ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Limited data exist on the risk of venous and arterial thromboembolisms (VTE and ATE) in patients receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy. We aimed to determine the thromboembolic risk of patients with recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone.

METHODS: This population-based study used nationwide claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of South Korea from 2013 to 2020. Patients with recurrent/metastatic CRC treated with first-line oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based doublets with or without cetuximab and no secondary prevention for VTE and ATE were included. Primary outcomes were the occurrence of any thromboembolic events, VTE, and ATE, which were determined using the cumulative incidence method incorporating death as a competing event.

RESULTS: We identified 19,723 patients (cetuximab plus chemotherapy, N = 7630; chemotherapy alone, N = 12,093). The cumulative incidence of any thromboembolic events in patients with cetuximab plus chemotherapy was significantly higher than in those receiving chemotherapy alone (6-month, 5.62 % vs. 3.58 %, P < 0.0001). The rates of VTE (6-month, 5.11 % vs. 3.28 %, P < 0.0001) and ATE (6-month, 0.53 % vs. 0.32 %, P = 0.0218) were also higher in patients receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy. In multivariable analysis, cetuximab plus chemotherapy was independently associated with developing any thromboembolic events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.42-1.87), VTE (HR, 1.62; 95 % CI, 1.40-1.87), and ATE (HR, 1.77; 95 % CI, 1.16-2.71).

CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab with irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based doublet chemotherapy was associated with an increased risk of any thromboembolic events, VTE, and ATE; further studies are warranted to examine the underlying mechanisms.

PMID:37804738 | DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.10.005

19:08

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Risk of Thrombosis and Bleeding in Gynecologic Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct 10:S0002-9378(23)00735-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.006. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide procedure-specific estimates of the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding, in the absence of thromboprophylaxis, following gynecologic cancer surgery.

DATA SOURCES: We conducted comprehensive searches on Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for observational studies. We also reviewed reference lists of eligible studies and review articles. We performed separate searches for randomized trials addressing effects of thromboprophylaxis and conducted a web-based survey on thromboprophylaxis practice.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies enrolling ≥50 adult patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery procedures reporting absolute incidence for at least one of the following: symptomatic pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic VTE, bleeding requiring reintervention (including re-exploration and angioembolization), bleeding leading to transfusion or post-operative hemoglobin <70

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility, performed data extraction, and evaluated risk of bias of eligible articles. We adjusted the reported estimates for thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up and used the median value from studies to determine cumulative incidence at 4 weeks post-surgery stratified by patient VTE risk factors, and used the GRADE approach to rate evidence certainty.

RESULTS: We included 188 studies (398,167 patients) reporting on 37 gynecologic cancer surgery procedures. The evidence certainty was generally low to very low. Median symptomatic VTE risk (in the absence of prophylaxis) was <1%2.0% in 13 of 37 (35%). The risks of VTE varied from 0.1% in low VTE risk patients undergoing cervical conization to 33.5% in high VTE risk patients undergoing pelvic exenteration. Estimates of bleeding requiring reintervention varied from <0.1%<1%

CONCLUSIONS: VTE reduction with thromboprophylaxis likely outweighs increase in bleeding requiring reintervention in many gynecologic cancer procedures (e.g., open surgery for ovarian cancer and pelvic exenteration). In some procedures (e.g., laparoscopic total hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy), thromboembolism and bleeding risks are similar, and decisions depend on individual risk prediction and values and preferences regarding VTE and bleeding.

PMID:37827272 | DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.006

19:08

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

An etiological assessment of a deep vein thrombosis led to the discovery of a renal tumor collision: Case report

Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Oct;111:108922. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108922. Epub 2023 Oct 5.