ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed cancer treatment over the last decade. Alongside this therapeutic improvement, a new variety of side effects has emerged, called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), potentially affecting any organ. Among these irAEs, myocarditis is rare but life-threatening.

METHODS: We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional retrospective study with the aim of better characterizing ICI-related myocarditis. Myocarditis diagnosis was based on the recent consensus statement of the International Cardio-Oncology Society.

RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were identified, from six different referral centers. Most patients (55%) were treated using anti-programmed-death 1, rather than ICI combination (35%) or anti-programmed-death-ligand 1 (10%). Transthoracic echocardiography was abnormal in 52% of them, and cardiac magnetic resonance showed abnormal features in 14/24 patients (58%). Eleven patients (38%) were classified as severe. Compared with other patients, they had more frequently pre-existing systemic autoimmune disease (45% vs 6%, p=0.018), higher troponin level on admission (42-fold the upper limit vs 3.55-fold, p=0.001), and exhibited anti-acetylcholine receptor autoantibodies (p=0.001). Seven patients (24%) had myocarditis-related death, and eight more patients died from cancer progression during follow-up. Twenty-eight patients received glucocorticoids, 10 underwent plasma exchanges, 8 received intravenous immunoglobulins, and 5 other immunosuppressants. ICI rechallenge was performed in six patients, with only one myocarditis relapse.

DISCUSSION: The management of ICI-related myocarditis may be challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Prognostic features are herein described and may help to allow ICI rechallenge for some patients with smoldering presentation, after an accurate evaluation of benefit-risk balance.

PMID:37258037 | DOI:10.1136/jitc-2022-004792

01:18

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

An ERK5-NRF2 Axis Mediates Senescence-Associated Stemness and Atherosclerosis

01:18

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

01:18

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Comparative arrhythmia patterns among patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 May 31. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01575-z. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely used in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Limited studies have shown an association between treatment-limiting arrhythmias and TKI, particularly ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. We sought to comprehensively assess the arrhythmia burden in patients receiving ibrutinib vs non-BTK TKI vs non-TKI therapies.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who received long-term cardiac event monitors while on ibrutinib, non-BTK TKIs, or non-TKI therapy for a hematologic malignancy between 2014 and 2022.

RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients with hematologic malignancies were included (ibrutinib = 72, non-BTK TKI = 46, non-TKI therapy = 75). The average duration of TKI therapy was 32 months in the ibrutinib group vs 64 months in the non-BTK TKI group (p = 0.003). The ibrutinib group had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (n = 32 [44%]) compared to the non-BTK TKI (n = 7 [15%], p = 0.001) and non-TKI (n = 15 [20%], p = 0.002) groups. Similarly, the prevalence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia was higher in the ibrutinib group (n = 31, 43%) than the non-BTK TKI (n = 8 [17%], p = 0.004) and non-TKI groups (n = 20 [27%], p = 0.04). TKI therapy was held in 25% (n = 18) of patients on ibrutinib vs 4% (n = 2) on non-BTK TKIs (p = 0.005) secondary to arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective analysis of patients with hematologic malignancies, patients receiving ibrutinib had a higher prevalence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias compared to those receiving other TKI, with a higher rate of treatment interruption due to arrhythmias.

PMID:37256462 | DOI:10.1007/s10840-023-01575-z

C

02:56

Cardiotoxicity News

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

02:56

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Correction to: Direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jun 3;31(6):373. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07851-y.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:37269357 | DOI:10.1007/s00520-023-07851-y

02:56

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

02:56

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

D-dimer testing: A narrative review

Adv Clin Chem. 2023;114:151-223. doi: 10.1016/bs.acc.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

ABSTRACT

D-dimer containing species are soluble fibrin degradation products derived from plasmin-mediated degradation of cross-linked fibrin, i.e., 'D-dimer'. D-dimer can hence be considered a biomarker of in vivo activation of both coagulation and fibrinolysis, the leading clinical application in daily practice of which is ruling out venous thromboembolism (VTE). D-dimer has been further evaluated for assessing the risk of VTE recurrence and helping define optimal duration of anticoagulation treatment in VTE, for diagnosing disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and for screening those at enhanced risk of VTE. D-dimer assays should however be performed as intended by regulatory agencies, as their use outside these indications might make them a laboratory-developed test (LDT). This narrative review is aimed at: (1) reviewing the definition of D-dimer, (2) discussing preanalytical variables affecting D-dimer measurement, (3) reviewing and comparing the assays performance and some postanalytical variables (e.g., different units and age-adjusted cutoffs), and (4) discussing the interest of D-dimer measurement across different clinical settings, including pregnancy, cancer, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

PMID:37268332 | DOI:10.1016/bs.acc.2023.02.006

02:56

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

02:56

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

02:56

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

02:56

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

02:56

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

02:56

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

02:56

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Recurrent VTE in Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA. 2023 Jun 2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7843. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: In patients with cancer who have venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, long-term anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended to prevent recurrent VTE. The effectiveness of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared with LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE in patients with cancer is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate DOACs, compared with LMWH, for preventing recurrent VTE and for rates of bleeding in patients with cancer following an initial VTE event.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Unblinded, comparative effectiveness, noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted at 67 oncology practices in the US that enrolled 671 patients with cancer (any invasive solid tumor, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) who had a new clinical or radiological diagnosis of VTE. Enrollment occurred from December 2016 to April 2020. Final follow-up was in November 2020.

INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a DOAC (n = 335) or LMWH (n = 336) and were followed up for 6 months or until death. Physicians and patients selected any DOAC or any LMWH (or fondaparinux) and physicians selected drug doses.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the recurrent VTE rate at 6 months. Noninferiority of anticoagulation with a DOAC vs LMWH was defined by the upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI for the difference of a DOAC relative to LMWH of less than 3% in the randomized cohort that received at least 1 dose of assigned treatment. The 6 prespecified secondary outcomes included major bleeding, which was assessed using a 2.5% noninferiority margin.

RESULTS: Between December 2016 and April 2020, 671 participants were randomized and 638 (95%) completed the trial (median age, 64 years; 353 women [55%]). Among those randomized to a DOAC, 330 received at least 1 dose. Among those randomized to LMWH, 308 received at least 1 dose. Rates of recurrent VTE were 6.1% in the DOAC group and 8.8% in the LMWH group (difference, -2.7%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 0.7%) consistent with the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Of 6 prespecified secondary outcomes, none were statistically significant. Major bleeding occurred in 5.2% of participants in the DOAC group and 5.6% in the LMWH group (difference, -0.4%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 2.5%) and did not meet the noninferiority criterion. Severe adverse events occurred in 33.8% of participants in the DOAC group and 35.1% in the LMWH group. The most common serious adverse events were anemia and death.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among adults with cancer and VTE, DOACs were noninferior to LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE over 6-month follow-up. These findings support use of a DOAC to prevent recurrent VTE in patients with cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02744092.

PMID:37266947 | DOI:10.1001/jama.2023.7843

02:56

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Cerebral infarction related to nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis in a middle-aged woman with uterine adenomyosis: A case report

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jun 2;102(22):e33871. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033871.