1854 PART 6 Disorders of the Cardiovascular System
very large effusions. In patients with suspected pericardial effusion or
tamponade, echocardiography can usually be performed rapidly, at the
bedside, and even by operators with limited skill. The distance from
the parietal to the visceral pericardial layer can be measured, and when
this exceeds ~1 cm, an effusion is considered significant. Echocardiographic features suggestive of tamponade include diastolic collapse of
the right ventricular free wall, suggestive of pericardial pressures that
exceed right ventricular filling pressures, and Doppler evidence of
respiratory flow variation, which is the Doppler equivalent of pulsus
paradoxus. Despite the benefits of echocardiography in suspected
pericardial tamponade, the diagnosis of tamponade remains a clinical
diagnosis, and other important features, such as patient’s blood pressure in the presence of pulsus paradoxus, need to be taken into account
when considering therapeutic options.
Chronic inflammation of the pericardium leads to thickening and
calcification of the parietal pericardium, resulting in pericardial constriction in which diastolic filling can be severely impaired. In these
cases, filling of the ventricles comes to an abrupt halt when the volume
of ventricular filling is impaired by the constricting pericardium.
Assessment of pericardial thickness in these patients is important, but
it is just as important to note that approximately one in five patients
with severe pericardial constriction have no significant pericardial
thickening by imaging or at surgery. Thus, a lack of thickened pericardium does not rule out pericardial constriction, and patients’ signs and
symptomatology and physiologic evidence of constriction should be
assessed independently. Pericardial constriction typically demonstrates
marked respiratory changes in diastolic flow on Doppler echocardiography, in contrast to restrictive cardiomyopathy, but substantial overlap
exists. CT and CMR offer tomographic, whole-heart assessment of
pericardial thickening and other anatomy abnormalities in pericardial
constriction, such as enlarged atria, vena cavas, and pleural and pericardial effusions (Figs. 241-33 and 241-34 and Videos 241-8 and 241-9).
CMR offers the additional information of pericardial fibrosis and
inflammation by LGE imaging and evidence of constrictive physiology
(e.g., regional relaxation concordance due to myocardial adhesions,
abnormal septal bounce with Valsalva maneuver) (Fig. 241-34).
■ CARDIAC THROMBUS AND MASS
Echocardiography is usually the modality that first detects a cardiac
mass with differential diagnoses including thrombus, tumor, or vegetation. Given their unrestricted tomographic views and multiplanar
three-dimensional imaging, CMR and CT can complement echocardiography by further characterizing the physical features of the cardiac
mass. Compared to CT, CMR has the advantage of higher tissue contrast differentiation, more robust cine imaging, and the use of multifaceted techniques within the same imaging session to determine the
physiologic characteristics of the mass. Gadolinium contrast enhancement patterns of increased capillary perfusion can detect vascularity
within a mass, which differentiates a tumor from a thrombus. Structures that are known to mimic a cardiac mass include (1) anatomic
variants, such as the Eustachian valve, Chiari network, crista sagittalis
or terminalis, and the right ventricular moderator band, and (2) “pseudotumors,” such as interatrial septal aneurysm, coronary or aortic
aneurysm, lipomatous hypertrophy of interatrial septum, hiatal hernia,
or a catheter/pacemaker lead. Coexisting abnormalities that raise the
likelihood of a cardiac thrombus (Fig. 241-35) include regional wall
motion abnormality from an infarction or ventricular aneurysm, atrial
fibrillation leading to slow flow in the left atrial appendage, or presence of venous catheters or recent endovascular injury. CMR has the
advantage of being able to assess regional wall motion and infarction or
ventricular aneurysm in matching scan planes, adjacent to the cardiac
thrombus, using cine and LGE imaging, respectively. For ventricular
thrombus, gadolinium-enhanced LGE imaging can detect thrombus at
a higher sensitivity than echocardiography by depicting high-contrast
difference between the dark thrombus and its adjacent structures and
by imaging in three dimensions. In addition, mural thrombus does not
enhance on first-pass perfusion and often has a characteristic “etched”
appearance (black border surrounding a bright center) on LGE
imaging, thus providing higher diagnostic specificity than anatomic
information alone (Fig. 241-36). Comparing the signal intensities of
a mass before and after contrast injection may confirm the lack of
tissue vascularity (i.e., thrombus) by the lack of signal enhancement
after contrast administration. Like intracardiac thrombus, regions
of microvascular obstruction also appear dark, but microvascular
obstruction is confined within the myocardium and surrounded by
infarction and thus can be differentiated from intracardiac thrombus.
Cardiac CT imaging is ideally suited for small thrombus in the left
atrial appendage, especially in cases where transesophageal echocardiography is suboptimal or not feasible.
The majority of cardiac malignancy is metastatic, which is about
twentyfold more common than primary cardiac malignancies. Metastasis to the heart can be the result of direct invasion (e.g., lung and breast),
lymphatic spread (e.g., lymphomas and melanomas), or hematogenous
spread (e.g., renal cell carcinoma). Primary benign cardiac tumors are
seen mostly in children and young adults and include atrial myxoma,
rhabdomyoma, fibroma, and endocardial fibroelastoma (Fig. 241-37).
Atrial myxomas are often seen as a round or multilobar mass in the
left atrium (75%), right atrium (20%), or ventricles or mixed chambers
(5%). They typically have inhomogeneous brightness in the center
on cine steady-state free precession imaging due to their gelatinous
FIGURE 241-32 Pericardial effusion with tamponade physiology. The right ventricle
(arrow) is small and collapsing in end diastole due to increased pericardial pressure.
FIGURE 241-33 A female patient developed pericardial constriction and right
heart failure, secondary to radiation therapy for breast cancer. Note the multiple
pericardial adhesions (red arrows).
Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging: Echocardiography, Nuclear Cardiology, and Magnetic Resonance/Computed Tomography Imaging
1855CHAPTER 241
contents and may have a pedunculated attachment to the fossa ovalis.
Primary malignant cardiac tumors are rare and may include angiosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and liposarcoma.
■ ROLE OF IMAGING IN INFECTIOUS AND
INFLAMMATORY DISEASE
Patients with suspected endocarditis often undergo echocardiography
for the purpose of identifying vegetations or intramyocardial abscesses.
Vegetations are generally highly mobile structures that most typically
are attached to valves or present in areas of the heart with turbulent
flow. The absence of a vegetation on echocardiography does not rule
out endocarditis, because small vegetations below the resolution of the
imaging techniques can be present. Echocardiography remains the best
technique for assessment of vegetations because its high temporal resolution allows visualization of the typical oscillating motion, although
large vegetations can be visualized with other techniques (Fig. 241-38).
The size and location of a vegetation do not necessarily provide any
specific information about the type of infection. Abscesses, particularly around the aortic and mitral annuli, are particularly concerning
in patients with endocarditis and should be suspected in patients
C D
A B
E F
G H I
FIGURE 241-34 Representative cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and CT features of pericardial disease. A. Four-chamber late gadolinium enhanced image showing
severe, diffuse enhancement of both the visceral (arrowheads) and parietal (arrows) layers of the pericardium. The black signal between the two layers represents effusion.
B. Axial T2-weighted image showing severe thickening and increased signal of both the visceral (arrowheads) and parietal (arrows) layers of the pericardium. C. Fourchamber steady-state free precession (bright-blood) image in early diastole showing the apical interventricular septum bowed to the left (white arrowhead) due to the
increased right-sided ventricular volume at the expense of the left ventricular volume. Dilated atria (white arrows) are also a feature of constriction. D. Axial T1-weighted
double inversion recovery (black-blood) image showing increased thickness of the pericardium >4 mm (black arrowhead). E. Four-chamber late gadolinium enhanced image
showing diffuse enhancement of the thickened pericardium (white arrows). F. Axial steady-state free precession (bright-blood) image showing dilated inferior vena cava
(IVC) (white arrowheads), which is greater than twice the size of the normal aorta (white arrow). Under normal conditions, the IVC should be similar in size to the aorta.
G. Lateral chest radiograph showing calcification of the pericardium anteriorly (arrows). H. Corresponding sagittal view from computed tomography angiography (CTA)
showing the calcified pericardium (arrowheads). I. Three-dimensional rendered segmented image from the CTA showing the extent of the pericardial calcification. (Images
courtesy of Dr. Michael Steigner, Brigham and Women’s Hospital.)
1856 PART 6 Disorders of the Cardiovascular System
FIGURE 241-35 Cardiac thrombus (arrow) in an apical aneurysmal region following
acute myocardial infarction.
*
FIGURE 241-36 Late gadolinium enhancement image of a massive anterior
infarction complicated by a dyskinetic left ventricular aneurysm and intracavitary
thrombus (red asterisk).
*
FIGURE 241-37 A case of a cardiac fibroma. A patient presented with shortness of breath and was found to have a large myocardial mass on echocardiography. Cine
cardiac magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the large myocardial mass involving the anterolateral wall. Shortly after gadolinium contrast was injected, the myocardial
mass demonstrated intense accumulation of contrast on late gadolinium enhancement imaging (right panel, asterisk). This is a case of cardiac fibroma. The patient also has
gingival hyperplasia and bifid thoracic ribs, a part of the rare Gorlin’s syndrome.
with prolongation of cardiac intervals in the setting of endocarditis.
Visualization of both vegetations and possible abscesses is best done
with transesophageal echocardiography, particularly in patients with
prosthetic valves. Indeed, transesophageal echocardiography is the first
test of choice in a patient with a mechanical mitral or aortic valve and
suspected endocarditis (Fig. 241-38). Vegetations should be measured
because their size has prognostic importance and can be used to decide
whether a patient should be taken to surgery.
PET metabolic imaging is emerging as a potentially useful imaging
technique to identify the source of infection in patients with prosthetic
valves, vascular grafts, and implantable pacemakers/defibrillators,
especially in patients in whom echocardiography and/or blood cultures
are negative. There is an emerging literature documenting the potential
value of macrophage-targeted metabolic imaging with 18F-FDG and
PET (Fig. 241-39). Likewise, FDG PET is also useful to identify vascular inflammation and monitor the response to immunosuppressive
therapy (Fig. 241-40).
■ EVALUATION OF COMMON CONGENITAL
ABNORMALITIES IN THE ADULT
While a discussion of complex congenital heart disease is beyond the
scope of this chapter, several common congenital abnormalities are
present in adults, and cardiac imaging is essential to diagnosing and
managing these conditions. Abnormalities of the interatrial septum
probably represent the most common adult congenital cardiac abnormalities. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) can be identified in almost 25%
of patients. In patients with PFO, a one-way flap in the region of the
fossa ovalis is normally kept closed by the left atrial pressure, which
is generally higher than right atrial pressure for much of the cardiac
cycle. However, right-to-left flow through a PFO can occur any time
the right atrial pressure exceeds the left atrial pressure, including with
maneuvers or conditions in which intrathoracic pressure is increased.
The presence of a PFO can increase the likelihood of the paradoxical embolus, and thus the presence of a PFO should be determined
in patients with stroke or systemic embolus of unknown etiology.
Because the one-way flap of the PFO will be closed during much of
the cardiac cycle, color flow Doppler will usually not reveal a PFO.
Instead, agitated saline (bubble study) is the best way to assess for PFO
or atrial septal defect. Saline is agitated and injected peripherally and
then enters the right atrium. If no shunt is present, only the right side
of the heart will be pacified because the air bubbles will be too small to
traverse the lungs. Because PFO is a one-way flap, maneuvers should
be used to temporarily increase right atrial pressure. Either a Valsalva
maneuver or sniff maneuver can be effective.
Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging: Echocardiography, Nuclear Cardiology, and Magnetic Resonance/Computed Tomography Imaging
1857CHAPTER 241
LA
LV
LA
LV
FIGURE 241-38 Vegetation on native mitral valve (left panel, arrow). Left atrium (LA) and left ventricle (LV) are indicated. Middle panel shows a vegetation on a mechanical
prosthesis (St. Jude) indicated by an arrow; right panel shows vegetation on prosthesis after excision.
FIGURE 241-41 Large secundum-type atrial septal defect (arrow) noted in the subcostal view with color flow Doppler showing flow through the defect (right).
CT
Before
treatment
After
treatment
FDG PET PET/CT fusion
L
A
P
R
FIGURE 241-39 Representative cross-sectional computed tomography (CT; left), fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET; middle), and fused CT
and PET (right) images before and after antibiotic treatment in a patient with fever and suspected infection of the stent placed in the descending portion of the aortic arch
(arrow) for treatment of aortic coarctation. The FDG images before treatment demonstrate intense glucose uptake within the stent, consistent with inflammation/infection.
The lower panel demonstrates significant attenuation of the FDG signal after treatment. (Images used with permission from Dr. Sharmila Dorbala, Brigham and Women’s
Hospital.)
CTA PET PET/CT fusion
Ao Ao
Ao LV LV
LV
FIGURE 241-40 Representative coronal computed tomography (CT) angiographic (CTA; left panel), fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET; middle
panel), and fused CT and PET (right panel) images in a patient with suspected aortitis. The CTA images demonstrate thickening of the ascending aorta (Ao), which
correlates with intense, focal FDG uptake consistent with active inflammation. LV, left ventricle.
1858 PART 6 Disorders of the Cardiovascular System
0
–50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
ms 0 10 20 30 40 50
Flow volume
A B
C
60 70 80
Main pulmonary artery
Ascending aorta
90 100
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950
Time |ms|
FIGURE 241-42 A and B are phase contrast images that display blood flow (phase images on A) and anatomy (structural images on B) of the aorta (red) and pulmonary
artery (green). C demonstrates the flow curves of the aorta (red) and the pulmonary artery (green). Note that the total flow (area under the curve) was substantially higher
in the pulmonary artery than the aorta, indicative of a marked elevated pulmonary-to-systemic shunt ratio, as a result of the partial anomalous pulmonary venous return that
drained into the superior vena cava.
Atrial septal defects occur most commonly in the region of the fossa
ovalis, referred to as secundum-type defects (Fig. 241-41). Additional
atrial septal defects include defects of the sinus venosus and atrium
primum. Color flow Doppler echocardiography is usually sufficient for
diagnosis of a secundum-type atrial septal defect, but agitated saline is
generally needed for the diagnosis of other types of atrial septal defects.
Ventricular septal defects can generally be visualized by color flow
Doppler as turbulent high-velocity jets from the left to the right ventricle. In cases where the jet origin is unclear, continuous wave Doppler
can estimate the velocities. These would be expected to be extremely
high to reflect the pressure gradient between the left and right ventricles. Defects can occur in both the muscular and membranous portions
of the ventricular septum.
In patients with either atrial or ventricular septal defects, estimation of the severity of the left-to-right shunt is essential and can be an
important determinant in management decisions. Shunts are generally
assessed by echocardiography by assessing the relationship between
pulmonary flow and aortic flow, the Qp/Qs ratio. Shunts and cardiac
anatomy of most congenital heart diseases can also be accurately evaluated by CMR (Fig. 241-42).
■ FURTHER READING
Di Carli MF et al: The future of cardiovascular imaging. Circulation
133:2640, 2016.
VIDEO 241-1 Cine steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging (left) in short axis
in a patient who had a large anterior myocardial infarction. Only one cut of a stack
of short axis is shown. This method allows quantification of left ventricular (LV)
and right ventricular (RV) volumes in diastole and systole and calculation of the LV
ejection fraction, stroke volumes, and cardiac output (a product of LV stroke volume
and heart rate). Note that in this case there is anterior and anteroseptal akinesia
(lack of systolic wall thickening, as shown by the left cine movie, red arrows)
matching by a near-transmural myocardial infarction as seen by the matching late
gadolinium enhancement (LGE) image (right picture, white arrows).
Johnson NP et al: Invasive FFR and noninvasive CFR in the evaluation of ischemia: What is the future? J Am Coll Cardiol 67:2772,
2016.
Naoum C et al: Cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of mitral and tricuspid valve disease:
Implications for transcatheter interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10:pii:e005331, 2017.
Solomon SD et al: Essential Echocardiography, a Companion to
Braunwald’s Heart Disease. Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2018.
Steel KE, Kwong RY: Application of cardiac magnetic resonance
imaging in cardiomyopathy. Curr Heart Fail Rep 5:128, 2008.
Vandoorne K, Nahrendorf M: Multiparametric imaging of
organ system interfaces. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10:pii:e005613,
2017.
Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization and Coronary Angiography
1859CHAPTER 242
VIDEO 241-2 This is cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging of a
patient in the long-axis four-chamber view. Note that the basal aspect of the right
ventricular (RV) free wall is thickened, aneurysmal, and akinetic (red arrows). The
global RV systolic function is mildly reduced, and the RV is dilated. CMR can image
the RV using tomographic views and can quantify the RV volumes and ejection
fraction volumetrically. This is a patient who presented with syncopal spells and
inducible ventricular tachycardia on subsequent workup. He was diagnosed to have
arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia.
VIDEO 241-4 The video shows cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial
perfusion imaging during vasodilating stress, in three parallel short-axis views.
A bolus of gadolinium contrast was injected intravenously while rapid imaging
acquisition occurred. The contrast enhances the right ventricle first, then travels
through the pulmonary circulation, enters the left ventricle (LV), and then perfuses
the LV myocardium. Myocardial perfusion defects with this technique show as
black subendocardial rims, reflecting lack of contrast accumulation due to ischemia
and/or scar. In this case, the anterior wall has a severe perfusion defect (red arrow).
Figure 241-14 shows the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) image of a mid shortaxis view. There is no evidence of infarction in the anterior wall, which would be
seen as bright white areas, indicating that the stress perfusion defect primarily
represents myocardial ischemia. This patient had a significant stenosis of the left
anterior descending coronary artery.
VIDEO 241-8 This video shows the heart in long and short axis. Note the large atria,
thickened pericardium, and extensive pericardial adhesions. Given the extensive
pericardial adhesions, there is little shearing motion of the ventricles against the
parietal pericardium.
VIDEO 241-9 This video shows the heart in long axis with a four-chamber view.
The steady-state free precession (bright-blood) cine shows the early diastolic filling
bounce of the apical interventricular septum due to constrictive physiology.
VIDEO 241-6 A patient with severe aortic regurgitation quantified by cardiac
magnetic resonance (CMR). Notice the dark flow jet during diastolic across the
aortic valve. For quantitation of the aortic regurgitation severity, a cross-sectional
cut was made just below the aortic valve, perpendicular to the aortic regurgitation
jet, using phase contrast flow imaging. Apart from aortic regurgitation fraction and
volume, CMR also can volumetrically quantify ventricular sizes and dimensions of
the aorta, which are useful in monitoring patients with aortic valve diseases.
VIDEO 241-5 A 60-year-old female presented with intermittent chest pain of
3 days in duration but was pain-free at the time of assessment in the emergency
department. Admission electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrated T-wave inversion
in the anterior precordial lead, but cardiac enzymes were normal. A resting
cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) study reviewed a large area of anteroseptal
hypokinesia (left picture, region of hypokinesia shown by the red arrows), matching
with a large resting perfusion defect (middle picture, perfusion defect shown by the
blue arrows). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging (right picture), however,
did not show any enhancement to indicate any infarction in the anteroseptal wall,
suggesting that the hypocontractile and hypoperfused anteroseptal wall was viable.
Urgent coronary angiography demonstrated an acute thrombus in the mid left
anterior descending coronary artery, which required coronary stenting. This case
represents an example of acute coronary syndrome with hibernating but viable
myocardium in the anteroseptal wall. The anteroseptal wall recovered contractile
function when reassessed 6 months later.
VIDEO 241-3 Exercise echocardiogram showing rest images on left and poststress
images on right, with parasternal long-axis, upper panel, and apical four-chamber,
lower panel, end-systolic frames. Following exercise, the distal septal/apical region
becomes akinetic. A = upper left (UL); B = upper right (UR); C = lower left (LL); D =
lower right (LR).
VIDEO 241-7 These are T2*
images of the heart (left panel) and the liver (right
panel) of a patient who has hemochromatosis. Note that iron and the liver are
markedly darkened in these movies, indicating high load of iron in the heart muscle
and liver. The rate of signal reduction (decay) in the myocardium and liver can
be calculated as T2*
value expressed in milliseconds. In this case, the T2*
was at
10 ms. T2*
<20 ms in patients with cardiomyopathy has been shown to indicate iron
toxicity as the etiology of the cardiomyopathy, and it carries prognostic value for
such patients at risk of cardiac iron toxicity.
Diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography are
considered the gold standard in the assessment of the anatomy and
physiology of the heart and its associated vasculature. In 1929, Forssmann demonstrated the feasibility of cardiac catheterization in humans
when he passed a urological catheter from a vein in his arm to his
right atrium and documented the catheter’s position in the heart by
x-ray. In the 1940s, Cournand and Richards applied this technique
to patients with cardiovascular disease to evaluate cardiac function.
These three physicians were awarded the Nobel Prize in 1956. In 1958,
Sones inadvertently performed the first selective coronary angiography when a catheter in the left ventricle slipped back across the aortic
valve, engaged the right coronary artery, and power-injected 40 mL of
contrast down the vessel. The resulting angiogram provided superb
anatomic detail of the artery, and the patient suffered no adverse
effects. Sones went on to develop selective coronary catheters, which
were modified further by Judkins, who developed preformed catheters
and allowed coronary artery angiography to gain widespread use as
a diagnostic tool. In the United States, cardiac catheterization is the
second most common operative procedure, with more than 1.0 million
procedures performed annually.
CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION
■ INDICATIONS, RISKS, AND PREPROCEDURE
MANAGEMENT
Cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography are indicated to
evaluate the extent and severity of cardiac disease in symptomatic
patients and to determine if medical, surgical, or catheter-based interventions are warranted (Table 242-1). They are also used to exclude
severe disease in symptomatic patients with equivocal findings on noninvasive studies and in patients with chest-pain syndromes of unclear
etiology for whom a definitive diagnosis is necessary for management.
Cardiac catheterization is not mandatory prior to cardiac surgery in
some younger patients who have uncomplicated congenital or valvular
heart disease that is well defined by noninvasive imaging and who do
not have symptoms or risk factors that suggest concomitant coronary
artery disease.
The risks associated with elective cardiac catheterization are relatively low, with a reported risk of <0.1% for myocardial infarction,
0.01% for stroke, and 0.05% for death. For elective and emergent
procedures, the in-hospital mortality is 1.4%. These risks increase
substantially if the catheterization is performed emergently, during
acute myocardial infarction, or in hemodynamically unstable patients.
Additional risks of the procedure include tachy- or bradyarrhythmias
that require countershock or pharmacologic therapy, acute renal failure
leading to transient or permanent dialysis, vascular complications that
necessitate surgical repair or percutaneous intervention, and significant access-site bleeding. Of these risks, vascular access-site bleeding
is the most common complication, occurring in 1.5–2.0% of patients,
with major bleeding events associated with a worse short- and longterm outcome.
In patients who understand and accept the risks associated with
cardiac catheterization, there are no absolute contraindications when
the procedure is performed in anticipation of a life-saving intervention.
Relative contraindications do, however, exist; these include decompensated congestive heart failure; acute renal failure; severe chronic
renal insufficiency, unless dialysis is planned; bacteremia; acute stroke;
active gastrointestinal bleeding; excessive anticoagulation or recent
lytic administration; severe, uncorrected electrolyte abnormalities; a
242 Diagnostic Cardiac
Catheterization and
Coronary Angiography
Jane A. Leopold, David P. Faxon
1860 PART 6 Disorders of the Cardiovascular System
shock, pulmonary edema, and cardiorespiratory arrest. Patients with
a history of significant contrast allergy should be premedicated for at
least 24 hours prior to planned coronary angiography with corticosteroids and antihistamines (H1
-blockers) and studies performed with
nonionic, low-osmolar contrast agents that have a lower reported rate
of allergic reactions.
Contrast-induced acute kidney injury, defined as an increase in creatinine >0.5 mg/dL or 25% above baseline that occurs 48–72 h after contrast administration, occurs in ~2–7% of patients with rates of 20–30%
reported in high-risk patients, including those with diabetes mellitus,
congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, anemia, older age, or
who present with an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Dialysis is required in 0.3–0.7% of patients and is associated with a fivefold
increase in in-hospital mortality. For all patients, adequate intravascular
volume expansion with intravenous 0.9% saline (1.0–1.5 mL/kg per
hour) for 3–12 h before and continued 6–24 h after the procedure
limits the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury by >50%. Pretreatment with N-acetylcysteine (Mucomyst) has not reduced the risk
of contrast-induced acute kidney injury consistently and, therefore, is
no longer recommended routinely. Diabetic patients treated with metformin should stop the drug 24 h prior to the procedure and not restart
until 48 h after contrast administration to limit the associated risk of
lactic acidosis. Other strategies to decrease risk include the administration of sodium bicarbonate (3 mL/kg per hour) 1 h before and 6 h
after the procedure (similar outcome to saline infusion); use of low- or
iso-osmolar contrast agents; and limiting the volume of contrast to
<50 mL per procedure.
Cardiac catheterization is performed after the patient has fasted
for 6 h and has received intravenous conscious sedation to remain
awake but sedated during the procedure. All patients with suspected
coronary artery disease are pretreated with 325 mg aspirin. In patients
in whom the procedure is likely to progress to a percutaneous coronary intervention, an additional antiplatelet agent should be started:
clopidogrel (600-mg loading dose and 75 mg daily), prasugrel (60-mg
loading dose and 10 mg daily), or ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose and
90 mg twice daily). Prasugrel should not be selected for individuals
with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack and is not recommended
for patients 75 years of age or older. Warfarin is held starting 2–3 days
prior to the catheterization to allow the international normalized ratio
(INR) to fall to <1.7 and limit access-site bleeding complications. The
direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) should be stopped 24–48 h prior
to the test. Cardiac catheterization is a sterile procedure, so antibiotic
prophylaxis is not required.
■ TECHNIQUE
Cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography provide a detailed
hemodynamic and anatomic assessment of the heart and coronary
arteries. The selection of procedures is dependent on the patient’s
symptoms and clinical condition, with some direction provided by
noninvasive studies.
Vascular Access Cardiac catheterization procedures are performed
using a percutaneous technique to enter the femoral or radial artery
and femoral, brachial, or internal jugular vein as the access sites for
left and right heart catheterization, respectively. A flexible sheath is
inserted into the vessel over a guidewire, allowing diagnostic catheters
to be introduced into the vessel and advanced toward the heart using
fluoroscopic guidance. The radial artery (or rarely the brachial artery)
access site is advantageous in patients with peripheral arterial disease
that involves the abdominal aorta, iliac, or femoral vessels; severe iliac
artery tortuosity; morbid obesity; or preference for early postprocedure
ambulation. Use of radial artery access is the preferred access route
due to a lower rate of access-site bleeding complications and improved
patient comfort. A normal modified Allen’s test or Barbeau test confirming dual blood supply to the hand from the radial and ulnar arteries is recommended prior to access at this site. The internal jugular or
antecubital veins serve as the preferred access sites to the right heart
when the patient has an inferior vena cava filter in place or requires
prolonged hemodynamic monitoring.
TABLE 242-1 Indications for Cardiac Catheterization and
Coronary Angiography
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
Asymptomatic or Symptomatic
High risk for adverse outcome based on noninvasive testing
Sudden cardiac death
Sustained (>30 s) monomorphic ventricular tachycardia
Nonsustained (<30 s) polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
Symptomatic
Canadian Cardiology Society Class II, III, or IV stable angina on medical therapy
Acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation
myocardial infarction)
Chest-pain syndrome of unclear etiology and equivocal findings on
noninvasive tests
ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction
Reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Persistent or recurrent ischemia
Pulmonary edema and/or reduced ejection fraction
Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability
Risk stratification or positive stress test after acute myocardial infarction
Mechanical complications—mitral regurgitation, ventricular septal defect
Valvular Heart Disease
Suspected severe valve disease in symptomatic patients—dyspnea, angina,
heart failure, syncope
Infective endocarditis with need for cardiac surgery
Asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation and cardiac enlargement or ↓
ejection fraction
Prior to cardiac surgery or transcatheter aortic valve replacement or other
percutaneous valvular interventions in patients with suspected coronary artery
disease
Congestive Heart Failure
New-onset angina or suspected undiagnosed coronary artery disease
New-onset cardiomyopathy of uncertain cause or suspected to be due to
coronary artery disease
Congenital Heart Disease
Prior to surgical correction or percutaneous interventions, when symptoms or
noninvasive testing suggests coronary disease
Suspicion for congenital coronary anomalies
Pericardial Disease
Symptomatic patients with suspected cardiac tamponade or constrictive
pericarditis
Cardiac Transplantation
Preoperative and postsurgical evaluation
Other Conditions
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with angina
Diseases of the aorta when knowledge of coronary artery involvement is
necessary for management
history of an anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reaction to iodinated contrast
agents without premedication; and a history of allergy/anaphylaxis/
bronchospasm to aspirin in patients for whom progression to a percutaneous coronary intervention is likely and aspirin desensitization has
not been performed.
Contrast allergy and contrast-induced acute kidney injury merit
further consideration, because these adverse events may occur in
otherwise healthy individuals and prophylactic measures exist to
reduce risk. Allergic reactions to contrast agents occur in <5% of cases,
with severe anaphylactoid (clinically indistinguishable from anaphylaxis, but not mediated by an IgE mechanism) reactions occurring
in 0.1–0.2% of patients. Mild reactions manifest as nausea, vomiting,
and urticaria, while severe anaphylactoid reactions lead to hypotensive
Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization and Coronary Angiography
1861CHAPTER 242
Right Heart Catheterization This procedure measures pressures
in the right heart and pulmonary artery. Right heart catheterization
is no longer a routine part of diagnostic cardiac catheterization, but
it is reasonable in patients with unexplained dyspnea, pulmonary
hypertension, valvular heart disease, pericardial disease, right and/or
left ventricular dysfunction, congenital heart disease, and suspected
intracardiac shunts. Right heart catheterization most commonly uses
a balloon-tipped flotation catheter that is advanced sequentially to the
right atrium, right ventricle, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary wedge
position (as a surrogate for left atrial pressure) using fluoroscopic guidance; in each cardiac chamber, pressure is measured and blood samples
are obtained for oxygen saturation analysis to screen for intracardiac
shunts and calculate a cardiac output.
Left Heart Catheterization This procedure measures pressures
in the left heart as a determinant of left ventricular performance. With
the aid of fluoroscopy, a catheter is guided to the ascending aorta and
across the aortic valve into the left ventricle to provide a direct measure
of left ventricular pressure. In patients with a tilting-disc prosthetic
aortic valve, crossing the valve with a catheter is contraindicated, and
the left heart may be accessed via a transseptal technique from the right
atrium using a needle-tipped catheter to puncture the atrial septum
at the fossa ovalis. Once the catheter crosses from the right to the left
atrium, it can be advanced across the mitral valve to the left ventricle.
This technique is also used for mitral valvuloplasty. Heparin is given
for prolonged procedures to limit the risk of stroke from embolism
of clots that may form on the catheter. For patients with heparininduced thrombocytopenia, the direct thrombin inhibitors bivalirudin
(0.75 mg/kg bolus, 1.75 mg/kg per hour for the duration of the procedure) or argatroban (350 μg/kg bolus, 15 μg/kg per min for the duration of the procedure) may be used.
■ HEMODYNAMICS
A comprehensive hemodynamic assessment involves obtaining pressure measurements in the right and left heart and peripheral arterial
system and determining the cardiac output (Table 242-2). The shape
and magnitude of the pressure waveforms provide important diagnostic information; an example of normal pressure tracings is shown
in Fig. 242-1. In the absence of valvular heart disease, the atria and
ventricles are “one chamber” during diastole when the tricuspid
and mitral valves are open, whereas in systole, when the pulmonary
and aortic valves are open, the ventricles and their respective outflow
tracts are considered “one chamber.” These concepts form the basis
by which hemodynamic measurements are used to assess valvular
stenosis. When aortic stenosis is present, there is a systolic pressure
gradient between the left ventricle and the aorta; when mitral stenosis
is present, there is a diastolic pressure gradient between the pulmonary
capillary wedge (left atrial) pressure and the left ventricle (Fig. 242-2).
Hemodynamic measurements also discriminate between aortic stenosis and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy where the asymmetrically hypertrophied septum creates a dynamic intraventricular
pressure gradient during ventricular systole. The magnitude of this
obstruction is measured using an end-hole catheter positioned at the
left ventricular apex that is pulled back while recording pressure; once
the catheter has passed the septal obstruction and is positioned in the
apex of the left ventricle, a gradient can be measured between the left
ventricular apex and the aorta. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy is confirmed by the Brockenbrough-Braunwald sign: following
a premature ventricular contraction, there is an increase in the left
ventricular–aorta pressure gradient with a simultaneous decrease in
the aortic pulse pressure. The finding of a decrease in pulse pressure is
absent in aortic stenosis.
Regurgitant valvular lesions increase volume (and pressure) in the
“receiving” cardiac chamber. In severe mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, the increase in blood flow to the atria takes place during
ventricular systole, leading to an increase in the v wave (often two
times greater than the mean pressure). The size of the v wave is a
measure of the compliance of the left atrium but is not a reliable
measure of the severity of the mitral regurgitation. Severe aortic
regurgitation leads to a decrease in aortic diastolic pressure with a
concomitant rise in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, resulting in equalization of pressures between the two chambers at end
diastole.
Hemodynamic measurements are also used to differentiate between
cardiac tamponade, constrictive pericarditis, and restrictive cardiomyopathy (Table 242-3). In cardiac tamponade, right atrial pressure is
increased with a decreased or absent “y” descent, indicative of impaired
right atrial emptying in diastole, and there is diastolic equalization of
pressures in all cardiac chambers. In constrictive pericarditis, right
atrial pressure is elevated with a prominent “y” descent, indicating
rapid filling of the right ventricle during early diastole. A diastolic dip
and plateau, or “square root sign,” in the ventricular waveforms due
to an abrupt halt in ventricular filling during diastole, elevated right
ventricular and pulmonary artery pressures, and discordant pressure
changes in the right and left ventricles with inspiration (right ventricular systolic pressure increases while left ventricular systolic pressure
decreases) are observed. In the absence of constriction, the two ventricular pressures are concordant. The latter hemodynamic phenomenon
is the most specific for constriction. Restrictive cardiomyopathy may
be distinguished from constrictive pericarditis by a marked increase
in right ventricular and pulmonary artery systolic pressures (usually
>60 mmHg), a separation of the left and right ventricular diastolic
pressures by >5 mmHg (at baseline or with acute volume loading),
and concordant changes in left and right ventricular diastolic filling
pressures with inspiration (both increase).
Cardiac Output Cardiac output is measured by the Fick method or
the thermodilution technique. Typically, the Fick method and thermodilution technique are both performed during cardiac catheterization,
although the Fick method is considered more reliable in the presence of
tricuspid regurgitation and in low-output states. The Fick method uses
oxygen as the indicator substance and is based on the principle that
the amount of a substance taken up or released by an organ (oxygen
consumption) is equal to the product of its blood flow (cardiac output)
and the difference in the concentration of the substance in the arterial
TABLE 242-2 Normal Values for Hemodynamic Measurements
Pressures (mmHg)
Right atrium
Mean 0–5
a wave 1–7
v wave 1–7
Right ventricle
Peak systolic/end diastolic 17–32/1–7
Pulmonary artery
Peak systolic/end diastolic 17–32/1–7
Mean 9–19
Pulmonary capillary wedge (mean) 4–12
Left atrium
Mean 4–12
a wave 4–15
v wave 4–15
Left ventricle
Peak systolic/end diastolic 90–130/5–12
Aorta
Peak systolic/end diastolic 90–130/60–85
Mean 70–100
Resistances ([dyn-s]/cm5
)
Systemic vascular resistance 900–1400
Pulmonary vascular resistance 40–120
Oxygen Consumption Index ([L-min]/m2
) 115–140
Arteriovenous oxygen difference (vol %) 3.5–4.8
Cardiac index ([L-min]/m2
) 2.8–4.2
1862 PART 6 Disorders of the Cardiovascular System
mmHg
0
25
50
ECG
RA RV PA PCWP
FIGURE 242-1 Normal hemodynamic waveforms recorded during right heart catheterization. Atrial pressure
tracings have a characteristic “a” wave that reflects atrial contraction and a “v” wave that reflects pressure
changes in the atrium during ventricular systole. Ventricular pressure tracings have a low-pressure diastolic filling
period and a sharp rise in pressure that occurs during ventricular systole. d, diastole; PA, pulmonary artery; PCWP,
pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; s, systole.
mmHg
0
100
mmHg
0
200 50
25
ECG ECG
LV
Ao
Aortic
gradient
LV
PCW
Mitral
gradient
FIGURE 242-2 Severe aortic and mitral stenosis. Simultaneous recording of left ventricular (LV) and
aortic (Ao) pressure tracings demonstrates a 62-mmHg mean systolic gradient (shaded area) that
corresponds to an aortic valve area of 0.6 cm2
(left). Simultaneous recording of LV and pulmonary
capillary wedge (PCW) pressure tracings reveals a 14-mmHg mean diastolic gradient (shaded area)
that is consistent with critical mitral stenosis (mitral valve area = 0.5 cm2
). d, diastole; e, end diastole;
s, systole.
and venous circulation (arterial-venous oxygen difference). Thus, the
formula for calculating the Fick cardiac output is:
Cardiac output (L/min) = (oxygen consumption [mL/min])/
(arterial-venous oxygen difference [mL/L])
Oxygen consumption is estimated as 125 mL oxygen/minute × body
surface area, and the arterial-venous oxygen difference is determined
by first calculating the oxygen-carrying capacity of blood (hemoglobin
[g/100 mL] × 1.36 [mL oxygen/g hemoglobin] × 10) and multiplying
this product by the fractional oxygen saturation. The indicator dilution
method measures the concentration of a substance that is injected
proximally, adequately mixes with blood, and is then
sampled distally. In contemporary practice, thermodilution cardiac outputs are measured using temperature
as the indicator. Measurements are made with a thermistor-tipped catheter that detects temperature deviations
in the pulmonary artery after the injection of 10 mL of
room-temperature normal saline into the right atrium.
Vascular Resistance Resistance across the systemic
and pulmonary circulations is calculated by extrapolating from Ohm’s law of electrical resistance and is equal
to the mean pressure gradient divided by the mean flow
(cardiac output). Therefore, systemic vascular resistance
is ([mean aortic pressure − mean right atrial pressure]/
cardiac output) multiplied by 80 to convert the resistance from Wood units to dyn-s-cm−5. Similarly, the
pulmonary vascular resistance is ([mean pulmonary
artery − mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure]/
cardiac output) × 80. Pulmonary vascular resistance
is lowered by oxygen, nitroprusside, calcium channel
blockers, prostacyclin infusions, and inhaled nitric
oxide; these therapies may be administered during
catheterization to determine if increased pulmonary
vascular resistance is fixed or reversible.
Valve Area Hemodynamic data may also be used to
calculate the valve area using the Gorlin formula that
equates the area to the flow across the valve divided by
the pressure gradient between the cardiac chambers surrounding the valve. The formula for the assessment of
valve area is: Area = (cardiac output [cm3
/
min]/[systolic ejection period or diastolic
filling period][heart rate])/44.3 C × square
root of the pressure gradient, where C =
1 for aortic valve and 0.85 for the mitral
valve. A valve area of <1.0 cm2
and a mean
gradient of >40 mmHg indicate severe
aortic stenosis, while a valve area of <1.5
cm2
and a mean gradient >5–10 mmHg are
consistent with moderate-to-severe mitral
stenosis; in symptomatic patients with a
mitral valve area >1.5 cm2
, a mean gradient
>15 mmHg, pulmonary artery pressure
>60 mmHg, or a pulmonary artery wedge
pressure >25 mmHg after exercise is also
considered significant and may warrant
intervention. The modified Hakki formula
has also been used to estimate aortic valve
area. This formula calculates the valve area
as the cardiac output (L/min) divided by
the square root of the pressure gradient.
Aortic valve area calculations based on the
Gorlin formula are flow-dependent, and
therefore, for patients with low cardiac
outputs, it is imperative to determine if
a decreased valve area actually reflects a
fixed stenosis or is overestimated by a low
cardiac output and stroke volume that is
insufficient to open the valve leaflets fully. In these instances, cautious
hemodynamic manipulation using dobutamine to increase the cardiac
output and recalculation of the aortic valve area may be necessary.
Intracardiac Shunts In patients with congenital heart disease or
unexplained hypoxemia, detection, localization, and quantification
of the intracardiac shunt should be evaluated. A shunt should be suspected when there is unexplained arterial desaturation or increased
oxygen saturation of venous blood. A “step up” or increase in oxygen
content indicates the presence of a left-to-right shunt while a “step
down” indicates a right-to-left shunt. The shunt is localized by detecting a difference in oxygen saturation levels of 5–7% between adjacent
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع