ABSTRACT
Direct oral anticoagulants against activated factor X and thrombin were the last milestone in thrombosis treatment. Step by step, they replaced antivitamin K and heparins in most of their therapeutic indications. As effective as the previous anticoagulant, the decreased but persistent risk of bleeding while using direct oral anticoagulants has created space for new therapeutics aiming to provide the same efficacy with better safety. On this basis, drug targeting factor XI emerged as an option. In particular, cancer patients might be one of the populations that will most benefit from this technical advance. In this review, after a brief presentation of the different factor IX inhibitors, we explore the potential benefit of this new treatment for cancer patients.
PMID:37833881 | PMC:PMC10572808 | DOI:10.3390/ijms241914433
23:09
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Concomitant Cerebral Venous Thrombosis and Intracranial Hemorrhages in Presentation of a Patient with Secondary Polycythemia: A Case Report
Am J Case Rep. 2023 Oct 15;24:e941507. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.941507.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Cerebral ischemia and hemorrhages were reported to be the main complications of polycythemia vera (PV). The relationship between PV and increased risk of the cerebrovascular events has been established. Some patients with secondary polycythemia have thromboembolic events comparable to those of PV. However, secondary polycythemia that leads to cerebrovascular events is uncommon. CASE REPORT A 35-year-old man without any prior medical history presented with mild clinical acute ischemic stroke and polycythemia. The patient then showed worsening neurological deficits that were later attributed to the concurrent cerebral venous thrombosis, which led to malignant cerebral infarction with hemorrhagic transformation, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. His polycythemia appeared to be secondary to bacterial infection. The treatments for the secondary polycythemia were first phlebotomy and intravenous hydration, followed by intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics. PV was excluded because the JAK2 V617F mutation was absent, the patient's peripheral blood smear suggested secondary polycythemia due to bacterial infection, and there were improvements in hemoglobin, erythrocyte count, and hematocrit after intravenous antibiotics. At the 1-month follow-up, he was moderately dependent, and hemoglobin, erythrocyte count, and hematocrit were within normal limits, without receiving any further phlebotomy or cytoreductive agents. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the plausible causation of secondary polycythemia that could lead to concomitant cerebral thrombosis and hemorrhagic events. The diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis should be considered in a patient who presents with headache, focal neurological deficits, polycythemia, and normal head computed tomography scan.
PMID:37838828 | PMC:PMC10584197 | DOI:10.12659/AJCR.941507
23:10
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Implementation of routine venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Oct 11;178:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.001. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy before and after implementing routine thromboprophylaxis.
METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental pre-post study evaluating the VTE rate in patients with ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy following a quality improvement initiative of routine thromboprophylaxis within a single healthcare system that started in January 2017. Patients were excluded if VTE was diagnosed before initiating chemotherapy. Patient factors and perioperative variables of interest were investigated for their association with VTE through univariate and multivariate models.
RESULTS: Of the 136 patients in the pre-implementation group, 3.7% (n = 5) received thromboprophylaxis. Of the 154 patients in the post-implementation group, 65.6% (n = 101) received thromboprophylaxis. Provider compliance varied from 51% in 2019 to 79.3% in 2021. The overall rate of VTE, from the start of chemotherapy to the end of treatment, was 21.3% (n = 29) pre- and 8.4% (n = 13) in the post-implementation group (p < 0.01). There was no difference in major bleeding events between groups (0% vs. 0.68%, p = 0.63). On univariate analysis, thromboprophylaxis (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-0.52) and post-implementation period (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.17-0.69) were associated with a decreased risk of any VTE during primary treatment. On multivariate analysis, only thromboprophylaxis remained significantly associated with reduced VTE rates (aOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-0.53).
CONCLUSION: Routine thromboprophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with reduced risk of VTE throughout primary treatment and is not associated with increased bleeding events.
PMID:37832182 | DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.001
23:10
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 Aug 20;7(7):102173. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102173. eCollection 2023 Oct.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Evidenced-based interventions have been developed to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer, including VTE-risk assessment for all patients and targeted primary thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients. Despite supportive evidence and recommendations, oncologists rarely assess VTE risk or provide primary prophylaxis. Our previous work identified barriers and facilitators to using VTE prevention interventions in oncology practice.
OBJECTIVES: To identify potential strategies that address the identified barriers and leverage facilitators to achieve successful implementation of evidence-based interventions for VTE prevention in oncology practice.
METHODS: We used the Implementation Research Logic Model, an implementation science framework, to map the relationships among barriers and facilitators, feasible and effective implementation strategies, and implementation and clinical outcomes that will be used to evaluate the implementation strategies.
RESULTS: We identified 12 discrete implementation strategies (eg, conducting clinician education and training and staged implementation scale-up) that address barriers and leverage facilitators through their mechanisms of action (eg, increased clinician awareness of evidence and targeting the highest effectiveness). We identified key implementation (eg, penetration, adoption, acceptability, fidelity, appropriateness, and sustainability), system (eg, integration of VTE-risk assessment into clinical workflow), and clinical (eg, lower VTE rates) outcomes targeted by the selected strategies.
CONCLUSION: Using the Implementation Research Logic Model framework and building on our knowledge of barriers and facilitators, we identified implementation strategies and important outcomes to evaluate these strategies. We will use these results to test and measure the strategies to improve the uptake of evidence-based recommendations for VTE prevention in oncology practice.
PMID:37822563 | PMC:PMC10562910 | DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102173
23:10
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Complications of Central Venous Access Devices Used in Palliative Care Settings for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 25;15(19):4712. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194712.
ABSTRACT
(1) Background: Central venous access devices (CVADs) have been commonly employed during various courses of anticancer treatment. Currently, there are a few types of clinically available CVADs, which are associated with short-term and long-term complications. However, little is known about the complication rates when CVADs are used only in palliative care settings. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all the published literature to evaluate the complication rates of CVADs in this clinical setting. (2) Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to identify publications from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and trial registries. Publications reporting the complication rates of PICCs, central lines, and PORTs in palliative settings for terminally ill cancer patients were included, while those on the use of systemic anticancer therapy and peripheral venous catheters were excluded. The outcome measures included overall complication rate, rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and rate of thromboembolism (TE). This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023404489). (3) Results: Five publications with 327 patients were analyzed, including four studies on PICCs and one study on central lines. No studies on PORTs were eligible for analysis. The overall complication rate for PICCs (pooled estimate 7.02%, 95% CI 0.27-19.10) was higher than that for central lines (1.44%, 95% CI 0.30-4.14, p = 0.002). The risk of CRBSI with PICCs (2.03%, 95% CI 0.00-9.62) was also higher than that with central lines (0.96%, 95% CI 0.12-3.41, p = 0.046). PICCs also had a trend of a higher risk of TE (2.10%, 95% CI 0.00-12.22) compared to central lines (0.48%, 95% CI 0.01-2.64, p = 0.061). (4) Conclusions: PICCs for palliative cancer care were found to have greater complications than central lines. This might aid in the formulation of future recommendation guidelines on the choice of CVAD in this setting.
PMID:37835406 | PMC:PMC10571956 | DOI:10.3390/cancers15194712
23:10
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
An etiological assessment of a deep vein thrombosis led to the discovery of a renal tumor collision: Case report
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Oct;111:108922. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108922. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع