topics

10/30/25

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to compare the clinical burden and healthcare utilization outcomes of hematologic versus solid malignancies in patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). This population-based, retrospective study extracted and analyzed the discharge data from the 2016-2018 US National Inpatient Sample (NIS) of hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of acute PE and a subsequent diagnosis of hematologic malignancies or solid tumors. Prolonged length-of-stay (LOS) was defined as ≥75th percentile LOS of the study cohort. Unfavorable discharge was defined as discharged to nursing home or long-term facility. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between cancer type, presence of unstable PE, and in-hospital outcomes in acute PE patients. Patients with acute PE with solid tumors had higher rates of in-hospital deaths and unfavorable discharge than those with hematologic malignancies (6.4% versus 3.2%, P < 0.001; 14.0% versus 11.2%, P = 0.01, respectively). Acute PE patients with hematologic malignancies had a lower risk of in-hospital death (aOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.31-0.60), unfavorable discharge (aOR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.92), and prolonged LOS (aOR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71-0.98) than those with solid tumors. Stratified analysis showed that male patients aged <60

PMID:37258119 | DOI:10.1536/ihj.22-704

02:40

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

02:40

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

BMJ. 2023 Jun 1;381:e072715. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072715.

ABSTRACT

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of both morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Venous thromboembolism, which includes both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, affects a sizable portion of patients with malignancy and can have potentially life threatening complications. Accurate assessment of risk as well as diagnosis and treatment of this process is paramount to preventing death in this high risk population. Various risk models predictive of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer have been developed, and knowledge of these rubrics is essential for the treating oncologist. Subgroups of particular interest are inpatients receiving chemotherapy, postoperative patients after surgical debulking, and patients undergoing radiotherapy. Numerous newer drugs have become available for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer who are at high risk of developing the disease. These include the class of drugs called direct oral anticoagulants, (DOACs) which do not require the same monitoring that other modalities have previously required and are taken by mouth, preventing the discomfort associated with subcutaneous strategies. The appropriate risk stratification and intervention to prevent venous thromboembolism are vital to the treatment of patients with cancer.

PMID:37263632 | DOI:10.1136/bmj-2022-072715

02:40

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Accuracy of the Physicians' Intuitive Risk Estimation in the Diagnostic Management of Pulmonary Embolism: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

J Thromb Haemost. 2023 May 30:S1538-7836(23)00438-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.05.023. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients clinically suspected of pulmonary embolism (PE), physicians often rely on an intuitive estimation ('gestalt') of PE presence. Although shown to be predictive, gestalt is criticized for its assumed variation across physicians and lack of standardization.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of gestalt in diagnosing PE and gain insight into its possible variation.

METHODS: We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis including patients suspected of PE. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of gestalt for diagnosing PE, quantified as a risk ratio (RR) between gestalt and PE from a two-stage random-effect log-binomial meta-analysis regression as well as gestalts' sensitivity and specificity. Variability of these measures was explored across different healthcare settings, publication period, PE prevalence, patient subgroups (sex, heart failure, chronic lung disease, and items of the Wells score other than gestalt), and age.

RESULTS: We analysed 20,770 patients suspected of PE from 16 original studies. The prevalence of PE in patients with and without a positive gestalt was 28.8% versus 9.1%, respectively. The overall RR was 3.02 (95%CI 2.35, 3.87) and overall sensitivity and specificity were 74% (95%CI 68-79%) and 61% (95%CI 53-68%). Although variation was observed across individual studies (I2-90.63%), diagnostic accuracy was consistent across all subgroups and healthcare settings.

CONCLUSIONS: A positive gestalt was associated with a threefold increased risk of PE in suspected patients. Although variation was observed across studies, the RR of gestalt was similar across prespecified subgroups and healthcare settings, exemplifying its diagnostic value for all patients suspected of PE.

PMID:37263381 | DOI:10.1016/j.jtha.2023.05.023

02:40

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Current status and hotspots evolution in myeloproliferative neoplasm: a bibliometric analysis from 2001 to 2022

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 May;27(10):4510-4519. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202305_32457.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In the last 20 years, the field of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) has changed dramatically. This study aims to provide new ideas for the scientific research of MPN by systematically combing the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to carry out a bibliometric analysis of MPN papers to visualize the development process, research hotspots, and cutting-edge trends in clinical practice, mechanisms, and management strategies related to MPN.

RESULTS: 1,099 authors from 736 institutions in 113 countries/regions published 11,922 papers in 1,807 academic journals. The United States and Italy were in the leading positions in this research field. Mayo Clinic is the institution with the largest number of publications. Only a few countries and institutions have shown active cooperation. Ayalew Tefferi and Ruben A. Mesa are outstanding contributors to the field. Blood and Leukemia are considered influential journals based on publications and citations. In this field, the research of MPN mainly focuses on the occurrence and progress mechanism of MPN, the clinical significance of non-driving gene mutation, optimization of primary and secondary thromboprophylaxis, clinical research of long-acting interferon and JAK2 inhibitors, and exploration of better therapies for myelofibrosis (primary and secondary) and post-MPN acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

CONCLUSIONS: The research is in a stage of rapid development. The collaboration between different institutions or countries (regions) still has room to grow. The hotspot analysis shows that the research of MPN mainly focuses on gene mutation, thrombosis, new drug applications, disease progression, etc.

PMID:37259732 | DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202305_32457

02:40

Photo

Not included, change data exporting settings to download.

1200×1200, 39.0 KB

02:40

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolic Disease in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor

Thromb Haemost. 2023 May 31. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769609. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of cancers. The risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) of this new therapeutic class are still to be specified.

METHODS: The included patients had to have cancer and should be treated with ICI. Data analyzed included demographic data, biological data, and immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). We studied the prevalence of VTEs and the factors associated with VTEs.

RESULTS: Of 374 patients on ICI, over a median follow-up period of 15.2 months, the number of VTE was 50 (13.4%). The majority of patients were treated for metastatic melanoma or nonsmall cell lung cancer. There was no difference in prevalence or survival between cancer types. Patients with combined therapy composed of nivolumab and ipilimumab had higher 1-year cumulative VTE occurrence (29.3% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7; 44.6]) than patients with pembrolizumab (14.9%, [95%CI: 2.5; 25.8], p= 0.03) or nivolumab (9.1%, [95% CI: 5.0; 12.9], p< 0.01). The presence of IRAE was associated with a higher risk of VTE occurrence compared with patients without any IRAE (1-year VTE cumulative incidence: 17.42% [95% CI: 9.5; 24.65] vs. 9.46% [95% CI: 5.18; 13.55], p= 0.04). There was a higher risk of VTE in patients treated with the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 3.71 [95% CI: 1.74; 7.90], p< 0.001) and in patients with IRAE (adjusted SHR: 2.14 [95% CI: 1.22; 3.75], p< 0.01).

CONCLUSION: The prevalence of VTE was 14.2% under ICIs. IRAE and combine treatment of nivolumab and ipilimumab were associated with VTE. The pathophysiological mechanisms are multiple and complex with a possible link to aberrant activation of the immune system.

PMID:37257835 | DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1769609