to avoid confusing diverticulitis-associated colitis with inflammatory bowel disease. Probiotics and
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications are being explored as potentially protective agents.26,39,40
Diagnosis
Noninflammatory Diverticular Disease
Most patients with diverticulosis noted on barium study, colonoscopy, or abdominal CT scan are
asymptomatic. In patients who have vague, crampy, left lower quadrant pain in the absence of fever,
leukocytosis, or CT findings of focal inflammation, other causes of pain must also be considered.
Additional symptoms reported may include nausea, flatulence, bloating, and change of bowel habit. The
differential diagnosis includes colonic adenocarcinoma, constipation, inflammatory bowel disease, and
IBS. There are no peritoneal signs on examination, the rectal examination is unrevealing, and
proctoscopy shows no inflammation. Postinflammatory neurogenic alteration has been postulated as a
cause of visceral hypersensitivity.41–43 Nonspecific, mild mucosal inflammation and muscle spasm may
also contribute. There is considerable overlap with IBS. In addition to high-fiber modification of the diet
and bulk-forming agents such as psyllium or flaxseed, anticholinergics, analgesics, and antibiotics can be
prescribed to manage symptoms.
Hemorrhagic Diverticular Disease. Like bleeding from colonic angiodysplasia, diverticular
hemorrhage is classically asymptomatic until presentation with lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage that
can be massive. This differs from hemorrhage from inflammatory bowel disease or ischemic colitis
where there are typically symptoms before bleeding begins. A foregut source of bleeding must be
excluded by nasoenteric recovery of bilious, nonbloody aspirate or upper endoscopy. Likewise, an
anorectal source of bleeding must be excluded by examination. Localization of lower gastrointestinal
hemorrhage of any cause is necessary to help guide appropriate colon resection should that be required.
Although most cases of diverticular hemorrhage are self-limited, recurrence or failure of bleeding to
stop spontaneously determines the need for resection. Colonoscopy, tagged red blood cell scan, or, if
bleeding is brisk enough, angiography is used to localize bleeding (Fig. 69-4).
Giant Colonic Diverticula. Symptoms and signs of giant colonic diverticula may be noninflammatory
(pain, bloating, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal tenderness and mass) or inflammatory, resulting
from perforation (pain, leukocytosis, fever, localized or generalized peritonitis).13
Inflammatory Diverticular Disease
The constellation of inflammatory signs and symptoms corresponds to the spectrum of inflammatory
complications of DD. The Hinchey classification44 categorized the severity of acute diverticulitis and has
been modified to reflect refinements of diagnosis enabled by improved CT scan quality (Table 69-2).45
The modified classification also includes manifestations of chronic inflammation such as fistula
formation and stricture/obstruction.
Symptoms of acute diverticulitis include steady, left lower-quadrant abdominal pain; fever; change in
bowel habits (constipation or diarrhea); anorexia; nausea; vomiting; bloating; and urinary tract
symptoms such as urinary frequency or retention. Examination will reveal left lower-quadrant
tenderness that may be appreciable only with deep palpation in stage 0 inflammation. In stage I or II
inflammation, focal peritoneal signs in the left lower quadrant are likely, and there may be a tender
mass. Digital rectal examination may also reveal pelvic tenderness or a tender mass in the cul-de-sac.
Generalized peritoneal signs would be expected for stage III or IV inflammation. Dehydration with
earlier stages or evolving sepsis with later stages may cause tachycardia and hypotension. Leukocytosis
is more likely with advancing stage of inflammation. The differential diagnosis includes perforated
colon cancer, acute appendicitis, perforated peptic ulcer, acute ischemic colitis, pancreatitis, and flare of
Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis. Normal serum amylase and lipase help exclude a diagnosis of
pancreatitis. Imaging studies and endoscopy help to distinguish diverticulitis from the other diagnoses.
However, active inflammation or contained perforation may limit the utility of rectal contrast CT,
barium enema studies, and endoscopy in the acute setting. Distinguishing perforated colon cancer from
DD can be especially challenging, even in the operating room.
Diverticular fistula formation represents internal drainage of an abscess (or external drainage in the
case of colocutaneous fistulas). Approximately half of diverticular fistulas are colovesical fistulas.
Women with colovesical or colovaginal fistulas have usually had a hysterectomy.46,47 Urinary tract
infection symptoms, pneumaturia, and fecaluria are common complaints. Recurrent urinary tract
1834
infection in elderly men should raise concern for the presence of a colovesical fistula, which is often
secondary to DD. Passage of feces or flatus from the vagina is a characteristic symptom of a colovaginal
fistula. Colocutaneous fistulas are a rare complication of DD.
Figure 69-4. Superior mesenteric arteriogram from a patient with bleeding from a right colon diverticulum. A: Early radiograph
with contrast material outlining the diverticulum (arrow). B: Late radiograph demonstrating overflow of contrast material into the
colonic lumen(arrow).
Thirteen percent of large-bowel obstructions are due to DD. The concurrent incidence of colon
carcinoma in 7% of patients with symptomatic sigmoid DD confounds diagnosis and treatment.48 CT
scan is not as reliable for distinguishing these diagnoses as colonoscopy or contrast enema studies.
Right-sided diverticulitis frequently is confused with appendicitis, and misdiagnosis is common. The
duration of symptoms is usually longer than appendicitis. Patients are usually older than those with
appendicitis (late 30s or 40s) but younger than patients with typical left-sided diverticulosis (over 50
years of age).49,50
CLASSIFICATION
Table 69-2 Modified Hinchey Classification
1835
Figure 69-5. Sigmoid diverticulitis with pericolic abscess(arrows).
Imaging and Diagnostic Studies for Diverticular Disease
Plain Radiographs. While seldom useful in the diagnosis of uncomplicated diverticulitis, a three-way
abdominal series that includes an upright chest radiograph, an abdominal flat plate, and a left lateral
decubitus view is useful for demonstrating free air. An ileus pattern or soft tissue mass may also be
detected.51,52
5 Computed Tomography Scan. CT scanning has revolutionized the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis
and, sometimes, by way of percutaneous abscess drainage, its treatment. The accuracy of CT scans in
the acute setting is central to the trend toward converting what formerly were surgical emergencies into
elective, often single-stage operations. Intravenous and water-soluble oral and rectal enteric contrast
should be administered. Water-soluble contrast is used to avoid barium peritonitis that may result if
barium leaks from a perforated diverticulum into the peritoneal cavity.
A CT scan can reveal the presence and extent of diverticulosis, but its real strength is characterizing
extracolonic inflammatory change. Signs of inflammation include colon wall thickening, pericolic fat
stranding, or phlegmon formation. Pericolic abscess size and location can be detected (Fig. 69-5).
Perforation is evidenced by free air; contained perforation may be identified by loculated extraluminal
pericolic air. CT more accurately demonstrates diverticular abscesses and severity of inflammation than
contrast enema studies.53 Air in the bladder or contrast in the vagina may indicate the presence of a
fistula (Fig. 69-6).
Figure 69-6. A: Computed tomography scan demonstrating air in the urinary bladder (arrow) in the presence of a colovesical
fistula secondary to diverticulitis. B: Air in the urinary bladder (small arrow) in association with a paravesical inflammatory mass
(large arrow). (Reproduced with permission from Sarr MG, Fishman EK, Goldman SM. Enterovesical fistula. Surg Gynecol
Obstet1987;164(1):41–48.)
Rao et al.54 reported a misdiagnosis rate of up to 67% for diverticulitis in patients with abdominal
pain managed without CT imaging. An alternate diagnosis is suggested by CT scan in 45% to 58% of
cases when diverticulitis is not found, including small-bowel obstruction, acute cholecystitis,
appendicitis, gynecologic disease, and primary epiploic appengitis.55 Correct preoperative diagnosis of
right-sided diverticulitis has also been enhanced by CT scanning.
Not only is CT useful for improving diagnostic accuracy, but also findings can predict failure of
medical management or risk of secondary complications following medical management.
1836
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع