more commonly seen in ulcerative colitis or diverticular disease. Each of these will be outlined in the
following sections. Despite improvements in medical therapy, over 70% of all Crohn patients will
require surgery at some point in their lives, with almost half of those undergoing one operation
requiring additional procedures. Therefore, having a firm understanding of the general principles and
technical specifics is important to surgeons who care for these patients.
General Principles
3 While Crohn disease can affect the entire GI tract from mouth to anus, certain overriding principles
can help guide the planning and operative management. First, Crohn disease is a process marked by
lifelong potential for recurrence; therefore, preservation of bowel when possible and consideration of
future function are paramount concerns during the planning phase.74 Next, the extent of resection
required is dependent on multiple factors, including location and duration of disease, ability to exclude
malignancy, and prior resections that may have resulted in shortened small bowel. In addition, as the
stools tend to be loose, consideration must be given to rectal compliance and sphincter function during
surgical planning to avoid a “perineal colostomy,” whereby in-continuity management is preserved but
the patient has no control. Furthermore, unlike ulcerative colitis, segmental resection for both small and
large bowel is common with ileocolonic, colo-colonic, and rectal anastomoses all playing a role in
avoiding a permanent stoma while maximizing functional bowel.75 Crohn patients with pancolitis may
undergo a total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (for those with rectal-sparing) or total
proctocolectomy with end ileostomy.76 Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is
typically discouraged, and is normally the result of an initial misdiagnosis of ulcerative colitis.
4 Technical tips also come into play when planning for Crohn resections. For example, when
performing a proctectomy, it is important to consider the potential for a delayed or nonhealed perineal
wound. An intersphincteric dissection, which maximizes the amount of healthy muscle/tissue remaining,
facilitates closure in attempt to avoid this complication. Some patients will require more extensive
procedures such as flaps that utilize adjacent tissues (i.e., gracilis, bulbocavernosus), and may require
plastic surgeon involvement.77 In addition, as in the small bowel, length of resection margins does not
influence the risk of relapse with segmental resections, and only grossly normal bowel is all that is
required.78 Finally, diversion may be more commonly used due to both the presence of active disease as
well as the potential negative healing effects of the Crohn medications.
ABDOMINAL FISTULAS
Intra-abdominal fistulas may arise from either the small or large bowel and affect nearly every adjacent
structure. Similar to any fistula, it is important to determine the site of origin of the fistula, as this
section of bowel will typically require a formal resection when symptomatic (Fig. 50-14). On the other
hand, a section of bowel may simply be involved in the process secondarily as a “bystander,” and the
preferred treatment is to take the fistula down and primarily repair the site. It is important to ensure
there is no significant active disease at the closure site, as this may predispose to healing problems and
a subsequent leak. In this case, the preferred strategy would be to perform a segmental resection.79
Transmural bowel inflammation and communication can also occur more commonly with the skin,
bladder, or vagina. Once again, the bowel is the offending organ and should be resected, while ligation
of the fistula and closure of the secondarily involved organ is adequate treatment. In certain cases, the
inflammatory process is so intense, or there is a concern for concomitant malignancy, that the entire
process should be resected en bloc. When an abscess is present, it is often preferable to percutaneously
drain the abscess and ensure adequate medical therapy (that often includes biologics), prior to
embarking on abdominal exploration.80 Finally, asymptomatic entero-enteric or entero-colonic fistulas
are often best left alone and treated medically, especially with the relative success of anti-TNF agents.81
1300
Figure 50-14. Entero-enteric-colonic fistula.
OBSTRUCTION AND STRICTURE
Strictures in Crohn disease most commonly occur in the terminal ileum, but may arise anywhere along
the GI tract (Fig. 50-15). Due to the transmural inflammation, it is not uncommon to have luminal
narrowing within the bowel especially with repeated flares. However, the underlying pathophysiology
may be from a phlegmonous/inflammatory process or secondary to the fibrostenotic pattern of disease.
In the former, medical management may be successful, decreasing the inflammation and resolving the
intrinsic or extrinsic “compression” on the bowel wall. On the other hand, patients with fibrotic
strictures typically have little to no response to medical management (including anti-TNF agents) and
most often require surgery.82–84 Emerging evidence suggests early treatment of strictures with
aggressive biologic therapy may aid in preventing the onset of fibrosis, especially in patients under 40,
prior to the onset of the irreversible cascade of fibrosis where surgery becomes inevitable.85
Figure 50-15. Endoscopic balloon passing through the ileocecal valve to dilate a stricture.
Strictures also differ somewhat based on their location. The rate of colonic strictures has been
reported to be as high as 7% to 17%.86 In general, these benign strictures are responsive to medical
management as well as endoscopic dilation for moderate-to-high–grade stenosis. Complicating the
situation, malignancy has been shown to be present in ∼7% of all colonic strictures,87 and Crohn
disease carries an increased risk of colorectal cancer above the general population. Furthermore, it is
very difficult to differentiate malignant from benign strictures on strictly clinical basis. Therefore all
colonic strictures should undergo endoscopic evaluation and biopsy. If malignancy is detected (or the
lesion appears worrisome and remains indeterminate on work-up), a standard oncologic resection
should normally be performed. For those that are clearly benign and nonresponsive to medical
management, endoscopic dilation has been shown to provide symptomatic relief. Technical success
occurs in ∼70% to 90%, and provides initial symptomatic resolution in over 80% of patients.88
Unfortunately, most patients with colonic strictures require repeated dilations. The procedure is
generally safe, with hemorrhage and perforation occurring in <5%, and most often occur when balloon
sizes over 25 mm are used. Although concomitant direct injection of the stricture with steroids or
treatment with systemic steroids immediately after dilation have both demonstrated some success in
1301
case series, the true effect of this remains uncertain.
Strictures of the small bowel have been reported in 20% to 40% of Crohn patients.89 Treatment
typically consists of medical management, though depending on the severity, many patients will require
intervention. Small bowel strictures are often amenable to dilation via double-balloon enteroscopy,
especially in the 10- to 20-mm range, though perforation is a known risk.90,91 Symptomatic relief occurs
in ∼75% to 90% following the first dilation, while approximately 30% to 40% will require repeated
intervention over the next 3 years. For those with initial success, the cumulative dilation-free rate at 3
years is ∼40% to 50%.92 Overall complications occur in ∼10% to 15% (<5% major complications),
and include pain, fistula, fevers, bleeding, and perforation.93 Despite this success, many will require
operative intervention when symptoms fail to resolve, repeated bouts occur, or when a stricture is
associated with a nonresolving inflammatory process, malnutrition, immunosuppression or fistula.
Options then include strictureplasty (see below) or resection.
Strictureplasty preserves bowel length by avoiding resection altogether. The Heineke–Mikulicz
method involves a longitudinal incision along the antimesenteric border of the bowel with a transverse
closure, and is useful for shorter segments of bowel. Additional techniques include the Finney
strictureplasty, classically used for longer strictures of 7 to 15 cm in length, where the diseased segment
is opened longitudinally, the bowel is folded upon itself, and a full-thickness anastomosis is formed. In
another method, an isoperistaltic strictureplasty is constructed such that the narrowed diseased portion
of the bowel is anastomosed to the dilated segment of an adjacent loop in a side-to-side manner.
Complications have been reported in 4% to 15% in large series, and include obstruction, bleeding,
sepsis, perforation, and death.94,95 Overall, 5-year recurrence rates for strictureplasty in jejunoileal and
ileocolonic locations have been reported between 25% and 30%, including an ∼3% site-specific
recurrence. Similar to endoscopic dilation, malnutrition, presence of a phlegmon/perforation/fistula at
the site, multiple strictures within a small segment, and suspicion of a malignancy are all
contraindications to strictureplasty.96
Strictures at prior anastomotic sites may occur from recurrent disease or secondary to technical
problems. They are often amenable to dilation,97 yet they are often fibrotic in nature and
nonresponsive, thus requiring resection for symptomatic strictures. To prevent this, evidence from
systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggests that side-to-side stapled anastomoses in Crohn patients
undergoing an ileocolonic resection have a decreased rate of postoperative complications (OR = 0.54),
leak (OR = 0.45), recurrent (OR = 0.2), and reoperation (OR = 0.18) when compared to hand-sewn
end-to-end anastomoses.98,99
MALIGNANCY
5 Historically, the risk of malignancy with Crohn disease was felt to be only slightly higher than the
general population and significantly lower than the risk of patients with ulcerative colitis.100 More
recently, population-based data suggest that the cancer risk with long-standing Crohn’s is ∼4- to 20-fold
above that of the average population, and equivalent to patients with ulcerative colitis. Known risk
factors for malignancy include pancolitis (at least one-third) and a disease duration of >8 years.101–103
Endoscopic surveillance strategies to detect malignancy have had to date mixed results.104 Data from a
large meta-analysis found that surveillance colonoscopy has not shown to effect survival in these
patients, though lesions are typically detected earlier.105,106
The optimal surveillance strategy for patients with Crohn disease has not been determined. As such,
most recommendations favor mimicking surveillance for ulcerative colitis in patients with Crohn colitis.
In this algorithm, surveillance colonoscopy begins 8 years after disease onset for pancolitis and 15 years
for patients with left-sided disease, and is repeated every 1 to 2 years. In addition, the American Society
for GI Endoscopy, American College of Gastroenterology, and American Gastroenterological Association
were unable to draw conclusions regarding the benefit or need to perform random surveillance
biopsies.107–109 Treatment for malignancy in the Crohn patient is similar to that of the general
population, with resection following standard oncologic principles. As synchronous and metachronous
lesions have been reported in up to 10%, consideration should be given to a subtotal colectomy with
ileorectal anastomosis in the absence of rectal lesions.
While most evidence is from patients with ulcerative colitis, a polyp in a setting of colitis
(nonadenoma dysplasia–associated lesion or mass-DALM) has traditionally felt to carry a significant risk
of malignancy and is a strong indication for a formal resection.101,110–113 While these nonadenoma-like
1302
DALMs should typically undergo a colectomy, more recent evidence suggests that complete endoscopic
excision of an adenoma-like DALM (i.e., a sporadic adenoma occurring in a patient with colitis with or
without active disease) may be safely undergo a surveillance protocol.114 Low-grade dysplasia outside
the setting of a nonadenoma-like DALM, and even in areas flat mucosa, warrants close follow-up,
although the need for follow-up resection remains unproven.101,113
HEMORRHAGE
Patients with Crohn may complain of bloody stools, however, frank hemorrhage in Crohndisease is
fairly uncommon. Possible sources include deep ulcerations, toxic colitis, an underlying mass, or
concomitant diverticular bleed. Significant upper GI bleeding is also rare, and likely from a secondary
source other than Crohn’s (e.g., ulcer, varices, esophageal tear, malignancy). Similar to any other
patient with a significant GI hemorrhage, patients require continued resuscitation, correction of any
coagulopathy, and transfusion as indicated. Adjunctive measures such as intravascular vasopressin and
infliximab have also been described,115,116 though should not be considered first-line agents. Endoscopy
is the most useful diagnostic and therapeutic maneuver for bleeding from either an upper or lower
source. When endoscopy or medical therapy is unsuccessful or bleeding recurs, segmental resection is
preferred when the source is localized in the large or small bowel. In the setting of unlocalized disease,
every effort should be made to identify the source of bleeding, including upper and lower endoscopies,
nuclear medicine scans, angiography, and small bowel evaluation (push endoscopy, video capsule
endoscopy, or small bowel follow-through). However in the unstable or nonlocalizable lower source, a
subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy may be required.117 In the case of upper GI bleeding, the source
may be localized and controlled with endoscopy or may require a resection or ligation as in patients
without Crohn disease depending on the underlying pathology.
SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS
Gastroduodenal Disease
As stated, gastroduodenal disease occurs in 0.5% to 4% of all Crohn patients. The most common
indications likely to require advanced or surgical intervention involve stricture/obstruction, fistula or
bleeding. Isolated gastric disease is even more rare,118 as the stomach will hardly ever be the sole
source for the patient’s complaints. It is important to exclude H. pylori infection, gastritis (NSAIDs),
ulcers, and malignancy in the absence of disease elsewhere in the GI tract. Most patients will respond to
medical management, especially with the anti–TNF-α therapy.119 Gastric outlet obstruction at the level
of the pylorus and first portion of the duodenum is often amenable to endoscopic balloon dilation, with
avoidance of surgery in approximately half of patients.120
Duodenal strictures are more frequent with disease in this location, and case series have demonstrated
successful amelioration of symptoms with endoscopic dilation.121 More often, symptomatic duodenal
strictures nonresponsive to medical therapy will be managed by strictureplasty, resection, or to a lesser
extent, bypass (i.e., gastrojejujostomy). As previously noted, the type of strictureplasty will depend on
the location, status of the surrounding tissues (i.e., ability to mobilize), and length of the stricture.122
Fistulas typically arise from disease located more distally in the small bowel, and therefore require
resection of the primary site with closure of the stomach or duodenum. Occasionally the upper tract is
the original of the fistula and resection or bypass is required. With appropriate expertise, a laparoscopic
approach has been associated with fewer complications and improved recovery. If bypass is performed,
vagotomy is not needed; however, every effort should be made to avoid bypass if possible, as this is
associated with worsening diarrhea and nutritional abnormalities.123 For those cases where resection or
closure of the duodenum is required, a jejunal serosal patch or Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy may help
minimizing wound breakdown and recurrent fistulas.124
Small Bowel Disease
Most small bowel disease is amenable to surgical resection and primary anastomosis. As stated,
strictureplasty is another option for those patients with short bowel, multiple sites of noncontiguous
disease, and early recurrence – especially for those with noninflammatory patterns. Following resection,
consideration should be given to the nutritional status of the patient, medications, and overall
1303
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع