ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 2021 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis' (ISTH) recommends standard doses of apixaban and rivaroxaban regardless of high body mass index (BMI) and weight, but had not compare DOACs head-to-head in obesity or address underweight patients.

METHODS: Our aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs in underweight and obese patients compared to warfarin. The primary endpoints include incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events. Descriptive statistics was used for continuous variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the four-groups for continuous measures and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to analyze categorical data. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, was used for categorical variables, and the Mann-Whitney test (the non-parametric counterpart to the two-sample t-test) for continuous data.

RESULTS: Of 2940 patients receiving anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment or atrial fibrillation (AF), 492 met eligibility criteria. Within each group, 248 patients received warfarin, 101 received apixaban, 100 received rivaroxaban and 43 received dabigatran. Patients were characterized in 4 body mass index (BMI) categories, in which 80 were underweight and 412 were obese.

CONCLUSIONS: When each DOAC was compared to warfarin in rates of VTE, apixaban showed statistically significant lower rate of VTE (p = 0.0149). However, no statistical significance was identified in the rate of VTE between DOACs combined vs. warfarin (p = 0.1529). When each DOAC was compared to warfarin, apixaban showed the lowest rate of overall bleeding (p = 0.0194). However, no statistical difference in the rate of bleeding was observed between DOACs combined vs. warfarin (p = 0.3284). Patients with extreme body weights requiring anticoagulation for VTE and AF may safety benefit from DOAC therapy. This evaluation showed apixaban with the lowest rate of VTE and bleeding compared to warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. These results provide experience for the clinician to use DOACs, particularly apixaban, in underweight and obese populations.

PMID:37738772 | DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.09.001

12:33

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Evaluation of Expression Level of miR-3135b-5p in Blood Samples of Breast Cancer Patients Experiencing Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity

Indian J Clin Biochem. 2023 Oct;38(4):536-540. doi: 10.1007/s12291-022-01075-3. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of chemotherapeutics in the treatment of breast cancer is limited by cardiotoxicity, which could lead to irreversible heart failure. The evaluation of miRNA levels as a vital biomarker could predict cardiotoxicity induced by chemotherapy. According to our previous meta-analysis study on patients with heart failure, we found that miR-3135b had a significant increase in patients with heart failure. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the expression level of miR-3135b in the blood sample of patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Blood samples were collected from breast cancer patients or breast cancer patients who had received chemotherapy and had not experienced any chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity (N = 37, control group) and breast cancer patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity after chemotherapy (N = 33). The expression level of miR-3135b was evaluated using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The 2-ΔCt values of miR-3135b were compared between two groups. We observed a significant increase in the expression level of miR-3135b between patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and the control group (P = 0.0001). Besides, the ejection fraction parameter was correlated with the expression level of miR-3135b (r = 0.5 and P = 0.0001). To sum up, miR-3135b might be useful as a promising circulating biomarker in predicting cardiotoxicity induced by chemotherapy. However, more studies are needed to validate miR-3135b as a biomarker for the diagnosis of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12291-022-01075-3.

PMID:37746544 | PMC:PMC10516830 | DOI:10.1007/s12291-022-01075-3

12:33

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I-Guided Combination Angiotensin Receptor Blockade and Beta-Blocker Therapy to Prevent Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity: The Cardiac CARE Trial

Circulation. 2023 Sep 25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064274. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity has a variable incidence, and the development of left ventricular dysfunction is preceded by elevations in cardiac troponin concentrations. Beta-adrenergic receptor blocker and renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapies have been associated with modest cardioprotective effects in unselected patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy.

METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point trial, patients with breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving anthracycline chemotherapy underwent serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before and 6 months after anthracycline treatment. Patients at high risk of cardiotoxicity (cardiac troponin I concentrations in the upper tertile during chemotherapy) were randomized to standard care plus cardioprotection (combination carvedilol and candesartan therapy) or standard care alone. The primary outcome was adjusted change in left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months. In low-risk nonrandomized patients with cardiac troponin I concentrations in the lower 2 tertiles, we hypothesized the absence of a 6-month change in left ventricular ejection fraction and tested for equivalence of ±2%.

RESULTS: Between October 2017 and June 2021, 175 patients (mean age, 53 years; 87% female; 71% with breast cancer) were recruited. Patients randomized to cardioprotection (n=29) or standard care (n=28) had left ventricular ejection fractions of 69.4±7.4% and 69.1±6.1% at baseline and 65.7±6.6% and 64.9±5.9% 6 months after completion of chemotherapy, respectively. After adjustment for age, pretreatment left ventricular ejection fraction, and planned anthracycline dose, the estimated mean difference in 6-month left ventricular ejection fraction between the cardioprotection and standard care groups was -0.37% (95% CI, -3.59% to 2.85%; P=0.82). In low-risk nonrandomized patients, baseline and 6-month left ventricular ejection fractions were 69.3±5.7% and 66.4±6.3%, respectively: estimated mean difference, 2.87% (95% CI, 1.63%-4.10%; P=0.92, not equivalent).

CONCLUSIONS: Combination candesartan and carvedilol therapy had no demonstrable cardioprotective effect in patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy with high-risk on-treatment cardiac troponin I concentrations. Low-risk nonrandomized patients had similar declines in left ventricular ejection fraction, bringing into question the utility of routine cardiac troponin monitoring. Furthermore, the modest declines in left ventricular ejection fraction suggest that the value and clinical impact of early cardioprotection therapy need to be better defined in patients receiving high-dose anthracycline.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN24439460; Unique identifier, ISRCTN24439460. URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2017-000896-99; Unique identifier: EudraCT 2017-000896-99.

PMID:37746692 | DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064274

12:33

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

In-Hospital Venous Thromboembolism and Pulmonary Embolism After Major Urologic Cancer Surgery

Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep 18. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14246-0. Online ahead of print.