ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Central venous access devices (CVADs) have been commonly employed during various courses of anticancer treatment. Currently, there are a few types of clinically available CVADs, which are associated with short-term and long-term complications. However, little is known about the complication rates when CVADs are used only in palliative care settings. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all the published literature to evaluate the complication rates of CVADs in this clinical setting. (2) Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to identify publications from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and trial registries. Publications reporting the complication rates of PICCs, central lines, and PORTs in palliative settings for terminally ill cancer patients were included, while those on the use of systemic anticancer therapy and peripheral venous catheters were excluded. The outcome measures included overall complication rate, rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and rate of thromboembolism (TE). This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023404489). (3) Results: Five publications with 327 patients were analyzed, including four studies on PICCs and one study on central lines. No studies on PORTs were eligible for analysis. The overall complication rate for PICCs (pooled estimate 7.02%, 95% CI 0.27-19.10) was higher than that for central lines (1.44%, 95% CI 0.30-4.14, p = 0.002). The risk of CRBSI with PICCs (2.03%, 95% CI 0.00-9.62) was also higher than that with central lines (0.96%, 95% CI 0.12-3.41, p = 0.046). PICCs also had a trend of a higher risk of TE (2.10%, 95% CI 0.00-12.22) compared to central lines (0.48%, 95% CI 0.01-2.64, p = 0.061). (4) Conclusions: PICCs for palliative cancer care were found to have greater complications than central lines. This might aid in the formulation of future recommendation guidelines on the choice of CVAD in this setting.

PMID:37835406 | PMC:PMC10571956 | DOI:10.3390/cancers15194712

19:08

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Impact of mild thrombocytopenia on bleeding and recurrent thrombosis in cancer

Haematologica. 2023 Oct 19:0. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.284192. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Thrombocytopenia occurs frequently in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), however prospective evaluation of clinical outcomes following randomization to anticoagulants is limited. The HOKUSAI VTE Cancer study was a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority, phase III trial comparing dalteparin with edoxaban in CAT patients. This post hoc analysis of Hokusai VTE Cancer Study was performed to compare outcomes in patients with platelet count ≤100 K/μL at one or more specified time points (baseline, 1-month, or 3-month) versus those without thrombocytopenia. Cumulative incidences at 180 days were calculated with death as a competing risk. The primary outcome was major bleeding; secondary outcomes were clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), recurrent thrombosis, and survival. The analysis included 1,045 patients with primarily solid tumor malignancies (89%), median age 65 years, and 52% male. The thrombocytopenia group comprised 9.6% (N=101) of the cohort and relative to the non-thrombocytopenia cohort (N=944), experienced significantly higher major bleeding (9.0% vs. 4.0%, sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR) 2.4, P=0.02) and CRNMB (17.9% vs. 9.6%, SHR 2.0, P=0.01). Thrombocytopenia did not impact recurrent VTE (9.8% vs. 7.4%, SHR 1.3, P=0.37) nor overall mortality (21.8% vs. 26.0%, HR 0.9, P=0.48). Major bleeding was higher in patients with thrombocytopenia and gastrointestinal malignancies receiving edoxaban versus dalteparin (16.8% vs 0, p.

PMID:37855029 | DOI:10.3324/haematol.2023.284192

19:08

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Enoxaparin for the long-term therapy of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal insufficiency

Thromb Haemost. 2023 Oct 13. doi: 10.1055/a-2191-7510. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal therapy of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients with renal insufficiency (RI) is unknown. Current guidelines recommend to use low-molecular-weight heparin over direct oral anticoagulants to treat VTE in cancer patients at high-risk for bleeding.

METHODS: We used the RIETE registry to compare the 6-month incidence rates of: 1) VTE recurrences vs. major bleeding; and 2) fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) vs. fatal bleeding in 3 subgroups (those with mild, moderate, or severe RI) of cancer patients receiving enoxaparin monotherapy.

RESULTS: From January 2009 through June 2022, 2,844 patients with RI received enoxaparin for ≥6 months: 1,432 (50%) had mild, 1,168 (41%) moderate, and 244 (8.6%) had severe RI. Overall, 68%, 62% and 12% respectively, received the recommended doses. Among patients with mild RI, the rates of VTE recurrences vs. major bleeding (4.6% vs. 5.4%) and fatal PE vs. fatal bleeding (1.3% vs. 1.2%) were similar. Among patients with moderate RI, VTE recurrences were half as common as major bleeding (3.1% vs. 6.3%), but fatal PE and fatal bleeding were close (1.8% vs. 1.2%). Among patients with severe RI, VTE recurrences were 3-fold less common than major bleeding (4.1% vs. 13%), but fatal PE was 3-fold more frequent than fatal bleeding (2.5% vs. 0.8%). During the first 10 days, fatal PE was 5-fold more common than fatal bleeding (2.1% vs. 0.4%).

CONCLUSIONS: Among cancer patients with severe RI, fatal PE was 5-fold more common than fatal bleeding. The recommended doses of enoxaparin in these patients should be revisited.

PMID:37832588 | DOI:10.1055/a-2191-7510

19:08

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban to Prevent Recurrences of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer: A Real-Life Experience with a Focus on Female Patients

J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 9;12(19):6427. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196427.