Translate

Search This Blog

الترجمة

bitadsx

Search This Blog

str

str

2

str

z

2

str

z

3/24/26

 



ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of preventable mortality among hospitalized patients, but appropriate risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis remain underutilized or misapplied.


OBJECTIVES: We conducted an electronic survey of US health care providers to explore attitudes, practices, and barriers related to thromboprophylaxis in adult hospitalized patients and at discharge.


RESULTS: A total of 607 US respondents completed the survey: 63.1% reported working in an academic hospital, 70.7% identified as physicians, and hospital medicine was the most frequent specialty (52.1%). The majority of respondents agreed that VTE prophylaxis is important (98.8%; 95% CI: 97.6%-99.5%) and that current measures are safe (92.6%; 95% CI: 90.2%-94.5%) and effective (93.8%; 95% CI: 91.6%-95.6%), but only half (52.0%; 95% CI: 47.9%-56.0%) believed that hospitalized patients at their institution are on appropriate VTE prophylaxis almost all the time. One-third (35.4%) reported using a risk assessment model (RAM) to determine VTE prophylaxis need; 44.9% reported unfamiliarity with RAMs. The most common recommendation for improving rates of appropriate thromboprophylaxis was to leverage technology. A majority of respondents (84.5%) do not reassess a patient's need for VTE prophylaxis at discharge, and a minority educates patients about the risk (16.2%) or symptoms (18.9%) of VTE at discharge.


CONCLUSION: Despite guideline recommendations to use RAMs, the majority of providers in our survey do not use them. A majority of respondents believed that technology could help improve VTE prophylaxis rates. A majority of respondents do not reassess the risk of VTE at discharge or educate patients about this risk of VTE at discharge.


PMID:37767063 | PMC:PMC10520566 | DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102168

21:54

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Survey on the Knowledge and Management of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT) in Haemato-Oncology Patients with Thrombocytopenia among Haematologists and Haematology Residents in Nigeria


West Afr J Med. 2023 Sep 28;40(9):956-961.


ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND: Arterial or venous thrombosis can complicate cancer, and 20% of cancer patients may develop venous thromboembolic disorders. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in some haematologic malignancies and may coexist with thrombocytopenia in those haematologic malignancies. We carried out this survey to assess the knowledge and practice of haematologists and resident doctors in haematology in Nigeria regarding the management of thrombocytopenia and cancer-associated thrombosis.


METHODS: This was a survey that was shared electronically with participants who were consultant haematologists and resident doctors in haematology in Nigeria..


RESULTS: There were 106 respondents, 70 (66%) of which were consultant haematologists. About a third (30.2%) of the respondents saw 6-10 patients with blood malignancies monthly. Fifty-seven (53.8%) of the respondents carried out risk assessment in their patients for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT); 63 (59.4%) of the respondents saw 1-2 cancer patients with thrombosis in 3 months. The most common mode of treatment was pharmacological - 94 (88%) respondents used low molecular weight heparin. The most common haematologic malignancies associated with thrombocytopenia were acute leukaemias (69; 67%). The most common decision taken by respondents was to stop anticoagulants and transfuse platelets because the most frequent concern was the risk of bleeding in this group of patients.


CONCLUSION: Many haematologists and haematology residents had a high level of awareness, knowledge and good practice regarding thrombocytopenia with CAT in haematooncology patients; however, there is a need for improved knowledge and unified protocols for treatment in line with newer management guidelines.


PMID:37767996

21:54

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Are Antibiotics the New Appendectomy?


Cureus. 2023 Sep 1;15(9):e44506. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44506. eCollection 2023 Sep.


ABSTRACT


Prior to the development of laparoscopic procedures, open appendectomy was the standard of care for the majority of appendicitis cases. Recently, studies have debated using antibiotics as a first-line treatment in uncomplicated appendicitis cases. The definition of uncomplicated appendicitis is not always clear-cut; however, with the large-scale accessibility of radiologic techniques, it is becoming increasingly easier to classify patient groups. As suggested by clinical and radiological patient data, this has raised the speculation of considering antibiotic therapy as the sole treatment modality in uncomplicated appendicitis cases. We aim to compare the options of surgery and antibiotics only in terms of efficacy, complications, and financial cost. A range of databases and search strategies were adopted, and various databases were used, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and JAMA. Collectively, 30 studies were reviewed, but only 18 were included. Efficacy rates were higher in the appendectomy group. Nevertheless, the antibiotics-only group maintained an efficacy rate greater than 70% at one-year follow-up. Risk factors that decreased the efficacy in medical management included the presence of appendicolith, neoplasm, appendiceal dilatation, peri-appendiceal fluid collection, higher mean temperature, CRP, and bilirubin. Complications were more frequent and significant in the surgery group. These included complications related to anaesthesia, surgical site infections, damage to nearby structures, and pulmonary embolism. Despite several years of follow-up and disease recurrences, higher financial costs were observed in surgically treated patients compared to the antibiotics-only group. Given the high success rates post-appendectomy for acute appendicitis over the decades, the efficacy of conservatively treated acute appendicitis raises a strong argument when choosing one of the two options. The efficacy remained consistently higher across the literature in the surgery group than in the antibiotics-only group. However, it is still arguable that antibiotics may be a preferable option given an efficacy rate of more than 70% at one year and overall higher complications associated with surgery. The argument of missing a neoplasm by avoiding surgery is valid. However, most are carcinoid neuroendocrine neoplasms with a low probability of metastasis (<5%)


PMID:37790034 | PMC:PMC10544542 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.44506

21:54

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Towards a more widespread clinical use of cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and CAVI0:Defining reference values in healthy Russians

21:54

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Impact of pegaspargase dose capping on incidence of pegaspargase-related adverse events in adults


J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2023 Sep 20:10781552231202217. doi: 10.1177/10781552231202217. Online ahead of print.


ABSTRACT


INTRODUCTION: Asparaginase derivatives are essential components of the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescent and young adult patients. However, their associated toxicities limit wider use in older populations. This study seeks to determine if the practice of capping the pegaspargase dose at 3750 units reduces the risk of related adverse events in adults.


METHODS: Adverse event data were retrospectively collected 28 days following each administration of pegaspargase in a single center. Doses were categorized as either capped (≤3750 units) (n = 57, 47.5%) or non-capped (>3750 units) (n = 63, 52.5%). The primary endpoint of this study was the composite incidence of serious pegaspargase-related adverse events, defined as grade 3 or higher.


RESULTS: Of the 120 doses administered, 47 (39.2%) were administered to patients > 39 years. For the primary endpoint, 26 doses (45.6%) in the dose capped group versus 22 doses (34.9%) in the non-dose capped group were associated with serious pegaspargase-related adverse events (p = 0.23). Isolated laboratory abnormalities accounted for all hepatotoxicity and pancreatic toxicity events, while venous thromboembolism and bleeding occurred after 8.3% and 13.3% of doses, respectively. Multivariate analysis of the primary outcome to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics found no difference between groups (OR 2.56 (0.84, 7.77, p = 0.098)).


CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of serious clinical toxicities was low in this study, particularly pegaspargase-related venous thromboembolism. This suggests that the practice of capping pegaspargase doses at 3750 units, coupled with vigilant monitoring and prophylaxis for pegaspargase-related adverse events, can allow for the inclusion of this drug in the treatment of older individuals.


PMID:37728166 | DOI:10.1177/10781552231202217

21:54

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Long-term risk of venous thromboembolism among patients with gastrointestinal non-neoplastic and neoplastic diseases: A prospective cohort study of 484 211 individuals


Am J Hematol. 2023 Sep 27. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27106. Online ahead of print.


ABSTRACT


We conducted a prospective cohort study to examine the associations of 21 gastrointestinal diseases with the risk of incident venous thromboembolism (VTE). The study included 485 936 UK Biobank participants free of baseline VTE. The gastrointestinal diseases were defined by the International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 and 10 codes with data from the nationwide inpatient data set, the primary care data set, and the cancer registries. Incident VTE cases were defined by ICD-9 and 10 codes with data from the nationwide inpatient data set. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the associations of baseline gastrointestinal diseases with incident VTE risk. During a median follow-up of 12.0 years, 13 646 incident VTE cases were diagnosed. Eleven gastrointestinal diseases (nine non-neoplastic and two neoplastic) were associated with an increased risk of incident VTE after Bonferroni corrections. The risk of VTE was >50% higher among patients with gallbladder and biliary tract cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 3.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 95% CI 1.74-5.70), pancreatic cancer (HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.65-4.91), cirrhosis (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.96-2.79), Crohn's disease (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.33-1.95), or pancreatitis (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.31-1.88) compared with individuals without each of these diseases. We observed multiplicative interactions of age, sex, and body mass index with some gastrointestinal diseases (p < .05). A more pronounced, increased risk of VTE was found among younger, female, or obese patients. The study suggests a 50% higher risk of developing VTE among patients with gallbladder and biliary tract cancer, pancreatic cancer, cirrhosis, Crohn's disease, or pancreatitis.


PMID:37753710 | DOI:10.1002/ajh.27106

21:54

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Effect of factor XI inhibition on tumor cell-induced coagulation activation


J Thromb Haemost. 2023 Sep 24:S1538-7836(23)00717-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.09.015. Online ahead of print.


ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a frequent complication in patients with malignancies. While FXI/FXIa inhibition is efficacious in preventing postoperative venous thromboembolism, its role in tumor cell-induced coagulation is less defined.


OBJECTIVES: We thus aimed to provide mechanistic insights into FXI/FXIa inhibition in tumor cell-induced coagulation activation.


METHODS: Procoagulant activity (PCA) of four different tissue factor (TF) expressing tumor cell lines was analyzed by single-stage clotting and thrombin generation assay in the presence of a FXIa inhibitor, BMS-262084 (BMS), an inhibitory FXI antibody (anti-FXI), or peak and trough concentrations of rivaroxaban or tinzaparin. Further, tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation was recorded. Recombinant human TF (rhTF) served as positive control.


RESULTS: Although BMS and anti-FXI potently inhibited FXIa amidolytic activity, both inhibitors efficiently mitigated rhTF- and tumor cell-induced fibrin clot formation and platelet aggregation only in the presence of low TF PCA. The anticoagulant effects showed an inverse correlation with the magnitude of cellular TF PCA expression. Similarly, BMS markedly interfered with tumor cell-induced thrombin generation, with the most prominent effects on peak and total thrombin. In addition, anticoagulant effects of FXIa inhibition by 10 μM BMS were in a similar range to those obtained by 600 nM rivaroxaban and 1.6 μM tinzaparin at low TF PCA levels. However, rivaroxaban and tinzaparin also exerted marked anticoagulant activity at high TF PCA levels.


CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that FXI/FXIa inhibition interferes with tumor cell-induced coagulation activation only at low TF PCA expression levels, a finding with potential implications for future in-vivo studies.


PMID:37751848 | DOI:10.1016/j.jtha.2023.09.015

21:54

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Anti-Inflammatory and Anticancer Effects of Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Malignancy


Life (Basel). 2023 Sep 10;13(9):1888. doi: 10.3390/life13091888.


No comments:

Post a Comment

اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع