before the aneurysm repair, the same course should likely be followed although this decision requires a
modicum of clinical judgment. The infectious concerns must be balanced by the fact that the small
bowel contents are sterile, a second procedure will be required to repair the aneurysm, and the small
risk of aneurysm rupture during the intervening delay. Injury to the bowel during or after implantation
of the aortic graft should be treated with repair of the defect, extensive irrigation, and prolonged
antibiotics. Admittedly, these approaches are very conservative and it is noteworthy that multiple
clinical series have attested to the safety of simultaneous aortic and gastrointestinal/urologic
procedures.202–205 The ureter is susceptible to injury at the point where it crosses over the iliac
bifurcation. Injury can be avoided by a heightened awareness of this anatomic location and dissection in
the tissue plane immediately on top of the common iliac vessels. Inadvertent venous injury can be
associated with significant bleeding. This can usually be controlled by direct pressure using sponge
sticks and suture repair. The left renal vein may be transected if necessary. It should be transected near
its juncture with the vena cava, and the gonadal, adrenal, and lumbar branches should be preserved to
maintain venous outflow from the kidney. Although somewhat inelegant, division of the left renal vein
does not appear to affect renal function after AAA repair.206 Transecting the common iliac artery or
infrarenal aorta may facilitate exposure of the common iliac or retroaortic renal veins, respectively.
Excessive intraoperative bleeding may be encountered occasionally. Routine elective aneurysm
repairs are usually associated with moderate intraoperative blood loss with a mean transfusion
requirement of 1 to 2 units of packed red blood cells. Excessive bleeding may be caused by either the
surgical trauma or coagulopathy. Reversal of the heparin with protamine may help correct the
coagulopathic bleeding. Patients with significant bleeding and platelet counts below 50,000/mL should
receive a platelet transfusion, and it should be considered for coagulopathic bleeding and counts below
100,000/mL or for those on preoperative clopidogrel or other equivalent anti-platelet medications.
Transfusions of fresh frozen plasma are indicated for both patients with either significant bleeding in
conjunction with prolonged coagulation studies (>1.5 times control value) and those with
coagulopathic bleeding. Massive bleeding, defined as more than 100% of the blood volume, may induce
a dilutional coagulopathy with prolongation of the coagulation studies. Additional blood products
should be set up in the blood bank in the event of significant bleeding. This may require an additional
blood bank specimen. Intraoperative autologous transfusion devices should also be considered if not
already in use.
Ischemia of the lower extremities has been reported to occur approximately 3% of the time after open
repair.201 The causes are multiple and include distal embolization, thrombosis, clamp injury, and
technical errors. The lumen of the aneurysm is frequently filled with both thrombus and atheromatous
debris that may serve as a source for both macro- and microembolization. The macroemboli usually
lodge at the bifurcations of the major vessels; the microemboli usually lodge in the digital vessels and,
unfortunately, are not amenable to mechanical extraction. Thrombosis may result from inadequate
heparinization, hypercoagulable conditions, or poor arterial runoff. The technical conduct of the
operation outlined above is designed to minimize the ischemic complications. The specific maneuvers
include anticoagulation, selection of a suitable site for distal clamp application and anastomosis,
intraluminal control of severely calcified vessels, flushing of the vessels before clamp removal, and
sequential removal of the vascular clamps. Further intervention is mandatory if the lower extremities
are found to be ischemic. Anastomotic defects should be corrected. This may simply require dissembling
and redoing the anastomosis, but often requires placing the anastomosis further distal on the outflow
artery. If no problems are identified at the distal anastomosis, the femoral vessels should be explored
and an intraluminal thrombus removed with a balloon embolectomy catheter. A transverse arteriotomy
may be created in the common femoral artery if it is anticipated that only a thrombectomy will be
required; a longitudinal incision should be created if a bypass (inflow or outflow) procedure is
anticipated. The transverse arteriotomy can simply be closed with interrupted sutures without
narrowing the lumen in the event that an additional bypass procedure is not necessary, whereas the
longitudinal arteriotomy requires a patch closure. A bypass from the aortic graft to the femoral vessels
is required if adequate inflow cannot be restored with thrombectomy alone. The popliteal artery below
the knee should be explored and a thrombectomy performed if the extremity is still ischemic. This may
be facilitated by creating a longitudinal arteriotomy on the below knee popliteal artery that extends to
the tibioperoneal trunk. This allows the passage of the balloon embolectomy catheter into all three
tibial vessels under direct vision. A below knee popliteal or tibial artery bypass is required if adequate
perfusion to the distal extremity is not restored after patch closure of the popliteal arteriotomy.
Predictably, a complex lower-extremity revascularization in conjunction with an aortic reconstruction is
2739
associated with a significant degree of morbidity and dramatically increases the mortality rate.207 The
decision to proceed with an infrainguinal bypass depends on the status of the extremity and requires
some clinical judgment. Aborting the procedure and allowing for a period of observation and rewarming is appropriate when popliteal Doppler signals are detected and the foot is cool yet not severely
ischemic. Reoperation and definitive treatment may be necessary in the early postoperative period
unless marked improvement is noted.
Many of the systemic complications that follow open aneurysm repair are not surprising, given the
magnitude of the operation and the age/comorbidities of the patients. Cardiac complications (ischemia,
infarction, arrhythmias, congestive heart failure) occur in up to 25%200,201,208 and are the leading cause
of death after open aneurysm repair in many series. Pulmonary complications (pneumonia, ventilator
dependence >48 hours, acute respiratory distress syndrome) are also quite common and approximately
10% of the patients require prolonged ventilation.200,201 Deterioration of renal function, defined by an
increase in serum creatinine or blood urea nitrogen, occurs in approximately 5% of cases although acute
renal failure requiring dialysis is rare (i.e., <1%).201 The potential causes of renal insufficiency in the
perioperative period are numerous and include contrast nephrotoxicity, hypovolemia,
atheroembolization, and the inflammatory response from the lower torso ischemia/reperfusion injury.
Postoperative bleeding requiring reexploration, intra-abdominal abscess, and abdominal wound
complications are all relatively infrequent complications and are associated with all major intraabdominal procedures.
Ischemic colitis has been reported to occur in approximately 2% to 13% of cases after open aneurysm
repair.209,210 The reported incidence depends on the diagnostic algorithm and modality (routine
sigmoidoscopy vs. selective sigmoidoscopy) and is dramatically increased after ruptured aneurysm
repair. Indeed, the incidence of colonic ischemia after ruptured aneurysm repair in patients undergoing
routine colonoscopy is approximately 25% to 40%.209,211 Multivariable analysis of patients undergoing
both open and endovascular repair demonstrated that the duration of the procedure and preoperative
renal insufficiency were also predictors of colon ischemia.210 The sigmoid colon is affected most
frequently although all the sections of the colon may be involved. The ischemia may result from
inadequate resuscitation, disruption of collaterals, and/or failure to revascularize a hemodynamically
significant inferior mesenteric artery. Patients usually present with bloody diarrhea in the early
postoperative period. However, the diagnosis should be considered in the absence of bloody diarrhea in
patients with thrombocytopenia, multiple-organ dysfunction, increasing abdominal pain/peritonitis, and
generalized “failure to thrive.” The diagnosis may be confirmed by endoscopy. Although sigmoidoscopy
is used most frequently, a complete colonoscopy is likely optimal due to the potential involvement of
the other colon segments. Treatment depends on the endoscopic findings and clinical setting. The
endoscopic findings range from mucosal ischemia to transmural necrosis. Unfortunately, it is often
difficult to differentiate diffuse mucosal ischemia from transmural necrosis. In the absence of peritonitis,
patients with mucosal ischemia alone should be treated with bowel rest, broad-spectrum antibiotics,
total parenteral nutrition, and serial endoscopic examinations. Many of these lesions resolve
spontaneously without long-term sequelae although colonic strictures may develop in a subset of
patients. Patients with transmural colonic necrosis should undergo laparotomy with resection of the
involved segment, a proximal diverting colostomy, and a distal Hartmann’s pouch. After laparotomy,
they should be maintained on broad-spectrum antibiotics and parenteral nutrition. The reported
mortality rate in patients with transmural necrosis may range up to 85%.209,210 Maintaining antegrade
flow through the internal iliac vessels, routinely implanting the inferior mesenteric artery, and avoiding
disruption of the colonic collateral circulation may reduce the incidence of this adverse outcome.
Several other gastrointestinal complications are common after standard infrarenal AAA repair.212 A
postoperative ileus develops in essentially all patients with bowel function usually returning within 3 to
5 days. An ileus may persist beyond this time period in a subset of patients although no additional
therapy is usually required. Nasogastric decompression should be continued, narcotics minimized,
electrolytes normalized, and ambulation encouraged. Either calculous or acalculous cholecystitis may
develop after aneurysm repair. The mortality rates reported historically for postoperative cholecystitis
were significant213 and served as the catalyst for simultaneous cholecystectomy and aneurysm repair.
Although this approach has been found to be safe and not associated with an increased risk for graft
infections, it is usually reserved for patients with small stones or evidence of chronic cholecystitis.
Pancreatitis may develop after AAA repair although the incidence is surprisingly low in light of the
obligatory manipulation of the pancreas during repair. The treatment of pancreatitis in this setting is
conservative and includes bowel rest, parenteral nutrition, and serial imaging.
2740
Sexual dysfunction is quite common after both open and EVAR as noted above. Erectile and/or
orgasmic dysfunction has been reported to occur in 5% to 18% of men undergoing aortoiliac
reconstruction.214 The responsible mechanisms include interruption of the pelvic perfusion and injury to
the autonomic nerves that overlie the distal aorta/proximal common iliac arteries. Injury to these
autonomic nerves disrupts the internal sphincter mechanism of the bladder and results in retrograde
ejaculation. Care should be exercised during aneurysm repair to maintain pelvic perfusion and avoid
nerve injury to prevent these untoward complications. It is imperative that these potential
complications be discussed with patients preoperatively.
Paraplegia after open infrarenal AAA repair occurs with an incidence of 0.25%.215 The potential
mechanisms for this devastating complication include embolization, thrombosis of the spinal artery, and
disruption of the spinal blood supply. Paraplegia after aneurysm repair is usually an irreversible injury.
Maintaining adequate antegrade pelvic perfusion through the internal iliac arteries may minimize this
complication.
The long-term outcome after open repair is generally favorable. Long-term survival is improved after
aneurysm repair, although it falls short of the age-matched controls with survival rates of approximately
90%, 65%, and 40% at 1, 5, and 10 years.2,13,216 Cardiovascular causes account for the leading cause of
death.217 This underscores the importance of long-term medical follow-up and the AHA/ACC Guidelines
for preventing myocardial infarction and death.170,217 Prosthetic aortic grafts are associated with longterm complications with a reported incidence of approximately 10% to 15% at 15 years.136,218,219
Notably, bifurcated grafts are associated with a higher incidence of complications (13%) than tube
grafts (5%).196 The long-term graft-related complications include infection, aortoenteric fistula,
thrombosis, and pseudoaneurysm formation. Additional aneurysms of a sufficient size to merit
intervention develop in approximately 5% to 15% of patients in either the iliac vessels or the aorta
above the prosthetic graft.196,197 It is recommended that patients undergo CT of the complete aorta and
iliac vessels 3 to 5 years postoperatively to screen for graft complications and additional aneurysms.220
Endovascular Repair of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Technique
The preoperative evaluation and preparation before endovascular AAA repair is significantly more
complicated than for the open approach. The various imaging studies must be reviewed before it can be
determined whether the endovascular approach is even feasible. Appropriate measurements must be
taken and the necessary devices/components selected. An operative plan must be generated including
specific modifications of the standard approach to overcome the patient’s anatomic limitations and,
thereby, extend the feasibility of the technique. Indeed, “preoperative planning, preoperative planning,
and preoperative planning” have facetiously been identified as the three most important components of
a successful repair.
A variety of imaging techniques (i.e., CT, catheter-based arteriography) been employed to determine
the feasibility of an aneurysm for endovascular repair and select the appropriate devices/components.
However, CT arteriography with 3D reconstructions has emerged as the optimal approach. It is
important to emphasize that no imaging technique is perfect and, consequently, a certain degree of
flexibility is necessary for the operative plan. Measurements obtained from the 3D CT tend to
overestimate the actual renal artery–internal iliac artery length assumed by the graft when deployed in
vivo. Similar sizing limitations are associated with the catheter-based arteriography techniques and
these have been attributed to the course of the catheter, the presence of intraluminal thrombus, and the
conformational changes in the aorta that result from the stiff guide wires and/or the device itself.
The various devices/components should be selected using the underlying principles that the main
body of the device should sit as close to the orifices of the renal arteries as possible while the iliac limbs
should extend to the orifices of the internal iliac arteries. This methodology not only provides exclusion
of abnormal tissue, but also extends the length of seal and fixation of the endograft, and may provide
additional column strength for grafts requiring this for durability. Furthermore, the manufacturers’
recommendations for sizing and device selection should be followed, although many publications have
demonstrated reasonable durability of some grafts even when used outside of the “IFU”.221 Grafts
seated well below the orifices of the renal arteries have been associated with proximal migration222
while oversizing the graft diameter beyond that recommended has been associated with both graft
migration and aneurysm reexpansion.223 The endograft is sized according to the anatomic configuration
of the aneurysm and adjacent arteries, and this must be performed in advance of the procedure to
ensure that the appropriate devices are available. The diameter and length of the infrarenal cuff,
2741
aneurysm, and iliac vessels must be measured precisely. In addition, the distance from the lowest renal
artery to the aortic bifurcation and both renal bifurcations needs to be determined. The diameter of the
proximal graft is chosen to oversize the aortic cuff and iliac arteries by approximately 10% to 20%.
Additional devices should be ordered for each case including two iliac limbs and an aortic extension cuff
to allow for any discrepancy between the preoperative plan and the actual course of the graft in vivo.
Each endograft procedure and device configuration is “custom fit” for an individual patient. Work sheets
are available from the manufacturers to confirm the suitability of an aneurysm for endovascular repair
and to aid in the selection of an appropriate device. Technical assistance is available from the various
manufacturers to facilitate every step of the process from initial assessment to component selection to
deployment. Furthermore, physicians typically are required to complete a training course comprised of
sizing exercises and monitored deployments.
The choice of the specific endovascular device is contingent upon the anatomic constraints of the
aneurysm, device associated outcome, and surgeon preference. There are specific differences between
the various grafts that lend themselves to different clinical scenarios. The specific considerations include
neck diameter, neck length/angulation, renal–internal iliac artery distance, common iliac artery
diameter, and access vessel diameter. For example, a graft with suprarenal fixation may be more
suitable for a shorter neck while a lower profile system (i.e., smaller outer diameter of the delivery
sheath) may be most appropriate for patients with smaller access vessels (i.e., common femoral and
external iliac arteries). Despite the initial concerns about compromising renal function, suprarenal
fixation has been consistently shown to be safe.157,224 Deployment of the various endografts is
reasonably involved from a technical standpoint; thus, it is not particularly surprising that most
surgeons elect to concentrate on one or two devices. All available endografts currently on the market
can treat a patient with “straightforward” anatomy, and a high level of comfort with a limited number
of devices has some benefit. However, a working knowledge and comfort level with all devices on the
market is advised given the benefits that each graft may have over the others in certain scenarios. This
allows use of a graft that best meets the individual patient’s needs.
The need for adjunctive procedures to facilitate the endovascular repair is usually determined by the
preoperative imaging and should be factored into the overall plan. The major concerns include stenotic
access vessels and the absence of a suitable common iliac artery landing zone due to aneurysm
enlargement. The remedial procedures for small access vessels or significant occlusive disease include
serial dilation or a retroperitoneal prosthetic iliac conduit. Repeated attempts to pass the devices
sheaths through a diseased native vessel should be avoided and can result in vessel rupture at the
common iliac bifurcation. Aneurysm degeneration of the common iliac artery can be overcome by
seating the iliac limb in the external iliac artery. This necessitates either embolizing or bypassing the
ipsilateral internal iliac artery. Alternatively, the iliac limb of the endograft can simply occlude the
internal iliac artery flush provided the iliac bifurcation is sufficiently tapered.225 Several reports have
documented that accessory renal arteries may be covered at the time of the endograft with little clinical
sequelae, although the individual patient’s baseline renal function certainly must be taken into account.
The intraoperative preparation for endovascular repair is similar to that for the open approach
although there are several significant differences. The appropriate imaging equipment is mandatory.
Ideally, this would entail a complete endovascular suite with a fixed fluoroscopic unit although a
portable unit with the appropriate vascular software and an imaging table is adequate. General
endotracheal anesthesia, local and regional anesthesia can all be used for endovascular repair,
depending on the individual patient, the clinical scenario, the planned length/complexity of the
procedure, and the comfort level of the surgeon and anesthesiologist. Indeed, the endovascular
approach is well suited for these less invasive alternatives particularly considering the feasibility of a
completely percutaneous approach. For a straightforward endovascular repair, intraoperative
autologous transfusion devices and a nasogastric tube are unnecessary. It is currently quite rare to
convert to an open repair at the time of the initial implantation despite the early experience that
reported a rate of up to 5%.75,76,78,226 However, it should be emphasized that EVAR is a surgical
procedure and most would agree that the procedure should be performed in an operating room with
strict aseptic technique.
Although the technique for implanting the various endografts is somewhat specific to the individual
device, the basic steps for deploying a “generic” modular bifurcated device using an open femoral artery
exposure is illustrated (Fig. 96-10).
2742
2743
Figure 96-10. General steps involved in the endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The common femoral arteries
are exposed bilaterally (alternatively, and more commonly, percutaneous access is achieved and “preclose” sutures are placed) and
stiff wires are introduced into the thoracic aorta under fluoroscopic guidance. An appropriate sized large diameter introducer
sheath is inserted over the stiff wire into the body of the aneurysm at approximately the L3 vertebral space on the side
contralateral to the one chosen for the main device. If the device is contained within its own deployment system, a sheath may not
be required. A: The main body delivery catheter is introduced over the stiff wire through the ipsilateral groin and the upper limit
of the main body positioned between the L1 and L2 vertebral bodies. An aortogram is obtained and the location of the renal
arteries identified. The location of the renal arteries is marked on the imaging screen and the position of the main body finely
adjusted. B, C: The main body is deployed exposing the opening of the contralateral docking limb. The contralateral docking limb
is cannulated and a stiff wire advanced into the thoracic aorta. After confirming successful cannulation of the docking limb,
deployment of the contralateral limb is deployed after marking the origin of the hypogastric artery. The hypogastric origin can be
identified by using intravascular ultrasound or by obtaining a retrograde arteriogram through the sheath in the opposite oblique
projection to identify the orifice of the internal iliac artery. D,E,F: The location of the orifice is marked on the imaging screen the
contralateral limb is then introduced over the stiff wire, appropriately positioned, and deployed A compliant aortic occlusion
balloon is advanced over the stiff wire and inflated in the region of the infrarenal neck to mold the proximal and distal attachment
sites, and used to ensure the overlapping devices are well sealed.
Percutaneous access to the common femoral arteries has become standard for many physicians using a
“preclose” methodology that involves placing a suture-based closure system that is deployed prior to
delivery of the device and closed at the conclusion of the procedure.163,164 If the surgeon is
uncomfortable with that approach, or the femoral artery anatomy precludes use of closure devices, an
open exposure works well and can be done through transverse, longitudinal or oblique incisions,
depending on the clinical scenario. Briefly, the common femoral arteries are exposed and an umbilical
tape or vessel loop is wrapped circumferentially around the vessels at the level of the inguinal ligament
to facilitate vascular control. Approximately 2 cm of the common femoral artery is dissected free. It is
not usually necessary to dissect the superficial femoral and profunda femoris branches. While the
dissection is being performed, the various device components are prepared on the back table by the
surgical technologist. A purse string suture using a 4-0 or 5-0 cardiovascular suture can be placed on the
anterior aspect of the common femoral artery and left untied until the completion of the procedure. The
various catheters/sheaths may be introduced through the center of the purse string, thereby, facilitating
a rapid/simple closure of the artery at the completion of the procedure. The common femoral artery on
the side chosen to introduce the main body of the device (ipsilateral groin) is punctured using an
angiographic needle and a 0.035-in standard working wire (e.g., Bentsen) is passed into the abdominal
aorta using fluoroscopic guidance. A 5-Fr introducer sheath is advanced over the guidewire using a
Seldinger technique and vessel entry is confirmed by manual contrast injection. The working wire is
further advanced into the thoracic aorta and exchanged for a longer 0.035-in stiffened guidewire (e.g.,
2744
Lunderquist, Meier) using a catheter. Attention is then directed to the contralateral groin and in a
similar manner a guidewire is advanced into the aorta and an appropriate sized introducer sheath is
inserted over the guidewire into the body of the aneurysm at approximately the L3 vertebral space. An
angiographic catheter is advanced to the L1 vertebral body through the contralateral sheath and the
catheter connected to the power injector. The patient is then anticoagulated with heparin using a
standard protocol (100 units/kg) and therapeutic anticoagulation (ACT twice baseline) is maintained
throughout the procedure. The main body delivery catheter is introduced over the stiff wire through the
ipsilateral groin and the upper limit of the main body positioned between the L1–L2 vertebral bodies.
Devices that do not have an integral sheath as part of their delivery system require an 18- to 22-Fr
sheath to be inserted prior to introduction of the actual delivery catheter. Radiopaque markers on the
graft facilitate the positioning and orientation of the main body.
As imaging has improved, multiple techniques allow for determining the proper location of endograft
deployment. This may involve the use of IVUS or 3D overlay imaging, both of which can decrease the
use of contrast and the radiation exposure to both the patient and practitioner. In the absence of these
advanced imaging techniques, an aortogram can be obtained after delivery of the endograft to the
location of the renal arteries and the renal arteries marked for device deployment. In this scenario, the
flat panel or image intensifier should be adjusted to optimize visualization of the infrarenal neck. A 5- to
10-degree craniocaudal angulation is usually sufficient to account for the anterior angulation of the
infrarenal neck caused by the natural lumbar lordosis of the spine and the posterior bulging of the
aneurysm sac. However, the optimal angulation or orientation may be estimated based upon the
preoperative 3D CT images. The location of the renal arteries is marked on the imaging screen and the
position of the main body adjusted. The main body is now deployed exposing the opening of the
contralateral docking limb. Using a combination of a hydrophilic wire and a curved catheter, the
contralateral docking limb is cannulated. This can be challenging at times and requires a modest degree
of catheter skills. Various maneuvers including different fluoroscopic projections, different shaped
catheters, and proper orientation of the contralateral docking limb prior to deployment of the main
body device can facilitate this step. It is imperative to confirm that the cannulating guidewire is actually
within the body of the main endograft. There are a number of methods to confirm entry into the main
aortic graft, but the surgeon should use that which he/she is most comfortable. The most definitive way
to determine successful cannulation of the docking limb is to use IVUS, but this can be accomplished by
a number of methods. A common method is to place a reverse curve catheter such as a SOS or a pigtail
catheter into the main body at the level of the neck and spinning the catheter. If the catheter spins
freely, this confirms that it is not outside of the endograft where it would be trapped between the aortic
wall and endograft. Alternatively, an arteriogram can be performed using a catheter within the main
body, confirming that dye fills the aortic graft, but not the aneurysm on initial injection. Once this is
confirmed, the contralateral wire is advanced into the proximal descending thoracic aorta under
fluoroscopic guidance and exchanged for a stiff wire using a catheter.
If IVUS is used, the hypogastric artery can be identified and marked during withdrawal of the catheter
after confirmation of docking limb catheterization, and the length measured using the radiopaque marks
on the IVUS catheter. Alternatively, placing the imaging equipment into the proper position for optimal
visualization and a retrograde injection then performed through the sheath can mark the hypogastric.
The optimal angle can be variable, and is best-determined using preoperative 3D imaging. If not
available, the typical angle required to see the hypogastric is in the opposite obliquity about 300 from
the side of the vessel (i.e., Right Anterior Oblique for the Left internal iliac artery). The location of the
orifice is marked on the imaging screen and a marker catheter is used to measure the distance from the
contralateral docking limb to confirm the preoperative measurements and device selection. The
contralateral limb is then introduced over the stiff wire, appropriately positioned relative to the docking
limb and the orifice of the internal iliac artery, and then deployed.
After deployment of all the devices, a compliant aortic occlusion balloon is advanced over the
ipsilateral stiff wire and inflated in the region of the infrarenal neck to mold the proximal attachment
sites. The aortic balloon is then withdrawn and gently expanded at the main body/iliac limb overlap
zone and both distal iliac artery fixation sites. A completion arteriogram is then obtained using an
angiographic catheter placed through one of the introducer sheaths (Fig. 96-11). The arteriogram should
adequately evaluate the proximal/distal fixation sites, the graft/graft overlap zones and the orifices of
the renal/internal iliac arteries. In addition, it should include delayed imaging to help identify any
endoleaks. Problems identified on the completion study should be corrected, if possible. The potential
remedial procedures include balloon dilation or aortic/iliac extension cuffs.
2745
Figure 96-11. Completion arteriogram after an endovascular aneurysm repair is shown. The arrow marks the caudal extent of the
stent graft. Note that the iliac limbs have been intentionally crossed to facilitate the cannulation of the contralateral gate.
With open femoral exposure, all sheaths, catheters, and wires are removed after the completion of the
arteriogram and the femoral arteriotomy closed using the previously placed purse–string suture. When
using percutaneous closure methods, the wire is typically left in during closure to allow placement of
additional closure devices as necessary. Pedal Doppler signals should be confirmed prior to removal of
the wire and completion of arterial closure. The heparin can then be reversed with protamine (1 mg
protamine/100 units heparin) after adequate signals are detected in the feet. The groin wounds are
closed in layers with absorbable suture and the final skin later is closed with a subcuticular technique.
The immediate postoperative course is typically fairly uneventful. Patients are transferred to the
general care ward after recovery in the postanesthesia care unit. Patients are started on an appropriate
diet the evening of the procedure and encouraged to get out of bed. Patients should be kept supine for 4
to 6 hours after the operation when a percutaneous technique is used to ensure successful hemostasis.
Plain radiographs of the abdomen (4 views, optimized for metal) can be obtained on the first
postoperative day for a baseline position of the grafts, but this is not routine in many centers. Most
infrarenal EVAR patients are discharged home on postoperative day 1 or 2, and then seen in the
outpatient clinic at 1 month with an abdominal/pelvic CT scan. It is important to note that mild fever
and the finding of air around the graft on CT are common occurrences immediately after endograft
repair and have not been associated with graft infection.227
9 It is imperative that patients are followed long-term given the uncertainty associated with the
endovascular repair and the need for remedial procedures. As noted above, new endoleaks have been
identified many years after repair.228 A variety of protocols and imaging techniques have been
described although an abdominal/pelvic CT scan with contrast at 12 months and then yearly
noncontrast studies seems reasonable in the absence of any identifiable problems and an aneurysm sac
that is not increasing in size. Indeed, Sternbergh et al.229 reported from a multicenter trial that the
absence of an endoleak at 1 and 12 months predicted favorable long-term outcome. More frequent
imaging may be indicated if the aneurysm continues to grow or there is evidence of an endoleak. The
surveillance CT scans should include noncontrast and biphasic contrast views with delayed images to
help identify any late endoleaks.230 Calcified material will frequently be present in the aortic sac, and
can masquerade as contrast. The noncontrasted portion of the CT will help determine the nature of this
material and can be very helpful when combined with contrasted imaging. Although not part of all
surveillance protocols, early plain radiographs are very helpful to identify structural changes/problems
with the grafts, and are sometimes more useful than CT in identifying issues with the metal skeleton of
the graft. Duplex ultrasound has been employed as a surveillance study, but its accuracy is dependent on
the local expertise of the vascular laboratory.231–233
Complications and Outcome
The mortality rates in the recent randomized trials and national series is less than 2%,69,70,74,111 the
perioperative complication rate is <25%,73,136 the rupture risk is approximately 1%/yr,136,141 and the
2746
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع