ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: As nearly 50% of cancer patients receive radiation therapy (RT) as treatment, the effects of RT on the outcomes of future total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the odds of developing medical and surgical adverse events following THA in patients who have a history of RT.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national database to identify patients who underwent primary THA (Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 27130) from 2002 to 2022. Patients who had a prior RT were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes Z51.0 (encounter for antineoplastic RT), Z92.3 (personal history of irradiation), or CPT code 101843 (radiation oncology treatment). One-to-one propensity score matching was conducted to generate 3 pairs of cohorts: 1) THA with/without history of RT; 2) THA with/without history of cancer; and 3) THA patients who have a history of cancer treated with/without RT. Surgical and medical complications were assessed at the 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year postoperative periods.
RESULTS: Patients who have a history of RT had higher odds of developing anemia, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and prosthetic joint infection at all intervals. When controlling for a history of cancer, RT was associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism, heterotrophic ossification, prosthetic joint infection, and periprosthetic fracture at all post-operative time points. There was additionally an increased risk of aseptic loosening at 1-year (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.0, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.2-3.1).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that patients who have a history of antineoplastic RT are at an increased risk of developing various surgical and medical complications following THA.
PMID:37301238 | DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.066
07:32
Photo
Not included, change data exporting settings to download.
1200×1200, 39.0 KB
07:32
In reply to this message
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications in patients with cancer and isolated distal deep vein thrombosis
Thromb Res. 2023 Jun 4;228:81-84. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.05.027. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is a common clinical presentation of DVT. The efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy for the management of IDDVT in patients with cancer are unclear. We sought to assess the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding in this patient population.
METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed, from inception to June 2, 2022 was performed. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The secondary outcomes were clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and mortality. The incidence rates of thrombotic, bleeding, and mortality outcomes were pooled using random effects model and expressed as events per 100 patient-months with associated 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS: Out of a total of 5234 articles, 10 observational studies including 8160 patients with cancer and IDDVT were included in the analysis. The incidence rate of recurrent VTE was 5.65 (95 % CI: 2.09-15.30) per 100 patient-years regardless of type and duration of anticoagulant therapy. The incidence rate of major bleeding was 4.08 (95 % CI: 2.52-6.61) per 100 patient-years. The incidence rates for CRNMB and mortality per 100 patient-years were 8.11 (95 % CI: 5.56-11.83) and 30.22 (95 % CI: 22.60-40.42.89), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Patients with cancer and IDDVT are at high risk of developing recurrent VTE and bleeding complications (both major bleeding and CRNMB). More studies are needed to define the optimal management for this high-risk population.
PMID:37301116 | DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.05.027
07:32
Photo
Not included, change data exporting settings to download.
1200×1200, 39.0 KB
07:32
In reply to this message
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential in patients with venous thromboembolism
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02836-4. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Over the last decade, the concept of Clonal haematopoiesis of undetermined potential (CHIP) has emerged. Low frequency somatic mutations in hematopoietic cells can occur with age and might allow formation of clones in individuals with no characterized haematological pathology. These CHIP mutations are associated with an increased risk of cancer or atherothrombosis, and their prevalence are more and more studied in pathologies with an inflammatory component. In our study, we analysed, by next generation sequencing, the prevalence of CHIP mutation in 94 patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), distinguishing two clinical phenotypes: provoked distal and non-provoked proximal DVTs. We show that there is no difference in CHIP prevalence between these two groups, nor with a matched-aged control group. The number of mutation per patients and the affected genes remain also the same between the three groups. Consequently and despite the relative small number of patients in each cohort, it seems that CHIP is not a strong concern in venous thromboembolism.
PMID:37300604 | DOI:10.1007/s11239-023-02836-4
07:32
Photo
Not included, change data exporting settings to download.
1200×1200, 39.0 KB
07:32
In reply to this message
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Diagnostic Approach for Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;15(11):3031. doi: 10.3390/cancers15113031.
ABSTRACT
Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is a common complication in cancer patients. The currently recommended VTE diagnostic approach involves a step-by-step algorithm, which is based on the assessment of clinical probability, D-dimer measurement, and/or diagnostic imaging. While this diagnostic strategy is well validated and efficient in the noncancer population, its use in cancer patients is less satisfactory. Cancer patients often present nonspecific VTE symptoms resulting in less discriminatory power of the proposed clinical prediction rules. Furthermore, D-dimer levels are often increased because of a hypercoagulable state associated with the tumor process. Consequently, the vast majority of patients require imaging tests. In order to improve VTE exclusion in cancer patients, several approaches have been developed. The first approach consists of ordering imaging tests to all patients, despite overexposing a population known to have mostly multiple comorbidities to radiations and contrast products. The second approach consists of new diagnostic algorithms based on clinical probability assessment with different D-dimer thresholds, e.g., the YEARS algorithm, which shows promise in improving the diagnosis of PE in cancer patients. The third approach uses an adjusted D-dimer threshold, to age, pretest probability, clinical criteria, or other criteria. These different diagnostic strategies have not been compared head-to-head. In conclusion, despite having several proposed diagnostic approaches to diagnose VTE in cancer patients, we still lack a dedicated diagnostic algorithm specific for this population.
PMID:37296993 | PMC:PMC10252026 | DOI:10.3390/cancers15113031
07:32
In reply to this message
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Low Molecular Weight Heparin Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Cancer Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism: A Nationwide Cohort Study in France
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 31;15(11):3011. doi: 10.3390/cancers15113011.
ABSTRACT
Patients with cancer have an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) and an increased risk of death from VTE. Until recently, the standard of care for treatment of VTE in cancer patients was low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). To determine treatment patterns and outcomes, we performed an observational study using a nationwide health database. Treatment patterns, rates of bleeding, and VTE recurrence at 6 and 12 months were assessed in cancer patients with VTE in France prescribed LMWH in 2013-2018. Of 31,771 patients administered LMWH (mean age 66.3 years), 51.0% were male, 58.7% had pulmonary embolism, and 70.9% had metastatic disease. At 6 months LMWH persistence was 81.6%, VTE recurrence had occurred in 1256 patients (4.0%) at a crude rate per 100 person-months (PM) of 0.90, and bleeding had occurred in 1124 patients (3.5%) at a crude rate per 100 PM of 0.81. At 12 months, VTE recurrence had occurred in 1546 patients (4.9%) at a crude rate per 100 PM of 0.71 and bleeding had occurred in 1438 patients (4.5%) at a crude rate per 100 PM of 0.66. Overall, VTE-related clinical event rates were high among patients administered LMWH, suggesting an unmet medical need.
PMID:37296971 | PMC:PMC10251904 | DOI:10.3390/cancers15113011
07:32
In reply to this message
PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE
Covariate-specific ROC curve analysis can accommodate differences between covariate subgroups in the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jun 7:S0895-4356(23)00142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.001. Online ahead of print.
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع