ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide procedure-specific estimates of the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding, in the absence of thromboprophylaxis, following gynecologic cancer surgery.

DATA SOURCES: We conducted comprehensive searches on Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for observational studies. We also reviewed reference lists of eligible studies and review articles. We performed separate searches for randomized trials addressing effects of thromboprophylaxis and conducted a web-based survey on thromboprophylaxis practice.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies enrolling ≥50 adult patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery procedures reporting absolute incidence for at least one of the following: symptomatic pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic VTE, bleeding requiring reintervention (including re-exploration and angioembolization), bleeding leading to transfusion or post-operative hemoglobin <70

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility, performed data extraction, and evaluated risk of bias of eligible articles. We adjusted the reported estimates for thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up and used the median value from studies to determine cumulative incidence at 4 weeks post-surgery stratified by patient VTE risk factors, and used the GRADE approach to rate evidence certainty.

RESULTS: We included 188 studies (398,167 patients) reporting on 37 gynecologic cancer surgery procedures. The evidence certainty was generally low to very low. Median symptomatic VTE risk (in the absence of prophylaxis) was <1%2.0% in 13 of 37 (35%). The risks of VTE varied from 0.1% in low VTE risk patients undergoing cervical conization to 33.5% in high VTE risk patients undergoing pelvic exenteration. Estimates of bleeding requiring reintervention varied from <0.1%<1%

CONCLUSIONS: VTE reduction with thromboprophylaxis likely outweighs increase in bleeding requiring reintervention in many gynecologic cancer procedures (e.g., open surgery for ovarian cancer and pelvic exenteration). In some procedures (e.g., laparoscopic total hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy), thromboembolism and bleeding risks are similar, and decisions depend on individual risk prediction and values and preferences regarding VTE and bleeding.

PMID:37827272 | DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.006

➖ Sent by @TheFeedReaderBot ➖

04:20

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Accuracy of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator for Predicting Postoperative Complications in Gastric Cancer Following Open Gastrectomy

Am Surg. 2023 Oct 12:31348231206581. doi: 10.1177/00031348231206581. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The prediction of complications before gastric surgery is of utmost importance in shared decision making and proper counseling of the patient in order to minimize postoperative complications. Our aim was to evaluate the predictive validity of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) risk calculator in gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy.

METHODS: Preoperative assessment data of 432 patients were retrospectively reviewed and manually entered into the calculator. The accuracy of the calculator was evaluated using Pearson's chi-squared test, C-statistic, Brier score, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

RESULTS: The lowest Brier scores were observed in urinary tract infection, renal failure, venous thromboembolism, pneumonia, and cardiac complications. Best results were obtained for predicting sepsis, discharge to rehabilitation facility, and death (low Brier scores, C-statistic >.7, and Hosmer-Lemeshow P > .05).

CONCLUSION: The calculator had a strong performance in predicting sepsis, discharge to the rehabilitation facility, and death. However, it performed poor in predicting the most commonly observed events (any or serious complication and surgical site infection).

PMID:37823864 | DOI:10.1177/00031348231206581

➖ Sent by @TheFeedReaderBot ➖

04:20

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 Aug 20;7(7):102173. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102173. eCollection 2023 Oct.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidenced-based interventions have been developed to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer, including VTE-risk assessment for all patients and targeted primary thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients. Despite supportive evidence and recommendations, oncologists rarely assess VTE risk or provide primary prophylaxis. Our previous work identified barriers and facilitators to using VTE prevention interventions in oncology practice.

OBJECTIVES: To identify potential strategies that address the identified barriers and leverage facilitators to achieve successful implementation of evidence-based interventions for VTE prevention in oncology practice.

METHODS: We used the Implementation Research Logic Model, an implementation science framework, to map the relationships among barriers and facilitators, feasible and effective implementation strategies, and implementation and clinical outcomes that will be used to evaluate the implementation strategies.

RESULTS: We identified 12 discrete implementation strategies (eg, conducting clinician education and training and staged implementation scale-up) that address barriers and leverage facilitators through their mechanisms of action (eg, increased clinician awareness of evidence and targeting the highest effectiveness). We identified key implementation (eg, penetration, adoption, acceptability, fidelity, appropriateness, and sustainability), system (eg, integration of VTE-risk assessment into clinical workflow), and clinical (eg, lower VTE rates) outcomes targeted by the selected strategies.

CONCLUSION: Using the Implementation Research Logic Model framework and building on our knowledge of barriers and facilitators, we identified implementation strategies and important outcomes to evaluate these strategies. We will use these results to test and measure the strategies to improve the uptake of evidence-based recommendations for VTE prevention in oncology practice.

PMID:37822563 | PMC:PMC10562910 | DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102173

➖ Sent by @TheFeedReaderBot ➖

04:20

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor is associated with risk of venous thromboembolism and all-cause mortality in patients with cancer

Haematologica. 2023 Oct 12. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283581. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with cancer. Data on the role of natural inhibitors of coagulation for occurrence of cancerassociated VTE are limited, thus, we investigated the association of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) with risk of VTE and all-cause mortality in patients with cancer. Total TFPI antigen levels were measured with a commercially available ELISA in patients included in the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study, a prospective observational cohort study with the primary outcome VTE. Competing risk analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to explore the association of TFPI levels with VTE and all-cause mortality. TFPI was analyzed in 898 patients (median age: 62 years [interquartile range, IQR: 53-68]; 407 [45%] women). Sixtyseven patients developed VTE and 387 died (24-month cumulative risk: 7.5% and 42.1%, respectively). Patients had median TFPI levels at study inclusion of 56.4ng/mL (IQR: 45.7-70.0), with highest levels in tumor types known to have a high risk of VTE (gastroesophageal-, pancreatic and brain-cancer: 62.0ng/mL [IQR: 52.0-75.0]). In multivariable analysis adjusting for age, sex, cancer type and stage, TFPI levels were associated with VTE risk (SHR per doubling: 1.63, 95%CI: 1.03-2.57). When patients with high and intermediate/low VTE risk were analyzed separately, the association remained independently associated in the high risk group only (SHR: 2.63, 95%CI: 1.40-4.94). TFPI levels were independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 2.36, 95%CI: 1.85-3.00). In cancer patients increased TFPI levels are associated with VTE risk, specifically in patients with high risk tumor types, and with all-cause mortality.

PMID:37822244 | DOI:10.3324/haematol.2023.283581

➖ Sent by @TheFeedReaderBot ➖

04:21

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Risk factors for bleeding in cancer patients treated with conventional dose followed by low dose apixaban for venous thromboembolism

Thromb Haemost. 2023 Oct 10. doi: 10.1055/a-2188-8773. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Incidence of and risk factors for bleeding in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) treated with apixaban are poorly described.

METHODS: We analyzed data from the prospective CAP study where 298 cancer patients with any type of VTE received 5 mg apixaban twice daily for 6 months, and then 2.5 mg apixaban twice daily for 30 months. For most analyses major bleedings and clinically relevant non-major bleedings were merged to "clinically relevant bleedings". Risk factors were estimated by odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS: The incidence of clinically relevant bleedings was 38% per person year during the first 6 months of treatment, 21% per person year from 7 to 12 months, and between 4% and 8% per person year from 13 to 36 months. Clinically relevant bleedings were associated with age above 74 years (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0-4.1), BMI below 21.7 (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8), and hemoglobin at baseline below 10.5 for females (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.3) and 11.1 for males (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.4) during the first 6 months. Gastrointestinal (GI) or urogenital cancer were not associated with clinically relevant bleedings compared with other cancers. Among patients with luminal GI-cancer, non-resected cancer had increased risk of bleeding (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.0-11.6) compared with resected GI-cancer.

CONCLUSION: It was very few bleedings while patients were on low-dose apixaban. Factors associated with bleeding in patients treated with full-dose apixaban were high age, low BMI, and low hemoglobin, and probably non-resected luminal GI-cancer.

PMID:37816388 | DOI:10.1055/a-2188-8773

➖ Sent by @TheFeedReaderBot ➖

04:21

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Persistent underuse of extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer operations

J Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct 6. doi: 10.1002/jso.27473. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for high-risk populations undergoing major abdominal cancer operations. Few studies have evaluated extended VTE prophylaxis in the Medicare population who are at higher risk due to age.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using a 20% random sample of Medicare claims, 2012-2017. Patients ≥65 years with an abdominal cancer undergoing resection were included. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving new extended VTE prophylaxis prescriptions at discharge. Secondary outcomes included postdischarge VTE and hemorrhagic events.

RESULTS: The study included 72 983 patients with a mean age of 75. Overall, 8.9% of patients received extended VTE prophylaxis. This proportion increased (7.2% in 2012, 10.6% in 2017; p < 0.001). Incidence of postdischarge hemorrhagic events was 1.0% in patients receiving extended VTE prophylaxis and 0.8% in those who did not. The incidence of postdischarge VTE events was 5.2% in patients receiving extended VTE prophylaxis and 2.4% in those who did not.

CONCLUSION: Adherence to guideline-recommended extended VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal cancer operations is low. The higher rate of VTE in the prophylaxis group may suggest we captured some therapeutic anticoagulation, which would mean the actual rate of thromboprophylaxis is lower than reported herein.

PMID:37800390 | DOI:10.1002/jso.27473

➖ Sent by @TheFeedReaderBot ➖

04:21

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Are Antibiotics the New Appendectomy?

Cureus. 2023 Sep 1;15(9):e44506. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44506. eCollection 2023 Sep.