ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that misdiagnosis contributes to the high mortality rate in lung cancer patients complicated with pulmonary embolism (PE). This current study analyzed predictors of PE in lung cancer patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with the aim of personalizing the treatment and management of patients with PE.

METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included lung cancer patients with DVT at the emergency department of Shanghai Chest Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. Patients were classified as having DVT with or without PE. The following characteristics were examined, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, surgical trauma, hyperlipidemia, long-term bedridden status, calf swelling, coronary heart disease, chronic pulmonary disease, DVT location, DVT type, prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), fibrinogen, and D-dimer, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS: A total of 90 patients with lung cancer and DVT were analyzed, of whom 60% (54/90) had PE. Those variables independently associated to PE were hypertension [odds ratio (OR): 7.883, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.038-30.495, P=0.003], long-term bedridden status (OR: 4.166, 95% CI: 1.236-14.044, P=0.021), and D-dimer levels (OR: 2.123, 95% CI: 1.476-3.053, P=0.000) were identified as independent risk factors for PE. The cut-off value of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting PE by presented scoring system according to the risk factors was 1.5 and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.84 (P

CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension, being bedridden for an extended period, and elevated serum D-dimer levels were independent risk factors of PE in lung cancer patients with lower extremity DVT. Novel strategies for patient management should be developed to decrease the risk of PE.

PMID:37577319 | PMC:PMC10413029 | DOI:10.21037/tlcr-23-346

12:53

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

12:53

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

12:53

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Anticoagulation strategies and long-term recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism in the era of direct oral anticoagulants

Eur J Intern Med. 2023 Aug 11:S0953-6205(23)00291-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.08.007. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There has been limited data on anticoagulation strategies and long-term recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the era of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC).

METHODS: The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolling 5197 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE between January 2015 and August 2020 among 31 centers in Japan. In this primary report, the entire cohort was divided into 5 groups; major transient risk factors (N = 475, 9.1%), minor transient risk factors (N = 788, 15%), unprovoked (N = 1913, 37%), non-malignant persistent risk factors (N = 514, 9.9%), and active cancer (N = 1507, 29%) groups.

RESULTS: DOACs were administered in 79% of patients who received oral anticoagulants. Discontinuation of anticoagulant at 1 year was most frequent in the major transient risk factors group (57.2%, 46.3%, 29.1%, 32.0%, and 45.6%). The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was lowest in the major transient risk factors group (2.6%, 6.4%, 11.0%, 12.1%, and 10.1%, P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was highest in the active cancer group (9.8%, 11.4%, 11.0%, 15.5%, and 20.4%, P < 0.001). After discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy, the cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was highest in the unprovoked group (3.3%, 11.0%, 24.9%, 17.5%, and 11.8%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world VTE registry, anticoagulation strategies and long-term recurrence widely differed depending on the baseline characteristics. Detailed risk stratifications of recurrent VTE could be useful for decision-making of anticoagulation strategies, whereas the bleeding-risk assessment might be especially important in the era of DOAC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm Unique identifier: UMIN000044816.

PMID:37574348 | DOI:10.1016/j.ejim.2023.08.007

12:53

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

12:53

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

12:53

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

12:53

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

12:53

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

12:53

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Endovenous ablation for venous leg ulcers

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 27;7(7):CD009494. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009494.pub3. ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a serious manifestation of chronic venous disease affecting up to 3% of the adult population. This typically recalcitrant and recurring condition significantly impairs quality of life, and its treatment places a heavy financial burden upon healthcare systems. The longstanding mainstay treatment for VLUs is compression therapy. Surgical removal of incompetent veins reduces the risk of ulcer recurrence. However, open surgery is an unpopular option amongst people with VLU, and many people are unsuitable for it. The efficacy of the newer, minimally-invasive endovenous techniques has been established in uncomplicated superficial venous disease, and these techniques can also be used in the management of VLU. When used with compression, endovenous ablation aims to further reduce pressure in the veins of the leg, which may impact ulcer healing.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of superficial endovenous ablation on the healing and recurrence of venous leg ulcers and the quality of life of people with venous ulcer disease.

SEARCH METHODS: In April 2022 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scrutinised reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions on the language of publication, but there was a restriction on publication year from 1998 to April 2022 as superficial endovenous ablation is a comparatively new technology.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing endovenous ablative techniques with compression versus compression therapy alone for the treatment of VLU were eligible for inclusion. Studies needed to have assessed at least one of the following primary review outcomes related to objective measures of ulcer healing such as: proportion of ulcers healed at a given time point; time to complete healing; change in ulcer size; proportion of ulcers recurring over a given time period or at a specific point; or ulcer-free days. Secondary outcomes of interest were patient-reported quality of life, economic data and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data, carried out risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 1 tool, and assessed GRADE certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS: The previous version of this review found no RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria. In this update, we identified two eligible RCTs and included them in a meta-analysis. There was a total of 506 participants with an active VLU, with mean durations of 3.1 months ± 1.1 months in the EVRA trial and 60.5 months ± 96.4 months in the VUERT trial. Both trials randomised participants to endovenous treatment and compression or compression alone, however the compression alone group in the EVRA trial received deferred endovenous treatment (after ulcer healing or from six months). There is high-certainty evidence that combined endovenous ablation and compression compared with compression therapy alone, or compression with deferred endovenous treatment, improves time to complete ulcer healing (pooled hazard ratio (HR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.47; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 466 participants). There is moderate-certainty evidence that the proportion of ulcers healed at [...]

12:53

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Preoperative D-dimer Value and Lower Limb Venous Ultrasound for Deep Venous Thrombosis Prevents Postoperative Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Retrospective Study

J Anus Rectum Colon. 2023 Jul 25;7(3):159-167. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2022-071. eCollection 2023.