ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Central venous access devices (CVADs) have been commonly employed during various courses of anticancer treatment. Currently, there are a few types of clinically available CVADs, which are associated with short-term and long-term complications. However, little is known about the complication rates when CVADs are used only in palliative care settings. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all the published literature to evaluate the complication rates of CVADs in this clinical setting. (2) Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to identify publications from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and trial registries. Publications reporting the complication rates of PICCs, central lines, and PORTs in palliative settings for terminally ill cancer patients were included, while those on the use of systemic anticancer therapy and peripheral venous catheters were excluded. The outcome measures included overall complication rate, rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and rate of thromboembolism (TE). This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023404489). (3) Results: Five publications with 327 patients were analyzed, including four studies on PICCs and one study on central lines. No studies on PORTs were eligible for analysis. The overall complication rate for PICCs (pooled estimate 7.02%, 95% CI 0.27-19.10) was higher than that for central lines (1.44%, 95% CI 0.30-4.14, p = 0.002). The risk of CRBSI with PICCs (2.03%, 95% CI 0.00-9.62) was also higher than that with central lines (0.96%, 95% CI 0.12-3.41, p = 0.046). PICCs also had a trend of a higher risk of TE (2.10%, 95% CI 0.00-12.22) compared to central lines (0.48%, 95% CI 0.01-2.64, p = 0.061). (4) Conclusions: PICCs for palliative cancer care were found to have greater complications than central lines. This might aid in the formulation of future recommendation guidelines on the choice of CVAD in this setting.

PMID:37835406 | PMC:PMC10571956 | DOI:10.3390/cancers15194712

00:19

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban to Prevent Recurrences of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer: A Real-Life Experience with a Focus on Female Patients

J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 9;12(19):6427. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196427.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The way in which to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an unmet clinical need in cancer patients. International guidelines only provide conditional recommendations and do not specify which anticoagulant and dose should be used. In the last 2 years, we have been using low-dose rivaroxaban to prevent VTE recurrences in cancer patients. The results of this real-life experience are presented in this study.

METHODS: All patients had cancer and had previously completed a cycle of at least six months of full-dose anticoagulation for the treatment of a VTE index event, before receiving a prescription of low-dose rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) for secondary prevention of VTE. Effectiveness and safety of this therapeutic regimen were evaluated in terms of VTE recurrences, major bleedings (MB), and clinically relevant non-major bleedings (CRNMB).

RESULTS: The analysis included 106 cancer patients. Their median age was 60 years (IQR 50-69). Metastatic cancer was present in 87 patients (82.1%). Six patients (5.7%) had brain metastases. Over a median follow-up time of 333 days (IQR 156-484), the incidence of VTE recurrences was 3.8% (95%CI 1.0-9.4), with a recurrence rate of 4.0 per 100 person-years (95%CI 1.1-10.2). We observed no MB (0.0%) and three CRNMB (2.8%) (95%CI 0.6-8.1).

CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose rivaroxaban is potentially effective and safe in cancer patients that require prevention of recurrent VTE. Large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

PMID:37835070 | PMC:PMC10573527 | DOI:10.3390/jcm12196427

00:19

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Inhibition of Factor XI: A New Era in the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients?

Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 22;24(19):14433. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914433.

ABSTRACT

Direct oral anticoagulants against activated factor X and thrombin were the last milestone in thrombosis treatment. Step by step, they replaced antivitamin K and heparins in most of their therapeutic indications. As effective as the previous anticoagulant, the decreased but persistent risk of bleeding while using direct oral anticoagulants has created space for new therapeutics aiming to provide the same efficacy with better safety. On this basis, drug targeting factor XI emerged as an option. In particular, cancer patients might be one of the populations that will most benefit from this technical advance. In this review, after a brief presentation of the different factor IX inhibitors, we explore the potential benefit of this new treatment for cancer patients.

PMID:37833881 | PMC:PMC10572808 | DOI:10.3390/ijms241914433

00:19

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Enoxaparin for the long-term therapy of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal insufficiency

Thromb Haemost. 2023 Oct 13. doi: 10.1055/a-2191-7510. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal therapy of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients with renal insufficiency (RI) is unknown. Current guidelines recommend to use low-molecular-weight heparin over direct oral anticoagulants to treat VTE in cancer patients at high-risk for bleeding.

METHODS: We used the RIETE registry to compare the 6-month incidence rates of: 1) VTE recurrences vs. major bleeding; and 2) fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) vs. fatal bleeding in 3 subgroups (those with mild, moderate, or severe RI) of cancer patients receiving enoxaparin monotherapy.

RESULTS: From January 2009 through June 2022, 2,844 patients with RI received enoxaparin for ≥6 months: 1,432 (50%) had mild, 1,168 (41%) moderate, and 244 (8.6%) had severe RI. Overall, 68%, 62% and 12% respectively, received the recommended doses. Among patients with mild RI, the rates of VTE recurrences vs. major bleeding (4.6% vs. 5.4%) and fatal PE vs. fatal bleeding (1.3% vs. 1.2%) were similar. Among patients with moderate RI, VTE recurrences were half as common as major bleeding (3.1% vs. 6.3%), but fatal PE and fatal bleeding were close (1.8% vs. 1.2%). Among patients with severe RI, VTE recurrences were 3-fold less common than major bleeding (4.1% vs. 13%), but fatal PE was 3-fold more frequent than fatal bleeding (2.5% vs. 0.8%). During the first 10 days, fatal PE was 5-fold more common than fatal bleeding (2.1% vs. 0.4%).

CONCLUSIONS: Among cancer patients with severe RI, fatal PE was 5-fold more common than fatal bleeding. The recommended doses of enoxaparin in these patients should be revisited.

PMID:37832588 | DOI:10.1055/a-2191-7510

00:19

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Implementation of routine venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer

Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Oct 11;178:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.001. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy before and after implementing routine thromboprophylaxis.

METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental pre-post study evaluating the VTE rate in patients with ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy following a quality improvement initiative of routine thromboprophylaxis within a single healthcare system that started in January 2017. Patients were excluded if VTE was diagnosed before initiating chemotherapy. Patient factors and perioperative variables of interest were investigated for their association with VTE through univariate and multivariate models.

RESULTS: Of the 136 patients in the pre-implementation group, 3.7% (n = 5) received thromboprophylaxis. Of the 154 patients in the post-implementation group, 65.6% (n = 101) received thromboprophylaxis. Provider compliance varied from 51% in 2019 to 79.3% in 2021. The overall rate of VTE, from the start of chemotherapy to the end of treatment, was 21.3% (n = 29) pre- and 8.4% (n = 13) in the post-implementation group (p < 0.01). There was no difference in major bleeding events between groups (0% vs. 0.68%, p = 0.63). On univariate analysis, thromboprophylaxis (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-0.52) and post-implementation period (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.17-0.69) were associated with a decreased risk of any VTE during primary treatment. On multivariate analysis, only thromboprophylaxis remained significantly associated with reduced VTE rates (aOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-0.53).

CONCLUSION: Routine thromboprophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with reduced risk of VTE throughout primary treatment and is not associated with increased bleeding events.

PMID:37832182 | DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.001

00:19

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Risk of Thrombosis and Bleeding in Gynecologic Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct 10:S0002-9378(23)00735-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.006. Online ahead of print.