intervention, reversion to sinus rhythm pharmacologically or by means of electrical countershock is indicated. Usually, cardioversion should be
undertaken after the patient has had at least 3 consecutive weeks
of anticoagulant treatment to a therapeutic INR. If cardioversion is
indicated more urgently, then intravenous heparin should be provided and TEE performed to exclude the presence of LA thrombus
before the procedure. Conversion to sinus rhythm is rarely successful or sustained in patients with severe MS, particularly those
in whom the LA is significantly enlarged or in whom AF has been
present for >1 year, conditions that favor the development of an LA
myopathy.
MITRAL COMMISSUROTOMY
Unless there is a contraindication, mitral commissurotomy is indicated in symptomatic (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Functional Class II–IV) patients with isolated severe MS, whose effective
orifice (valve area) is <~1 cm2
/m2
body surface area, or <1.5 cm2
in normal-sized adults. Mitral commissurotomy can be carried
out either percutaneously or surgically. In PMBC (Figs. 263-2 and
263-3), a catheter is directed into the LA after transseptal puncture, and a single balloon is directed across the valve and inflated
in the valvular orifice. Ideal patients have relatively pliable leaflets
with little or no commissural calcium. In addition, the subvalvular
structures should not be significantly scarred or thickened, and
there should be no LA thrombus. Any associated MR should be of
≤2+/4+ severity. The short- and long-term results of this procedure
in appropriate patients are similar to those of surgical commissurotomy, but with less morbidity and a lower periprocedural mortality
rate. Event-free survival in younger (<45 years) patients with
pliable valves is excellent, with rates as high as 80–90% over 3–7
years. Therefore, PMBC is the procedure of choice for such patients
when it can be performed by a skilled operator in a high-volume
center.
TTE is helpful in identifying patients for the percutaneous procedure; TEE is performed routinely to exclude LA thrombus and
to assess the degree of MR at the time of the scheduled procedure.
An “echo score” has been developed to help guide decision-making.
The score accounts for the degree of leaflet thickening, calcification,
and mobility, and for the extent of subvalvular thickening. A lower
score predicts a higher likelihood of successful PMBC.
In patients in whom PMBC is not possible or unsuccessful, or
in many patients with restenosis after previous surgery, an “open”
surgical commissurotomy using cardiopulmonary bypass is necessary. In addition to opening the valve commissures, it is important
to loosen any subvalvular fusion of papillary muscles and chordae
tendineae; to remove large deposits of calcium, thereby improving
valvular function; and to remove atrial thrombi. The perioperative
mortality rate for this type of mitral valve repair procedure is ~2%.
Successful commissurotomy is defined by a 50% reduction in the
mean mitral valve gradient and a doubling of the mitral valve area.
Successful commissurotomy, whether balloon or surgical, usually
results in striking symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement
C D
A B
Guide
wire
Stiffening
cannula
FIGURE 263-2 Inoue balloon technique for percutaneous mitral balloon
commissurotomy. A. After transseptal puncture, the deflated balloon catheter is
advanced across the interatrial septum, then across the mitral valve and into the
left ventricle. B–D. The balloon is inflated stepwise within the mitral orifice.
ECG
PREDILATATION
40
LV
LA
20
Pressure (mmHg)
0
Mean mitral gradient 15 mmHg
Cardiac output 3 L/min
Mitral valve area 0.6 cm2
ECG
POSTDILATATION
40
20
0
Mean mitral gradient 3 mmHg
Cardiac output 3.8 L/min
Mitral valve area 1.8 cm2
LV
LA
FIGURE 263-3 Simultaneous left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) pressure
before and after percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy (PMBC) in a patient
with severe mitral stenosis. ECG, electrocardiogram. (Courtesy of Raymond G.
McKay, MD.)
Mitral Regurgitation
1995CHAPTER 264
TABLE 263-2 Mortality Rates after Mitral Valve Surgerya
OPERATION NUMBER
UNADJUSTED OPERATIVE
MORTALITY (%)
MVR (isolated) 10,699 4.5
MVR + CAB 3509 9.6
MVRp 12,424 1.2
MVRp + CAB 4093 5.4
a
Data are for calendar year 2018 during which 1088 participant groups reported
a total of 287,872 procedures. Surgical mitral valve commissurotomy cases are
included in the mitral valve repair procedures.
Abbreviations: CAB, coronary artery bypass; MVR, mitral valve replacement; MVRp,
mitral valve repair.
Source: Adapted from ME Bowdish et al: Ann Thorac Surg 109:1646, 2020.
and prolongs survival. However, there is no evidence that the procedure improves the prognosis of patients with slight or no functional
impairment. Therefore, unless recurrent systemic embolization or
severe pulmonary hypertension has occurred (PA systolic pressures
>50 mmHg at rest or >60 mmHg with exercise), commissurotomy
is not recommended for patients who are asymptomatic and/or who
have mild or moderate stenosis (mitral valve area >1.5 cm2
). When
there is little symptomatic improvement after commissurotomy, it
is likely that the procedure was ineffective, that it induced MR, or
that associated valvular or myocardial disease was present. About
half of all patients undergoing surgical mitral commissurotomy
require reoperation by 10 years. In the pregnant patient with MS,
commissurotomy should be carried out if pulmonary congestion
occurs despite intensive medical treatment. PMBC is the preferred
strategy in this setting and is performed with TEE and no or minimal x-ray exposure.
Mitral valve replacement (MVR) is necessary in patients with MS
and significant associated MR, those in whom the valve has been
severely distorted by previous transcatheter or operative manipulation, or those in whom the surgeon does not find it possible to
improve valve function significantly with commissurotomy. MVR
is now routinely performed with preservation of the chordal attachments to optimize LV functional recovery. Perioperative mortality
rates with MVR vary with age, LV function, the presence of CAD,
and associated comorbidities. They average 5% overall but are lower
in young patients and may be twice as high in patients >65 years
of age with significant comorbidities (Table 263-2). Because there
are also long-term complications of valve replacement, patients in
whom preoperative evaluation suggests the possibility that MVR
may be required should be operated on only if they have severe
MS—i.e., an orifice area ≤1.5 cm2
—and are in NYHA Class III,
i.e., symptomatic with ordinary activity despite optimal medical
therapy. The overall 10-year survival of surgical survivors is ~70%.
Long-term prognosis is worse in patients >65 years of age and those
with marked disability and marked depression of the CO preoperatively. Pulmonary hypertension and RV dysfunction are additional
risk factors for poor outcome.
■ FURTHER READING
Nishimura RA et al: Mitral valve disease: Current management and
future challenges. Lancet 387:1324, 2016.
Otto CM et al: 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of
patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical
Practice Guidelines. Circulation 143:e72, 2021.
The role of the physical examination in the evaluation of patients with
valvular heart disease is also considered in Chaps. 42 and 239; of electrocardiography (ECG) in Chap. 240; of echocardiography and other
noninvasive imaging techniques in Chap. 241; and of cardiac catheterization and angiography in Chap. 242.
■ ETIOLOGY
Mitral regurgitation (MR) may result from an abnormality or disease
process that affects any one or more of the five functional components
of the mitral valve apparatus (leaflets, annulus, chordae tendineae, papillary muscles, and subjacent myocardium) (Table 264-1). Acute MR
can occur in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI) with papillary muscle rupture (Chap. 275), following blunt chest wall trauma,
or during the course of infective endocarditis (IE) owing to leaflet
perforation or destruction. With acute MI, the posteromedial papillary muscle is involved much more frequently than the anterolateral
papillary muscle because of its singular blood supply. Transient, acute
MR can occur during periods of active ischemia and bouts of angina
pectoris. Rupture of chordae tendineae can result in “acute-on-chronic
MR” in patients with myxomatous degeneration of the valve apparatus.
Chronic MR can result from several disease processes (Table 264-1).
Distinction should be drawn between primary (degenerative) MR, in
which the leaflets and/or chordae tendineae are primarily responsible
for abnormal valve function, and secondary (functional) MR, in which
the leaflets and chordae tendineae are usually normal but the regurgitation is caused by left ventricular (LV) remodeling, annular dilation,
papillary muscle displacement, dyssynchrony, posterior leaflet tethering, or their combination. Patient assessment, treatment approach, and
long-term prognosis differ significantly between primary and secondary MR. Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is discussed more extensively
264 Mitral Regurgitation
Patrick T. O’Gara, Joseph Loscalzo
TABLE 264-1 Major Causes of Mitral Regurgitation (MR)
Etiologies
Acute
IE
Papillary muscle rupture (post-MI)
Chordal rupture/leaflet flail (MVP, IE)
Blunt trauma
Chronic
Primary (affecting leaflets, chordae)
Myxomatous (MVP, Barlow’s, forme fruste)
Rheumatic fever
IE (healed)
Congenital (cleft, AV canal)
Radiation
Secondary (leaflets, chordae are “innocent bystanders”)
Ischemic cardiomyopathy
Dilated cardiomyopathy
HOCM (with SAM)
AF with LA enlargement and annular dilation (atrial functional MR)
Mitral annular calcificationa
a
Mitral annular calcification may include elements of both primary and secondary
MR (mixed) as the disease process may encroach on the leaflets, impair the
normal sphincteric function of the annulus, or both. There are additional examples
of “mixed” secondary MR such as the coexistence of MVP with an ischemic
cardiomyopathy.
Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; AV, atrioventricular; HOCM, hypertrophic
obstructive cardiomyopathy; IE, infective endocarditis; LA, left atrial; LV, left
ventricular; MI, myocardial infarction; MVP, mitral valve prolapse; SAM, systolic
anterior motion.
1996 PART 6 Disorders of the Cardiovascular System
in Chap. 265. The rheumatic process produces rigidity, deformity,
and retraction of the valve cusps and commissural fusion, as well as
shortening, contraction, and fusion of the chordae tendineae. MR can
persist after resolution of the acute phase of infection and inflammation. MR may occur as a congenital anomaly (Chap. 269), most commonly as a defect of the endocardial cushions (atrioventricular cushion
defects). A cleft anterior mitral valve leaflet accompanies ostium
primum atrial septal defect. Radiation can result in leaflet thickening,
retraction, and calcification, often in association with annular and
chordal involvement and some degree of mitral stenosis. Chronic MR
occurs frequently after prior MI(s) associated with changes in LV size,
shape, and function. Similar mechanisms of annular dilation and ventricular remodeling contribute to the MR that occurs among patients
with nonischemic forms of dilated cardiomyopathy once the LV enddiastolic dimension reaches 6 cm. The MR associated with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is usually dynamic in
nature and dependent on systolic anterior motion of the anterior mitral
valve leaflet into a narrowed LV outflow tract. Patients with chronic
persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may develop atrial remodeling and
annular dilation with inadequate leaflet lengthening and MR (atrial
functional MR). Secondary MR due to LV remodeling is more frequently encountered in the community than secondary MR that occurs
in association with AF and annular dilation. Annular calcification can
result in MR when it encroaches on the leaflets or results in decreased
sphincteric function and is especially prevalent among patients with
advanced renal disease and is commonly observed in women >65 years
of age with hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Irrespective of cause,
chronic severe MR is often progressive because enlargement of the left
atrium (LA) places tension on the posterior mitral leaflet, pulling it further away from the mitral orifice and thereby aggravating the valvular
dysfunction. Similarly, LV dilation increases the regurgitation, which,
in turn, enlarges the LA and LV further, resulting in a vicious circle;
hence the aphorism, “MR begets MR.”
■ PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
The resistance to LV emptying (LV afterload) is reduced in patients
with MR. As a consequence, the LV is decompressed into the LA during ejection, and with the reduction in LV size during systole, there
is a rapid decline in LV tension. The initial compensation to MR is
more complete LV emptying. However, LV volume increases progressively with time as the severity of the regurgitation increases and as
LV contractile function deteriorates. This increase in LV volume is
often accompanied by a reduced forward cardiac output (CO). LV
compliance is often increased, and thus, LV diastolic pressure does not
increase until late in the course. The regurgitant volume varies directly
with the LV systolic pressure and the size of the regurgitant orifice;
the latter, in turn, is influenced by the extent of LV and mitral annular
dilation. Because ejection fraction (EF) rises in severe MR in the presence of normal LV function, even a modest reduction in this parameter
(<60%) reflects significant contractile dysfunction.
During early diastole, as the distended LA empties, there is a particularly rapid y descent in the absence of accompanying MS. A brief,
early diastolic LA-LV pressure gradient (often generating a rapid filling
sound [S3
] and mid-diastolic murmur masquerading as MS) may occur
in patients with pure, severe MR as a result of the very rapid flow of
blood across a normal-sized mitral orifice.
Measurements of LV ejection fraction (LVEF), CO, pulmonary
arterial (PA) systolic pressure, regurgitant volume, regurgitant fraction
(RF), and the effective regurgitant orifice area can be obtained during
a careful Doppler echocardiographic examination. These measurements can also be obtained accurately with cardiac magnetic resonance
(CMR) imaging, although this technology is not widely available. Left
and right heart catheterization with contrast ventriculography is used
less frequently. Chronic, severe MR is defined by a regurgitant volume
≥60 mL/beat, regurgitant fraction (RF) ≥50%, and effective regurgitant
orifice area ≥0.40 cm2
. In patients with secondary MR, in whom the
severity of MR can be underappreciated using echocardiographic/
Doppler techniques, lesser degrees of regurgitation may carry relatively
greater prognostic weight. The adverse prognosis in secondary MR
related to adverse LV remodeling is intimately related to the degree of
myocardial dysfunction.
LA Compliance In acute severe MR, the regurgitant volume is
delivered into a normal-sized LA having normal or reduced compliance. As a result, LA pressures rise markedly for any increase in LA
volume. The v wave in the LA pressure pulse is usually prominent,
LA and pulmonary venous pressures are markedly elevated, and pulmonary edema is common. Because of the rapid rise in LA pressures
during ventricular systole, the murmur of acute MR is early in timing
and decrescendo in configuration ending well before S2
, as a reflection
of the progressive diminution in the LV-LA pressure gradient. LV systolic function in acute MR may be normal, hyperdynamic, or reduced,
depending on the clinical context.
Patients with chronic severe MR, on the other hand, develop marked
LA enlargement and increased LA compliance with little if any increase
in LA and pulmonary venous pressures for any increase in LA volume.
The LA v wave is relatively less prominent. The murmur of chronic MR
is classically holosystolic in timing and plateau in configuration, as a
reflection of the near-constant LV-LA pressure gradient. These patients
usually complain of severe fatigue and exhaustion secondary to a low
forward CO, whereas symptoms resulting from pulmonary congestion
are less prominent initially; AF is almost invariably present once the
LA dilates significantly.
■ SYMPTOMS
Patients with chronic mild-to-moderate, isolated MR are usually
asymptomatic. This form of LV volume overload is well tolerated.
Fatigue, exertional dyspnea, and orthopnea are the most prominent
complaints in patients with chronic severe MR. Palpitations are common and may signify the onset of AF. Late-onset right-sided heart
failure, with painful hepatic congestion, ankle edema, distended neck
veins, ascites, and secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR), occurs in
patients with MR who have associated pulmonary vascular disease
and pulmonary hypertension. Acute pulmonary edema is common in
patients with acute severe MR.
■ PHYSICAL FINDINGS
In patients with chronic severe MR, the arterial pressure is usually normal, although the carotid arterial pulse may show a sharp, low-volume
upstroke owing to the reduced forward CO. A systolic thrill is often
palpable at the cardiac apex, the LV is hyperdynamic with a brisk systolic impulse and a palpable rapid-filling wave (S3
), and the apex beat
is often displaced laterally.
In patients with acute severe MR, the arterial pressure may be reduced
with a narrow pulse pressure, the jugular venous pressure and waveforms may be normal or increased and exaggerated, the apical impulse is
not displaced, and signs of pulmonary congestion are prominent.
Auscultation S1
is generally absent, soft, or buried in the holosystolic murmur of chronic, severe MR. In patients with severe MR, the
aortic valve may close prematurely (due to the reduced forward cardiac
output), resulting in wide but physiologic splitting of S2
. A low-pitched
S3
occurring 0.12–0.17 s after the aortic valve closure sound, i.e., at the
completion of the rapid-filling phase of the LV, is believed to be caused
by the sudden tensing of the papillary muscles, chordae tendineae, and
valve leaflets. It may be followed by a short, rumbling, mid-diastolic
murmur, even in the absence of structural MS. In patients with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy, however, a third sound (S3
) may also
signify ventricular dysfunction. A fourth heart sound is often audible
in patients with acute severe MR who are in sinus rhythm. A presystolic
murmur is not ordinarily heard with isolated MR.
A systolic murmur of at least grade III/VI intensity is the most
characteristic auscultatory finding in chronic severe MR. It is usually
holosystolic (see Fig. 239-5A), but as previously noted, it is decrescendo
and ceases in mid-to-late systole in patients with acute severe MR. The
systolic murmur of chronic MR is usually most prominent at the apex
and radiates to the axilla. However, in patients with ruptured chordae
tendineae or primary involvement of the posterior mitral leaflet with
prolapse or flail, the regurgitant jet is eccentric, directed anteriorly, and
Mitral Regurgitation
1997CHAPTER 264
strikes the LA wall adjacent to the aortic root. In this situation, the systolic murmur is transmitted to the base of the heart and, therefore, may
be confused with the murmur of AS. In patients with ruptured chordae
tendineae, the systolic murmur may have a cooing or “seagull” quality,
whereas a flail leaflet may produce a murmur with a musical quality.
The systolic murmur of chronic MR not due to MVP is intensified by
isometric exercise (handgrip) but is reduced during the strain phase of
the Valsalva maneuver because of the associated decrease in LV preload.
■ LABORATORY EXAMINATION
ECG In patients with sinus rhythm, there is evidence of LA enlargement, but right atrial (RA) enlargement also may be present when pulmonary hypertension is significant and affects RV function and size.
Chronic severe MR is frequently associated with AF. In many patients,
there is no clear-cut ECG evidence of enlargement of either ventricle.
In others, the signs of eccentric LV hypertrophy are present.
Echocardiogram Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is indicated to assess the mechanism of the MR and its hemodynamic severity. LV function can be assessed from LV end-diastolic and end-systolic
volumes and EF. Observations can be made regarding leaflet structure
and function, chordal integrity, LA and LV size, annular calcification,
and regional and global LV systolic function. Doppler imaging should
demonstrate the width or area of the color flow MR jet within the LA,
the duration and intensity of the continuous wave Doppler signal, the
pulmonary venous flow contour, the early peak mitral inflow velocity,
and quantitative measures of regurgitant volume, RF, and effective
regurgitant orifice area. In addition, the PA pressures (PAPs) can be
estimated from the TR jet velocity. TTE is also indicated to follow the
course of patients with chronic MR and to provide rapid assessment for
any clinical change. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides
greater anatomic detail than TTE (see Fig. 241-5). Exercise testing with
TTE can be useful to assess exercise capacity as well as any dynamic
change in MR severity, PA systolic pressures, and biventricular function, for patients in whom there is a discrepancy between clinical
findings and the results of other noninvasive testing.
Chest X-Ray The LA and LV are the dominant chambers in
chronic MR. Late in the course of the disease, the LA may be massively enlarged and forms the right border of the cardiac silhouette.
Pulmonary venous congestion, interstitial edema, and Kerley B lines
are sometimes noted. Marked calcification of the mitral leaflets occurs
commonly in patients with long-standing, combined rheumatic MR
and MS, as well as in patients with radiation-induced mitral valve disease. Calcification of the mitral annulus may be visualized, particularly
on the lateral view of the chest. Patients with acute severe MR may
have asymmetric pulmonary edema if the regurgitant jet is directed
predominantly to the orifice of an upper lobe pulmonary vein.
TREATMENT (FIGS. 264-1 AND 264-2)
Mitral Regurgitation
MEDICAL TREATMENT
The management of chronic severe MR depends to some degree on
its cause. Anticoagulation with either warfarin or a direct oral agent
(e.g., apixaban, rivaroxaban) should be provided if AF intervenes,
as guided by the CHA2
DS2
-VASc risk score. The direct oral anticoagulants should not be used if moderate or severe rheumatic mitral
Yes
No
MV surgery (1)
Primary
in Chap. 265. The rheumatic process produces rigidity, deformity,
and retraction of the valve cusps and commissural fusion, as well as
shortening, contraction, and fusion of the chordae tendineae. MR can
persist after resolution of the acute phase of infection and inflammation. MR may occur as a congenital anomaly (Chap. 269), most commonly as a defect of the endocardial cushions (atrioventricular cushion
defects). A cleft anterior mitral valve leaflet accompanies ostium
primum atrial septal defect. Radiation can result in leaflet thickening,
retraction, and calcification, often in association with annular and
chordal involvement and some degree of mitral stenosis. Chronic MR
occurs frequently after prior MI(s) associated with changes in LV size,
shape, and function. Similar mechanisms of annular dilation and ventricular remodeling contribute to the MR that occurs among patients
with nonischemic forms of dilated cardiomyopathy once the LV enddiastolic dimension reaches 6 cm. The MR associated with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is usually dynamic in
nature and dependent on systolic anterior motion of the anterior mitral
valve leaflet into a narrowed LV outflow tract. Patients with chronic
persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may develop atrial remodeling and
annular dilation with inadequate leaflet lengthening and MR (atrial
functional MR). Secondary MR due to LV remodeling is more frequently encountered in the community than secondary MR that occurs
in association with AF and annular dilation. Annular calcification can
result in MR when it encroaches on the leaflets or results in decreased
sphincteric function and is especially prevalent among patients with
advanced renal disease and is commonly observed in women >65 years
of age with hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Irrespective of cause,
chronic severe MR is often progressive because enlargement of the left
atrium (LA) places tension on the posterior mitral leaflet, pulling it further away from the mitral orifice and thereby aggravating the valvular
dysfunction. Similarly, LV dilation increases the regurgitation, which,
in turn, enlarges the LA and LV further, resulting in a vicious circle;
hence the aphorism, “MR begets MR.”
■ PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
The resistance to LV emptying (LV afterload) is reduced in patients
with MR. As a consequence, the LV is decompressed into the LA during ejection, and with the reduction in LV size during systole, there
is a rapid decline in LV tension. The initial compensation to MR is
more complete LV emptying. However, LV volume increases progressively with time as the severity of the regurgitation increases and as
LV contractile function deteriorates. This increase in LV volume is
often accompanied by a reduced forward cardiac output (CO). LV
compliance is often increased, and thus, LV diastolic pressure does not
increase until late in the course. The regurgitant volume varies directly
with the LV systolic pressure and the size of the regurgitant orifice;
the latter, in turn, is influenced by the extent of LV and mitral annular
dilation. Because ejection fraction (EF) rises in severe MR in the presence of normal LV function, even a modest reduction in this parameter
(<60%) reflects significant contractile dysfunction.
During early diastole, as the distended LA empties, there is a particularly rapid y descent in the absence of accompanying MS. A brief,
early diastolic LA-LV pressure gradient (often generating a rapid filling
sound [S3
] and mid-diastolic murmur masquerading as MS) may occur
in patients with pure, severe MR as a result of the very rapid flow of
blood across a normal-sized mitral orifice.
Measurements of LV ejection fraction (LVEF), CO, pulmonary
arterial (PA) systolic pressure, regurgitant volume, regurgitant fraction
(RF), and the effective regurgitant orifice area can be obtained during
a careful Doppler echocardiographic examination. These measurements can also be obtained accurately with cardiac magnetic resonance
(CMR) imaging, although this technology is not widely available. Left
and right heart catheterization with contrast ventriculography is used
less frequently. Chronic, severe MR is defined by a regurgitant volume
≥60 mL/beat, regurgitant fraction (RF) ≥50%, and effective regurgitant
orifice area ≥0.40 cm2
. In patients with secondary MR, in whom the
severity of MR can be underappreciated using echocardiographic/
Doppler techniques, lesser degrees of regurgitation may carry relatively
greater prognostic weight. The adverse prognosis in secondary MR
related to adverse LV remodeling is intimately related to the degree of
myocardial dysfunction.
LA Compliance In acute severe MR, the regurgitant volume is
delivered into a normal-sized LA having normal or reduced compliance. As a result, LA pressures rise markedly for any increase in LA
volume. The v wave in the LA pressure pulse is usually prominent,
LA and pulmonary venous pressures are markedly elevated, and pulmonary edema is common. Because of the rapid rise in LA pressures
during ventricular systole, the murmur of acute MR is early in timing
and decrescendo in configuration ending well before S2
, as a reflection
of the progressive diminution in the LV-LA pressure gradient. LV systolic function in acute MR may be normal, hyperdynamic, or reduced,
depending on the clinical context.
Patients with chronic severe MR, on the other hand, develop marked
LA enlargement and increased LA compliance with little if any increase
in LA and pulmonary venous pressures for any increase in LA volume.
The LA v wave is relatively less prominent. The murmur of chronic MR
is classically holosystolic in timing and plateau in configuration, as a
reflection of the near-constant LV-LA pressure gradient. These patients
usually complain of severe fatigue and exhaustion secondary to a low
forward CO, whereas symptoms resulting from pulmonary congestion
are less prominent initially; AF is almost invariably present once the
LA dilates significantly.
■ SYMPTOMS
Patients with chronic mild-to-moderate, isolated MR are usually
asymptomatic. This form of LV volume overload is well tolerated.
Fatigue, exertional dyspnea, and orthopnea are the most prominent
complaints in patients with chronic severe MR. Palpitations are common and may signify the onset of AF. Late-onset right-sided heart
failure, with painful hepatic congestion, ankle edema, distended neck
veins, ascites, and secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR), occurs in
patients with MR who have associated pulmonary vascular disease
and pulmonary hypertension. Acute pulmonary edema is common in
patients with acute severe MR.
■ PHYSICAL FINDINGS
In patients with chronic severe MR, the arterial pressure is usually normal, although the carotid arterial pulse may show a sharp, low-volume
upstroke owing to the reduced forward CO. A systolic thrill is often
palpable at the cardiac apex, the LV is hyperdynamic with a brisk systolic impulse and a palpable rapid-filling wave (S3
), and the apex beat
is often displaced laterally.
In patients with acute severe MR, the arterial pressure may be reduced
with a narrow pulse pressure, the jugular venous pressure and waveforms may be normal or increased and exaggerated, the apical impulse is
not displaced, and signs of pulmonary congestion are prominent.
Auscultation S1
is generally absent, soft, or buried in the holosystolic murmur of chronic, severe MR. In patients with severe MR, the
aortic valve may close prematurely (due to the reduced forward cardiac
output), resulting in wide but physiologic splitting of S2
. A low-pitched
S3
occurring 0.12–0.17 s after the aortic valve closure sound, i.e., at the
completion of the rapid-filling phase of the LV, is believed to be caused
by the sudden tensing of the papillary muscles, chordae tendineae, and
valve leaflets. It may be followed by a short, rumbling, mid-diastolic
murmur, even in the absence of structural MS. In patients with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy, however, a third sound (S3
) may also
signify ventricular dysfunction. A fourth heart sound is often audible
in patients with acute severe MR who are in sinus rhythm. A presystolic
murmur is not ordinarily heard with isolated MR.
A systolic murmur of at least grade III/VI intensity is the most
characteristic auscultatory finding in chronic severe MR. It is usually
holosystolic (see Fig. 239-5A), but as previously noted, it is decrescendo
and ceases in mid-to-late systole in patients with acute severe MR. The
systolic murmur of chronic MR is usually most prominent at the apex
and radiates to the axilla. However, in patients with ruptured chordae
tendineae or primary involvement of the posterior mitral leaflet with
prolapse or flail, the regurgitant jet is eccentric, directed anteriorly, and
Mitral Regurgitation
1997CHAPTER 264
strikes the LA wall adjacent to the aortic root. In this situation, the systolic murmur is transmitted to the base of the heart and, therefore, may
be confused with the murmur of AS. In patients with ruptured chordae
tendineae, the systolic murmur may have a cooing or “seagull” quality,
whereas a flail leaflet may produce a murmur with a musical quality.
The systolic murmur of chronic MR not due to MVP is intensified by
isometric exercise (handgrip) but is reduced during the strain phase of
the Valsalva maneuver because of the associated decrease in LV preload.
■ LABORATORY EXAMINATION
ECG In patients with sinus rhythm, there is evidence of LA enlargement, but right atrial (RA) enlargement also may be present when pulmonary hypertension is significant and affects RV function and size.
Chronic severe MR is frequently associated with AF. In many patients,
there is no clear-cut ECG evidence of enlargement of either ventricle.
In others, the signs of eccentric LV hypertrophy are present.
Echocardiogram Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is indicated to assess the mechanism of the MR and its hemodynamic severity. LV function can be assessed from LV end-diastolic and end-systolic
volumes and EF. Observations can be made regarding leaflet structure
and function, chordal integrity, LA and LV size, annular calcification,
and regional and global LV systolic function. Doppler imaging should
demonstrate the width or area of the color flow MR jet within the LA,
the duration and intensity of the continuous wave Doppler signal, the
pulmonary venous flow contour, the early peak mitral inflow velocity,
and quantitative measures of regurgitant volume, RF, and effective
regurgitant orifice area. In addition, the PA pressures (PAPs) can be
estimated from the TR jet velocity. TTE is also indicated to follow the
course of patients with chronic MR and to provide rapid assessment for
any clinical change. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides
greater anatomic detail than TTE (see Fig. 241-5). Exercise testing with
TTE can be useful to assess exercise capacity as well as any dynamic
change in MR severity, PA systolic pressures, and biventricular function, for patients in whom there is a discrepancy between clinical
findings and the results of other noninvasive testing.
Chest X-Ray The LA and LV are the dominant chambers in
chronic MR. Late in the course of the disease, the LA may be massively enlarged and forms the right border of the cardiac silhouette.
Pulmonary venous congestion, interstitial edema, and Kerley B lines
are sometimes noted. Marked calcification of the mitral leaflets occurs
commonly in patients with long-standing, combined rheumatic MR
and MS, as well as in patients with radiation-induced mitral valve disease. Calcification of the mitral annulus may be visualized, particularly
on the lateral view of the chest. Patients with acute severe MR may
have asymmetric pulmonary edema if the regurgitant jet is directed
predominantly to the orifice of an upper lobe pulmonary vein.
TREATMENT (FIGS. 264-1 AND 264-2)
Mitral Regurgitation
MEDICAL TREATMENT
The management of chronic severe MR depends to some degree on
its cause. Anticoagulation with either warfarin or a direct oral agent
(e.g., apixaban, rivaroxaban) should be provided if AF intervenes,
as guided by the CHA2
DS2
-VASc risk score. The direct oral anticoagulants should not be used if moderate or severe rheumatic mitral
Yes
No
MV surgery (1)
Primary mitral
regurgitation
Severe MR (VC ≥0.7 cm,
RVol ≥60 mL, RF ≥50%,
ERO ≥0.40 cm2)
No symptoms due to MR
(Stage C)
Symptoms due to MR
(Stage D)
(regardless of LV
function)
High or prohibitive
surgical risk with
anatomy favorable
for transcatheter
approach and life
expectancy >1 y
Expected surgical
mortality <1% with
>95% likelihood of
successful and
durable repair without
residual MR
Progressive
increase in LV
size or decrease
in LVEF on at
least 3 studies
LV systolic dysfunction
(Stage C2)
(LVEF ≤60% or
ESD ≥40 mm)
Normal LV systolic
function (Stage C1)
(LVEF >60% or
ESD <40 mm)
Degenerative MV
disease
Successful and durable
repair possible
Rheumatic MV
disease
Successful and durable
repair possible
MV surgery at
primary or CVC (1)
MV repair at
primary or CVC (2a)
Transcatheter edge-toedge MV repair (2a)
MV repair or
replacement (2b) MV repair at CVC (2b)
FIGURE 264-1 Management of primary mitral regurgitation (MR). See legend for Fig. 261-4 for explanation of treatment recommendations (Class I, IIa, IIb) and disease stages
(B, C1, C2, D). Preoperative coronary angiography should be performed routinely as determined by age, symptoms, and coronary risk factors. Cardiac catheterization and
angiography may also be helpful when there is a discrepancy between clinical and noninvasive findings. Mitral valve repair is strongly preferred over valve replacement whenever
feasible for surgical treatment of primary MR. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is reserved for high or prohibitive surgical risk patients with appropriate anatomy on
transesophageal imaging. CVC, comprehensive valve center; EF, ejection fraction; ERO, effective regurgitant orifice; ESD, end-systolic dimension; LV, left ventricular; MV, mitral
valve; RF, regurgitant fraction; RVol, regurgitant volume; VC, vena contracta. (Reproduced with permission from CM Otto et al: ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients
with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 143:e72, 2021.)
1998 PART 6 Disorders of the Cardiovascular System
stenosis is also present; they are also not approved for use in patients
with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Cardioversion should be
considered depending on the clinical context, AF chronicity, and
LA size. In contrast to the acute setting, there are no large, longterm prospective studies to substantiate the use of vasodilators
for the treatment of chronic, isolated severe MR with preserved
LV systolic function in the absence of systemic hypertension. The
severity of secondary MR in the setting of an ischemic or dilated
cardiomyopathy may diminish with aggressive guideline-directed
therapy (GDMT) of heart failure including the use of diuretics for
decongestion, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)
inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-neprilysin
inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium-glucose
cotransporter-2 inhibitors and biventricular pacing (cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT]) when indicated. Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of IE is indicated for MR patients with a prior
history of IE. Asymptomatic patients with severe MR in sinus
rhythm with normal LV size and systolic function should avoid
isometric forms of exercise.
Patients with acute severe MR require urgent stabilization and
preparation for surgery. Diuretics, intravenous vasodilators (particularly sodium nitroprusside), and even mechanical support may be
needed for patients with post-MI papillary muscle rupture or other
forms of acute severe MR.
SURGICAL TREATMENT
In the selection of patients with chronic, severe, primary MR
for surgical treatment, the often slowly progressive nature of the
condition must be balanced against the immediate and long-term
risks associated with operation. These risks are significantly lower
for primary valve repair than for valve replacement (Table 264-2).
Repair usually consists of valve reconstruction using a variety of
valvuloplasty techniques and insertion of an annuloplasty ring.
Repair spares the patient the long-term adverse consequences of
valve replacement, including thromboembolic and hemorrhagic
complications in the case of mechanical prostheses and late valve
failure necessitating repeat valve replacement in the case of bioprostheses. In addition, by preserving the integrity of the papillary muscles, subvalvular apparatus, and chordae tendineae, mitral
repair and valvuloplasty maintain LV function to a relatively greater
degree than does valve replacement.
Surgery for chronic severe primary MR is indicated once symptoms occur, especially if valve repair is feasible (Fig. 264-1). Surgery
should also be recommended for asymptomatic patients with LV
dysfunction characterized by an EF ≤60% or an LV end-systolic
dimension (LV ESD) ≥40 mm. Other indications for early consideration of mitral valve repair in asymptomatic patients include a progressive decrease in LVEF or increase in LV ESD on serial imaging
Secondary mitral
regurgitation
GDMT supervised by a
HF specialist (1)
LV EF ≥50%
Persistent symptoms on
optimal GDMT and AF Rx
MV surgery
(2b)
MV surgery
(2b)
MV surgery*
(2a)
Transcatheter edge-toedge MV repair (2a)
Persistent symptoms on
optimal GDMT
Undergoing
CABG
Mitral anatomy favorable
LV EF 20–50%
LV ESD ≤70 mm
PASP ≤70 mm Hg
LV EF <50%
Severe MR Stage D
RVol ≥60 mL, RF ≥50%,
ERO ≥0.40 cm2)
FIGURE 264-2 Management of secondary mitral regurgitation. See legend for Fig. 261-4 for explanation of treatment recommendations (Class I, IIa, IIb) and disease stages
(B, C1, C2, D). Preoperative coronary angiography should be performed routinely as determined by age, symptoms, and coronary risk factors. Cardiac catheterization and
angiography may also be helpful when there is a discrepancy between clinical and noninvasive findings. Surgery is recommended for patients with left ventricular ejection
fraction (LVEF) >50%. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is reasonable is selected patients after guideline-directed management and therapy (GDMT) has been optimized.
*
MV replacement may be preferred over MV repair for ischemic MR; AF, atrial fibrillation; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; EF, ejection fraction; ERO, effective regurgitant
orifice; ESD, end-systolic dimension; HF, heart failure; LV, left ventricular; MR, mitral regurgitation, MV, mitral valve; PASP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure; RF, regurgitant
fraction; RVol, regurgitant volume; Rx, treatment. (Reproduced with permission from CM Otto et al: ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart
disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 143:e72, 2021.)
TABLE 264-2 Mortality Rates after Mitral Valve Surgerya
OPERATION NUMBER
UNADJUSTED OPERATIVE
MORTALITY (%)
MVR (isolated) 10,699 4.5
MVR + CAB 3509 9.6
MVRp 12,424 1.2
MVRp + CAB 4093 5.4
a
Data are for calendar year 2018 during which 1088 participant groups reported
a total of 287,872 procedures. Surgical mitral valve commissurotomy cases are
included in the mitral valve repair procedures.
Abbreviations: CAB, coronary artery bypass; MVR, mitral valve replacement; MVRp,
mitral valve repair.
Source: Adapted from ME Bowdish et al: Ann Thorac Surg 109:1646, 2020.
Mitral Valve Prolapse
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع