ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aponermin, a circularly permuted tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, is a potential death receptor 4/5-targeted antitumour candidate. Previous phase 1/2 studies have demonstrated the efficacy of aponermin in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). To confirm the superiority of aponermin plus thalidomide and dexamethasone (aponermin group) over placebo plus thalidomide and dexamethasone (placebo group) in RRMM, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled phase 3 trial was performed.

METHODS: Four hundred seventeen patients with RRMM who had previously received at least two regimens were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive aponermin, thalidomide, and dexamethasone or placebo, thalidomide, and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS: A total of 415 patients received at least one dose of trial treatment (276 vs. 139). The median PFS was 5.5 months in the aponermin group and 3.1 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.78; P < 0.001). The median OS was 22.4 months for the aponermin group and 16.4 months for the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; P = 0.003). Significantly higher rates of ORR (30.4% vs. 13.7%, P < 0.001) and very good partial response or better (14.1% vs. 2.2%, P < 0.0001) were achieved in the aponermin group than in the placebo group. Treatment with aponermin caused hepatotoxicity in some patients, as indicated by the elevated alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, or lactate dehydrogenase levels (52.2% vs. 24.5%, 51.1% vs. 19.4% and 44.9% vs. 21.6%, respectively), mostly grade 1/2, transient and reversible. The main grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia, pneumonia and hyperglycemia. The incidence of serious adverse events was similar between the two groups (40.6% vs. 37.4%). There was no evidence that aponermin leads to hematological toxicity, nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, or secondary tumors.

CONCLUSIONS: Aponermin plus thalidomide and dexamethasone significantly improved PFS, OS and ORR with manageable side effects in RRMM patients who had received at least two prior therapies. These results support the use of aponermin, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as a treatment option for RRMM patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn as ChiCTR-IPR-15006024, 17/11/2014.

PMID:37838670 | PMC:PMC10576321 | DOI:10.1186/s12885-023-11489-8

08:17

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation for Cancer Survivors With High Cardiovascular Risk: A Randomized Clinical Trial

08:17

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

MRI-derived extracellular volume as a biomarker of cancer therapy cardiotoxicity: systematic review and meta-analysis

Eur Radiol. 2023 Oct 12. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10260-8. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: MRI-derived extracellular volume (ECV) allows characterization of myocardial changes before the onset of overt pathology, which may be caused by cancer therapy cardiotoxicity. Our purpose was to review studies exploring the role of MRI-derived ECV as an early cardiotoxicity biomarker to guide timely intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In April 2022, we performed a systematic search on EMBASE and PubMed for articles on MRI-derived ECV as a biomarker of cancer therapy cardiotoxicity. Two blinded researchers screened the retrieved articles, including those reporting ECV values at least 3 months from cardiotoxic treatment. Data extraction was performed for each article, including clinical and technical data, and ECV values. Pooled ECV was calculated using the random effects model and compared among different treatment regimens and among those who did or did not experience overt cardiac dysfunction. Meta-regression analyses were conducted to appraise which clinical or technical variables yielded a significant impact on ECV.

RESULTS: Overall, 19 studies were included. Study populations ranged from 9 to 236 patients, for a total of 1123 individuals, with an average age ranging from 12.5 to 74 years. Most studies included patients with breast or esophageal cancer, treated with anthracyclines and chest radiotherapy. Pooled ECV was 28.44% (95% confidence interval, CI, 26.85-30.03%) among subjects who had undergone cardiotoxic cancer therapy, versus 25.23% (95%CI 23.31-27.14%) among those who had not (p = .003).

CONCLUSION: A higher ECV in patients who underwent cardiotoxic treatment could imply subclinical changes in the myocardium, present even before overt cardiac pathology is detectable.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The ability to detect subclinical changes in the myocardium displayed by ECV suggests its use as an early biomarker of cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity.

KEY POINTS: • Cardiotoxicity is a common adverse effect of cancer therapy; therefore, its prompt detection could improve patient outcomes. • Pooled MRI-derived myocardial extracellular volume was higher in patients who underwent cardiotoxic cancer therapy than in those who did not (28.44% versus 25.23%, p = .003). • MRI-derived myocardial extracellular volume represents a potential early biomarker of cancer therapy cardiotoxicity.

PMID:37823922 | DOI:10.1007/s00330-023-10260-8

08:17

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Advances in Screening for Radiation-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Oct 5. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01971-x. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Radiation is foundational to the treatment of cancer and improves overall survival. Yet, it is important to recognize the potential cardiovascular effects of radiation therapy and how to best minimize or manage them. Screening-both through imaging and with biomarkers-can potentially identify cardiovascular effects early, allowing for prompt initiation of treatment to mitigate late effects.

RECENT FINDINGS: Cardiac echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography, and measurements of troponin and natriuretic peptides serve as the initial screening tests of choice for RICD. Novel imaging applications, including positron emission tomography and specific MRI parameters, and biomarker testing, including myeloperoxidase, growth differentiation factor 15, galectin 3, micro-RNA, and metabolomics, hold promise for earlier detection and more specific characterization of RICD. Advances in imaging and novel applications of biomarkers have potential to identify subclinical RICD and may reveal opportunities for early intervention. Further research is needed to elucidate optimal imaging screening modalities, biomarkers, and surveillance strategies.

PMID:37796395 | DOI:10.1007/s11886-023-01971-x

08:20

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

In vivo evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interactions between almonertinib and rivaroxaban, almonertinib and apixaban

Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 4;14:1263975. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1263975. eCollection 2023.

ABSTRACT

Background: Almonertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), is commonly used as a first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR T790M mutations. Rivaroxaban and apixaban are a selective, direct factor Xa inhibitor used to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is a frequent complication of NSCLC. Rivaroxaban and apixaban are substrates of CYP3A4, P-gp and BCRP, whereas almonertinib is an inhibitor of P-gp and BCRP. Rivaroxaban or apixaban are often prescribed together with almonertinib in NSCLC patients, but clear information on pharmacokinetic drug interaction is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to unravel the extent of interactions between almonertinib-rivaroxaban and almonertinib apixaban in rats, and whether the pharmacokinetic interaction can be mitigated by rivaroxaban and apixaban dose adjustment. Methods: Rats were divided into ten groups (n = 6) that received rivaroxaban (2 mg/kg) (group 1), apixaban (0.5 mg/kg) (group 2), almonertinib (15 mg/kg) (group 3, group 4), almonertinib with rivaroxaban (2 mg/kg) (group 5), almonertinib with rivaroxaban (1 mg/kg) (group 6), almonertinib with apixaban (0.5 mg/kg) (group 7), almonertinib with apixaban (0.25 mg/kg) (group 8), rivaroxaban (2 mg/kg) with almonertinib (group 9), apixaban (0.5 mg/kg) with almonertinib (group 10). The concentrations of drugs were determined by an ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The levels of messenger RNA were determined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Results and Discussion: The results indicate that almonertinib increased the Cmax and AUC0-t of 2 mg/kg rivaroxaban by 3.30 and 3.60-fold, 1 mg/kg rivaroxaban by 1.28 and 1.90-fold. Almonertinib increased the Cmax and AUC0-t of 0.5 mg/kg apixaban by 2.69 and 2.87-fold, 0.25 mg/kg apixaban by 2.19 and 2.06-fold. In addition, rivaroxaban also increased systemic exposure to almonertinib. The results of qRT-PCR showed that almonertinib reduced the expression of Cyp3a1 in liver and intestine, and Abcb1a, Abcg2 in intestine and kidney. The pharmacokinetic results suggest that it is important to take special care of the interactions of these drugs in clinical applications.

PMID:37860116 | PMC:PMC10582335 | DOI:10.3389/fphar.2023.1263975

08:20

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

The prevalence of relevant drug-drug interactions and associated clinical outcomes in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis on concurrent anticoagulation and anticancer or supportive care therapies

Thromb Res. 2023 Oct 11;231:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.10.004. Online ahead of print.