2434 PART 10 Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
of refluxed acid. Dysphagia may also be manifest but is generally mild
and alleviated by eating in an upright position and using liquids to
facilitate solid emptying.
■ DERMATOLOGIC DISEASES
A host of dermatologic disorders (lichen planus, pemphigus vulgaris,
bullous pemphigoid, cicatricial pemphigoid, Behçet’s syndrome, and
epidermolysis bullosa) can affect the oropharynx and esophagus,
particularly the proximal esophagus, with blisters, bullae, ulceration,
webs, and strictures. Topical or systemic anti-inflammatory therapy
is effective for mucosal healing. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and graftversus-host disease can also involve the esophagus. Esophageal dilation
may be necessary to treat strictures.
■ FURTHER READING
Furuta GT, Katzka DA: Eosinophilic esophagitis. N Engl J Med
373:1640, 2015.
Hirano I et al: American Gastroenterological Institute and the joint
task force on allergy-immunology practice parameters clinical guidelines for the management of eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology 158:1776, 2020.
Kahrilas PJ, Boeckxstaens G: The spectrum of achalasia: Lessons
from studies of pathophysiology and high-resolution manometry.
Gastroenterology 145:954, 2013.
Kahrilas PJ et al: American Gastroenterological Association Institute
technical review on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 135:1392, 2008.
Katzka DA et al: Phenotypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease:
where Rome, Lyon, and Montreal meet. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
18:767, 2020.
Pandolfino JE, Gawron AJ: Achalasia: A systematic review. JAMA
313:1841, 2015.
Shaheen NJ et al: Diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus.
Am J Gastroenterol 111:30, 2016.
Spechler SJ, Souza RF: Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med 371:836,
2014.
PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE
A peptic ulcer is defined as disruption of the mucosal integrity of the
stomach and/or duodenum leading to a local defect or excavation due
to active inflammation. Although burning epigastric pain exacerbated
by fasting and improved with meals is a symptom complex associated
with peptic ulcer disease (PUD), it is now clear that >90% patients with
this symptom complex (dyspepsia) do not have ulcers and that the
majority of patients with peptic ulcers may be asymptomatic. Ulcers
occur within the stomach and/or duodenum and are often chronic in
nature. Acid peptic disorders are very common in the United States,
with 4 million individuals (new cases and recurrences) affected per
year. Lifetime overall prevalence of PUD in the United States is ~8.4%
with a slightly higher prevalence in men. PUD significantly affects
quality of life by impairing overall patient well-being and contributing
substantially to work absenteeism. Moreover, an estimated 15,000
deaths per year occur as a consequence of complicated PUD. The
financial impact of these common disorders has been substantial,
with an estimated burden on direct and indirect health care costs
of ~$6 billion per year in the United States, with $3 billion spent on
hospitalizations, $2 billion on physician office visits, and $1 billion in
decreased productivity and days lost from work.
324 Peptic Ulcer Disease
and Related Disorders
John Del Valle
Gastric pit
(foveolus)
Isthmus
Neck
Oxyntic Gland
Base
(fundus)
Surface mucous cells
Mucous neck cells
Parietal cells
Endocrine cell
Chief cells
FIGURE 324-1 Diagrammatic representation of the oxyntic gastric gland.
(Reproduced with permission from S Ito, RJ Winchester: The Fine Structure of the
Gastric Mucosa in the Bat. J Cell Biol 16:541, 1963.)
■ GASTRIC PHYSIOLOGY
Gastric Anatomy The gastric epithelial lining consists of rugae
that contain microscopic gastric pits, each branching into four or
five gastric glands made up of highly specialized epithelial cells. The
makeup of gastric glands varies with their anatomic location. Glands
within the gastric cardia comprise <5% of the gastric gland area and
contain mucous and endocrine cells. The 75% of gastric glands are
found within the oxyntic mucosa and contain mucous neck, parietal,
chief, endocrine, enterochromaffin, and enterochromaffin-like (ECL)
cells (Fig. 324-1). Highly specialized tuft cells are located in the neck
region of the gastric gland. These specialized cells are thought to sample luminal contents, which in turn may be important in regulating
gastric acid secretion. Pyloric glands contain mucous and endocrine
cells (including gastrin cells) and are found in the antrum.
The parietal cell, also known as the oxyntic cell, is usually found in the
neck or isthmus or in the oxyntic gland. The resting, or unstimulated,
parietal cell has prominent cytoplasmic tubulovesicles and intracellular
canaliculi containing short microvilli along its apical surface (Fig. 324-2).
H+
,K+
-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) is expressed in the tubulovesicle
membrane; upon cell stimulation, this membrane, along with apical membranes, transforms into a dense network of apical intracellular canaliculi
containing long microvilli. Acid secretion, a process requiring high energy,
occurs at the apical canalicular surface. Numerous mitochondria (30–40%
of total cell volume) generate the energy required for secretion.
Gastroduodenal Mucosal Defense The gastric epithelium is
under constant assault by a series of endogenous noxious factors,
including hydrochloric acid (HCl), pepsinogen/pepsin, and bile salts.
In addition, a steady flow of exogenous substances such as medications,
alcohol, and bacteria encounter the gastric mucosa. A highly intricate
biologic system is in place to provide defense from mucosal injury and
to repair any injury that may occur.
The mucosal defense system can be envisioned as a three-level barrier,
composed of preepithelial, epithelial, and subepithelial elements
2435Peptic Ulcer Disease and Related Disorders CHAPTER 324
(Fig. 324-3). The first line of defense is a mucus-bicarbonate-phospholipid
layer, which serves as a physicochemical barrier to multiple molecules,
including hydrogen ions. Mucus is secreted in a regulated fashion by
gastroduodenal surface epithelial cells. It consists primarily of water
(95%) and a mixture of phospholipids and glycoproteins (mucin). The
mucous gel functions as a nonstirred water layer impeding diffusion of
ions and molecules such as pepsin. Bicarbonate, secreted in a regulated
manner by surface epithelial cells of the gastroduodenal mucosa into
the mucous gel, forms a pH gradient ranging from 1 to 2 at the gastric
luminal surface and reaching 6–7 along the epithelial cell surface.
Surface epithelial cells provide the next line of defense through
several factors, including mucus production, epithelial cell ionic transporters that maintain intracellular pH and bicarbonate production,
and intracellular tight junctions. Surface epithelial cells generate heat
shock proteins that prevent protein denaturation and protect cells from
certain factors such as increased temperature, cytotoxic agents, or oxidative stress. Epithelial cells also generate trefoil factor family peptides
and cathelicidins, which also play a role in surface cell protection and
regeneration. If the preepithelial barrier is breached, gastric epithelial cells bordering a site of injury can migrate to restore a damaged
region (restitution). This process occurs independent of cell division
and requires uninterrupted blood flow and an alkaline pH in the surrounding environment. Several growth factors, including epidermal
growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor (TGF) α, and basic
fibroblast growth factor (FGF), modulate the process of restitution.
Larger defects that are not effectively repaired by restitution require cell
proliferation. Epithelial cell regeneration is regulated by prostaglandins
and growth factors such as EGF and TGF-α. In tandem with epithelial
cell renewal, formation of new vessels (angiogenesis) within the injured
microvascular bed occurs. Both FGF and vascular endothelial growth
factor (VEGF) are important in regulating angiogenesis in the gastric
mucosa. In addition, the gastric peptide gastrin (see below) has been
recently found to stimulate cell proliferation, migration, invasion,
angiogenesis, and autophagy. Finally, gastric parietal cells (see below)
express sonic hedgehog, a family of proteins important in regulating
cell lineage in multiple organs. This latter finding suggests that parietal
cells may also have the ability to regulate gastric stem cells.
An elaborate microvascular system within the gastric submucosal layer is the key component of the subepithelial defense/repair
system, providing HCO3
−, which neutralizes the acid generated by
the parietal cell. Moreover, this microcirculatory bed provides an
adequate supply of micronutrients and oxygen while removing toxic
metabolic by-products. Several locally produced factors including
nitric oxide (NO) (see below), hydrogen sulfide, and prostacyclin contribute to the vascular protective pathway through vasodilation of the
microcirculation.
Prostaglandins play a central role in gastric epithelial defense/
repair (Fig. 324-4). The gastric mucosa contains abundant levels of
prostaglandins that regulate the release of mucosal bicarbonate and
mucus, inhibit parietal cell secretion, and are important in maintaining
Resting Stimulated
Canaliculus HCl
H3O+
Ca
– cAMP
KCl
KCl
H+,K+–ATPase
Gastrin
Active
pump
Tubulovesicles
ACh Histamine
Active
pump
FIGURE 324-2 Gastric parietal cell undergoing transformation after secretagoguemediated stimulation. cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate. (Reproduced with
permission from SJ Hersey, G Sachs: Gastric acid secretion. Am Physiol Soc 75:155, 1995.)
mucosal blood flow and epithelial cell restitution. Prostaglandins are
derived from esterified arachidonic acid, which is formed from phospholipids (cell membrane) by the action of phospholipase A2
. A key
enzyme that controls the rate-limiting step in prostaglandin synthesis
is cyclooxygenase (COX), which is present in two isoforms (COX-1,
COX-2), each having distinct characteristics regarding structure, tissue
distribution, and expression. COX-1 is expressed in a host of tissues,
including the stomach, platelets, kidneys, and endothelial cells. This
isoform is expressed in a constitutive manner and plays an important
role in maintaining the integrity of renal function, platelet aggregation,
and gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal integrity. In contrast, the expression
of COX-2 is inducible by inflammatory stimuli, and it is expressed in
macrophages, leukocytes, fibroblasts, and synovial cells. The beneficial
effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on tissue
inflammation are due to inhibition of COX-2; the toxicity of these
drugs (e.g., GI mucosal ulceration and renal dysfunction) is related to
inhibition of the COX-1 isoform. The highly COX-2–selective NSAIDs
have the potential to provide the beneficial effect of decreasing tissue
inflammation while minimizing toxicity in the GI tract. Selective
COX-2 inhibitors have had adverse effects on the cardiovascular (CV)
system, leading to increased risk of myocardial infarction. Therefore,
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has removed two of
these agents (valdecoxib and rofecoxib) from the market (see below).
NO is important in the maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity.
The key enzyme NO synthase is constitutively expressed in the mucosa
and contributes to cytoprotection by stimulating gastric mucus,
increasing mucosal blood flow, and maintaining epithelial cell barrier
function. The central nervous system (CNS) and hormonal factors also
play a role in regulating mucosal defense through multiple pathways
(Fig. 324-3).
Since the discovery of Helicobacter pylori and its impact on gastric
pathology, it has become clear that the stomach has an elaborate and
complex inherent immunologic system in place. Although a detailed
description of the gastric immune system is beyond the scope of this
chapter, several features are worth highlighting. The gastric immune
response to certain pathogens such as H. pylori (see below) involves
extensive interplay between innate (dendritic cells, epithelial cells,
neutrophils, and macrophages) and adaptive (B and T cells) components. Helper T cells (TH and TH regulatory cells) have been extensively
studied and appear to play an important role in a broad array of gastric
physiology extending from gastric secretion to epithelial cell turnover
via production of a number of cytokines.
The discovery of H. pylori has also led to the understanding that
the stomach, once thought to be devoid of microorganisms due to
its highly adverse environment (acid and pepsin), can serve as host
for bacterial communities consisting of hundreds of phylotypes,
otherwise known as its microbiota. The conceptual framework of
the microbiome has been receiving extensive attention in light of its
importance in human health and disease. The overall relevance of the
gastric microbiome and its impact on gastric pathology remain to be
established, but it is likely that alteration of microorganism homeostasis will play a role in aspects of certain disorders such as PUD,
gastritis, and gastric cancer.
Physiology of Gastric Secretion HCl and pepsinogen are the
two principal gastric secretory products capable of inducing mucosal
injury. Gastric acid and pepsinogen play a physiologic role in protein
digestion; absorption of iron, calcium, magnesium, and vitamin B12;
and killing ingested bacteria. Acid secretion should be viewed as occurring under basal and stimulated conditions. Basal acid production
occurs in a circadian pattern, with the highest levels occurring during
the night and lowest levels during the morning hours. Cholinergic
input via the vagus nerve and histaminergic input from local gastric
sources are the principal contributors to basal acid secretion. Stimulated gastric acid secretion occurs primarily in three phases based on
the site where the signal originates (cephalic, gastric, and intestinal).
Sight, smell, and taste of food are the components of the cephalic phase,
which stimulates gastric secretion via the vagus nerve. The gastric
phase is activated once food enters the stomach. This component of
2436 PART 10 Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
secretion is driven by nutrients (amino acids and amines) that directly
(via peptone and amino acid receptors) and indirectly (via stimulation
of intramural gastrin-releasing peptide neurons) stimulate the G cell to
release gastrin, which in turn activates the parietal cell via direct and
indirect mechanisms. Distention of the stomach wall also leads to gastrin release and acid production. The last phase of gastric acid secretion
is initiated as food enters the intestine and is mediated by luminal distention and nutrient assimilation. A series of pathways that inhibit gastric acid production are also set into motion during these phases. The
GI hormone somatostatin is released from endocrine cells found in the
gastric mucosa (D cells) in response to HCl. Somatostatin can inhibit
acid production by both direct (parietal cell) and indirect mechanisms
(decreased histamine release from ECL cells, ghrelin release from Gr
cells and gastrin release from G cells). Additional neural (central and
peripheral) and humoral (amylin, atrial natriuretic peptide [ANP],
cholecystokinin, ghrelin, interleukin 11 [IL-11], obestatin, secretin,
and serotonin) factors play a role in counterbalancing acid secretion.
Under physiologic circumstances, these phases occur simultaneously.
Ghrelin, the appetite-regulating hormone expressed in Gr cells in the
stomach, and its related peptide motilin (released from the duodenum)
may increase gastric acid secretion through stimulation of histamine
release from ECL cells, but this remains to be confirmed.
The acid-secreting parietal cell is located in the oxyntic gland,
adjacent to other cellular elements (ECL cell, D cell) important in the
gastric secretory process (Fig. 324-5). This unique cell also secretes
intrinsic factor (IF) and IL-11. The parietal cell expresses receptors for
several stimulants of acid secretion, including histamine (H2
), gastrin
(cholecystokinin 2/gastrin receptor), and acetylcholine (muscarinic,
FIGURE 324-3 Components involved in providing gastroduodenal mucosal defense and repair. CCK, cholecystokinin; CRF, corticotropin-releasing factor; EGF, epidermal
growth factor; HCl, hydrochloride; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; TGFα, transforming growth factor α; TRF, thyrotropin releasing factor. (Republished with permission of
John Wiley and Son’s Inc, from Bioregulation and Its Disorders in the Gastrointestinal Tract, T Yoshikawa, T Arakawa [eds]: 1998; permission conveyed through Copyright
Clearance Center, Inc.)
2437Peptic Ulcer Disease and Related Disorders CHAPTER 324
M3
). Binding of histamine to the H2
receptor leads to activation of
adenylate cyclase and the phosphoinositol pathways, in turn resulting
in an increase in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and intracellular calcium, respectively. Activation of the gastrin and muscarinic
receptors results in activation of the protein kinase C/phosphoinositide
signaling pathway. Each of these signaling pathways in turn regulates
a series of downstream kinase cascades that control the acid-secreting
pump, H+,K+-ATPase. The discovery that different ligands and their
corresponding receptors lead to activation of different signaling pathways explains the potentiation of acid secretion that occurs when histamine and gastrin or acetylcholine are combined. More importantly, this
observation explains why blocking one receptor type (H2
) decreases
acid secretion stimulated by agents that activate a different pathway
(gastrin, acetylcholine). Parietal cells also express receptors for ligands
that inhibit acid production (glucagon-like peptide-1, prostaglandins,
somatostatin, EGF, neurotensin, and urocortin). Histamine also stimulates gastric acid secretion indirectly by activating the histamine H3
receptor on D cells, which inhibits somatostatin release.
The enzyme H+,K+-ATPase is responsible for generating the large
concentration of H+. It is a membrane-bound protein that consists of
two subunits, α and β. The active catalytic site is found within the α
subunit; the function of the β subunit is unclear. This enzyme uses the
chemical energy of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to transfer H+ ions
from parietal cell cytoplasm to the secretory canaliculi in exchange
for K+. The H+,K+-ATPase is located within the secretory canaliculus
and in nonsecretory cytoplasmic tubulovesicles. The tubulovesicles are
impermeable to K+, which leads to an inactive pump in this location.
The distribution of pumps between the nonsecretory vesicles and the
secretory canaliculus varies according to parietal cell activity (Fig. 324-2).
Proton pumps are recycled back to the inactive state in cytoplasmic
vesicles once parietal cell activation ceases. Ezrin (an actin binding protein), actin, myosin, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs), small G proteins of the Rab family,
and secretory carrier membrane proteins (SCAMPS) are postulated
to participate in parietal cell membrane translocation. In addition,
acid secretion requires a number of apical and basolateral parietal cell
membrane chloride and potassium channels. Parietal cells also express
members of the sonic hedgehog (Shh) family proteins, which play an
important role in regulating cell types in multiple organs. This family
of proteins may also regulate cell differentiation as well as restitution of
mucosal defense in the gastric epithelium.
The chief cell, found primarily in the gastric fundus, synthesizes and
secretes pepsinogen, the inactive precursor of the proteolytic enzyme
pepsin. The acid environment within the stomach leads to cleavage of
the inactive precursor to pepsin and provides the low pH (<2) required
for pepsin activity. Pepsin activity is significantly diminished at a pH of
4 and irreversibly inactivated and denatured at a pH of ≥7. Many of the
secretagogues that stimulate acid secretion also stimulate pepsinogen
release. The precise role of pepsin in the pathogenesis of PUD remains
to be established.
■ PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC BASIS OF PUD
PUD encompasses both gastric ulcers (GUs) and duodenal ulcers
(DUs). Ulcers are defined as breaks in the mucosal surface >5 mm in
size, with depth to the submucosa. DUs and GUs share many common
features in terms of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment, but several
factors distinguish them from one another. H. pylori and NSAIDs are
the most common risk factors for PUD, with estimated odds ratios in
the United States of 3.7 and 3.3, respectively. Additional risk factors
(odds ratio) include chronic obstructive lung disease (2.34), chronic
renal insufficiency (2.29), current tobacco use (1.99), former tobacco
use (1.55), older age (1.67), three or more doctor visits in a year (1.49),
coronary heart disease (1.46), former alcohol use (1.29), AfricanAmerican race (1.20), obesity (1.18), and diabetes (1.13). Selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and gastric bypass surgery are
also associated with an increased incidence of PUD. A rise in idiopathic PUD has also been noted. The mechanisms by which some of
these risk factors lead to ulcer disease are
highlighted below.
Epidemiology • DUODENAL ULCERS
DUs are estimated to occur in 6–15% of
the Western population. The incidence
of DUs declined steadily from 1960 to
1980 and has remained stable since then.
The death rates, need for surgery, and
physician visits have decreased by >50%
over the past 30 years. The reason for
the reduction in the frequency of DUs is
likely related to the decreasing frequency
of H. pylori in turn associated with overall improved sanitary conditions across
the world. Before the discovery of H.
pylori, the natural history of DUs was
typified by frequent recurrences after initial therapy. Eradication of H. pylori has
reduced these recurrence rates by >80%.
GASTRIC ULCERS GUs tend to occur
later in life than duodenal lesions, with
a peak incidence reported in the sixth
decade. More than one-half of GUs occur
Membrane phospholipids
Arachidonic acid
Phospholipase A2
Stomach
Kidney
Platelets
Endothelium
TXA2, PGI2, PGE2 Gastrointestinal mucosal integrity
Platelet aggregation
Renal function
PGI2, PGE2 Inflammation
Mitogenesis
Bone formation
Other functions?
Macrophages
Leukocytes
Fibroblasts
Endothelium
COX-1
housekeeping
COX-2
inflammation
FIGURE 324-4 Schematic representation of the steps involved in synthesis of
prostaglandin E2
(PGE2
) and prostacyclin (PGI2
). Characteristics and distribution
of the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes 1 and 2 are also shown. TXA2
, thromboxane A2
.
Vagus
CGRP
EC Cell
(ANP)
D Cell
(SST)
G Cell
(Gastrin)
D Cell
(SST)
H2 H3
Parietal
Cell
ECL Cell
(Histamine)
Antrum Fundus
HP
(Chronic Antrum)
Acid
HP (Acute)
–
–
– +
+
+ +
+
+ +
+
+
+
+
+ – –
–
–
–
–
PACAP ACh VIP ACh ACh GRP ACh ACh
FIGURE 324-5 Regulation of gastric acid secretion at the cellular level. ACh, acetylcholine; ANP, atrial natriuretic
peptide; CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; EC, enterochromaffin; ECL, enterochromaffin-like; GRP, gastrinreleasing peptide; PACAP, pituitary adenylate-cyclase activating peptide; SST, somatostatin; VIP, vasoactive intestinal
peptide.
2438 PART 10 Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
in males and are less common than DUs, perhaps due to the higher
likelihood of GUs being silent and presenting only after a complication
develops. Autopsy studies suggest a similar incidence of DUs and GUs.
Pathology • DUODENAL ULCERS DUs occur most often in the
first portion of the duodenum (>95%), with ~90% located within 3 cm
of the pylorus. They are usually ≤1 cm in diameter but can occasionally
reach 3–6 cm (giant ulcer). Ulcers are sharply demarcated, with depth
at times reaching the muscularis propria. The base of the ulcer often
consists of a zone of eosinophilic necrosis with surrounding fibrosis.
Malignant DUs are extremely rare.
GASTRIC ULCERS In contrast to DUs, GUs can represent a malignancy
and should be biopsied upon discovery. Benign GUs are most often
found distal to the junction between the antrum and the acid secretory
mucosa. Benign GUs are quite rare in the gastric fundus and are histologically similar to DUs. Benign GUs associated with H. pylori are also
associated with antral gastritis. In contrast, NSAID-related GUs are not
accompanied by chronic active gastritis but may instead have evidence
of a chemical gastropathy, typified by foveolar hyperplasia, edema of
the lamina propria, and epithelial regeneration in the absence of H.
pylori. Extension of smooth-muscle fibers into the upper portions of
the mucosa, where they are not typically found, may also occur.
Pathophysiology • DUODENAL ULCERS H. pylori and NSAIDinduced injuries account for the majority of DUs. Many acid secretory
abnormalities have been described in DU patients. Of these, average
basal and nocturnal gastric acid secretion appears to be increased in
DU patients as compared to controls; however, the level of overlap
between DU patients and control subjects is substantial. The reason for
this altered secretory process is unclear, but H. pylori infection may contribute. Bicarbonate secretion is significantly decreased in the duodenal
bulb of patients with an active DU as compared to control subjects.
H. pylori infection may also play a role in this process (see below).
GASTRIC ULCERS As in DUs, the majority of GUs can be attributed to
either H. pylori or NSAID-induced mucosal damage. Prepyloric GUs or
those in the body associated with a DU or a duodenal scar are similar
in pathogenesis to DUs. Gastric acid output (basal and stimulated)
tends to be normal or decreased in GU patients. When GUs develop
in the presence of minimal acid levels, impairment of mucosal defense
factors may be present. GUs have been classified based on their location: type I occur in the gastric body and tend to be associated with low
gastric acid production; type II occur in the antrum, and gastric acid
can vary from low to normal; type III occur within 3 cm of the pylorus
and are commonly accompanied by DUs and normal or high gastric
acid production; and type IV are found in the cardia and are associated
with low gastric acid production.
H. PYLORI AND ACID PEPTIC DISORDERS Gastric infection with the
bacterium H. pylori accounts for the majority of PUD (Chap. 163). This
organism also plays a role in the development of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and gastric adenocarcinoma.
Although the entire genome of H. pylori has been sequenced, it is still
not clear how this organism, which resides in the stomach, causes
ulceration in the duodenum. H. pylori eradication efforts may lead
to a decrease in gastric cancer in high-risk populations, particularly
in individuals who have not developed chronic atrophic gastritis and
gastric metaplasia.
The Bacterium The bacterium, initially named Campylobacter pyloridis,
is a gram-negative microaerophilic rod found most commonly in
the deeper portions of the mucous gel coating the gastric mucosa or
between the mucous layer and the gastric epithelium. It may attach to
gastric epithelium but under normal circumstances does not appear
to invade cells. It is strategically designed to live within the aggressive
environment of the stomach. It is S-shaped (~0.5–3 μm in size) and
contains multiple sheathed flagella. Initially, H. pylori resides in the
antrum but, over time, migrates toward the more proximal segments
of the stomach. The organism is capable of transforming into a coccoid
form, which represents a dormant state that may facilitate survival in
adverse conditions. The genome of H. pylori (1.65 million base pairs)
encodes ~1500 proteins. Among this multitude of proteins there are
factors that are essential determinants of H. pylori–mediated pathogenesis and colonization such as the outer membrane protein (Hop
proteins), urease, and the vacuolating cytotoxin (Vac A). Moreover,
the majority of H. pylori strains contain a genomic fragment that
encodes the cag pathogenicity island (cag-PAI). Several of the genes
that make up cag-PAI encode components of a type IV secretion island
that translocates Cag A into host cells. Once in the cell, Cag A activates a series of cellular events important in cell growth and cytokine
production. H. pylori also has extensive genetic diversity that in turn
enhances its ability to promote disease. The first step in infection by
H. pylori is dependent on the bacteria’s motility and its ability to produce urease. Urease produces ammonia from urea, an essential step in
alkalinizing the surrounding pH. Additional bacterial factors include
catalase, lipase, adhesins, platelet-activating factor, and pic B (induces
cytokines). Multiple strains of H. pylori exist and are characterized by
their ability to express several of these factors (Cag A, Vac A, etc.). It is
possible that the different diseases related to H. pylori infection can be
attributed to different strains of the organism with distinct pathogenic
features.
Epidemiology The prevalence of H. pylori varies throughout the world
and depends largely on the overall standard of living in the region. In
developing parts of the world, 80% of the population may be infected
by the age of 20, whereas the prevalence is 20–50% in industrialized
countries. In contrast, in the United States, this organism is rare in
childhood. The overall prevalence of H. pylori in the United States is
~30%, with individuals born before 1950 having a higher rate of infection than those born later. About 10% of Americans <30 years of age
are colonized with the bacteria. The rate of infection with H. pylori in
industrialized countries has decreased substantially in recent decades.
The steady increase in the prevalence of H. pylori noted with increasing
age is due primarily to a cohort effect, reflecting higher transmission
during a period in which the earlier cohorts were children. It has been
calculated through mathematical models that improved sanitation
during the latter half of the nineteenth century dramatically decreased
transmission of H. pylori. Moreover, with the present rate of intervention, the organism will be ultimately eliminated from the United States.
Two factors that predispose to higher colonization rates include poor
socioeconomic status and less education. These factors, not race, are
responsible for the rate of H. pylori infection in blacks and Hispanic
Americans being double the rate seen in whites of comparable age.
Other risk factors for H. pylori infection are (1) birth or residence in a
developing country, (2) domestic crowding, (3) unsanitary living conditions, (4) unclean food or water, and (5) exposure to gastric contents
of an infected individual.
Transmission of H. pylori occurs from person to person, following
an oral-oral or fecal-oral route. The risk of H. pylori infection is declining in developing countries. The rate of infection in the United States
has fallen by >50% when compared to 30 years ago.
Pathophysiology H. pylori infection is virtually always associated with
a chronic active gastritis, but only 10–15% of infected individuals develop frank peptic ulceration. The basis for this difference is
unknown but is likely due to a combination of host and bacterial factors, some of which are outlined below. Initial studies suggested that
>90% of all DUs were associated with H. pylori, but H. pylori is present
in only 30–60% of individuals with GUs and 50–70% of patients with
DUs. The pathophysiology of ulcers not associated with H. pylori or
NSAID ingestion (or the rare Zollinger-Ellison syndrome [ZES]) is
becoming more relevant as the incidence of H. pylori is dropping, particularly in the Western world (see below).
The particular end result of H. pylori infection (gastritis, PUD,
gastric MALT lymphoma, gastric cancer) is determined by a complex
interplay between bacterial and host factors (Fig. 324-6).
Bacterial factors: H. pylori is able to facilitate gastric residence,
induce mucosal injury, and avoid host defense. Different strains of
H. pylori produce different virulence factors including γ-glutamyl
transpeptidase (GGT), cytotoxin-associated gene A (Cag A) product,
and virulence components vacuolating toxin (Vac A), in addition to
2439Peptic Ulcer Disease and Related Disorders CHAPTER 324
pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) such as flagella and
lipopolysaccharide (LPS). A specific region of the bacterial genome,
the pathogenicity island (cag-PAI), encodes the virulence factors Cag
A and pic B. Vac A also contributes to pathogenicity, although it is not
encoded within the pathogenicity island. These virulence factors, in
conjunction with additional bacterial constituents, can cause mucosal
damage, in part through their ability to target the host immune cells.
For example, Vac A targets human CD4 T cells, inhibiting their proliferation, and in addition can disrupt normal function of B cells, CD8
T cells, macrophages, and mast cells. Multiple studies have demonstrated that H. pylori strains that are cag-PAI positive are associated
with a higher risk of PUD, premalignant gastric lesions, and gastric
cancer than are strains that lack the cag-PAI. In addition, H. pylori
may directly inhibit parietal cell H+,K+-ATPase activity through a Cag
A–dependent mechanism, leading in part to the low acid production
observed after acute infection with the organism. Urease, which allows
the bacteria to reside in the acidic stomach, generates NH3
, which can
damage epithelial cells. The bacteria produce surface factors that are
chemotactic for neutrophils and monocytes, which in turn contribute
to epithelial cell injury (see below). H. pylori makes proteases and
phospholipases that break down the glycoprotein lipid complex of
the mucous gel, thus reducing the efficacy of this first line of mucosal
defense. H. pylori expresses adhesins (outer membrane proteins like
BabA), which facilitate attachment of the bacteria to gastric epithelial
cells. Although LPS of gram-negative bacteria often plays an important
role in the infection, H. pylori LPS has low immunologic activity compared to that of other organisms. It may promote a smoldering chronic
inflammation.
Host factors: Studies in twins suggest that there may be genetic
predisposition to acquire H. pylori. The inflammatory response to H.
pylori includes recruitment of neutrophils, lymphocytes (T and B),
macrophages, and plasma cells. The pathogen leads to local injury by
binding to class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules
expressed on gastric epithelial cells, leading to cell death (apoptosis).
Moreover, bacterial strains that encode cag-PAI can introduce Cag
A into the host cells, leading to further cell injury and activation of
cellular pathways involved in cytokine production and repression of
tumor-suppressor genes. Elevated concentrations of multiple cytokines
are found in the gastric epithelium of H. pylori–infected individuals,
including interleukin (IL) 1α/β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor
(TNF) α, and interferon (IFN) γ. H. pylori infection also leads to both
a mucosal and a systemic humoral response, which does not lead to
eradication of the bacteria but further compounds epithelial cell injury.
Additional mechanisms by which H. pylori may cause epithelial cell
injury include (1) activated neutrophil-mediated production of reactive oxygen or nitrogen species and enhanced epithelial cell turnover
and (2) apoptosis related to interaction with T cells (T helper 1 [TH1]
cells) and IFN-γ. Finally, the human stomach is colonized by a host
of commensal organisms that may affect the likelihood of H. pylori
infection and subsequent mucosal injury. Moreover, colonization of
the stomach with H. pylori likely alters the composition of the gastric
microbiota. The impact of the latter on gastric pathophysiology remains
unknown. H. pylori also appears to regulate NO formation via different
mechanisms that in turn may contribute to the organism’s cytotoxic
effects. Specifically, H. pylori–derived factors, such as urease, or the bacterium itself, stimulate NO synthase (NOS2) expression in macrophages
and in gastric epithelial cells leading to NO release and subsequent cytotoxic effect on surrounding cells. H. pylori also leads to the formation of
8-nitroguanine (8-NO2-Gua), which in conjunction with oncoprotein
Cag A, may contribute to the development of gastric cancer.
The reason for H. pylori–mediated duodenal ulceration remains
unclear. Studies suggest that H. pylori associated with duodenal ulceration may be more virulent. In addition, certain specific bacterial
factors such as the DU-promoting gene A (dupA) may be associated
with the development of DUs. Another potential contributing factor
is that gastric metaplasia in the duodenum of DU patients, which may
be due to high acid exposure (see below), permits H. pylori to bind to
it and produce local injury secondary to the host response. Another
hypothesis is that H. pylori antral infection could lead to increased
acid production, increased duodenal acid, and mucosal injury. Basal
and stimulated (meal, gastrin-releasing peptide [GRP]) gastrin release
is increased in H. pylori–infected individuals, and somatostatinsecreting D cells may be decreased. H. pylori infection might induce
increased acid secretion through both direct and indirect actions of
H. pylori and proinflammatory cytokines (IL-8, TNF, and IL-1) on G,
D, and parietal cells (Fig. 324-7). GUs, in contrast, are associated with
H. pylori–induced pangastritis and normal or low gastric acid secretion. The H. pylori–mediated decrease in gastric acid secretion after
long-term infection may be due to the bacterium’s ability to inhibit
H+,K+-ATPase expression. H. pylori infection has also been associated
with decreased duodenal mucosal bicarbonate production. Data supporting and contradicting each of these interesting theories have been
demonstrated. Thus, the mechanism by which H. pylori infection of
the stomach leads to duodenal ulceration remains to be established.
The development of in vitro organoids, a unique tool that replicates
in part the multicellular structure of the intact organ, provides a more
physiologic model for experimentation in an invitro system. Moreover,
the development of advanced microscopic optical imaging techniques
Bacterial factors
Structure
Adhesins
Porins
Enzymes
(urease, vac A, cag A, etc.)
Host factors
Duration
Location
Inflammatory response
Genetics??
Chronic gastritis
Peptic ulcer disease
Gastric MALT lymphoma
Gastric cancer
FIGURE 324-6 Outline of the bacterial and host factors important in determining
H. pylori–induced gastrointestinal disease. MALT, mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue.
Parietal cell FUNDUS
Vagus
Acetylcholine
Histamine
Histamine
H, K ATPase
Tubulovesicles
Somatostatin
Somatostatin
ECL cell
Gastrin
ECL cell
D cell
Canaliculus
Blood vessel
Gastrin
D cell
G cell
ANTRUM
Somatostatin
+ +
–
–
+
+
+
–
FIGURE 324-7 Summary of potential mechanisms by which H. pylori may lead to
gastric secretory abnormalities. D, somatostatin cell; ECL, enterochromaffin-like cell;
G, G cell. (Reproduced with permission from J Calam et al: How does Helicobacter pylori
cause mucosal damage? Its effect on acid and gastrin physiology. Gastroenterology
113:543, 1997.)
2440 PART 10 Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
will lead to increased understanding of parietal cell adaptation to
H. pylori infection.
In summary, the final effect of H. pylori on the GI tract is variable
and determined by microbial and host factors. The type and distribution of gastritis correlate with the ultimate gastric and duodenal
pathology observed. Specifically, the presence of antral-predominant
gastritis is associated with DU formation; gastritis involving primarily
the corpus predisposes to the development of GUs, gastric atrophy, and
ultimately gastric carcinoma (Fig. 324-8).
NSAID-INDUCED DISEASE
Epidemiology NSAIDs represent a group of the most commonly used
medications in the world and the United States. It is estimated that
7 billion dollars per year are spent on NSAIDs worldwide, with >30 billion over-the-counter tablets sold. More than 30 million individuals
take NSAIDs, with >100 million prescriptions sold yearly in the
United States alone. In fact, after the introduction of COX-2 inhibitors
in the year 2000, the number of prescriptions written for NSAIDs was
>111 million at a cost of $4.8 billion. Side effects and complications due
to NSAIDs are considered the most common drug-related toxicities in
the United States. The spectrum of NSAID-induced morbidity ranges
from nausea and dyspepsia (prevalence reported as high as 50–60%)
to a serious GI complication such as endoscopy-documented peptic
ulceration (15–30% of individuals taking NSAIDs regularly), which
is complicated by bleeding or perforation in as many as 1.5% of users
per year. It is estimated that NSAID-induced GI bleeding accounts
for 60,000–120,000 hospital admissions per year, and deaths related
to NSAID-induced toxicity may be as high as 16,000 per year in the
United States. Approximately 4–5% of patients develop symptomatic
ulcers within 1 year. Unfortunately, dyspeptic symptoms do not correlate with NSAID-induced pathology. Over 80% of patients with serious NSAID-related complications did not have preceding dyspepsia. In
view of the lack of warning signs, it is important to identify patients who
are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality related to NSAID usage.
Even 75 mg/d of aspirin may lead to serious GI ulceration; thus, no dose
of NSAID is completely safe. In fact, the incidence of mucosal injury
(ulcers and erosions) in patients taking low-dose aspirin (75–325 mg)
has been estimated to range from as low as 8 to as high as 60%. It appears
that H. pylori infection increases the risk of PUD-associated GI bleeding
in chronic users of low-dose aspirin. Established risk factors include
advanced age, history of ulcer, concomitant use of glucocorticoids, highdose NSAIDs, multiple NSAIDs, concomitant use of anticoagulants or
clopidogrel, and serious or multisystem disease. Possible risk factors
include concomitant infection with H. pylori, cigarette smoking, and
alcohol consumption. SSRIs have a synergistic effect on the induction of
GI bleeding believed to be due in part to this agent’s ability to decrease
platelet aggregation by decreasing serotonin content in platelets.
Pathophysiology Prostaglandins play a critical role in maintaining
gastroduodenal mucosal integrity and repair. It therefore follows that
interruption of prostaglandin synthesis can impair mucosal defense
and repair, thus facilitating mucosal injury via a systemic mechanism.
Animal studies have demonstrated that neutrophil adherence to the
gastric microcirculation plays an essential role in the initiation of
NSAID-induced mucosal injury. A summary of the pathogenetic pathways by which systemically administered NSAIDs may lead to mucosal
injury is shown in Fig. 324-9. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
have been found in several genes, including those encoding certain
subtypes of cytochrome P450 (see below), IL-1β (IL-1β), angiotensinogen (AGT), and an organic ion transporting polypeptide (SLCO1B1),
but these findings need confirmation in larger-scale studies.
Injury to the mucosa also occurs as a result of the topical use of
NSAIDs, leading to increased epithelial surface permeability. Aspirin
and many NSAIDs are weak acids that remain in a nonionized lipophilic form when found within the acid environment of the stomach.
Under these conditions, NSAIDs migrate across lipid membranes of
epithelial cells, leading to cell injury once trapped intracellularly in an
ionized form. Topical NSAIDs can also alter the surface mucous layer,
permitting back diffusion of H+ and pepsin, leading to further epithelial cell damage. Moreover, enteric-coated or buffered preparations are
also associated with risk of peptic ulceration. NSAIDs can also lead to
mucosal injury via production of additional proinflammatory mediators such as TNF and leukotrienes through simultaneous activation of
the lipoxygenase pathway.
The interplay between H. pylori and NSAIDs in the pathogenesis
of PUD is complex. Meta-analysis supports the conclusion that each
of these aggressive factors is an independent and synergistic risk factor for PUD and its complications such as GI bleeding. For example,
eradication of H. pylori reduces the likelihood of GI complications in
high-risk individuals to levels observed in individuals with average risk
of NSAID-induced complications.
In summary, NSAID-induced mucosal injury is a multifaceted process involving the interaction of multiple, often synergistic pathophysiologic processes at the epithelium and surrounding interfaces.
PATHOGENETIC FACTORS UNRELATED TO H. PYLORI AND NSAIDS IN
ACID PEPTIC DISEASE Cigarette smoking has been implicated in
the pathogenesis of PUD. Not only have smokers been found to have
ulcers more frequently than do nonsmokers, but smoking appears
to decrease healing rates, impair response to therapy, and increase
High level of acid production
Low level of acid production
Childhood Advanced age
Normal gastric
mucosa
Acute
H. pylori
infection
Chronic
H. pylori
infection
Antralpredominant
gastritis
Nonatrophic
pangastritis
Corpuspredominant
atrophic
gastritis Gastric ulcer
Gastric
cancer
Intestinal metaplasia
Dysplasia
Duodenal ulcer
MALT
lymphoma
Asymptomatic
H. pylori
infection
FIGURE 324-8 Natural history of H. pylori infection. MALT, mucosal-associated
lymphoid tissue. (From S Suerbaum, P Michetti: Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J
Med 347:1175, 2002. Copyright © 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with
permission from Massachusetts Medical Society.)
Gastrointestinal mucosal injury
Mitochondrial uncoupling
Reactive prooxidants
MOS
ATP
M itochondrial fission
Mucosal PGHS-1
PGE2
Mucosal defense
Intestinal mucosal barrier function
Mucosal inflammation
Apoptosis
FIGURE 324-9 Effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on different
target organs. The action of NSAIDs on major organs including stomach, small
intestine, heart, liver, kidney, respiratory tract, and brain is mainly mediated through
prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase (PGHS)–dependent prostanoid modulation
and alteration of mitochondrial functional integrity leading to mitochondrial
oxidative stress (MOS) generation, depolarization of mitochondrial transmembrane
potential (ΔΨm), and consequent cell death. However, in heart, low-dose aspirin
actually offers cardioprotection through antithrombotic effect. Upward arrows
indicate upregulation/elevation; downward arrows indicate downregulation/
depletion. (From S Bindu et al: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and
organ damage: A current perspective. Biochem Pharmacol 180:114147, 2020.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع