ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emulating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by real-world evidence (RWE) studies would benefit future clinical and regulatory decision-making by balancing the limitations of RCT. We aimed to evaluate whether the findings from RWE studies can support regulatory decisions derived from RCTs of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE).

METHODS: Five landmark trials (AMPLIFY, RE-COVER II, Hokusai-VTE, EINSTEIN-DVT, and EINSTEIN-PE) of NOACs were emulated using the South Korean nationwide claims database (January 2012 to August 2020). We applied an active comparator and new-user design to include patients who initiated oral anticoagulants within 28 days from their VTE diagnoses. The prespecified eligibility criteria, exposure (each NOAC, such as apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban), comparator (conventional therapy, defined as subcutaneous heparin followed by warfarin), and the definition of outcomes from RCTs were emulated as closely as possible in each separate emulation cohort. The primary outcome was identical to each trial, which was defined as recurrent VTE or VTE-related death. The safety outcome was major bleeding. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance 69 covariates between the exposure groups. Effect estimates for outcomes were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and Cox proportional hazards model and subsequently compared with the corresponding RCT estimates.

RESULTS: Compared to trial populations, real-world study populations were older (range: 63-69 years [RWE] vs. 54-59 years [RCT]), with more females (55-60.5% vs. 39-48.3%) and had a higher prevalence of active cancer (4.2-15.4% vs. 2.5-9.5%). The emulated estimates for effectiveness outcomes showed superior effectiveness of NOAC (AMPLIFY: relative risk 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.94; RE-COVER II: hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 0.37-0.96; Hokusai-VTE: 0.49, 0.31-0.78; EINSTEIN-DVT: 0.54, 0.33-0.89; EINSTEIN-PE: 0.50, 0.34-0.74), when contrasted with trials that showed non-inferiority. For safety outcomes, all emulations except for AMPLIFY and EINSTEIN-DVT yielded results consistent with their corresponding RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the feasibility of complementing RCTs with RWE studies by using claims data in patients with VTE. Future studies to consider the different demographic characteristics between RCT and RWE populations are needed.

PMID:37775786 | PMC:PMC10542685 | DOI:10.1186/s12916-023-03069-1

02:09

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Risk of thromboembolic events associated with different multiple myeloma regimens in Taiwan: a nested case-control study

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Nov;56(4):578-587. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02887-7. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

ABSTRACT

Although novel agents for multiple myeloma (MM) have a better response rate and survival in both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM patients, concerns regarding the association between MM treatments and thromboembolic events have been raised. The aim of this population-based study was to examine the association between different combinations of MM treatments and the risk of thromboembolic events. We conducted a nested case-control study using the Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR) and National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Adult patients newly diagnosed with MM and treated with at least one of the immunomodulatory agents between 2008 and 2016 were identified. Among them, we further identified patients who developed thromboembolic events as cases and selected controls matched by age, sex and duration of MM diagnosis at a ratio of 1:5. The index date was defined as the day one year before the diagnosis date of thromboembolic events in the case group and the corresponding date in the control group. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine the association between different MM treatment regimens and the risk of thromboembolic events. A total of 4,180 newly diagnosed MM patients treated with at least one of the immunomodulatory agents were identified (mean age: 67.2 years; male: 55.7%). In this MM cohort, we further identified 388 cases and 1,940 matched controls (mean age: 71 years; male: 64.2%). The use of a thalidomide/bortezomib/steroid combination (odds ratio (OR) 2.95 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-5.95]), thalidomide monotherapy (OR 3.33; 95% CI, 1.59-6.94), and a thalidomide/steroid combination (OR 4.24; 95% CI, 2.00-8.98) were associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Other risk factors, particularly a history of thromboembolic events, including ischemic heart disease and pulmonary embolism, were significantly associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events. We found that the use of thalidomide alone and in specific combinations was associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events.

PMID:37737970 | DOI:10.1007/s11239-023-02887-7

02:10

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis practices for patients with sickle cell disease prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2023 Sep 21. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000001250. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are predisposed to a hypercoagulable state due to alterations in the coagulation system. Despite concern for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this population, there are no standardized guidelines for routine thromboprophylaxis. The objective of this study was to assess thromboprophylaxis practices of adult and pediatric treaters of SCD before and during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to pediatric and adult hematology oncology practitioners through seven SCD-specific interest groups between May 29, 2020, and July 13, 2020. Of 93 total responses, 14% (N = 13) reported they only treat patients more than 21 years old; 38.7% (N = 36) only treat patients 0-21 years old and 47.3% (N = 44) reported they treat both. Our study showed that before the COVID-19 pandemic, 96% of adult practitioners would recommend pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, mechanical thromboprophylaxis or both for hospitalized adults with thromboprophylaxis, but only 76% of pediatric treaters would recommend any thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized children (P < 0.0001), with 24% of pediatric treaters choosing no thromboprophylaxis at all. During the COVID-19 pandemic, pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis specifically was recommended for adults by 94% of treaters and for pediatric patients by 76% of treaters. These findings suggest that despite the lack of evidence-based thromboprophylaxis guidelines in adults and children with thromboprophylaxis, subspecialty treaters routinely provide pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in their adult patients and will modify their practice in pediatric patients who are considered at a high risk for VTE.

PMID:37756203 | DOI:10.1097/MBC.0000000000001250

02:10

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Surgery As a Trigger for Incident Venous Thromboembolism: Results from a Population-Based Case-Crossover Study