More important is the increase in resistance to some antimicrobial agents, particularly the resistance to trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole seen in E. coli. Physicians distinguish UTIs from other diseases that have similar clinical presentations with use
of a small number of tests, none of which, if used individually, have adequate sensitivity and specificity. Among the diagnostic
tests, urinalysis is useful mainly for excluding bacteriuria. Urine culture may not be necessary as part of the evaluation of
outpatients with uncomplicated UTIs, but it is necessary for outpatients who have recurrent UTIs, experience treatment failures,
or have complicated UTIs, as well as for inpatients that develop UTIs.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections. It has been estimated that symptomatic UTIs
result in as many as 7 million visits to outpatient clinics, 1 million visits to emergency departments, and 100,000 hospitalizations
annually. UTIs have become the most common hospital-acquired infection, accounting for as many as 35% of nosocomial
infections, and they are the second most common cause of bacteremia in hospitalized patients.
UTIs are challenging, not only because of the large number of infections that occur each year, but also because the diagnosis of
UTI is not always straightforward. Physicians must distinguish UTI from other diseases that have a similar clinical presentation,
some UTIs are asymptomatic or present with atypical signs and symptoms, and the diagnosis of UTIs in neutropenic patients
(who do not typically have pyuria) may require different diagnostic criteria than those used for the general patient population.
Because of these factors, physicians frequently rely on a small number of imperfect laboratory tests to augment clinical
impressions; even when clinical diagnosis are unequivocal, physicians may order laboratory tests to identify the cause of the
infection and/or to provide isolates for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. It therefore comes as no surprise that the laboratory
examination of urine specimens accounts for a large part of the workload in many hospital-based laboratories.
In fact, in many clinical laboratories, urine cultures are the most common type of culture, accounting for 24%–40% of submitted
cultures; as many as 80% of these urine cultures are submitted from the outpatient setting.
Causes of UTIS
The etiological agents of community-acquired and hospital-acquired UTIs differ. Enteric bacteria (in particular, Escherichia coli)
have been and remain the most frequent cause of UTI, although there is some evidence that the percentage of UTIs caused by E.
coli is decreasing. In contrast, significant changes in the causes of nosocomial UTI have been reported since 1980; from 1980
through 1991, the percentage of UTIs caused by E. coli, Proteus species, and Pseudomonas species decreased, whereas the
percentage of UTIs caused by yeasts, group B streptococci, and Klebsiella pneumoniae increased.
165
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Dr. Mohammed Ayad
Different changes in the causative agents of UTI, with a decrease in the percentage of UTIs caused by Enterobacter species, but
with an increase in the percentage of UTIs caused by Acinetobacter species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Candida albicans is
the most common cause of funguria, followed by Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida krusei,
and other yeasts.
Specimen collection
Suprapubic aspiration is the best method to avoid contamination of specimens with bacteria in the distal urethra. This collection
method is used infrequently because it is not indicated clinically (except in rare circumstances), it is invasive and uncomfortable,
and it requires too much time and too many resources to be practical. Collection of urine by use of a single catheter (straight
catheter technique) is the next best technique for obtaining urine specimens with minimal contamination, but, again, it is not
indicated clinically for most patients because it is too labor intensive and costly for routine use and it is invasive.
It has added disadvantages, because the process of inserting a catheter through the urethra can introduce bacteria into the bladder
(and thereby cause UTI), and rare complications have been reported.
Most urine specimens are obtained from adult patients via the clean-catch midstream technique. This technique has the following
advantages: it is neither invasive nor uncomfortable, it is simple and inexpensive, it can be performed in almost any clinical
setting, there is no risk of introducing bacteria into the bladder by catheterization, and there is no risk of complications.
Colony counts from urine specimens collected by this method correlate reasonably well with those of specimens collected via
suprapubic aspiration or straight catheterization.
The obvious disadvantage of this technique is that the urine sample passes through the distal urethra and can become
contaminated with commensal bacteria. Simple procedures that have been developed to decrease the contamination rate include
cleansing of skin and mucous membranes adjacent to the urethral orifice before micturition, allowing the first part of the urine
stream to pass into the toilet, and collecting urine for culture from the midstream.
Although the clean-catch midstream method is accepted and used widely, the available evidence suggests that the cleansing
procedures may not decrease urine contamination rates significantly and, therefore, may be unnecessary as a routine. There may
be difficulties with proper collection of samples from elderly patients, as well as from those patients who have physical or other
types of impairments, which adds to the importance of collecting specimens properly to avoid contamination.
Correct processing and handling of urine specimens, as well as correct interpretation of test results, is dependent on the method
used to collect the specimen. It is, therefore, of obvious importance for clinicians to specify the method of collection on the test
requisition. Other information that should be included on the test requisition includes the date and time of specimen collection,
patient demographic information, and any clinically relevant information (e.g., whether the patient was treated with antimicrobial
agents or whether anatomic abnormalities, stones, or an indwelling urinary catheter were present).
Specimen transportation
Urine specimens must plated within 2 hours after collection and if plated after delayed for 24 hours then plated so the culture
results were compared to determine whether delays in plating resulted in an increase in colony counts. In each of the situation,
some of the cultures that were delayed showed increases in the number of colony forming units (CFU) per ml to >105 CFU/ml;
thereby leading to false-positive results.
166
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Dr. Mohammed Ayad
It should be noted that recent studies were performed for interpreting quantitative urine cultures which regarded colony counts of
102
-103 CFU/ml were used to define probable infection in specific patients. On the basis of these results, it is currently
recommended that urine specimens should be plated within 2 h after collection unless specimens have been refrigerated or kept in
a preservative.
Specimen processing
Routine urine cultures should be plated using calibrated loops for the semi-quantitative method. This method has the advantage of
providing information regarding the number of CFU/ml, also providing isolated colonies for identification and susceptibility
testing. The types of media used for routine cultures should be limited to blood agar and MacConkey's agar.
For urine specimens obtained from outpatients, it is not necessary to routinely inoculate a medium that is selective for grampositive bacteria, because nearly all UTIs in outpatients are caused by aerobic and facultative gram-negative bacteria.
Even in patient populations in which Staphylococcus saprophyticus is a common cause of UTIs, it is not necessary to use selective
media and urine specimens which obtained from hospitalized patients are likely to contain Enterococci, which have emerged as
the second most common cause of nosocomial infections.
Urine cultures should be incubated overnight at 35°C-37°C in ambient air before being read. There is no added benefit to
incubating routine urine cultures for 48 h, provided that specimens are incubated for a full 24 h and that urine specimens
containing <104
uropathogens or specimens from patients with suspected funguria are incubated for 48 hours.
Most pathogenic yeasts grow well on blood agar plates, so it is unnecessary to use selective fungal media for urine cultures, even
for samples obtained from patients with suspected funguria. Selective fungal media can be used in those rare instances in which
there is a high clinical probability that a UTI is caused by a more fastidious yeast or mold. Urine specimens obtained from patients
with suspected mycobacterial UTIs should be processed and plated to the appropriate mycobacterial media
Detection of bacteriuria by urine microscopy
Bacteriuria can be detected microscopically using Gram staining of uncentrifuged urine specimens, Gram staining of centrifuged
specimens, or direct observation of bacteria in urine specimens. Gram stain of uncentrifuged urine specimens is a simple method.
A volume of urine is applied to a glass microscope slide, allowed to air dry, stained with Gram stain, and examined
microscopically.
The performance characteristics of the test are not well-defined, because different criteria have been used to define a positive test
result. In one study, the test was found to be sensitive for the detection of ⩾105 CFU/ml but insensitive for the detection of lower
numbers of bacteria.
The urine Gram stain test has the important advantage of providing immediate information as to the nature of the infecting
bacterium or yeast and thereby guiding the physician in selecting empiric antimicrobial therapy. This is of importance in some
settings, but the Gram stain test has 3 disadvantages that limit its usefulness in most clinical settings:
1- It is an insensitive test, being reliably positive only if the concentration of bacteria in the urine is ⩾105 CFU/ml; infections
with bacterial concentrations of 102
-103 CFU/ml may not be detected by this test.
167
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Dr. Mohammed Ayad
2- The test is too labor intensive for it to be practical for most clinical microbiology laboratories to offer it on more than a select
basis.
3- Because it may not detect bacteria at concentrations of 102
-103 CFU/ml, it should not be used in the outpatient setting for
patients with uncomplicated UTIs.
Because of these limitations, its use should be limited to patients with cases of acute pyelonephritis, patients with invasive UTIs,
or other patients for whom it is important to have immediate information as to the nature of the infecting pathogen.
Detection of bacteriuria by nitrite test
Bacteriuria can be detected chemically when bacteria produce nitrite from nitrate. The biochemical reaction that is detected by the
nitrite test is associated with members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (the pathogens most commonly responsible for UTIs),
but the usefulness of the test is limited because nitrite production is not associated with urinary-tract pathogens such as S.
saprophyticus, Pseudomonas species, or Enterococci.
Another limitation to the test is that it requires testing a specimen of the first urine produced in the morning, as ⩾4 h are required
for bacteria to convert nitrate to nitrite at levels that are reliably detectable.
Detection of pyuria by urine microscopy
Pyuria can be detected and quantified microscopically by measuring the urinary leukocyte excretion rate, counting leukocytes
with a hemocytometer, counting leukocytes in urine specimens using Gram staining, or counting leukocytes in a centrifuged
specimen.
The advantages to urine microscopy are that leukocytes, leukocyte casts, and other cellular elements are observed directly. One
disadvantage to urine microscopy is that leukocytes deteriorate quickly in urine that is not fresh or that has not been adequately
preserved. Because of these disadvantages, urine microscopy should be limited to patients in whom pyelonephritis or other more
serious infections are suspected.
The most accurate microscopic method for quantitating pyuria is to measure the urinary leukocyte excretion rate. Patients with
symptomatic UTIs have urinary leukocyte excretion rates of ⩾400,000 leukocytes/hour. The test is impractical for clinical use,
however, making it necessary for laboratories to use other methods. A simple and inexpensive alternative is to count urine
leukocytes with a hemocytometer. Comparison of hemocytometer counts with urinary leukocyte excretion rates has shown that a
hemocytometer count of ⩾10 leukocytes/mm3
correlates with a urinary leukocyte excretion rate of ⩾400,000 leukocytes/h.
Moreover, the correlation of hemocytometer counts with urine colony counts has shown that patients with symptomatic UTIs and
bacterial concentrations of >105 CFU/ml have urine leukocyte counts of ⩾10 leukocytes/mm3
. Although using a hemocytometer
to count leukocytes is easier than measuring urinary leukocyte excretion rates, it is impractical for clinical laboratories to use a
hemocytometer to count leukocytes on a routine basis. The most practical microscopic method involves counting the number of
leukocytes in the sediment of centrifuged urine specimens; this method is inaccurate because of inadequate standardization of the
method. For these reasons, and to facilitate the processing of large numbers of specimens, most laboratories use rapid tests for
leukocyte esterase as a surrogate for microscopic leukocyte counts.
Detection of pyuria by leukocyte esterase tests
168
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Dr. Mohammed Ayad
Leukocyte esterase tests are based on the hydrolysis of ester substrates by proteins with esterolytic activity; human neutrophils
produce as many as 10 proteins with esterolytic activity. These proteins react with ester substrates to produce alcohols and acids
that then react with other chemicals to produce a color change that is proportional to the amount of esterase in the specimen.
These tests have the advantage of detecting both esterases in intact leukocytes and esterases released after cell lysis; therefore,
even specimens that have not been preserved properly may yield a positive test result.
Leukocyte esterase tests can yield false-positive test results when the urine is contaminated with bacteria present in vaginal fluid;
when the specimen contains eosinophils or Trichomonas species, both of which can act as sources of esterases; and when
oxidizing agents or formalin react with the test strips to generate false-positive test results.
Leukocyte esterase tests may show a decrease in positive test results when the specimen has an elevated specific gravity and/or
elevated levels of protein and glucose; when boric acid preservatives are present; when large amounts of ascorbic or oxalic acid
are present; and when the patient has received antimicrobial agents, such as Cephalothin, Cephalexin, or Tetracycline.
Routine bacterial urine cultures
Urine culture may not be necessary as part of the evaluation of outpatients with uncomplicated UTIs. However, urine cultures are
necessary for outpatients who have recurrent UTIs, experience treatment failures, or have complicated UTIs.
Urine cultures are also necessary for inpatients that develop UTIs. The bacterial culture remains an important test in the diagnosis
of UTI, not only because it helps to document infection, but also because it is necessary for determination of the identity of the
infecting microorganism(s) and for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. This is particularly true because of the increased incidence
of antimicrobial resistance.
The most commonly used criterion for defining significant bacteriuria is the presence of ⩾105 CFU per milliliter of urine. This
criterion was established only for women with acute pyelonephritis or women who were asymptomatic but had multiple urine
cultures that yielded this number of bacteria; however, the criterion is often applied to other patient populations. Most patients
with UTIs, however, do not fall into either category, and 30%-50% of patients with acute urethral syndrome will have colony
counts of <105 CFU/ml. For this reason, many laboratories have opted to use lower colony counts as a criterion for interpreting
and reporting results. One common criterion is a colony count of 104 CFU/ml, which would be expected to increase the sensitivity
of the test without making the test impractical for clinicians and laboratories to use.
Catheterized patients (who may have low concentrations of bacteria that can progress to higher concentrations) and many patients
with infections of the lower urinary tract have colony counts much lower than 105 CFU/ml if the specimens are obtained via
suprapubic aspirate or catheterization. Accordingly, the most appropriate diagnostic criterion for urine culture specimens obtained
via suprapubic aspirate or catheterization is a bacterial concentration of ⩾102 CFU/ml.
Follow-up cultures are recommended for patients with infections that do not respond to therapy, patients who have recurrent
UTIs, patients who have anatomic or functional abnormalities of the urinary tract, or patients who continue to have unexplained
abnormal urinalysis findings.
Interpretation of urine culture results
169
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Dr. Mohammed Ayad
Microbiologists need to interpret the microbiologic relevance of growth on culture plates to determine whether further
identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are necessary. Most culture results can be interpreted readily; no growth and
gross contamination are both unambiguous results, as are pure cultures of common pathogens growing in a quantity of >105 CFU
per milliliter of urine.
The interpretation of cultures that yield pure growth in lower quantities is also clear for specimens obtained via suprapubic
aspiration or straight catheterization. On the other hand, interpretation of urine cultures that yield mixed flora in varying quantities
can be difficult. Test reports for cultures that yield mixed flora in varying quantities should specify the microorganisms that were
recovered, the quantity of each microorganism, and the probable clinical importance of each isolate.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Each laboratory should have guidelines by which pathogens are tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. These guidelines should be
developed and antimicrobial susceptibility tests should be performed and reported according to the most recent version of the
NCCLS guidelines. Bacterial or fungal isolates of uncertain clinical importance should not be tested for antimicrobial
susceptibility for purposes of routine patient care
Most patients with uncomplicated acute cystitis have cases that are clinically straightforward, and they may not require any
laboratory testing beyond urinalysis. For a significant number of patients, however, the clinical history and physical findings
alone may be insufficient to make a definitive diagnosis of UTI.
For those patients and for patients with complicated UTIs, laboratory tests are necessary to make the diagnosis and to provide
specific information regarding the identity and the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of pathogens. Both the laboratory diagnosis
and the clinical diagnosis of laboratory test results must be made in light of the method of collection used; clinicians should
specify the method of collection on test requisition forms.
Of the available laboratory tests, urinalysis is helpful primarily as a means of excluding bacteriuria, but it is not a surrogate for
culture. Although cultures identify pathogens, the accurate interpretation of culture results requires clinical information that is
usually available only to the clinician.
170
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
Bloodstream Infections :
Invasion of the bloodstream by microorganisms constitutes one of the most serious situations in
infectious disease. Microorganisms present in the circulating blood—whether continuously, intermittently, or
transiently—are a threat to every organ in the body.
The suffix emia is derived from the Greek word meaning “blood” and refers to the presence of a substance in
the blood; bacteremia refers to the presence of bacteria in the blood, fungemia refers to the presence of fungi
in the bloodstream, and septicemia indicates bacteria are present in the blood, producing an infection and
reproducing within the bloodstream.
Microbial invasion of the bloodstream resulting from any organism can have serious immediate
consequences, including shock, multiple organ failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and death.
Approximately 200,000 cases of bacteremia and fungemia occur annually, with mortality
rates ranging from 20% to 50%. Timely detection and identification of blood-borne pathogens are two of the
most important functions of the microbiology laboratory.
Pathogens of all four major groups of microbes—bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites—may be found
circulating in blood during the course of many diseases. Positive blood cultures may help provide a clinical
diagnosis, as well as a specific etiologic diagnosis.
General considerations:
The successful recovery of microorganisms from blood by the laboratory depends on many, often complex,
factors: the type of bacteremia, the specimen collection method, the blood volume, the number and timing of
blood cultures, the interpretation of results, and the type of patient population being served by the laboratory.
All of these parameters must be considered in the development of the blood culture protocol within the
laboratory in order to maximize the detection and recovery of microorganisms and ensure quality patient care.
Etiology:
As previously mentioned, all major groups of microbes can be present in the bloodstream during the course of
many diseases.
Bacteria:
The organisms most commonly isolated from blood are gram-positive cocci, including coagulase-negative
staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus spp., and other organisms likely to be inhabitants of
the hospital environment that colonize the skin, oropharynx, and gastrointestinal tract of patients. Some of the
most common, clinically significant bacteria isolated from
blood cultures are listed in Table 1. (Table 1 Organisms Commonly Isolated from Blood Cultures)
Organisms Commonly Isolated from Blood Cultures:
Staphylococcus aureus
Escherichia coli
Coagulase-negative staphylococci
Enterococcus spp.
171
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
Candida albicans
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Viridans streptococci
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Enterobacter cloacae
Proteus spp.
Beta-hemolytic streptococci
Anaerobic bacteria: Bacteroides and Clostridium spp.
In general, the number of fungi and coagulase-negative staphylococc has increased, whereas the number of
clinically significant anaerobic isolates has decreased since the early 2000s.
Of importance, the laboratory isolation of certain bacterial species from blood can indicate the presence of an
underlying, occult, or undiagnosed neoplasm. Alterations in local conditions at the site of the neoplasm
allowing bacteria to proliferate and seed the bloodstream have been suggested as a potential mechanism for the
association between bacteremia and cancer. Another possible mechanism is reduced killing of bacterial cells by
the host phagocytes. Organisms associated with neoplastic disease include Clostridium septicum and other
uncommonly isolated clostridial species, Streptococcus galldyticus, Aeromonas hydrophila, Plesiomonas
shigelloides, and Campylobacter spp. Finally, if Streptococcus anginosis group bacteria are isolated from
blood, the possibility of an abscess should be considered.
Fungi:
Fungemia (the presence of fungi in blood) is usually a serious condition, occurring primarily in
immunosuppressed patients and in those with serious or terminal illness. Candida albicans is by far the most
common species, but Malassezia furfur can often be isolated in patients, particularly neonates, receiving lipidsupplemented parenteral nutrition. Candida spp. account for approximately 8% to 10% of all nosocomial
bloodstream infections. Except for Histoplasma, which multiply in leukocytes
(white blood cells), fungi do not invade blood cells, but their presence in the blood usually indicates a focus of
infection elsewhere in the body.
Fungi in the bloodstream can disseminate (be carried) to all organs of the host, where they may grow, invade
normal tissue, and produce toxic products. Fungi gain entrance to the circulatory system via loss of integrity of
the gastrointestinal or other mucosa; through damaged skin; from primary sites of infection, such as the lung or
other organs; or by means of intravascular catheters. Systemic fungal infections begin as pneumonia and may
disseminate from the lungs, which serve as the portal of entry. Arthroconidia of Coccidioides immitis and
microconidia of Histoplasma capsulatum and Blastomyces dermatitidis are ingested by alveolar macrophages
in the lung.
These macrophages carry the fungi to nearby lymph nodes, usually the hilar nodes. The fungi multiply within
the node tissue and ultimately are released into the circulating blood, from which they are capable of seeding
172
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
other organs or are destroyed by the body’s defenses. Molds are particularly insensitive to host defenses such as
antibody and phagocytic cells because of their large size and their sterol containing cell wall structure.
Parasites:
Eukaryotic parasites may be found transiently in the bloodstream as they migrate to other tissues or organs.
Their presence, however, cannot be considered consistent with a state of good health. For example, tachyzoites
of the parasite Toxoplasma gondii may be found in circulating blood. They invade cells within lymph nodes
and other organs, including the lungs, liver, heart, brain, and eyes. The resulting cellular destruction accounts
for the manifestations of toxoplasmosis. Also, microfilariae are
seen in peripheral blood during infection with Dipetalonema, Mansonella, Loa loa, Wuchereria, or Brugia.
Malarial parasites invade host erythrocytes and hepatic parenchymal cells. The significant anemia and
subsequent tissue hypoxia (reduction in oxygen levels) may result from destruction of red blood cells by the
parasite. Vascular trapping of normal erythrocytes by the infected red blood cells, which are less flexible and
tend to clog small capillaries, is a major cause of morbidity. The host’s immunologic response is to remove the
parasites and damaged red blood cells; the immune response may also
have deleterious effects. Parasites in the bloodstream are usually detected by direct visualization. Those
parasites for which traditional diagnosis is dependent on observation of the organism
in peripheral blood smears include Plasmodium, Trypanosoma, and Babesia. Patients with malaria or filariasis
may display a periodicity in their episodes of fever that allows the physician to time the collection of blood for
microscopic examination intended for optimal detection. Rapid serological methods and molecular methods are
currently used to detect malaria, babesiosis, and trypanosomiasis.
Viruses:
Although many viruses do circulate in the peripheral blood at some stage of disease, the primary pathology
relates to infection of the target organ or cells. Those viruses that preferentially infect blood cells are EpsteinBarr virus (invades lymphocytes), cytomegalovirus (invades monocytes, polymorphonuclear cells, and
lymphocytes), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
(involves only certain T lymphocytes and perhaps macrophages) and other human retroviruses that attack
lymphocytes. The pathogenesis of viral diseases of the blood is the same as that for viral diseases of any organ;
by diverting the cellular machinery to create new viral components
or by other means, the virus may prevent the host cell from performing its normal function. The cell
may be destroyed or damaged by viral replication, and immunologic responses of the host may also contribute
to the pathogenesis. Although many viral diseases have a viremic stage,
recovery of virus particles or detection of circulating viruses is used in the diagnosis of only a few diseases.
Types of bacteremia:
Bacteremia may be transient, continuous, or intermittent. Most people have experienced transient bacteremia;
teething infants and people having dental procedures have had oral flora gain entry to the bloodstream through
breaks in the gums. Other conditions in which bacteria are only transiently present in the bloodstream include
manipulation of infected tissues, devices or instrumentation inserted through contaminated mucosal surfaces,
173
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
and surgery involving nonsterile sites. These circumstances may also lead to significant septicemia, although
normally the bacteria are cleared from the blood by scavenging
leukocytes, resulting in no infection. Septicemia can occur when the bacteria multiply more rapidly than the
immune system is capable of killing and removing the organism. In septic shock, bacterial endocarditis, and
other endovascular infections, organisms are released into the bloodstream at a fairly constant rate (continuous
bacteremia). Also, during the early stages of specific infections, including typhoid fever, brucellosis, and
leptospirosis, bacteria are continuously present in the bloodstream.
In most other infections, such as in patients with undrained abscesses, bacteria can be found intermittently in
the bloodstream. Of note, the causative agents of meningitis, pneumonia, pyogenic arthritis, and osteomyelitis
are often recovered from blood during the early course of these diseases. In the case of transient seeding of the
blood from a sequestered focus of infection, such as an
abscess, bacteria are released into the blood approximately 45 minutes before a febrile episode.
The symptoms of septicemia are fever, chills, and malaise; these are caused by the presence of the invading
microorganism and the toxins produced by these microorganisms. The older the patient is, the greater the risk
and the rate of mortality as a result of septicemia.
Types of blood stream infections:
The two major categories of bloodstream infections are intravascular (those that originate within the
cardiovascular system) and extravascular (those that result from bacteria entering the blood circulation through
the lymphatic system from another site of infection). Of note, other organisms, such as fungi, may also cause
intravascular or extravascular infections. However, because bacteria account for the majority of significant
vascular infections, these types of bloodstream infections are discussed in more detail. Factors contributing to
the initiation of bloodstream infections are immunosuppressive agents, widespread use of broad-spectrum
antibiotics that suppress the normal flora and allow the emergence
of resistant strains of bacteria, invasive procedures allowing bacteria access to the interior of the host, more
extensive surgical procedures, and prolonged survival of debilitated and seriously ill patients.
1) Intravascular Infections:
Intravascular infections include infective endocarditis, mycotic aneurysm, suppurative thrombophlebitis, and
intravenous (IV), catheter-associated bacteremia. Because these infections are within the vascular system,
organisms are present in the bloodstream at a fairly constant rate (i.e., a continuous bacteremia). These
infections in the cardiovascular system are extremely serious and considered life threatening.
Infective Endocarditis. The development of infective endocarditis (infection of the endocardium most
commonly caused by bacteria) is believed to involve several independent events. Cardiac abnormalities, such as
congenital valvular diseases that lead to turbulence in blood flow or direct trauma from IV catheters, can
damage cardiac endothelium. This damage to the endothelial
surface results in the deposition of platelets and fibrin. If bacteria transiently gain access to the bloodstream
(this can occur after an innocuous procedure such as brushing the teeth) after alteration of the capillary
endothelial cells, the organisms may stick to and then colonize the damaged cardiac endothelial cell surface.
174
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
After colonization, the surface will rapidly be covered with a protective layer of fibrin and platelets. This
protective environment is favorable to further bacterial multiplication. This web of platelets, fibrin,
inflammatory cells, and entrapped organisms is called a vegetation (Figure -1).
The resulting vegetations ultimately seed bacteria into the blood at a slow but constant rate. The primary
causes of infective endocarditis are the viridans streptococci, comprising several species (Box 68-2). These
organisms are normal inhabitants of the oral cavity, often gaining entrance to the bloodstream as a result of
gingivitis, periodontitis, or dental manipulation. Heart valves, especially those previously damaged, present
convenient surfaces for attachment of these bacteria. Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus mutans are
frequently isolated in streptococcal endocarditis.
Gram-negative bacilli, known as the AACEK group, Aggregatibacter aphrophilus, Actinobacillus
actinomycetemcomitans Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingellakingae, can also be
associated with endocarditis.
With the ever-increasing use of IV catheters, arterial lines, and vascular prostheses, organisms considered
normal or hospital-acquired inhabitants of the human skin are able to gain access to the bloodstream and attach
to various surfaces, including heart valves and vascular endothelium. It has been estimated that more than
200,000 nosocomial infections (bloodstream) occur annually in the United States in adults and children. The
majority of these infections are caused by the use of intravascular catheters. Staphylococcus epidermidis and
other coagulase-negative staphylococci have been increasingly implicated as the cause of infection associated
with intravascular catheters. S. epidermidis is the most common etiologic agent identified in prosthetic valve
endocarditis, with S. aureus being the second most common. S. aureus is an important cause of septicemia
without endocarditis and is found in association with other foci, such as abscesses, wound infections, and
pneumonia, as well as sepsis related to indwelling intravascular catheters.
Figure 1 Vegetations of bacterial endocarditis. Arrow indicates the vegetations.
(Courtesy Celeste N. Powers, MD, PhD, Virginia Commonwealth
University Medical Center, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Richmond, Va.
175
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
Table 2 Agents of Infective Endocarditis
Agents of Infective Endocarditis:
Aggregatibacter aprophilus
Viridans streptococci*
Nutritionally deficient streptococci (Abiotrophia spp. and
Granulicatella spp.)
Enterococci*
Streptococcus bovis
Staphylococcus aureus*
Staphylococci (coagulase-negative)
Enterobacteriaceae
Pseudomonas spp. (usually in drug users)
Haemophilus spp.
Unusual gram-negative bacilli (e.g., Actinobacillus,
Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, Coxiella burnetii)
Yeast
Other (including polymicrobial infectious endocarditis)
*Most common organisms associated with native valve endocarditis in non-drug-using
adults.
Table -3 Common Agents of IV Catheter–Associated Bacteremia:
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Other coagulase-negative staphylococci
Staphylococcus aureus
Enterobacteriaceae
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Figure 2 Short-term, triple-lumen central venous catheter. The ends from which the catheter is accessed
are usually referred to as the hubs. After the catheter is inserted, the tip resides within the bloodstream.
176
Arranged by Sarah Mohssen
Section I– Microbiology By Nada Sajet
Candida spp.
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع