2258 PART 8 Critical Care Medicine
low-income neighborhoods, is likely a contributing factor but does not
appear to account for the entirety of the elevated SCD rate in blacks.
Alternatively, individuals of Hispanic ethnicity appear to have lower
rates of SCD, despite having a higher prevalence of cardiac risk factors.
It appears that the incidence of SCD may be relatively low among Asian
populations as well, both within the United States and globally. These
gender and racial differences in SCD/SCA incidence and survival are
poorly understood and warrant further research.
TABLE 306-1 Distinction between Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Death
TERM DEFINITION QUALIFIERS MECHANISMS
Cardiovascular collapse Sudden loss of effective circulation due to cardiac
and/or peripheral vascular factors that may reverse
spontaneously (e.g., neurocardiogenic syncope,
vasovagal syncope) or require interventions (e.g.,
cardiac arrest).
Broad term that includes cardiac
arrest and transient events that
characteristically revert spontaneously
presenting as syncope.
Same as cardiac arrest, plus
vasodepressor syncope or other causes
of transient loss of blood flow.
Cardiac arrest Abrupt cessation of cardiac function resulting in
loss of effective circulation that may be reversible by
prompt emergency medical intervention but will lead
to death in its absence.
Rare spontaneous reversions; likelihood
of successful intervention relates to
mechanism of arrest, clinical setting,
availability of emergency medical
services, and prompt return of circulation.
Ventricular fibrillation, ventricular
tachycardia, asystole, bradycardia,
pulseless electrical activity, noncardiac
mechanical factors (e.g., pulmonary
embolism).
Sudden cardiac death Sudden unexpected death attributed to cardiac
arrest, which if witnessed occurs within 1 h of
symptom onset.
In unwitnessed cases, the definition is
often expanded to include unexpected
deaths where the subject was
documented to be well within the
preceding 24 h.
Same as cardiac arrest.
Source: Modified from RJ Myerburg, A Castellanos: Cardiovascular collapse, cardiac arrest, and sudden cardiac death, in Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine,
19th ed, DL Kasper et al (eds). New York, McGraw-Hill Education, 2015, pp. 1764–1771, Table 327-1.
0 3 HCM, ARVC 5
Coronary heart disease ~ 40–70%
White Men: 70%
Women and Black Men 40–50%
Asians < 40%
Valvular heart disease
1–5%
Idiopathic
VF/Others
A
Inherited arrhythmia
syndrome
(LQTS, BrS, CPVT, ERS, etc.)
1–2% in Western countries
10% in Asia Myocardial Substrates:
Myocardial scar
Hypertrophy
Fibrosis
Myocardial stretch
Electrical heterogeneity
Ion channel functional modification
Abnormal calcium handling
Cardiomyopathies
(NIDCM, HCM, ARVC, etc.)
10–15% in Western countries
30–35% in Asia
Triggers
Heart failure/Stretch
Ischemia
Myocardial inflammation
Vigorous exertion
Electrolyte abnormality
Environmental stress
Psychological stress/Depression
CPVT, LQTS
B
Age of SCD onset NIDCM
BrS, ERS
Coronary Heart Disease
Valvular Heart Disease
Population‐Based Risk Factors
Male sex
Black race
Diabetes
Current smoking
Hypertension
Chronic kidney disease
ECG features (QT, QRS prolongation, early repolarization, LVH)
Family history of SCD (genetics)
Diet low in N-3 PUFA
Atrial fibrillation
Obstructive sleep apnea
Heavy alcohol intake
Low magnesium levels
Sudden Cardiac Death
Causes
FIGURE 306-1 A. Proportionate causes, substrates, risk factors, and triggers of sudden cardiac death (SCD). B. Variation of causes by age of onset. (Reproduced with
permission from M Hayashi et al: The spectrum of epidemiology underlying sudden cardiac death. Circ Res 116:1887, 2015.)
■ RISK FACTORS (SEE FIG. 306-1)
The presence of overt structural heart disease and/or certain types
of inherited arrhythmia syndromes markedly elevates SCD risk (see
Chaps. 254 and 255). Preexisting CHD and HF are the most prevalent
predisposing cardiac conditions and are associated with a four- to
tenfold increase in SCD risk. Correspondingly, SCD shares many
of the same risk factors with CHD and HF, including hypertension,
diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, and smoking. Diabetes is a
2259Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Cardiac Death CHAPTER 306
particularly strong risk factor for SCD even in patients with established
CHD. Hypertension and resultant left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)
appear to be particularly important markers of SCD risk in blacks, in
whom the prevalence of these conditions is greater. Smoking markedly
elevates risk, and smoking cessation lowers risk particularly among
individuals who have not yet developed overt CHD. Serum cholesterol
appears to be more strongly related to SCD at younger ages, and the
benefits of cholesterol lowering on SCD incidence have not been firmly
established. There also appears to be a genetic component to SCD
risk that is distinct from that associated with other manifestations of
atherosclerosis. A history of SCD in a first-degree relative is associated
with an increased risk for SCD, and with the occurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) during acute MI, but is not associated with an
increased risk for acute MI. These data suggest that genetic factors may
predispose to fatal ventricular arrhythmia in the setting of ischemia,
rather than to CHD in general.
Obstructive sleep apnea and seizure disorders are also associated
with increased SCD risk; the underlying mechanism is not clear but
may be due to hypoxia-induced cardiac arrest. Atrial fibrillation also
appears to be associated with an increased risk of SCD, which is partly,
but not entirely, accounted for by its association with underlying heart
disease. Patients with chronic kidney disease are also at higher SCD
risk with annualized SCD rates approaching 5.5% in patients undergoing dialysis. Electrolyte shifts and LVH, which are common in this
population, have been suggested to play a role. There are also potential dietary influences on SCD risk. Individuals with higher intakes
of polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly n-3 fatty acids, and other
components of a Mediterranean-style diet have lower SCD risks in
observational studies, possibly due to antiarrhythmic effects of dietary
components. Low levels of alcohol intake may be beneficial, but heavy
intake (>3 drinks/day) appears to elevate risk.
■ PRECIPITATING FACTORS
SCD/SCA occurs with higher frequency at certain times, locations,
and in association with certain activities and exposures. Although not
consistently observed across all studies, there does appear to be circadian variations in the incidence of SCD and cardiac arrest, with peaks
in incidence in the morning hours and again in the later afternoon.
There is also seasonal variability in SCD rates, which may be related to
temperature and light exposure. Rates are highest during winter in the
northern hemisphere and summer in the southern hemisphere. SCD
rates also acutely peak during disasters such as earthquakes and terrorist attacks. SCA arrests are more likely to occur in certain locations as
well, with notable clustering around train stations, airports, and other
public places where there is significant population transit. SCD rates
tend to be higher in urban areas and individuals that live near major
roadways are at elevated SCD risk. There is also a well-recognized
acute elevation in SCD risk that occurs during or shortly after bouts
of vigorous exertion, and men appear to be more susceptible. Habitual exercise and training lower this acute risk but do not eliminate it
entirely. Exertion-associated SCDs are particularly tragic and highly
publicized when they occur in highly trained athletes; however, the
majority of such deaths actually occur in the general population. The
common thread amongst these precipitating factors is likely heightened autonomic tone, which can promote ischemia and has direct
proarrhythmia and electrophysiologic actions that lower the threshold
for sustained VF.
CAUSES OF SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH
■ UNDERLYING HEART DISEASE (FIG. 306-1)
Our understanding regarding the diseases that contribute to SCD is
derived primarily from autopsy series and cardiac evaluations in cardiac arrest survivors, which are highly variable in level of detail. Despite
the limitations of these data, it is generally accepted that sudden death
due to cardiac causes is most commonly due to CAD, although the
proportion with CAD varies markedly by age, race, and sex. It is estimated that ~70% of SCDs in white men are due to CAD, as compared
with only 40–50% in women and blacks. The proportion of SCDs with
underlying CAD may be even lower in Asian ethnicities. Recent data
suggest that the proportion of SCDs with CAD on autopsy may be
declining in some parts of Europe (Fig. 306-2A) and the United States,
and, at the same time, increasing in parts of Japan and other parts of
Asia. Beyond CAD, nonischemic cardiomyopathies (hypertrophic,
dilated, and infiltrative) are the second most frequent cause of SCD in
the United States and European countries. Other less common causes
include valvular heart disease, myocarditis, myocardial hypertrophy
(often from hypertension), and rare primary electrical heart diseases
such as long QT and Brugada syndromes. On average, 5–10% of SCA
victims do not have a significant cardiac abnormality at the time of
autopsy or after extensive premortem cardiac evaluation, and this also
varies by gender and race. Before 35 years of age, atherosclerotic CAD
accounts for a much smaller proportion of deaths, with hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy (HCM), coronary artery anomalies, myocarditis,
arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and primary ion
channelopathies accounting for a significant number of these deaths.
■ CARDIAC RHYTHMS AND SUDDEN DEATH
The initial rhythm found when EMS arrive at the scene of an outof-hospital cardiac arrest is an important indication of the potential
cause of the arrest and of the prognosis. In the early days of EMS systems, over half of victims were found in VF, giving rise to the hypothesis that ischemic VF or ventricular tachycardia (VT) degenerating to
VF was the most common event. The proportion of cardiac arrests
found in VF has decreased markedly since the 1970s, to only 20–25%
in more recent studies, and PEA or asystole are now the most common
scenarios (Fig. 306-2B). However, the vast majority of cardiac arrests
are not monitored at the time of collapse, and since arrhythmias are
inherently unstable once hemodynamic collapse occurs, the rhythm
at the time of EMS arrival may not reflect the rhythm that initially
precipitated the SCA as VF and primary bradycardias can degenerate
into asystole. Nonetheless, VF as an initial rhythm still predominates
in public locations or in other situations when there is a short time
frame between witnessed arrest and arrival of EMS, suggesting that
VF remains a common initial precipitating rhythm. However, there
are also data to support an absolute decrease in VF incidence. Proposed explanations include decreases in underlying CHD incidence,
increased used of beta blockers in CHD, and implantable cardioverter
defibrillators (ICD) in high-risk patients. There also appears to be an
increase of PEA incidence over the past several years, suggesting that
the proportion of SCD due to abrupt hemodynamic collapse in the
absence of preceding fatal arrhythmia may be increasing. Proposed
explanations for these proportional changes in PEA versus VF include
the aging of the population and the increased prevalence of end-stage
cardiovascular disease and other severe comorbidities. These older,
sicker patients may be more likely to have arrests in the home and to
have acute precipitants leading to PEA (i.e., respiratory, metabolic, vascular), and/or be less likely to sustain VF up to the point of EMS arrival.
■ DISEASE-SPECIFIC MECHANISMS
CAD can cause SCD through several mechanisms (Table 306-2). The
most common cause is acute MI or transient myocardial ischemia that
leads to polymorphic VT and VF (see Chap. 255). Other primary
mechanisms include severe bradyarrhythmias such as heart block
with a slow escape rhythm, or PEA due to a massive MI or associated
myocardial rupture. Areas of ventricular scar from prior infarcts
increase the predisposition to reentrant VT, which often degenerates
to VF. Once patients have suffered an MI, their risk of SCD elevates
up to tenfold, with the highest absolute rates in the first 30 days after
MI. The mechanisms underlying SCD vary at different time points
after MI, with nonarrhythmic causes such as myocardial rupture
and/or extensive reinfarction predominating early, within the first
1–2 months, and ischemic polymorphic VT and/or scar-related ventricular arrhythmias prevailing later. VT and sudden death can, and
often do, occur years after an initial MI.
Cardiomyopathies and Other Forms of Structural Heart
Disease Scar-mediated reentrant VT can also occur in a host of
2260 PART 8 Critical Care Medicine
0%
2005–06 2007
Overall VT or VF Asystole or PEA
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
35%
Survival to Discharge
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Temporal Changes in Causes of Sudden
Cardiac Death on Autopsy
Proportion of Treated Cardiac Arrest
with Ventricular Fibrillation as Initial
Rhythm
A B
60%
80%
100%
74% 73%
66%
Ischemic
Non-Ischemic
40%
50%
60%
70%
0%
20%
40% 26% 27%
34%
0%
10%
20%
30%
1979–1980 1989–1990 1999–2000 2006–2007
20%
Proportion of Acute MI Patients with Low
LVEF (<30–35%)
C D
10%
15%
0%
5%
Bauer EHJ 2009 Voller H Europace
2011
Jordaens EHJ 2001 Avezum AJC 2008
17%
8.3%
5%
2.5%
60%
47%
40%
25%
1998–2002 2003–2007 2008–2012
FIGURE 306-2 Changing epidemiology of sudden cardiac death/arrest. A. The proportion of sudden cardiac deaths attributable to coronary artery disease among individuals
without a history of heart disease in Finland over time. Postmortem examinations are mandatory in Finland, which has the highest autopsy rate in the Western world.
(J Junttila et al: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2016). B. Proportion of treated cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation as first recorded rhythm in Seattle, Washington,
United States, over time. (Data from L Cobb et al: JAMA 288:3008, 2002, and G Nichol et al: JAMA 300:1423, 2008.) C. Rates of overall survival and survival from shockable and
nonshockable rhythms to hospital discharge among 70,027 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests across the United States from 2005 to 2012 (Cardiac Arrest to Enhance Survival
Registry). (Reproduced with permission from P Chan et al: Recent trends in survival from out-of-hospital cardiac attacks in United States. Circulation 130:1876, 2014.)
D. Proportion of myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular ejection fractions <30–35% in myocardial infarction registries over time.
nonischemic cardiomyopathies in which replacement fibrosis and/or
inflammatory ventricular infiltrates occur (Chap. 254). In congenital
heart disease, surgical scars created during corrective surgery, such as
those performed to correct ventricular septal defects in tetralogy of
Fallot, can also serve as the substrate for ventricular reentry. Other
common predisposing processes such as LVH, ventricular stretch due
to fluid overload, and cardiomyocyte dysfunction can result in electrical heterogeneity and other electrophysiologic changes that predispose
to ventricular arrhythmias, including ion channel alterations that
prolong action potential duration, impair cellular calcium handling,
and diminish cellular coupling. These processes occur in a wide variety of diseases associated with depressed ventricular function and/or
hypertrophy, including CAD, valvular heart disease, myocarditis, and
nonischemic cardiomyopathies.
Absence of Structural Heart Disease In the absence of structural heart disease, VF can be due to an inherited ion channel abnormality, as in long QT and Brugada syndromes (Chap. 255), rapid atrial
fibrillation associated with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (Chap.
249), or drug toxicities, such as polymorphic VT due to drugs that
prolong the QT interval (Chap. 255). PEA can result from pulmonary
emboli, exsanguination, or the terminal phase of respiratory arrest.
MANAGEMENT OF CARDIAC ARREST
As the ability to predict SCA in the population is very limited, community approaches to reduce death focus on the rapid identification
of victims and implementation of resuscitation measures by those
who first encounter the victim, most likely the lay public, who ideally
summon EMS and initiate basic life-support measures with chest
compressions. The approach is codified in the “out-of-hospital chain
of survival,” which includes: (1) initial evaluation and recognition of
the SCA; (2) rapid initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
with an emphasis on chest compressions; (3) defibrillation as quickly
as possible usually with an automatic external defibrillation applied
by the lay rescuer or EMT; (4) advanced life support and postcardiac
arrest care. There have been major advances in each of these areas
and survival rates to hospital discharge for out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest have increased, particularly for patients found in VT or VF,
where survival rates can approach 30% in some regions (Fig. 306-2C).
Overall survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are also higher
for patients receiving CPR, with recent studies in Europe reporting
survival rates of 16%. Multiple studies have pointed to socioeconomic
disparities in the administration of CPR and application of automatic
external defibrillators (AEDs) contributing to reduced survival rates
from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in black and Hispanic populations
in the United States.
The initial goal of resuscitation is to achieve the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Success is strongly related to the time
between collapse and initiation of resuscitation, decreasing markedly
after 5 min, and the rhythm at the time of EMT arrival, being best for
VT, worse for VF, and poor for PEA and asystole. Outcomes are also
determined by the age, clinical state, and comorbidities of the victim
prior to the arrest.
■ INITIAL EVALUATION AND INITIATION OF CPR
The rescuer should check for a response from the victim, shout for
help, and call or ask someone else to call their local emergency number
(e.g., 911), ideally on a cell phone that can be placed on speaker mode
2261Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Cardiac Death CHAPTER 306
TABLE 306-2 Causes of Cardiovascular Collapse and Sudden Cardiac Arrest
CAUSE PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC SUBSTRATE RHYTHM PRESENTATION
Cardiac Causes
Coronary artery disease
Atherosclerotic, coronary spasm, congenital anomalies
Acute myocardial ischemia/infarction, ventricular
rupture, tamponade
Ventricular scar from healed infarction
Polymorphic VT/VF
Bradyarrhythmia
Pulseless electrical activity
VT
VF
Cardiomyopathies
Dilated, hypertrophic, ARVC, infiltrative disease, valvular
disease with LV failure
Ventricular scar
Ventricular hypertrophy
Pump failure
VT
Polymorphic VT/VF
Pulseless electrical activity
Bradyarrhythmia
Congenital heart disease
(tetralogy of Fallot, VSD, others)
Ventricular scar from surgical repair
Hypertrophy
VT
Bradyarrhythmias
Polymorphic VT/VF
Aortic stenosis Obstruction to outflow
Ventricular hypertrophy
Bradyarrhythmia
Pulseless electrical activity
Bradyarrhythmia
Polymorphic VT/VF
Mitral valve prolapse/mitral regurgitation Pump failure
Ventricular scar
VT
Polymorphic VT/VF
Arrhythmia syndromes without structural heart disease:
Genetic:
Long QT
Brugada
CPVT
Idiopathic VF, early repolarization
Drug toxicities (acquired long QT, others)
Electrolyte abnormalities (severe hypokalemia)
Abnormal cellular electrophysiology Polymorphic VT/VF
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome Accessory atrioventricular connection Preexcited AF/VF
Noncardiac Causes of Cardiovascular Collapse
Pulmonary embolism PEA
Stroke PEA, bradyarrhythmia
Aortic dissection PEA, VF
Exsanguination PEA
Tension pneumothorax PEA
Sepsis PEA
Neurogenic PEA, bradyarrhythmia
Drug overdose PEA, bradyarrhythmia
Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; ARVC, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; CPVT, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia; LV, left ventricle;
PEA, pulseless electrical activity; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VSD, ventricular septal defect; VT, ventricular tachycardia.
■ RHYTHM-BASED MANAGEMENT (SEE FIG. 306-3)
The rapidity with which defibrillation/cardioversion is achieved is an
important predictor of outcome. A defibrillator, most often an AED,
should be applied as soon as available. AEDs are easily used by lay rescuers and trained first responders, such as police officers and trained
security guards. When the arrest is witnessed, the use of AEDs by lay
responders can improve cardiac arrest survival rates. Once patches are
applied to the chest, a brief pause in chest compressions is required to
allow the AED to record the rhythm. An AED will advise delivery of a
shock if the recorded rhythm meets criteria for VF or VT. Chest compressions are continued while the defibrillator is being charged. As soon
as a diagnosis of VF or VT is established, a 200 joule biphasic waveform
shock should be delivered. Chest compressions are resumed immediately and continue for 2 min until the next rhythm check. If VT/VF is
still present, a second maximal energy shock is delivered. This sequence
is continued until personnel to administer advanced life support are
available or ROSC is achieved. Electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythm strips
produced by the AED should be retrieved, as the initial rhythm can be
an important consideration in determining the cause of the arrest and
to guide further therapy and evaluation if resuscitation is successful.
at the patient’s side such that the responding dispatcher can provide
instructions and queries to the rescuer. Consideration of aspiration or
airway obstruction is important and if suspected a Heimlich maneuver
may dislodge the obstructing body. A trained health care provider
would also check for a pulse (taking no longer than 10 s so as not to
delay initiation of chest compressions) and assess breathing. Gasping
respirations and brief seizure activity are common during SCA and
may be misinterpreted as breathing and responsiveness. Chest compressions should be initiated without delay and administered at a rate
of 100–120/min depressing the sternum by 5 cm (2 in.) and allowing
full chest recoil between compressions. Chest compressions generate
forward cardiac output with sequential filling and emptying of the cardiac chambers, with competent valves maintaining forward direction
of flow. Interruption of chest compressions should be minimized to
reduce end organ ischemia. Ventilation may be administered with two
breaths for every 30 compressions if a trained rescuer is present, but for
lay rescuers without training, chest compressions alone (“hands only
CPR”) are more likely to be effectively applied and of similar benefit.
If a second rescuer is present, they should be sent to seek out an AED,
which are now widely available in many public areas.
2262 PART 8 Critical Care Medicine
FIGURE 306-3 Algorithm for approach to cardiac arrest due to VT or VF (shockable rhythm). A. Chest compressions with ventilation and defibrillation or cardioversion
should be initiated as soon as possible. Defibrillation should be repeated with minimal interruption of chest compressions. Once an intravenous or intraosseous access is
established, administration of epinephrine defibrillation and amiodarone and defibrillation are performed. Further therapy can be guided by possible causes as suggested
by the initial or recurrent cardiac rhythm as shown. CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; I.O., intraosseous; I.V., intravenous; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention;
ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation. B. Algorithm for approach to cardiac arrest due to bradyarrhythmias/asystole and pulseless electrical activity. Chest compressions
with ventilation (and intubation) should be initiated as soon as possible, and IV access should be obtained. Once an intravenous or intraosseous access is established,
administration of epinephrine is performed. At the same time, an investigation for potential reversible causes should be made and any such causes should be treated if
present. For bradycardic rhythms, atropine 1 mg IV and external subcutaneous or transvenous pacing are also performed. Defibrillation should be repeated with minimal
interruption of chest compressions. Further therapy can be guided by possible causes. CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; I.O., intraosseous; I.V., intravenous; M.I.,
myocardial infarction.
Chest compressions at 100–120/min
Immediate defibrillation
and resume CPR for 2 min
Ventricular Fibrillation or Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia
A
2 min of chest compressions/ventilation and repeat shock
No ROSC
No ROSC
Continue chest compressions, I.V. or I.O. access, advanced airway
Epinephrine 1 mg q 3–5 min
Repeat shock
I.V. amiodarone 300 mg (may repeat 150 mg), continue CPR
Repeat shock
No ROSC
Specific therapies
Polymorphic VT/VF
Acute coronary syndrome:
lidocaine, PCI
Acquired long QT: Mg,
transvenous pacing,
isoproterenol.
Brugada syndrome, idiopathic VF:
isoporterenol, quinidine.
Monomorphic
VT
lidocaine
procainamide
Sinusoidal VT
Hyperkalemia:
Ca, NaHCO3.
Acute coronary
syndrome
Drug toxicity
Pulseless electrical
activity
Asystole
Bradyarrhythmia/Asystole Pulseless Electrical Activity
B
[Confirm asystole] [Assess pulse]
Identify and treat reversible causes
Epinephrine — 1 mg I.V. {repeat 3–5 min}
For Bradycardia:
Atropine 1 mg I.V.
Pacing — external or pacing wire
* Pulmonary embolus
* Drug overdose
* Hyperkalemia
* Severe acidosis
* Massive acute M.I.
* Hypovolemia
* Hypoxia
* Tamponade
* Pneumothorax
* Hypothermia
CPR, intubate, I.V. access
* Hypoxia
* Hyper- /hypokalemia
* Severe acidosis
* Drug overdose
* Hypothermia
2263Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Cardiac Death CHAPTER 306
When advanced cardiac life support is available, an intravenous or
intraosseous line is established for administration of medication and
consideration given to placement of an advanced airway (endotracheal
tube or supraglottic airway device). Epinephrine 1 mg every 3–5 min
may be administered intravenously or intraosseously. If circulation is
not restored or the patient is less than fully conscious despite return
of circulation, confirmation that acidosis and hypoxia are adequately
addressed should be assessed with arterial blood gas analysis. If metabolic acidosis persists after successful defibrillation and with adequate
ventilation, 1 meqE/kg NaHCO3
may be administered.
The cardiac rhythm guides resuscitation when monitoring is available. VT is treated with external shocks synchronized to the QRS when
VT is monomorphic, and asynchronous shocks for polymorphic VT or
VF. If VT/VF recurs after one or more shocks, amiodarone 300 mg can
be administered as a bolus via intravenous or intraosseous route in the
hope that arrhythmia recurrence will be prevented after the next shock,
followed by a 150-mg bolus if the arrhythmia recurs. If amiodarone
fails, lidocaine can be administered.
Consideration of etiology should also guide therapy (Chaps. 254
and 255). Commonly encountered causes of recurrent VT/VF may be
due to ongoing myocardial ischemia or infarction that would benefit
from emergent coronary angiography and revascularization, or QT
prolongation causing the polymorphic VT torsades des pointes that
may respond to administration of magnesium. Hyperkalemia should
respond to administration of calcium, while other measures are implemented to reduce serum potassium.
PEA/asystole should be managed with CPR, ventilation, and administration of epinephrine. Causes of PEA/asystole that require specific
therapy should be considered including airway obstruction, hypoxia,
hypovolemia, acidosis, hyperkalemia, hypothermia, toxins, cardiac
tamponade, tension pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism, and MI.
Naloxone should be administered if opiate overdose is suspected.
■ POSTCARDIAC ARREST ACUTE MANAGEMENT
Following restoration of effective circulation, the possibility of acute
MI should be immediately assessed. The majority of patients who have
ST elevation consistent with acute MI will be found to have a culprit
coronary stenosis/occlusion and emergent coronary angiography with
percutaneous angioplasty, and stenting is recommended. Angiography
should also be considered if an acute coronary syndrome is suspected,
even if ST segment elevation is absent, as approximately half of selected
patients undergoing angiography for this concern are found to have a
coronary lesion as a potential cause of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA).
However, immediate angiography has not been found to result in better
outcomes compared to delayed angiography in patients presenting with
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to a VT/VF with no ECG evidence
of ST-segment elevation. Thus, decisions regarding which patients
without ST segment elevation should undergo urgent angiography are
complex and factors such as hemodynamic or electrical instability and
evidence of ongoing ischemia are taken into consideration.
Hemodynamic instability is often present following resuscitation
and further ischemic end organ damage is a major consideration.
Optimizing ventilation with consideration of acidosis, hypoxemia,
and electrolyte abnormalities is important. Maintaining systolic BP at
>90 mmHg and mean BP >65 mmHg is desirable and may require
administration of vasopressors and adjustment of volume status.
Potentially treatable reversible causes including hyperkalemia, severe
hypokalemia, and drug toxicity with QT prolongation causing torsades
des pointes should be identified and treated (Chap. 255).
After stable spontaneous circulation is achieved, brain injury due
to ischemia and reperfusion is a major determinant of survival and
accounts for over two-thirds of deaths. The probability of successful
neurologic recovery decreases rapidly with time from collapse to ROSC
and is <30% at 5 min in the absence of bystander CPR. The time between
collapse and restoration of circulation is generally imprecise, and some
patients have a period of hypotensive VT prior to complete collapse, such
that a reported long period prior to arrival of rescuers does not always
preclude good neurologic recovery. Therapeutic hypothermia (targeted
temperature management) has been shown to improve the likelihood of
survival and neurologic recovery in patients who present with shockable
(VT or VF) rhythms and is recommended for all cardiac arrest patients
who remain comatose, regardless of presenting rhythm, who have lack
of purposeful response to verbal commands following return of spontaneous circulation. A constant target temperature of 32–36°C for at least
24 h is recommended, although a recent trial failed to demonstrate benefit compared with a strategy of targeted normothermia with early and
aggressive treatment of fever. Shivering suppression with analgesics and
sedatives may be needed. Induction of hypothermia should be started
in-hospital, as no benefit was shown for implementation before hospital arrival, and administration of large volumes of cold saline for this
purpose increased the risk of pulmonary edema. Brain injury is often
accompanied by seizures and status epilepticus that may have further
deleterious effects, warranting periodic or continuous electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring and treatment. A number of other therapies
hoped to improve post arrest outcomes have been assessed but have not
been shown to be beneficial, including administration of corticosteroids,
hemofiltration, and efforts to tightly control blood glucose.
Hypothermia and sedation preclude reliable prognostication for
neurologic recovery. Functional neurologic assessment for neurologic
recovery is generally deferred for at least 72 h after return to normothermia, typically 4–5 days after the cardiac arrest. Features that predict
poor outcome include absence of pupillary reflex to light, status myoclonus, absence of EEG reactivity to external stimuli, and persistent
burst suppression on EEG.
■ LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT AFTER SURVIVAL OF
OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST
For patients who survive cardiac arrest and have neurologic recovery,
the likely underlying cause of the arrest guides further treatment. For
arrests not due to an obvious noncardiac cause, a full evaluation for the
forms of structural heart disease outlined in Fig. 306-1 and Table 306-2
should be performed including an assessment for underlying CAD and
ischemia as well as echocardiography and/or cardiac MRI to look for
evidence of prior MI, valvular disease, nonischemic cardiomyopathies,
and to provide an assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
If the initial evaluation is not definitive or is suggestive of an inflammatory cardiomyopathy (i.e., sarcoidosis, myocarditis), a cardiac PET scan
and/or endomyocardial biopsy may also be performed. Patients without
obvious structural abnormalities should undergo an evaluation for primary electrical disease (long QT syndrome [LQTS], Brugada syndrome,
early repolarization syndrome, or Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome).
In cases where a heritable syndrome is suspected, further genetic evaluation should be considered. Diagnostic electrophysiology studies are
warranted in selected patients to assess inducible arrhythmias, or provocative testing, such as with epinephrine challenge for LQTS, or sodium
channel blocker (e.g., procainamide) challenge for Brugada syndrome.
Patients with shockable rhythms at arrest (VF and VT) that are not
deemed to have been due to a transient reversible cause and have reasonable life expectancy should undergo insertion of an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention of SCA/SCD. Most of
these patients will be found to have CAD. Patients with a VF arrest that
occurs within the first 48 h of a documented acute MI generally do not
require an ICD because they have a similar risk of sudden death over
the next 5 years as infarct survivors who did not have a cardiac arrest.
However, patients who have a large infarction with acutely depressed
LV ejection fraction (e.g., <35%) have an increased risk for future development of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias related to reentry in
the infarct scar (Chap. 252). The percentage of patients with such large
infarcts has been declining due to improved revascularization strategies for acute MI (Fig. 306-2D). Implantation of an ICD early after MI
in these patients does not, however, improve overall survival, in part
because a significant number of sudden deaths in the first 3 months
are due to recurrent myocardial ischemia or myocardial rupture, rather
than cardiac arrhythmias. For patients with large infarcts, a wearable
defibrillator that will treat VT/VF if it occurs may be used while left
ventricular remodeling is taking place, followed by reevaluation of
arrhythmia risk after the infarct is healed to determine if an ICD is
warranted. Patients who experience VF in-hospital >48 h after MI or
2264 PART 8 Critical Care Medicine
in the setting of myocardial ischemia without infarction may be at risk
for recurrent VT/VF. These patients should be evaluated and optimally
treated for ischemia. If there is evidence that clearly implicates ischemia
immediately preceding the onset of VF without evidence of a prior
MI, coronary revascularization may be adequate therapy. Others may
warrant ICD implantation. When the cardiac arrest is due to sustained
monomorphic VT, a prior infarct scar is often present and the recurrence rate is significant regardless of whether the arrest occurred in
association with elevated serum troponin. In this circumstance, even
when revascularization is performed for ischemia, an ICD is usually
warranted owing to the risk of recurrence of scar-related VT.
Patients who have cardiac arrest due to a treatable reversible cause,
such as hyperkalemia or drug toxicity with QT prolongation causing
torsades des pointes (Chap. 255), which can be adequately addressed
and prevented by other means, do not usually need an ICD. An ICD
is usually recommended for cardiac arrest due to VT or VF without a
clearly reversible cause, particularly when structural heart disease, such
as hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, cardiac sarcoidosis, or a cardiac syndrome associated with sudden death, including Brugada syndrome, or LQTS is present (Chaps.
254 and 255). In patients with structural heart disease, it is important
to recognize that life-threatening arrhythmias can be an indication of
terminal, end-stage heart disease with minimal prospect for meaningful survival despite successful resuscitation, and ICDs will not alter the
course of these patients and should not be implanted in this situation,
unless there is a prospect for cardiac replacement therapy with future
cardiac transplantation or a ventricular assist device.
PREVENTION OF SCD
Although advances in CPR and postresuscitation care have improved
survival rates after cardiac arrest, 90% of patients will not survive to be
discharged from the hospital. Of those that do survive, a proportion
(~20%) are left with severe neurologic and/or physical disability. The
majority of cardiac arrests do not occur in public places where AEDs
and rapid defibrillation have the greatest impact. Patients who suffer
an arrest at home also have longer EMS response times and are much
less likely to be found in VF. Finally, 50% of cardiac arrests are not
witnessed precluding effective resuscitation efforts. Thus, preventive
efforts are critical to reducing mortality from cardiac arrest.
■ SCD RISK STRATIFICATION
The presence of overt structural heart disease and/or primary electrical
heart disease is associated with an increased risk of SCD that varies with
the severity and type of disease. For patients with structural heart disease,
depressed left ventricular function is the best validated marker for risk, and
clinical HF elevates risk further. After MI, SCD risk increases gradually as
the LVEF decreases to 40% and then exponentially thereafter. In addition
to LVEF and CHF, other potential markers of increased SCD risk in the
setting of structural heart disease include unexplained syncope, sustained
VT induced at electrophysiology study (EP study), left ventricular scar
size and heterogeneity on cardiac magnetic resonance, markers of altered
autonomic function and altered repolarization, and QRS prolongation.
The majority of these tests, with the exception of the EP study in post-MI
patients, broadly predict death from cardiovascular causes and are not
able to discriminate patients who will die suddenly from an arrhythmia
and those who will die of other cardiac causes. For instance, patients with
the greatest degree of systolic HF and/or lowest LVEF, although at elevated
risk for SCD, are more likely to die from HF. Although sustained VT at EP
study does identify individuals at a higher risk of SCA versus non-SCA in
certain subsets of patients, the sensitivity of the test is generally inadequate
when LV function is significantly reduced.
■ PREVENTIVE THERAPIES FOR SCD IN HIGH-RISK
POPULATIONS
Therapy with beta-adrenergic blockers has been demonstrated to
reduce SCD risk in a multitude of settings including after MI, among
patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and in
LQTS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, aldosterone antagonists, and most recently angiotensin-receptor/neprilysin inhibitors
have been associated with reductions in SCD in subsets of patients
with structural heart disease, primarily ischemic and nonischemic
cardiomyopathy accompanied by HF. Coronary artery bypass grafting
has also been associated with reductions in SCD risk, and revascularization in general may lower SCD risk through reduction in ischemic
events and resultant improvements in left ventricular systolic function
by reducing areas of hibernating myocardium.
For patients whose disease continues to confer substantial risk of
sustained VT or VF on optimal medical therapy, an ICD is recommended (Table 306-3). The ICD indication in these patients is referred
to as “primary prevention of sudden death.” The indications for primary
prevention ICDs vary depending on the type of underlying structural
heart disease and its severity, and the strength of evidence varies by
indication. In patients with a history of MI more than 40 days ago, primary prevention ICDs are indicated for those with Class II–III NYHA
HF and LVEF <35%, and those who are NYHA functional Class I with
LVEF <30%. Although ICDs have not been found to be beneficial when
implanted within 40 days of an MI, those with recent or old MI, nonsustained VT, LVEF <40%, and inducible sustained VT at EP study also
warrant an ICD. In general, these criteria are not applied to patients
who are within 90 days of myocardial revascularization, since some will
experience improvement in ventricular function and older trial data
suggested there was no benefit with ICDs in these patents. High-risk
patients with low LVEFs may be considered for a wearable defibrillator
with later reassessment of ventricular function and ICD placement.
ICDs for primary prevention of sudden death are also recommended for patients with diseases other than CAD that put them at
risk for SCD. Primary prevention ICDs are currently indicated in select
high-risk patients with HCM, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, cardiac sarcoidosis, and Brugada syndrome, as well, and some
patients with congenital LQTS with high-risk features or who have
failed therapy with beta-adrenergic blocking agents. ICDs are currently
also recommended for those with nonischemic DCM who have an
LVEF ≤35% and who have NYHA functional Class II or III symptoms
on guideline-directed medical therapy.
Data from a recent randomized trial, the Danish Study to Assess the
Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure
on Mortality (DANISH), performed in patients with nonischemic
DCM and LVEF ≤35%, who also had elevated NT-proBNP levels and
NYHA Class II–IV HF, have resulted in some debate regarding these
latter guidelines. This trial did not demonstrate an overall mortality
benefit of the ICD despite a reduction in the incidence of SCD. In subgroup analyses, mortality benefits were observed in younger patients
in whom the competing risk of dying from other causes of death was
lower. These data underscore the importance of considering competing
risks for other causes of mortality when deciding to implant a primary
prevention ICD. Patients who are likely to die from other causes are
unlikely to benefit from an ICD. Patients who do not have a reasonable
expectation of survival with an acceptable functional status for at least
1 year, should not undergo ICD placement. There are also other circumstances where an ICD is not indicated even if there is a significant
sudden death risk (Table 306-4).
■ THE CHALLENGE OF SCD PREVENTION
(FIG. 306-4)
The Greatest Number of Sudden Deaths Occur in “LowRisk” Patients While patients with reduced left ventricular function and HF are at substantially elevated SCD risk, only ~20% of all
SCDs occur in patients with poor left ventricular function. Most SCDs
occur in individuals with preserved ventricular function who would
not qualify for a primary prevention ICD. Although SCD rates are
elevated compared to the general population, the absolute SCD risk in
patients with CHD or HF who have an LVEF >35% is not high enough
to warrant consideration of ICD therapy. While the incidence of SCD is
lower in patients with preserved LVEF, SCD accounts for a greater proportion of cardiac deaths, and active efforts are being made to advance
SCD risk stratification in this segment of the population. However,
at the present time, SCD prevention primarily involves cardiac risk
factor modification and standard medical therapy for the underlying
condition.
2265Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Cardiac Death CHAPTER 306
TABLE 306-3 Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Indications
INDICATION
CLASS OF
RECOMMENDATION*
LEVEL OF
EVIDENCE**
Secondary Prevention
All disease states
VT or VF
ICD therapy is indicated in patients who are survivors of cardiac arrest due to VF or
hemodynamically unstable sustained VT after evaluation to define the cause of the
event and to exclude any completely reversible causes.
ICD therapy is indicated in patients with structural heart disease and spontaneous
sustained VT, whether hemodynamically stable or unstable.
ICD implantation is reasonable for patients with sustained VT and normal or nearnormal ventricular function.
Class I
Class I
Class IIa
A
B
C
Syncope ICD therapy is indicated in patients with syncope of undetermined origin with
clinically relevant, hemodynamically significant sustained VT or VF induced at
electrophysiological study.
ICD therapy may be considered in patients with syncope and advanced structural
heart disease in whom invasive and noninvasive investigations have failed to
determine a cause.
Class I
Class IIb
B
C
Primary Prevention
Ischemic cardiomyopathy ICD therapy is indicated in patients with LVEF ≤35% due to prior MI who are at least
40 days post-MI and are in NYHA functional Class II or III.
ICD therapy is indicated in patients with LV dysfunction due to prior MI who are at
least 40 days post-MI, have an LVEF ≤30%, and are in NYHA functional Class I.
ICD therapy is indicated in patients with nonsustained VT due to prior MI, LVEF ≤40%,
and inducible VF or sustained VT at electrophysiological study.
Class I
Class I
Class I
B
A
B
Nonischemic
cardiomyopathy
ICD therapy is indicated in patients with nonischemic DCM who have an LVEF ≤35%
and who are in NYHA functional Class II or III.
ICD implantation is reasonable for patients with unexplained syncope, significant LV
dysfunction, and nonischemic DCM.
ICD therapy can be considered in patients with nonischemic heart disease and NYHA
functional Class I.
Class I
Class IIa
Class IIb
B
C
C
Hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy
ICD implantation is reasonable for patients with HCM who have one or more major
risk factors for SCD.
Class IIa C
Arrhythmogenic right
ventricular dysplasia
ICD implantation is reasonable for the prevention of SCD in patients with ARVC who
have one or more risk factors for SCD.
Class IIa C
Cardiac sarcoidosis ICD implantation is reasonable for the prevention of SCD in patients with cardiac
sarcoidosis who have one or more risk factors for SCD.
Class IIa C
Brugada syndrome ICD implantation is reasonable for patients with Brugada syndrome who have had
syncope.
ICD implantation is reasonable for patients with Brugada syndrome who have
documented VT that has not resulted in cardiac arrest.
Class IIa
Class IIa
C
C
Long-QT syndrome ICD implantation is reasonable to reduce SCD in patients with long QT syndrome who
are experiencing syncope and/or VT while receiving beta blockers.
ICD may be considered as primary therapy in patients with long QT syndrome who
are deemed to be at very high risk, especially those with a contraindication to beta
blocker therapy.
Class IIa
Class IIb
B
B
Catecholaminergic
polymorphic VT (CPVT)
ICD implantation is reasonable for patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic VT
who have syncope and/or documented sustained VT while receiving beta blockers.
Class IIa C
Familial cardiomyopathy ICD therapy may be considered in patients with a familial cardiomyopathy associated
with SCD.
Class IIa C
LV noncompaction ICD therapy may be considered. Class IIa C
CLASS OF RECOMMENDATION* LEVEL OF EVIDENCE**
Class I
Procedure/treatment
SHOULD be performed/
administered
Class IIa
Additional studies with focused
objectives needed.
IT IS REASONABLE to
perform procedure/administer
treatment.
Level A
Multiple populations evaluated.
Data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials
or meta-analyses.
Level B
Limited populations
evaluated.
Data derived from a
single randomized trial or
nonrandomized studies.
Level C
Very limited
populations
evaluated.
Only consensus
opinion of experts,
case studies, or
standard of care.
Abbreviations: VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia.
Preventing Sudden Death in the General Population Only
about one-half of men and one-third of women who suffer SCA are
recognized to have heart disease prior to the event, and only half
have warning symptoms prior to the event. SCD often occurs without
warning as the first manifestation of cardiac disease. In order to prevent these SCDs, preventive interventions would need to be employed
broadly to the general population. Although several risk scores have
recently been developed with the intent to stratify SCD risk in low-risk
populations, the clinical utility to date is limited by the low absolute
incidence of SCD, which is estimated to be only 50–90 per 100,000 in
the general adult population. Therefore, current efforts aimed at preventing SCD in general populations primarily focus on modification
of the SCD risk factors outlined previously. Individuals who adhere
to a low-risk, healthy lifestyle that includes avoidance of smoking,
2266 PART 8 Critical Care Medicine
TABLE 306-4 Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Not
Indicated
Patients who do not have a reasonable expectation of survival with an
acceptable functional status for at least 1 year, even if they meet ICD
implantation criteria.
Patients with incessant VT or VF.
Patients with significant psychiatric illnesses that may be aggravated by device
implantation or that may preclude systematic follow-up.
Patients with drug-refractory New York Heart Association Class IV congestive
heart failure who are not candidates for cardiac transplantation or cardiac
resynchronization therapy.
Syncope of undetermined cause in a patient without inducible ventricular
tachyarrhythmias and without structural heart disease.
VF or VT is amenable to surgical or catheter ablation in patients without other
disease predisposing to SCA (e.g., atrial arrhythmias associated with WolffParkinson-White syndrome, RV or LV outflow tract VT, idiopathic VT, or fascicular
VT in the absence of structural heart disease).
Patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias due to a completely reversible
disorder in the absence of structural heart disease (e.g., electrolyte imbalance,
drugs, or trauma).
Abbreviations: LV, left ventricular; RV, right ventricular; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT,
ventricular tachycardia.
Source: Adapted from AE Epstein et al: 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update
incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy
of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: A report of the American College of Cardiology
Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the
Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 127:e283, 2013.
LVEF <30–35%
15%
Sustained VT/VF 5%
No known heart
disease
50%
Other
80%
Patients
treated
with ICDs
A
B
7.2%
Absolute Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death by Clinical Subgroups
6.0%
3.0%
Threshold for
ICD
Demonstrate
benefit 1.5% 1.5%
1.0% 0.8%
0.08%
Sustained
VT/VF
Arrest
Ischemic CM,
LVEF<30%
(MADIT)
POST-MI,
LVEF>35%
Multiple
Cardiac
Risk Factors
General
Population
Proportion of Sudden Cardiac Death by Clinical Subgroups
Post-MI, CHD,
CM, or HF with
LVEF>35%
SCD Rate Per Year (%)
3% Year:
Heart Failure
with
Preserved
Ejection
Fraction
(HFPEF)
Non-Ischemic
CM, LVEF
≤35% NYHA
HF Class IIIV, NTproBNP>200
(DANISH Trial)
Ischemic +
Non-Ischemic
CM, LVEF
≤35%, NYHA
HF Class II-III
(SCD-HEFT)
FIGURE 306-4 A. Proportion of sudden cardiac deaths that occur in clinical subgroups of the population treated and not treated with ICDs. B. Absolute risk of sudden cardiac
death within clinical subgroups in comparison to the threshold of risk where ICDs demonstrated benefit.
maintaining a healthy body weight, participating in moderate exercise,
and a Mediterranean-type dietary pattern have markedly lower rates
of SCD. A substantial number of SCDs are likely to be preventable
through lifestyle modifications and treatment of risk factors.
Acknowledgment
William G. Stevenson contributed to this chapter in the 20th edition and
some material from that chapter has been retained here.
■ FURTHER READING
Al-Khatib SM et al: 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management
of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/
American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. 72:e91, 2018.
Callaway CW et al: Part 8: Post-Cardiac Arrest Care: 2015 American
Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 132:S465, 2015.
Dankiewicz J et al: Hypothermia versus normothermia after out-ofhospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 384:2283, 2021.
Deo R, Albert CM: Epidemiology and genetics of sudden cardiac
death. Circulation 125:620, 2012.
Fishman GI et al: Sudden cardiac death prediction and prevention
report from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Heart
Rhythm Society workshop. Circulation 122:2335, 2010.
Hayashi M et al: The spectrum of epidemiology underlying sudden
cardiac death. Circ Res 116:1887, 2015.
2267 Nervous System Disorders in Critical Care CHAPTER 307
Link MS et al: Part 7: Adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2015
American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation
132:S444, 2015.
Myerburg RJ et al: Pulseless electric activity: Definition, causes,
mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next
decade: Report from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Workshop. Circulation 128:2532, 2013.
Neumar RW et al: Part 1: Executive summary. 2015 American Heart
Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and
emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 132:S315, 2015.
Stecker EC et al: Public health burden of sudden cardiac death in the
United States. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 7:212, 2014.
Zipes DP et al: ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for management of
patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden
cardiac death: A report of the American College of Cardiology/
American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of
Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (writing committee
to develop guidelines for management of patients with ventricular
arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death): Developed
in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and
the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 114:e385, 2006.
Life-threatening neurologic illness may be caused by a primary disorder affecting any region of the neuraxis or may occur as a consequence
of a systemic disorder such as hepatic failure, multisystem organ failure, or cardiac arrest (Table 307-1). Neurologic critical care focuses
on preservation of neurologic tissue and prevention of secondary
brain injury caused by ischemia, hemorrhage, edema, herniation,
and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Encephalopathy is a general
term describing brain dysfunction that is diffuse, global, or multifocal.
Severe acute encephalopathies represent a group of various disorders
due to different neurologic or systemic etiologies but that share the
common themes of primary and secondary brain injury.
■ PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Brain Edema Swelling, or edema, of brain tissue occurs with many
types of brain injury. The two principal types of edema are vasogenic
and cytotoxic. Vasogenic edema refers to the influx of fluid and solutes
into the brain through an incompetent blood-brain barrier (BBB). In
the normal cerebral vasculature, endothelial tight junctions associated
with astrocytes create an impermeable barrier (the BBB), through
which access into the brain interstitium is dependent upon specific
transport mechanisms. The BBB may be compromised in ischemia,
trauma, infection, and metabolic derangements, and typically develops rapidly following injury. Cytotoxic edema results from cellular
swelling, membrane breakdown, and ultimately cell death. Clinically
significant brain edema usually represents a combination of vasogenic
and cytotoxic components. Edema can lead to increased ICP as well
as tissue shifts and brain displacement or herniation from focal processes (Chap. 28). These tissue shifts can cause injury by mechanical
Section 3 Neurologic Critical Care
307 Nervous System
Disorders in Critical
Care
J. Claude Hemphill, III, Wade S. Smith,
S. Andrew Josephson, Daryl R. Gress
TABLE 307-1 Neurologic Disorders in Critical Illness
LOCALIZATION ALONG
NEUROAXIS SYNDROME
Central Nervous System
Brain: Cerebral
hemispheres
Global encephalopathy
Delirium
Sepsis
Organ failure—hepatic, renal
Medication related—sedatives, hypnotics,
analgesics, H2
blockers, antihypertensives
Drug overdose
Electrolyte disturbance—hyponatremia,
hypoglycemia
Hypotension/hypoperfusion
Hypoxia
Meningitis
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Wernicke’s disease
Seizure—postictal or nonconvulsive status
epilepticus
Hypertensive encephalopathy
Hypothyroidism—myxedema
Focal deficits
Ischemic stroke
Tumor
Abscess, subdural empyema
Intraparenchymal hemorrhage
Subdural/epidural hematoma
Brainstem/cerebellum Mass effect and compression
Basilar artery thrombosis
Intraparenchymal hemorrhage
Central pontine myelinolysis
Spinal cord Mass effect and compression
Disk herniation
Epidural hematoma
Epidural abscess
Ischemia—hypotension/embolic
Trauma
Myelitis
Peripheral Nervous System
Peripheral nerve
Axonal Critical illness polyneuropathy
Neuromuscular blocking agent complications
Metabolic disturbances, uremia, hyperglycemia
Medication effects—chemotherapeutic,
antiretroviral
Demyelinating Guillain-Barré syndrome
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating
polyneuropathy
Neuromuscular junction Prolonged effect of neuromuscular blockade
Medication effects—aminoglycosides
Myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome,
botulism
Muscle Critical illness myopathy
Cachectic myopathy
Acute necrotizing myopathy
Thick-filament myopathy
Electrolyte disturbances—hypokalemia/
hyperkalemia, hypophosphatemia
Rhabdomyolysis
2268 PART 8 Critical Care Medicine
distention and compression in addition to the ischemia of impaired
perfusion consequent to the elevated ICP.
Ischemic Cascade and Cellular Injury When delivery of substrates, principally oxygen and glucose, is inadequate to sustain cellular function, a series of interrelated biochemical reactions known
as the ischemic cascade is initiated (see Fig. 426-2). The release of
excitatory amino acids, especially glutamate, leads to influx of calcium
and sodium ions, which disrupt cellular homeostasis. An increased
intracellular calcium concentration may activate proteases and lipases,
which then lead to lipid peroxidation and free radical–mediated cell
membrane injury. Cytotoxic edema ensues, and ultimately necrotic
cell death and tissue infarction occur. This pathway to irreversible cell
death is common to ischemic stroke, global cerebral ischemia, and
traumatic brain injury.
Penumbra refers to areas of ischemic brain tissue that have not
yet undergone irreversible infarction, implying that these regions are
potentially salvageable if ischemia can be reversed. Factors that may
exacerbate ischemic brain injury include systemic hypotension and
hypoxia, which further reduce substrate delivery to vulnerable brain
tissue, and fever, seizures, and hyperglycemia, which can increase
cellular metabolism, outstripping compensatory processes. Clinically,
these events are known as secondary brain insults because they lead to
exacerbation of the primary brain injury. Prevention, identification,
and treatment of secondary brain insults are fundamental goals of
management.
An alternative pathway of cellular injury is apoptosis. This process
implies programmed cell death, which may occur in the setting of
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), mmHg
Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF), mL/100 g/min
50 150
55
), g
B
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), mmHg
Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF), mL/100 g/min
0 50 150
55
F), mL/100 g/
min ), g
A
FIGURE 307-1 Pressure autoregulation of cerebral blood flow. In the normal state where autoregulation is intact A, cerebral perfusion is constant over a wide range
of systemic blood pressures (BP). This is mediated by dilation and constriction of small cerebral arterioles (round circles). Below the BP threshold for maximal dilation,
cerebral blood flow becomes pressure-dependent and decreases, whereas above the threshold for maximum constriction, cerebral blood flow increases with increasing
systemic BP. In severe brain injury, autoregulatory mechanisms may be impaired and cerebral blood flow becomes pressure-dependent throughout (B). At the extremes of
BP, there may be vascular collapse (very low BP) or forced vasodilation (very high BP).
ischemic stroke, global cerebral ischemia, traumatic brain injury, and
possibly intracerebral hemorrhage. Apoptotic cell death can be distinguished histologically from the necrotic cell death of ischemia and is
mediated through a different set of biochemical pathways; apoptotic
cell death occurs without cerebral edema and therefore is often not
seen on brain imaging. At present, interventions for prevention and
treatment of apoptotic cell death remain less well defined than those
for ischemia.
Cerebral Perfusion and Autoregulation Brain tissue requires
constant perfusion in order to ensure adequate delivery of substrate.
The hemodynamic response of the brain has the capacity to preserve
perfusion across a wide range of systemic blood pressures. Cerebral
perfusion pressure (CPP), defined as the mean systemic arterial pressure (MAP) minus the ICP, provides the driving force for circulation
across the capillary beds of the brain. Autoregulation refers to the physiologic response whereby cerebral blood flow (CBF) is regulated via
alterations in cerebrovascular resistance in order to maintain perfusion
over wide physiologic changes such as neuronal activation or changes
in hemodynamic function. If systemic blood pressure drops, cerebral
perfusion is preserved through vasodilation of arterioles in the brain;
likewise, arteriolar vasoconstriction occurs at high systemic pressures
to prevent hyperperfusion, resulting in fairly constant perfusion across
a wide range of systemic blood pressures (Fig. 307-1). At the extreme
limits of MAP or CPP (high or low), flow becomes directly related to
perfusion pressure. These autoregulatory changes occur in the microcirculation and are mediated by vessels below the resolution of those
seen on angiography. CBF is also strongly influenced by pH and Paco2
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع