1459CHAPTER 190 Principles of Medical Virology
viral DNA genomes; alternatively, they can use reverse transcription of
RNA followed by PCR to detect a DNA product in clinical samples as a
means to detect viral RNA sequences. Multiple primers can be used in a
multiplex reaction to detect multiple pathogens. The process of nucleic
acid isolation, reverse transcription, and PCR has been automated, and
high-throughput instruments measure the HIV load in serum samples.
HSV-1 DNA can be measured in cerebrospinal fluid as a rapid assay for
HSV encephalitis. These methods have also been transferred to rapid
assays for point-of-care detection of viral genomes.
Viral Antigens Viral antigens can be detected by immunologic
methods such as immunofluorescence and enzyme immunosorbent
assay (EIA). Immunofluorescence involves fixation and permeabilization of cells or tissues from clinical specimens and reaction with
either (1) an antiviral antibody conjugated to a fluorophore (direct
immunofluorescence) or (2) an antiviral antibody followed by an
anti-immunoglobulin antibody conjugated to a fluorophore (indirect
immunofluorescence), with detection of the fluorophore by fluorescence microscopy in either case.
The EIA entails the immobilization of an antiviral antibody on a
substrate such as a microtiter well, incubation of the patient’s sample in
the well, and further incubation with an antibody linked to an enzyme.
The bound enzyme is then measured by production of a colored substrate that can be read spectrophotometrically.
Hemagglutination Some viruses have the ability to cross-link and
agglutinate red blood cells of specific species, a process called hemagglutination. Viral titer is measured by the inverse of the last dilution of
the sample that causes hemagglutination.
Quantitative Assays of Viruses Viruses can be quantified in
terms of virion particle numbers and/or infectivity. The number of
virion particles in a sample can be determined by negative staining and
observation by EM. The numbers of viral DNA genomes can be determined by PCR, and RNA genomes can be determined by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), as described above. Alternatively, purified
viral particles can be quantified biochemically by spectrophotometric
assays that measure viral protein.
The number of infectious particles can be quantified by an endpoint
dilution assay in which the virus is diluted until only one-half of cultures are infected; this concentration is designated the tissue culture
infectious dose for 50% of cultures, or TCID50. An alternative assay can
determine at what dose one-half of experimental animals die of viral
disease (lethal dose for 50% of test animals, or LD50). A more quantitative assay of infectivity is the plaque assay. A plaque is an area of visualized localized CPE. In the plaque assay, dilutions of the virus sample are
placed on cells attached to a culture dish, and after adsorption of the
virus to cells, the cells are overlaid with semisolid medium or medium
containing antibody, which prevents virus diffusion through the
medium. Virus then spreads only cell to cell, causing a restricted area
of CPE—a plaque—on the cellular monolayer. The number of plaques
formed by each dilution of virus defines the titer in plaque-forming
units (PFUs) per volume of virus stock.
For viruses that infect humans, the ratio of viral particles to infectious units, or the particle-to-PFU ratio, is always much greater than
1—usually 10–1000. This result signifies a large excess of particles that
are defective and/or that do not score as infectious in laboratory assays.
Thus, for experimental purposes, following input virus particles, either
visually or biochemically, does not guarantee that the observer is following the real infection pathway. Accordingly, clinical preparations of
viruses used for vaccines, vaccine vectors, gene therapy vectors, and
oncolytic viruses need to be defined precisely and specifically in terms
of particles versus infectious units for accurate and safe dosing. As an
example, a recent adenovirus-based COVID vaccine was quantified on
the basis of spectrophotometric measurement of purified virions. After
the trial was initiated, lower than expected reactogenicity led to a reexamination of the vaccine dose. An excipient discovered in the vaccine
was found to cause errors in spectrophotometric measurement that led
to an overestimate of the virus concentration. Parallel measurements
of viral genomes with RT-PCR allowed a more accurate measurement
of the vaccine vector batches, and the dose was revised to one-half of
the original level. This example illustrates the importance of precise
measurements of viral particles and infectious particles in clinical
preparations of viruses.
DETECTION OF VIRUS-SPECIFIC
ANTIBODIES
The presence of virus-specific antibodies provides evidence of prior
infection with a virus or prior exposure to viral antigens through
immunization; thus, antibody tests are extremely important clinically.
The most common tests for antibodies are the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the Western blot or immunoblot assay.
An ELISA involves the immobilization of viral antigen on a substrate
such as a microtiter well, its incubation with the patient’s serum, and
further incubation with an antibody to human IgG coupled to an
enzyme. The amount of bound antibody is measured by detection
of a colored product made by the bound enzyme. The Western blot
assay involves the resolution of viral proteins in a polyacrylamide gel,
their transfer to a membrane, incubation with the patient’s serum, and
further incubation with antibody to human IgG coupled to an enzyme.
Proteins with bound antibodies are detected as a colored product made
by the bound antibody. The Western blot detects antigen of a specific
size and therefore is more specific than ELISA. For example, HIV
serologic testing involves high-throughput ELISA screening followed
by a Western blot assay to confirm the specificity of any positive ELISA
result.
In a hemagglutination inhibition assay, antibodies specific for viral
surface proteins are detected by their ability to block hemagglutination.
IMMUNIZATION AGAINST VIRAL DISEASES
Viral vaccines are among the most effective biomedical and public health
measures that have been implemented: millions of deaths have been prevented by their use. These vaccines are safe because extensive protocols
have been developed for monitoring vaccine safety both before and after
licensure. Historically, viral vaccines were based on either inactivated
virus or live attenuated viruses, as exemplified by the Salk polio vaccine
and the Sabin live attenuated polio vaccine, respectively. Both of these
vaccines were quite successful, offering individual advantages. Further
vaccine types have been developed, including those based on recombinant proteins, viral vectors, and, most recently, mRNA. For each virus,
the optimal antigen and immunization strategy must be developed on
the basis of the virus-specific immune correlates, antibodies, or T cells
needed for immunologic protection against infection and disease. These
concepts are discussed in greater detail in Chap. 123.
ANTIVIRAL THERAPEUTICS
■ ANTIVIRAL DRUGS
Viruses replicate in human cells and use much of the host cell’s machinery. Therefore, antiviral drugs must target virus-specific events to
optimize safety. Viral targets for drugs have been identified in studies
of the mechanisms of viral infection and replication (Chap. 191). Many
of the most successful antiviral drugs target viral enzymes; examples
include the anti-HSV drugs that target the virus DNA polymerases and
thymidine kinase (Chap. 191) and the HIV drugs that target the virus
reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase (Chap. 202).
■ VIRUSES AS THERAPEUTICS
Viruses have been engineered for a number of medical purposes,
including gene delivery and tumor cell killing. As described above,
viruses have been developed as vaccines and vaccine vectors. For
example, vesicular stomatitis virus–based vectors have been employed
as Ebola vaccines. Adenovirus-based vectors have been used as
AIDS vaccine vectors and are now being used as COVID-19 vaccine
vectors. Viral recombinants, including those of retroviruses and
adeno-associated viruses, have been approved as vectors for delivery
of genes to cells for treatment of single-gene defects. Retroviruses
integrate into the cell’s chromosomes and are maintained with stable
expression of the transgene, although some concerns have arisen
1460 PART 5 Infectious Diseases
about possible activation of neighboring promoters and adverse effects
due to that activation. Adeno-associated viruses are not integrated
but are stably maintained and capable of durable expression of the
transgene. Adenoviruses and herpesviruses are also being tested as
gene therapy vectors. Finally, an attenuated strain of HSV expressing
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor has been approved
for treatment of melanoma because of its oncolytic and immunotherapeutic properties. Many additional studies are assessing viruses for
use as vectors and for immunotherapeutic and oncolytic applications.
SUMMARY
As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses enter host cells, replicate,
and spread in the form of progeny viruses. Injury to the host cell
resulting from viral entry may lead to tissue and organ damage.
Basic knowledge of the mechanisms underlying infection by and replication of viruses that infect humans is the foundation for medical
studies of viral pathogenesis, viral vaccines, antiviral drugs, and the use
of viruses as therapeutics. A broad knowledge of all viruses is essential
to our preparedness for the next viral epidemic or pandemic.
■ FURTHER READING
Helenius A: Virus entry: Looking back and moving forward. J Mol
Biol 43:1853, 2018.
Howley PM et al (eds): Fields Virology: Vol. 1: Emerging Viruses,
7th ed. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Health, 2020.
Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds): Fields Virology, 6th ed. Philadelphia,
Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health, 2013.
Knipe DM et al: Ensuring vaccine safety. Science 370:1274, 2020.
Ksiazek TG et al: A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute
respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 348:1953, 2003.
Voysey M et al: Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine
(AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet
397:99, 2021.
Zhou P et al: A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579:270, 2020.
Most antiviral drugs inhibit viral DNA or RNA replication, but other
activities, such as virus entry, viral RNA transcription, cleavage of proteins by the viral protease, virus uncoating after infection, and virus
release from cells, are all targeted by different licensed antiviral agents.
Inhibition of viral replication does not eliminate the virus in the cell;
host cell immune responses are important for viral clearance. Antiviral drugs usually do not eradicate latent viral infections, but instead
usually inhibit viral replication; thus, when treatment is stopped, the
virus can reactivate and replicate again. Resistance to antiviral agents
due to mutations in viral proteins is not uncommon and is more
common for RNA viruses with a higher mutation rate than for DNA
viruses. This difference may explain the observation that drug-resistant
DNA viruses are a greater problem in immunocompromised patients,
whereas drug-resistant RNA viruses can be found in healthy persons
as well. Patients may harbor a mixture of drug-resistant and drugsensitive viruses that is dynamic and changes under pressure from
the drug. Combination therapy with more than one antiviral agent,
each with a different mechanism of action, may be more effective than
191 Antiviral Chemotherapy,
Excluding Antiretroviral
Drugs
Jeffrey I. Cohen, Eleanor Wilson
monotherapy, particularly against RNA viruses, which may be present
as mixtures with different resistance patterns. Antiviral testing can
be performed in patients who do not respond to antiviral drugs or
whose response diminishes. For some viruses, such testing involves the
sequencing of selected viral genes; however, in many cases, it involves
the growth of virus in the presence of different concentrations of the
drug, which is a laborious, time-consuming process. Response to antiviral therapy has traditionally been assessed clinically, but quantitative
PCR has been useful in monitoring the response to therapy for viruses
that circulate in the blood (e.g., cytomegalovirus [CMV], hepatitis B
and C viruses [HBV and HCV, respectively]). Systemic therapy with
antivirals is usually more effective than topical therapy but is more
commonly associated with side effects.
ANTIVIRAL DRUGS FOR HERPESVIRUS
INFECTIONS
■ ACYCLOVIR, VALACYCLOVIR, FAMCICLOVIR,
AND PENCICLOVIR
Acyclovir is an analogue of deoxyguanosine and is phosphorylated to
the monophosphate form by viral thymidine kinase in cells infected
with herpes simplex virus (HSV) or varicella-zoster virus (VZV).
Cellular protein kinases further phosphorylate the drug to the active
triphosphate form, which inhibits viral DNA polymerase; the drug is
incorporated into viral DNA to terminate its replication. Valacyclovir,
a valine ester of acyclovir, is absorbed much better than acyclovir; its
rapid conversion to acyclovir in the liver and intestine results in plasma
acyclovir levels approximately four times higher than are attained with
oral acyclovir. Acyclovir and valacyclovir are approved by the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of initial episodes of genital herpes, recurrent genital herpes, varicella, and zoster
(Table 191-1). Valacyclovir is also approved for treatment of herpes
labialis (cold sores), for suppression of recurrences of genital herpes,
and for reduction of transmission of genital HSV. The doses of acyclovir and valacyclovir used for treating VZV infections are higher than
those used for HSV infections since VZV is less susceptible to inhibition by these drugs. Both drugs exhibit poor activity against CMV.
Intravenous acyclovir is used for severe disease requiring hospitalization; oral acyclovir or valacyclovir is used for outpatient therapy; and
topical acyclovir, penciclovir, and docosanol are approved for treatment of orolabial herpes but are much less effective than the oral drugs.
Acyclovir is excreted by the kidneys. Thus the dose of acyclovir
or valacyclovir needs to be reduced with renal insufficiency. Central
nervous system (CNS) side effects that occur with IV acyclovir or oral
valacyclovir are more common with the higher drug levels seen in
persons with renal insufficiency. Reversible renal insufficiency due to
crystallization of the drug in renal tubules can occur with IV acyclovir,
especially in persons who are dehydrated. Headache, nausea, rash, and
diarrhea have been reported with acyclovir. Mutations in the HSV or
VZV thymidine kinase or, less commonly, in viral DNA polymerase
can result in resistance to acyclovir or valacyclovir. Viruses lacking
thymidine kinase activity are also resistant to famciclovir and ganciclovir. Acyclovir- and valacyclovir-resistant HSV and VZV are rare in
immunocompetent persons. Resistant virus is treated with foscarnet
or, less commonly, cidofovir. Mucosal disease due to resistant virus
in immunocompromised persons is sometimes treated with topical
foscarnet, trifluridine, or cidofovir.
Famciclovir is a diacetyl ester of penciclovir that is converted to penciclovir in the intestine and liver. Penciclovir is a guanosine analogue
that is less potent than acyclovir, but, because of its longer intracellular
half-life, its activity is similar to that of acyclovir. Penciclovir is phosphorylated by HSV and VZV thymidine and cellular kinases and has
activity similar to that of acyclovir for HSV and VZV infections. Famciclovir is approved for treatment of zoster, suppression of genital herpes, and treatment of recurrent mucocutaneous herpes in patients with
HIV infection. Famciclovir is excreted by the kidneys, and the dose is
adjusted for renal insufficiency. Side effects are uncommon and can
include headache, nausea, and diarrhea. Resistance due to mutations
in viral thymidine kinase or DNA polymerase can occur.
1461CHAPTER 191 Antiviral Chemotherapy, Excluding Antiretroviral Drugs
■ GANCICLOVIR AND VALGANCICLOVIR
Ganciclovir is a deoxyguanosine analog that is phosphorylated by UL97
protein kinase in cells infected with CMV and converted to its active
form, ganciclovir triphosphate, by cellular protein kinases. Ganciclovir
triphosphate inhibits both viral DNA polymerase and incorporation of
guanosine triphosphate into viral DNA. Valganciclovir is a valine ester
of ganciclovir and is converted to ganciclovir in the liver and intestine.
Valganciclovir has much better oral bioavailability than ganciclovir;
plasma levels of oral valganciclovir and IV ganciclovir are similar.
Ganciclovir and valganciclovir are used for treatment and prevention
of CMV disease in immunocompromised patients and are approved for
prevention of CMV infection in transplant recipients and for treatment
of CMV retinitis. Ganciclovir is effective against HSV, VZV, human
herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6), and herpes B virus. This drug is excreted
by the kidneys, and dose adjustment is required in renal insufficiency.
Ganciclovir therapy often results in neutropenia and thrombocytopenia after 1 week. Less commonly, ganciclovir has been associated with
CNS symptoms, particularly at high plasma drug levels. Mutations in
TABLE 191-1 Antiviral Drugs for Herpesvirus Treatment and Prophylaxis in Adults
DISEASE DRUG ROUTE ADULT DOSE COMMENTS
Orolabial herpes, primary
episode
Acyclovir
Valacyclovir
Famciclovir
Oral
Oral
Oral
400 mg tid × 7–10 d
1 g bid × 7–10 d
500 mg bid or 250 mg tid × 7–10 d
Reduces duration of fever, lesions, and
virus shedding
Orolabial herpes, recurrence Acyclovir
Valacyclovir
Famciclovir
Oral
Oral
Oral
400 mg 5 times daily × 5 d
2 g bid × 1 d
1500 mg × 1 d
Reduces duration of lesions by 1–2 d if given
during prodrome
Orolabial herpes, suppression Acyclovir
Valacyclovir
Famciclovir
Oral
Oral
Oral
400 mg bid
500 mg or 1 g once daily
500 mg bid
In patients with >6 recurrences per year,
reduces number of recurrences by ~50%
and increases time to first recurrence
Genital herpes, primary episode Acyclovir
Valacyclovir
Famciclovir
Oral
Oral
Oral
400 mg tid or 200 mg 5 times daily × 7–10 d
1 g bid × 7–10 d
250 mg tid × 7–10 d
Reduces duration of symptoms, genital
lesions, and virus shedding by 2, 4, and 7 d,
respectively
Genital herpes, recurrence Acyclovir
Valacyclovir
Famciclovir
Oral
Oral
Oral
800 mg tid × 2 d or 400 mg tid × 5 d
500 mg bid × 3 d or 1 g daily × 5 d
500 mg once, then 250 mg bid × 2 d
Reduces duration of symptoms, genital
lesions, and virus shedding by 1–2 d
Genital herpes suppression Acyclovir
Valacyclovir
Famciclovir
Oral
Oral
Oral
400 mg bid
250 mg bid
500 mg to 1 g daily
In patients with >6 recurrences per year,
reduces recurrence rates from 80–85%
to 25–30%, reduces virus shedding and
transmission
HSV encephalitis Acyclovir IV 10–15 mg/kg q8h × 14–21 d Reduces mortality and sequelae
HSV keratitis Acyclovir
Trifluridine
Vidarabine
Topical
Topical
Topical
3% ophthalmic ointment, 5 times daily
1% ophthalmic solution, 1 drop q2h when
awake (9 drops daily max)
3% ointment, ½-inch ribbon 5 times daily
Shortens duration of disease; acyclovir better
tolerated, especially with prolonged treatment
Mucocutaneous herpes in
immunocompromised patient
Acyclovir
Valacyclovir
Famciclovir
IV
Oral
Oral
5 mg/kg q8h × 7–14 d
500 mg to 1 g bid × 7–10 d
500 mg bid × 7–10 d
IV acyclovir reduces time to healing, duration
of pain, and duration of virus shedding
Varicella Acyclovir
Valacyclovir
Oral
Oral
20 mg/kg (800 mg max) 5 times daily × 5 d
20 mg/kg (1 g max) tid × 5 d
Has modest effect on symptoms, reduces
fever duration by 1 day
Zoster Acyclovir
Valacyclovir
Famciclovir
Oral
Oral
Oral
800 mg 5 times daily × 7 d
1 g tid × 7 d
500 mg tid × 7 d
Reduces time for last new lesion formation,
virus shedding, and pain duration
Varicella or zoster,
disseminated
Acyclovir IV 10 mg/kg q8h × 7 d Reduces time for last new lesion formation
and virus shedding; reduces cutaneous
dissemination
Cytomegalovirus disease Ganciclovir
Valganciclovir
Foscarnet
Cidofovir
IV
Oral
IV
IV
5 mg/kg q12h × 14–21 d, then 5 mg/kg daily
(maintenance dose)
900 mg bid × 14–21 d, then 90 mg daily
(maintenance dose)
60 mg/kg q8h × 14–21 d, then 90–120 mg daily
(maintenance dose)
5 mg/kg once weekly twice, then every other
week
Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia common
after 1 week
Levels and side effects similar to ganciclovir
Nephrotoxicity, electrolyte abnormalities; give
with additional saline
Nephrotoxicity; give with probenecid and
saline
Oral acyclovir reduces the duration of pain and other symptoms,
time to healing, and shedding in patients with their first episode of
genital herpes when treatment is begun within 6 days of infection.
Acyclovir, valacyclovir, and famciclovir are all effective for treatment
of primary and recurrent genital and orolabial herpes as well as for
suppressive therapy for these conditions. Topical acyclovir cream
reduces shedding and time to healing by 1–2 days if given within 1
day of symptom onset in persons with recurrent genital or orolabial
herpes. Oral acyclovir or valacyclovir reduces the severity of varicella
when given within 1 day of onset of the rash. Oral acyclovir, famciclovir, or valacyclovir shortens the duration of pain and rash associated with zoster if given within 3 days of onset. Oral valacyclovir is
more effective than oral acyclovir and is generally preferred since it
has better oral bioavailability and does not need to be given as frequently. Suppressive valacyclovir therapy for genital herpes reduces
transmission to uninfected partners by 50%. Intravenous acyclovir is used for herpes encephalitis and disseminated HSV or VZV
disease.
1462 PART 5 Infectious Diseases
CMV UL97 protein kinase or, less commonly, UL54 viral DNA polymerase can result in resistance to ganciclovir or valganciclovir. CMV
with mutations in protein kinase is usually sensitive to foscarnet and
cidofovir, while CMV with mutations in both protein kinase and DNA
polymerase is usually sensitive only to foscarnet. Mutations are more
common among persons who are highly immunocompromised and
who have been taking the drug for a long time. Resistant virus is treated
with foscarnet or cidofovir.
Ganciclovir and valganciclovir are used for treating severe CMV
infections in immunocompromised patients, including colitis, pneumonitis, retinitis, and encephalitis. Induction therapy, given two or
three times daily, is usually followed by less frequently administered
maintenance therapy. Oral valganciclovir has activity similar to that
of intravenous ganciclovir. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir are used for
prevention of CMV infection in transplant recipients when given either
preemptively (on the basis of viremia) or prophylactically. Ganciclovir
reduces developmental delay in infants with congenital CMV disease
involving the CNS and reduces hearing loss in infants with asymptomatic congenital CMV infection. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir are used
for treatment of HHV-6 encephalitis, HHV-8–associated Castleman
disease in patients with poorly controlled HIV infection, and severe
HSV or VZV disease when acyclovir is unavailable.
■ FOSCARNET
Foscarnet is a pyrophosphate analogue that directly inhibits herpesvirus DNA polymerases by blocking the pyrophosphate binding site in
the enzyme. Foscarnet does not require additional phosphorylation
(unlike acyclovir, cidofovir, or ganciclovir) in virus-infected cells for
its activity. This drug is approved for treatment of CMV retinitis and
mucocutaneous acyclovir-resistant HSV disease. It is also used to treat
ganciclovir-resistant CMV and acyclovir-resistant VZV. Foscarnet is
given intravenously and is excreted by the kidneys; dose adjustment
is required in renal insufficiency. Up to one-third of patients receiving
foscarnet develop nephrotoxicity with elevated levels of creatinine and
blood urea nitrogen, and proteinuria. Renal tubular acidosis and interstitial nephritis also have been reported. Renal insufficiency is more
common among persons who are dehydrated, given other nephrotoxic
drugs, or given high doses or rapid infusions of foscarnet. Administering IV saline before and after each foscarnet dose and giving the drug
over an adequate period can reduce nephrotoxicity. Renal insufficiency
is often reversible after treatment when the drug is stopped. Other side
effects include hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia, which can be associated with arrhythmias, paresthesias, and seizures. Other metabolic
abnormities include hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, or hyperphosphatemia. Foscarnet can also cause headache, fever, rash, diarrhea,
acute dystonia, tremors, hemorrhagic cystitis, genital ulcerations,
anemia, and abnormal liver function values. Mutations in CMV DNA
polymerase (UL54) or in HSV or VZV DNA polymerase can result
in resistance to foscarnet. CMV, HSV, and VZV can become resistant
to foscarnet; some strains of CMV are resistant to foscarnet, ganciclovir, and cidofovir; and HSV can become resistant to acyclovir and
foscarnet. Foscarnet is typically used to treat CMV retinitis, HHV-6
encephalitis, or drug-resistant severe CMV, HSV, or VZV infections
in immunocompromised patients. Topical foscarnet has been used to
treat acyclovir-resistant mucosal infections due to HSV.
■ CIDOFOVIR
Cidofovir is an analogue of deoxycytidine monophosphate and is
phosphorylated in cells to its active diphosphate form. The diphosphate form of cidofovir competes with deoxycytidine triphosphate for
incorporation into herpesvirus DNA. The drug inhibits replication
of all human herpesviruses as well as poxviruses, papillomaviruses,
polyomaviruses, and adenoviruses. Cidofovir is approved for treatment
of CMV retinitis in patients with AIDS; it is also used for treatment
of infections caused by CMV exhibiting ganciclovir resistance due to
mutations in UL97 protein kinase and of those caused by HSV or VZV
displaying mutations in thymidine kinase. Because cidofovir is excreted
by the kidneys, dose adjustment is required in renal insufficiency.
About one-fifth of patients receiving cidofovir develop nephrotoxicity,
and the drug is associated with metabolic acidosis and glucosuria.
Cidofovir therapy is preceded by at least 1 L of saline, and probenecid is given 3 h before, 2 h after, and 8 h after each dose to reduce
nephrotoxicity. An additional 1 L of saline is recommended during
treatment or immediately thereafter. About one-fourth of patients
receiving cidofovir develop neutropenia; additional side effects include
ocular hypotony, uveitis, iritis, headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea,
and rash. Mutations in CMV DNA polymerase (UL54) or HSV DNA
polymerase can result in resistance to cidofovir. Some strains of
CMV exhibiting ganciclovir resistance due to mutations in viral DNA
polymerase are resistant to cidofovir, whereas many CMV and HSV
strains exhibiting foscarnet resistance due to mutations in DNA polymerase may retain sensitivity to cidofovir. Cidofovir is typically used
to treat ganciclovir- and/or foscarnet-resistant severe CMV disease or
acyclovir- and/or foscarnet-resistant HSV disease in immunocompromised patients. Cidofovir has been used as preemptive therapy against
CMV infection in transplant recipients. It has also been used to treat
severe adenovirus infections, adenovirus or BK virus hemorrhagic cystitis, BK nephropathy, and severe molluscum contagiosum, although
controlled studies have not been performed. Topical cidofovir has
been used to treat acyclovir-resistant HSV mucosal infections and
anogenital warts.
■ LETERMOVIR
Letermovir is a dihydroquinazolin that inhibits the CMV DNA terminase complex (UL51, UL59), which is required for cleavage and packaging of CMV into nucleocapsids. The drug has no activity against other
human herpesviruses. Letermovir is approved for prophylaxis of CMV
infection and disease in adult CMV-seropositive recipients of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Letermovir is metabolized
by the liver and excreted in the feces; dose adjustment is not required if
the creatinine clearance rate (CrCl) is >10 mL/min. The dose of letermovir must be decreased in persons taking cyclosporine. Letermovir
therapy results in reduced levels of voriconazole and increased levels
of sirolimus, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and other drugs metabolized
by CYP2C8 or transported by OAT1B1/3. Side effects of letermovir
include headache, nausea, diarrhea, and peripheral edema. Letermovir
does not cause nephrotoxicity and is not myelosuppressive. Resistance
to letermovir occurs more frequently in vitro than resistance to ganciclovir or foscarnet, and clinically significant letermovir resistance due
to mutations in UL56 in patients with CMV disease has been reported;
resistance may be less common when the drug is used for prophylaxis in patients with low or undetectable CMV levels. When given to
CMV-seropositive patients, starting a median of 8 days after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and continuing for 14 weeks, letermovir
reduced the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection by 38%
compared with placebo. While anecdotes describe the use of letermovir
for treatment of CMV disease, resistance may develop quickly.
■ TRIFLURIDINE AND VIDARABINE
Trifluridine is a thymidine analogue that is incorporated into viral DNA
and inhibits its synthesis. Vidarabine is approved for topical therapy of
herpes keratitis and has also been used topically to treat acyclovir-resistant mucosal HSV infections. Trifluridine is active against acyclovir-resistant HSV, CMV, and vaccinia virus. Vidarabine is an adenosine analogue
that is incorporated into viral DNA and inhibits viral DNA polymerase.
Both trifluridine and vidarabine are used for topical therapy only.
■ INVESTIGATIONAL AND OTHER AGENTS
Brincidofovir is a phospholipid conjugate of cidofovir that is rapidly
taken up by cells and converted into cidofovir. It is active against
herpesviruses (including most strains of ganciclovir-resistant CMV),
poxviruses, adenovirus, and polyomaviruses. It does not cause nephrotoxicity and is not myelosuppressive. Diarrhea is the most common side
effect. The drug has been associated with intestinal toxicity and acute
graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract. The drug did not
meet its primary endpoints in trials for adenovirus disease or CMV
prophylaxis. Clinical trials of oral brincidofovir have been discontinued, although it is still being developed for treatment of smallpox.
1463CHAPTER 191 Antiviral Chemotherapy, Excluding Antiretroviral Drugs
It is available for patients with serious adenovirus or poxvirus infections as part of the expanded access program. An IV formulation,
which, it is hoped, will cause less gastrointestinal toxicity, is being
tested for adenovirus viremia.
Maribavir is a benzimidazole that inhibits the CMV UL97 protein
kinase and reduces the egress of viral particles from the nucleus. The
drug is active against most strains of ganciclovir- and foscarnet-resistant
CMV. In phase 3 trials, maribavir was unsuccessful in preventing CMV
disease in transplant recipients; it is currently being tested as therapy
for CMV infections refractory to treatment with other antiviral agents.
Pritelivir inhibits the helicase–primase complex required for replication of HSV. This drug has reduced viral shedding in patients with recurrent genital herpes and is being tested for use against acyclovir-resistant
HSV mucocutaneous infection. Pritelivir is available as an expanded
access drug for acyclovir-resistant HSV infection.
Amenamevir is a helicase–primase inhibitor under development for
HSV and VZV infections.
ANTIVIRAL DRUGS FOR RESPIRATORY
VIRUS INFECTIONS
■ INFLUENZA
Neuraminidase Inhibitors Oseltamivir, zanamivir, and peramivir
are neuraminidase inhibitors that inhibit cleavage of sialic acid, which
is required for the release of influenza virus from infected cells and its
spread to other cells.
Oseltamivir phosphate is an oral prodrug that is cleaved by esterases
in the liver, gastrointestinal tract, and blood to oseltamivir carboxylate,
the more active form. It is approved for treatment of uncomplicated
influenza A or B disease when given ≤48 h after symptom onset
and for prophylaxis of influenza A and B in persons ≥1 year of age
(Table 191-2). Oseltamivir is much less active against influenza B
than against influenza A. The drug is excreted by the kidneys, and the
dose is adjusted in renal insufficiency. The most common side effects
are nausea, abdominal pain, and vomiting. Although CNS side effects
have been reported, particularly in children, it is unclear whether they
are due to the drug or to influenza virus infection itself. Resistance to
oseltamivir can develop as a result of mutations in the viral neuraminidase or in the hemagglutinin. Oseltamivir-resistant virus has been
transmitted from person to person. Resistance has been reported in
~15% of healthy children and ~1% of adults; resistance is more common among immunocompromised persons.
Zanamivir is approved for treatment of uncomplicated influenza A
and B in adults and children ≥7 years of age who have had symptoms
for ≤2 days and for prophylaxis in persons ≥5 years of age. Because
zanamivir has poor oral bioavailability, it is given as a powder through
an inhaler. Thus, use of the drug can be difficult for young children
and some elderly patients. Inhalation of zanamivir may cause bronchospasm, particularly in persons with underlying lung disease; it is
not recommended for persons with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or other airway disease. Zanamivir is more active than
oseltamivir against influenza B. It is also active against some isolates of
influenza virus that are resistant to oseltamivir; resistance to zanamivir
is less common than that to oseltamivir.
Peramivir is approved for treating uncomplicated influenza in
patients ≥2 years of age who have had symptoms for ≤2 days. Because
of its long half-life, it is given as a single IV dose. Peramivir is highly
active against both influenza A and B. The drug is excreted by the kidneys, and the dose is adjusted in renal insufficiency. The most common
side effect is diarrhea. While peramivir-resistant virus is rare in healthy
persons, peramivir-resistant virus has been isolated from immunocompromised persons.
Oseltamivir, zanamivir, and peramivir are effective for treatment
of uncomplicated influenza A and B, including disease caused by
avian influenza viruses (e.g., H5N1, H7N9, and H9N2). None of the
neuraminidase inhibitors is approved by the FDA for complicated
influenza or for persons requiring hospitalization for the disease. While
not licensed for the treatment of persons with complicated disease,
inpatients, and pregnant women, oseltamivir is considered the drug of
choice in these settings. The efficacy of zanamivir is similar to that of
oseltamivir in hospitalized patients. Treatment is most effective when
begun within 2 days of symptom onset and should be started as early
as possible; such early treatment reduces symptoms by ~1 day in persons with uncomplicated disease. For persons with influenza requiring
hospitalization and with pneumonia, treatment with oseltamivir or
zanamivir is recommended even later. Treatment may reduce the risk
of complications and death in hospitalized patients with influenza.
Oseltamivir and zanamivir (but not peramivir) are approved for
prophylaxis of influenza, especially in institutions where outbreaks can
be severe, and for prophylaxis in persons who have been exposed to the
virus, are at high risk for disease complications, and have not recently
been vaccinated. The efficacy of oseltamivir and zanamivir for prophylaxis is estimated to be ~70–90%. For persons at institutions, prophylaxis is given for at least 2 weeks and for up to 1 week after outbreaks
resolve. For other high-risk persons, prophylaxis is given within 2 days
of exposure and continued for 1 week after exposure. Since neuraminidase inhibitors reduce virus release from cells, they should not be
given 2 days before or within 2 weeks after receipt of live, attenuated
influenza vaccine. Resistance has been reported during treatment with
oseltamivir or peramivir, especially in immunocompromised persons;
oseltamivir-resistant viruses are usually sensitive to zanamivir.
TABLE 191-2 Antiviral Drugs for Respiratory Virus Treatment and Prophylaxis in Adults
DISEASE DRUG ROUTE ADULT DOSE COMMENTS
Influenza A, B Oseltamivir Oral Treatment: 75 mg bid × 5 d
Prophylaxis: 75 mg/d
Shortens duration of symptoms by 1 d when given within 2 d of onset; reduces
complications; considered drug of choice for patients with complications of
influenza
Influenza A, B Zanamivir Inhaled Treatment: 10 mg bid × 5 d
Prophylaxis: 10 mg/d
Shortens duration of symptoms by 1–2 d when given within 2 d of onset;
requires patient training for use; can cause bronchospasm; not recommended
for persons with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Influenza A, B Peramivir IV 600 mg once Shortens duration of symptoms by 1–2 d when given within 2 d of onset
Influenza A, B Baloxavir Oral 40 mg once; if >80 kg, 80 mg
once
Shortens duration of symptoms by 1 d when given within 2 d of onset; active
against virus resistant to neuraminidase inhibitors
Influenza A Amantadine Oral Treatment: 100 mg bid × 5 d
Prophylaxis: 200 mg/d
Most influenza virus strains are resistant; use only if virus is known
to be sensitive.
Influenza A Rimantadine Oral Treatment: 100 mg bid × 5 d
Prophylaxis: 200 mg/d
Most influenza virus strains are resistant; use only if virus is known
to be sensitive.
Respiratory
syncytial virus
Ribavirin Inhaled Aerosol from reservoir
containing 20 mg/mL for
12−18 h/d × 3–6 d
Reduces severity of symptoms in hospitalized infants with lower respiratory
tract disease; anecdotal reports of reduced progression to lower respiratory
tract disease and mortality in stem cell transplant patients
SARS-CoV-2 Remdesivir IV 200 mg on day 1, then 100 mg
qd × 4 d
Reduces duration of hospitalization in some studies. Duration of treatment
extended up to 10 days if no improvement.
1464 PART 5 Infectious Diseases
Baloxavir Baloxavir inhibits the cap-dependent endonuclease that
is important in initiating synthesis of influenza virus mRNA. This drug
is approved by the FDA as a single oral dose for postexposure prophylaxis of influenza and for treatment of uncomplicated influenza in
persons ≥12 years of age who have had symptoms for ≤48 h. Baloxavir
inhibits influenza A and B viruses, including avian strains and strains
that are resistant to neuraminidase inhibitors. The drug’s efficacy is
similar to that of the neuraminidase inhibitors in persons with uncomplicated influenza and reduces symptoms by ~1 day. In addition,
baloxavir exhibits efficacy similar to that of oseltamivir for reducing
symptoms in high-risk patients. However, its effectiveness in patients
hospitalized with complications of influenza is unknown. Reduced
sensitivity of influenza virus to baloxavir has been associated with
mutations in the viral polymerase acidic protein after one dose. The
incidences of nausea and vomiting are lower with baloxavir than with
oseltamivir. Levels of the drug are lower if it is taken with dairy products, polyvalent cation-containing laxatives or antacids, or oral supplements containing calcium, iron, magnesium, selenium, or zinc. Since
baloxavir reduces virus replication, it should not be given 2 days before
or within 2 weeks after receipt of live, attenuated influenza vaccine.
Adamantanes Amantadine and rimantadine inhibit the influenza
virus’s M2 protein and its uncoating and membrane fusion. While these
drugs are active against influenza A, resistance is widespread and can
develop rapidly; thus, the adamantanes are not recommended as treatment or prophylaxis for influenza unless the virus is known to be sensitive.
■ RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS
Ribavirin Ribavirin is an analogue of guanosine and inhibits replication of numerous RNA and DNA viruses. The drug inhibits viral
RNA synthesis and capping of viral mRNA and in some cases increases
the viral RNA mutation rate to lethal levels for some viruses. Ribavirin
inhibits replication of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza virus,
parainfluenza virus, and many other RNA viruses in vitro. While the
drug has been used to treat numerous viral infections, including Lassa
fever and hepatitis E, it is approved by the FDA only for use against RSV
and as a component of combination therapy for hepatitis C. Aerosolized
ribavirin is approved for treatment of hospitalized infants and young
children with severe lower respiratory tract infections due to RSV; it
is given for 18 h per day and is most effective when used early in the
course of these severe infections. Ribavirin is given in a generator that
yields an aerosol of particles small enough to reach the lower respiratory tract; the level of systemic absorption is low. The aerosolized form
of the drug can induce bronchospasm, sudden deterioration of respiratory function (especially in infants), and rash and can precipitate in
ventilators, interfering with their function. Ribavirin is mutagenic and
teratogenic in animals; accordingly, it is not recommended for use in
pregnant women, and the exposure of health care workers should be
minimized with personal protective equipment. In early studies, ribavirin reduced the shedding of RSV and the severity of symptoms in hospitalized infants with lower respiratory tract disease who were not on
mechanical ventilation, the duration of oxygen supplementation, and
the duration of time on mechanical ventilation in infants. More recent
analyses of the literature suggest that the efficacy of the drug in these
settings is much less certain, and the drug is not recommended for routine use by the American Academy of Pediatrics. In retrospective studies, ribavirin has been reported to reduce the risk of progression of RSV
from upper to lower respiratory tract disease in stem cell transplant
recipients and to reduce mortality rates in these patients. In a retrospective study, the outcome of treatment with oral ribavirin was similar to that
obtained with the aerosolized drug in hematopoietic stem cell transplant
recipients with RSV disease. Ribavirin has not been shown to affect the
clinical course of patients with parainfluenza and is not recommended
for their treatment. Ribavirin costs more than $25,000 per day.
Palivizumab Palivizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to RSV
F protein, is approved for prevention of lower respiratory tract disease
due to RSV in pediatric patients at high risk of RSV disease, including
premature infants and children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
■ SARS-COV-2 (SEE CHAP. 199)
Remdesivir is converted in cells to an adenosine triphosphate analogue
that inhibits the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of several viruses.
The drug is approved by the FDA for treatment of persons ≥12 years of
age with SARS-CoV-2 requiring hospitalization; it shortens the duration of hospitalization in persons with lower respiratory tract disease.
While the results of studies with the drug vary, it is recommended by
the National Institutes of Health for patients with SARS-CoV-2 who
require supplemental oxygen while hospitalized. The drug is given
IV and is not recommended in persons with a GFR <30 mL/min.
Serum transaminase elevations have been reported in healthy persons
receiving remdesivir, and liver enzymes should be monitored before
and during treatment. Chloroquine inhibits the activity of remdesivir
in vitro; hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine phosphate should not be
given with remdesivir.
■ INVESTIGATIONAL AGENTS FOR RESPIRATORY
VIRUS INFECTIONS
Favipiravir (T705) inhibits viral RNA polymerases and is active against
influenza and other RNA viruses. It is approved for treatment of
emerging influenza viruses in Japan. Presatovir is an RSV fusion inhibitor that was ineffective in two trials of RSV disease. DAS181 (Fludase)
is a sialidase that cleaves sialic acid, a receptor for influenza A and B
and parainfluenza viruses; it did not improve the clinical outcomes of
patients with influenza, but in case reports transplant recipients with
parainfluenza have improved clinically with the drug. Laninamivir
octanoate inhibits the neuraminidase of influenza A and B viruses
and is approved for treating influenza in Japan. RSV604 interacts with
the RSV nucleocapsid and is undergoing phase 2 studies in transplant
recipients.
Molnupiravir is an oral ribonucleoside analog that inhibits replication of SARS-CoV-2. The drug reduced the risk of hospitalization
or death in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 by ~50% in a
phase 3 clinical trial. AT-527 is an oral nucleotide prodrug that reduced
SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in a
phase 2 clinical trial. PF-07321332 is an oral SARS-CoV-2 protease
inhibitor that is being tested in combination with low dose ritonavir in
a phase 2/3 clinical trial for prevention of COVID-19 infection.
ANTIVIRAL DRUGS FOR HUMAN
PAPILLOMAVIRUS AND POXVIRUS
INFECTIONS
Interferon α (IFN-α) inhibits replication of many RNA and DNA
viruses in vitro. IFN-α is approved by the FDA for intralesional treatment of external anogenital warts caused by human papillomavirus
(HPV). It is effective in resolving lesions in ~50% of cases, with a
recurrence rate of ~25%.
Imiquimod is a toll-like receptor 7 agonist that induces production
of IFN-α and other cytokines. It is approved as a topical cream for
treatment of external genital and perianal warts caused by HPV in
persons ≥12 years of age. This drug is effective in resolving lesions in
~40% of cases.
Tecovirimat is approved by the FDA for treatment of smallpox and
inhibits replication of monkeypox and vaccinia viruses. Resistance to
tecovirimat developed in a person treated with the drug for progressive
vaccinia.
INVESTIGATIONAL ANTIVIRAL
DRUGS FOR PICORNAVIRUS
Pocapavir inhibits picornaviruses by inhibiting virus uncoating and is
being developed to reduce poliovirus shedding; resistance to the drug
develops rapidly.
ANTIVIRAL DRUGS FOR HEPATITIS B
VIRUS INFECTION
Eight drugs of two classes are approved for the treatment of chronic
HBV infection in the United States. One class, the nucleos(t)ide
analogues, act as chain-terminating competitive inhibitors of HBV
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع