ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly unprovoked VTE, is associated with occult cancer. Current guidelines recommend limited cancer screening in patients presenting with unprovoked VTE. Only half of the underlying cancer cases are detected by cancer screening, and the optimal screening regimen remains controversial. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are implicated in cancer-associated thrombosis and elevated biomarkers of NET formation are associated with poor prognosis.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study investigated the association between blood biomarkers associated with NETs and neutrophil activation (circulating nucleosomal citrullinated histone H3 [H3Cit-DNA], cell-free DNA, and neutrophil elastase) and cancer during a one-year follow-up.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Four-hundred-sixty VTE patients were included. Two hundred and twenty-one (48%) had isolated deep vein thrombosis, and 220 (48%) of all VTE cases were unprovoked. Cancer was diagnosed in 29 (7.0%) VTE patients during the follow-up period, and 43 patients had a known active cancer. After adjustment for age and unprovoked VTE, the hazard ratio of cancer during follow-up per 500 ng/ml increase of H3Cit-DNA was 1.79 [95% CI 1.03-3.10] suggesting that H3Cit-DNA is potentially a useful diagnostic marker for cancer in patients with VTE. Furthermore, patients with cancer-associated VTE (known active cancer or cancer diagnosed during follow-up) had higher levels of H3Cit-DNA compared to cancer-free patients with VTE after adjustment for age, hemoglobin, gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prior cancer and start of anticoagulant treatment (odds ratio 2.06 per 500 ng/ml increase of H3Cit-DNA [95% CI 1.35-3.13]), indicating that elevated NET formation is a hallmark of cancer-associated VTE.

PMID:37479035 | DOI:10.1016/j.jtha.2023.07.007

23:30

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Primary prevention of cancer-associated venous thrombosis: Rationale and challenges in clinical practice

Curr Res Transl Med. 2023 Jul 13;71(3):103405. doi: 10.1016/j.retram.2023.103405. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT) is a common, multifactor event known to complicate the course of cancer and jeopardize a patient's prognosis. The current guidelines regarding the prevention of CAT are sometimes considered insufficiently precise about specific situations, or are poorly applied. The expected benefits of thromboprophylaxis are balanced by the risk of major bleeding induced by anticoagulation, which implies a need to accurately identify ambulatory patients at high risk of thrombosis or hemorrhage. The Khorana score is commonly used for this, but is limited by the non-reproducibility of predicted performance across cancer types, and by the fact that antitumor treatment and cardiovascular risks are not included. The COMPASS-CAT score, which includes those two aspects, was found to be a more accurate predictor of venous thromboembolism in patients with lung cancer, and to better distinguish between patients at low or high risk of thrombosis. The frailty of patients with cancer is also a major issue, and should be taken into account when thromboprophylaxis is considered. According to current guidelines, CAT prophylaxis should be considered for hospitalized patients, those for whom surgery is scheduled, or those with pancreatic cancers. In ambulatory patients, decisions should be made according to patient, cancer and antitumoral treatment characteristics. Low molecular weight heparin is the gold standard of CAT prophylaxis. Despite increased risks of bleeding or drug-drug interactions in cancer patients, direct oral anticoagulants could be alternate options for high-risk ambulatory patients that should be accompanied by a careful global analysis of benefits, harms, and patient preferences.

PMID:37478777 | DOI:10.1016/j.retram.2023.103405

23:30

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Venous thromboembolism and breast cancer

Bull Cancer. 2023 Jul 18:S0007-4551(23)00296-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.06.001. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Patients with breast cancer have a 4-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to age- and sex-matched controls without cancer. VTE remains the second leading cause of death in cancer patients and an independent risk factor for mortality. In women with breast cancer, the main risk factors for developing VTE are increasing age, obesity, disease stage, central catheter placement and cancer treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, hormonotherapy and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. In women receiving tamoxifen, the risk of VTE is particularly increased within the first 6 months after initiation of hormonotherapy, although some evidence suggests that this risk may persist through the first 2 years of treatment. The risk of VTE appears to be lower in patients receiving aromatase inhibitors. In breast cancer patients receiving cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, the rate of VTE is approximately 6%. Current clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prevention of VTE in patients with cancer suggest that thromboprophylaxis should not be used routinely in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or hormonotherapy. The risk-benefit ratio of thromboprophylaxis should be assessed on a case-by-case basis and be the subject of multidisciplinary discussion.

PMID:37474353 | DOI:10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.06.001

23:30

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

23:30

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Risk of thromboembolic events in patients with metastatic solid tumors treated with PARP inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials

Cancer Treat Rev. 2023 Jul 17;119:102601. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102601. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND SCOPE: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have revolutionized cancer treatment in recent years. These drugs present a favorable safety profile, even though the potential risk of thromboembolic events (TEs) during their use has not been addressed yet. In addition, PARPi have been involved in an active scientific debate regarding non-oncologic indications, particularly during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic, including potential anti-thromboembolic effect.

METHODS: To clarify whether patients treated with PARPi for metastatic solid tumors are either at increased or decreased risk of TEs, we conducted a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, including all phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which investigated PARPi in this setting. Search was conducted through Medline, EMBASE, Pubmed, SCOPUS and Google Scholar in February 2023, including the proceedings of the principal oncology meetings of the last 10 years, with no time restriction. For each included study, frequencies of TEs in experimental and control arm were collected.

RESULTS: Our search identified 2,369 reports, of which 20 were lastly selected. A total of 4,946 patients were included, across 12 different RCTs. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate either an increased or a reduced risk in TEs in patients treated with PARPi for metastatic disease (OR 1.50, range: 1.00-2.24; 95% CI; P = 0.050), with low heterogeneity and low publication bias.

CONCLUSION: Although our research did not confirm either increased or decreased risk of TEs for PARPi use, no safety alerts emerged. Thromboembolic risk assessment models should always be integrated in daily clinical routine, to identify high-risk patients.

PMID:37473517 | DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102601

23:30

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Heparin reversal with protamine sulfate after Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP): is less more?

Cancer Imaging. 2023 Jul 14;23(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00590-7.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a palliative intraarterial therapy for unresectable hepatic malignancies. During PHP, high-dose melphalan is infused via the hepatic artery to saturate tumor in the liver with the chemotherapeutic substance. The venous hepatic blood is filtered by an extracorporeal melphalan specific filtration system. Blood clotting in the extracorporeal filter system is prevented by administering unfractionated heparin (UFH) in high doses, which might be reversed with protamine sulfate after the procedure. Aim of this retrospective two-center-study was to analyze the potential effect of UFH reversal with protamine sulfate on complication rates following PHP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients receiving PHP treatment between 10/2014 and 04/2021 were classified according to their intraprocedural coagulation management: 92 patients/192 PHP received full UFH reversal with protamine (groupPROTAMINE); 13 patients/21 PHP in groupREDUCED_PROTAMINE received a reduced amount of protamine, and 28 patients/43 PHP did not receive UFH reversal with protamine (groupNO_PROTAMINE). Periinterventional clinical reports, findings and laboratory values were retrospectively evaluated. Complications and adverse events were classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAEv5.0).

RESULTS: Thromboembolic events were recorded after 10 PHP procedures (5%) in groupPROTAMINE, six of which (3%) were major events (CTCAE grade 3-5). No (0%) thromboembolic events were recorded in groupREDUCED_PROTAMINE and groupNO_PROTAMINE. Hemorrhagic events were registered after 24 PHP (13%) in groupPROTAMINE, two of which (1%) were major (CTCAE grade 3-4). In groupREDUCED_PROTAMINE, only minor bleeding events were recorded, and one major hemorrhagic event was documented in groupNO_PROTAMINE (2%). There was a significant difference between the percentage of post-interventional thrombopenia in groupPROTAMINE (39%) and groupREDUCED_PROTAMINE (14%) versus groupNO_PROTAMINE (23%) (p=.00024). In groupPROTAMINE one patient suffered from a severe anaphylactic shock after the administration of protamine.

CONCLUSION: Our retrospective study implies that there might be a link between the practice of protamine sulfate administration to reverse the full hemodilutive effect of UFH after PHP and the post-interventional risk of thromboembolic events as well as clinically significant thrombopenia. Our data suggest that the standard use of protamine sulfate after PHP in low-risk patients without clinical signs of active bleeding should be critically re-evaluated.

PMID:37452405 | PMC:PMC10349410 | DOI:10.1186/s40644-023-00590-7

23:30

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib as first-line therapy for advanced non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-B61): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial

Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jul 11:S1470-2045(23)00276-0. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00276-0. Online ahead of print.