ABSTRACT

Cardiotoxicity is a severe side effect of the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin (DOX). We recently showed that DOX-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis and death were attenuated through autophagy pre-induction. Herein, we assessed how the autophagy/mitophagy-inducing antitumor drug everolimus (EVL) affected DOX-induced cytotoxicity in the rat cardiomyocyte cell line H9c2 and human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Apoptosis was assessed using annexin V assay. Autophagy and mitophagy were assessed using fluorescence assays. Cellular protein levels were determined using western blotting. Pretreatment with EVL (1 nM) before DOX exposure inhibited mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity, induced autophagy and mitophagy, and activated protein kinase B (AKT) in H9c2 cells. In mitochondria, DOX (1 μM) induced structural damage (decreased membrane potential and release of cytochrome c), increased superoxide levels, decreased apoptosis inhibitor Bcl-2, and increased apoptosis inducer Bax, leading to apoptosis and reduced viability in H9c2 cells. EVL pretreatment suppressed DOX-induced changes. EVL anti-apoptotic effects were inhibited by treatment with MK-2206, a selective AKT inhibitor. Furthermore, EVL suppressed DOX-induced cardiotoxicity through autophagy/mitophagy and AKT activation but did not attenuate DOX-induced apoptosis or reduction in viability in MCF-7 cells. Altogether, EVL can protect cardiomyocytes from DOX-induced apoptosis and toxicity without reducing DOX antitumor effects, allowing safer chemotherapy.

PMID:37739323 | DOI:10.1016/j.tiv.2023.105698

09:55

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Artificial intelligence in the prediction of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and pooled analysis

Eur J Haematol. 2023 Oct 4. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14110. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnostic and prognostic predictions of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are crucial for VTE management. Artificial intelligence (AI) enables autonomous identification of the most predictive patterns from large complex data. Although evidence regarding its performance in VTE prediction is emerging, a comprehensive analysis of performance is lacking.

AIMS: To systematically review the performance of AI in the diagnosis and prediction of VTE and compare it to clinical risk assessment models (RAMs) or logistic regression models.

METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception to April 20, 2021. Search terms included "artificial intelligence" and "venous thromboembolism." Eligible criteria were original studies evaluating AI in the prediction of VTE in adults and reporting one of the following outcomes: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, or area under receiver operating curve (AUC). Risks of bias were assessed using the PROBAST tool. Unpaired t-test was performed to compare the mean AUC from AI versus conventional methods (RAMs or logistic regression models).

RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included. Number of participants ranged from 31 to 111 888. The AI-based models included artificial neural network (six studies), support vector machines (four studies), Bayesian methods (one study), super learner ensemble (one study), genetic programming (one study), unspecified machine learning models (two studies), and multiple machine learning models (five studies). Twelve studies (60%) had both training and testing cohorts. Among 14 studies (70%) where AUCs were reported, the mean AUC for AI versus conventional methods were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.85) versus 0.61 (95% CI: 0.54-0.68), respectively (p < .001). However, the good to excellent discriminative performance of AI methods is unlikely to be replicated when used in clinical practice, because most studies had high risk of bias due to missing data handling and outcome determination.

CONCLUSION: The use of AI appears to improve the accuracy of diagnostic and prognostic prediction of VTE over conventional risk models; however, there was a high risk of bias observed across studies. Future studies should focus on transparent reporting, external validation, and clinical application of these models.

PMID:37794526 | DOI:10.1111/ejh.14110

09:55

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Monocyte recruitment in venous pulmonary embolism at time of cancer diagnosis in upper gastrointestinal cancer patients

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Oct 4. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02897-5. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Upper gastrointestinal cancer is frequently complicated by venous thromboembolisms (VTE), especially pulmonary embolisms (PE) increase the mortality rate. Monocytes are a part of the innate immune system and up-regulation may indicate an ongoing inflammatory response or infectious disease and has lately been associated with a moderate risk of suffering from VTE. This prospectively study aims to compare the incidence of pulmonary embolism with markers of coagulation and compare it to the absolute monocyte count. A consecutive cohort of 250 patients with biopsy proven upper gastrointestinal cancer (i.e. pancreas, biliary tract, esophagus and gastric cancer) where included at the time of cancer diagnosis and before treatment. All patients underwent bilateral compression ultrasonography for detection of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Of these 143 had an additionally pulmonary angiografi (CTPA) with the staging computer tomography. 13 of 250 patients (5.2%) had a DVT and 11 of 143 (7.7%) had CTPA proven PE. PE was significantly more common among patients with elevated D-dimer (OR 11.62, 95%CI: 1.13-119, P = 0.039) and elevated absolute monocyte count (OR 7.59, 95%CI: 1.37-41.98, P = 0.020). Only patients with pancreatic cancer had a significantly higher risk of DVT (OR 11.03, 95%CI: 1.25-97.43, P = 0.031). The sensitivity of absolute monocyte count was 63.6 (95%CI: 30.8-89.1) and specificity 80.3 (95%CI: 72.5-86.7), with a negative predictive value of 96.4 (95%CI: 91-99) in PE. An increased absolute monocyte count was detected in patients suffering from PE but not DVT, suggesting a possible interaction with the innate immune system.

PMID:37792208 | DOI:10.1007/s11239-023-02897-5

09:55

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Surgery As a Trigger for Incident Venous Thromboembolism: Results from a Population-Based Case-Crossover Study

TH Open. 2023 Sep 20;7(3):e244-e250. doi: 10.1055/a-2159-9957. eCollection 2023 Jul.

ABSTRACT

Background Surgery is a major transient risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the impact of major surgery as a VTE trigger has been scarcely investigated using a case-crossover design. Aim To investigate the role of major surgery as a trigger for incident VTE in a population-based case-crossover study while adjusting for other concomitant VTE triggers. Methods We conducted a case-crossover study with 531 cancer-free VTE cases derived from the Tromsø Study cohort. Triggers were registered during the 90 days before a VTE event (hazard period) and in four preceding 90-day control periods. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for VTE according to major surgery and after adjustment for other VTE triggers. Results Surgery was registered in 85 of the 531 (16.0%) hazard periods and in 38 of the 2,124 (1.8%) control periods, yielding an OR for VTE of 11.40 (95% CI: 7.42-17.51). The OR decreased to 4.10 (95% CI: 2.40-6.94) after adjustment for immobilization and infection and was further attenuated to 3.31 (95% CI: 1.83-5.96) when additionally adjusted for trauma, blood transfusion, and central venous catheter. In a mediation analysis, 51.4% (95% CI: 35.5-79.7%) of the effect of surgery on VTE risk could be mediated through immobilization and infection. Conclusions Major surgery was a trigger for VTE, but the association between surgery and VTE risk was in part explained by other VTE triggers often coexisting with surgery, particularly immobilization and infection.

PMID:37736074 | PMC:PMC10511275 | DOI:10.1055/a-2159-9957

09:55

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Trimodality therapy versus perioperative chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction (Neo-AEGIS): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Sep 18:S2468-1253(23)00243-1. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00243-1. Online ahead of print. ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimum curative approach to adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction is unknown. We aimed to compare trimodality therapy (preoperative radiotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel [CROSS regimen]) with optimum contemporaneous perioperative chemotherapy regimens (epirubicin plus cisplatin or oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil or capecitabine [a modified MAGIC regimen] before 2018 and fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel [FLOT] subsequently).

METHODS: Neo-AEGIS (CTRIAL-IE 10-14) was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 24 centres in Europe. Patients aged 18 years or older with clinical tumour stage T2-3, nodal stage N0-3, and M0 adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction were randomly assigned to perioperative chemotherapy (three preoperative and three postoperative 3-week cycles of intravenous 50 mg/m2 epirubicin on day 1 plus intravenous 60 mg/m2 cisplatin or intravenous 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1 plus continuous infusion of 200 mg/m2 fluorouracil daily or oral 625 mg/m2 capecitabine twice daily up to 2018, with four preoperative and four postoperative 2-week cycles of 2600 mg/m2 fluorouracil, 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin, 200 mg/m2 leucovorin, and 50 mg/m2 docetaxel intravenously on day 1 as an option from 2018) or trimodality therapy (41·4 Gy in 23 fractions on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, 22-26, and 29-31 with intravenous area under the curve 2 mg/mL per min carboplatin plus intravenous 50 mg/m2 paclitaxel on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29). The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug, regardless of which study drug they received, by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival, site of treatment failure, operative complications, toxicity, pathological response (complete [ypT0N0] and major [tumour regression grade 1 and 2]), margin-free resection (R0), and health-related quality of life. Toxicity and safety data were analysed in the safety population, defined as patients who took at least one dose of study drug, according to treatment actually received. The initial power calculation was based on superiority of trimodality therapy (n=366 patients); it was adjusted after FLOT became an option to a non-inferiority design with a margin of 5% for perioperative chemotherapy (n=540). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01726452.

FINDINGS: Between Jan 24, 2013, and Dec 23, 2020, 377 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 362 were included in the intention-to treat population (327 [90%] male and 360 [99%] White): 184 in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 178 in the trimodality therapy group. The trial closed prematurely in December, 2020, after the second interim futility analysis (143 deaths), on the basis of similar survival metrics and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. At a median follow-up of 38·8 months (IQR 16·3-55·1), median overall survival was 48·0 months (95% CI 33·6-64·8) in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 49·2 months (34·8-74·4) in the trimodality therapy group (3-year overall survival 55% [95% CI 47-62] vs 57% [49-64]; hazard ratio 1·03 [95% CI 0·77-1·38]; log-rank p=0·82). Median disease-free survival was 32·4 months (95% CI 22·8-64·8) in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 24·0 months (18·0-40·8) in the trimodality therapy gro[...]

09:55

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Sep 8;64:102194. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102194. eCollection 2023 Oct.