ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), can manifest itself in several ways, including coagulopathy and thrombosis. These complications can be the first and sometimes only manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection and can occur early or late in the course of the disease. However, these symptoms are more prevalent in hospitalized venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients, particularly those admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Moreover, various forms of arterial and venous thrombosis, or micro- or macro-vasculature embolisms, have been reported during the current pandemic. They have led to harmful consequences, such as neurological and cardiac events, nearly all resulting from the hypercoagulable state caused by this viral infection. The severe hypercoagulability observed in COVID-19 patients accounts for most cases of the disease that become critical. Therefore, anticoagulants seem to be one of the most vital therapeutics for treating this potentially life-threatening condition. In the current article, we present a thorough review of the pathophysiology of COVID-19-induced hypercoagulable state and the use of anticoagulants to treat SARS-CoV-2 infections in different patient groups, as well as their pros and cons.

PMID:37326220 | DOI:10.1111/cts.13569

23:56

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

23:56

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Interventional radiological therapies in colorectal hepatic metastases

Front Oncol. 2023 May 30;13:963966. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.963966. eCollection 2023.

ABSTRACT

Colorectal malignancy is the third most common cancer and one of the prevalent causes of death globally. Around 20-25% of patients present with metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 50-60% of patients develop metastases in due course of the disease. Liver, followed by lung and lymph nodes, are the most common sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In such patients, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 19.2%. Although surgical resection is the primary mode of managing colorectal cancer metastases, only 10-25% of patients are competent for curative therapy. Hepatic insufficiency may be the aftermath of extensive surgical hepatectomy. Hence formal assessment of future liver remnant volume (FLR) is imperative prior to surgery to prevent hepatic failure. The evolution of minimally invasive interventional radiological techniques has enhanced the treatment algorithm of patients with colorectal cancer metastases. Studies have demonstrated that these techniques may address the limitations of curative resection, such as insufficient FLR, bi-lobar disease, and patients at higher risk for surgery. This review focuses on curative and palliative role through procedures including portal vein embolization, radioembolization, and ablation. Alongside, we deliberate various studies on conventional chemoembolization and chemoembolization with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads. The radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres has evolved as salvage therapy in surgically unresectable and chemo-resistant metastases.

PMID:37324012 | PMC:PMC10266282 | DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.963966

23:56

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Utility of the intraflap perfusion procedure for abdominal free flap in unilateral breast reconstruction

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 May 19;84:54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.05.039. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heparin prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism can be used in microsurgery. If vein anastomosis is performed before the artery, heparin irrigation into the artery can be performed locally without systematic effect. This study aimed to introduce this "intraflap perfusion procedure" in autologous breast reconstruction.

METHODS: Among the 220 patients with unilateral breast cancer who had received the free abdominal flap, we retrospectively compared those that had undergone the intraflap perfusion procedure (n = 108) and those who did not (n = 112). A 10 mL injection of heparinized physiological saline solution (100 units/mL) was administered into the deep inferior epigastric artery. Intraflap perfusion was performed before, during, and after vein anastomosis, without the vessel clip of the vein. Artery anastomosis was performed without the use of a vein clamp. Further, vein anastomosis was performed tightly to prevent leakage from the vein anastomosis site during artery anastomosis.

RESULTS: The rates of superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) superdrainage (18.5% vs. 42.0%, P < 0.001), and intraoperative flap congestion (0.9% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.01) were significantly lower in patients undergoing this procedure. There were no significant differences regarding other factors (age, BMI, laterality, comorbidities, and other operative details).

CONCLUSIONS: Intraflap perfusion prevented long-term stasis at the venous anastomosis site and capillary level. It could reduce flap congestion. SIEV superdrainage was performed to manage flap congestion, particularly in patients who did not undergo this procedure. Consequently, it can be inferred that this procedure reduces the rate of superdrainage.

PMID:37320952 | DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2023.05.039

23:56

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

23:56

In reply to this message

Median progression-free survival was 9·0 months (95% CI 7·7-10·5) in group A versus 10·6 months (9·9-12·1) in group B (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·76 [95% CI 0·60-0·98]; p=0·032), and 10·8 months (95% CI 9·9-12·6) in group C versus 10·4 months (9·8-13·0) in group D (stratified HR 1·11 [95% CI 0·84-1·48]; p=0·46). The most frequent grade 3-4 events in groups A and B were neutropenia (19 [13%] patients in group A vs 57 [40%] in group B; p<0·0001),<0·0001),<0·0001),

INTERPRETATION: In patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases, FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab was the preferred treatment in patients with a right-sided or RAS or BRAFV600E mutated primary tumour. In patients with a left-sided and RAS and BRAFV600E wild-type tumour, the addition of panitumumab to FOLFOX or FOLFIRI showed no clinical benefit over bevacizumab, but was associated with more toxicity.

FUNDING: Roche and Amgen.

PMID:37329889 | DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00219-X

23:56

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

23:57

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Reduction of Venous Thromboembolic Disease in Colorectal Surgery

Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Jun 12. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002975. Online ahead of print.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:37318130 | DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000002975

23:57

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Association of D-dimer Levels with Complications after Subcutaneous Implantable Central Venous Port Placement in Combination Chemotherapy with Bevacizumab for Colorectal Cancer

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2023 Jun;50(6):713-717.

ABSTRACT

Bevacizumab(BV)combination chemotherapy in colorectal cancer under subcutaneously implanted central venous port (CVP)implantation may cause complications after the implantation. Measurement of D-dimer is recommended to predict thromboembolism and other complications, but its relevance to complications after CVP implantation remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the association between D-dimer and complications after CVP implantation in 93 patients with colorectal cancer who received BV combination chemotherapy. Complications after CVP implantation occurred in 26 patients (28%), and those with VTE showed higher D-dimer values at the onset of the complication. The D-dimer values of the patients with VTE displayed a sharp increase at the onset of the disease, while those with an abnormal CVP implantation site showed a more variable course. Measurement of D-dimer levels appeared useful in estimating the incidence of VTE and abnormal CVP implantation sites in post-CVP implantation complications of BV combination chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Further, monitoring not only the quantitative values but also the fluctuations over time is also important.

PMID:37317606

23:57

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Risk of retinal vein occlusion in colorectal cancer patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factors - a population-based cohort study

BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11037-4.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) treatment has been associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Therefore, the use of anti-VEGFs for patients with colorectal cancers (CRC) has raised concerns about the potential risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO), an ocular disease caused by embolism or venous stasis. This study aims to evaluate the risk of RVO in patients with CRC treated with anti-VEGFs.

METHOD: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Database. The study cohort comprised patients newly diagnosed with CRC between 2011 and 2017, who received anti-VEGF treatment. For each patient in the study cohort, a control group comprising four patients newly diagnosed with CRC, but not receiving anti-VEGF treatment, was randomly selected. A washout period of 12 months was implemented to identify new cases. The index date was defined as the date of the first prescription of anti-VEGF drugs. The study outcome was the incidence of RVO, as identified by ICD-9-CM (362.35 and 362.36) or ICD-10-CM codes (H3481 and H3483). Patients were followed from their index date until the occurrence of RVO, death or the end of the study period. Covariates, including patients' age at index date, sex, calendar year of CRC diagnosis, stage of CRC and comorbidities related to RVO, were included. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with adjustments for all covariates to compare the risk of RVO between the anti-VEGF and control groups.

RESULTS: We recruited 6285 patients in the anti-VEGF group and 37,250 patients in the control group, with mean ages of 59.49 ± 12.11 and 63.88 ± 13.17 years, respectively. The incidence rates were 1.06 per 1000 person-years for the anti-VEGF group, and 0.63 per 1000 person-years for the controls. There was no statistically significant difference in RVO risk between the anti-VEGF and control groups (HR: 2.21, 95% CI: 0.87-5.61).

CONCLUSION: Our results indicated no association between use of anti-VEGF and occurrence of RVO among CRC patients, although the crude incidence rate of RVO was higher in patients receiving anti-VEGF, compared to control patients. Future study with larger sample size is required to confirm our findings.

PMID:37316803 | PMC:PMC10265868 | DOI:10.1186/s12885-023-11037-4

23:57

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Analysis of the Incidence of Lower Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis and Its Related Risk Factors in the Postoperative Patients with Lung Cancer

Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2023 May 20;26(5):386-391. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2023.102.16.