المرجو من الزائرين للصفحة دعمنا بالاعجاب و التعليق و المشاركة Les pedimos amablemente a los visitantes de esta página que nos apoyen dándole "me gusta", comentando y compartiendo. We kindly ask visitors to this page to support us by liking, commenting, and sharing. Мы просим посетителей этой страницы поддержать нас, поставив лайк, оставив комментарий и поделившись информацией. 이 페이지를 방문하신 분들께서는 좋아요, 댓글, 공유를 통해 저희를 지원해 주시기 바랍니다. 懇請各位訪客透過按讚、留言和分享來支持我們。 このページの訪問者の皆様には、いいね、コメント、シェアなどでサポートしていただきますようお願いいたします。 हम इस पेज पर आने वाले आगंतुकों से अनुरोध करते हैं कि वे इसे लाइक, कमेंट और शेयर करके हमारा समर्थन करें। Nous demandons gentiment aux visiteurs de cette page de nous soutenir en aimant, commentant et partageant.

Translate

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Search This Blog

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy are a high risk of VTE, yet the importance of thromboprophylaxis for

 


Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy are a high risk of VTE, yet the importance of thromboprophylaxis for cancer patients that are at high risk of developing VTE is still controversial.

AIM: To calculate the benefits and harms of thromboprophylaxis, compared to placebo, in ambulatory high-risk cancer patients that are receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, WANFANG Data, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese Scientific Journal Database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) describing benefits and harms of thromboprophylaxis. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata software (version 15.1).

RESULTS: We included six studies, which contained a total of 3240 cancer patients with thromboprophylaxis and 2874 cancer patients without thromboprophylaxis. Thromboprophylaxis was effective in high-risk patients with two points or higher (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.71, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.526). It was associated with an increase in bleeding events (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.14-2.40, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.498) and was mainly efficient in reducing the risk of pulmonary embolism (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.96, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.263). The risk of major (RR 1.85, 95% CI 0.87-3.94, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.888) and non-major (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.96-2.62, I2 = 16.3%, P = 0.303) bleeding showed no significant difference with or without thromboprophylaxis. There was no reduction in all-cause mortality with thromboprophylaxis (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78-1.18, I2 = 22.0%, P = 0.277).

CONCLUSION: Thromoboprophylaxis is effective and safe in cancer patients that are at high risk for developing VTE with chemotherapy.

PMID: 32246324 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

13:08

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

256×256, 6.0 KB

13:08

In reply to this message

pubmed: caandvteortroorpul

Observational Multicenter Study on the Prognostic Relevance of Coagulation Activation in Risk Assessment and Stratification in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Outline of the ARIAS Trial.


Related Articles

Observational Multicenter Study on the Prognostic Relevance of Coagulation Activation in Risk Assessment and Stratification in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Outline of the ARIAS Trial.


Cancers (Basel). 2020 Apr 01;12(4):


Authors: Pizzuti L, Krasniqi E, Mandoj C, Marinelli D, Sergi D, Capomolla E, Paoletti G, Botti C, Kayal R, Ferranti FR, Sperduti I, Perracchio L, Sanguineti G, Marchetti P, Ciliberto G, Barchiesi G, Mazzotta M, Barba M, Conti L, Vici P

No comments:

Post a Comment

اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع