Figure 74-20. Benefits of radiation therapy and tamoxifen in ductal carcinoma in situ. The cumulative incidence of breast cancer
events in the ipsilateral and contralateral breasts for patients treated in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B17 and B-24 trials is shown. The reduction in recurrence is greatest for patients receiving radiotherapy and tamoxifen.
AJCC TNM Staging
The seventh edition of the AJCC TNM staging system for breast cancer is an internationally accepted
system used to characterize the extent of disease, predict prognosis, and facilitate medical decisionmaking (Table 74-10).176 In this system, breast cancer is classified on the basis of the primary tumor
type (invasive or in situ) and size (T), the presence or absence of regional lymph node involvement (N),
and the presence or absence of distant metastases (M).
Noninvasive breast cancers are noted as Tis and further classified into Tis (DCIS), Tis (LCIS), and Tis
(Paget). T1 tumors are invasive cancers ≤20 mm; T2 tumors are >20 mm but ≤50 mm; whereas T3
tumors are >50 mm. T4 tumors are of any size with direct extension to the chest wall and or the skin,
resulting in nodules or ulcerations. Invasion of cancer into the dermis alone does not qualify as T4.
Lymph node classification criteria differ depending on whether the lymph nodes were clinically or
pathologically assessed and as such are designated as cN or pN, respectively. When possible, pathologic
classification is preferred. Regional lymph nodes are defined as those of the ipsilateral axilla, ipsilateral
intramammary, internal mammary nodes, and supraclavicular nodes. Metastasis to any other lymph
node, including cervical or to the contralateral axillary lymph node, is classified as distant disease (M1).
In regard to the clinical classification of the regional lymph nodes, cN0 refers to no regional lymph node
metastases. Mobile level I and II axillary lymph nodes containing metastases are considered cN1,
whereas fixed or matted nodes are cN2. When metastases occur in the infraclavicular lymph nodes,
ipsilateral internal mammary lymph nodes and axillary lymph nodes, or to the ipsilateral supraclavicular
lymph nodes, it is classified as cN3.
In order to discuss the pathologic classification of regional lymph nodes, it is important to note that
breast cancer metastases must be greater than 0.2 mm and exceed 200 cells in a single histologic lymph
node cross-section to be considered clinically relevant. As such, pN0 refers to no regional lymph node
metastases, pN1mi is used to describe micrometastases (>0.2 mm or >200 cells, but none >2.0 mm),
and pN1 is used to describe metastases in one to three lymph nodes and/or internal mammary nodes
with metastases detected by SLN biopsy but not clinically detected. pN2 disease occurs when metastases
are present in four to nine axillary lymph nodes or in clinically detected internal mammary lymph nodes
in the absence of axillary lymph node metastases. pN3 disease includes metastases in 10 or more
axillary lymph nodes, metastases to the infraclavicular (level III axillary) lymph nodes, in clinically
detected ipsilateral internal mammary lymph nodes in the presence of one or more positive level I or II
axillary lymph nodes, in more than three axillary lymph nodes and in internal mammary lymph nodes
with micrometastases or macrometastases detected by SLN biopsy but not clinically detected, or in
ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes.
Distant metastasis (M1) is defined as detectable metastases as determined by classical clinical and
radiographic means and/or histologically proven larger than 0.2 mm. When no clinical or radiographic
evidence of distant metastases is present but deposits of molecularly or microscopically detected tumor
cells are found in circulating blood, bone marrow, or other nonregional nodal tissue that is no larger
than 0.2 mm in a patient with no symptoms of metastases, the designation used is cMO(i+).
The particular combination of the T, N, and M characteristics defines the overall breast cancer stage.
Although the TNM staging system estimates predicted survival, it should not be used alone to dictate
treatment.
2064
Histologic Subtype and Tumor Grade
Most invasive breast cancers arise from epithelial elements and are categorized as carcinomas,
consisting of several histologic subtypes. Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results
(SEER) database of the National Cancer Institute between 1992 and 2001, estimated percentages of each
histologic subtype of breast cancer in a series involving 135,157 women showed infiltrating ductal
carcinoma (IDC) as the most common (76%), followed by invasive lobular (8%), ductal/lobular (7%),
mucinous/colloid (2.4%), tubular (1.5%), medullary (1.2%), and then papillary (1%).211
Infiltrating ductal carcinoma is the most common type of invasive breast cancer. On gross pathologic
evaluation, these lesions are typically firm, gray–white, gritty masses. Cytologic features of these cells
range from low grade to highly malignant. Microscopically, these cancers are characterized by cords
and nests of tumors cells with varying amounts of gland formation. As these cancer cells infiltrate the
breast parenchyma, they induce a fibrous response, resulting in their characteristic irregular, stellate
shape. Often, IDC is associated with a variable amount of DCIS.
STAGING
Table 74-10 Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) Classification for Breast Cancer
Staging
2065
Infiltrating lobular carcinomas (ILCs) are the second most common type of breast cancer. The
incidence rate of lobular carcinoma is rising faster than the rate of ductal carcinoma in the United
States. Furthermore, postmenopausal hormone therapy use may be more strongly associated with
lobular carcinoma than with ductal carcinoma. Although some ILCs may appear similar to IDC
macroscopically, others may not show a mass lesion with the excised tissue appearing normal or having
only a slightly firm consistency. As such, the microscopic size of ILC may be much greater than what is
measured grossly. Unlike IDC, ILC induces only a minimal fibrous reaction. Microscopically, these
tumors are characterized by small cells that insidiously infiltrate the mammary stroma and adipose
tissue individually and in a single file pattern, often growing in a target-like configuration around
normal breast ducts. LCIS or DCIS may be present with ILC. There is a higher frequency of bilateral and
multicentric disease with ILC than with IDC.212,213 Infiltrating lobular carcinomas are more common in
older women and are typically larger but more differentiated than IDC. Infiltrating lobular carcinomas
are almost always ER-positive. The prognosis for ILC and IDC appears to be similar; however, recent
reports suggest that the short-term prognosis for ILC may be more favorable.214,215 Infiltrating lobular
carcinomas tend to metastasize later than IDC and spread to unusual locations such as the peritoneum,
meninges, and the gastrointestinal tract.216 Furthermore, lobular breast cancers have been observed in
2066
families that carry germline mutations in CDH1, the gene that encodes for the E-cadherin protein. The
lack of E-cadherin can be used to distinguish ILC from IDC.217,218
Mucinous (colloid) carcinoma is a less common histologic subtype that is more common in older
patients. On gross examination, these tumors have a soft gelatinous appearance and tend to be well
circumscribed. Microscopically, they are characterized by nests of tumor cells, with uniform and lowgrade nuclei, dispersed in large pools of extracellular mucus. These lesions have a favorable
prognosis.219,220 Another histologic subtype with favorable prognosis is tubular carcinoma, which is
characterized by the presence of well-formed tubular or glandular structures infiltrating the stroma. The
tumor cells are low grade and are often associated with low-grade DCIS. Metastatic disease is rare with
tubular carcinoma.221
Medullary carcinomas are well-circumscribed, soft, tan masses with areas of hemorrhage and necrosis.
Microscopically, the tumor cells are poorly differentiated, grow in a syncytial pattern, and have an
intense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate.222 These cancers occur more frequently in younger patients and
are more frequent in women with BRCA1 mutations, although the majority of breast cancers in patients
with BRCA1 mutation are not medullary.223 Despite their aggressive histologic appearance, medullary
carcinomas are associated with a more favorable prognosis than IDC.224,225
Other breast cancer subtypes include macropapillary carcinomas that are highly aggressive and have a
tendency for lymph node metastasis even when small in size.226 Also likely associated with a worse
prognosis, metaplastic carcinomas are well-circumscribed tumors that contain various combinations of
poorly differentiated ductal adenocarcinoma, mesenchymal (sarcomatous), and other epithelial (e.g.,
squamous cell) components.227 When the squamous cell component predominates, the tumors tend to be
more aggressive and are frequently refractory to treatment when compared with IDC.228,229 Unlike IDC,
metaplastic breast cancers tend to have fewer T1 tumors, more node-negative tumors, more poorly
differentiated or undifferentiated tumors, and have fewer ER-positive tumors.227 Metaplastic breast
cancers are treated similarly to other invasive breast cancers.230–232
The grade of a breast cancer is determined by a combination of the architectural and cytologic
features, usually assessed by utilizing the Ellston–Ellis modification of the Scarff–Bloom-Richardson
scoring system. This system is based on three parameters including tubule formation, nuclear
pleomorphism, and mitotic activity. Each category is assigned a score of 1 to 3 and then a summation
score of 3 to 9. The lowest possible score is 3 with scores of 3 to 5 defined as grade 1, 6 or 7 as grade 2,
and 8 or 9 as grade 3. Cells that infiltrate the stroma as solid nests of glands and where the nuclei are
relatively uniform with little or no evidence of mitotic activity are referred to as well differentiated or
grade 1 tumors. When the tumor cells infiltrate as solid nests with some glandular differentiation and
nuclear pleomorphism is present, the tumor is categorized as grade 2 or moderately differentiated. In
addition, the mitotic activity is moderate. In poorly differentiated or grade 3 tumors, solid nests of
neoplastic cells without evidence of gland formation are present. In addition, there is marked nuclear
atypia and high mitotic activity.233
Biomarker Profile (ER, PR, HER2)
As targeted therapies exist against the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human
epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), these biomarkers have significant treatment implications.
As such, when an invasive breast cancer is diagnosed, expression of these biomarkers is determined.
Using immunohistochemistry and image analysis, ER and PR are considered positive if 10% of cells or
greater stain positive. The Allred score is another method to quantify ER and PR expression. The Allred
score integrates the percentage of cells that stain positive with the intensity of staining to give a score
of 0–8.234 The goal of the Allred score is to quantify ER expression on the basis of the likelihood that a
patient with breast cancer will respond to endocrine therapy. One of the benefits of the Allred score is
that by integrating both the percentage and intensity of staining, patients with <10% staining may be
identified who benefit from endocrine therapy.235 The receptor tyrosine kinase protein HER2 is a
member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family and its amplification or overexpression has
been shown to contribute to breast cancer development and progression. HER2 can now be targeted
using monoclonal antibodies and small molecule inhibitors. Using immunohistochemistry and image
analysis, HER2 is scored 0, 1+, 2+, and 3+. Positivity is noted as 3+, whereas scores of 0 and 1+ are
considered negative. A score of 2+ is considered indeterminate and further testing for gene
amplification can be performed using either FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) or CISH
(chromogenic in situ hybridization). The HER2 FISH assay is based on the gene copy number and the
ratio between the number of HER2 and chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) sequences, with
2067
positivity defined as a HER2/CEP17 ratio of ≥2.0. Positivity is also defined as HER2 copy number
≥6.0 signals/cell even if the HER2/CEP17 ratio is <2.0.236 Alternatively, a more cost-effective and
comparable method to FISH testing is the HER2 CISH assay.237,238
An emerging biomarker is the Ki-67 index. The Ki-67 antigen is present in all phases of the cell cycle
except for the G0/resting phase and reflects of the proliferative potential of a breast cancer. Ki-67 is
determined by IHC and noted as a percentage, where <10% is considered a low proliferative index,
10% to 20% is considered borderline, and >20% is considered high. The Ki-67 index can also be used to
measure the response to endocrine therapy.
Molecular Subtyping
Recent advances in molecular biology, including the development of sophisticated techniques for gene
expression profiling, have established a new taxonomy of breast cancer, defining molecular subtypes of
breast cancer. This new taxonomy has had a profound impact on the clinical management of breast
cancer, as the molecular subtypes differ markedly in prognosis and response to therapy. As gene
expression profiling is not routinely performed on clinical specimens, molecular subtypes have been
approximated on the basis of expression of the ER, PR, HER2 expression, and other biomarkers.
Commonly defined subtypes include luminal A (ER+, PR+, HER2−, Ki-67 <14%), luminal B (ER+
and or PR+, HER2+/−, Ki-67 ≥14%), HER2 (ER and PR−, HER2+), and basal-like (ER, PR, and
HER−).239–241 Luminal A and B subtypes have ER expression; however, the former group has a much
better overall survival.242 Luminal B HER2+ and HER2 subtypes benefit from targeted therapies
against HER2. Furthermore, both HER2 and basal-like breast cancers are known to have higher initial
responses to anthracycline-based chemotherapy than the luminal subtypes but are associated with a
decreased disease-free survival.243
Breast MRI
Although there are no data from prospective randomized trials demonstrating improved outcomes with
the addition of MRI to the diagnostic evaluation of newly diagnosed breast cancers, the NCCN
guidelines suggest that diagnostic MRI should be considered in patients with newly diagnosed breast
cancer (1) when the clinical extent of disease appears larger than what is observed on mammography,
(2) when there is concern about pectoralis muscle involvement, (3) when there is no evidence of a
breast primary in the presence of axillary lymph node metastases, (4) when there is no disease
identified on physical examination or mammography in the presence of PDB, (5) in women at very high
risk for contralateral breast cancers such as those with BRCA1/2 mutations, and (6) to help determine
the extent of disease prior to treatment. Of note, MRI is associated with a high false-positive rate, and
many MRI-detected abnormalities will need to be biopsied in order to meaningfully interpret the results
of the MRI.
Table 74-11 Approach To the Axillary Nodes
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Breast cancer spread to ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes is common, occurring in 15% to 30% of
patients. The presence of axillary lymph node metastases has important prognostic implications and can
impact medical, surgical, and radiation oncology decision-making. However, axillary lymph node
dissection (ALND) has significant risks, and the therapeutic impact of axillary surgery remains to be
clearly defined.244–246 Currently, SLNB is the procedure of choice for staging of the axilla in breast
2068
cancer. Axillary ultrasound has also been used and can facilitate evaluation of patients with an equivocal
physical examination (Table 74-11).
6 The SLN hypothesis predicts that breast cancers metastasize to one or a few lymph nodes before
involving other lymph nodes in the corresponding lymph node basin. Prospective studies have
confirmed this hypothesis, demonstrating that the pathology of the SLN accurately predicts the
pathology of the corresponding axillary lymph node basin (Table 74-12). SLNB has significantly fewer
complications than ALND, with the risk of lymphedema being significantly lower (2% after SLNB versus
13% after ALND at 12 months).247
The SLNB procedure begins with localization of the SLN through injection of radioactive colloid
and/or blue dye. Given that the combined use of both tracers appears to be complementary and that
failed SLN identification is minimized when both tracers are used, this is our recommended approach. A
systematic review by an expert panel convened by ASCO concluded that the use of both blue dye and
radioactive colloid was associated with a trend toward a lower false-negative rate.248
Prior to surgery, radioactive technetium sulfur colloid is injected peritumorally, intradermally, or into
the subareolar plexus. Lymphoscintigraphy can be performed to identify areas of increased
radioactivity. Alternatively, a handheld gamma probe can be used to survey the axilla and identify hot
spots. The patient is then brought to the operating room and positioned with the ipsilateral arm
abducted up to 90 degrees. The breast, anterior chest wall, and axilla are prepped and draped in the
usual standard sterile fashion. Five milliliters of blue dye (isosulfan or methylene blue dye) is injected
around the tumor periphery, at the palpable edge of the biopsy cavity, or into the subareolar plexus.
Blue dye should not be injected directly into the tumor itself as the lymphatics may be occluded by
tumor. Likewise, blue dye should not be injected into the seroma cavity following breast surgery as the
seroma cavity may not have sufficient lymphatic drainage. For these reasons, we typically inject into
the subareolar plexus. Breast massage is performed for 5 minutes to dilate the breast lymphatics and
facilitate lymphatic drainage.
Isosulfan blue can be used for SLNB; however, anaphylaxis requiring resuscitation can occur in 0.7%
to 1.1% of cases.249,250 Alternatively, methylene blue can be used. The risks associated with methylene
blue include skin necrosis if injected intradermally, pain secondary to caustic reaction, and pulmonary
edema.251–253 These risks can be minimized by diluting the methylene blue, with common dilutions
ranging from 2:3 (2 mL of methylene blue mixed with 3 mL of saline, injecting 5 mL total) to 1:4 (1 mL
of methylene blue mixed with 4 mL of saline, injecting 5 mL total). In patients taking serotonergic
psychiatric mediations, methylene blue should be used with caution as the dye can prevent the action of
monoamine oxidase A, resulting in toxic levels of serotonin or serotonin syndrome. This is characterized
by mental status changes, muscle twitching, excessive sweating, shivering, diarrhea, trouble with
coordination, and/or fever.254
Using a handheld gamma probe, the axilla is systematically surveyed and the skin is marked at the
location of the hottest spot. A small incision is then made below the hair-bearing area of the axilla and
carried down through the subcutaneous tissue. The clavipectoral fascia is incised with care to visually
identify any blue lymphatics. The blue lymphatics are then followed toward the axilla to identify the
sentinel lymph node(s). Successful SLN identification by blue dye is defined as the identification of any
blue node or non–blue node with a blue afferent lymphatic. These lymph nodes are also evaluated with
the gamma probe and the associated counts are recorded. The dissection is continued until all lymph
nodes associated with a blue afferent lymphatic are removed and any remaining lymph nodes have less
than 10% radioactivity compared to the most radioactive lymph node.259–261 This often results in more
than one SLN being identified and removed. Finally, palpation of the axilla is performed and any
suspicious lymph nodes are also removed as gross tumor involvement can interfere with uptake of both
radioactive colloid and blue dye. In the case of gross tumor involvement, the radioactive colloid and
blue dye may be diverted to a lymph node other than the true SLN, giving rise to a false-negative result
if palpation of the axilla and removal of suspicious lymph nodes is not performed.262,263 Once all SLNs
have been identified and removed, the clavipectoral fascia is reapproximated and the skin is closed in
two layers.
RESULTS
Table 74-12 Results of Prospective, Multi-Institutional Studies of Lymphatic
Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy
2069
TREATMENT OF THE PATIENT WITH BREAST CANCER
Breast cancer is currently treated with a multidisciplinary approach. Most patients benefit from a
combination of therapies that may include surgery, medical therapy, and radiation therapy. This
multidisciplinary approach has resulted in a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality.264 One
important consideration is optimal coordination of surgery with the other treatment modalities. In the
discussion below we will first provide an overview of how the different treatment modalities are
coordinated in early stage, locally advanced, and metastatic breast cancer. After this overview, surgery,
medical therapy, and radiation therapy will be discussed in more detail.
Overview
7 Most patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer have no evidence of metastatic disease and are
diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. This includes patients with clinical stage I (T1N0), IIA (T1N1 or
T2N0), or IIB (T2N1) disease. Local regional management often consists of BCT (partial mastectomy
with radiation therapy) or mastectomy, noting that the choice in locoregional management does not
typically impact the recommendation for adjuvant medical therapy. For patients with clinical T1N0
disease, surgery is typically the first treatment modality. For patients with clinical T2N0 or T2N1
disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy is often the first treatment modality. The goal
of neoadjuvant therapy is to shrink the primary breast cancer prior to surgery, facilitating BCT. For
patients with a clinically suspicious axilla, an ultrasound-guided FNA may be helpful to determine
whether there is metastatic spread to the axilla. If the FNA is negative, then the patient should undergo
a SLNB at the time of surgery. For patients with a clinically negative axilla, a SLNB should be planned at
the time of surgery with a decision about further management of the axilla, if any, pending the results
of the SLNB. The decision to recommend chemotherapy for patients with early breast cancer is primarily
dependent on tumor characteristics but also integrates the patient’s overall health status and personal
preference. Adjuvant chemotherapy is typically recommended when high-risk features are present such
as high-grade tumor, large tumor size (≥1.0 cm), unfavorable biomarker profile, or lymph node
involvement. In addition, an Oncotype DX can be obtained in patients with ER+/HER2-negative breast
cancers and negative lymph nodes. A score of ≥31 often suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy will be
beneficial. For patients with breast cancers that are hormone receptor-positive, endocrine therapy is
typically recommended postoperatively. If adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended, then endocrine
therapy is given after completion of chemotherapy. For patients with TNBC, adjuvant chemotherapy is
commonly given if the tumor size is ≥0.5 cm. Patients who have HER2-positive breast cancers that are
≥1.0 cm are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy plus HER2-directed therapy. The management of
HER2-positive breast cancers that are <1.0 cm is controversial and should be decided by the patient
and her provider after a discussion of the risks and benefits of treatment. Adjuvant radiation therapy is
typically recommended for all patients who are treated with BCT and a subset of patients who are
treated with mastectomy (see the section on Radiation Therapy).
Patients with locally advanced disease (clinical stage IIB (T3N0) or stage IIIA-IIIC (T1-T3N2 disease, T4
disease)) are at a higher risk for recurrence and distant metastases, and neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant
chemotherapy and radiation therapy are typically recommended (Fig. 74-21). Benefits of neoadjuvant
chemotherapy in this clinical context include the ability to treat any potential systemic disease
immediately and the ability to directly assess the response to treatment by physical examination and
imaging, allowing for suboptimal regimens to be discontinued and other regimens to be prescribed. In
patients with hormone receptor-positive disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a higher
response rate in a shorter period of time than endocrine therapy. Endocrine therapy in the neoadjuvant
setting is often reserved for postmenopausal women who have contraindications to chemotherapy. For
2070
patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, HER2-directed therapy such as trastuzumab is often given
with pertuzumab along with chemotherapy. If a patient has a limited response or cannot tolerate the
neoadjuvant regimen, she should proceed with surgery. Even if patients have an excellent clinical
response, they should undergo surgery to remove the area of involvement. Although BCT is an option
for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) who have a significant clinical response to
neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy is typically recommended for those who initially present with
breast cancers that are greater than 5 cm.
Approximately 5% of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer will present with stage IV disease,
and up to 30% of patients who present with early stage breast cancer at diagnosis will develop distant
metastatic disease.265 The approach to patients with metastatic breast cancer is focused on prolonging
survival and improving quality of life by minimizing cancer- related symptoms. As such, the treatment
plans for these patients are highly individualized.
Figure 74-21. Locally advanced breast cancer. The breast is lifted and the upper half is bulging because of the large tumor.
Distortion in the inferolateral contour is evident. The medial skin changes are caused by dermal tumor satellites.
TREATMENT
Table 74-13 Recommendations for Adjuvant Therapy
For patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2- negative disease, the preference is for endocrine
therapy alone. However, for patients with rapidly progressing disease, endocrine-resistant disease, or a
large tumor burden involving visceral organs, chemotherapy should be considered.266,267 For patients
with HER2+ disease, HER2-directed therapies should be administered along with chemotherapy. For
patients with TNBCs, chemotherapy is the only option for the treatment of metastatic disease.
When chemotherapy is indicated, the preference is for sequential single agent therapy, which includes
2071
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع