ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lifetime cumulative doses of conventional doxorubicin (>450 mg/m2) are associated with dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. In sarcoma and breast cancer, conventional doxorubicin is often utilized in the adjuvant setting, whereas pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is typically reserved for recurrent and metastatic disease. PLD is believed to be associated with reduced cardiotoxicity compared to conventional doxorubicin. Limited data exists evaluating the cardiotoxicity associated with PLD treatment after conventional doxorubicin, especially when doxorubicin lifetime doses approach the established cumulative total lifetime dose of 450-550 mg/m2. This study aims to further qualify the cardiac safety of PLD use in patients who have had prior exposure to conventional doxorubicin.

METHODS: This was a single-center, observational, retrospective cohort study conducted in patients ≥18 years with sarcoma or breast cancer who were exposed to conventional doxorubicin from an earlier line of treatment before PLD between January 2010 to May 2022. Patients were evaluated for the presence of cardiac toxicity at any point in their treatment course. Cardiac toxicity was defined as ≥ 10% decrease in left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) or a new diagnosis of heart failure within six months after PLD cessation. The time interval between the last conventional doxorubicin exposure and PLD initiation and the time interval between PLD initiation and LVEF monitoring were also analyzed.

RESULTS: 494 patients were screened, and 50 met inclusion criteria: eight with sarcoma and 42 with breast cancer. The median lifetime cumulative conventional doxorubicin dose in patients with sarcoma was 450 mg/m2 with a maximum dose of 825 mg/m2 and 240 mg/m2 with a maximum dose of 300 mg/m2 in breast cancer patients. The median lifetime cumulative PLD dose was 105 mg/m2 (range: 35-150 mg/m2) in the sarcoma group and 105 mg/m2 (range: 35-510 mg/m2) in the breast cancer group. A decrease of ≥ 10% in LVEF was not observed in the sarcoma group. Patients with breast cancer had available LVEF data on PLD, and three of these patients experienced ≥ 10% in LVEF drop, with one of these patients diagnosed with heart failure. The average cumulative dose of PLD administered in patients with > 10% decrease in LVEF was 177 mg/m2 and had an average of 3.5 cycles. Five sarcoma patients initiated PLD treatment within two years after conventional doxorubicin exposure, while most breast patients initiated PLD treatment at least 10 years following conventional doxorubicin exposure. The average time from PLD initiation to first and second available LVEF monitoring was one and five months in the sarcoma group and three and eight months in the breast cancer group, respectively.

CONCLUSION: PLD administration in patients with prior exposure to conventional doxorubicin appears to be safe, with limited cardiotoxicity in patients with sarcoma and breast cancer. Future research is needed to determine if and how often routine cardiac monitoring is needed for patients on PLD without existing cardiac risk.

PMID:37809186 | PMC:PMC10559758 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.44837

08:16

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Development and Validation of a Nomogram Model for the Risk of Cardiac Death in Patients Treated with Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2023 Dec;23(11-12):377-387. doi: 10.1007/s12012-023-09807-4. Epub 2023 Oct 7.

ABSTRACT

The primary cause of mortality in esophageal cancer survivors is cardiac death. Early identification of cardiac mortality risk during chemotherapy for esophageal cancer is crucial for improving the prognosis. We developed and validated a nomogram model to identify patients with high cardiac mortality risk after chemotherapy for esophageal cancer for early screening and clinical decision-making. We randomly allocated 37,994 patients with chemotherapy-treated esophageal cancer into two groups using a 7:3 split ratio: model training (n = 26,598) and validation (n = 11,396). 5- and 10-year survival rates were used as endpoints for model training and validation. Decision curve analysis and the consistency index (C-index) were used to evaluate the model's net clinical advantage. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and computing the area under the curve (AUC). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on the prognostic index was performed. Patient risk was stratified according to the death probability. Age, surgery, sex, and year were most closely related to cardiac death and used to plot the nomograms. The C-index for the training and validation datasets were 0.669 and 0.698, respectively, indicating the nomogram's net clinical advantage in predicting cardiac death risk at 5 and 10 years. The 5- and 10-year AUCs were 0.753 and 0.772 for the training dataset and 0.778 and 0.789 for the validation dataset, respectively. The accuracy of the model in predicting cardiac death risk was moderate. This nomogram can identify patients at risk of cardiac death after chemotherapy for esophageal cancer at an early stage.

PMID:37804372 | DOI:10.1007/s12012-023-09807-4

08:16

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

The Role of Nrf2 and Inflammation on the Dissimilar Cardiotoxicity of Doxorubicin in Two-Time Points: a Cardio-Oncology In Vivo Study Through Time

Inflammation. 2023 Oct 14. doi: 10.1007/s10753-023-01908-0. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Doxorubicin (DOX) is a topoisomerase II inhibitor used in cancer therapy. Despite its efficacy, DOX causes serious adverse effects, such as short- and long-term cardiotoxicity. This work aimed to assess the short- and long-term cardiotoxicity of DOX and the role of inflammation and antioxidant defenses on that cardiotoxicity in a mice model. Adult CD-1 male mice received a cumulative dose of 9.0 mg/kg of DOX (2 biweekly intraperitoneal injections (ip), for 3 weeks). One week (1W) or 5 months (5M) after the last DOX administration, the heart was collected. One week after DOX, a significant increase in p62, tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) 2, glutathione peroxidase 1, catalase, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) cardiac expression, and a trend towards an increase in interleukin (IL)-6, TNFR1, and B-cell lymphoma 2 associated X (Bax) expression was observed. Moreover, DOX induced a decrease on nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 (Nrf2) cardiac expression. In both 1W and 5M, DOX led to a high density of infiltrating M1 macrophages, but only the 1W-DOX group had a significantly higher number of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) p65 immunopositive cells. As late effects (5M), an increase in Nrf2, myeloperoxidase, IL-33, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) expression, and a trend towards increased catalase expression were observed. Moreover, B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and carbonylated proteins expression decreased, and a trend towards decreased p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression were seen. Our study demonstrated that DOX induces adverse outcome pathways related to inflammation and oxidative stress, although activating different time-dependent response mechanisms.

PMID:37833616 | DOI:10.1007/s10753-023-01908-0

08:16

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Radiation Exposure of Cardiac Conduction Nodes During Breast Proton Therapy

Int J Part Ther. 2023 Mar 9;10(1):59-64. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-22-00038.1. eCollection 2023 Summer.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The exposition of cardiac conduction system during breast radiation therapy has never been studied, despite the increasing use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, which exposes larger volume to low-dose bath. We evaluated conduction node exposure during breast irradiation with volumetric modulated arc therapy and estimated the potential dosimetric benefit with intensity-modulated proton therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Atrioventricular (AVN) and sinoatrial (SAN) nodes were retrospectively delineated according to published guidelines on the simulation computed tomography scans of 12 breast cancer patients having undergone conserving surgery and adjuvant locoregional volumetric modulated arc therapy. Intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment was replanned on the simulation computed tomography scans for all breast cancer patients. Mean and maximum doses delivered to the SAN and the AVN were retrieved and compared. Correlation coefficients were calculated between doses to the SAN or the AVN and the whole heart.

RESULTS: Average mean doses delivered to the SAN and AVN were 2.8 and 2.3 Gy, respectively, for left-sided irradiation and 9.6 and 3.6 Gy, respectively, for right-sided irradiation. Average maximum doses to the SAN and AVN were 3.5 Gy and 2.8 Gy, respectively, for left-sided irradiation and 13.1 and 4.6 Gy, respectively, for right-sided irradiation. Intensity-modulated proton therapy significantly reduced mean and maximum doses to the SAN and AVN. Correlations between doses to the SAN or AVN and whole heart were usually significant.

CONCLUSION: SAN and AVN can be substantially exposed during breast volumetric modulated arc therapy, especially for right-sided irradiation. Cardiotoxicity studies evaluating conduction node exposure might define dose constraints and criteria for additional cardiac-sparing techniques, such as respiratory techniques or proton therapy, which could benefit patients with underlying rhythmic or conduction disorders.

PMID:37823017 | PMC:PMC10563662 | DOI:10.14338/IJPT-22-00038.1

08:16

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Outcomes of patients with active cancers and pre-existing cardiovascular diseases infected with SARS-CoV-2

Cardiooncology. 2023 Oct 6;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40959-023-00187-w.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection on patient with concomitant active cancer and CVD.

METHODS: The researchers extracted and analyzed data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) database between January 1, 2020, and July 22, 2022. They included only patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, defined as a positive test by PCR 21 days before and 5 days after the day of index hospitalization. Active cancers were defined as last cancer drug administered within 30 days of index admission. The "Cardioonc" group consisted of patients with CVD and active cancers. The cohort was divided into four groups: (1) CVD (-), (2) CVD ( +), (3) Cardioonc (-), and (4) Cardioonc ( +), where (-) or ( +) denotes acute SARS-CoV-2 infection status. The primary outcome of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including acute stroke, acute heart failure, myocardial infarction, or all-cause mortality. The researchers analyzed the outcomes by different phases of the pandemic and performed competing-risk analysis for other MACE components and death as a competing event.

RESULTS: The study analyzed 418,306 patients, of which 74%, 10%, 15.7%, and 0.3% had CVD (-), CVD ( +), Cardioonc (-), and Cardioonc ( +), respectively. The Cardioonc ( +) group had the highest MACE events in all four phases of the pandemic. Compared to CVD (-), the Cardioonc ( +) group had an odds ratio of 1.66 for MACE. However, during the Omicron era, there was a statistically significant increased risk for MACE in the Cardioonc ( +) group compared to CVD (-). Competing risk analysis showed that all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the Cardioonc ( +) group and limited other MACE events from occurring. When the researchers identified specific cancer types, patients with colon cancer had higher MACE.

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the study found that patients with both CVD and active cancer suffered relatively worse outcomes when they had acute SARS-CoV-2 infection during early and alpha surges in the United States. These findings highlight the need for improved management strategies and further research to better understand the impact of the virus on vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PMID:37803479 | PMC:PMC10557272 | DOI:10.1186/s40959-023-00187-w

08:16

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Granulomatous peritoneal disease associated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for ampullary adenocarcinoma: a case report

Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2023 Jul-Sep;86(3):499-501. doi: 10.51821/86.3.11323.