zer

zer

ad2

zer

ad2

zer

Search This Blog

Translate

خلفيات وصور / wallpapers and pictures images / fond d'écran photos galerie / fondos de pantalla en i

Buscar este blog

10/26/25

 


9. Crockett SD, Snover DC, Ahnen DJ, et al. Sessile serrated adenomas:an evidence-based guide to

management. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13:11–26.

10. Rosty C, Buchanan DD, Walsh MD, et al. Phenotype and polyp landscape in serrated polyposis

syndrome: a series of 100 patients from genetics clinics. Am J Surg Pathol 2012;36:876–882.

11. Snover D, Ahnen D, Burt R, et al. Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated

(hyperplastic) polyposis. In: Bozman F, Carniro FM, Hruban R, et al., eds. WHO Classification of

Tumours of the Digestive System. 4th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010.

12. Raju GS, Vadyal V, Slack R, et al. Adenoma detection rate in patients undergoing a comprehensive

colonoscopy screening. Cancer Med 2013;2:391–402.

13. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gerdes H, et al. Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with

adenomatous polyps. National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1996;334:82–87.

14. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Stegmaier C, et al. Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to

colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840,149 screening colonoscopies. Gut

2009;56:1585–1589.

15. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of

colorectal cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:687–696.

16. Yurgulun MB, Goel A, Hornick JL, et al. Microsatellite instability and DNA mismatch repair protein

deficiency in Lynch syndrome colorectal polyps. Cancer Prev Res(Phila) 2012;5:574–582.

17. Edelstein DL, Axilbund J, Baxter M, et al. Rapid development of colorectal neoplasia in patients

with Lynch syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9:340–343.

18. Boland CR, Lynch HT. The history of Lynch syndrome. Fam Cancer 2013; 12:145–157.

19. Hamilton SR, Liu B, Parsons RE, et al. The molecular basis of Turcot’s syndrome. N Engl J Med

1995;332:839–847.

20. Levin B, Lieberman DA, Mcfarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of

colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer

Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of

Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:130–160.

21. U.S. Preventative Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventative Services

Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Int Med 2008;149:627–637.

22. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson HC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for

colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:739–750.

23. Segnan N, Patrick J, von Karsa L (eds). European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal

screening and diagnosis. Luxembourg: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010;1–386.

24. Swan S, Siddiqui AA, Meyers RE. International colorectal cancer screening programs: population

contact strategies., testing methods and screening rates. Pract Gastroenterol 2012;20–29.

25. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for

fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1365–1371.

26. Mandel JS. Screening of patients at average risk for colon cancer. Med Clin North Am 2005;89:43–

59.

27. Haug UH, Hundt S, Brenner H. Quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing for

colorectal adenoma detection: evaluation in the target population of screening and comparison with

qualitative tests. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:682–690.

28. De Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Immunochemical fecal occult blood testing is

equally sensitive for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1570–

1578.

29. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer

screening. N Engl J Med 2014;371:187–188.

30. Atkin W, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy screening in the prevention of

colorectal cancer :a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375:1624–1633.

31. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal incidence and mortality with screening

flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2345–2357.

1757

32. Segnan N, Armoroli P, Bonelli L, et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening:

follow up findings of the Italian randomized controlled trial–SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst

2011;103:1310–1322.

33. Lakoff J, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after

a negative colonoscopy: a population based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:1117–1121.

34. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal

cancer. Ann Int Med 2009;150:1–8.

35. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Association between colonoscopy rates and colorectal cancer

mortality. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:1627–1632.

36. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Volker A, et al. Protection from right-and left-sided colorectal

neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:89–95.

37. Stock C, Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar L, et al. Colorectal cancer mortality prevented by use and

attributable to colonoscopy. Gastrointestuinal Endosc 2011;73:435–443.

38. Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, et al. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after

colonoscopy varies by site of cancer. Gastroenterology 2010;139:1128–1137.

39. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic

adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 2000;343:169–174.

40. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for

colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000;343:162–168.

41. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed)

colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 2008;299:1027–1035.

42. Johnson DJ, Chen M-H, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large

adenomas and cancer. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1207–1217.

43. Kim D, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of

advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1403–1412.

44. Patel S, Ahnen DJ. Prevention of interval colorectal cancers: what every clinician needs to know.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;12:7–15.

45. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Krazewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of

interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1995–1803.

46. Baxter NN, Sutradhar R, Forbes SS, et al. Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality

measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2011;140:65–72.

47. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five year colon surveillance after screening

colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007;133:1077–1085.

48. Lieberman DA. Colon polyp surveillance: clinical decision tool. Gastroenterology 2014;146:305–306.

49. Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Albert PS, et al. Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines:

predictive accuracy for advanced adenomas at 4 years. Ann Int Med 2008;148:419–426.

50. Logan RF, Grainge MJ, Shepherd VC, et al. Aspirin and folic acid for prevention of recurrent

colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 2008;134:29–38.

51. Baron JA, Cole BF, Sandler RS, et al. A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas.

N Engl J Med 2003;348:891–899.

52. Bertagnolli MM, Eagle CJ, Zauber AG, et al. Celecoxib for the prevention of sporadic colorectal

adenomas. N Engl J Med 2006;355:873–884.

53. Meyskins FL, McLaren CE, Pelot D, et al. Difluoromethylornithine plus sulindac for the prevention

of sporadic colorectal adenomas: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Cancer Prev

Res 2008;1:9–11.

54. Grau M, Baron JA, Sandler RS, et al. Prolonged effect of calcium supplementation on risk of

colorectal adenomas in a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:129–136.

55. West N, Phillips RK, Hutchinson JM, et al. Eicosapentaenoic acid reduces rectal polyp number and

size in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut 2010; 59:918–925.

56. Giardiello FM, Krush AJ, Petersen GM, et al. Phenotypic variability of familial adenomatous

polyposis in 11 unrelated families with identical APC gene mutation. Gastroenterology

1994;106:1542–1547.

57. Vasen HF, Moslein G, Alonso A, et al. Guidelines for the clinical management of familial

1758

adenomatous polyposis. Gut 2008;57:704–713.

58. Skipworth JR, Morkane C, Raptis DA, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced duodenal and

ampullary adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis. HBP (Oxford) 201;13:342–349.

59. Sieber OM, Lipton L, Crabtree M, et al. Multiple colorectal adenomas, classic adenomatous

polyposis, and germ-line mutations in MYH. N Engl J Med 2003;348:791–799.

60. Vogt S, Jones N, Christian D, et al. Expanded extracolonic tumor spectrum in MUTYH-associated

polyposis. Gastroenterology 2009;137:1976–1985.

61. Wang L, Baudhuin LM, Boardman LA, et al. MYH mutations in patients with attenuated and classic

polyposis and with young-onset colorectal cancer without polyps. Gastroenterology 2004;127:9–16.

62. Jones N, Vogt S, Nielsen M, et al. Increased colorectal cancer incidence in obligate carriers of

heterozygous mutations in MUTYH. Gastroenterology 2009;137:489–494.

63. Bresalier RS. Management of high-risk colonoscopy patients. Gastrointest Endos Clin N Am.

2010;20:629–640.

64. Howe JR, Sayed MG, Ahmed AF, et al. The prevalence of MADH4 and BMPR1A mutations in

juvenile polyposis and absence of BMPR2, BMPR1B, and ACVR1 mutations. J Med Genet

2004;41:484–491.

65. Howe JR, Shellnut J, Wagner B, et al. Common deletion of SMAD4 in juvenile polyposis is a

mutational hotspot. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70:1357–1362.

66. Marsh DJ, Coulon V, Lunetta KL, et al. Mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype analyses in

Cowden disease and Bannayan-Zonana syndrome, two hamartoma syndromes with germline PTEN

mutation. Hum Mol Genet 1998;7:507–515.

67. Chi SG, Kim HJ, Park BJ, et al. Mutational abrogation of the PTEN/MMAC1 gene in

gastrointestinal polyps in patients with Cowden disease. Gastroenterology 1998;115:1084–1089.

68. Marra G, Armelao F, Vecchio FM, et al. Cowden’s disease with extensive gastrointestinal polyposis.

J Clin Gastroenterol 1994;18:42–47.

69. Tan MH, Mester JL, Ngeow J, et al. Lifetime cancer risks in individuals with germline PTEN

mutations. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:400–407.

70. Eng C. PTEN: one gene, many syndromes. Hum Mutat 2003;22:183–198.

1759

Chapter 68

Colorectal Cancer

Julio Garcia-Aguilar

Key Points

1 Incidence and overall mortality for colorectal cancer (CRC) are decreasing, most likely due to

increased screening. Risk-factor modification and improved therapy also likely contribute to this

trend.

2 Our greater understanding of the molecular biology of CRC may provide a means of identifying

disease biomarkers and developing more targeted therapies.

3 Advances in imaging techniques have improved risk stratification via more accurate baseline tumor

staging and treatment selection.

4 Improved risk stratification and neoadjuvant therapy have enabled physicians to eliminate some

therapeutic components in some patients’ treatment regimens.

5 Use of laparoscopic and robotic surgical techniques in combination with enhanced recovery

programs has accelerated patient recovery, reduced length of hospital stay, and reduced

postoperative complications.

6 While long-term survival for patients with stage IV disease remains low, median survival for these

patients has improved significantly in recent years, probably due to more effective chemotherapy

and more aggressive surgery.

7 Multidisciplinary treatment involving surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation

oncologists, as well as liver surgeons, gastroenterologists, and stoma therapists improves outcomes

and quality of life in patients with CRC.

Colorectal cancer kills tens of thousands of people every year in the United States. If diagnosed at an

early stage, however, it is one of the most curable malignancies. Identification of populations at risk

and screening of asymptomatic patients are therefore crucial imperatives. This chapter provides a

comprehensive overview of the disease, including epidemiology, risk factors, molecular characteristics,

progression, staging, screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

1 Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy and the second most common cause of

cancer death in the United States. It is estimated that in 2015, a total of 132,700 people were diagnosed

with CRC in the United States, and 49,700 died from the disease.1 Approximately 1 in 20 Americans will

be diagnosed with CRC in their lifetime. Death from CRC could be reduced significantly by applying

current knowledge about screening, early diagnosis, and treatment standards. The incidence and

mortality rates for CRC have been decreasing for the last three decades, but the decreases have

accelerated since 2001 (Fig. 68-1). Between 2007 and 2011, the incidence of CRC decreased at a rate of

3.6% for both genders, and mortality at a rate of 2.6% in males and 3% in females. The declines in

incidence and mortality have been attributed to the detection and removal of precancerous polyps as a

result of CRC screening programs, changing patterns in CRC risk factors, and improvements in

treatment.

The incidence and mortality rates for CRC increase with age. The median age at colon cancer

diagnosis is 69 years in men and 74 years in women; for rectal cancer, 63 in men and 65 in women.

More than 90% of CRCs are diagnosed in patients 50 years or older. Both the incidence and mortality

for CRC are 30% to 40% higher in men than in women. The reasons for these differences are not

completely understood but probably reflect an interaction between risk factors and hormonal

differences. There are also gender differences in the distribution of CRC, with a higher proportion of

1760

No comments:

Post a Comment

اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع

Popular Posts

Popular Posts

Popular Posts

Popular Posts

Translate

Blog Archive

Blog Archive

Featured Post

  ABSTRACT Doxorubicin (Dox) is a highly potent chemotherapy drug. Despite its efficacy, Dox's clinical application is limited due to it...