ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Septic cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a recognized complication of pediatric sinogenic and otogenic intracranial infections. The optimal treatment paradigm remains controversial. Proponents of anticoagulation highlight its role in preventing thrombus propagation and promoting recanalization, while others cite the risk of hemorrhagic complications, especially after a neurosurgical procedure for an epidural abscess or subdural empyema. Here, the authors investigated the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of pediatric patients with sinogenic or otogenic intracranial infections and a septic CVST.

METHODS: All patients 21 years of age or younger, who presented with an intracranial infection in the setting of sinusitis or otitis media and who underwent neurosurgical treatment at Connecticut Children's, Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego, or Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago from March 2015 to March 2023, were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were systematically collated.

RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were treated for sinusitis-related and/or otitis media-related intracranial infections during the study period, 15 (15.6%) of whom were diagnosed with a CVST. Of the 60 patients who presented prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 6 (10.0%) were diagnosed with a septic CVST, whereas of the 36 who presented during the COVID-19 pandemic, 9 (25.0%) had a septic CVST (p = 0.050). The superior sagittal sinus was involved in 12 (80.0%) patients and the transverse and/or sigmoid sinuses in 4 (26.7%). Only 1 (6.7%) patient had a fully occlusive thrombus. Of the 15 patients with a septic CVST, 11 (73.3%) were initiated on anticoagulation at a median interval of 4 (IQR 3-5) days from the most recent neurosurgical procedure. Five (45.5%) patients who underwent anticoagulation demonstrated complete recanalization on follow-up imaging, and 4 (36.4%) had partial recanalization. Three (75.0%) patients who did not undergo anticoagulation demonstrated complete recanalization, and 1 (25.0%) had partial recanalization. None of the patients treated with anticoagulation experienced hemorrhagic complications.

CONCLUSIONS: Septic CVST is frequently identified among pediatric patients undergoing neurosurgical intervention for sinogenic and/or otogenic intracranial infections and may have become more prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anticoagulation can be used safely in the acute postoperative period if administered cautiously, in a monitored setting, and with interval cross-sectional imaging. However, some patients exhibit excellent outcomes without anticoagulation, and further studies are needed to identify those who may benefit the most from anticoagulation.

PMID:37778041 | DOI:10.3171/2023.7.FOCUS23374

02:10

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

A case report: A patient rescued by VA-ECMO after cardiac arrest triggered by trigeminocardiac reflex after nasal surgery

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 29;102(39):e35226. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035226.

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Cardiac arrest (CA) caused by trigeminocardiac reflex (TCR) after endoscopic nasal surgery is rare. Hence, when a patient suffers from TCR induced CA in the recovery room, most doctors may not be able to find the cause in a short time, and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitation measures may not be effective. Providing circulatory assistance through venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can help healthcare providers gain time to identify the etiology and initiate symptom-specific treatment.

PATIENT CONCERNS: We report a rare case of CA after endoscopic nasal surgery treated with VA-ECMO.

DIAGNOSES: We excluded myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, allergies, hypoxia, and electrolyte abnormalities based on the relevant examination results. Following a multidisciplinary consultation, clinical manifestation and a review of previous literature, we reasoned that the CA was due to TCR.

INTERVENTIONS: VA-ECMO was established to resuscitate the patient successfully during effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OUTCOMES: ECMO was successfully evacuated a period of 190 minutes of therapy. The patient was discharged home on day 8.

LESSONS: TCR is notable during endoscopic nasal surgery. Our case indicates that CA in operating room is worth prolonged CCPR. The ideal time for ECPR implementation should not be limited within 20 minutes after CCPR.

PMID:37773828 | PMC:PMC10545381 | DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000035226

02:10

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Trimodality therapy versus perioperative chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction (Neo-AEGIS): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

02:10

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Graduated Compression Stockings in Addition to Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Inpatients

Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 27. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006096. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in surgical inpatients with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and additional graduated compression stockings (GCS) versus pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical inpatients have elevated VTE risk; recent studies cast doubt whether GCS confer additional protection against VTE, compared to pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone.

METHODS: The review followed PRISMA guidelines using a registered protocol (CRD42017062655). The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched to November 2022. Randomised trials reporting VTE rate after surgical procedures, utilising pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, with or without GCS, were included. The rates of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), VTE-related mortality were pooled via fixed and random effects.

RESULTS: In head-to-head meta-analysis, the risk of DVT for GCS and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.85 (95% CI 0.54-1.36) versus for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone (2 studies, 70 events, 2653 participants). The risk of DVT in pooled trial arms for GCS and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.54 (95% CI 0.23-1.25) versus pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone (33 trial arms, 1228 events, 14,108 participants). The risk of PE for GCS and pharmacological prophylaxis versus pharmacological prophylaxis alone was 0.71 (95% CI 0.0-30.0) (27 trial arms, 32 events, 11,472 participants). There were no between-group differences in VTE-related mortality (27 trial arms, 3 events, 12,982 participants).

CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from head-to-head meta-analysis and pooled trial arms demonstrates no additional benefit for GCS in preventing VTE and VTE-related mortality. GCS confer a risk of skin complications and an economic burden; current evidence does not support their use for surgical inpatients.

PMID:37753655 | DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006096

02:10

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Correction to: Epidemiological Study Regarding the Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients After Cancer Remission

Cardiol Ther. 2023 Sep 27. doi: 10.1007/s40119-023-00330-9. Online ahead of print.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:37755611 | DOI:10.1007/s40119-023-00330-9

C

06:05

Cardiotoxicity News

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Allogeneic mitochondrial transplantation ameliorates cardiac dysfunction due to doxorubicin: An in vivo study

Biomed Pharmacother. 2023 Oct 7;168:115651. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115651. Online ahead of print.