ABSTRACT

Atrial fibrillation (AF) can increase thrombosis, especially arterial thrombosis, and some studies show that AF patients have a higher risk of developing pulmonary embolism (PE). The objective of our study is to investigate whether there is a direct causal effect of AF on PE. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach was utilized to determine whether there is a causal relationship between AF and PE. European population-based consortia provided statistical data on the associations between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and relevant traits. The AF dataset was obtained from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) comprising 60,620 cases and 970,216 controls, while a GWAS of 1846 cases and 461,164 controls identified genetic variations associated with PE. Estimation of the causal effect was mainly performed using the random effects inverse-variance weighted method (IVW). Additionally, other tests such as MR-Egger intercept, MR-PRESSO, Cochran's Q test, "Leave-one-out," and funnel plots were conducted to assess the extent of pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Using 70 SNPs, there was no evidence to suggest an association between genetically predicted AF and risk of PE with multiplicative random-effects IVW MR analysis (odds ratio = 1.0003, 95% confidence interval: 0.9998-1.0008, P = 0.20). A null association was also observed in other methods. MR-Egger regression and MR-PRESSO respectively showed no evidence of directional (intercept, - 2.25; P = 0.94) and horizontal(P-value in the global heterogeneity test = 0.99) pleiotropic effect across the genetic variants. No substantial evidence was found to support the causal role of AF in the development of PE. Causal effect of atrial fibrillation on pulmonary embolism: a Mendelian randomization study. AF atrial fibrillation, PE pulmonary embolism, GWAS genome-wide association studies, SNPs single nucleotide polymorphisms, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.

PMID:37839022 | DOI:10.1007/s11239-023-02903-w

03:09

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Catheter Directed Thrombectomy and Other Deep Venous Interventions in Cancer Patients

Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Jun;26(2):100900. doi: 10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100900. Epub 2023 Aug 5.

ABSTRACT

Treating cancer patients with deep venous thrombosis/venous thromboembolism (DVT/VTE) can be challenging as patients are frequently unable to receive the standard therapy of anticoagulation due to the increased risk of bleeding complications seen in this population. Similarly, the hesitation of interventionalists to use thrombolytic agents due to bleeding risks limits percutaneous intervention options as well. Further, outcome data and guidelines do not exist for oncologic patients and often treatment is tailored to patient-specific factors after multidisciplinary discussion. This article reviews specific factors to consider when planning percutaneous treatment of cancer patients with DVT/VTE, focusing on the iliocaval system.

PMID:37865450 | DOI:10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100900

03:09

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

The prevalence of relevant drug-drug interactions and associated clinical outcomes in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis on concurrent anticoagulation and anticancer or supportive care therapies

Thromb Res. 2023 Oct 11;231:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.10.004. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A main concern in the management of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between anticoagulants and anticancer therapies. Their clinical implications remain unclear.

METHODS: To quantify the prevalence of DDIs and risks of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding events in patients with CAT on anticoagulation, we conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients with CAT on concurrent anticoagulants and anticancer and/or supportive care therapies. All patients were followed for 6 months from CAT diagnosis or until death (whichever occurred first). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with anticoagulant DDIs classified as risk C, D, or X in Lexicomp® at any time during the 6 months. Secondary outcomes included recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding events. We calculated the 6-month cumulative incidence of outcomes with 95 % confidence interval (CI) and compared those with and without DDIs, considering death as a competing risk.

RESULTS: Among 267 patients included, 111 (41.6 %) had DDIs with anticoagulants at any time during the study. Those on DOACs at any time had more DDIs compared to LMWH (50.9 % vs 19.3 %, p < 0.0001). The 6-month incidence was 8.2 % (95 % CI 5.3-11.9) for recurrent VTE and 6.7 % (95 % CI 4.2-10.2) for clinically relevant bleeding, with no significant differences between groups with or without DDIs.

CONCLUSIONS: There are high incidences of DDIs in patients with CAT on anticoagulants, more with DOACs. DDIs classified as risk C, D, or X by Lexicomp® were not associated with recurrent VTE or bleeding events in our cohort.

PMID:37857226 | DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.10.004

03:09

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

In vivo evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interactions between almonertinib and rivaroxaban, almonertinib and apixaban

Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 4;14:1263975. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1263975. eCollection 2023.