1411CHAPTER 182 Syphilis
Both are reactive in persons with any treponemal infection, including
syphilis, yaws, pinta, and endemic syphilis.
The most widely used lipoidal antibody tests are the RPR and VDRL
tests, which measure IgG and IgM directed against a cardiolipinlecithin-cholesterol antigen complex. The RPR test is easier to perform
and uses unheated serum or plasma; it is the test of choice for rapid
serologic diagnosis in a clinical setting. The VDRL test remains the
standard for examining CSF and is superior to the RPR for this purpose. Either test is recommended for screening and for quantitation of
serum antibody. The titer reflects disease activity, rising during early
syphilis, often exceeding 1:32 in secondary syphilis, and declining
slowly thereafter without therapy. After treatment for early syphilis,
a persistent fall by fourfold or more (e.g., a decline from 1:32 to 1:8)
is considered an adequate response. VDRL titers do not correspond
directly to RPR titers, and sequential quantitative testing (as for
response to therapy) must employ a single test. A reactive VDRL/RPR
screening test must be confirmed by a treponemal test to rule out a
biological false-positive reaction.
Treponemal tests measure antibodies to native or recombinant T.
pallidum antigens and include the fluorescent treponemal antibody–
absorbed (FTA-ABS) test and the T. pallidum particle agglutination
(TPPA) test, both of which are more sensitive for primary syphilis than
the lipoidal tests. When used to confirm reactive lipoidal test results,
treponemal tests have a very high positive predictive value for diagnosis of syphilis.
Treponemal enzyme or chemiluminescence immunoassays (EIAs/
CIAs), based largely on reactivity to recombinant antigens, are now
widely used as screening tests by large laboratories. When these tests
are used for screening, a high proportion of sera reactive by EIA/CIA
are nonreactive by lipoidal tests. Such sera should be examined in the
TPPA test, which includes different antigens and a different platform.
If the TPPA test is nonreactive, the patient is unlikely to have syphilis;
if it is reactive, the patient is likely to have current or past syphilis.
Both lipoidal and treponemal tests may be nonreactive in early primary syphilis, although treponemal tests are slightly more sensitive
(85–90%) during this stage than lipoidal tests (~80%). All tests are
reactive during secondary syphilis. (Fewer than 1% of patients with
high titers have a lipoidal test that is nonreactive or weakly reactive
with undiluted serum but is reactive with diluted serum—the prozone
phenomenon.) VDRL and RPR sensitivity and titers may decline in
untreated persons with late latent syphilis, but treponemal tests remain
reactive in late syphilis. After treatment for early syphilis, lipoidal
test titers will generally decline or the tests will become nonreactive,
whereas treponemal tests often remain reactive after therapy and are
not helpful in determining the infection status of persons with past
syphilis. There is some concern in the literature about persons in whom
the lipoidal test titer fails to become nonreactive or remains reactive in
low titer after treatment. The implications in such cases are unclear, but
re-treatment rarely achieves the desired goal and is not recommended
in the absence of clinical findings.
False-Positive Serologic Tests for Syphilis The lipid antigens
of nontreponemal tests are similar to those found in human tissues,
and these tests may be reactive (usually with titers ≤1:8) in persons
without treponemal infection, largely limited to persons with autoimmune conditions or injection drug use. Among patients being screened
for syphilis because of risk factors, clinical suspicion, or history of
exposure, ~1% of reactive tests are falsely positive. In a patient with a
false-positive nontreponemal test, syphilis is excluded by a nonreactive
treponemal test.
False-positive reactions may also occur with treponemal tests, particularly the EIA/CIA tests. Screening a low-prevalence population for
syphilis with a treponemal test may result in true-positive reactions
being outnumbered by false-positive reactions, leading to unnecessary
treatment. Thus, screening with lipoidal tests is highly recommended.
■ EVALUATION FOR NEUROSYPHILIS
Involvement of the CNS is detected by examination of CSF for mononuclear pleocytosis (>5 white blood cells/μL), increased protein concentration (>45 mg/dL), or CSF VDRL reactivity. Elevated CSF cell
counts and protein concentrations are not specific for neurosyphilis
and may be confounded by HIV co-infection. Because CSF pleocytosis
may also be due to HIV, some studies have suggested using a CSF white
cell cutoff of 20 cells/μL as diagnostic of neurosyphilis in HIV-infected
patients with syphilis. The CSF VDRL test is highly specific and, when
reactive, is considered diagnostic of neurosyphilis; however, this test is
insensitive and may be nonreactive even in cases of symptomatic neurosyphilis. The RPR test should not be substituted for the VDRL test for
CSF examination. The FTA-ABS test on CSF is reactive far more often
than the CSF VDRL test in all stages of syphilis, but reactivity may
reflect passive transfer of serum antibody into the CSF. A nonreactive
FTA-ABS test on CSF, however, may be used to rule out asymptomatic
neurosyphilis. Measuring CXCL13 in CSF has been demonstrated to
distinguish between neurosyphilis and HIV-related CSF abnormalities.
All T. pallidum–infected patients with signs or symptoms consistent
with neurologic disease (e.g., meningitis, hearing loss) or ophthalmic
disease (e.g., uveitis, iritis) should have a CSF examination, regardless of disease stage. The appropriate management of asymptomatic
persons is less clear. Lumbar puncture on all asymptomatic patients
with untreated syphilis is impractical and unnecessary. Even at high
doses, penicillin G benzathine fails to result in treponemicidal drug
levels in CSF, and viable T. pallidum have been isolated from the CSF
of patients (with and without HIV infection) after penicillin G benzathine treatment for early syphilis. Therefore, it is important to identify
those persons at higher risk for having or developing neurosyphilis
so that appropriate treatment may be given. Large-scale prospective
studies have provided evidence-based guidelines for determining
which syphilis patients may benefit most from CSF examination. Specifically, patients with RPR titers of ≥1:32 are at higher risk of having
neurosyphilis (11-fold and 6-fold higher in HIV-infected and HIVuninfected persons, respectively), as are HIV-infected patients with
CD4+ T-cell counts of ≤350/μL. Persons with active tertiary syphilis
and those in whom treatment failure is suspected should also have their
CSF examined to determine appropriate therapy.
■ EVALUATION OF HIV-INFECTED PATIENTS FOR
SYPHILIS
Because persons at highest risk for syphilis are also at increased risk
for HIV infection, these two infections frequently coexist. There is
evidence that syphilis and other genital ulcer diseases are important
risk factors for acquisition and transmission of HIV infection. Some
manifestations of syphilis may be altered in patients with concurrent
untreated HIV infection, and multiple cases of neurologic relapse after
standard therapy have been reported in these patients.
Persons with newly diagnosed HIV infection should be tested for
syphilis; conversely, all patients with newly diagnosed syphilis should
be tested for HIV infection. Some authorities, persuaded by reports of
persistent T. pallidum in CSF of HIV-infected persons after standard
therapy for early syphilis, recommend CSF examination for evidence of
neurosyphilis for all co-infected patients, regardless of the stage of syphilis, with treatment for neurosyphilis if CSF abnormalities are found.
Others, on the basis of their own clinical experience, think that standard
therapy—without CSF examination—is sufficient for all cases of early
syphilis in HIV-infected patients without neurologic signs or symptoms. As described above, RPR titer and CD4+ T-cell count can be used
to identify patients at higher risk of neurosyphilis for lumbar puncture,
although some cases of neurosyphilis will be missed even when these
criteria are used. Serologic testing after treatment is important for all
patients with syphilis, particularly for those also infected with HIV.
TREATMENT
Syphilis
TREATMENT OF ACQUIRED SYPHILIS
The CDC’s 2015 guidelines for the treatment of syphilis are summarized in Table 182-1 and are discussed below. Penicillin G is
the drug of choice for all stages of syphilis. T. pallidum is killed by
very low concentrations of penicillin G, although a long period of
1412 PART 5 Infectious Diseases
exposure to penicillin is required because of the unusually slow
rate of multiplication of the organism. The efficacy of penicillin
against syphilis remains undiminished after 75 years of use, and
there is no evidence of penicillin resistance in T. pallidum. Other
antibiotics effective in syphilis include the tetracyclines and the
cephalosporins. Aminoglycosides and spectinomycin inhibit T. pallidum only in very large doses, and the sulfonamides and most
quinolones are inactive. Azithromycin showed significant promise
as an effective oral agent against T. pallidum; however, strains harboring 23S rDNA mutations that confer macrolide resistance are
widespread. Such strains represent >80–90% of recent isolates from
large U.S., European, and Chinese cities, although the prevalence
of resistant strains varies by geographic location. Routine treatment of syphilis with azithromycin is not recommended. Careful
follow-up of any patient treated for syphilis with azithromycin must
be assured.
Early Syphilis Patients and Their Contacts Penicillin G benzathine is the most widely used agent for the treatment of early syphilis (2.4 million units; Table 182-1), and for preventive treatment
of individuals exposed to infectious syphilis within the previous
3 months. The regimens recommended for prevention are the same as
those recommended for early syphilis. Penicillin G benzathine cures
>95% of cases of early syphilis, although clinical relapse can follow
treatment, particularly in patients with untreated HIV infection.
Because the risk of neurologic relapse may be higher in HIVinfected patients, CSF examination is recommended for HIVseropositive individuals with syphilis of any stage, particularly those
with a serum RPR titer of ≥1:32 or a CD4+ T-cell count of ≤350/μL.
Therapy appropriate for neurosyphilis should be given if there is
any evidence of CNS infection.
Late Latent Syphilis or Syphilis of Unknown Duration If the
CSF is normal or is not examined, the recommended treatment
is penicillin G benzathine (7.2 million units total; Table 182-1).
If CSF abnormalities are found, the patient should be treated for
neurosyphilis.
Tertiary Syphilis CSF examination should be performed. If the
CSF is normal, the recommended treatment is penicillin G benzathine (7.2 million units total; Table 182-1). If CSF is abnormal, the
patient should be treated for neurosyphilis. The clinical response
to treatment for benign tertiary syphilis is usually impressive, but
responses in cardiovascular syphilis are not dramatic because aortic
aneurysm and aortic regurgitation cannot be reversed by antibiotics.
Syphilis in Penicillin-Allergic Patients For penicillin-allergic
patients with syphilis, a 2-week (early syphilis) or 4-week (late or
late latent syphilis) course of therapy with doxycycline or tetracycline
is recommended (Table 182-1). These regimens appear to be quite
effective in early syphilis but have not been tested for late or late latent
syphilis, and compliance may be problematic. Limited studies suggest
that ceftriaxone (1 g/d, given IM or IV for 8–10 days) is effective for
early syphilis. These nonpenicillin regimens have not been carefully
evaluated in HIV-infected individuals and should be used with caution. If compliance and follow-up are not assured, penicillin-allergic
HIV-infected persons with late latent or late syphilis should be
desensitized and treated with penicillin.
Neurosyphilis Penicillin G benzathine, even at high doses, does
not produce treponemicidal concentrations of penicillin G in CSF
and should not be used for treatment of neurosyphilis. Asymptomatic
neurosyphilis may relapse as symptomatic disease after treatment
with benzathine penicillin, and the risk of relapse may be higher in
HIV-infected patients. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic neurosyphilis should be treated with aqueous penicillin (Table 182-1).
Administration of either IV aqueous crystalline penicillin G or of
IM aqueous procaine penicillin G plus oral probenecid in recommended doses is thought to ensure treponemicidal concentrations
of penicillin G in CSF. The clinical response to penicillin therapy
for meningeal syphilis is dramatic, but treatment of neurosyphilis
with existing parenchymal damage may only arrest disease progression. No data suggest that additional therapy (e.g., penicillin
G benzathine for 3 weeks) would be beneficial after treatment for
neurosyphilis.
The use of antibiotics other than penicillin G for the treatment
of neurosyphilis has not been studied, although limited data suggest that 1−2 g/d of IV ceftriaxone for 10−14 days may be used.
In patients with confirmed penicillin allergy, desensitization and
treatment with penicillin are recommended.
Management of Syphilis in Pregnancy Every pregnant woman
should undergo a lipoidal screening test at her first prenatal visit
and, if at high risk of re-exposure, again in the third trimester
and at delivery. In the untreated pregnant patient with presumed
syphilis, expeditious treatment appropriate to the stage of the disease is essential. Patients should be warned of the risk of a JarischHerxheimer reaction, which may be associated with mild premature contractions but rarely results in premature delivery.
Penicillin is the only recommended agent for the treatment of
syphilis in pregnancy. If the patient has a documented penicillin
allergy, desensitization and penicillin therapy should be undertaken
according to the CDC’s 2015 guidelines. After treatment, a quantitative nontreponemal test should be repeated monthly throughout
pregnancy to assess therapeutic efficacy. Treated women whose
antibody titers rise by fourfold or whose titers do not decrease by
fourfold over a 3-month period should be re-treated.
EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONGENITAL
SYPHILIS
Whether or not they are infected, newborn infants of women with
reactive serologic tests may themselves have reactive tests because
of transplacental transfer of maternal IgG antibodies.
TABLE 182-1 Recommendations for the Treatment of Syphilisa
STAGE OF SYPHILIS
PATIENTS WITHOUT
PENICILLIN ALLERGY
PATIENTS WITH CONFIRMED
PENICILLIN ALLERGY
Primary, secondary,
or early latent
CSF normal or not
examined: Penicillin G
benzathine (single dose
of 2.4 mU IM)
CSF abnormal: Treat as
neurosyphilis.
CSF normal or not examined:
Doxycycline (100 mg PO bid)
or tetracycline HCl (500 mg PO
qid) for 2 weeks
CSF abnormal: Treat as
neurosyphilis.
Late latent (or
latent of unknown
duration),
cardiovascular, or
benign tertiary
CSF normal or not
examined: Penicillin G
benzathine (2.4 mU IM
weekly for 3 weeks)
CSF abnormal: Treat as
neurosyphilis.
CSF normal and patient
not infected with HIV:
Doxycycline (100 mg PO bid)
or tetracycline HCl (500 mg PO
qid) for 4 weeks
CSF normal and patient
infected with HIV: Desensitize
and treat with penicillin
if compliance cannot be
assured.
CSF abnormal: Treat as
neurosyphilis.
Neurosyphilis
(asymptomatic or
symptomatic)
Aqueous crystalline
penicillin G (18–24 mU/d
IV, given as 3–4 mU q4h
or continuous infusion)
for 10–14 days
or
Aqueous procaine
penicillin G (2.4 mU/d IM)
plus oral probenecid
(500 mg qid), both for
10–14 days
Desensitize and treat with
penicillin.
Syphilis in
pregnancy
According to stage Desensitize and treat with
penicillin.
a
See text for indications for CSF examination.
Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; mU, million units.
Source: Adapted from the 2015 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from https://www.
cdc.gov/std/tg2015/default.htm.
1413CHAPTER 183 Endemic Treponematoses
For asymptomatic infants born to women treated adequately
with penicillin during the first or second trimester of pregnancy,
monthly quantitative nontreponemal tests may be performed to
monitor for appropriate reduction in antibody titers. Rising or
persistent titers indicate infection, and the infant should be treated.
Detection of neonatal IgM antibody is insensitive, and no commercially available test is currently recommended.
An infant should be treated at birth if (1) the treatment status of
the seropositive mother is unknown; (2) the mother received inadequate or nonpenicillin therapy; (3) the mother received penicillin
therapy in the third trimester; or (4) the infant may be difficult
to follow. The CSF should be examined to obtain baseline values
before treatment. Penicillin is the only recommended drug for the
treatment of syphilis in infants. Specific recommendations for the
treatment of infants and older children are included in the CDC’s
2015 treatment guidelines.
JARISCH-HERXHEIMER REACTION
A dramatic although self-limited reaction consisting of fever,
chills, myalgia, headache, tachycardia, increased respiratory rate,
increased circulating neutrophil count, and vasodilation with mild
hypotension may follow the initiation of treatment for syphilis.
This reaction is thought to be a response to lipoproteins released
by dying T. pallidum organisms. The Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction
occurs in ~50% of patients with primary syphilis, 90% of those
with secondary syphilis, and a lower proportion of persons with
later-stage disease. Defervescence takes place within 12–24 h. In
secondary syphilis, erythema and edema of cutaneous lesions may
increase. Patients should be warned to expect such developments,
which can be managed with symptom-based treatment. Steroid
therapy is not required for this mild transient reaction.
FOLLOW-UP EVALUATION OF RESPONSES TO THERAPY
Efficacy of treatment should be assessed by clinical evaluation and
monitoring of the quantitative VDRL or RPR titer for a fourfold
decline (e.g., from 1:32 to 1:8). Patients with primary or secondary syphilis should be examined 6 and 12 months after treatment,
and persons with latent or late syphilis at 6, 12, and 24 months.
More frequent clinical and serologic examination (3, 6, 9, 12, and
24 months) is recommended for patients concurrently infected with
HIV, regardless of the stage of syphilis.
After successful treatment of seropositive first-episode primary
or secondary syphilis, the VDRL or RPR titer progressively declines;
the test becomes nonreactive by 12 months in 40–75% of seropositive primary cases and in 20–40% of secondary cases. In patients
with HIV infection or a history of prior syphilis, VDRL and RPR
tests are less likely to become nonreactive. Rates of decline of
serologic titers appear to be slower, and serologically defined treatment failures more common, among HIV-infected patients than
among those without HIV co-infection; however, effective ART
may reduce these differences. Re-treatment should be considered
if serologic responses are not adequate or if clinical signs persist or
recur. Because it is difficult to differentiate treatment failure from
reinfection, the CSF should be examined, with treatment for neurosyphilis if CSF is abnormal and treatment for late latent syphilis if
CSF is normal. A minority of patients treated for early syphilis may
experience a one-dilution titer increase within 14 days after treatment; however, this early elevation does not significantly affect the
serologic outcome at 6 months after treatment. Patients treated for
late latent syphilis frequently have low initial VDRL or RPR titers
and may not have a fourfold decline after therapy with penicillin.
In such patients, re-treatment is not warranted unless the titer rises
or signs and symptoms of syphilis appear. Because treponemal tests
may remain reactive despite treatment for seropositive syphilis,
these tests are not useful in following the response to therapy.
The activity of neurosyphilis (symptomatic or asymptomatic)
correlates best with CSF pleocytosis, and this measure provides the
most sensitive index of response to treatment. Repeat CSF examinations should be performed every 6 months until the cell count is
normal. An elevated CSF cell count falls to normal in 3–12 months
in adequately treated HIV-uninfected patients. The persistence of
mild pleocytosis in HIV-infected patients may be due to the presence of HIV in CSF; this scenario may be difficult to distinguish
from treatment failure. Elevated levels of CSF protein fall more
slowly, and the CSF VDRL titer declines gradually over several
years. In patients treated for neurosyphilis, a fourfold reduction in
serum RPR titer has been positively correlated with normalization
of CSF abnormalities; this correlation is stronger in HIV-uninfected
patients and in HIV-infected patients receiving effective ART.
IMMUNITY TO SYPHILIS
The rate of development of acquired resistance to T. pallidum after natural or experimental infection depends on both the size of the infecting inoculum and the duration of infection before treatment. Both
humoral and cellular responses are important in the healing of early
lesions. Cellular infiltration, predominantly by T lymphocytes and
macrophages, produces an interferon γ–dominated cytokine milieu
and results in the clearance of organisms by activated macrophages.
Specific antibodies to surface antigens enhance phagocytosis. Antigenic variation of the TprK protein contributes to development of subsequent stages of syphilis, persistence of infection, and susceptibility
to reinfection with another strain. Comparative genomic studies have
revealed genes with sequence variations among T. pallidum strains,
leading to development of molecular typing methods used to examine
syphilis outbreaks. Recent work has demonstrated that immunization
with the outer-membrane protein Tp0751 significantly reduces dissemination of T. pallidum during syphilis infection in an animal model.
Vaccine studies with this and other antigens are underway.
■ FURTHER READING
Beale MA et al: Genomic epidemiology of syphilis reveals independent emergence of macrolide resistance across multiple circulating
lineages. Nat Commun 10:3255, 2019.
Dombrowski JC et al: Prevalence estimates of complicated syphilis.
Sex Transm Dis 42:702, 2015.
Edmondson DG et al: Long-term in vitro culture of the syphilis spirochete Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum. mBio 9:e01153, 2018.
Kenyon C et al: Repeat syphilis is more likely to be asymptomatic in HIV-infected individuals: A retrospective cohort analysis
with important implications for screening. Open Forum Infect Dis
5:ofy096, 2018.
Marra CM et al: Previous syphilis alters the course of subsequent
episodes of syphilis. Clin Infect Dis 71:1243, 2020.
The endemic treponematoses are chronic diseases that are transmitted by direct contact, usually during childhood and, like syphilis, can
cause severe late manifestations years after initial infection. These
diseases are caused by very close relatives of Treponema pallidum
subspecies pallidum, the etiologic agent of venereal syphilis (Chap.
182). Yaws, pinta, and endemic syphilis (bejel) have traditionally been
distinguished from venereal syphilis by mode of transmission, age of
acquisition, geographic distribution, and clinical features; however,
there is overlap for each of these factors. Our “knowledge” about these
infections is based on observations by health care workers who have
visited endemic areas during the past 70 years. Except for the ongoing
programs of mass drug administration (MDA) for yaws eradication
promoted by the World Health Organization (WHO), virtually no
well-designed studies of the natural history, diagnosis, or treatment of
183 Endemic Treponematoses
Sheila A. Lukehart, Lorenzo Giacani
1414 PART 5 Infectious Diseases
and persons with latent infections were treated. This campaign reduced
the prevalence of active yaws from >20% to <1% in many areas. In
subsequent decades, lack of focused surveillance and diversion of
resources resulted in documented resurgence of these infections in
some regions. Of nearly 100 countries previously endemic for yaws,
there are 15 countries with current yaws cases, and three others with
suspected cases; there are no data for the remaining countries. In
2018, a total of 80,472 suspected cases were reported, primarily from
countries in which focused yaws detection and treatment trials are
ongoing. Areas of resurgent yaws morbidity in Africa include Ivory
Coast, Ghana, Togo, Benin, Central African Republic, Nigeria, and
Democratic Republic of the Congo. The prevalence of endemic syphilis is estimated to be >10% in some regions of northern Ghana, Mali,
Niger, Burkina Faso, and Senegal, although data are scarce. In Asia
and the Pacific Islands, reports document active outbreaks of yaws in
TABLE 183-1 Comparison of the Treponemes and Associated Diseases
FEATURE VENEREAL SYPHILIS YAWS ENDEMIC SYPHILIS (BEJEL) PINTA
Organism T. pallidum subsp. pallidum T. pallidum subsp. pertenue T. pallidum subsp. endemicum T. carateum
Common modes of transmission Sexual, transplacental Skin-to-skin Mouth-to-mouth or via shared
drinking/eating utensilsa
Skin-to-skin
Usual age of acquisition Sexual maturity or in utero Early childhood Early childhood, recently
adulthood
Late childhood
Primary lesion Cutaneous ulcer (chancre) Papilloma, often ulcerative Mucosal papule, rarely seen Nonulcerating papule with
satellites, pruritic
Common location Genital, oral, anal Extremities Oral Extremities, face
Secondary lesions Cutaneous rash and
mucocutaneous lesions;
condylomata lata
Cutaneous papillomatous or
ulcerative lesions; condylomata
lata, osteoperiostitis
Mucocutaneous lesions
(mucous patch, split
papule, condylomata lata);
osteoperiostitis
Pintides, pigmented, pruritic
Infectious relapses ~25% Common Unknown Unknown
Late complications Gummas, cardiovascular
and central nervous system
involvementb
Destructive gummas of skin,
bone, cartilage
Destructive gummas of skin,
bone, cartilage
Nondestructive, dyschromic,
achromic macules
a
Sexual transmission has been recently postulated for endemic syphilis (see text). b
Central nervous system involvement and congenital infection in the endemic
treponematoses have been postulated by some investigators (see text).
Number of reported cases, 2016
≥10,000
1000-9999
<1000
Not reported since 2012
Not reported*
Countries with suspected cases
Previously endemic countries (current status unknown)
Non-endemic countries
FIGURE 183-1 Geographic distribution of yaws in 2016. *No data reported since 2008 (Timor Leste) or 2009 (Democratic Republic of Congo). (Adapted from http://www.who.
int/yaws/epidemiology/Yaws_map_2012.png?ua=1. 2016 data available at http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.NTDYAWSNUM?lang=en and http://apps.who.int/gho/
data/node.main.NTDYAWSEND?lang=en. Reprinted with permission from World Health Organization.)
these infections have been conducted. The classically defined treponemal infections are compared and contrasted in Table 183-1.
■ EPIDEMIOLOGY
Generally, yaws flourishes in moist tropical areas (Fig. 183-1); endemic
syphilis has been found primarily in arid climates of West Africa and the
Middle East; and pinta has been found in temperate foci in the Americas. Because no recent epidemiologic data are available for bejel and
pinta, the current extent of these infections as classically described is
unknown. The endemic treponematoses have traditionally been limited
to rural areas of developing nations and have been seen in developed
countries primarily among recent immigrants from endemic regions.
In a WHO-sponsored mass eradication campaign from 1952 to
1969, >160 million people in Africa, Asia, and South America were
examined for treponemal infections, and >50 million cases, contacts,
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع