2649 Diseases of the Gallbladder and Bile Ducts CHAPTER 346
Accordingly, considerable care should be taken to investigate the possible role of other factors in the production of postcholecystectomy
symptoms before attributing them to cystic duct stump syndrome.
SOD STENOSIS, SOD DYSKINESIA, AND BILIARY DYSKINESIA Symptoms of biliary colic accompanied by signs of recurrent, intermittent
biliary obstruction may be produced by acalculous cholecystopathy,
SOD stenosis, or SOD dyskinesia. SOD stenosis is thought to result
from acute or chronic inflammation of the papilla of Vater or from
glandular hyperplasia of the papillary segment. Five criteria have been
used to define SOD stenosis: (1) upper abdominal pain, usually RUQ
or epigastric; (2) abnormal liver tests; (3) dilatation of the CBD upon
MRCP or ERCP examination; (4) delayed (>45 min) drainage of contrast material from the duct; and (5) increased basal pressure of the
SOD. After exclusion of acalculous cholecystopathy, treatment consists
of endoscopic or surgical sphincteroplasty to ensure wide patency of
the distal portions of both the bile and pancreatic ducts. The greater the
number of the preceding criteria present, the greater is the likelihood
that a patient does have a degree of SOD sufficient to justify correction. The factors usually considered as indications for sphincterotomy
include (1) prolonged duration of symptoms, (2) lack of response to
symptomatic treatment, (3) presence of severe disability, and (4) the
patient’s choice of sphincterotomy over surgery (given a clear understanding on his or her part of the risks involved in both procedures).
Biliary SOD disorders are characterized by three criteria: (1) biliary
pain, (2) absence of bile duct stones or other abnormalities, and (3)
elevated liver enzymes or a dilated CBD, but not both. In this setting,
either hepatobiliary scintigraphy or SOD manometry can support the
diagnosis. Importantly, the presence of both elevated liver enzymes
and a dilated CBD should raise the question of obstruction. Proposed mechanisms to account for SOD dysfunction include spasm of
the sphincter, denervation sensitivity resulting in hypertonicity, and
abnormalities in the sequencing or frequency rates of the sphinctericcontraction waves. When thorough evaluation has failed to demonstrate another cause for the pain and when cholangiographic and
manometric criteria suggest a diagnosis of SOD dyskinesia, medical
treatment with nitrites or anticholinergics to attempt pharmacologic
relaxation of SOD has been proposed but not evaluated in detailed
studies. Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EBS) or surgical sphincterotomy may be indicated in patients who fail to respond to a 2- to
3-month trial of medical therapy, especially if SOD pressures are elevated. Approximately 45% of such patients have long-term pain relief
after EBS. EBS has become the procedure of choice for removing bile
duct stones and for other biliary and pancreatic problems.
BILE SALT–INDUCED DIARRHEA AND GASTRITIS Postcholecystectomy
patients may develop symptoms of dyspepsia, which have been attributed to duodenogastric reflux of bile. However, firm data linking these
symptoms to bile gastritis after surgical removal of the gallbladder are
lacking. Cholecystectomy induces persistent changes in gut transit, and
these changes effect a noticeable modification of bowel habits. Cholecystectomy shortens gut transit time by accelerating passage of the fecal
bolus through the colon with marked acceleration in the right colon,
thus causing an increase in colonic bile acid output and a shift in bile
acid composition toward the more diarrheagenic secondary bile acids,
that is, deoxycholic acid. Diarrhea that is severe enough, that is, three
or more watery movements per day, can be classified as postcholecystectomy diarrhea, and this occurs in 5–10% of patients undergoing
elective cholecystectomy. Treatment with bile acid–sequestering agents
such as cholestyramine or colestipol is often effective in ameliorating
troublesome diarrhea.
■ THE HYPERPLASTIC CHOLECYSTOSES
The term hyperplastic cholecystoses is used to denote a group of disorders of the gallbladder characterized by excessive proliferation of
normal tissue components.
Adenomyomatosis is characterized by a benign proliferation of
gallbladder surface epithelium with glandlike formations, extramural
sinuses, transverse strictures, and/or fundal nodule (“adenoma” or
“adenomyoma”) formation.
Cholesterolosis is characterized by abnormal deposition of lipid, especially cholesteryl esters, within macrophages in the lamina propria of
the gallbladder wall. In its diffuse form (“strawberry gallbladder”), the
gallbladder mucosa is brick red and speckled with bright yellow flecks of
lipid. The localized form shows solitary or multiple “cholesterol polyps”
studding the gallbladder wall. Cholesterol stones of the gallbladder are
found in nearly half the cases. Cholecystectomy is only indicated in adenomyomatosis or cholesterolosis when biliary symptoms are present.
The prevalence of gallbladder polyps in the adult population is
1–4% with a marked male predominance. Types of gallbladder polyps
include cholesterol polyps, adenomyomas, inflammatory polyps, and
adenomas (rare). No significant changes have been found over a 5-year
period in asymptomatic patients with gallbladder polyps <6 mm and
few changes in polyps 7–9 mm. Cholecystectomy is recommended in
symptomatic patients as well as in asymptomatic patients >50 years
whose polyps are >10 mm or associated with gallstones or polyp
growth on serial ultrasonography.
DISEASES OF THE BILE DUCTS
■ CONGENITAL ANOMALIES
Biliary Atresia and Hypoplasia Atretic and hypoplastic lesions
of the extrahepatic and large intrahepatic bile ducts are the most common biliary anomalies of clinical relevance encountered in infancy.
The clinical picture is one of severe obstructive jaundice during the
first month of life, with pale stools. When biliary atresia is suspected
on the basis of clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings, the diagnosis is confirmed by surgical exploration and operative cholangiography. Approximately 10% of cases of biliary atresia are treatable with
Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy, with the Kasai procedure (hepatic
portoenterostomy) being attempted in the remainder in an effort to
restore some bile flow. Most patients, even those having successful
biliary-enteric anastomoses, eventually develop chronic cholangitis,
extensive hepatic fibrosis, and portal hypertension.
Choledochal Cysts Cystic dilatation may involve the free portion
of the CBD, that is, choledochal cyst, or may present as diverticulum
formation in the intraduodenal segment. In the latter situation, chronic
reflux of pancreatic juice into the biliary tree can produce inflammation and stenosis of the extrahepatic bile ducts, leading to cholangitis
or biliary obstruction. Because the process may be gradual, ~50% of
patients present with onset of symptoms after age 10. The diagnosis
may be made by ultrasound, abdominal CT, MRCP, or cholangiography. Only one-third of patients show the classic triad of abdominal
pain, jaundice, and an abdominal mass. Ultrasonographic detection
of a cyst separate from the gallbladder should suggest the diagnosis
of choledochal cyst, which can be confirmed by demonstrating the
entrance of extrahepatic bile ducts into the cyst. Surgical treatment
involves excision of the “cyst” and biliary-enteric anastomosis. Patients
with choledochal cysts are at increased risk for the subsequent development of cholangiocarcinoma.
Congenital Biliary Ectasia Dilatation of intrahepatic bile ducts
may involve either the major intrahepatic radicles (Caroli’s disease),
the inter- and intralobular ducts (congenital hepatic fibrosis), or both.
In Caroli’s disease, clinical manifestations include recurrent cholangitis,
abscess formation in and around the affected ducts, and, often, brown
pigment gallstone formation within portions of ectatic intrahepatic
biliary radicles. Ultrasound, MRCP, and CT are of great diagnostic
value in demonstrating cystic dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts.
Treatment with ongoing antibiotic therapy is usually undertaken in an
effort to limit the frequency and severity of recurrent bouts of cholangitis. Progression to secondary biliary cirrhosis with portal hypertension,
extrahepatic biliary obstruction, cholangiocarcinoma, or recurrent
episodes of sepsis with hepatic abscess formation is common.
■ CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS
Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations Passage of gallstones into the CBD occurs in ~10–15% of patients with cholelithiasis.
2650 PART 10 Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
The incidence of common duct stones increases with increasing age
of the patient, so up to 25% of elderly patients may have calculi in
the common duct at the time of cholecystectomy. Undetected duct
stones are left behind in ~1–5% of cholecystectomy patients. The overwhelming majority of bile duct stones are cholesterol stones formed in
the gallbladder, which then migrate into the extrahepatic biliary tree
through the cystic duct. Primary calculi arising de novo in the ducts
are usually brown pigment stones developing in patients with (1) hepatobiliary parasitism or chronic, recurrent cholangitis; (2) congenital
anomalies of the bile ducts (especially Caroli’s disease); (3) dilated,
sclerosed, or strictured ducts; or (4) an MDR3 (ABCB4) gene defect
leading to impaired biliary phospholipids secretion (low phospholipid–
associated cholesterol cholelithiasis). Common duct stones may remain
asymptomatic for years, may pass spontaneously into the duodenum,
or (most often) may present with biliary colic or a complication.
Complications • CHOLANGITIS Cholangitis may be acute or
chronic, and symptoms result from inflammation, which usually is
caused by at least partial obstruction to the flow of bile. Bacteria are
present on bile culture in ~75% of patients with acute cholangitis early
in the symptomatic course. The characteristic presentation of acute
cholangitis involves biliary pain, jaundice, and spiking fevers with chills
(Charcot’s triad). Blood cultures are frequently positive, and leukocytosis is typical. Nonsuppurative acute cholangitis is most common and
may respond relatively rapidly to supportive measures and to treatment
with antibiotics. In suppurative acute cholangitis, however, the presence
of pus under pressure in a completely obstructed ductal system leads
to symptoms of severe toxicity—mental confusion, bacteremia, and
septic shock. Response to antibiotics alone in this setting is relatively
poor, multiple hepatic abscesses are often present, and the mortality
rate approaches 100% unless prompt endoscopic or surgical relief of the
obstruction and drainage of infected bile are carried out. Endoscopic
management of bacterial cholangitis is as effective as surgical intervention. ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy is safe and the preferred
initial procedure for both establishing a definitive diagnosis and providing effective therapy.
OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE Gradual obstruction of the CBD over a
period of weeks or months usually leads to initial manifestations of
jaundice or pruritus without associated symptoms of biliary colic or
cholangitis. Painless jaundice may occur in patients with choledocholithiasis but is much more characteristic of biliary obstruction secondary
to malignancy of the head of the pancreas, bile ducts, or ampulla of
Vater.
In patients whose obstruction is secondary to choledocholithiasis,
associated chronic calculous cholecystitis is very common, and the
gallbladder in this setting may be unable to distend. The absence of
a palpable gallbladder in most patients with biliary obstruction from
duct stones is the basis for Courvoisier’s law, that is, that the presence
of a palpably enlarged gallbladder suggests that the biliary obstruction
is secondary to an underlying malignancy rather than to calculous
disease. Biliary obstruction causes progressive dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts as intrabiliary pressures rise. Hepatic bile flow is
suppressed, and reabsorption and regurgitation of conjugated bilirubin
into the bloodstream lead to jaundice accompanied by dark urine (bilirubinuria) and light-colored (acholic) stools.
CBD stones should be suspected in any patient with cholecystitis
whose serum bilirubin level is >85.5 μmol/L (5 mg/dL). The maximum
bilirubin level is seldom >256.5 μmol/L (15.0 mg/dL) in patients with
choledocholithiasis unless concomitant hepatic or renal disease or
another factor leading to marked hyperbilirubinemia exists. Serum
bilirubin levels ≥342.0 μmol/L (20 mg/dL) should suggest the possibility of neoplastic obstruction. The serum alkaline phosphatase level
is almost always elevated in biliary obstruction. A rise in alkaline
phosphatase often precedes clinical jaundice and may be the only
abnormality in routine liver function tests. There may be a two- to
tenfold elevation of serum aminotransferases, especially in association
with acute obstruction. Following relief of the obstructing process,
serum aminotransferase elevations usually return rapidly to normal,
while the serum bilirubin level may take 1–2 weeks to return to normal.
The alkaline phosphatase level usually falls slowly, lagging behind the
decrease in serum bilirubin.
PANCREATITIS The most common associated entity discovered in
patients with nonalcoholic acute pancreatitis is biliary tract disease.
Biochemical evidence of pancreatic inflammation complicates acute
cholecystitis in 15% of cases and choledocholithiasis in >30%, and the
common factor appears to be the passage of gallstones through the
common duct. Coexisting pancreatitis should be suspected in patients
with symptoms of cholecystitis who develop (1) back pain or pain to
the left of the abdominal midline, (2) prolonged vomiting with paralytic ileus, or (3) a pleural effusion, especially on the left side. Surgical
treatment of gallstone disease is usually associated with resolution of
the pancreatitis.
SECONDARY BILIARY CIRRHOSIS Secondary biliary cirrhosis may
complicate prolonged or intermittent duct obstruction with or without recurrent cholangitis. Although this complication may be seen
in patients with choledocholithiasis, it is more common in cases of
prolonged obstruction from stricture or neoplasm. Once established,
secondary biliary cirrhosis may be progressive even after correction of
the obstructing process, and increasingly severe hepatic cirrhosis may
lead to portal hypertension or to hepatic failure and death. Prolonged
biliary obstruction may also be associated with clinically relevant deficiencies of the fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K.
Diagnosis and Treatment The diagnosis of choledocholithiasis
is made by cholangiography (Table 346-3), either preoperatively by
endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram (ERC) (Fig. 346-2C) or MRCP
or intraoperatively at the time of cholecystectomy. As many as 15% of
patients undergoing cholecystectomy will prove to have CBD stones.
When CBD stones are suspected prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, preoperative ERCP with endoscopic papillotomy and stone
extraction is the preferred approach. It not only provides stone clearance but also defines the anatomy of the biliary tree in relationship to
the cystic duct. CBD stones should be suspected in gallstone patients
who have any of the following risk factors: (1) a history of jaundice or
pancreatitis, (2) abnormal tests of liver function, and (3) ultrasonographic or MRCP evidence of a dilated CBD or stones in the duct.
Alternatively, if intraoperative cholangiography reveals retained stones,
postoperative ERCP can be carried out. The need for preoperative
ERCP is expected to decrease further as laparoscopic techniques for
bile duct exploration improve.
The widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ERCP
has decreased the incidence of complicated biliary tract disease and
the need for choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage of the bile
ducts. EBS followed by spontaneous passage or stone extraction is the
treatment of choice in the management of patients with common duct
stones, especially in elderly or poor-risk patients.
■ TRAUMA, STRICTURES, AND HEMOBILIA
Most benign strictures of the extrahepatic bile ducts result from surgical
trauma and occur in about 1 in 500 cholecystectomies. Strictures may
present with bile leak or abscess formation in the immediate postoperative period or with biliary obstruction or cholangitis as long as 2 years
or more following the inciting trauma. The diagnosis is established by
percutaneous or endoscopic cholangiography. Endoscopic brushing of
biliary strictures may be helpful in establishing the nature of the lesion
and is more accurate than bile cytology alone. When positive exfoliative
cytology is obtained, the diagnosis of a neoplastic stricture is established. This procedure is especially important in patients with primary
sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) who are predisposed to the development of
cholangiocarcinomas. Successful operative correction of non-PSC bile
duct strictures by a skillful surgeon with duct-to-bowel anastomosis is
usually possible, although mortality rates from surgical complications,
recurrent cholangitis, or secondary biliary cirrhosis are high.
Hemobilia may follow traumatic or operative injury to the liver or
bile ducts, intraductal rupture of a hepatic abscess or aneurysm of the
hepatic artery, biliary or hepatic tumor hemorrhage, or mechanical
complications of choledocholithiasis or hepatobiliary parasitism. Diagnostic procedures such as liver biopsy, PTC, and transhepatic biliary
2651 Diseases of the Gallbladder and Bile Ducts CHAPTER 346
drainage catheter placement may also be complicated by hemobilia.
Patients often present with a classic triad of biliary pain, obstructive
jaundice, and melena or occult blood in the stools. The diagnosis is
sometimes made by cholangiographic evidence of blood clot in the
biliary tree, but selective angiographic verification may be required.
Although minor episodes of hemobilia may resolve without intervention, arteriography and transcatheter embolization or surgical ligation
of the bleeding vessel may be required.
■ EXTRINSIC COMPRESSION OF THE BILE DUCTS
Partial or complete biliary obstruction may be produced by extrinsic
compression of the ducts. The most common cause of this form of
obstructive jaundice is carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Biliary
obstruction may also occur as a complication of either acute or chronic
pancreatitis or involvement of lymph nodes in the porta hepatis by
lymphoma or metastatic carcinoma. The latter should be distinguished
from cholestasis resulting from massive replacement of the liver by
tumor.
■ HEPATOBILIARY PARASITISM
Infestation of the biliary tract by adult helminths or their ova may produce a chronic, recurrent pyogenic cholangitis with or without multiple
hepatic abscesses, ductal stones, or biliary obstruction. This condition
is relatively rare but does occur in inhabitants of southern China and
TABLE 346-3 Diagnostic Evaluation of the Bile Ducts
DIAGNOSTIC ADVANTAGES DIAGNOSTIC LIMITATIONS CONTRAINDICATIONS COMPLICATIONS COMMENT
Ultrasound
Rapid
Simultaneous scanning of GB, liver,
bile ducts, pancreas
Accurate identification of dilated
bile ducts
Not limited by jaundice, pregnancy
Guidance for fine-needle biopsy
Bowel gas
Massive obesity
Ascites
Barium
Partial bile duct obstruction
Poor visualization of distal CBD
None None Initial procedure of choice in
investigating possible biliary tract
obstruction
Computed Tomography
Simultaneous scanning of GB, liver,
bile ducts, pancreas
Accurate identification of dilated
bile ducts, masses
Not limited by jaundice, gas,
obesity, ascites
High-resolution image
Guidance for fine-needle biopsy
Extreme cachexia
Movement artifact
Ileus
Partial bile duct obstruction
Pregnancy Reaction to iodinated contrast,
if used
Indicated for evaluation of
hepatic or pancreatic masses or
for assessing for complications
related to gallstones
(pancreatitis)
Procedure of choice in
investigating possible biliary
obstruction if diagnostic
limitations limit US
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography
Noninvasive modality for
visualizing pancreatic and biliary
ducts
Has excellent sensitivity for bile
duct dilatation, biliary stricture,
and intraductal abnormalities
Can identify pancreatic duct
dilatation or stricture, pancreatic
duct stenosis, and pancreas
divisum
Cannot offer therapeutic
intervention
High cost
Claustrophobia
Certain metals (iron)
None First choice to assess for
choledocholithiasis given
comparable sensitivity and
specificity to ERCP
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Simultaneous pancreatography
Best visualization of distal biliary
tract
Bile or pancreatic cytology
Endoscopic sphincterotomy and
stone removal
Biliary manometry
Gastroduodenal obstruction
Roux-en-Y biliary-enteric
anastomosis
Pregnancy
Acute pancreatitis
Severe cardiopulmonary
disease
Pancreatitis
Cholangitis, sepsis
Infected pancreatic pseudocyst
Perforation (rare)
Hypoxemia, aspiration
Cholangiogram of choice if there
is believed to be a need for
intervention:
Diagnosed or high clinical
probability of choledocholithiasis
Biliary stricture requiring
sampling and stenting
Need for sphincterotomy such as
Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiogram
Best when bile ducts dilated
Best visualization of proximal
biliary tract
May be used to obtain bile
cytology/culture
Allows for percutaneous
transhepatic drainage
Nondilated or sclerosed ducts Pregnancy
Uncorrectable
coagulopathy
Massive ascites
Hepatic abscess
Bleeding
Hemobilia
Bile peritonitis
Bacteremia, sepsis
Indicated for the drainage of
obstructed and infected ducts
when ERCP is contraindicated
or failed
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Most sensitive method to detect
ampullary stones and exclude
pathology in the head of the
pancreas
Excellent for detecting
choledocholithiasis
Abbreviations: CBD, common bile duct; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; GB, gallbladder; US, hepatobiliary ultrasound.
2652 PART 10 Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
elsewhere in Southeast Asia. The organisms most commonly involved
are trematodes or flukes, including Clonorchis sinensis, Opisthorchis
viverrini or Opisthorchis felineus, and Fasciola hepatica. The biliary
tract also may be involved by intraductal migration of adult Ascaris
lumbricoides from the duodenum or by intrabiliary rupture of hydatid
cysts of the liver produced by Echinococcus spp. The diagnosis is made
by cholangiography and the presence of characteristic ova on stool
examination. When obstruction is present, the treatment of choice is
laparotomy under antibiotic coverage, with common duct exploration
and a biliary drainage procedure.
■ SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS
PSC is characterized by a progressive, inflammatory, sclerosing, and
obliterative process affecting the extrahepatic and/or the intrahepatic
bile ducts. PSC is strongly associated with inflammatory bowel disease,
especially ulcerative colitis.
Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)–associated cholangitis is a biliary disease of unknown etiology that presents with biochemical and cholangiographic features indistinguishable from PSC, is often associated with
autoimmune pancreatitis and other fibrosing conditions, and is characterized by elevated serum IgG4 and infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma
cells in bile ducts and liver tissue. All patients diagnosed with sclerosing cholangitis should have a serum IgG4 level checked to rule out
IgG4 disease as a cause of secondary sclerosing cholangitis, particularly
if they do not have inflammatory bowel disease. Glucocorticoids are
the initial treatment of choice. Relapse is common after steroid withdrawal, especially with proximal strictures. Long-term treatment with
glucocorticoids and/or steroid-sparing agents such as azathioprine may
be needed after relapse or for inadequate response (Chap. 348).
Patients with PSC often present with signs and symptoms of
chronic or intermittent biliary obstruction: RUQ abdominal pain,
pruritus, jaundice, or acute cholangitis. Late in the course, complete
biliary obstruction, secondary biliary cirrhosis, hepatic failure, or
portal hypertension with bleeding varices may occur. The diagnosis is
established by finding multifocal, diffusely distributed strictures with
intervening segments of normal or dilated ducts, producing a beaded
appearance on cholangiography (Fig. 346-2D). The cholangiographic
techniques of choice in suspected cases are MRCP and ERCP. When
a diagnosis of sclerosing cholangitis has been established, causes of
secondary sclerosing should be considered. Patients with PSC should
undergo testing for associated diseases, especially inflammatory bowel
disease, if that diagnosis has not already been established.
Small duct PSC is defined by the presence of chronic cholestasis and
hepatic histology consistent with PSC in a patient with IBD, but with
normal findings on cholangiography. Small duct PSC is found in ~5%
of patients with PSC and may represent an earlier stage of PSC associated with a significantly better long-term prognosis. However, such
patients may progress to classic PSC and/or end-stage liver disease with
consequent necessity of liver transplantation.
In patients with AIDS, cholangiopancreatography may demonstrate a broad range of biliary tract changes as well as pancreatic duct
obstruction and occasionally pancreatitis (Chap. 202). Further, biliary
tract lesions in AIDS include infection and cholangiopancreatographic
changes of sclerosing cholangitis. Changes noted include (1) diffuse
involvement of intrahepatic bile ducts alone, (2) involvement of both
intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts, (3) ampullary stenosis, (4) stricture
of the intrapancreatic portion of the CBD, and (5) pancreatic duct
involvement. Associated infectious organisms include Cryptosporidium, Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare, cytomegalovirus, Microsporidia, and Isospora. ERCP sphincterotomy can provide significant pain
reduction in patients with AIDS-associated papillary stenosis.
TREATMENT
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
There is no proven medical therapy for PSC. Therapy to treat pruritus associated with PSC includes cholestyramine, rifampin, and
naltrexone. Antibiotics are useful when bacterial cholangitis complicates the clinical picture. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation
Section 4 Disorders of the Pancreas
347
■ GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Globally, pancreatic disorders, including acute and chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cysts, and pancreatic cancer, are challenging to manage
and associated with a high burden on health care resources. The relationships between these diseases continues to be poorly understood,
but there is encouraging progress. Acute pancreatitis is one of the most
common reasons for hospitalizations in gastroenterology, and there is
increasing evidence of long-term sequelae including diabetes, exocrine
pancreas insufficiency, and pancreas cancer. Chronic pancreatitis, an
irreversible disease of the pancreas, is associated with poor quality of
life, largely related to abdominal pain, and associated exocrine insufficiency. Pancreatic cysts, mostly incidental, are increasingly detected on
cross-sectional abdominal imaging studies. Although a small number
and specific types of pancreatic cysts can progress to pancreatic cancer,
diagnostic uncertainty can introduce unwanted anxiety to patients
and treating physicians. Meanwhile, with persistently high mortality
rates, the incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is increasing and is
the seventh leading cause of cancer-related death in the industrialized
world and the third most common in the United States.
As emphasized in Chap. 348, the etiologies and clinical manifestations of pancreatitis are quite varied. Although it is well-appreciated
that acute pancreatitis is frequently secondary to biliary tract disease
and alcohol abuse, it can also be caused by drugs, genetic mutations, and trauma. In ~30% of patients with acute pancreatitis and
25–40% of patients with chronic pancreatitis, the etiology is initially
unexplained.
The global pooled incidence of acute pancreatitis is ~33.7 cases
(95% confidence interval [CI], 23.3–48.8) with 1.16 deaths (95%
CI, 0.85–1.6) per 100,000 person-years. The global pooled incidence
of chronic pancreatitis is ~9.6 cases (95% CI, 7.9–11.8) with 0.09
attributable deaths (95% CI, 0.02–0.5) per 100,000 person-years. In the
Approach to the Patient
with Pancreatic Disease
Somashekar G. Krishna,
Darwin L. Conwell, Phil A. Hart
may be used as initial therapy to help prevent the loss of bone mass
frequently seen in patients with chronic cholestasis. In cases where
high-grade biliary obstruction (dominant strictures) has occurred,
balloon dilatation is preferred over stenting due to the higher complication rate associated with stenting including pancreatitis and
cholangitis. Only rarely is surgical intervention indicated. PSC is a
progressive disease with a median survival of 12–18 years following
the diagnosis, regardless of therapy. Four variables (age, serum
bilirubin level, histologic stage, and splenomegaly) predict survival
in patients with PSC and serve as the basis for a risk score. PSC is a
common indication for liver transplantation.
■ FURTHER READING
Baron TH et al: Interventional approaches to gallbladder disease.
N Engl J Med 373:357, 2015.
Lindor K et al: American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) guidelines: Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 51:660, 2010.
Ryl JK et al: Clinical features of acute acalculous cholecystitis. J Clin
Gastroenterol 36:166, 2003.
Strasberg S: Clinical practice. Acute calculous cholecystitis. N Engl J
Med 358:2804, 2008.
2653Approach to the Patient with Pancreatic Disease CHAPTER 347
United States, the number of patients admitted to the hospital with
acute pancreatitis is increasing, with estimated rates of almost 300,000
annually, whereas the number of patients hospitalized for chronic pancreatitis is decreasing, with recent estimates of ~13,000 admissions per
year. Chronic pancreatitis has an annual prevalence of 42–73 cases per
100,000 adults in the United States, although higher prevalence rates
(0.04–5%) have been noted among adults at autopsy. Together, acute
and chronic pancreatic disease costs an estimated $3 billion annually
in health care expenditures.
The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is generally clearly defined
based on a combination of laboratory, imaging, and clinical symptoms. The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis, especially in mild disease,
is hampered by the relative inaccessibility of the pancreas to direct
examination and the nonspecificity of the abdominal pain associated
with chronic pancreatitis. Many patients with chronic pancreatitis do
not have elevated blood amylase or lipase levels. Some patients with
chronic pancreatitis develop signs and symptoms of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), and thus, objective evidence for pancreatic
disease can be demonstrated. However, there is a very large reservoir
of pancreatic exocrine function. More than 90% of the pancreas must
be damaged before maldigestion of fat and protein is manifested.
Noninvasive, indirect tests of pancreatic exocrine function (e.g., fecal
elastase) are much more likely to give abnormal results in patients
with obvious advanced pancreatic disease (i.e., pancreatic calcification,
steatorrhea, or diabetes mellitus) than in patients with occult disease.
Invasive, direct tests of pancreatic secretory function (e.g., secretin
stimulation test) are the most sensitive and specific tests to detect early
chronic pancreatic disease when imaging is equivocal or normal.
The increasing utilization of cross-sectional imaging modalities
with their improved resolution has contributed to a high prevalence
(2–5% with computed tomography [CT] scans, 20–30% with magnetic
resonance imaging [MRI]) of incidentally detected pancreatic cysts.
The most common cyst type encountered is an intraductal papillary
mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), which is classified as a precancerous
mucinous cyst. In the absence of high-risk features, radiographic
surveillance is typically recommended (Fig. 347-1). Mucinous cystic
neoplasms (MCNs) are a less commonly encountered mucinous cyst.
Among the neoplastic cysts, serous cystadenomas have a negligible
risk of progression to malignancy. Other infrequent neoplastic cysts
include neuroendocrine tumors and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms.
The most commonly encountered benign cyst is a pseudocyst, which
can occur in patients with a history of acute or chronic pancreatitis.
It is often difficult to accurately predict the risk of malignant transformation of precancerous pancreatic cysts, and there is an increasing
number of patients on imaging surveillance protocols burdening the
health care systems in the industrialized world.
A B C
FIGURE 347-1 A. Side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography [MRCP]).
T2-weighted MRCP image demonstrates a dominant, lobulated, hyperintense cystic structure (arrow) within the posterior body of the pancreas. The pancreatic duct
upstream from the cyst is dilated and irregular. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration of cyst fluid were consistent with a mucinous cyst. Surgical histopathology
revealed an infiltrating moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, 0.3 cm, arising in a background of an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). B. Mucinous
cystic neoplasm (computed tomography [CT] scan). In the tail of the pancreas, there is a well-circumscribed hypodense cyst (arrow) without any nodular enhancing
components. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration of cyst fluid were suggestive of a mucinous cyst. Surgical histopathology revealed a mucinous cystic
neoplasm (3.4 cm) with low-grade dysplasia. The stroma of the cyst demonstrated diffuse positivity for progesterone receptor and focal positivity for CD10 (ovarian stroma),
confirming the diagnosis. C. Serous cystadenoma (MRI). A lobulated microcystic cyst (arrow) is observed in the tail of the pancreas. Neither a communication with the main
pancreatic duct nor intracystic soft tissue enhancing nodular components were observed. However, the cyst continued to increase in size and a distal pancreatectomy
was performed. Histopathology revealed a serous microcystic adenoma. (Courtesy of Dr. Z.K. Shah, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center; with permission.)
■ TESTS USEFUL IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF
PANCREATIC DISEASE
Several tests are of value in the evaluation of pancreatic disease. Examples of specific tests and their usefulness in the diagnosis of acute and
chronic pancreatitis are summarized in Table 347-1 and Fig. 347-2.
At some institutions, pancreatic function tests are available and performed if the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis remains a possibility
after noninvasive tests (i.e., ultrasound, CT Scan, MRI with magnetic
resonance cholangiopancreatography [MRCP]) or invasive tests (i.e.,
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP], endoscopic
ultrasound [EUS]) have given normal or inconclusive results. In this
regard, tests using direct stimulation of the pancreas with secretin are
the most sensitive.
Pancreatic Enzymes in Body Fluids The serum amylase and
lipase levels are widely used as screening tests for acute pancreatitis
in the patient with acute abdominal pain or back pain. Lipase is very
specific for the pancreas, and values greater than three times the upper
limit of normal (3× ULN) in combination with epigastric pain strongly
suggest the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. In acute pancreatitis, the
serum amylase and lipase are usually elevated within 24 h of onset and
remain so for 3–7 days. Levels usually return to normal within 7 days
unless there is pancreatic ductal disruption, ductal obstruction, or
pseudocyst formation. Approximately 85% of patients with acute pancreatitis have threefold or greater elevated serum lipase and amylase
levels. The values may be normal if (1) there is a delay (2–5 days) before
blood samples are obtained, (2) the underlying disorder is chronic
pancreatitis rather than acute pancreatitis, or (3) hypertriglyceridemia
is present. Patients with hypertriglyceridemia and acute pancreatitis
have been found to have spuriously low levels of amylase and perhaps
lipase activity. In the absence of objective evidence of pancreatitis by
abdominal ultrasound, contrast-enhanced CT scan, MRI with MRCP,
or EUS, mild to moderate elevations of amylase and/or lipase are not
helpful in making a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.
It should be noted that the serum amylase can be elevated in other
conditions (Table 347-2), in part because the enzyme is found in many
organs. In addition to the pancreas and salivary glands, small quantities
of amylase are found in the tissues of the fallopian tubes, lung, thyroid,
and tonsils and can be produced by various tumors (carcinomas of the
lung, esophagus, breast, and ovary). Isoamylase determinations do not
accurately distinguish elevated blood amylase levels from pancreatic
or nonpancreatic sources. In patients with unexplained hyperamylasemia, the measurement of macroamylase can avoid numerous tests
in patients with this rare disorder.
Elevation of ascitic fluid amylase occurs in acute pancreatitis as well
as in (1) ascites due to disruption of the main pancreatic duct or a leaking
pseudocyst and (2) other abdominal disorders that simulate pancreatitis
2654 PART 10 Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
(e.g., intestinal obstruction, intestinal infarction, or perforated peptic
ulcer). Elevation of pleural fluid amylase can occur in acute pancreatitis,
chronic pancreatitis, carcinoma of the lung, and esophageal perforation.
Lipase is the single best enzyme to measure for the diagnosis of acute
pancreatitis. It is important to acknowledge that levels are often mildly
elevated in the setting of renal disease, so determining whether a patient
with renal failure and abdominal pain has pancreatitis remains a challenging clinical problem. One study found that serum amylase levels
were elevated in patients with renal dysfunction only when creatinine
clearance was <0.8 mL/s (<50 mL/min). In such patients, the serum
TABLE 347-1 Tests Useful in the Diagnosis of Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Neoplasms
TEST PRINCIPLE COMMENT
Pancreatic Enzymes in Body Fluids
Serum lipase Pancreatic inflammation leads to increased serum enzyme
levels
Enzyme measurement of choice for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis;
increased specificity if the level is more than three times the upper limit
of normal (3× ULN)
Amylase
1. Serum Pancreatic inflammation leads to increased serum enzyme
levels
Simple; increased specificity if the level is >3× ULN; may be falsely
normal in patients with hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis
2. Urine Renal clearance of amylase is increased in acute
pancreatitis
Infrequently used
3. Ascitic fluid Disruption of gland or main pancreatic duct leads to
increased amylase concentration
Can help establish source of ascites; false positives occur with intestinal
obstruction and perforated ulcer; can also measure lipase
4. Pleural fluid Exudative pleural effusion with pancreatitis False positives occur with carcinoma of the lung and esophageal
perforation
Studies Pertaining to Pancreatic Structure
Radiologic and radionuclide tests
1. Plain film of the abdomen or
upper gastrointestinal x-rays
Can demonstrate large calcifications in chronic
pancreatitis
Infrequently used
2. Ultrasonography (US) Can provide limited information on edema, inflammation,
calcification, pseudocysts, and mass lesions
Simple, noninvasive; sequential studies quite feasible; useful in diagnosis
of gallstones; pancreas visualization limited by interference from
overlying bowel gas
3. Computed tomography
(CT) scan
Permits detailed visualization of pancreas and
surrounding structures, pancreatic fluid collection,
pseudocyst; assessment of necrosis or interstitial disease
Useful in the diagnosis of pancreatic calcification, dilated pancreatic
ducts, and pancreatic tumors; may not be able to distinguish between
inflammatory and neoplastic mass lesions; multiphasic CT scans are the
preferred imaging modality for staging pancreatic cancer; IV contrast is
needed for characterization of most features
4. Magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) and
cholangiopancreatography
(MRCP)
Permits noninvasive detailed evaluation of the pancreatic
parenchyma, biliary and pancreatic ducts, adjacent soft
tissues, and vascular structures.
Has mostly replaced ERCP for diagnostic assessment of the pancreatic
duct; more sensitive than CT scan for detection of mild pancreatitis,
necrosis, choledocholithiasis, pancreatic ductal abnormalities, and
cystic neoplasms; no exposure to ionizing radiation
5. Endoscopic ultrasonography
(EUS) and fine-needle
aspiration/biopsy (FNA/B)
High-frequency transducer used with EUS produces veryhigh-resolution images permitting focused evaluation of
pancreatic parenchyma and biliary and pancreatic ducts,
and FNA/B provides targeted tissue acquisition
Can be used to assess gallstones, choledocholithiasis, chronic
pancreatitis, pancreatic masses, and cystic neoplasms; FNA/B facilitates
diagnostic and therapeutic management of pancreatic diseases
6. Endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography
(ERCP)
Cannulation of pancreatic and/or common bile duct
permits visualization of pancreaticobiliary ductal system
Primarily a therapeutic procedure; invasive with risks for iatrogenic
complications
Tests of Exocrine Pancreatic Function
Direct stimulation of the pancreas with analysis of duodenal contents
1. Secretin test Secretin leads to increased output of pancreatic juice and
HCO3
–
; pancreatic secretory response is related to the
functional mass of pancreatic tissue; involves duodenal
intubation and fluoroscopic placement of gastroduodenal
tube
Sensitive to detect occult disease; poorly defined normal enzyme
response; large secretory reserve capacity of the pancreas; rarely
performed
2. Endoscopic pancreatic
function test (ePFT)
Secretin-stimulated collection of pancreatic juice
performed during upper endoscopy; replaces need for
tube placement in the duodenum
Sensitive to detect occult disease; high negative predictive value for
chronic pancreatitis; requires sedation
3. EUS-ePFT Combines endosonographic evaluation of the pancreas
and endoscopic collection of pancreatic juice
Single endoscopic evaluation of pancreatic structure and function
4. Secretin-stimulated MRCP Combines imaging evaluation of the pancreas and a
semiquantitative estimation of pancreatic juice output in
the duodenum
Improved visualization of pancreatic ductal anatomy; functional
evaluation is less accurate than ePFT; noninvasive
Measurement of intraluminal digestion products
1. Stool fat determination Lack of lipolytic enzymes brings about impaired fat
digestion; quantitative 72-h stool collection and estimation
are more reliable than qualitative analysis of a random
stool sample
Reliable reference standard for defining severity of fat malabsorption;
does not distinguish between pancreatic and nonpancreatic cause of
malabsorption
Measurement of pancreatic enzymes in feces
1. Fecal elastase Pancreatic secretion of proteolytic enzymes; not degraded
in intestine
Diagnostic accuracy is highest when the pretest probability is high
and the value is <100 μg/g; false positives will occur in patients with
nonformed stools
2655Approach to the Patient with Pancreatic Disease CHAPTER
amylase level was invariably <500 IU/L in the absence of objective
347
evidence of acute pancreatitis. In that study, serum lipase and trypsin
levels paralleled serum amylase values. With these limitations in mind,
the recommended screening test for acute pancreatitis in renal disease
is serum lipase, but a high index of clinical suspicion is needed based on
symptoms. Elevations in serum lipase >3× ULN due to nonpancreatic
etiology can be observed in hepatobiliary or gastrointestinal malignancies, septicemia, liver cirrhosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, severe
head injury, chronic alcoholism, diabetes mellitus, and post-ERCP
without any associated evidence of pancreatitis.
Studies Pertaining to Pancreatic Structure • RADIOLOGIC
TESTS Plain films of the abdomen rarely provide useful information related to pancreatic disease and have been superseded by more
detailed imaging studies (ultrasound, EUS, CT, and MRI with MRCP).
Ultrasonography (US) can provide important information in the
initial emergency ward evaluation of patients with acute pancreatitis,
chronic pancreatitis, pseudocysts, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Sonographic changes can indicate the presence of edema, inflammation, and calcification (not obvious on plain films of the abdomen),
as well as gallstones, biliary dilation, pseudocysts, and mass lesions. In
acute pancreatitis, the pancreas is characteristically enlarged. In pancreatic pseudocyst, the usual appearance is primarily that of a smooth,
round fluid collection. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma distorts the usual
landmarks, and mass lesions >3.0 cm are usually detected as localized,
solid lesions. US is often the initial investigation for most patients with
suspected pancreatic disease. However, obesity and excess intestinal
bowel gas can interfere with pancreatic imaging, limiting its sensitivity.
CT with intravenous contrast is the best imaging study for the
assessment of complications of acute and chronic pancreatitis. It is
especially useful in the detection of pancreatic and peripancreatic
acute fluid collections, fluid-containing lesions such as pseudocysts,
walled-off necrosis (see Chap. 348, Figs. 348-1, 348-2, and 348-4),
and pancreatic neoplasms. Acute pancreatitis is characterized by (1)
enlargement of the pancreas, (2) distortion of the pancreatic contour
with peripancreatic stranding of adjacent fat tissue, and/or (3) the
presence of pancreatic fluid that has a different attenuation coefficient than normal pancreas. When possible, CT scans should ideally
be performed with oral and intravenous contrast to detect areas of
pancreatic necrosis. The major benefit of CT scan in acute pancreatitis
is the diagnosis of pancreatic necrosis in patients not responding to
conservative management within 72 h. It may take 48–72 h to develop
perfusion defects indicative of pancreatic necrosis. Therefore, if acute
pancreatitis is confirmed with serology and physical examination findings, CT scan in the first 3 days is not recommended to minimize risk
of contrast-induced nephropathy and unnecessary health care costs.
Improved imaging technology and increased resolution are facilitated
by multiphasic CT scans using multidetector technology (MDCT)
in which a pancreas protocol consisting of dual-phase scanning with
intravenous contrast is utilized for the detection and staging of pancreatic cancers. While the sensitivity of MDCT for detecting smaller
(≤2 cm) lesions is lower, the reported overall sensitivity for pancreatic
cancers is 76–97%. The contraindications to using intravenous contrast
include renal failure (serum creatinine >2 mg/dL) and a history of
severe allergic reaction to iodinated contrast agents. In situations where
EUS is not available, CT-guided percutaneous aspiration or biopsy of a
pancreatic mass can be performed. Prior to the major advance of EUSguided fine-needle aspiration (FNA), CT-guided biopsy was utilized in
the preceding decades and is regarded as a safe procedure.
MRI and MRCP provide excellent imaging of the bile duct, pancreatic duct, and pancreas parenchyma in both acute pancreatitis and
chronic pancreatitis. MRI is better than transabdominal US and CT
scans and comparable to EUS in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
Similar to CT, MRI can evaluate for the severity of acute pancreatitis.
Moreover, T2-weighted MRI of fluid collections can differentiate
necrotic debris from fluid in suspected walled-off necrosis, and T1
imaging can diagnose hemorrhage in suspected pseudoaneurysm
rupture. In chronic pancreatitis, secretin-enhanced MRCP is a method
to enhance the evaluation of major and minor ductal changes. While
imaging is comparable to CT for evaluating pancreatic mass lesions,
MRI with MRCP is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating
pancreatic cystic lesions. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis has been
described in patients with chronic renal failure following exposure to
the gadolinium contrast, but incidence rates are extraordinarily low
with contemporary contrast agents.
EUS produces high-resolution images of the bile duct, pancreatic parenchyma, and pancreatic duct with a transducer fixed to an
Step 1
• Clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of chronic pancreatic disease: abdominal pain,
nausea, weight loss, steatorrhea, malabsorption, history of alcohol abuse, recurrent
pancreatitis, fatty-food intolerance
• Perform history, physical examination, review of laboratory studies; consider fecal elastase
measurement
• Contrast-enhanced CT scan
• CP diagnostic criteria: calcifications in combination with atrophy and/or dilated duct
• Diagnostic criteria met; no further imaging needed
• Inconclusive or nondiagnostic results; continue to step 2
• MRI and MRCP, with or without secretin enhancement (sMRCP)
• CP diagnostic criteria: Cambridge class III,a dilated duct, atrophy of gland, filling
defects in duct suggestive of stones
• Diagnostic criteria met; no further imaging needed
• Inconclusive or nondiagnostic results; continue to step 3
• Pancreas function test (with secretin)—endoscopic (ePFT) collection method
preferred; consider combining ePFT with EUS
• CP diagnostic criteria: peak [bicarbonate] <80 mEq/L
• Diagnostic criteria met; no further imaging needed
• Inconclusive or nondiagnostic results require monitoring of signs and symptoms and repeat
testing in 6 months–1 year
• EUS with quantification of parenchymal and ductal criteria
• CP diagnostic criteria: ≥5 EUS CP criteria
• Diagnostic criteria met; no further imaging needed
• Inconclusive or nondiagnostic results; continue to step 4
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
FIGURE 347-2 A stepwise diagnostic approach to the patient with suspected chronic pancreatitis (CP). Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) with secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (sMRCP/MRCP) are appropriate diagnostic alternatives to endoscopic
retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). CT, computed tomography; ePFT, endoscopic pancreas function test. a
Cambridge classification of pancreatic duct findings:
class 0: normal—visualization of complete normal ductal anatomy; class I: equivocal—normal main duct, 1–3 abnormal side branches; class II: mild—normal main duct,
>3 abnormal side branches; class III—dilated and irregular main duct, >3 abnormal side branches, small (<10 mm) cysts; class IV—irregular main duct, intraductal calculi,
strictures, obstruction with dilation, or large (> 10 mm) cysts.
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع