ABSTRACT

Anthracyclic (ANT) drugs are widely used for patients with malignant tumors and can markedly prolong the disease-free survival rate of patients. As its clinical application becomes more common, information regarding serious cardiotoxicity as a result of ANT treatment is becoming understood. However, to the best of our knowledge, delayed-onset cardiotoxicity due to ANT use has not been studied sufficiently. The present report describes a 36-year-old male patient who presented to Guiqian International General Hospital (Guiyang, China) with a complaint of dyspnea in the last 10 days. Substantially elevated B-type natriuretic peptide levels and echocardiography showing enlargement of the entire heart, of the patient suggested that severe heart failure was the cause of his symptoms. However, the cause of this potential heart failure was not apparent until the patient was questioned about his cancer treatment history. Following consultation to evaluate the assessment of end-stage heart failure, currently only anti-heart failure treatment and symptomatic treatment can be provided. The present report describes this case and reviews the existing literature to provide a basis for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with delayed-onset heart failure following ANT treatment.

PMID:37822590 | PMC:PMC10562964 | DOI:10.3892/etm.2023.12204

20:10

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation Programs-The Next Phase in Improving Care for Cancer Survivors

JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Oct 11. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3568. Online ahead of print.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:37819675 | DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3568

20:10

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation for Cancer Survivors With High Cardiovascular Risk: A Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Oct 11:e233558. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3558. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity in cancer survivors, which makes strategies aimed at mitigating cardiovascular risk a subject of major contemporary importance.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) framework compared with usual care encompassing community-based exercise training (CBET) is superior for cardiorespiratory fitness improvement and cardiovascular risk factor control among cancer survivors with high cardiovascular risk.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective, single-center, randomized clinical trial (CORE trial) included adult cancer survivors who had exposure to cardiotoxic cancer treatment and/or previous cardiovascular disease. Enrollment took place from March 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. End points were assessed at baseline and after the 8-week intervention.

INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 8 weeks of CBCR or CBET. The combined aerobic and resistance exercise sessions were performed twice a week.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The powered primary efficacy measure was change in peak oxygen consumption (V̇o2) at 2 months. Secondary outcomes included handgrip maximal strength, functional performance, blood pressure (BP), body composition, body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), lipid profile, plasma biomarker levels, physical activity (PA) levels, psychological distress, quality of life (QOL), and health literacy.

RESULTS: A total of 75 participants completed the study (mean [SD] age, 53.6 [12.3] years; 58 [77.3%] female), with 38 in the CBCR group and 37 in the CBET group. Participants in CBCR achieved a greater mean (SD) increase in peak V̇o2 than those in CBET (2.1 [2.8] mL/kg/min vs 0.8 [2.5] mL/kg/min), with a between-group mean difference of 1.3 mL/kg/min (95% CI, 0.1-2.6 mL/kg/min; P = .03). Compared with the CBET group, the CBCR group also attained a greater mean (SD) reduction in systolic BP (-12.3 [11.8] mm Hg vs -1.9 [12.9] mm Hg; P < .001), diastolic BP (-5.0 [5.7] mm Hg vs -0.5 [7.0] mm Hg; P = .003), and BMI (-1.2 [0.9] vs 0.2 [0.7]; P < .001) and greater mean (SD) improvements in PA levels (1035.2 [735.7] metabolic equivalents [METs]/min/wk vs 34.1 [424.4] METs/min/wk; P < .001), QOL (14.0 [10.0] points vs 0.4 [12.9] points; P < .001), and health literacy scores (2.7 [1.6] points vs 0.1 [1.4] points; P < .001). Exercise adherence was significantly higher in the CBCR group than in the CBET group (mean [SD] sessions completed, 90.3% [11.8%] vs 68.4% [22.1%]; P < .001).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The CORE trial showed that a cardio-oncology rehabilitation model among cancer survivors with high cardiovascular risk was associated with greater improvements in peak V̇o2 compared with usual care encompassing an exercise intervention in a community setting. The CBCR also showed superior results in exercise adherence, cardiovascular risk factor control, QOL, and health literacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05132998.

PMID:37819656 | PMC:PMC10568446 | DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3558

20:10

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Tailored to a Woman's Heart: Gender Cardio-Oncology Across the Lifespan

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Oct 11. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01967-7. Online ahead of print.