Search This Blog

Translate

خلفيات وصور / wallpapers and pictures images / fond d'écran photos galerie / fondos de pantalla en i

Buscar este blog

9/9/22

Breast Milk Jaundice





Arias first described breast milk jaundice (BMJ) in 1963. Breast milk jaundice is a type of neonatal jaundice associated with breastfeeding. It is characterized by indirect hyperbilirubinemia in a breastfed newborn that develops after the first 4-7 days of life, persists longer than physiologic jaundice, and has no other identifiable cause. It should be differentiated from breastfeeding jaundice, which manifests in the first 3 days of life and is caused by insufficient production or intake of breast milk.


Pathophysiology

Breast milk jaundice is a common cause of indirect hyperbilirubinemia. The etiology of breast milk jaundice is not clearly understood, but the following factors have been suggested to play a role:


An unusual metabolite of progesterone (pregnane-3-alpha 20 beta-diol), a substance in the breast milk that inhibits uridine diphosphoglucuronic acid (UDPGA) glucuronyl transferase

Increased concentrations of nonesterified free fatty acids that inhibit hepatic glucuronyl transferase

Increased enterohepatic circulation of bilirubin due to (1) increased content of beta glucuronidase activity in breast milk and, therefore, the intestines of the breastfed neonate and (2) delayed establishment of enteric flora in breastfed infants

Defects in uridine diphosphate-glucuronyl transferase ( UGT1A1) activity in infants who are homozygous or heterozygous for variants of the Gilbert syndrome promoter and coding region polymorphism.

Reduced hepatic uptake of unconjugated bilirubin due to a mutation in the solute carrier organic anion transporter protein SLCO1B1.

Inflammatory cytokines in human milk, especially interleukin (IL)-1 beta and IL-6, are increased in individuals with breast milk jaundice and are known to be cholestatic and reduce the uptake, metabolism, and excretion of bilirubin. [1]

High epidermal growth factor (EGF) levels in breast milk may be responsible for jaundice in these neonates. EGF is responsible for growth, proliferation, and maturation of the GI tract in newborns and is vital for is adaptation after birth. Higher EGF serum and breast milk levels were noted in patients with breast milk jaundice. [2] The reduced GI motility and increased bilirubin absorption and uptake are thought to be the mechanisms.

Serum alpha feto-protein levels were found to be higher in infants with breast milk jaundice. [3] The exact significance of this finding is unknown.

Breast milk is an important source of bacteria in establishing infantile gut flora. A recent study demonstrated that Bifidobacterium species in breast milk may protect against breast milk jaundice. The exact significance of this finding is unknown. [4]

Please see Neonatal Jaundice for an in-depth review of the pathophysiology of hyperbilirubinemia.


Epidemiology

Frequency

United States

Jaundice occurs in 50-70% of newborns. Moderate jaundice (bilirubin level >12 mg/dL) develops in 4% of bottle-fed newborns, compared to 14% of breastfed newborns. Severe jaundice (bilirubin level >15 mg/dL) occurs in 0.3% of bottle-fed newborns, compared to 2% of breastfed newborns. A strong familial predisposition is also suggested by the recurrence of breast milk jaundice in siblings. In the exclusively breast fed infant, the incidence during the first 2-3 weeks has been reported to be 36%.[5]


International

International frequency is not extensively reported but is thought to be similar to that in the United States.


Mortality/Morbidity

The prognosis is excellent, although jaundice in breastfed infants may persist for as long as 12 weeks.


Breast milk jaundice in otherwise healthy full-term infants rarely causes kernicterus (bilirubin encephalopathy). Case reports suggest that some breastfed infants who suffer from prolonged periods of inadequate breast milk intake and whose bilirubin levels exceeded 25 mg/dL may be at risk of kernicterus. Kernicterus (bilirubin encephalopathy) is a preventable cause of cerebral palsy. Another group of breastfed infants who may be at risk of complications is late preterm infants who are nursing poorly.


Bilirubin encephalopathy (kernicterus) may occur in exclusively breastfed infants in the absence of hemolysis or other specific pathologic conditions. Distinguishing between breastfeeding jaundice and breast milk jaundice is important, because bilirubin-induced encephalopathy occurs more commonly in breastfeeding jaundice. Near-term infants are more likely to manifest breastfeeding jaundice because of difficulty achieving adequate nursing, greater weight loss, and hepatic immaturity.


Race

Whether racial differences are observed in breast milk jaundice is unclear, although an increased prevalence of physiologic jaundice is observed in babies of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Native American descent.


Sex

No sex predilection is known.


Age

Breast milk jaundice manifests after the first 4-7 days of life and can persist for 3-12 weeks.



History

Aspects of history may include the following:


Physiologic jaundice usually manifests after the first 24 hours of life. This can be accentuated by breastfeeding, which, in the first few days of life, may be associated with suboptimal milk and suboptimal caloric intake, especially if milk production is delayed. This is known as breastfeeding jaundice. Jaundice that manifests before the first 24 hours of life should always be considered pathologic until proven otherwise. In this situation, a full diagnostic workup with emphasis on infection and hemolysis should be undertaken.

True breast milk jaundice (BMJ) manifests after the first 4-7 days of life. A second peak in serum bilirubin level is noted by age 14 days.

In clinical practice, differentiating between physiologic jaundice from breast milk jaundice is important so that the duration of hyperbilirubinemia can be predicted. Identifying the infants who become dehydrated secondary to inadequate breastfeeding is also important. These babies need to be identified early and given breastfeeding support and formula supplementation as necessary. Depending on serum bilirubin concentration, neonates with hyperbilirubinemia may become sleepy and feed poorly.

Physical

The following physical findings may be noted:


Clinical jaundice is usually first noticed in the sclera and the face. Then it progresses caudally to reach the abdomen and extremities. Gentle pressure on the skin helps to reveal the extent of jaundice, especially in darker-skinned babies; however, clinical observation is not an accurate measure of the severity of the hyperbilirubinemia.

A rough correlation is observed between blood levels and the extent of jaundice (face, approximately 5 mg/dL; mid abdomen, approximately 15 mg/dL; soles, 20 mg/dL). Therefore, clinical decisions should always be based on serum levels of bilirubin. Skin should have normal perfusion and turgor and show no petechiae.

Neurologic examination, including neonatal reflexes, should be normal, although the infant may be sleepy. Muscle tone and reflexes (eg, Moro reflex, grasp, rooting) should be normal.

Evaluate hydration status by an assessment of the percentage of birth weight that may have been lost, observation of mucous membranes, fontanelle, and skin turgor.

Causes

The following causes may be noted:


Supplementation of breastfeeding with dextrose 5% in water (D5W) can actually increase the prevalence or degree of jaundice.

Delayed milk production and poor feeding lead to decreased caloric intake, dehydration, and increased enterohepatic circulation, resulting in higher serum bilirubin concentration.

The biochemical cause of breast milk jaundice remains under investigation. Some research reported that lipoprotein lipase, found in some breast milk, produces nonesterified long-chain fatty acids, which competitively inhibit glucuronyl transferase conjugating activity.

Glucuronidase has also been found in some breast milk, which results in jaundice.

Decreased uridine diphosphate-glucuronyl transferase (UGT1A1) activity may be associated with prolonged hyperbilirubinemia in breast milk jaundice.[6] This may be comparable to what is observed in patients with Gilbert syndrome.[7] Genetic polymorphisms of the UGT1A1 promoter, specifically the T-3279G and the thymidine-adenine (TA)7 dinucleotide repeat TATAA box variants, were found to be commonly inherited in whites with high allele frequency. These variant promoters reduce the transcriptional UGT1A1 activity. Similarly, mutations in the coding region of the UGT1A1 (eg, G211A, C686A, C1091T, T1456G) have been described in East Asian populations; these mutations reduce the activity of the enzyme and are a cause of Gilbert syndrome.[8]

The G211A mutation in exon 1 (Gly71Arg) is most common, with an allele frequency of 13%. Coexpression of these polymorphism in the promoter and in the coding region are common and further impair the enzyme activity.[9]

A 2011 study has shown that neonates with nucleotide 211GA or AA variation in UGT1A1 genotypes had higher peak serum bilirubin levels than those with GG. This effect was more pronounced in the exclusively breast fed infants compared with exclusively or partially formula fed neonates.[10]

The organic anion transporters (OATPs) are a family of multispecific pumps that mediate the Na- independent uptake of bile salts and broad range of organic compounds. In humans, 3 liver-specific OATPs have been identified: OATP-A, OATP-2, and OATP-8. Unconjugated bilirubin is transported in the liver by OATP-2. A genetic polymorphism for OATP-2 (also known as OATP-C) at nucleotide 388 has been shown to correlate with 3-fold increased risk for development of neonatal jaundice (peak serum bilirubin level of 20 mg/dL) when adjusted for covariates.[11, 12] When the combination of the OATP-2 gene polymorphism with the variant UGT1A1 gene at nucleotide 211 further increased the risk to 22-fold (95% CI, 5.5-88). When these genetic variants were combined with breast milk feeding, the risk for marked neonatal hyperbilirubinemia increased further to 88-fold (95%CI, 12.5-642.5).

In a 2012 study, researchers measured antioxidant properties of breast milk. Bilirubin is a known antioxidant in vitro. It is suggested that there is a homeostasis maintained by the external sources such as breast milk and internal production of antioxidants like bilirubin in the body. In this study, in the breast milk of mothers of newborns with prolonged jaundice, oxidative stress was found to be increased and the protective antioxidant capacity was found to be decreased. The exact clinical significance of this finding is not known.[13]

Diagnostic Considerations

Important considerations


Differentiate breast milk jaundice (BMJ) from pathologic jaundice.


Appropriately treat elevated bilirubin levels in a timely manner


Identify and treat inadequate breastfeeding; avoid dehydration.


Treat preterm infants (estimated gestational age < 38 wk at birth) with phototherapy at lower bilirubin levels (see Neonatal Jaundice).


Other problems to be considered


The following conditions should also be considered in patients with suspected breast milk jaundice:


Hemolytic anemia (RBC membrane defects: spherocytosis, acanthocytosis, ovalocytosis; RBC enzyme defects, hemoglobinopathies)

Blood type incompatibility (ABO and minor group antigens)

Large cephalhematoma

Hypothyroidism

Urinary tract infections

Sepsis

Gilbert syndrome

Early galactosemia

Differential Diagnoses

Anemia, Acute

Galactose-1-Phosphate Uridyltransferase Deficiency (Galactosemia)

Hemolytic Disease of Newborn

Hypothyroidism

Neonatal Jaundice

Neonatal Sepsis

Polycythemia

Polycythemia of the Newborn

Laboratory Studies

Breast milk jaundice (BMJ) is a diagnosis of exclusion. Note the following:


Detailed history and physical examination showing that the infant is thriving and that lactation is well established are key elements to diagnosis. Breastfed babies should have 3-4 transitional stools and 6-7 wet diapers per day and should have regained birth weight by the end of the second week of life or demonstrate a weight gain of 1 oz/d.

Measure total serum bilirubin concentration in neonates who have jaundice that has progressed from the face to the chest and in neonates at risk for hemolytic disease of the newborn.

Consider obtaining the tests discussed below if serum bilirubin levels are greater than 12 mg/dL (170 µmol/L). A total serum bilirubin concentration that rises faster than 5 mg/dL/d (85 µmol/L/d) or jaundice before 24 hours of life suggests pathologic jaundice.


A level of conjugated bilirubin greater than 2 mg/dL (34 µmol/L) suggests cholestasis, biliary atresia, or sepsis (see Neonatal Jaundice).


CBC count with reticulocyte count findings are as follows:


Polycythemia (hematocrit level, >65%)

Anemia (hematocrit level, < 40%)

Sepsis (WBC count, < 5 K/mL or >20 K/mL) with immature to total neutrophil ratio greater than 0.2

Urine specific gravity can be useful in the assessment of hydration status.


If hemolysis is suspected, consider the following tests:


Blood type to evaluate for ABO, Rh or other blood group incompatibility

Coombs test, as well as an elution test for antibodies against A or B, to evaluate for immune mediated hemolysis

Peripheral smear to look for abnormally shaped RBCs (ovalocytes, acanthocytes, spherocytes, schistocytes)

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PD) screen, especially if ethnicity consistent

Factors that suggest possibility of hemolytic disease include the following:


Family history of hemolytic disease

Onset of jaundice before 24 hours of life

Rise in serum bilirubin levels of more than 0.5 mg/dL/h

Pallor, hepatosplenomegaly

Rapid increase in serum bilirubin level after 24-48 hours (G-6-PD deficiency)

Ethnicity suggestive of G-6-PD deficiency

Failure of phototherapy to lower bilirubin level

If sepsis is suspected, consider the following tests:


Blood culture

WBC differential

Platelet count

Urine analysis and culture

Factors that suggest the possibility of sepsis include the following:


Poor feeding

Vomiting

Lethargy

Temperature instability

Apnea

Tachypnea

Signs of cholestatic jaundice that suggest the need to rule out biliary atresia or other causes of cholestasis include the following:


Dark urine or urine positive for bilirubin

Light-colored stools

Persistent jaundice for more than 3 weeks

The follow-up includes the state newborn screen for galactosemia and hypothyroidism.

Medical Care

Treatment recommendations in this section apply only to healthy term infants with no signs of pathologic jaundice and are based on the severity of hyperbilirubinemia. In preterm, anemic, or ill infants and those with early (< 24 h) or severe jaundice (>25 mg/dL or 430 µmol/L), different treatment protocols should be pursued (see Neonatal Jaundice).


For healthy term infants with breast milk or breastfeeding jaundice and with bilirubin levels of 12 mg/dL (170 µmol/L) to 17 mg/dL, the following options are acceptable:


Increase breastfeeding to 8-12 times per day and recheck the serum bilirubin level in 12-24 hours. The mother should be reassured about the relatively benign nature of breast milk jaundice (BMJ). This recommendation assumes that effective breastfeeding is occurring, including milk production, effective latching, and effective sucking with resultant letdown of milk. Breastfeeding can also be supported with manual or electric pumps and the pumped milk given as a supplement to the baby.

Continue breastfeeding and supplement with formula.

Temporary interruption of breastfeeding is rarely needed and is not recommended unless serum bilirubin levels reach 20 mg/dL (340 µmol/L).

For infants with serum bilirubin levels from 17-25 mg/dL (294-430 µmol/L), add phototherapy to any of the previously stated treatment options. The reader is referred to the American Academy of Pediatrics' practice parameter on the management of hyperbilirubinemia in healthy full-term newborn infants.[14]


The most rapid way to reduce the bilirubin level is to interrupt breastfeeding for 24 hours, feed with formula, and use phototherapy; however, in most infants, interrupting breastfeeding is not necessary or advisable.


Phototherapy can be administered with standard phototherapy units and fiberoptic blankets. See the image below.


The graph represents indications for phototherapy 

The graph represents indications for phototherapy and exchange transfusion in infants (with a birthweight of 3500 g) in 108 neonatal ICUs. The left panel shows the range of indications for phototherapy, whereas the right panel shows the indications for exchange transfusion. Numbers on the vertical axes are serum bilirubin concentrations in mg/dL (lateral) and mmol/L (middle). In the left panel, the solid line refers to the current recommendation of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) for low-risk infants, the line consisting of long dashes (- - - - -) represents the level at which the AAP recommends phototherapy for infants at intermediate risk, and the line with short dashes (-----) represents the suggested intervention level for infants at high risk. In the right panel, the dotted line (......) represents the AAP suggested intervention level for exchange transfusion in infants considered at low risk, the line consisting of dash-dot-dash (-.-.-.-.) represents the suggested intervention level for exchange transfusion in infants at intermediate risk, and the line consisting of dash-dot-dot-dash (-..-..-..-) represents the suggested intervention level for infants at high risk. Intensive phototherapy is always recommended while preparations for exchange transfusion are in progress. The box-and-whisker plots show the following values: lower error bar = 10th percentile; lower box margin = 25th percentile; line transecting box = median; upper box margin = 75th percentile; upper error bar = 90th percentile; and lower and upper diamonds = 5th and 95th percentiles, respectively.

Note the following:


Fiberoptic phototherapy can often be safely administered at home, which may allow for improved infant-maternal bonding.

Although sunlight provides sufficient irradiance in the 425-nm to 475-nm band to provide phototherapy, practical difficulties involved in safely exposing a naked newborn to sunlight, either indoors or outdoors (and avoiding sunburn), preclude the use of sunlight as a reliable phototherapy tool; therefore, it is not recommended.

Phototherapy can be discontinued when serum bilirubin levels drop to less than 15 mg/dL (260 µmol/L).

Average bilirubin level rebound has been shown to be less than 1 mg/dL (17 µmol/L); therefore, rechecking the level after discontinuation of phototherapy is not necessary unless hyperbilirubinemia is due to a hemolytic process.

For an in-depth discussion of phototherapy, see Neonatal Jaundice.


Consultations

The following consultations may be indicated:


Consider consultation with a neonatologist when serum bilirubin level approaches 20 mg/dL (430 µmol/L) or when signs and symptoms suggest pathological jaundice and the rate of rise in the serum bilirubin level is more than 0.5 mg/dL/h.

A consultation with a lactation specialist is recommended in any breastfed baby who has jaundice. The expertise of lactation consultants can be extremely helpful, especially in situations in which inadequate breastfeeding is contributing to the jaundice.

Diet

Continue breastfeeding, if possible, and increase frequency of feeding to 8-12 times per day. Depending on maternal preference, breastfeeding can be supplemented or replaced by formula at the same frequency. Supplementation with dextrose solution is not recommended because it may decrease caloric intake and milk production and may consequently delay the drop in serum bilirubin concentration. Breastfeeding can also be supplemented by pumped breast milk.


Activity

No restrictions are necessary. Encourage parents to remove the child from the warmer or infant crib for feeding and bonding. Fiberoptic blankets allow holding and breastfeeding without interruption in treatment.

Further Inpatient Care

If the patient has not been discharged with the parent, monitoring daily weights and serum bilirubin concentration for the need for phototherapy as well as assessment of caloric intake are important. Once serum bilirubin concentration is determined to be within a safe range (< 20 mg/dL) and is not rapidly rising, home phototherapy is an option to consider as long as thorough outpatient follow-up (home visiting nursing assessment or office check-up and bilirubin level monitoring) are feasible.


Weight monitoring is very important in breastfed infants to avoid prolonged and severe jaundice, as well as to avoid hypernatremic dehydration. The general standard states that loss of 10% of birth weight is considered to be significant.


A reference chart for relative weight change to detect hypernatremic dehydration has been proposed.[15]


Further Outpatient Care

The American Academy of Pediatrics Safe and Healthy Begininngs Project has been established to facilitate implementation of the 2004 guidelines for management of hyperbilirubinemia using a systems-based approach. The 3 key aspects of this project include (1) assessment of risk for severe hyperbilirubinemia before hospital discharge, (2) breastfeeding support, and (3) care coordination between the nursery and primary care.[16]


If the infant is treated on an outpatient basis, measure serum bilirubin levels either daily in the clinic or in the home with home-health nurses until the bilirubin level is less than 15 mg/dL (260 µmol/L).


Transfer

Transfer infants with pathologic jaundice or bilirubin levels greater than 20 mg/dL to a center capable of performing exchange transfusions.


Deterrence/Prevention

Keys to deterrence and prevention include the following:


Poor caloric intake associated with insufficient breastfeeding contributes to the development of severe breast milk jaundice (BMJ). The first step toward successful breastfeeding is to make sure that mothers nurse their infants at least 8-12 times per day for the first several days starting from the first hour of life. The whey portion of human milk contains a feedback inhibitory peptide of lactogenesis; hence, effective emptying of the breast with each feeding results in successful lactation.

Infants who nursed more than 8 times during the first 24 hours had earlier meconium passage, reduced maximum weight loss, increased breast milk intake on days 3 and 5, and lower serum bilirubin levels and significantly lower incidence of severe hyperbilirubinemia (>15 mg/dL) on day 6.

In a recent double-blind controlled study, beta-glucuronidase inhibition with L-aspartic acid and enzymatically hydrolyzed casein in exclusively breastfed babies resulted in reduction in peak serum bilirubin level by 70% in first week of life.[17]

According to the latest clinical practice guidelines for the management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn aged 35 or more weeks' gestation, exclusive breastfeeding is a major risk factor for severe hyperbilirubinemia and all infants should be evaluated for the risk of subsequent hyperbilirubinemia by plotting their discharge serum bilirubin levels on an hour-specific nomogram.[14] .

Transcutaneous bilirubinometry is a measurement of yellow color of the blanched skin and subcutaneous tissue and can be used as a screening tool. It has been shown to be fairly reliable, with good correlation between total serum bilirubin (TSB) and transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) levels obtained using instruments currently available in the United States (eg, Draeger Air-Shields Jaundice Meter JM-103, Respironics BiliChek meter by Philips). The TcB measurement tends to underestimate the TSB at higher levels.[18] Confirmation with TSB measurement is indicated in all patients with TcB levels above the 75th percentile and in those in whom therapeutic intervention is considered.

Recent studies suggest that combining clinical risk factors with predischarge measurement of TSB or TcB levels improves the accuracy of risk assessment for subsequent hyperbilirubinemia.[19] The factors most predictive included predischarge TSB or TcB levels above 75th percentile, lower gestational age, and exclusive breastfeeding.[20]

Newborns who are exclusively breastfed and who have elevated predischarge TcB or TSB levels do not qualify for discharge before 48 hours and should be evaluated for phototherapy in 24 hours. Newborns with TcB and TSB levels in the high-intermediate range and newborns who were born at less than 38 weeks' gestation should undergo repeat TSB and TcB measurement within 24 hours of discharge or should receive follow-up within 2 days.[21]

Patient Education

Provide excellent breastfeeding education. Refer to a lactation consultant or La Leche League.


For patient education resources, see the Pregnancy and Reproduction Center, as well as Breastfeeding.


References

Zanardo V, Golin R, Amato M, Trevisanuto D, Favaro F, Faggian D. Cytokines in human colostrum and neonatal jaundice. Pediatr Res. Aug 2007;62(2):191-4. [Medline].


Kumral A, Ozkan H, Duman N, Yesilirmak DC, Islekel H, Ozalp Y. Breast milk jaundice correlates with high levels of epidermal growth factor. Pediatr Res. Aug 2009;66(2):218-21. [Medline].


Rosa Manganaro, Lucia Marseglia, Carmelo Mami, Giuseppe Saitta, Romana Gargano, Marina Gernellie. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels in breastfed infants with prolonged indirect hyperbilirubinemia. Early Human Development. 2008;84:487-490.


Tuzun F, Kumral A, Duman N, Ozkan H. Breast milk jaundice: effect of bacteria present in breast milk and infant feces. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. Mar 2013;56(3):328-32. [Medline].


Alonso EM, Whitington PF, Whitington SH, Rivard WA, Given G. Enterohepatic circulation of nonconjugated bilirubin in rats fed with human milk. J Pediatr. Mar 1991;118(3):425-30. [Medline].


Maruo Y, Nishizawa K, Sato H, Sawa H, Shimada M. Prolonged unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia associated with breast milk and mutations of the bilirubin uridine diphosphate- glucuronosyltransferase gene. Pediatrics. Nov 2000;106(5):E59. [Medline]. [Full Text].


Monaghan G, McLellan A, McGeehan A, Li Volti S, Mollica F, Salemi I. Gilbert's syndrome is a contributory factor in prolonged unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia of the newborn. J Pediatr. Apr 1999;134(4):441-6. [Medline].


Huang CS, Chang PF, Huang MJ, Chen ES, Hung KL, Tsou KI. Relationship between bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Res. Oct 2002;52(4):601-5. [Medline].


Lin Z, Fontaine J, Watchko JF. Coexpression of gene polymorphisms involved in bilirubin production and metabolism. Pediatrics. Jul 2008;122(1):e156-62. [Medline].


Chou HC, Chen MH, Yang HI, et al. 211 G to a variation of UDP-glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene and neonatal breastfeeding jaundice. Pediatr Res. Feb 2011;69(2):170-4. [Medline].


Huang MJ, Kua KE, Teng HC, Tang KS, Weng HW, Huang CS. Risk factors for severe hyperbilirubinemia in neonates. Pediatr Res. Nov 2004;56(5):682-9. [Medline].


Watchko JF. Genetics and the risk of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: commentary on the article by Huang et al. on page 682. Pediatr Res. Nov 2004;56(5):677-8. [Medline].


Uras N, Tonbul A, Karadag A, Dogan DG, Erel O, Tatli MM. Prolonged jaundice in newborns is associated with low antioxidant capacity in breast milk. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. Oct 2010;70(6):433-7. [Medline].


[Guideline] American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia. Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. Jul 2004;114(1):297-316. [Medline].


van Dommelen P, van Wouwe JP, Breuning-Boers JM, van Buuren S, Verkerk PH. Reference chart for relative weight change to detect hypernatraemic dehydration. Arch Dis Child. Jun 2007;92(6):490-4. [Medline].


Stark AR, Lannon CM. Systems changes to prevent severe hyperbilirubinemia and promote breastfeeding: pilot approaches. J Perinatol. Feb 2009;29 Suppl 1:S53-7. [Medline].


[Best Evidence] Gourley GR, Li Z, Kreamer BL. A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Prophylaxis Against Jaundice Among Breastfed Newborns. Pediatrics. 116:385 - 391. [Medline].


Maisels MJ. Transcutaneous bilirubinometry. Neoreviews. 2006;7(5):e217-e225.


Keren R, Luan X, Friedman S, Saddlemire S, Cnaan A, Bhutani VK. A comparison of alternative risk-assessment strategies for predicting significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in term and near-term infants. Pediatrics. Jan 2008;121(1):e170-9. [Medline].


Maisels MJ, Deridder JM, Kring EA, Balasubramaniam M. Routine transcutaneous bilirubin measurements combined with clinical risk factors improve the prediction of subsequent hyperbilirubinemia. J Perinatol. Sep 2009;29(9):612-7. [Medline].


Maisels MJ, Bhutani VK, Bogen D, Newman TB, Stark AR, Watchko JF. Hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant > or =35 weeks' gestation: an update with clarifications. Pediatrics. Oct 2009;124(4):1193-8. [Medline].


Bhutani VK, Johnson L, Sivieri EM. Predictive ability of a predischarge hour-specific serum bilirubin for subsequent significant hyperbilirubinemia in healthy term and near-term newborns. Pediatrics. Jan 1999;103(1):6-14. [Medline].


Fontaine P. The first month of life. In: Handbook of Pregnancy and Perinatal Care in Family Practice. Hanley & Belfus; 1995:396-429.


Gartner LM, Herschel M. Jaundice and breastfeeding. Pediatr Clin North Am. Apr 2001;48(2):389-99. [Medline].


Grunebaum E, Amir J, Merlob P, et al. Breast mild jaundice: natural history, familial incidence and late neurodevelopmental outcome of the infant. Eur J Pediatr. Feb 1991;150(4):267-70. [Medline].


Hamosh M, Bitman J. Human milk in disease: lipid composition. Lipids. Nov 1992;27(11):848-57. [Medline].


Huang MJ, Kua KE, Teng HC, Tang KS, Weng HW, Huang CS. Risk factors for severe hyperbilirubinemia in neonates. Pediatr Res. Nov 2004;56(5):682-9. [Medline].


Johnson LH, Bhutani VK, Brown AK. System-based approach to management of neonatal jaundice and prevention of kernicterus. J Pediatr. Apr 2002;140(4):396-403.  


Lovejoy FH Jr, Robertson WO, Woolf AD. Poison centers, poison prevention, and the pediatrician. Pediatrics. Aug 1994;94(2 Pt 1):220-4.  


Maisels MJ, Newman TB. Kernicterus in otherwise healthy, breast-fed term newborns. Pediatrics. Oct 1995;96(4 Pt 1):730-3.  


Martinez JC, Maisels MJ, Otheguy L, et al. Hyperbilirubinemia in the breast-fed newborn: a controlled trial of four interventions. Pediatrics. Feb 1993;91(2):470-3.  


Schneider AP 2nd. Breast milk jaundice in the newborn. A real entity. JAMA. Jun 20 1986;255(23):3270-4.  


Yamauchi Y, Yamanouchi I. Breast-feeding frequency during the first 24 hours after birth in full-term neonates. Pediatrics. Aug 1990;86(2):171-5.  

Calfactant = Infasurf






INDICATIONS AND USE: Prevention and treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

ACTIONS: Natural, preservative-free calf lung extract that contains phospholipids, neutral lipids, fatty acids, and

surfactant-associated proteins B and C. Each milliliter of calfactant contains 35 mg of total phospholipids and

0.65 mg of proteins (0.26 mg of protein B). Calfactant decreases the surface tension on alveolar surfaces, stabilizing

the alveoli and preventing collapse. This results in improved ventilation, lung compliance, and gas exchange.

DOSAGE: ETT.

• Prophylactic initial dose for RDS: As soon as possible after birth, give 3 mL/kg/dose, divided into two

1.5–mL/kg aliquots. After the instillation of each aliquot, position infant either on the right or left side.

Ventilation is continued during administration over 20–30 seconds. The 2 aliquots should be separated by a

pause to evaluate respiratory status and reposition the patient.

• The initial dose may be followed by 3 subsequent doses of 3 mL/kg/dose at 12-hour intervals, if necessary.

ADVERSE EFFECTS: Bradycardia, cyanosis, airway obstruction, pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage, and

apnea. Most adverse effects occur during administration of dose.

COMMENTS: Following administration, lung compliance and oxygenation often rapidly improve. Patients should

be closely monitored and appropriate changes in ventilatory support should be made as clinically indicated.

Central Pontine Myelinolysis CPM












Central pontine myelinolysis (CPM), also known as Osmotic demyelination syndrome or Central pontine demyelination, is a neurological disease caused by severe damage of the myelin sheath of nerve cells in the brainstem, more precisely in the area termed the pons, predominately of iatrogenic etiology. It is characterized by acute paralysis, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dysarthria (difficulty speaking), and other neurological symptoms.

It can also occur outside the pons.[1] The term "osmotic demyelination syndrome" is similar to "central pontine myelinolysis", but also includes areas outside the pons.[2]

Central pontine myelinolysis presents most commonly as a complication of treatment of patients with profound, life-threatening hyponatremia (low sodium). It occurs as a consequence of a rapid rise in serum tonicity following treatment in individuals with chronic, severe hyponatremia who have made intracellular adaptations to the prevailing hypotonicity.[3] Hyponatremia should be corrected at a rate of no more than 8-12 mmol/L of sodium per day to prevent central pontine myelinolysis.[3]

Although less common, it may also present in patients with a history of chronic alcoholism or other conditions related to decreased liver function. In these cases, the condition is often unrelated to correction of sodium or electrolyte imbalance.

Pathophysiology 

The currently accepted theory states that the brain cells adjust their osmolarities by changing levels of certain osmolytes like inositol, betaine, and glutamine in response to varying serum osmolality. In the context of chronic low plasma sodium (hyponatremia), the brain compensates by decreasing the levels of these osmolytes within the cells, so that they can remain relatively isotonic with their surroundings and not absorb too much fluid. The reverse is true in hypernatremia, in which the cells increase their intracellular osmolytes so as not to lose too much fluid to the extracellular space.

With correction of the hyponatremia with intravenous fluids, the extracellular tonicity increases, followed by an increase in intracellular tonicity. When the correction is too rapid, not enough time is allowed for the brain's cells to adjust to the new tonicity, namely by increasing the intracellular osmoles mentioned earlier. If the serum sodium levels rise too rapidly, the increased extracellular tonicity will continue to drive water out of the brain's cells. This can lead to cellular dysfunction and the condition of central pontine myelinolysis, where the myelin sheath surrounding the nerve axons becomes damaged in the part of the brain called the pons.,[4][5]

Causes 

Loss of myelinated fibers at the basis pontis in the brainstem (Luxol-Fast blue stain)

The most common cause is the too rapid correction of low blood sodium levels (hyponatremia).[6]


It has also been known to occur in patients suffering withdrawal symptoms of chronic alcoholism.[7] In these instances, occurrence may be entirely unrelated to hyponatremia or rapid correction of hyponatremia.

It has been observed following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.[8]

CPM may also occur in patients affected by

severe liver disease

liver transplant[9][10][11]

alcoholism

severe burns[12][13]

malnutrition

anorexia[14][15][16]

severe electrolyte disorders

AIDS

hyperemesis gravidarum[17][18]

hyponatremia due to Peritoneal Dialysis

Wernicke encephalopathy[19]

Diagnosis 

It can be difficult to identify using conventional imaging techniques. It presents more prominently on MRI than on CT, often taking several weeks after acute onset of symptoms before it becomes identifiable. Imaging by MRI demonstrates an area of high signal return on T2 weighted images.

Symptoms 

T2 weighted magnetic resonance scan image showing bilaterally symmetrical hyperintensities in Caudate nucleus (small, thin arrow), Putamen (long arrow), with sparing of Globus Pallidus (broad arrow), suggestive of Extrapontine myelinolysis.

Clinical presentation of CPM is heterogeneous and depend on the regions of the brain involved. Observable immediate precursors may include seizures, disturbed consciousness, gait changes, and decrease or cessation of respiratory function.[20][21]

Frequently observed symptoms in this disorder are acute para- or quadraparesis, dysphagia, dysarthria, diplopia, loss of consciousness, and other neurological symptoms associated with brainstem damage. The patient may experience locked-in syndrome where cognitive function is intact, but all muscles are paralyzed with the exception of eye blinking. These result from a rapid myelinolysis of the corticobulbar and corticospinal tracts in the brainstem.[22]

Prevention and treatment 

To prevent CPM from its most common cause, overly rapid reversal of hyponatremia, the hyponatremia should be corrected at a rate not exceeding 10 mmol/L/24 h or 0.5 mEq/L/h; or 18 m/Eq/L/48hrs; thus avoiding hypernatremia.[3] Details concerning the etiology and correction of electrolyte disorders are discussed extensively in general medicine texts. Alcoholic patients should receive vitamin supplementation and a formal evaluation of their nutritional status.[23][24]

Once demyelination of the pons has begun, there is no cure or specific treatment. Care is supportive, with the goal of preventing complications like aspiration pneumonia or deep vein thrombosis. Alcoholics are usually given vitamins to correct for other deficiencies.

Research has led to improved outcomes.[25] Animal studies suggest that inositol reduces the severity of osmotic demyelination syndrome if given before attempting to correct chronic hyponatraemia.[26] Further study is required before using inositol in humans for this purpose.

Prognosis 

The prognosis is overall poor. However, recent data indicate that the prognosis of critically ill patients may even be better than what is generally considered,[27] despite severe initial clinical manifestations and a tendency by the intensivists to underestimate a possible favorable evolution.[28] While some patients die, most survive and of the survivors, approximately one-third recover; one-third are disabled but are able to live independently; one-third are severely disabled.[29] Permanent disabilities range from minor tremors and ataxia to signs of severe brain damage, such as spastic quadriparesis and locked-in syndrome.[30] Some improvements may be seen over the course of the first several months after the condition stabilizes.

The extent of recovery depends on how many axons were damaged.[4]




References 

Jump up ^ Gocht A, Colmant HJ (1987). "Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: a report of 58 cases". Clin. Neuropathol. 6 (6): 262–70. PMID 3322623.

Jump up ^ Lampl C, Yazdi K (2002). "Central pontine myelinolysis". Eur. Neurol. 47 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1159/000047939. PMID 11803185. Archived from the original on 2010-11-18.

^ Jump up to: a b c Babar, S. (October 2013). "SIADH Associated With Ciprofloxacin." (PDF). Annals of Pharmacotherapy (Sage Publishing) 47 (10): 1359–1363. doi:10.1177/1060028013502457. ISSN 1060-0280. PMID 24259701. Retrieved November 18, 2013.

^ Jump up to: a b Medana IM, Esiri MM (March 2003). "Axonal damage: a key predictor of outcome in human CNS diseases". Brain 126 (Pt 3): 515–30. doi:10.1093/brain/awg061. PMID 12566274.

Jump up ^ Spasovski G, Vanholder R, Allolio B, Annane D, Ball S, Bichet D, Decaux G, Fenske W, Hoorn E, Ichai C, Joannidis M, Soupart A, Zietse R, Haller M, van der Veer S, Van Biesen W, Nagler E (2014). "Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia". European Journal of Endocrinology 170: G1–G47. doi:10.1530/eje-13-1020. PMID 24569125.

Jump up ^ Bernsen HJ, Prick MJ (September 1999). "Improvement of central pontine myelinolysis as demonstrated by repeated magnetic resonance imaging in a patient without evidence of hyponatremia". Acta Neurol Belg 99 (3): 189–93. PMID 10544728.

Jump up ^ Yoon B, Shim YS, Chung SW (2008). "Central Pontine and Extrapontine Myelinolysis After Alcohol Withdrawal". Alcohol 43 (6): 647–9. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agn050.

Jump up ^ Lim KH, Kim S, Lee YS; et al. (April 2008). "Central pontine myelinolysis in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case report". J. Korean Med. Sci. 23 (2): 324–7. doi:10.3346/jkms.2008.23.2.324. PMC 2526450. PMID 18437020.[dead link]

Jump up ^ Singh N, Yu VL, Gayowski T (March 1994). "Central nervous system lesions in adult liver transplant recipients: clinical review with implications for management". Medicine (Baltimore) 73 (2): 110–8. doi:10.1097/00005792-199403000-00004. PMID 8152365.

Jump up ^ Kato T, Hattori H, Nagato M, Kiuchi T, Uemoto S, Nakahata T, Tanaka K (April 2002). "Subclinical central pontine myelinolysis following liver transplantation". Brain Dev. 24 (3): 179–82. doi:10.1016/S0387-7604(02)00013-X. PMID 11934516. Retrieved 2014-05-29.

Jump up ^ Martinez AJ, Estol C, Faris AA (May 1988). "Neurologic complications of liver transplantation". Neurol Clin 6 (2): 327–48. PMID 3047544.

Jump up ^ McKee AC, Winkelman MD, Banker BQ (August 1988). "Central pontine myelinolysis in severely burned patients: relationship to serum hyperosmolality". Neurology 38 (8): 1211–7. doi:10.1212/wnl.38.8.1211. PMID 3399069.

Jump up ^ Winkelman MD, Galloway PG (September 1992). "Central nervous system complications of thermal burns. A postmortem study of 139 patients". Medicine (Baltimore) 71 (5): 271–83. doi:10.1097/00005792-199209000-00002. PMID 1522803.

Jump up ^ Sugimoto T, Murata T, Omori M, Wada Y (March 2003). "Central pontine myelinolysis associated with hypokalaemia in anorexia nervosa". J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 74 (3): 353–5. doi:10.1136/jnnp.74.3.353. PMC 1738317. PMID 12588925. Retrieved 2014-05-29.

Jump up ^ Keswani SC (April 2004). "Central pontine myelinolysis associated with hypokalaemia in anorexia nervosa". J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 75 (4): 663; author reply 663. PMC 1739009. PMID 15026526. Retrieved 2014-05-29.

Jump up ^ Leroy S, Gout A, Husson B, de Tournemire R, Tardieu M (June 2012). "Centropontine myelinolysis related to refeeding syndrome in an adolescent suffering from anorexia nervosa". Neuropediatrics 43 (3): 152–4. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1307458. PMID 22473289. Retrieved 2014-05-29.

Jump up ^ Bergin PS, Harvey P (August 1992). "Wernicke's encephalopathy and central pontine myelinolysis associated with hyperemesis gravidarum". BMJ 305 (6852): 517–8. doi:10.1136/bmj.305.6852.517. PMC 1882865. PMID 1393001. Retrieved 2014-05-29.

Jump up ^ Sutamnartpong P, Muengtaweepongsa S, Kulkantrakorn K (January 2013). "Wernicke's encephalopathy and central pontine myelinolysis in hyperemesis gravidarum". J Neurosci Rural Pract 4 (1): 39–41. doi:10.4103/0976-3147.105608. PMC 3579041. PMID 23546346. Retrieved 2014-05-29.

Jump up ^ Kishimoto Y, Ikeda K, Murata K, Kawabe K, Hirayama T, Iwasaki Y (2012). "Rapid development of central pontine myelinolysis after recovery from Wernicke encephalopathy: a non-alcoholic case without hyponatremia". Intern. Med. 51 (12): 1599–603. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.51.7498. PMID 22728498. Retrieved 2014-05-29.

Jump up ^ Musana AK, Yale SH (August 2005). "Central pontine myelinolysis: case series and review". WMJ 104 (6): 56–60. PMID 16218318.

Jump up ^ Odier C, Nguyen DK, Panisset M (July 2010). "Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: from epileptic and other manifestations to cognitive prognosis". J. Neurol. 257 (7): 1176–80. doi:10.1007/s00415-010-5486-7. PMID 20148334.

Jump up ^ Karp BI, Laureno R (November 1993). "Pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: a neurologic disorder following rapid correction of hyponatremia". Medicine (Baltimore) 72 (6): 359–73. doi:10.1097/00005792-199311000-00001. PMID 8231786.

Jump up ^ Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Norenberg MD (March 1981). "Rapid correction of hyponatremia causes demyelination: relation to central pontine myelinolysis". Science 211 (4486): 1068–70. doi:10.1126/science.7466381. PMID 7466381.

Jump up ^ Laureno R (1980). "Experimental pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis". Trans Am Neurol Assoc 105: 354–8. PMID 7348981.

Jump up ^ Brown WD (December 2000). "Osmotic demyelination disorders: central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis". Curr. Opin. Neurol. 13 (6): 691–7. doi:10.1097/00019052-200012000-00014. PMID 11148672.

Jump up ^ Silver SM, Schroeder BM, Sterns RH, Rojiani AM (2006). "Myoinositol administration improves survival and reduces myelinolysis after rapid correction of chronic hyponatremia in rats". J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 65 (1): 37–44. doi:10.1097/01.jnen.0000195938.02292.39. PMID 16410747.

Jump up ^ Louis G, Megarbane B, Lavoué S, Lassalle V, Argaud L, Poussel JF, Georges H, Bollaert PE (March 2012). "Long-term outcome of patients hospitalized in intensive care units with central or extrapontine myelinolysis*". Critical Care Medicine 40 (3): 970–2. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236f152. PMID 22036854. Retrieved 2014-05-30.

Jump up ^ Young GB (March 2012). "Central pontine myelinolysis: a lesson in humility*". Critical Care Medicine 40 (3): 1026–7. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823b8e0b. PMID 22343870. Retrieved 2014-05-30.

Jump up ^ Abbott R, Silber E, Felber J, Ekpo E (October 2005). "Osmotic demyelination syndrome". BMJ 331 (7520): 829–30. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7520.829. PMC 1246086. PMID 16210283.

Jump up ^ http://www.emedicine.com/NEURO/topic50.htm

Blau Syndrome






In 1985 Edward Blau, a pediatrician in Marshfield Wisconsin, reported a family that over four generations had granulomatous inflammation of the skin, eyes and joints. The condition was transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait. In the same year Jabs et al. reported a family that over two generations had granulomatous synovitis, uveitis and cranial neuropathies. The condition was transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion. In 1981 Malleson et al. reported a family that had autosomal dominant synovitis, camptodactyly, and iridocyclitis. One member died of granulomatous arteritis of the heart and aorta. In 1982 Rotenstein reported a family with granulomatous arteritis, rash, iritis, and arthritis transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait over three generations. Then in 1990 Pastores et al. reported a kindred with a phenotype very similar to what Blau described and suggested that the condition be called Blau Syndrome (BS). They also pointed out the similarities in the families noted above to BS but also pointed out the significant differences in the phenotypes. In 1996 Tromp et al. conducted a genome wide search using affected and non affected members of the original family. A marker D16S298gave a maximum LOD score of 3.75 and put the BS susceptibility locus within the 16p12-q21 interval. Hugot et al. found a susceptibility locus for Crohn disease a granulomatous inflammation of the bowel on chromosome 16 close to the locus for BS. Based on the above information Blau suggested in 1998 that the genetic defect in BS and Crohn Disease might be the same or similar.

Finally in 2001 Miceli-Richard et al. found the defect in BS to be in the nucleotide-binding domain of CARD15/NOD2. They commented in their article that mutations in CARD15 had also been found in Crohn Disease. Confirmation of the defect in BS being in the CARD15 gene was made by Wang et al. in 2002 using the BS family and others.(

With that information the diagnosis of BS was not only determined by phenotype but now by genotype.

Early onset sarcoidosis is BS without a family history, BS has been diagnosed in patients who have not only the classic triad but granuloma in multiple organs. Treatment has included the usual anti inflammatory drugs such as adrenal glucocorticoids, anti metabolites and also biological agents such as anti-TNF and infliximab all with varying degrees of success.

The elucidation that the gene defect in BS involves the CARD15/NOD2 gene has stimulated many investigators to define how this gene operates as part of the innate immune system that responds to bacterial polysaccharides such as muramyl dipeptide to induce signaling pathways that induce cytokine responses that protect the organism. In BS the genetic defect seems to lead to over expression and poor control of the inflammatory response leading to widespread granulomatous inflammation and tissue damage. This reference provides an excellent review of not only the clinical aspects of BS but also the presumed pathogenetic mechanisms brought about by the gene defect.

Blood–Brain Barrier BBB






The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a highly selective permeability barrier that separates the circulating blood from the brain extracellular fluid (BECF) in the central nervous system (CNS). The blood–brain barrier is formed by brain endothelial cells, which are connected by tight junctions with an extremely high electrical resistivity of at least 0.1 Ω⋅m.[1] The blood–brain barrier allows the passage of water, some gases, and lipid-soluble molecules by passive diffusion, as well as the selective transport of molecules such as glucose and amino acids that are crucial to neural function. On the other hand, the blood–brain barrier may prevent the entry of lipophilic, potential neurotoxins by way of an active transport mechanism mediated by P-glycoprotein. Astrocytes are necessary to create the blood–brain barrier. A small number of regions in the brain, including the circumventricular organs (CVOs), do not have a blood–brain barrier.

The blood–brain barrier occurs along all capillaries and consists of tight junctions around the capillaries that do not exist in normal circulation.[2] Endothelial cells restrict the diffusion of microscopic objects (e.g., bacteria) and large or hydrophilic molecules into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), while allowing the diffusion of small or hydrophobic molecules (O2, CO2, hormones).[3] Cells of the barrier actively transport metabolic products such as glucose across the barrier with specific proteins.[4] This barrier also includes a thick basement membrane and astrocytic endfeet.[5]

Structure 

This "barrier" results from the selectivity of the tight junctions between endothelial cells in CNS vessels that restricts the passage of solutes.[6] At the interface between blood and the brain, endothelial cells are stitched together by these tight junctions, which are composed of smaller subunits, frequently biochemical dimers, that are transmembrane proteins such as occludin, claudins, junctional adhesion molecule (JAM), or ESAM, for example.[4] Each of these transmembrane proteins is anchored into the endothelial cells by another protein complex that includes zo-1 and associated proteins.[4]

The blood–brain barrier is composed of high-density cells restricting passage of substances from the bloodstream much more than do the endothelial cells in capillaries elsewhere in the body.[citation needed] Astrocyte cell projections called astrocytic feet (also known as "glia limitans") surround the endothelial cells of the BBB, providing biochemical support to those cells.[7] The BBB is distinct from the quite similar blood–cerebrospinal-fluid barrier, which is a function of the choroidal cells of the choroid plexus, and from the blood–retinal barrier, which can be considered a part of the whole realm of such barriers.[8]

Several areas of the human brain are not on the brain side of the BBB. Some examples of this include the circumventricular organs, the roof of the third and fourth ventricles, capillaries in the pineal gland on the roof of the diencephalon and the pineal gland. The pineal gland secretes the hormone melatonin "directly into the systemic circulation",[9] thus melatonin is not affected by the blood–brain barrier.[10]

Development 

Originally, experiments in the 1920s seemed to show that the blood–brain barrier (BBB) was still immature in newborns. The reason for this mistake was an error in methodology (the osmotic pressure was too high and the delicate embryonal capillary vessels were partially damaged). It was later shown in experiments with a reduced volume of the injected liquids that the markers under investigation could not pass the BBB. It was reported that those natural substances such as albumin, α-1-fetoprotein or transferrin with elevated plasma concentration in the newborn could not be detected outside of cells in the brain. The transporter P-glycoprotein exists already in the embryonal endothelium.[11]

The measurement of brain uptake of acetamide, antipyrine, benzyl alcohol, butanol, caffeine, cytosine, phenytoin, ethanol, ethylene glycol, heroin, mannitol, methanol, phenobarbital, propylene glycol, thiourea, and urea in ether-anesthetized newborns vs. adult rabbits shows that newborn rabbit and adult rabbit brain endothelia are functionally similar with respect to lipid-mediated permeability.[12] These data confirmed no differences in permeability could be detected between newborn and adult BBB capillaries. No difference in brain uptake of glucose, amino acids, organic acids, purines, nucleosides, or choline was observed between adult and newborn rabbits.[12] These experiments indicate that the newborn BBB has restrictive properties similar to that of the adult. In contrast to suggestions of an immature barrier in young animals, these studies indicate that a sophisticated, selective BBB is operative at birth.

Function 

The blood–brain barrier acts very effectively to protect the brain from many common bacterial infections. Thus, infections of the brain are very rare. Infections of the brain that do occur are often very serious and difficult to treat. Antibodies are too large to cross the blood–brain barrier, and only certain antibiotics are able to pass.[13] In some cases a drug has to be administered directly into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).[14][15] However, drugs delivered directly to the CSF do not effectively penetrate into the brain tissue itself, possibly due to the tortuous nature of the interstitial space in the brain.[13] The blood–brain barrier becomes more permeable during inflammation. This allows some antibiotics and phagocytes to move across the BBB. However, this also allows bacteria and viruses to infiltrate the BBB.[13][16] An exception to the bacterial exclusion is the diseases caused by spirochetes, such as Borrelia, which causes Lyme disease, Group B streptococci which causes meningitis in newborns[17] and Treponema pallidum, which causes syphilis. These harmful bacteria gain access by releasing cytotoxins like pneumolysin[18] which have a direct toxic effect on brain microvascular endothelium[19] and tight junctions.

There are also some biochemical poisons that are made up of large molecules that are too big to pass through the blood–brain barrier. This was especially important in more primitive times when people often ate contaminated food. Neurotoxins such as botulinum in the food might affect peripheral nerves, but the blood–brain barrier can often prevent such toxins from reaching the central nervous system, where they could cause serious or fatal damage.[20]

Clinical significance 

As a drug target 

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is formed by the brain capillary endothelium and excludes from the brain ∼100% of large-molecule neurotherapeutics and more than 98% of all small-molecule drugs.[6] Overcoming the difficulty of delivering therapeutic agents to specific regions of the brain presents a major challenge to treatment of most brain disorders. In its neuroprotective role, the blood–brain barrier functions to hinder the delivery of many potentially important diagnostic and therapeutic agents to the brain. Therapeutic molecules and antibodies that might otherwise be effective in diagnosis and therapy do not cross the BBB in adequate amounts.

Mechanisms for drug targeting in the brain involve going either "through" or "behind" the BBB. Modalities for drug delivery/Dosage form through the BBB entail its disruption by osmotic means; biochemically by the use of vasoactive substances such as bradykinin; or even by localized exposure to high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).[21] Other methods used to get through the BBB may entail the use of endogenous transport systems, including carrier-mediated transporters such as glucose and amino acid carriers; receptor-mediated transcytosis for insulin or transferrin; and the blocking of active efflux transporters such as p-glycoprotein. However, vectors targeting BBB transporters, such as the transferrin receptor, have been found to remain entrapped in brain endothelial cells of capillaries, instead of being ferried across the BBB into the cerebral parenchyma.[22][23] Methods for drug delivery behind the BBB include intracerebral implantation (such as with needles) and convection-enhanced distribution. Mannitol can be used in bypassing the BBB.

Nanoparticles 

Nanotechnology may also help in the transfer of drugs across the BBB.[24][25] Recently, researchers have been trying to build liposomes loaded with nanoparticles to gain access through the BBB. More research is needed to determine which strategies will be most effective and how they can be improved for patients with brain tumors. The potential for using BBB opening to target specific agents to brain tumors has just begun to be explored.

Delivering drugs across the blood–brain barrier is one of the most promising applications of nanotechnology in clinical neuroscience. Nanoparticles could potentially carry out multiple tasks in a predefined sequence, which is very important in the delivery of drugs across the blood–brain barrier.

A significant amount of research in this area has been spent exploring methods of nanoparticle-mediated delivery of antineoplastic drugs to tumors in the central nervous system. For example, radiolabeled polyethylene glycol coated hexadecylcyanoacrylate nanospheres targeted and accumulated in a rat gliosarcoma.[26] However, this method is not yet ready for clinical trials, due to the accumulation of the nanospheres in surrounding healthy tissue. Recently, a novel class of multifunctional nanoparticles known as magneto-electric nanoparticles (MENs) has been discovered for externally controlled targeted delivery and release of drug(s) across BBB as well as wireless stimulation of cells deep in the brain. This approach depends more on the field control and less on the cellular microenvironment. In vitro and in vivo (on mice) experiments to prove the feasibility of using MENs to release a drug across BBB on demand and wirelessly stimulate the brain have been conducted by the research group of Prof. Sakhrat Khizroev at Florida International University (FIU).[27]

It should be noted that vascular endothelial cells and associated pericytes are often abnormal in tumors and that the blood–brain barrier may not always be intact in brain tumors. Also, the basement membrane is sometimes incomplete. Other factors, such as astrocytes, may contribute to the resistance of brain tumors to therapy.[28][29]

Peptides 

Peptides are able to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) through various mechanisms, opening new diagnostic and therapeutic avenues.[30] However, their BBB transport data are scattered in the literature over different disciplines, using different methodologies reporting different influx or efflux aspects. Therefore, a comprehensive BBB peptide database (Brainpeps) was constructed to collect the BBB data available in the literature. Brainpeps currently contains BBB transport information with positive as well as negative results. The database is a useful tool to prioritize peptide choices for evaluating different BBB responses or studying quantitative structure-property (BBB behaviour) relationships of peptides. Because a multitude of methods have been used to assess the BBB behaviour of compounds, we classified these methods and their responses. Moreover, the relationships between the different BBB transport methods have been clarified and visualized.[31]

Casomorphin is a heptapeptide and could be able to pass the BBB.[32]

Disease 

Meningitis 

Meningitis is an inflammation of the membranes that surround the brain and spinal cord (these membranes are known as meninges). Meningitis is most commonly caused by infections with various pathogens, examples of which are Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. When the meninges are inflamed, the blood–brain barrier may be disrupted.[13] This disruption may increase the penetration of various substances (including either toxins or antibiotics) into the brain. Antibiotics used to treat meningitis may aggravate the inflammatory response of the central nervous system by releasing neurotoxins from the cell walls of bacteria - like lipopolysaccharide (LPS).[33] Depending on the causative pathogen, whether it is bacterial, fungal, or protozoan, treatment with third-generation or fourth-generation cephalosporin or amphotericin B is usually prescribed.[34]

Brain abscess 

A brain or cerebral abscess, like other abscesses, is caused by inflammation and collection of lymphatic cells and infected material originating from a local or remote infection. Brain abscess is a rare, life-threatening condition. Local sources may include infections of the ear, the oral cavity and teeth, the paranasal sinuses, or epidural abscess. Remote sources may include infections in the lung, heart or kidney. A brain abscess may also be caused by head trauma or as a complication of surgery. In children cerebral abscesses are usually linked to congenital heart disease.[35] In most cases, 8–12 weeks of antibacterial therapy is required.[13]

Epilepsy 

Epilepsy is a common neurological disease that is characterized by recurrent and sometimes untreatable seizures. Several clinical and experimental data have implicated the failure of blood–brain barrier function in triggering chronic or acute seizures.[36][37][38][39][40] Some studies implicate the interactions between a common blood protein (albumin) and astrocytes.[41] These findings suggest that acute seizures are a predictable consequence of disruption of the BBB by either artificial or inflammatory mechanisms. In addition, expression of drug resistance molecules and transporters at the BBB are a significant mechanism of resistance to commonly used anti-epileptic drugs.[42][43]

Multiple sclerosis 

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered to be an auto-immune and neurodegenerative disorder in which the immune system attacks the myelin that protects and electrically insulates the neurons of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Normally, a person's nervous system would be inaccessible to the white blood cells due to the blood–brain barrier. However, magnetic resonance imaging has shown that when a person is undergoing an MS "attack," the blood–brain barrier has broken down in a section of the brain or spinal cord, allowing white blood cells called T lymphocytes to cross over and attack the myelin. It has sometimes been suggested that, rather than being a disease of the immune system, MS is a disease of the blood–brain barrier.[44] The weakening of the blood–brain barrier may be a result of a disturbance in the endothelial cells on the inside of the blood vessel, due to which the production of the protein P-glycoprotein is not working well.[45]

There are currently active investigations into treatments for a compromised blood–brain barrier. It is believed that oxidative stress plays an important role into the breakdown of the barrier. Anti-oxidants such as lipoic acid may be able to stabilize a weakening blood–brain barrier.[46]

Neuromyelitis optica 

Neuromyelitis optica, also known as Devic's disease, is similar to and is often confused with multiple sclerosis. Among other differences from MS, a different target of the autoimmune response has been identified. Patients with neuromyelitis optica have high levels of antibodies against a protein called aquaporin 4 (a component of the astrocytic foot processes in the blood–brain barrier).[47]

Late-stage neurological trypanosomiasis (Sleeping sickness)  

Late-stage neurological trypanosomiasis, or sleeping sickness, is a condition in which trypanosoma protozoa are found in brain tissue. It is not yet known how the parasites infect the brain from the blood, but it is suspected that they cross through the choroid plexus, a circumventricular organ.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)  

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that is caused by reactivation of a latent papovavirus (the JC polyomavirus) infection, that can cross the BBB. It affects immune-compromised patients and it is usually seen with patients suffering from AIDS.

De Vivo disease 

De Vivo disease (also known as GLUT1 deficiency syndrome) is a rare condition caused by inadequate transportation of the sugar glucose across the blood–brain barrier, resulting in developmental delays and other neurological problems. Genetic defects in glucose transporter type 1 (GLUT1) appears to be the primary cause of De Vivo disease.[48][49]

Alzheimer's disease 

Some evidence indicates[50] that disruption of the blood–brain barrier in Alzheimer's disease patients allows blood plasma containing amyloid beta (Aβ) to enter the brain where the Aβ adheres preferentially to the surface of astrocytes. These findings have led to the hypotheses that (1) breakdown of the blood–brain barrier allows access of neuron-binding autoantibodies and soluble exogenous Aβ42 to brain neurons and (2) binding of these auto-antibodies to neurons triggers and/or facilitates the internalization and accumulation of cell surface-bound Aβ42 in vulnerable neurons through their natural tendency to clear surface-bound autoantibodies via endocytosis. Eventually the astrocyte is overwhelmed, dies, ruptures, and disintegrates, leaving behind the insoluble Aβ42 plaque. Thus, in some patients, Alzheimer's disease may be caused (or more likely, aggravated) by a breakdown in the blood–brain barrier.[51]

Cerebral edema 

Cerebral edema is the accumulation of excess water in the extracellular space of the brain, which can result when hypoxia causes the blood–brain barrier to open.

Prion and prion-like diseases 

Many neurodegenerative diseases including alpha-synucleinopathies (Parkinson's, PSP, DLBP) and tauopathies (Alzheimer's) are thought to result from seeded misfolding from pathological extracellular protein variants. This prion-like hypothesis is gaining support in numerous studies in vitro and involving in vivo intracerebral injection of brain lysates, extracted protein (tau, alpha-synuclein) and synthetically generated fibers (PFFs in alpha-synucleinopathies). These proteins are also detectable in increasing amounts in the plasma of patients suffering from these conditions (particularly total alpha-synuclein in Parkinson's disease patients). The extent to which and the mechanisms by which these prion-like proteins can penetrate the blood–brain barrier is currently unknown.

HIV encephalitis 

It is believed[52] that latent HIV can cross the blood–brain barrier inside circulating monocytes in the bloodstream ("Trojan horse theory") within the first 14 days of infection. Once inside, these monocytes become activated and are transformed into macrophages. Activated macrophages release virions into the brain tissue proximate to brain microvessels. These viral particles likely attract the attention of sentinel brain microglia and perivascular macrophages initiating an inflammatory cascade that may cause a series of intracellular signaling in brain microvascular endothelial cells and damage the functional and structural integrity of the BBB.[53] This inflammation is HIV encephalitis (HIVE). Instances of HIVE probably occur throughout the course of AIDS and are a precursor for HIV-associated dementia (HAD). The premier model for studying HIV and HIVE is the simian model.

Rabies 

During lethal rabies infection of mice, the blood–brain barrier (BBB) does not allow anti-viral immune cells to enter the brain, the primary site of rabies virus replication. This aspect contributes to the pathogenicity of the virus and artificially increasing BBB permeability promotes viral clearance. Opening the BBB during rabies infection has been suggested as a possible novel approach to treating the disease, even though no attempts have yet been made to determine whether or not this treatment could be successful.[original research?]

History 

Paul Ehrlich was a bacteriologist studying staining, a procedure that is used in many microscopic studies to make fine biological structures visible using chemical dyes. As Ehrlich injected some of these dyes (notably the aniline dyes that were then widely used), the dye stained all of the organs of some kinds of animals except for their brains. At that time, Ehrlich attributed this lack of staining to the brain simply not picking up as much of the dye.[54]

However, in a later experiment in 1913, Edwin Goldmann (one of Ehrlich's students) injected the dye into the cerebro-spinal fluids of animals' brains directly. He found that in this case the brains did become dyed, but the rest of the body did not. This clearly demonstrated the existence of some sort of compartmentalization between the two. At that time, it was thought that the blood vessels themselves were responsible for the barrier, since no obvious membrane could be found. The concept of the blood–brain barrier (then termed hematoencephalic barrier) was proposed by a Berlin physician, Lewandowsky, in 1900.[55] It was not until the introduction of the scanning electron microscope to the medical research fields in the 1960s that the actual membrane could be observed and proved to exist.

 

 

References 

Jump up ^ Arthur M. Butt, Hazel C. Jones, and N. Joan Abbott (1990). "Electrical resistance across the blood–brain barrier in anaesthetized rats: a developmental study". Journal of Physiology 429: 47–62. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018243. PMID 2277354.

Jump up ^ Helga E. de Vries, Johan Kuiper, Albertus G. de Boer, Theo J. C. Van Berkel and Douwe D. Breimer (1997). "The Blood-Brain Barrier in Neuroinflammatory Diseases". Pharmacological Reviews 49 (2): 143–156. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018243. PMID 2277354.

Jump up ^ "About". Blood Brain Barrier. Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved 7 May 2013.

^ Jump up to: a b c Stamatovic, SM (2008). "Brain Endothelial Cell-Cell Junctions: How to "Open" the Blood Brain Barrier". Current Neuropharmacology 6 (3): 179–192. doi:10.2174/157015908785777210. PMC 2687937. PMID 19506719.

Jump up ^ Ballabh, P; Braun, A; Nedergaard, M (June 2004). "The blood–brain barrier: an overview: structure, regulation, and clinical implications". Neurobiology of disease 16 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2003.12.016. PMID 15207256.

^ Jump up to: a b Pardridge, William M. - The Blood-Brain Barrier: Bottleneck in Brain Drug Development - 2 January 2005. Retrieved 5 February 2014.

Jump up ^ Joan Abbott, N.; Rönnbäck, Lars; Hansson, Elisabeth (2006). "Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood–brain barrier". Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7: 41–53. doi:10.1038/nrn1824.

Jump up ^ Hamilton RD, Foss AJ, Leach L (2007). "Establishment of a human in–vitro model of the outer blood–retinal barrier". Journal of Anatomy 211 (6): 707–16. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00812.x. PMC 2375847. PMID 17922819.

Jump up ^ Pritchard, Thomas C.; Alloway, Kevin Douglas (1999). Medical Neuroscience (Google books preview). Hayes Barton Press. pp. 76–77. ISBN 1-889325-29-5. Retrieved 2009-02-08.

Jump up ^ Gilgun-Sherki, Yossi; Melamed, Eldad; Offen, Daniel (2001). "Oxidative stress induced-neurodegenerative diseases: the need for antioxidants that penetrate the blood brain barrier". Neuropharmacology 40 (8): 959–975. doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00019-3. ISSN 0028-3908. PMID 11406187.

Jump up ^ Tsai, C.E.; Daood, M.J.; Lane, R.H.; Hansen, T.W.R; Gruetzmacher, E.M.; Watchko, J.F. (2002). "P-Glycoprotein Expression in Mouse Brain Increases with Maturation". Neonatology 81 (1): 58–64. doi:10.1159/000047185.

^ Jump up to: a b Braun, Leon D; Cornford, Eain M; Oldendorf, William H (2006). "Newborn Rabbit Blood–Brain Barrier Is Selectively Permeable and Differs Substantially from the Adult". Journal of Neurochemistry 34: 147–152. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1980.tb04633.x.

^ Jump up to: a b c d e Raza, MW; Shad, A; Pedler, SJ; Karamat, KA (2005). "Penetration and activity of antibiotics in brain abscess". Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP 15 (3): 165–7. PMID 15808097.

Jump up ^ Pardridge, William M (2011). "Drug transport in brain via the cerebrospinal fluid". Fluids Barriers CNS 8: 7. doi:10.1186/2045-8118-8-7. PMC 3042981. PMID 21349155.

Jump up ^ Chen, Y (2013). "Novel modified method for injection into the cerebrospinal fluid via the cerebellomedullary cistern in mice". Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 73 (2): 304–11. PMID 23823990.

Jump up ^ Tortora, Gerard J.; Berdell R. Funke; Christine L. Case (2010). Microbiology: An Introduction. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings. p. 439,611. ISBN 0-321-55007-2.

Jump up ^ Nizet, V; KS, Kim; M, Stins; M, Jonas; EY, Chi; D, Nguyen; CE, Rubens (1997). "Invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells by group B streptococci.". Infection and Immunity 65 (12): 5074–5081. PMC 175731. PMID 9393798.

Jump up ^ Zysk, Gregor (2001). "Pneumolysin Is the Main Inducer of Cytotoxicity to Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells Caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae". Infection and Immunity 69 (2): 845–852. doi:10.1128/IAI.69.2.845-852.2001. PMC 97961. PMID 11159977.

Jump up ^ Van Sorge, Nina M (2012). "Defense at the border: the blood–brain barrier versus bacterial foreigners". Future Microbiol 7 (3): 383–394. doi:10.2217/fmb.12.1. PMC 3589978. PMID 22393891.

Jump up ^ Tortora, Gerard J.; Berdell R. Funke; Christine L. Case (2010). Microbiology: An Introduction. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings. pp. 616–618. ISBN 0-321-55007-2.

Jump up ^ McDannold, Nathan; Vykhodtseva, Natalia; Hynynen, Kullervo (May 2008). "Blood–brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound and circulating preformed microbubbles appears to be characterized by the mechanical index". Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (Elsevier) 34 (5): 834–840. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.10.016. PMC 2442477. PMID 18207311.

Jump up ^ Wiley, Devin (2013). "Transcytosis and brain uptake of transferrin-containing nanoparticles by tuning avidity to transferrin receptor.". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110 ((21)): 8662–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.1307152110. PMC 3666717. PMID 23650374.

Jump up ^ Paris-Robidas S, Emond V, Tremblay C, Soulet D, Calon F (July 2011). "In vivo labeling of brain capillary endothelial cells after intravenous injection of monoclonal antibodies targeting the transferrin receptor". Molecular Pharmacology 80 (1): 32–9. doi:10.1124/mol.111.071027. PMID 21454448.

Jump up ^ Krol, Silke; MacRez, Richard; Docagne, Fabian; Defer, Gilles; Laurent, Sophie; Rahman, Masoud; Hajipour, Mohammad J.; Kehoe, Patrick G.; Mahmoudi, Morteza (2013). "Therapeutic Benefits from Nanoparticles: The Potential Significance of Nanoscience in Diseases with Compromise to the Blood Brain Barrier". Chemical Reviews 113 (3): 1877–1903. doi:10.1021/cr200472g. PMID 23157552.

Jump up ^ Silva, GA (December 2008). "Nanotechnology approaches to crossing the blood–brain barrier and drug delivery to the CNS". BMC Neuroscience 9: S4. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-S3-S4. PMC 2604882. PMID 19091001.

Jump up ^ Brigger, I.; Morizet, J; Aubert, G; Chacun, H; Terrier-Lacombe, MJ; Couvreur, P; Vassal, G (December 2002). "Poly(ethylene glycol)-coated hexadecylcyanoacrylate nanospheres display a combined effect for brain tumor targeting". J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 303 (3): 928–36. doi:10.1124/jpet.102.039669. PMID 12438511.

Jump up ^ Nair, Madhavan; Guduru, Rakesh; Liang, Ping; Hong, Jeongmin; Sagar, Vidya; Khizroev, Sakhrat (June 2005). "Externally-controlled on-demand release of anti-HIV drug AZTTP using magneto-electric nanoparticles as carriers". Nature Communications 4 (4): 1707–1714. doi:10.1002/jps.20357. PMID 15858853.

Jump up ^ Hashizume, Hiroya; Baluk, Peter; Morikawa, Shunichi; McLean, John W.; Thurston, Gavin; Roberge, Sylvie; Jain, Rakesh K.; McDonald, Donald M. (April 2000). "Openings between Defective Endothelial Cells Explain Tumor Vessel Leakiness". American Journal of Pathology 156 (4): 1363–1380. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65006-7. PMC 1876882. PMID 10751361.

Jump up ^ Schneider, Stefan W.; Ludwig, Thomas; Tatenhorst, Lars; Braune, Stephan; Oberleithner, Hans; Senner, Volker; Paulus, Werner (March 2004). "Glioblastoma cells release factors that disrupt blood–brain barrier features". Acta Neuropathologica 107 (3): 272–276. doi:10.1007/s00401-003-0810-2. PMID 14730455.

Jump up ^ Van Dorpe, S; Bronselaer, A; Nielandt, J; Stalmans, S; Wynendaele, E; Audenaert, K; Wiele, C; Burvenich, C; Peremans, K; Hsuchou, H; Tré, G; Spiegeleer, B (2012). "Brainpeps: The blood–brain barrier peptide database". Brain structure & function 217 (3): 687–718. doi:10.1007/s00429-011-0375-0. PMID 22205159.

Jump up ^ "Transport at the Blood Brain Barrier". Davis Lab. Retrieved 5 January 2015.

Jump up ^ Ermisch, A (1983). "On the Blood-Brain Barrier to Peptides: [3H]βCasomorphin-5 Uptake by Eighteen Brain Regions In Vivo". Journal of Neurochemistry 41 (5): 1229–1233. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1983.tb00816.x. PMID 6619862.

Jump up ^ Beam, T. R.; Allen, J. C. (December 1977). "Blood, Brain, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Concentrations of Several Antibiotics in Rabbits with Intact and Inflamed Meninges". Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 12 (6): 710–6. doi:10.1128/AAC.12.6.710. PMC 430009. PMID 931369.

Jump up ^ Tortora, Gerard J.; Berdell R. Funke; Christine L. Case (2010). Microbiology: An Introduction. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings. p. 615. ISBN 0-321-55007-2.

Jump up ^ Nordqvist, Christian (2010-04-16). "What Is A Brain Abscess (Cerebral Abscess)?". MNT Knowledge Center. Medical News Today. Archived from the original on 2010-04-18.

Jump up ^ Oby, Emily; Janigro, Damir (2006). "The Blood–Brain Barrier and Epilepsy". Epilepsia 47 (11): 1761–1774. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00817.x. ISSN 0013-9580. PMID 17116015.

Jump up ^ Marchi, Nicola; Angelov, Lilyana; Masaryk, Thomas; Fazio, Vincent; Granata, Tiziana; Hernandez, Nadia; Hallene, Kerri; Diglaw, Tammy; Franic, Linda; Najm, Imad; Janigro, Damir (2007). "Seizure-Promoting Effect of Blood?Brain Barrier Disruption". Epilepsia 48 (4): 732–42. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.00988.x. PMID 17319915.

Jump up ^ Seiffert, E.; Dreier, JP; Ivens, S; Bechmann, I; Tomkins, O; Heinemann, U; Friedman, A (2004). "Lasting Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Induces Epileptic Focus in the Rat Somatosensory Cortex". Journal of Neuroscience 24 (36): 7829–36. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1751-04.2004. PMID 15356194.

Jump up ^ Uva, L.; Librizzi, L.; Marchi, N.; Noe, F.; Bongiovanni, R.; Vezzani, A.; Janigro, D.; De Curtis, M. (2008). "Acute induction of epileptiform discharges by pilocarpine in the in vitro isolated guinea-pig brain requires enhancement of blood–brain barrier permeability". Neuroscience 151 (1): 303–12. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.10.037. PMC 2774816. PMID 18082973.

Jump up ^ Van Vliet, E. A.; Da Costa Araujo, S.; Redeker, S.; Van Schaik, R.; Aronica, E.; Gorter, J. A. (2007). "Blood–brain barrier leakage may lead to progression of temporal lobe epilepsy". Brain 130 (2): 521–534. doi:10.1093/brain/awl318.

Jump up ^ Ivens, S.; Kaufer, D.; Flores, L. P; Bechmann, I.; Zumsteg, D.; Tomkins, O.; Seiffert, E.; Heinemann, U.; Friedman, A. (2007). "TGF-beta receptor-mediated albumin uptake into astrocytes is involved in neocortical epileptogenesis". Brain 130 (Pt 2): 535–47. doi:10.1093/brain/awl317. PMID 17121744.

Jump up ^ Awasthi, Sanjay; Hallene, Kerri L; Fazio, Vince; Singhal, Sharad S; Cucullo, Luca; Awasthi, Yogesh C; Dini, Gabriele; Janigro, Damir (2005). "RLIP76, a non-ABC transporter, and drug resistance in epilepsy". BMC Neuroscience 6: 61. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-6-61. PMC 1249579. PMID 16188027.

Jump up ^ Löscher, Wolfgang; Potschka, Heidrun (2005). "Drug resistance in brain diseases and the role of drug efflux transporters". Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6 (8): 591–602. doi:10.1038/nrn1728. PMID 16025095.

Jump up ^ Waubant, Emmanuelle (2006). "Biomarkers indicative of blood–brain barrier disruption in multiple sclerosis". Disease Markers 22 (4): 235–44. doi:10.1155/2006/709869. PMC 3850823. PMID 17124345.

Jump up ^ Schinkel AH (April 1999). "P-Glycoprotein, a gatekeeper in the blood–brain barrier". Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 36 (2-3): 179–194. doi:10.1016/S0169-409X(98)00085-4. PMID 10837715.

Jump up ^ Schreibelt, G; Musters, RJ; Reijerkerk, A; De Groot, LR; Van Der Pol, SM; Hendrikx, EM; Döpp, ED; Dijkstra, CD; Drukarch, B; De Vries, HE (August 2006). "Lipoic acid affects cellular migration into the central nervous system and stabilizes blood–brain barrier integrity". J. Immunol. 177 (4): 2630–7. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.4.2630. PMID 16888025.

Jump up ^ Lennon, V. A.; Kryzer, TJ; Pittock, SJ; Verkman, AS; Hinson, SR (August 2005). "IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel". J. Exp. Med. 202 (4): 473–7. doi:10.1084/jem.20050304. PMC 2212860. PMID 16087714.

Jump up ^ Pascual, J.; Wang, D; Lecumberri, B; Yang, H; Mao, X; Yang, R; De Vivo, DC (May 2004). "GLUT1 deficiency and other glucose transporter diseases". European journal of endocrinology 150 (5): 627–33. doi:10.1530/eje.0.1500627. PMID 15132717.

Jump up ^ Klepper, Jörg; Voit, Thomas (June 2002). "Facilitated glucose transporter protein type 1 (GLUT1) deficiency syndrome: impaired glucose transport into brain—a review". European journal of pediatrics 161 (6): 295–304. doi:10.1007/s00431-002-0939-3. PMID 12029447.

Jump up ^ Zipser, BD; Johanson, CE; Gonzalez, L; Berzin, TM; Tavares, R; Hulette, CM; Vitek, MP; Hovanesian, V; Stopa, EG (2007). "Microvascular injury and blood–brain barrier leakage in Alzheimer's disease". Neurobiology of Aging 28 (7): 977–86. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.05.016. PMID 16782234.

Jump up ^ Nagele, Robert G. (2006). "Alzheimer's disease: new mechanisms for an old problem". University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. Retrieved 2011-07-22.

Jump up ^ Williams, Kenneth C.; Hickey, William F. (2002). "CENTRALNERVOUSSYSTEMDAMAGE, MONOCYTES ANDMACROPHAGES, ANDNEUROLOGICALDISORDERS INAIDS". Annual Review of Neuroscience 25 (1): 537–562. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142822. ISSN 0147-006X. PMID 12052920.

Jump up ^ Ivey, Nathan S; MacLean, Andrew G; Lackner, Andrew A (2009). "AIDS and the Blood Brain Barrier". Journal of Neurovirology 2 (2): 111–122. doi:10.1080/13550280902769764. PMC 2744422. PMID 19306229.

Jump up ^ "History of Blood-Brain Barrier". Davis Lab. Retrieved 5 January 2015.

Jump up ^ "History of Blood-Brain Barrier". The Davis Lab. University of Arizona. Archived from the original on 2012-04-25. Retrieved 2014-03-01.

Blaschko's lines




Blaschko's lines, also called the Lines of Blaschko, named after Alfred Blaschko, are lines of normal cell development in the skin. These lines are invisible under normal conditions. They become apparent when some diseases of the skin or mucosa manifest themselves according to these patterns. They follow a "V" shape over the back, "S" shaped whirls over the chest, and sides, and wavy shapes on the head.  

The lines are believed to trace the migration of embryonic cells.   The stripes are a type of genetic mosaicism.   They do not correspond to nervous, muscular, or lymphatic systems. The lines can be observed in other animals such as cats and dogs.  

German dermatologist Alfred Blaschko is credited for the first demonstration of these lines in 1901.  

Popular Posts

Popular Posts

Popular Posts

Popular Posts

Translate

Blog Archive

Blog Archive

Featured Post

  ABSTRACT Doxorubicin (Dox) is a highly potent chemotherapy drug. Despite its efficacy, Dox's clinical application is limited due to it...