1203CHAPTER 150 Diphtheria and Other Corynebacterial Infections
E. casseliflavus, have intrinsic low-level resistance to vancomycin
due to the presence of the VanC operon in the chromosome.
High-level resistance to aminoglycosides (of which gentamicin
and streptomycin are the only two tested by clinical laboratories)
abolishes the synergism observed between cell wall–active agents
and the aminoglycoside. This important phenotype is routinely
sought by the clinical laboratory in isolates from serious infections (Tables 149-1 and 149-2). Genes encoding aminoglycosidemodifying enzymes are usually the cause of high-level resistance to
these compounds and are widely disseminated among enterococci,
decreasing the options for the treatment of severe enterococcal
infections. Additionally, ribosomal methyltransferases, enzymes
that methylate rRNA and, as a consequence, disrupt the binding
site for aminoglycosides, can also lead to high-level resistance.
Resistance to daptomycin has now been well documented in both
E. faecalis and E. faecium. Daptomycin exerts its action by complexing with calcium and binding to phosphatidylglycerol in the
bacterial membrane. After binding, daptomycin forms oligomers,
with recent data suggesting that it displaces enzymes important
for cell envelope synthesis (MurG and PlsX) and that it can form
a complex with lipid II molecules critical for cell-wall synthesis,
among other effects on the membrane. Resistance to this antibiotic
in enterococci arises via two main pathways. The first involves
mutations in genes that coordinate the cell-wall and cell-membrane
stress response, most commonly a three-component system designated LiaFSR (for lipid II interfering antibiotics). These mutations
lead to activation of the system, with increased expression of an
extracellular protein known as LiaX capable of binding daptomycin
and enhancing the signaling response. In clinical isolates, mutations in LiaFSR may lead to tolerance (loss of bactericidal activity)
usually in isolates with MICs near the daptomycin breakpoint (i.e.,
3–4 mg/L). The second pathway involves changes in genes involved
in phospholipid metabolism. It is thought that mutations priming
the stress response system occur first, with the subsequent accrual
of phospholipid changes leading to a fully resistant phenotype.
Prior exposure to daptomycin has been identified as a risk factor
for the emergence of daptomycin-resistant E. faecium in cancer
patients. Resistance in the absence of exposure to the drug has also
been well described, possibly due to the similarity of this antibiotic
to antimicrobial peptides of the innate immune system. Thus, careful consideration of patient characteristics, bacterial phenotype,
and daptomycin dose is warranted, and it is advisable to obtain
infectious diseases consultation in complicated VRE infections.
The oxazolidonones (linezolid and tedizolid) act by binding to
the ribosome and inhibiting the binding of aminoacyl-tRNAs, thus
preventing protein synthesis. Resistance to this class of antibiotics
is usually due to alterations of the binding site, either via mutations
in the 23S rRNA genes or the presence of an rRNA methylase.
Since enterococci carry multiple copies of the gene encoding the
23S rRNA, prolonged exposure to oxazolidonones can select for
increasing levels of resistance by favoring propagation of the resistance allele via recombination. Changes in accessory ribosomal
proteins have also been associated with linezolid resistance and may
act to mitigate the fitness defects of mutations in the rRNA. More
concerning is the emergence of plasmid-borne resistance genes,
which can be readily transferred between enterococcal strains.
Several of these genes were first recognized in bacterial isolates of
animal origin, likely under the selective pressure of antibiotics such
as florfenicol. The cfr (chloramphenicol-florfenicol resistance) gene
encodes an rRNA methylase that modifies the 23S rRNA, leading
to increases in the MIC of linezolid. Tedizolid tends to exhibit lower
MICs in the presence of cfr; however, animal models suggest some
variants of the enzyme may compromise the activity of this drug.
Two other transmissible resistance genes, optrA and poxtA, encode
a ribosomal protection factor that has been implicated in linezolid
resistance in enterococcal strains of human and animal origin.
While still relatively rare to encounter in clinical practice, these
determinants have been identified across the globe and could be an
emerging source of resistance.
Tigecycline retains activity in the presence of typical tetracycline
resistance determinants, including drug efflux pumps and ribosomal protection factors. However, resistance has been documented
and appears to be related to changes in the S10 ribosomal protein,
which is situated near the binding site for the drug.
■ FURTHER READING
Bouza E et al: The NOVA score: A proposal to reduce the need for
transesophageal echocardiography in patients with enterococcal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 60:528, 2015.
Garcia-Solache M, Rice L: The enterococcus: A model of adaptablility to its environment. Clin Microbiol Rev 32:e00058, 2019.
Khan A et al: Antimicrobial sensing coupled with cell membrane
remodeling mediates antibiotic resistance and virulence in Enterococcus faecalis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:26925, 2019.
Lebreton F et al: Tracing the enterococci from Paleozoic origins to the
hospital. Cell 169:849, 2017.
Satlin MJ et al: Development of daptomycin susceptibility breakpoints
for Enterococcus faecium and revision of the breakpoints for other
enterococcal species by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Clin Infect Dis 70:1240, 2020.
DIPHTHERIA
Diphtheria is a nasopharyngeal and skin infection caused by Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Toxigenic strains of C. diphtheriae produce a
protein toxin that causes systemic toxicity, myocarditis, and polyneuropathy. The toxin is associated with the formation of pseudomembranes in the pharynx during respiratory diphtheria. While toxigenic
strains most frequently cause pharyngeal diphtheria, nontoxigenic
strains commonly cause cutaneous disease.
■ ETIOLOGY
C. diphtheriae is a gram-positive bacillus that is unencapsulated, nonmotile, and nonsporulating. The organism was first identified microscopically in 1883 by Klebs and a year later was isolated in pure culture
by Löffler in Robert Koch’s laboratory. The bacteria have a characteristic
club-shaped bacillary appearance and typically form clusters of parallel rays, or palisades, that are referred to as “Chinese characters.” The
specific laboratory media recommended for the cultivation of C. diphtheriae rely upon tellurite, colistin, or nalidixic acid for the organism’s
selective isolation from other autochthonous pharyngeal microbes. C.
diphtheriae may be isolated from individuals with both nontoxigenic
(tox–
) and toxigenic (tox+) phenotypes. Uchida and Pappenheimer
demonstrated that corynebacteriophage beta carries the structural gene
tox, which encodes diphtheria toxin, and that a family of closely related
corynebacteriophages are responsible for toxigenic conversion of tox– C.
diphtheriae to the tox+ phenotype. Moreover, lysogenic conversion from
a nontoxigenic to a toxigenic phenotype has been shown to occur in situ.
Growth of toxigenic strains of C. diphtheriae under iron-limiting conditions leads to the optimal expression of diphtheria toxin and is believed
to be a pathogenic mechanism during human infection. Less commonly,
diphtheria-like disease may be caused by Corynebacterium ulcerans and
Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, which express the same toxin and
are considered members of the C. diphtheriae group (discussed below).
■ EPIDEMIOLOGY
While in many regions diphtheria has been controlled in recent years
with effective vaccination, there have been sporadic outbreaks in the
150 Diphtheria and Other
Corynebacterial Infections
William R. Bishai, John R. Murphy
1204 PART 5 Infectious Diseases
United States and Europe. Diphtheria is still common in the Caribbean,
Latin America, and the Indian subcontinent, where mass immunization programs are not enforced. Large-scale epidemics of diphtheria
have occurred in the post–Soviet Union independent states. Additional
outbreaks have recently been reported in Africa and Asia. In temperate
regions, respiratory diphtheria occurs year-round but is most common
during winter months.
C. diphtheriae is transmitted via the aerosol route, usually during
close contact with an infected person. There are no significant reservoirs other than humans. The incubation period for respiratory diphtheria is 2–5 days, but disease onset has occurred as late as 10 days after
exposure. Prior to the vaccination era, most individuals over the age of
10 were immune to C. diphtheriae; infants were protected by maternal
IgG antibodies but became susceptible after ~6 months of age. Thus,
the disease primarily affected children and nonimmune young adults.
The development of diphtheria antitoxin in 1898 by von Behring
and of the diphtheria toxoid vaccine in 1924 by Ramon led to the
near-elimination of diphtheria in Western countries. The annual
incidence rate in the United States peaked in 1921, with 206,000 cases
(191 cases per 100,000) and 15,520 deaths. In contrast, since 1980,
the annual figure in the United States has been fewer than 5 cases per
100,000, with only 2 cases reported from 2004 through 2017. Nevertheless, pockets of colonization persist in North America, and groups
or individuals who resist vaccination remain at risk. Immunity to
diphtheria induced by childhood vaccination gradually decreases in
adulthood. An estimated 30% of men 60–69 years old have antitoxin
titers below the protective level. In addition to older age and lack of
vaccination, risk factors for diphtheria outbreaks include alcoholism,
low socioeconomic status, crowded living conditions, and Native
American ethnic background. An outbreak of diphtheria in Seattle,
Washington, between 1972 and 1982 comprised 1100 cases, most of
which were cutaneous. During the 1990s in the states of the former
Soviet Union, a much larger diphtheria epidemic included more than
140,000 cases and more than 4000 deaths; at its peak in 1995, more
than 50,412 cases were reported. Clonally related toxigenic C. diphtheriae strains of the ET8 complex were associated with this outbreak.
Beginning in 1998, this epidemic was controlled by mass vaccination
programs, and between 2000 and 2009 the diphtheria incidence fell by
>95%, with high-burden countries such as Latvia reporting fewer than
10 cases. During the epidemic, the incidence rate was high among individuals between 16 and 50 years of age. The epidemic was attributed
to multiple factors, including socioeconomic instability, migration,
deteriorating public health programs, unnecessary contraindications to
vaccination, low-dose vaccine formulations, frequent vaccine and antitoxin shortages, delayed implementation of vaccination and treatment
in response to cases, public mistrust, and lack of awareness.
Since 2010, significant outbreaks of diphtheria and diphtheriarelated mortality have continued to be reported from many developing countries, including the Dominican Republic, Nigeria, India,
Laos, Thailand, Indonesia, and Brazil. Statistics collected by the
World Health Organization indicated that 7321 diphtheria cases were
reported in 2014, but many more cases are likely to have gone unreported. Although 86% of the global population has been adequately
vaccinated, only 28% of countries have successfully vaccinated >80%
of individuals in all districts.
Cutaneous diphtheria is usually a secondary infection that follows
a primary skin lesion due to trauma, allergy, or autoimmunity. Most
often, these isolates lack the tox gene and thus do not express diphtheria toxin. In tropical latitudes, cutaneous diphtheria is more common
than respiratory diphtheria. In contrast to respiratory disease, cutaneous diphtheria is not reportable in the United States. Nontoxigenic
strains of C. diphtheriae have been associated with pharyngitis in
Europe, causing outbreaks among men who have sex with men and
persons who use illicit IV drugs.
■ PATHOGENESIS AND IMMUNOLOGY
Diphtheria toxin produced by tox+ strains of C. diphtheriae is the primary virulence factor in clinical disease. The toxin is synthesized in
precursor form; is released as a 535-amino-acid, single-chain protein;
and, in sensitive species (e.g., guinea pigs and humans, but not mice
or rats), has a 50% lethal dose of ~100 ng/kg of body weight. The
toxin is produced in the pseudomembranous lesion and is taken up in
the bloodstream, from which it is distributed to all organ systems in
the body. Once bound to its cell surface receptor (a heparin-binding
epidermal growth factor–like precursor), the toxin is internalized by
receptor-mediated endocytosis and enters the cytosol from an acidified
early endosomal compartment. In vitro, the toxin may be separated
into two chains by digestion with serine proteases: the N-terminal A
fragment and the C-terminal B fragment. Delivery of the A fragment
into the eukaryotic cell cytosol results in irreversible inhibition of
protein synthesis by NAD+-dependent ADP-ribosylation of elongation
factor 2. The eventual result is the death of the cell.
In 1926, Ramon at the Institut Pasteur found that formalinization
of diphtheria toxin resulted in the production of a nontoxic but highly
immunogenic diphtheria toxoid. Subsequent studies showed that
immunization with diphtheria toxoid elicited antibodies that neutralized the toxin and prevented most disease manifestations. In the 1930s,
mass immunization of children and susceptible adults with diphtheria
toxoid commenced in the United States and Europe.
Individuals with a diphtheria antitoxin titer of >0.01 U/mL are at
low risk of disease. In populations where a majority of individuals have
protective antitoxin titers, the carrier rate for toxigenic strains of C.
diphtheriae decreases and the overall risk of diphtheria among susceptible individuals is reduced. Nevertheless, individuals with nonprotective titers may contract diphtheria through either travel or exposure to
individuals who have recently returned from regions where the disease
is endemic.
Characteristic pathologic findings of diphtheria include mucosal
ulcers with a pseudomembranous coating composed of an inner band
of fibrin and a luminal band of neutrophils. Initially white and firmly
adherent, in advanced diphtheria the pseudomembranes turn gray or
even green or black as necrosis progresses. Mucosal ulcers result from
toxin-induced necrosis of the epithelium accompanied by edema,
hyperemia, and vascular congestion of the submucosal base. A significant fibrinosuppurative exudate from the ulcer develops into the
pseudomembrane. Ulcers and pseudomembranes in severe respiratory
diphtheria may extend from the pharynx into medium-sized bronchial
airways. Expanding and sloughing membranes may result in fatal airway obstruction.
APPROACH TO THE PATIENT
Diphtheria
Diphtheria, although rare in the United States and other developed
countries, should be considered when a patient has severe pharyngitis, particularly when there is difficulty swallowing, respiratory
compromise, or signs of systemic disease (e.g., myocarditis or generalized weakness). The leading causes of pharyngitis are respiratory viruses (rhinoviruses, influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses,
coronaviruses, adenoviruses; ~25% of cases), group A streptococci
(15–30%), group C streptococci (~5%), atypical bacteria such as
Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae (15–20% in
some series), and other viruses such as herpes simplex virus (~4%)
and Epstein-Barr virus (<1% in infectious mononucleosis). Less
common causes are acute HIV infection, gonorrhea, fusobacterial infection (e.g., Lemierre’s syndrome), thrush due to Candida
albicans or other Candida species, and diphtheria. The presence
of a pharyngeal pseudomembrane or an extensive exudate should
prompt consideration of diphtheria (Fig. 150-1).
■ CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
Respiratory Diphtheria The clinical diagnosis of diphtheria is
based on the constellation of sore throat; adherent tonsillar, pharyngeal, or nasal pseudomembranous lesions; and low-grade fever.
In addition, diagnosis requires the isolation of C. diphtheriae or histopathologic isolation of compatible gram-positive organisms. The
1205CHAPTER 150 Diphtheria and Other Corynebacterial Infections
FIGURE 150-1 Respiratory diphtheria due to toxigenic C. diphtheriae producing
exudative pharyngitis in a child displaying a pseudomembrane extending from
the uvula to the pharyngeal wall. The characteristic white pseudomembrane is
caused by diphtheria toxin–mediated necrosis of the respiratory epithelial layer,
producing a fibrinous coagulative exudate. Submucosal edema adds to airway
narrowing. The pharyngitis is acute in onset, and respiratory obstruction from the
pseudomembrane may occur in severe cases. Inoculation of pseudomembrane
fragments or submembranous swabs onto Löffler’s or tellurite selective medium
reveals C. diphtheriae. (Photograph courtesy of the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and Immunization Action Coalition, used by permission.)
FIGURE 150-2 Cutaneous diphtheria due to nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae on the
lower extremity. (From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public
Health Image Library [PHIL]. #1941.)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recognizes confirmed respiratory diphtheria (laboratory proven or epidemiologically
linked to a culture-confirmed case) and probable respiratory diphtheria
(clinically compatible but not laboratory proven or epidemiologically
linked). Carriers are defined as individuals who have positive cultures
for C. diphtheriae and who either are asymptomatic or have symptoms
but lack pseudomembranes. Most patients seek medical care for sore
throat and fever several days into the illness. Occasionally, weakness,
dysphagia, headache, and voice change are the initial manifestations.
Neck edema and difficulty breathing are evident in more advanced
cases and carry a poor prognosis.
The systemic manifestations of diphtheria stem from the effects of
diphtheria toxin and include weakness as a result of neurotoxicity and
cardiac arrhythmias or congestive heart failure due to myocarditis.
Most commonly, the pseudomembranous lesion is located in the tonsillopharyngeal region. Less commonly, the lesions are located in the
larynx, nares, and trachea or bronchial passages. Large pseudomembranes are associated with severe disease and a poor prognosis. A few
patients develop massive swelling of the tonsils and present with “bullneck” diphtheria, which results from edema of the submandibular and
paratracheal region and is further characterized by foul breath, thick
speech, and stridorous breathing. The diphtheritic pseudomembrane
is gray or whitish and sharply demarcated. Unlike the exudative lesion
associated with streptococcal pharyngitis, the pseudomembrane in
diphtheria is tightly adherent to the underlying tissues. Attempts to dislodge the membrane may cause bleeding. Hoarseness suggests laryngeal diphtheria, in which laryngoscopy may be diagnostically helpful.
Cutaneous Diphtheria This dermatosis is characterized by punched-out ulcerative lesions with necrotic sloughing or
pseudomembrane formation (Fig. 150-2). The diagnosis requires cultivation of C. diphtheriae from lesions, which most commonly occur on
the lower and upper extremities, head, and trunk.
Infections Due to Non-diphtheriae Corynebacterium Species
and Nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae Non-diphtheriae species of
Corynebacterium and related genera (discussed below) as well as nontoxigenic strains of C. diphtheriae itself have been found in bloodstream
and respiratory infections, often in individuals with immunosuppression or chronic respiratory disease. These organisms can cause disease
manifestations and should not necessarily be dismissed as colonizers.
Other Clinical Manifestations C. diphtheriae causes rare cases
of endocarditis and septic arthritis, most often in patients with preexisting risk factors, such as abnormal cardiac valves, injection drug use,
or cirrhosis.
■ COMPLICATIONS
Airway obstruction poses a significant early risk in patients presenting
with advanced diphtheria. Pseudomembranes may slough and obstruct
the airway or may advance to the larynx or into the tracheobronchial
tree. Children are particularly prone to obstruction because of their
small airways.
Polyneuropathy and myocarditis are late toxic manifestations of
diphtheria. During a diphtheria outbreak in the Kyrgyz Republic in
1999, myocarditis was found in 22% and neuropathy in 5% of 676
hospitalized patients. The mortality rate was 7% among patients
with myocarditis as opposed to 2% among those without myocardial
manifestations. The median time to death in hospitalized patients was
4.5 days. Myocarditis is typically associated with arrhythmias and
dilated cardiomyopathy.
Polyneuropathy is seen 3–5 weeks after the onset of diphtheria and
has a slow indolent course. However, patients may develop severe and
prolonged neurologic abnormalities. The disorders typically occur in
the mouth and neck, with lingual or facial numbness as well as dysphonia, dysphagia, and cranial nerve paresthesias. More ominous signs
include weakness of respiratory and abdominal muscles and paresis
of the extremities. Sensory manifestations and sensory ataxia also are
observed. Cranial nerve dysfunction typically precedes disturbances of
the trunk and extremities because of proximity to the site of infection.
Autonomic dysfunction also is associated with polyneuropathy and can
lead to hypotension. Polyneuropathy is typically reversible in patients
who survive the acute phase.
Other complications of diphtheria include pneumonia, renal failure,
encephalitis, cerebral infarction, pulmonary embolism, and serum
sickness from antitoxin therapy.
1206 PART 5 Infectious Diseases
■ DIAGNOSIS
The diagnosis of diphtheria is based on clinical signs and symptoms
plus laboratory confirmation. Respiratory diphtheria should be considered in patients with sore throat, pharyngeal exudates, and fever.
Other symptoms may include hoarseness, stridor, or palatal paralysis.
The presence of a pseudomembrane should prompt strong consideration of diphtheria. Once a clinical diagnosis of diphtheria is made,
diphtheria antitoxin should be obtained and administered as rapidly
as possible.
Laboratory diagnosis of diphtheria is based either on cultivation of
C. diphtheriae or toxigenic C. ulcerans from the site of infection or on
the demonstration of local lesions with characteristic histopathology.
Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum, a nontoxigenic organism, is
a common component of the normal throat flora and does not pose a
significant risk. Throat samples should be submitted to the laboratory
for culture with the notation that diphtheria is being considered. This
information should prompt cultivation on special selective medium
and subsequent biochemical testing to differentiate C. diphtheriae
from other nasopharyngeal commensal corynebacteria. All laboratory
isolates of C. diphtheriae, including nontoxigenic strains, should be
submitted to the CDC.
A diagnosis of cutaneous diphtheria requires laboratory confirmation since the lesions are not characteristic and are indistinguishable
from other dermatoses. Diphtheritic ulcers occasionally—but not
consistently—have a punched-out appearance (Fig. 150-2). Patients in
whom cutaneous diphtheria is identified should have the nasopharynx
cultured for C. diphtheriae. The laboratory medium for cutaneous
diphtheria specimens is the same as that used for respiratory diphtheria: Löffler’s or Tinsdale’s selective medium in addition to nonselective medium such as blood agar. As has been mentioned, respiratory
diphtheria remains a notifiable disease in the United States, whereas
cutaneous diphtheria is not.
TREATMENT
Diphtheria
DIPHTHERIA ANTITOXIN
Prompt administration of diphtheria antitoxin is critical in the
management of respiratory diphtheria. Diphtheria antitoxin, a
horse antiserum, is effective in reducing the extent of local disease
as well as the risk of complications of myocarditis and neuropathy.
Rapid institution of antitoxin therapy is also associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk. Because diphtheria antitoxin
cannot neutralize cell-bound toxin, prompt initiation is important.
This product, which is no longer commercially available in the
United States, can be obtained from the CDC Emergency Operations Center at 770-488-7100 (website: www.cdc.gov/diphtheria/dat
.html) after first contacting the state health department. The current
protocol for the use of diphtheria antitoxin involves a test dose to
rule out immediate hypersensitivity. Patients who demonstrate
hypersensitivity require desensitization before a full therapeutic
dose of antitoxin is administered.
Given that the world supply of equine anti–diphtheria toxin
is limited, a human monoclonal antibody with the potential to
provide a safer alternative to equine antitoxin therapy is being
developed.
ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY
Antibiotics are used in the management of diphtheria primarily
to prevent transmission to susceptible contacts. Antibiotics also
prevent further toxin production and reduce the severity of local
infection. Recommended treatment options for patients with respiratory diphtheria are as follows:
• Erythromycin, 500 mg IV q6h (for children: 40–50 mg/kg
per day IV in two or four divided doses) until the patient can
swallow comfortably; then 500 mg PO qid to complete a 14-day
course
• Procaine penicillin G, 600,000 U IM q12h (for children: 12,500–
25,000 U/kg IM q12h) until the patient can swallow comfortably;
then oral penicillin V, 125–250 mg qid to complete a 14-day
course
A clinical study in Vietnam found that penicillin was associated
with a more rapid resolution of fever and a lower rate of bacterial
resistance than erythromycin; however, relapses were more common in the penicillin group. Erythromycin therapy targets protein
synthesis and thus offers the presumed benefit of stopping toxin
synthesis more quickly than a cell wall–active β-lactam agent.
Alternative therapeutic agents for patients who are allergic to penicillin or cannot take erythromycin include rifampin and clindamycin. Other reasonable antibiotics are clarithromycin, azithromycin,
linezolid, and vancomycin, although they have not been studied in
comparison to the agents above.
Eradication of C. diphtheriae should be documented after antimicrobial therapy is complete. A repeat throat culture 2 weeks
later is recommended. For patients in whom the organism is not
eradicated after a 14-day course of erythromycin or penicillin,
an additional 10-day course followed by repeat culture is recommended. Drug-resistant strains of C. diphtheriae exist, and several
reports have described multidrug-resistant strains, predominantly
in Southeast Asia. Drug resistance should be considered when
efforts at pathogen eradication fail.
Cutaneous diphtheria should be treated as described above
for respiratory disease. Individuals infected with toxigenic strains
should receive antitoxin. It is important to treat the underlying
cause of the dermatoses in addition to the superinfection with
C. diphtheriae.
Patients who recover from respiratory or cutaneous diphtheria
should have antitoxin levels measured. If diphtheria antitoxin has
been administered, this test should be performed 6 months later.
Patients who recover from respiratory or cutaneous diphtheria
should receive the appropriate vaccine to ensure the development
of protective antibody titers.
MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
Patients in whom diphtheria is suspected should be hospitalized
in respiratory isolation rooms, with close monitoring of cardiac
and respiratory function. A cardiac workup is recommended to
assess the possibility of myocarditis. In patients with extensive
pseudomembranes, an anesthesiology or an ear, nose, and throat
consultation is recommended because of the possible need for tracheostomy or intubation. In some settings, pseudomembranes can
be removed surgically. Treatment with glucocorticoids has not been
shown to reduce the risk of myocarditis or polyneuropathy.
■ PROGNOSIS
The mortality rate for diphtheria is 5–10% but may approach 20%
among children <5 years old and adults >40 years of age. Fatal
pseudomembranous diphtheria typically occurs in patients with
nonprotective antibody titers and in unimmunized patients. The
pseudomembrane may actually increase in size from the time it is first
noted. Risk factors for death include bullneck diphtheria; myocarditis
with ventricular tachycardia; atrial fibrillation; complete heart block;
an age of >60 years or <6 months; alcoholism; extensive pseudomembrane elongation; and laryngeal, tracheal, or bronchial involvement.
Another important predictor of fatal outcome is the interval between
the onset of local disease and the administration of antitoxin. Cutaneous diphtheria has a low mortality rate and is rarely associated with
myocarditis or peripheral neuropathy.
■ PREVENTION
Vaccination Sustained campaigns for vaccination of children and
adequate boosting vaccination of adults are responsible for the exceedingly low incidence of diphtheria in most developed nations. Currently,
diphtheria toxoid vaccine is coadministered with tetanus vaccine (with
or without acellular pertussis). DTaP (full-level diphtheria toxoid,
1207CHAPTER 150 Diphtheria and Other Corynebacterial Infections
tetanus toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine) is currently recommended for children up to the age of 6; DTaP replaced the earlier
whole-cell pertussis vaccine DTP in 1997. Tdap is a tetanus toxoid,
reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine formulated
for adolescents and adults. Tdap was licensed for use in the United
States in 2005 and is recommended for children ≥7 years old and for
adults. It is recommended that all adults (i.e., persons >19 years old)
receive a single dose of Tdap if they have not received it previously,
regardless of the interval since the last dose of Td (tetanus and reduceddose diphtheria toxoids, adsorbed). Tdap vaccination is a priority for
health care workers, pregnant women, adults anticipating contact with
infants, and adults not previously vaccinated for pertussis. Adults who
have received acellular pertussis vaccine should continue to receive
decennial Td booster vaccinations. The vaccine schedule is detailed
in Chap. 123.
Prophylaxis Administration to Contacts Close contacts
of diphtheria patients should undergo throat culture to determine
whether they are carriers. After samples for throat culture are obtained,
antimicrobial prophylaxis should be considered for all contacts, even
those whose cultures are negative. The options are 7–10 days of oral
erythromycin or one dose of IM benzathine penicillin G (1.2 million
units for persons ≥6 years of age or 600,000 units for children <6 years
of age).
Contacts of diphtheria patients whose immunization status is
uncertain should receive the appropriate diphtheria toxoid–containing
vaccine. The Tdap vaccine (rather than Td) is now the booster vaccine
of choice for adults who have not recently received an acellular pertussis–containing vaccine. Carriers of C. diphtheriae in the community
should be treated and vaccinated when identified.
OTHER CORYNEBACTERIAL AND
RHODOCOCCUS INFECTIONS
Nondiphtherial corynebacteria, referred to as diphtheroids or coryneforms, are frequently considered colonizers or contaminants; however,
they have been associated with invasive disease, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Importantly, even though they are termed
nondiphtherial corynebacteria, C. ulcerans and C. pseudotuberculosis
may produce diphtheria toxin and therefore cause severe human
illness. These organisms have been isolated from the bloodstream,
especially in association with catheter infection, endocarditis, prosthetic valve infection, meningitis, brain abscess, osteomyelitis, and
peritonitis. Risk factors include indwelling intravenous or peritoneal
catheters and neurosurgical shunts. Patients infected with these organisms are often immunosuppressed or have significant medical comorbidities. The nondiphtherial coryneforms are a collection of bacteria
that are taxonomically grouped together in the genus Corynebacterium
on the basis of their 16S rDNA signature nucleotides. Despite the
shared rDNA signatures, these isolates are quite diverse. For example, their guanine-cytosine content ranges from 45 to 70%. Several
nondiphtheroid corynebacteria, including Corynebacterium jeikeium
and Corynebacterium urealyticum, are associated with resistance to
multiple antibiotics. Rhodococcus equi is associated with necrotizing
pneumonia and granulomatous infection, particularly in immunocompromised individuals.
■ MICROBIOLOGY AND LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS
These organisms are non-acid-fast, catalase-positive, aerobic or facultatively anaerobic rods. Their colonial morphologies on blood agar
vary widely; some species are small and α-hemolytic (similar to lactobacilli), whereas others form large white colonies (similar to yeasts).
Many nondiphtherial coryneforms require special media, such as
Löffler’s, Tinsdale’s, or tellurite medium. These cultivation idiosyncrasies have led to a complex taxonomic categorization of the organisms.
■ EPIDEMIOLOGY
Humans are the natural reservoirs for several nondiphtherial coryneforms, including C. xerosis, C. pseudodiphtheriticum, C. striatum,
C. minutissimum, C. jeikeium, C. urealyticum, and Arcanobacterium
haemolyticum. Animal reservoirs including milk are responsible for
carriage of C. ulcerans and C. pseudotuberculosis. Soil is the natural
reservoir for R. equi.
■ CLINCAL MANIFESTATIONS
C. ulcerans This organism causes a diphtheria-like illness and produces both diphtheria toxin and a dermonecrotic toxin. The organism
is a commensal in horses and cattle and has been isolated from cow’s
milk. In contrast to diphtheria, this infection is considered a zoonosis,
and cases have been traced to contact with animal carriers, including
dogs and pigs. C. ulcerans causes exudative pharyngitis, primarily during summer months, in rural areas, and among individuals exposed to
animals. Treatment with antitoxin and antibiotics should be initiated
when respiratory C. ulcerans is identified, and a contact investigation
(including throat cultures to determine the need for antimicrobial prophylaxis and, in unimmunized contacts, administration of the appropriate diphtheria toxoid–containing vaccine) should be conducted.
The organism grows on Löffler’s, Tinsdale’s, and tellurite agars as well
as blood agar. In addition to exudative pharyngitis, cutaneous disease
due to C. ulcerans has been reported. C. ulcerans is susceptible to a wide
panel of antibiotics. Erythromycin and other macrolides appear to be
the first-line agents.
C. pseudotuberculosis Infection caused by C. pseudotuberculosis
is an important animal pathogen (most notably of sheep) that rarely
causes human disease. C. pseudotuberculosis causes suppurative granulomatous lymphadenitis and an eosinophilic pneumonia syndrome
among individuals who handle sheep; horses, cattle, goats, deer, and
raw milk also have been implicated. Surgical excision of affected lymph
nodes should be performed when feasible, and successful treatment
with erythromycin or tetracycline has been reported. Some strains
express diphtheria toxin and produce a diphtheria-like disease, which
should be treated with antitoxin.
C. jeikeium (Group JK) Originally described in American hospitals, C. jeikeium infection was subsequently reported in Europe. After a
1976 survey of diseases caused by nondiphtherial corynebacteria, CDC
group JK emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen among
neutropenic and HIV-infected patients. The organism has now been
designated a separate species. C. jeikeium forms small, gray to white,
glistening, nonhemolytic colonies on blood agar. It lacks urease and
nitrate reductase and does not ferment most carbohydrates. The predominant syndrome associated with C. jeikeium is sepsis, sometimes
with associated pneumonia, endocarditis, meningitis, osteomyelitis, or
epidural abscess. Risk factors for C. jeikeium infection include hematologic malignancy, neutropenia from comorbid conditions, prolonged
hospitalization, exposure to multiple antibiotics, and skin disruption.
There is evidence that C. jeikeium is part of the inguinal, axillary, genital, and perirectal flora of hospitalized patients.
Broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy appears to select for colonization. The organisms appear as gram-positive coccobacillary forms
slightly resembling streptococci. C. jeikeium is resistant to the majority
of antibiotic classes except oxazolidinones (e.g., linezolid) and glycopeptides (e.g., vancomycin). Effective therapy involves removal of the
infectious source, whether a catheter, prosthetic joint, or prosthetic
valve. Efforts have been made to prevent C. jeikeium infection with
strict institution of infection control protocols for high-risk patients,
particularly those in intensive care units.
C. urealyticum (Group D2) Identified as a urease-positive
nondiphtherial Corynebacterium in 1972, C. urealyticum is an opportunistic pathogen causing sepsis and urinary tract infection. C. urealyticum appears to be the etiologic agent of a severe urinary tract
syndrome known as alkaline-encrusted cystitis, a chronic inflammatory
bladder infection associated with deposition of ammonium magnesium phosphate on the surface and walls of ulcerating lesions in the
bladder. In addition, C. urealyticum has been associated with pneumonia, peritonitis, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and wound infection.
It is similar to C. jeikeium in its resistance to most antibiotics except
oxazolidinones and glycopeptides. Vancomycin therapy has been used
successfully in severe infections.
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع