Dorman SE et al. Substitution of moxifloxacin for isoniazid during intensive phase treatment of pulmonary
tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:273.
Bozeman L et al. Fluoroquinolone susceptibility among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from the United
States and Canada. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:386.
Devasia RA et al. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The effect of duration and timing of
fluoroquinolone exposure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:365.
Johnson R et al. Drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2006;8:97.
Williamson DA et al. Clinical failures associated with rpoB mutations in phenotypically occult multidrug-resistant
Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16:216.
Morgan M et al. A commercial line probe assay for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium
tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;5:62.
Ling DI et al. GenoType MTBDR assays for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a meta-analysis.
Eur Respir J. 2008;32:1165.
Lin S-YG et al. Rapid detection of isoniazid and rifampin resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
complex from cultures or smear-positive sputa by use of molecular beacons. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:4204.
Boehme CC et al. Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med.
2010;363:1005.
Theron G et al. Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a high HIV
prevalence setting. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184;132.
American Thoracic Society et al. Controlling tuberculosis in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.
2005;172:1169.
Cohn DL et al. A 62-dose, 6-month therapy for pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a twice-weekly,
directly observed, and cost-effective regimen. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:407.
Tam CM et al. Rifapentine and isoniazid in the continuation phase of treating pulmonary tuberculosis. Initial
report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(6, Pt 1):1726.
Benator D et al. Rifapentine and isoniazid once a week versus rifampicin and isoniazid twice a week for
treatment of drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-negative patients: a randomised clinical trial.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
Lancet. 2002;360:528.
Bock NN et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the tolerability of rifapentine 600, 900, and 1,200
mg plus isoniazid in the continuation phase of tuberculosis treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.
2002;165:1526.
Weiner M et al. Low isoniazid concentrations and outcome of tuberculosis treatment with once-weekly isoniazid
and rifapentine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1341.
Gillespie SH et al. Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. N Engl J Med.
2014;371:1577.
Merle CS et al. A four-month gatifloxacin-containing regimen for treating tuberculosis. N Engl J Med.
2014;371:1588.
Jindani A et al. High-dose rifapentine with moxifloxacin for pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med.
2014;371:1599.
Chaulk CP, Kazandjian VA. Directly observed therapy for treatment completion of pulmonary tuberculosis:
consensus statement of the Public Health Tuberculosis Guidelines Panel [published correction appears in
JAMA. 1998;280:134]. JAMA. 1998;279:943.
Jasmer RM et al. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes: directly observed therapy compared with self-administered
therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:561.
Burman WJ et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of directly observed therapy vs. self-administered therapy for
treatment of tuberculosis. Chest. 1997;112:63.
Mahmoudi A, Iseman MD. Pitfalls in the care of patients with tuberculosis. Common errors and their association
with the acquisition of drug resistance. JAMA. 1993;270:65.
Iseman MD et al. Directly observed treatment of tuberculosis: we can’t afford not to try it. N Engl J Med.
1993;328:576.
Jindani A et al. The early bactericidal activity of drugs in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir
Dis. 1980;121:939.
Chan SL et al. The early bactericidal activity of rifabutin measured by sputum viable counts in Hong Kong
patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuber Lung Dis. 1992;73:33.
Sirgel FA et al. The early bactericidal activity of rifabutin in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis measured by
sputum viable counts: a new method of drug assessment. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;32:867.
Botha FJH et al. The early bactericidal activity of ethambutol, pyrazinamide, and the fixed combination of
isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide (Rifater) in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. S Afr Med J.
1996;86:155.
Dickinson JM, Mitchison DA. Experimental models to explain the high sterilizing activity of rifampin in the
chemotherapy of tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981; 123(4, Pt 1):367.
Peloquin CA, Berning SE. Comment: intravenous streptomycin [letter]. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:1546.
Combs DL et al. USPHS Tuberculosis Short-Course Chemotherapy Trial 21: effectiveness, toxicity, and
acceptability: the report of final results. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:397.
Khan A et al. Lack of weight gain and relapse risk in a large tuberculosis treatment trial. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med. 2006;174:344.
Arend SM et al. Comparison of two interferon-gamma assays and tuberculin skin test for tracing tuberculosis
contacts. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:618.
Diel R et al. Comparative performance of tuberculin skin test, QuantiFERON- TB-Gold In Tube Assay, and TSpot. TB test in contact investigations for tuberculosis. Chest. 2009;135:1010.
Schluger NW, BurzynskiJ. Recent advances in testing for latent TB. Chest. 2010;138:1456.
Horsburgh CR, Rubin EJ. Latent tuberculosis infection in the United States. N EnglJ Med. 2011;364:1441.
LoBue PA, Moser KS. Use of isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection in a public health clinic. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med. 2003;168:443.
Horsburgh CR Jr et al. Latent TB infection treatment acceptance and completion in the United States and
Canada. Chest. 2010;137:401.
Menzies D et al. Treatment completion and costs of a randomized trial of rifampin for 4 months versus isoniazid
for 9 months. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:445.
Menzies D et al. Adverse events with 4 months of rifampin therapy or 9 months of isoniazid therapy for latent
tuberculosis infection: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:689.
Reichman LB et al. Considering the role of four months of rifampin in the treatment of latent tuberculosis
infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:832.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
129.
130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
135.
136.
137.
138.
139.
140.
141.
142.
143.
144.
145.
Fountain FF et al. Rifampin hepatotoxicity associated with treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Med
Sci. 2009;337:317.
Holland DP et al. Costs and cost-effectiveness of four treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179:1055.
Sterling TR et al. Three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med.
2011;365:2155.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for use of an isoniazid-rifapentine regimen with
direct observation to treat latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:1650.
Saukkonen JJ et al. An official ATS statement: hepatotoxicity of antituberculosis therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med. 2006;174:935.
Moulding T. Isoniazid-associated hepatitis deaths: a review of available information [letter]. Am Rev Respir Dis.
1992;146:1643.
Ellard GA. Variations between individuals and populations in the acetylation of isoniazid and its significance for
the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976;19(5, Pt 2):610.
Ellard GA et al. The hepatic toxicity of isoniazid among rapid and slow acetylators of the drug. Am Rev Respir
Dis. 1978;118:628.
Kopanoff DE et al. Isoniazid-related hepatitis: a U.S. Public Health Service cooperative surveillance study. Am
Rev Respir Dis. 1978;117:991.
Girling DJ. Adverse effects of antituberculosis drugs. Drugs. 1982;23:56.
Steele MA et al. Toxic hepatitis with isoniazid and rifampin: a meta-analysis. Chest. 1991;99:465.
Nolan CM et al. Hepatotoxicity associated with isoniazid preventive therapy: a 7-year survey from a public
health tuberculosis clinic. JAMA. 1999;281:1014.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Severe isoniazid-associated liver injuries among persons being
treated for latent tuberculosis infection—United States, 2004–2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:224.
Wright JM et al. Isoniazid-induced carbamazepine toxicity and vice versa: a double drug interaction. N Engl J
Med. 1982;307:1325.
Baciewicz AM et al. Update on rifampin and rifabutin drug interactions. Am J Med Sci. 2008;335:126.
Sanders WE Jr. Rifampin. Ann Intern Med. 1976;85:82.
Zierski M, Bek E. Side-effects of drug regimens used in short-course chemotherapy for pulmonary tuberculosis:
a controlled clinicalstudy. Tubercle. 1980;61:41.
Girling DJ. Adverse reactions to rifampicin in antituberculosis regimens. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1977;3:115.
Lee CH, Lee CJ. Thrombocytopenia—a rare but potentially serious side effect of initial daily and interrupted use
of rifampicin. Chest. 1989;96:202.
Berning SE, Iseman MD. Rifamycin-induced lupus syndrome. Lancet. 1997;349:1521.
Bennett WM et al. Drug therapy in renal failure: dosing guidelines for adults. Part I: antimicrobial agents,
analgesics. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:62.
Andrew OT et al. Tuberculosis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Am J Med. 1980;68:59.
Semvua HH et al. Pharmacological interactions between rifampicin and antiretroviral drugs: challenges and
research priorities for resource-limited settings. Ther Drug Monit. 2015;37:22.
Niemi M et al. Pharmacokinetic interactions with rifampicin: clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacokinet.
2003;42:819.
Citron KM, Thomas GO. Ocular toxicity from ethambutol. Thorax. 1986;41:737.
Schild HS, Fox BC. Rapid-onset reversible ocular toxicity from ethambutol therapy. Am J Med. 1991;90:404.
Alvarez KL, Krop LC. Ethambutol-induced ocular toxicity revisited [letter]. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:102.
Van den Brande P. Revised guidelines for the diagnosis and control of tuberculosis: impact on management in
the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2005;22:663.
Rajagopalan S, Yoshikawa TT. Tuberculosis in long-term-care facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.
2000;21:611.
Stead WW et al. Tuberculosis as an endemic and nosocomial infection among elderly in nursing homes. N EnglJ
Med. 1985;312:1483.
Chan CH et al. The effect of age on the presentation of patients with tuberculosis. Tuber Lung Dis.
1995;76:290.
Rajagopalan S. Tuberculosis and aging: a global health problem. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:1034.
van den Brande P et al. Aging and hepatotoxicity of isoniazid and rifampin in pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152(5, Pt 1):1705.
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
151.
152.
153.
154.
155.
156.
157.
158.
159.
160.
161.
162.
163.
164.
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
170.
171.
Goble M et al. Treatment of 171 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid and rifampin. N Engl
J Med. 1993;328:527.
Berning SE et al. Malabsorption of antituberculosis medications by a patient with AIDS. N Engl J Med.
1992;327:1817.
Driver CR et al. Factors associated with tuberculosis treatment interruption in New York City. J Public Health
Manag Pract. 2005;11:361.
Di Perri G, Bonora S. Which agents should we use for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium
tuberculosis? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54:593.
Burgos M et al. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in San Francisco: an outpatient-based approach.
Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:968.
Holtz TH et al. Time to sputum culture conversion in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: predictors and relationship
to treatment outcome. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:650.
Winston CA et al. Treatment duration for patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis, United States. Emerg Infect
Dis. 2012;18:1201.
Van Deun A et al. Short, highly effective, and inexpensive standardized treatment of multidrug-resistant
tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:684.
Berning SE et al. Long-term safety of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in the treatment of mycobacterial infections.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151:2006.
Peloquin CA et al. Levofloxacin for drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Ann Pharmacother.
1998;32:268.
Codecasa LR et al. Long-term moxifloxacin in complicated tuberculosis patients with adverse reactions or
resistance to first line drugs. Respir Med. 2006;100:1566.
Worley MV, Estrada SJ. Bedaquiline: a novel antitubercular agent for the treatment of multidrug-resistant
tuberculosis. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34:1187.
Diacon AH et al. The diarylquinoline TMC207 for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med.
2009;360:2397.
Diacon AH et al. Randomized pilot trial of eight weeks of bedaquiline (TMC207) treatment for multidrugresistant tuberculosis: long-term outcome, tolerability, and effect on emergence of drug resistance. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother. 2012;56:3271.
Diacon AH et al. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and culture conversion with bedaquiline. N Engl J Med.
2014;371:723.
Panel on Opportunistic Infections in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the prevention and
treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents.
https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/lvguidelines/adult_oi.pdf. Accessed October 10, 2015.
Luetkemeyer AF et al. Comparison of an interferon-gamma release assay with tuberculin skin testing in HIVinfected individuals. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:737.
Dewan PK et al. Low sensitivity of a whole-blood interferon-γ release assay for detection of active tuberculosis.
Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:69.
Menzies D et al. New tests for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: areas of uncertainty and
recommendations for research [published correction appears in Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:688]. Ann Intern
Med. 2007;146:340.
Monkongdee P et al. Yield of acid-fast smear and mycobacterial culture for tuberculosis diagnosis in people with
human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:903.
Rich ML et al. Representative drug susceptibility patterns for guiding design of retreatment regimens for MDRTB. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10:290.
Burman WJ, Jones BE. Treatment of HIV-related tuberculosis in the era of effective antiretroviral therapy. Am
J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Acquired rifamycin resistance in persons with advanced HIV
disease being treated for active tuberculosis with intermittent rifamycin-based regimens. Morb Mortal Wkly
Rep. 2002;51:214.
Swaminathan S et al. Efficacy of a 6-month versus 9-month intermittent treatment regimen in HIV-infected
patients with tuberculosis: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:743.
Peloquin CA. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of tuberculosis. Drugs. 2002;62:2169.
Blanc FX et al. Earlier versus later start of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults with tuberculosis. N
EnglJ Med. 2011;365:1471.
172.
173.
174.
175.
176.
177.
178.
179.
180.
181.
182.
183.
184.
185.
186.
187.
188.
189.
190.
191.
192.
193.
194.
195.
196.
197.
198.
Havlir DV et al. Timing of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection and tuberculosis. N Engl J Med.
2011;365:1482.
Abdool Karim SS et al. Integration of antiretroviral therapy with tuberculosis treatment. N Engl J Med.
2011;365:1492.
Hammer SM et al. Treatment for adult HIV infection: 2006 recommendations of the International AIDS Society
—USA panel. JAMA. 2006;296:827.
Lopez-Cortes LF et al. Pharmacokinetic interactions between efavirenz and rifampicin in HIV-infected patients
with tuberculosis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41:681.
Cohen K et al. Effect of rifampicin-based antitubercular therapy and the cytochrome P450 2B6 516G>T
polymorphism on efavirenz concentrations in adults in South Africa. Antivir Ther. 2009;14:687.
Ramachandran G et al. CYP2B6 G516T polymorphism but not rifampin coadministration influences steady-state
pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in South Africa. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother. 2009;53:863.
Pape JW et al. Effect of isoniazid prophylaxis on incidence of active tuberculosis and progression of HIV
infection. Lancet. 1993;342:268.
Mnyani CN, McIntyre JA. Tuberculosis in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:226.
Brost BC, Newman RB. The maternal and fetal effects of tuberculosis therapy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am.
1997;24:659.
Frieden TR et al. Tuberculosis. Lancet. 2003;362:887.
Vallejo JG, Starke JR. Tuberculosis and pregnancy. Clin Chest Med. 1992;13:693.
Bergeron KG et al. Tuberculosis in pregnancy: current recommendations for screening and treatment in the
USA. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2004;2:589.
Shin S et al. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis during pregnancy: a report of 7 cases. Clin Infect Dis.
2003;36:996.
Drobac PC et al. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis during pregnancy: long-term follow-up of 6
children with intrauterine exposure to second-line agents. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1689.
Powell DA, Hunt WG. Tuberculosis in children: an update. Adv Pediatr. 2006;53:279.
Starke JR Correa AG. Management of mycobacterial infection and disease in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J.
1995;14:455.
Pediatric Tuberculosis Collaborative Group. Targeted tuberculin skin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis
infection in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004;114(Suppl 4):1175.
Golden MP, Vikram HR. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72:1761.
Garg RK. Tuberculosis of the central nervous system. Postgrad Med J. 1999;75:133.
Holdiness MR. Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of the antituberculosis drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet.
1985;10:532.
Dooley DP et al. Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy for tuberculosis: a critical reappraisal of the literature. Clin
Infect Dis. 1997;25:872.
Heysell HK et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring for slow response to tuberculosis treatment in a state control
program, Virginia, USA. Emerg Inf Dis. 2010;16:1546.
Magis-Escurra C et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of tuberculosis patients. Pulm Pharmacol
Ther. 2012;25:83.
Babalik A et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of active tuberculosis. Can Respir J. 2011;18:225.
Prahl JB et al. Clinical significance of 2 h plasma concentrations of first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs: a
prospective observationalstudy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:2841.
Pasipanodya JG et al. Serum drug concentrations predictive of pulmonary tuberculosis outcomes. J Infect Dis.
2013;208:1464.
Alsultan A, Peloquin CA. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of tuberculosis: an update. Drugs.
2014;74:839.
p. 1445
The most common complication of any diarrheal illness is loss of fluids
and electrolytes, which in extreme cases can lead to hypovolemia,
shock, and death. Depending on the degree of dehydration, fluid and
electrolyte losses are replaced intravenously or orally.
Case 69-1 (Questions 1, 2)
Classification of infectious diarrheas as either an inflammatory or
noninflammatory diarrheal illness provides a basis for preparing a
focused list of suspected pathogens, thus guiding the overall diagnostic
and therapeutic plan.
Case 69-1 (Questions 3–4)
Vibrio cholerae 01 and 0139 are toxigenic strains of Vibrio species,
which cause epidemic cholera; severe dehydration requiring vigorous
fluid replacement may be necessary. Non-cholera Vibrio species do not
possess the virulence factors required to cause epidemic cholera.
Antimicrobial treatment differs between toxigenic and non-toxigenic
Vibrio species.
Case 69-2 (Questions 1–3),
Case 69-3 (Questions 1, 2)
Salmonella species are classified as non-typhoidal and typhoidal
salmonellae. Non-typhoidalsalmonellae may cause the clinical
syndromes of gastroenteritis, bacteremia, and localized infection,
whereas typhoidalsalmonellae may cause typhoid fever and chronic
carriage. The role of antimicrobials in the management of salmonellosis
is based on the clinicalsyndrome, its severity, and underlying health
problems of infected persons.
Case 69-7 (Question 1),
Case 69-8 (Questions 1, 2),
Case 69-9 (Question 1),
Case 69-10 (Question 1),
Case 69-11 (Questions 1–7)
Severe dysentery caused by Shigella species is most commonly caused
by Shigella dysenteriae, whereas a milder illness is typically caused by
Shigella sonnei. Antimicrobials alleviate the symptoms of shigellosis, and
decrease the period of time that shigellae can be spread by person-toperson contact.
Case 69-12 (Questions 1–5),
Case 69-13 (Question 1)
Fluoroquinolone-resistance in Campylobacter species is a common
finding in both developed and underdeveloped areas of the world; when
indicated, macrolide antimicrobials are recommended.
Case 69-14 (Questions 1–3)
Travelers to destinations where acquisition of Travelers’ diarrhea (TD)
is a concern should bring a travel kit including medications (e.g.,
loperamide and antimicrobials) and instructions for self-treatment at the
onset of illness. The selected antimicrobial depends on the area of
Case 69-15 (Questions 1–6)
travel. Long-term postinfectious complications of TD may occur in
some returning travelers.
Escherichia coli O157:H7 is a specific toxin-producing strain of E. coli
bacteria that can lead to the severe sequelae of hemolytic uremic
syndrome.
Case 69-16 (Questions 3, 4)
Clostridium difficile infection causes a wide range of severity of illness.
Mild-to-moderate disease is typically treated with metronidazole as firstline therapy, and oral vancomycin is preferred for severe disease.
Case 69-17 (Question 6)
Severe C. difficile infection can be life-threatening and often
necessitates multiple therapeutic interventions.
Case 69-18 (Questions 4, 5)
p. 1446
p. 1447
PREVALENCE AND ETIOLOGY
Worldwide, diarrhea accounts for more than 2.5 million deaths annually,
1 mainly
affecting infants and children living in poverty.
2 Prolonged episodes of diarrhea lead
to malnutrition and in children contribute to impaired growth and developmental
delay.
2
In the United States, about 48 million foodborne diarrheal illnesses occur
each year, resulting in 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths.
3
Infectious diarrhea is caused by the ingestion of food or water contaminated with
pathogenic microorganisms (e.g., bacteria, viruses, protozoa, or fungi) or their toxins
(Table 69-1).
2
In the United States, noroviruses account for about 50% of diarrheal
outbreaks, while common bacterial pathogens include Campylobacter, non-typhoidal
Salmonella, Shigella, and Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli.
3
Table 69-1
Predisposing Factors, Symptoms, and Therapy of Gastrointestinal Infections
Pathogen
Predisposing
Factors Symptoms
Diagnostic
Evaluations
Drug of
Choice
a
,
c Alternatives
a
,
Salmonella (nontyphoidal)
b
Ingestion of
contaminated
poultry, raw milk,
custards, and cream
fillings; foreign
travel
Nausea, vomiting,
diarrhea, cramps,
fever,
tenesmus.Incubation:
6–72 hours
Fecal
leukocytes,
stool culture
Fluoroquinolone,
azithromycin,
third-generation
cephalosporins
Amoxicillin,
TMP–SMX
Salmonella
(typhoidal)
Ingestion of
contaminated food;
foreign travel
High fever,
abdominal pain,
headache, dry cough
Fecal
leukocytes,
stool culture,
Fluoroquinolone,
azithromycin,
third-generation
TMP–SMX,
amoxicillin
blood culture cephalosporins
Shigella Ingestion of
contaminated salad,
raw vegetables,
swimming in water
contaminated with
sewage; foreign
travel
Fever, dysentery,
cramps,
tenesmus.Incubation:
24–48 hours
Fecal
leukocytes,
stool culture
Fluoroquinolone,
azithromycin,
ceftriaxone
TMP–SMX,
ampicillin
Campylobacter Contaminated eggs,
raw milk, or poultry;
foreign travel
Mild-to-severe
diarrhea; fever,
systemic malaise.
Incubation: 24–72
hours
Fecal
leukocytes,
stool culture
Erythromycin,
azithromycin
–
Clostridium
difficile
Antibiotics,
antineoplastics
Mild-to-severe
diarrhea, cramps
C. difficile
toxin, C.
difficile
culture,
colonoscopy
Metronidazole Vancomycin
Staphylococcal
food poisoning
Custard-filled
bakery products,
canned food,
processed meat, ice
cream
Nausea, vomiting,
salivation, cramps,
diarrhea; usually
resolves in 8
hours.Incubation: 2–
6 hours
– Supportive
therapy only
–
Travelers’
diarrhea
(Enterotoxigenic
Escherichia coli,
Campylobacter)
Contaminated food
(vegetables and
cheese), water;
foreign travel
Nausea, vomiting,
mild-to-severe
diarrhea, cramps
Stool culture See Table 69-3 –
Shiga
toxin–producing
Escherichia coli
(E. coli
O157:H7)
Beef, raw milk,
water
Diarrhea, headache,
bloody
stoolsIncubation: 48–
96 hours
Stool cultures
on
MacConkey’s
sorbitol
Supportive
therapy only
–
Cryptosporidiosis Immunosuppression,
day-care centers,
contaminated water,
animal handlers
Mild-to-severe
diarrhea (chronic or
self-limited); large
fluid volume
Stool
screening for
oocytes,
PCR, ELISA
See Chapter 77,
Opportunistic
Infections in
HIV-Infected
Patients
–
Viral
gastroenteritis
Community-wide
outbreaks,
contaminated food
Nausea, diarrhea
(self-limited),
cramps. Incubation:
16–48 hours
Special viral
studies
Supportive
therapy only
–
aSources: Navaneethan U, Giannella RA. Mechanisms of infectious diarrhea. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol
2008;5:637; DuPont HL. Acute infectious diarrhea in immunocompetent adults. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1532. See
text for doses and duration of therapy.
bNot all cases require antibiotic therapy. See text for details.
c
If susceptible. See text for details.
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; TMP–SMX, trimethoprim–
sulfamethoxazole.
p. 1447
p. 1448
This chapter focuses on the diagnosis and management of the common microbial
causes of acute infectious diarrhea.
DEFINITIONS
Diarrhea is often defined as three or more episodes of loose stools or any loose stool
with blood during a 24-hour period, which may be accompanied by nausea, vomiting,
or abdominal cramping.
3 The duration of illness is considered acute if symptoms are
present for less than 2 weeks duration, persistent if symptoms last for 14 to 29 days,
and chronic if symptoms last ≥30 days.
3 Classifying diarrheal syndromes as either a
noninflammatory (watery diarrhea) or an inflammatory (bloody diarrhea) illness
provides a basis for predicting the most likely microbial cause for the intestinal
illness.
1
PATHOGENESIS
The pathogenesis of infectious diarrhea involves an interplay among bacterial
virulence factors, host factors, and predisposing factors to infection. Diarrhea is
more likely to occur in the setting in which an imbalance among these factors favors
the enteropathogen.
Bacterial Virulence Factors
Enteropathogens possess virulence factors that contribute to the organism’s
pathogenicity.
2 Enterotoxins targeting the small bowel cause net movement of fluid
into the gut lumen, leading to voluminous watery stools and potentially lifethreatening dehydration. Cytotoxins targeting the colon cause direct mucosal damage,
leading to fever and bloody diarrhea. Invasive properties of Shigella species and
invasive strains of E. coli allow these bacteria to invade and destroy epithelial cells,
causing bloody or mucoid stools. Some enteropathogens induce a vigorous host
response through the release of proinflammatory cytokines from intestinal epithelial
cells, leading to diarrhea. Finally, adhesions allow enteropathogens to attach to and
colonize the gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa, facilitating toxin delivery, invasion,
dissemination, or host cell lysis.
2
Host Defenses
The human GI tract possesses numerous defense mechanisms to protect against
enteric infection. Normal bacterial flora compete for space and nutrients with
potentially pathogenic organisms, or produce substances, e.g., short-chain fatty acids,
that are inhibitory to enteropathogens.
2 Gastric acidity of the stomach prevents acidsusceptible pathogens from passing from the stomach into the intestinal tract, whereas
gastrointestinal mucus and mucosal tissue integrity provide physical barriers against
infection. Intestinal immunity includes defensins that are bactericidal to some
enteropathogens, local production of antibodies, and toll-like receptors that
recognize enteropathogens and activate the immune response.
2
Intestinal peristalsis
moves bacteria and their toxins along and out of the GI tract. Finally, specific host
genetic factors are protective against enteric infection.
3
Predisposing Factors
Inadequate sanitation facilities increase the risk that local inhabitants and travelers
will be exposed to contaminated food and water. Outbreaks of foodborne or
waterborne illnesses in both industrialized and developing countries facilitate the
spread of infectious organisms. Industrialized countries that rely on imported food
items risk the possibility of importation of contaminated food products.
4
Immunocompromised hosts, such as organ transplant recipients and patients receiving
immunosuppressive therapies, are more susceptible to intestinal infection.
Institutional settings such as day-care centers, hospitals, and extended-care facilities
are high-risk settings for dissemination of disease. Finally, poor personal hygiene is
a risk for infectious diarrhea.
Table 69-2
Pharmacologic Agents that May Promote Gastrointestinal Infection
Drug Mechanism
Antacids, H2
-receptor antagonists, proton-pump
inhibitors
Increase of gastric pH; passage of viable pathogens to
lower gut
Antibiotics Alteration of intestinal flora
Cancer chemotherapy Unclear but may include the antimicrobial activity of
chemotherapeutic agents, or chemotherapy-induced
intestinal damage and necrosis favoring an anaerobic
environment for the growth of C. difficile.
Source: DuPont HL. Acute infectious diarrhea in immunocompetent adults. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1532; Cohen
SH et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society of
Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect
Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:431; Anand A, Glatt AE. Clostridium difficile infection associated with
antineoplastic chemotherapy: a review. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;17:109.
The use of pharmacologic agents, e.g., drugs that increase gastric pH (Table 69-2),
increases the risk for infection with acid-susceptible pathogens such as Salmonella
species and Vibrio cholerae.
5 The use of proton-pump inhibitors predisposes patients
to Clostridium difficile diarrhea.
MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW
Rehydration Therapy
The most common complication of any diarrheal illness is loss of fluids and
electrolytes, which in extreme cases can lead to hypovolemia, shock, and death.
1
Depending on the degree of dehydration, fluid and electrolyte losses are replaced
intravenously (IV) or orally. Once replacement of fluid and electrolyte losses is
completed, additional laboratory tests and drug therapies can be considered.
Laboratory Tests
Inflammatory diarrheal illnesses are characterized by the presence of bloody or
mucoid stools. Therefore, stool specimens with red blood cells (RBCs) or occult
blood, or those that contain large numbers of white blood cells, suggest infection
attributable to invasive pathogens.
6
Identification of bacterial toxins in stool specimens is a useful diagnostic tool. For
example, because only the toxigenic strains of C. difficile are pathogenic, the
presence or absence of bacterial toxins in stool specimens is more important than a
positive culture for the organism.
7
p. 1448
p. 1449
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع