Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Neisseria meningitides
Enterobacteriaceae
Pseudomonas
Varicella zoster virus
Candida
Aspergillus
(pneumonia, cutaneous
lesions, sepsis
Symptoms in these patients are insidious because early in the course of disease they are related to the primary
infection in the lung. Once enough purulent exudate is formed, typical physical and radiographic findings
indicative of an empyema are produced.
Laboratory diagnosis of lower Respiratory tract infections:
Specimen collection and transport:
Although rapid determination of the etiologic agent is of paramount importance in managing pneumonia, the
responsible pathogen is not identified in as many as 50% of patients, despite extensive diagnostic testing.
Sputum
Expectorated. The examination of expectorated sputum has been the primary means of determining the causes
of bacterial pneumonia. However, lower respiratory tract secretions will be contaminated with upper respiratory
tract secretions, especially saliva, unless they are collected using an invasive technique. For this reason, sputum
is among the least clinically relevant specimens received for culture in microbiology laboratories, even though
it is one of the most numerous and time-consuming specimens.
Good sputum samples: depend on thorough health care worker education and patient understanding throughout
all phases of the collection process. Food should not have been ingested for 1 to 2 hours before expectoration
and the mouth should be rinsed with saline or water just before expectoration. Patients shouldbe instructed to
provide a deep-coughed specimen.
The material should be expelled into a sterile container, with an attempt to minimize contamination by saliva.
Specimens should be transported to the laboratory immediately. Even a moderate amount of time at room
temperature can result in the loss of viable infectious agents and the recovery of pathogens.
Induced. Patients unable to produce sputum may be assisted by respiratory therapists, who use postural
drainage and thoracic percussion to stimulate production of acceptable sputum. Before specimen collection,
patients should brush the buccal mucosa, tongue, and gums with a wet toothbrush. As an alternative, an aerosolinduced specimen may be collected for the isolation of mycobacterial or fungal agents. Induced sputum is also
recognized for its high diagnostic yield in cases of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. Aerosol-induced
specimens are collected by allowing the patient to breathe aerosolized droplets, using an ultrasonic nebulizer
containing 10% 0.85% NaCl or until a strong cough reflex is initiated.
Lower respiratory secretions obtained in this way appear watery, resembling saliva, although they often contain
material directly from alveolar spaces. These specimens are usually adequate for culture and should be accepted
207
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
in the laboratory without prescreening. Obtaining such a specimen may obviate the need for a more invasive
procedure, such as bronchoscopy or needle aspiration.
The gastric aspirate is used exclusively for isolation of acid-fast bacilli and may be collected from patients who
are unable to produce sputum, particularly young children. Before the patient wakes up in the morning, a
nasogastric tube is inserted into the stomach and contents are withdrawn (on the assumption that acid-fast
bacilli from the respiratory tract were swallowed during the night and will be present in the stomach). The
relative resistance of mycobacteria to acidity allows them to remain viable for a short period. Gastric aspirate
specimens must be delivered to the laboratory immediately so that the acidity can be neutralized. Specimens
can be neutralized and then transported if immediate delivery is not possible.
Endotracheal or Tracheostomy Suction Specimens:
Patients with tracheostomies are unable to produce sputum in the normal fashion, but lower respiratory tract
secretions can easily be collected in a Lukens trap. Tracheostomy aspirates or tracheostomy suction specimens
should be treated as sputum by the laboratory.
Patients with tracheostomies rapidly become colonized with gram-negative bacilli and other nosocomial
pathogens. Such colonization per se is not clinically relevant, but these organisms may be aspirated into the
lungs and cause pneumonia. Culture results should be correlated with clinical signs and symptoms.
Bronchoscopy. Bronchoscopy specimens include bronchoalveolar
lavage (BAL), bronchial washing, bronchial brushing, and transbronchial biopsies. The diagnosis of
pneumonia, particularly in HIV-infected and other immunocompromised patients, often necessitates the use of
more invasive procedures. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy has dramatically affected the evaluation and management
of these infections. With this method, the
bronchial mucosa can be directly visualized and collected for biopsy, and the lung tissue can be sent for
transbronchial biopsy for the evaluation of lung cancer and other lung diseases. Although transbronchial biopsy
is important, the procedure is often associated with significant complications such as bleeding.
The sample should be transported in sterile 0.85% saline. During bronchoscopy, physicians obtain bronchial
washings or aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples, protected bronchial brush samples, or specimens
for transbronchial biopsy. Bronchial washings or
aspirates are collected using a small amount of sterile physiologic saline inserted into the bronchial tree and
withdrawing the fluid. These specimens will be contaminated with upper respiratory tract flora such as viridians
streptococci and Neisseria spp. Recovery of potentially pathogenic organisms from bronchial washings should
be attempted.
A deep sampling of desquamated host cells and secretions can be collected through bronchoscopy and BAL.
Lavages are especially suitable for detecting Pneumocystis cysts and fungal elements. During this procedure, a
high volume of saline (100 to 300 mL) is infused into a lung segment through the bronchoscope to obtain cells
and protein of the pulmonary interstitium and alveolar spaces. It is estimated that more than 1 million alveoli
are sampled during this process. The value of this technique in conjunction with quantitative culture for the
diagnosis of most major respiratory tract pathogens, including bacterial pneumonia, has been documented.
Scientists have found significant correlation between acute bacterial pneumonia and greater than 103 to 104
208
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
bacterial colonies per milliliter of BAL fluid. BAL has been shown to be a safe and practical method for
diagnosing opportunistic pulmonary infections in immunosuppressed patients. At bedside, nonbronchoscopic
“mini BAL” using a Metras catheter has been introduced; typically 20 mL or less of saline is instilled.
Another type of respiratory specimen is obtained via a protected catheter bronchial brush as part of a
bronchoscopy examination. Specimens obtained by this moderately invasive collection procedure are suited for
microbiologic studies, particularly in aspiration pneumonia. Protected specimen brush bristles collect from
0.001 to 0.01 mL of material, Upon receipt, contents of the bronchial brush may be suspended in 1 mL of broth
solution with vigorous vortexing and inoculated onto culture media using a 0.01-mL calibrated inoculating
loop. Some researchers have indicated that specimens obtained via double-lumen–protected catheters are
suitable for both anaerobic and aerobic cultures.
Colony counts of greater than or equal to 1000 organisms per milliliter in the broth diluent (or 106/ mL in the
original specimen) have been considered to correlate with infection.
Transtracheal Aspirates. Percutaneous transtracheal aspirates (TTAs) are obtained by inserting a small plastic
catheter into the trachea via a needle previously inserted through the skin and cricothyroid membrane. This
invasive procedure, although somewhat uncomfortable for the patient and not suitable for all patients (it cannot
be used in uncooperative patients, in patients with bleeding tendency, or in patients with poor oxygenation),
reduces the likelihood that a specimen will be contaminated by upper respiratory tract flora and diluted by
added fluids, provided care is taken to keep the catheter from being coughed back up into the pharynx.
Although this technique is rarely used, anaerobes, such as Actinomyces and those associated with aspiration
pneumonia, can be isolated from TTA specimens.
Other Invasive Procedures. When pleural empyema is present, thoracentesis may be used to obtain infected
fluid for direct examination and culture. This constitutes an excellent specimen that accurately reflects the
bacteriology of an associated pneumonia.
Blood cultures, of course, should always be obtained from patients with pneumonia. For patients with
pneumonia, a thin needle aspiration of material from the involved area of the lung may be performed
percutaneously. If no material is withdrawn into the syringe after the first try, approximately 3 mL of sterile
saline can be injected and then withdrawn into the syringe. Patients with emphysema, uremia,
thrombocytopenia, or pulmonary hypertension may be at increased risk of complication (primarily
pneumothorax [air in the pleural space] or bleeding) from this procedure.
The specimens obtained are very small in volume, and protection from aeration is usually impossible. This
technique is more frequently used in children than in adults.
The most invasive procedure for obtaining respiratory tract specimens is the open lung biopsy. Performed by
surgeons, this method is used to procure a wedge of lung tissue. Biopsy specimens are extremely helpful for
diagnosing severe viral infections, such as herpes simplex pneumonia, for rapid diagnosis of Pneumocystis
pneumonia, and for other hard-to-diagnose or life-threatening pneumonias.
209
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
Specimen processing:
Direct Visual Examination:
Lower respiratory tract specimens can be examined by direct wet preparation for parasites and special
procedures for Pneumocystis. Fungal elements can be visualized under phase microscopy with 10% potassium
hydroxide, under ultraviolet light with calcofluor white, or using periodic acid-Schiff–stained smears.
For most other evaluations, the specimen must be fixed and stained. Bacteria and yeasts can be recognized on
Gram stain. One of the most important uses of the Gram stain, however, is to evaluate the quality of
expectorated sputum received for routine bacteriologic culture.
A portion of the specimen consisting of purulent material is chosen for the stain. The smear can be evaluated
adequately even before it is stained, thus negating the need for Gram stain of specimens later judged
unacceptable.
An acceptable specimen yields fewer than 10 squamous epithelial cells per low-power field (100×). The
number of white blood cells may not be relevant, because many patients are severely neutropenic and
specimens from these patients will not show white blood cells on Gram stain examination. On the other hand,
the presence of 25 or more polymorphonuclear leukocytes per 100× field, together with few squamous
epithelial cells, implies an excellent specimen.
Samples that contain predominantly upper respiratory tract material should be rejected. Previously, only
expectorated sputa were suitable for rejection based on microscopic screening. However, endotracheal aspirates
(ETAs) from mechanically ventilated adult patients can be screened by Gram stain. Criteria used to reject ETAs
from adult patients include greater than 10 squamous epithelial cells per low-power field or no organisms seen
under oil immersion (1000×). In Legionella pneumonia, sputum may be scant and watery, with few or no host
cells. Such specimens may be positive by direct fluorescent antibody stain and culture, and they should not be
subjected to screening procedures. Conversely, sputum from patients with CF should be screened. A throat
swab is an acceptable specimen from patients with CF in selected clinical settings and should be processed in a
Figure 1Gram stain of sputum specimens. A, This specimen contains numerous polymorphonuclear
leukocytes and no visible squamous epithelial cells, indicating that the specimen is acceptable for
routine bacteriologic culture. B, This specimen contains numerous squamousepithelial cells and rare
polymorphonuclear leukocytes, indicating an inadequate specimen for routine sputum culture.
210
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
similar manner as CF sputum. Staining of respiratory samples is useful and should be compared to culture
results to reveal errors in procedures, specimen collection, and transport or specimen identification.
Respiratory secretions may need to be concentrated before staining. The cytocentrifuge instrument has been
used successfully for this purpose, concentrating the cellular material in an easily examined monolayer on a
glass slide. As an alternative, specimens are centrifuged, and the sediment is used for visual examinations and
cultures.
For screening purposes, the presence of ciliated columnar bronchial epithelial cells, goblet cells, or pulmonary
macrophages in specimens obtained by bronchoscopy or BAL indicates a specimen from the lower respiratory
tract.
In addition to the Gram stain, respiratory specimens may be stained for acid-fast bacilli with either the classic
Ziehl-Neelsen or the Kinyoun carbolfuchsin stain. Auramine or auramine-rhodamine is also used to detect
acidfast organisms. Because they are fluorescent, these stains fluorescent superior already here comment only
are more sensitive than the carbolfuchsin formulas and are preferable for rapid screening. Slides may be
restained with the classic stains directly over the fluorochrome stains as long as all of the immersion oil has
been removed carefully with xylene. All of the acid-fast stains will reveal Cryptosporidium spp. if they are
present in the respiratory tract, as may occur in immunosuppressed patients. These patients are often at risk of
infection with P. jiroveci.
Although the modified Gomori methenamine silver stain has been used traditionally to recognize Nocardia,
Actinomyces, fungi, and parasites, it takes approximately 1 hour of the technologist’s time to perform, is
technically demanding, and is not suitable as an emergency procedure.
A fairly rapid stain, toluidine blue O, has been used in many laboratories with some success. Toluidine blue O
stains Pneumocystis, Nocardia asteroides, and some fungi.
A monoclonal antibody stain is the optimum stain for Pneumocystis for less invasive specimens such as BAL
and induced sputa.
Direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) staining has been used to detect Legionella spp. in lower respiratory tract
specimens. Sputum, pleural fluid, aspirated material, and tissues are all suitable specimens. Because there are
so many different serotypes of legionellae, polyclonal antibody reagents and a monoclonal antibody directed
against all serotypes of Legionella pneumophila are used.Because of low sensitivity (50% to 75%), DFA results
should not be relied on in lieu of culture. Rather, Legionella culture, DFA or urinary antigen, and serology
should be performed for optimum sensitivity.
Commercially available DFA reagents are also used to detect antigens of numerous viruses, including herpes
simplex, cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, influenza viruses, and RSV .Commercial suppliers of reagents provide
procedure information for each of these tests. Monoclonal and polyclonal fluorescent stains for Chlamydia
trachomatis are available and may be useful for staining respiratory secretions of infants with pneumonia.
A number of molecular amplification techniques for the direct detection of respiratory pathogens have been
described; however, the sensitivity and specificity of these assays vary greatly from one study to another.
Amplification assays are also available for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on smearpositive
specimens.
211
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
Rapid direct detection from respiratory samples is now available using nucleic acid-based methods. The xTAG
Respiratory Viral Panel (RVP) , can be used for the simultaneous detection of influenza (four types), RSV,
human metapneumovirus,
and adenovirus from nasopharyngeal swabs. In addition, the FilmArray Respiratory Panel is capable of
detecting upper respiratory tract infections associated with coronavirus (four types) , adenovirus, influenza (five
types), rhinovirus, parainfluenza virus (four types), enterovirus, human metapneumovirus, RSV, Bordetella
pertussis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydophila pneumonia in approximately 1 hour directly from
patient samples. Smaller molecular panels are also available such as the real-time multiplex amplification kit
for influenza A, B, and RSV. All of the previously mentioned methods are FDA-approved.
In addition to these, there are a variety of research-useonly and other molecular respiratory panels in clinical
validation studies. It is important when considering the use of a molecular assay that the laboratory consider
their patient population including severity of illness, immune status, and transplant histories.
Routine Culture:
Most of the commonly sought etiologic agents of lower respiratory tract infection are isolated on routine media:
5% sheep blood agar, MacConkey agar for the isolation and differentiation of gram-negative bacilli, and
chocolate agar for Haemophilus and Neisseria spp. Because of contaminating oral flora, sputum specimens,
specimens obtained by bronchial washing and lavage, tracheal aspirates, and tracheostomy or endotracheal tube
aspirates are not inoculated to enrichment broth or incubated anaerobically. Only specimens obtained by
percutaneous aspiration (including transtracheal aspiration) and protected bronchial brush are suitable for
anaerobic culture; the latter must be done quantitatively for proper interpretation. Transtracheal and
percutaneous lung aspiration material may be inoculated to enriched thioglycollate as well as to solid media.
For suspected cases of Legionnaires’ disease, buffered charcoal-yeast extract (BCYE) agar and selective BCYE
should be inoculated. Plates should be streaked in four quadrants to provide a basis for objective
semiquantitatio to define the amount of growth. After 24 to 48 hours of incubation, the numbers and types of
colonies are recorded. For Legionella cultures, colonies form on the selective agar after 3 to 5 days at 35° C.
Sputum specimens from patients known to have CF should be inoculated to selective agar, such as specific
chromagenic agar, for recovery of S. aureus and selective horse blood–bacitracin, incubated anaerobically and
aerobically, for recovery of H. influenzae that may be obscured by the mucoid Pseudomonas on routine media.
The use of a selective medium for B. cepacia, such as PC
or OFPBL agars, is also necessary. For interpretation of culture results on those specimens contaminated by
normal oropharyngeal flora (e.g., expectorated and induced sputum, bronchial washings), growth of the
predominant aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria is reported. To ensure optimum culture reporting,
conditions must be well defined in terms of an objective grading system for streaked plates. Finally, the clinical
significance of culture findings depends not only on standardized and appropriate laboratory methods but also
on how specimens are collected and transported, other laboratory data, and the patient’s clinical presentation.
Numerous bacterial agents that cause lower respiratory tract infections are not detected by routine bacteriologic
culture. Mycobacteria, Chlamydia, Nocardia, Bordetella pertussis, Legionella, and Mycoplasma pneumonia
require special procedures for detection; this also applies
212
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
to viruses and fungi. Optimal recovery for Mycobacterium tuberculosis requires multiple specimens for acidfast staining culture, and at least one sample for molecular testing as recommended by the Centers for Disease
Control.
Refer to the appropriate chapter section for more information regarding these organisms. Finally, one must keep
in mind those potential agents for bioterrorist attack, such as Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis, and
Yersinia pestis, that might be recovered from respiratory Specimens.
Upper Respiratory Tract Infections and other Infections of the Oral Cavity and Neck:
The upper respiratory tract includes all the structures down to the larynx: the sinuses, throat, nasal cavity,
epiglottis, and larynx; the throat is also called the pharynx.
The pharynx is a tubelike structure that extends from the base of the skull to the esophagus. Made of muscle,
this structure is divided into three parts:
• Nasopharynx (portion of the pharynx above the soft palate)
• Oropharynx (portion of the pharynx between the soft palate and epiglottis)
• Laryngopharynx (portion of the pharynx below the epiglottis that opens into the larynx)
The oropharynx and nasopharynx are lined with stratified squamous epithelial cells that are teeming with
microbial flora. The tonsils are contained within the oropharynx; the larynx is located between the root of the
tongue and the upper end of the trachea.
Pathogenesis
It is important to keep in mind that upper respiratory tract infections may spread and become more serious
because the mucosa (mucous membrane) of the upper tract is continuous with the mucosal lining of the sinuses,
eustachian tube, middle ear, and lower respiratory tract.
Diseases of the upper respiratory tract
Diseases of the upper respiratory tract are named according to the anatomic sites involved. Most of these
infections are self-limiting, and the majority of infections are of viral origin.
Laryngitis:Acute laryngitis is usually associated with the common cold or influenza syndromes.
Characteristically, patients complain of hoarseness and lowering or deepening of the voice. Acute laryngitis is
generally a benign illness.
Acute laryngitis is almost exclusively associated with viral infection. Although numerous viruses can cause
laryngitis, adenoviruses, coronavirus, and human metapneumovirus are the most common etiologic agents.
If examination of the larynx reveals an exudate or membrane on the pharyngeal or laryngeal mucosa,
streptococcal infection, mononucleosis, or diphtheria should be suspected. Chronic laryngitis, although less
frequently associated with infectious agents, may be caused by bacteria or fungal isolates.
Infections have been identified that are associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
and Candida spp.
213
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
Laryngotracheobronchitis
Another clinical syndrome closely related to laryngitis is acute laryngotracheobronchitis, or croup. Croup is a
relatively common illness in young children, primarily those younger than 3 years of age. Of significance,
croup can represent a potentially more serious disease if the infection extends downward from the larynx to
involve the trachea or even the bronchi. Illness is characterized by variable fever, inspiratory stridor (difficulty
in moving enough air through the larynx), hoarseness, and a harsh, barking, nonproductive cough. These
symptoms last for 3 to 4 days, although the cough may persist for a longer period. In young infants, severe
respiratory distress and fever are common symptoms Similar to the etiologic agents of laryngitis, viruses are a
primary cause of croup; parainfluenza viruses are the major etiologic agents. In addition to parainfluenza
viruses, influenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, and adenoviruses can also cause croup.
Also capable of causing croup, though not as frequently, are Mycoplasma pneumoniae, rhinoviruses, and
enteroviruses.
Epiglottitis: Epiglottitis is an infection of the epiglottis and other soft tissues above the vocal cords. Infection
of the epiglottis can lead to significant edema (swelling) and inflammation. Most commonly, children between
the ages of 2 and 6 years of age are infected. These children typically present with fever, difficulty in
swallowing because of pain, drooling, and respiratory obstruction with inspiratory stridor. Epiglottitis is a
potentially life-threatening disease because the patient’s airway can become completely obstructed (blocked) if
not treated.
In contrast to laryngitis, epiglottitis is usually associated with bacterial infections. In the past, 2- to 4-year-old
children were typically infected with Haemophilus influenza type b as the primary cause of epiglottitis.
However, due to the common use of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugated vaccine, the typical patient is
an adult with a sore throat. Other organisms occasionally implicated are streptococci and staphylococci.
Diagnosis is established on clinical grounds, including the visualization of the epiglottis, which appears swollen
and bright red in color.
Bacteriologic culture of the epiglottis is contraindicated because swabbing of the epiglottis may lead to
respiratory obstruction. Of importance, H. influenzae bacteremia usually occurs in children with epiglottitis
caused by this organism.
Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis:Pharyngitis (sore throat) and tonsillitis are common upper respiratory tract
infections affecting both children and adults. Acute pharyngitis is an illness that frequently causes people to
seek medical care
Clinical Manifestations. Infection of the pharynx is associated with pharyngeal pain. Visualization of the
pharynx reveals erythematous (red) and swollen tissue.
Depending on the causative microorganism, either inflammatory exudate (fluid with protein, inflammatory
cells, and cellular debris), vesicles (small blister-like sacs containing liquid) and mucosal ulceration, or
nasopharyngeal lymphoid hyperplasia (swollen lymph nodes) may be observed.
Pathogenesis. Pathogenic mechanisms differ and depend on the organism causing the pharyngitis. For
example, some organisms directly invade the pharyngeal mucosa (e.g., Arcanobacterium haemolyticum), others
214
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
elaborate toxins and other virulence factors at the site (e.g., Corynebacterium diphtheriae), and still others
invade the pharyngeal mucosa and elaborate toxins and other virulence factors (e.g., group A streptococci
[Streptococcus pyogenes]).
Epidemiology/Etiologic Agents. Most cases of pharyngitis occur during the colder months and often
accompany other infections, primarily those caused by viruses. Patients with respiratory tract infections caused
by influenza types A and B, parainfluenza, coxsackie A, rhinoviruses, or coronaviruses frequently complain of
a sore throat. Pharyngitis, often with ulceration, is also commonly found in patients with infectious
mononucleosis caused by either Epstein-Barr virus or cytomegalovirus.
Although less common, pharyngitis caused by adenovirus or herpes simplex virus is clinically severe. Finally,
acute retroviral syndrome caused by human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) is associated with acute
pharyngitis.
Although different bacteria can cause pharyngitis or tonsillitis, the primary cause of bacterial pharyngitis is
Streptococcus pyogenes (or group A beta-hemolytic streptococci).
Viral pharyngitis or other causes of pharyngitis/ tonsillitis must be differentiated from that caused by S.
pyogenes, because pharyngitis resulting from S. pyogenes is treatable with penicillin and a variety of other
antimicrobials, whereas viral infections are not. In addition, treatment is of particular importance because
infection with S. pyogenes can lead to complications such as acute rheumatic fever and glomerulonephritis.
These complications are referred to as poststreptococcal sequelae (diseases that follow a streptococcal
infection) and are primarily immunologically mediated.
S. pyogenes may also cause pyogenic infections (suppurations) of the tonsils, sinuses, and middle ear, or
cellulitis as secondary pyogenic sequelae after an episode of pharyngitis. Accordingly, streptococcal pharyngitis
is usually treated to prevent both the suppurative and nonsuppurative sequelae, as well as to decrease morbidity.
Although bacteria other than group A streptococci may cause pharyngitis, this occurs less often. Large colony
isolates of groups C and G streptococci (classified as Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis) are
pyogenic streptococci with similar virulence traits as S. pyogenes; symptoms of pharyngitis caused by these
agents are also similar to S. pyogenes. In contrast to S. pyogenes, these agents are rarely associated with
poststreptococcal sequelae, namely glomerulonephritis and possibly rheumatic fever.
Recent studies have demonstrated that these streptococci can exchange genetic information with S. pyogenes
and thus potentially obtain virulence factors usually associated with S. pyogenes such as M proteins,
streptolysin O, and superantigen genes. Arcanobacterium haemolyticum is also a cause of pharyngitis among
adolescents. Examples of agents that can cause pharyngitis or tonsillitis are listed in (Table 1).
Table 1: Examples of bacteria that can cause acute pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis:
Organism Disease RelativeFrequency
Pharyngitis/tonsillitis/ rheumatic 15% to 35%
fever/ scarlet fever
Streptococcus
Pyogenes
Group C and G beta-hemolytic Pharyngitis/tonsillitis <3% to 11%
streptococci
215
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
Pharyngitis/tonsillitis/ <1% to 10%
Rash
Arcanobacterium
(Corynebacterium)
haemolyticum
Pharyngitis/ disseminated Rare*
Disease
Neisseria
gonorrhoeae
Corynebacterium Pharyngitis Rare
ulcerans
Pneumonia/bronchitis/ Rare
Pharyngitis
Mycoplasma
pneumoniae
Yersinia Pharyngitis/enterocolitis Rare
enterocolitica
Human immunodeficiency Pharyngitis/acute retroviral disease Rare
virus-1
Although H. influenzae, S. aureus, and S. pneumoniae are frequently isolated from nasopharyngeal and throat
cultures, they have not been shown to cause pharyngitis. Carriage of any of these organisms, as well as
Neisseria meningitidis, may have clinical importance for some patients. Cultures of specimens obtained from
the anterior often yield S. aureus. The carriage rate for this organism is especially high among health care
workers, and 10%-30% of the general population can be colonized with this microbe, depending on the
population characteristics.
Vincent’s angina, also called acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis, or trench mouth, is a mixed
bacterialspirochetal infection of the gingival edge. The infection is relatively rare today, but it is considered a
serious disease because it is often complicated by septic jugular thrombophlebitis, bacteremia, and widespread
metastatic infection.
Adults are more often affected than children; poor oral hygiene is a predisposing factor. Multiple anaerobes,
especially Fusobacterium necrophorum, are implicated in this syndrome. Although Gram stain of a throat
specimen is usually not predictive, in those patients with symptoms suggestive of Vincent’s angina, Gram stain
reveals numerous fusiform, gram-negative bacilli, and spirochetes.
Peritonsillar Abscesses:Peritonsillar abscesses are generally considered a complication of tonsillitis. This
infection is most common in children older than 5 years of age and in young adults. It is important to treat these
infections because they can spread to adjacent tissues, as well as erode into the carotid artery to cause an acute
hemorrhage. The predominant organisms isolated in peritonsillar abscesses include non–spore-forming
anaerobes, such as Fusobacterium (especially F. necrophorum), Bacteroides (including the B. fragilis group),
and anaerobic cocci. Streptococcus pyogenes and viridans streptococci may also be involved.
Rhinitis:Rhinitis (common cold) is an inflammation of the nasal mucous membrane or lining. Depending on
the host response and the etiologic agent, rhinitis is characterized by variable fever, increased mucous
secretions, inflammatory edema of the nasal mucosa, sneezing, and watery eyes. With rare exceptions, rhinitis
is typically associated with viral infections (20%-25%); some of these agents are listed in (Table 1). Rhinitis is
216
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
common because of the large number of different causative viruses, and reinfections may occur. Bacterial
agents associated with rhinitis (10%-15%) include Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma
pneumoniae, and Group A streptococci.
(Table 1): Viral Agents That Can Cause Rhinitis:
Rhinoviruses
Coronaviruses
Adenoviruses
Parainfluenza and influenza viruses
Respiratory syncytial virus
Enterovirus
Miscellaneous Infections Caused by Other Agents:
Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Pharyngitis caused by Corynebacterium diphtheriae is less common than
streptococcal pharyngitis. After an incubation period of 2 to 4 days, diphtheria usually presents as pharyngitis
or tonsillitis.
Patients are often febrile and complain of sore throat and malaise (body discomfort). The hallmark for
diphtheria is the presence of an exudate or membrane that is usually on the tonsils or pharyngeal wall. The
graywhite
membrane is a result of the action of diphtheria toxin on the epithelium at the site of infection. Complications
occur frequently with diphtheria and are usually seen during the last stage of the disease (paroxysmal stage).
The most feared complications are those involving the central nervous system such as seizures, coma, or
blindness.
Bordetella pertussis. Although mass immunization programs have greatly reduced the incidence of pertussis,
enough cases (because of outbreaks and regional epidemics) still occur. In 2010, the CDC reported 27,500
cases of pertussis. This increased number of identifiable cases may be due to improved awareness and
improved diagnostic methods, such as nucleic acid-based testing.
Klebsiella spp. Rhinoscleroma is a rare form of chronic, granulomatous infection of the nasal passages,
including the sinuses and occasionally the pharynx and larynx. Associated with Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis and
Klebsiella ozaenae, the disease is characterized by nasal obstruction
appearing over a long period, caused by tumor-like growth with local extension. K. ozaenae may contribute to
another infrequent condition called ozena, characterized by a chronic, mucopurulent nasal discharge that is
often foul smelling. It is caused by secondary, low-grade anaerobic infection.
ORAL CAVITY: Stomatitis is an inflammation of the mucous membranes of the oral cavity. Herpes simplex
virus is the primary agent of this disease, in which multiple ulcerative lesions are seen on the oral mucosa.
These lesions are painful and can be found in the mouth and in the oropharynx. Herpetic infections of the oral
cavity are prevalent among immunosuppressed patients.
217
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
Thrush: Candida spp. can also invade the oral mucosa. Immunosuppressed patients, including very young
infants, may develop oral candidiasis, called thrush. Oral thrush can extend to produce pharyngitis or
esophagitis, a common finding in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and in other
immunosuppressed patients. Thrush is suspected if whitish patches of exudate on an area of inflammation are
observed on the buccal (cheek) mucosa, tongue, or oropharynx. Oral mucositis or pharyngitis in the
granulocytopenic patient may be caused by Enterobacteriaceae, S. aureus, or Candida spp. and is
manifested by erythema, sore throat, and possibly exudates or ulceration.
Diagnosis of upper respiratory tract infections:
Collection and transport of specimens:
Sterile swabs are suitable for collecting most upper respiratory tract microorganisms. Swabs for detection of
group A streptococci (Streptococcus pyogenes) are the only exception. Throat swabs are also adequate for
recovery of adenoviruses and herpes viruses, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Mycoplasma, Chlamydia, and
Candida spp. Recovery of C. diphtheriae is enhanced by culturing both the throat and nasopharynx.
Nasopharyngeal swabs are better suited for recovery of Bordetella pertussis, Neisseria spp., along with several
viruses including respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and the other viruses causing rhinitis.
nasopharyngeal secretions collected by either aspiration or washing
Direct visual examination or detection
A Gram stain of material obtained from upper respiratory secretions or lesions may not improve diagnosis.
Yeast-like cells can be identified, which are helpful in identifying thrush, and the characteristic pattern of
fusiform and spirochetes of Vincent’s angina may be visualized. Gram’s crystal violet (allowed to remain on
the slide for 1 minute before rinsing with tap water) and the Gram stain can be used to identify the spirilla and
fusiform bacilli of Vincent’s angina.
However, if crystal violet is used, the smear should be very thin because everything will be intensely Gram
positive, making a thick smear difficult to read. Additionally, spirilla and bacilli may be stained using a dilute
solution of carbol fuchsin.
For causes of pharyngitis, Gram stains are unreliable. Direct smears of exudate from membrane-like lesions
used to differentiate diphtheria from other causes are also not reliable or recommended.
Fungal elements, including yeast cells and pseudohyphae, may be visualized with a 10% potassium hydroxide
(KOH) preparation, calcofluor white fluorescent stain, or periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain.
Direct examination of material obtained from the nasopharynx of suspected cases of whooping cough using a
fluorescent antibody stain has been shown to yield some early positive results for detection of B. pertussis.
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع