ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in surgical inpatients with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and additional graduated compression stockings (GCS) versus pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical inpatients have elevated VTE risk; recent studies cast doubt whether GCS confer additional protection against VTE, compared to pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone.
METHODS: The review followed PRISMA guidelines using a registered protocol (CRD42017062655). The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched to November 2022. Randomised trials reporting VTE rate after surgical procedures, utilising pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, with or without GCS, were included. The rates of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), VTE-related mortality were pooled via fixed and random effects.
RESULTS: In head-to-head meta-analysis, the risk of DVT for GCS and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.85 (95% CI 0.54-1.36) versus for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone (2 studies, 70 events, 2653 participants). The risk of DVT in pooled trial arms for GCS and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.54 (95% CI 0.23-1.25) versus pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone (33 trial arms, 1228 events, 14,108 participants). The risk of PE for GCS and pharmacological prophylaxis versus pharmacological prophylaxis alone was 0.71 (95% CI 0.0-30.0) (27 trial arms, 32 events, 11,472 participants). There were no between-group differences in VTE-related mortality (27 trial arms, 3 events, 12,982 participants).
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from head-to-head meta-analysis and pooled trial arms demonstrates no additional benefit for GCS in preventing VTE and VTE-related mortality. GCS confer a risk of skin complications and an economic burden; current evidence does not support their use for surgical inpatients.
PMID:37753655 | DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006096
07:08
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Effect of factor XI inhibition on tumor cell-induced coagulation activation
J Thromb Haemost. 2023 Sep 24:S1538-7836(23)00717-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.09.015. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a frequent complication in patients with malignancies. While FXI/FXIa inhibition is efficacious in preventing postoperative venous thromboembolism, its role in tumor cell-induced coagulation is less defined.
OBJECTIVES: We thus aimed to provide mechanistic insights into FXI/FXIa inhibition in tumor cell-induced coagulation activation.
METHODS: Procoagulant activity (PCA) of four different tissue factor (TF) expressing tumor cell lines was analyzed by single-stage clotting and thrombin generation assay in the presence of a FXIa inhibitor, BMS-262084 (BMS), an inhibitory FXI antibody (anti-FXI), or peak and trough concentrations of rivaroxaban or tinzaparin. Further, tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation was recorded. Recombinant human TF (rhTF) served as positive control.
RESULTS: Although BMS and anti-FXI potently inhibited FXIa amidolytic activity, both inhibitors efficiently mitigated rhTF- and tumor cell-induced fibrin clot formation and platelet aggregation only in the presence of low TF PCA. The anticoagulant effects showed an inverse correlation with the magnitude of cellular TF PCA expression. Similarly, BMS markedly interfered with tumor cell-induced thrombin generation, with the most prominent effects on peak and total thrombin. In addition, anticoagulant effects of FXIa inhibition by 10 μM BMS were in a similar range to those obtained by 600 nM rivaroxaban and 1.6 μM tinzaparin at low TF PCA levels. However, rivaroxaban and tinzaparin also exerted marked anticoagulant activity at high TF PCA levels.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that FXI/FXIa inhibition interferes with tumor cell-induced coagulation activation only at low TF PCA expression levels, a finding with potential implications for future in-vivo studies.
PMID:37751848 | DOI:10.1016/j.jtha.2023.09.015
07:08
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis practices for patients with sickle cell disease prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2023 Sep 21. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000001250. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are predisposed to a hypercoagulable state due to alterations in the coagulation system. Despite concern for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this population, there are no standardized guidelines for routine thromboprophylaxis. The objective of this study was to assess thromboprophylaxis practices of adult and pediatric treaters of SCD before and during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to pediatric and adult hematology oncology practitioners through seven SCD-specific interest groups between May 29, 2020, and July 13, 2020. Of 93 total responses, 14% (N = 13) reported they only treat patients more than 21 years old; 38.7% (N = 36) only treat patients 0-21 years old and 47.3% (N = 44) reported they treat both. Our study showed that before the COVID-19 pandemic, 96% of adult practitioners would recommend pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, mechanical thromboprophylaxis or both for hospitalized adults with thromboprophylaxis, but only 76% of pediatric treaters would recommend any thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized children (P < 0.0001), with 24% of pediatric treaters choosing no thromboprophylaxis at all. During the COVID-19 pandemic, pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis specifically was recommended for adults by 94% of treaters and for pediatric patients by 76% of treaters. These findings suggest that despite the lack of evidence-based thromboprophylaxis guidelines in adults and children with thromboprophylaxis, subspecialty treaters routinely provide pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in their adult patients and will modify their practice in pediatric patients who are considered at a high risk for VTE.
PMID:37756203 | DOI:10.1097/MBC.0000000000001250
07:08
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Oral Anticoagulants Beyond Warfarin
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023 Sep 27. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-032823-122811. Online ahead of print.