clinical evaluatin'
! for the diagnosis of nongrscocca
bacterial arthritis.
Methods: Devew of t4 studies mehiling 6242
patients of which 653 had positive srnova: cu tire
(gold standard diagnostic tnol forseptx afnts).
Results:Age,diabetes nelStos.rbearztod
arthritis, jointsurgery, hip or knee prosthesis,sc r
infection, and human immunodeficiency erastype
t infection significantly increase the proPati ity of
septic arthritisJoint pain, history of joctswtfrg.
and fever are found m >50
*
of cases.The presence
ol inoeased WBC increasesthe Iiielzood rano for
counts <2SOOO/pL:W,0.32;95
*
a.0.23 0.43
for counts >25000/pL LR.2.9:95
*0.2J-3.4:foe
counts elOOOOOipL:IR.2B.0:95
*
0,C.0-66.C|.A
polymorphonuclear cell count of ?90
* mueasesoe
IR of septic arthritis hy 3.4.*
!e a PMI cel coat of
<90% reducestheLR by 0.34.
Conclusions Clinical findings may pe used a idem ’
patients with monoarticular arthritis who may
have septic arthritis,laboratory findingsfrom as
arthrocentesis are also required and helpful poor a
Oram stain and culture.
Table 7. Treatment of Osteomyelitis
Acute Osteomyelitis Chronic Osteomyelitis
IV antibiotics 4-6 wk:started empirically and adjusted alter obtaining Surgical debridement
blood and aspiratecultures
± surgery (liD)for abscess or significant involvement
* hardware removal(if present)
Antibiotics:both local(e.g.antibiotic beads) and systemic (IV)
Septic Arthritis
•joint infection with progressive destruction if left untreated
Etiology
•most commonly caused by S.aureus in adults
•consider coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in patients with prior joint replacement
•consider,V.gonorrhocac in sexually active adults, and newborns
•most common route of infection is hematogenous
•risk factors: young/elderly (age >80 yr), prosthetic joint, recent joint surgery,skin infection/ulcer,
IV drug use,recent intra-articular corticosteroid injection, immunocompromised (cancer, DM,
alcoholism,RA) +
Activate Windows
GtrtcrSettfng5To“
at?ivateJWmtfov
0R12 Orthopaedic Surgery Toronto Notes 2023
Clinical Features
• inability/refusal to hear weight, localized joint pain, erythema, warmth,swelling, pain on active and
passive ROM, ± fever Posterior Shoulder Dislocation
Up to 60-80% are missed on initial
presentation dueto poor physical exam
and radiographs
Investigations
• x-ray (to rule out fracture, tumour, metabolic bone disease), ESR,CRP, WBC, blood cultures
• joint aspirate: cloudy yellow fluid, WBC >50000 with >90% neutrophils, protein level >4.4 rng/dL,
joint glucose level <60% blood glucose level, no crystals, positive Gram stain results
• listen for heart murmur (if concern for infective endocarditis, use Duke Criteria)
There are 4Joints inthe Shoulder
Glenohumeral.AC.sternoclavicular (SC),
scapulothoradc
Treatment
• IV antibiotics, empiric therapy (based on age and risk factors), adjust following joint aspirate C&S
results
• non-operative
• therapeutic joint aspiration,serially if necessary
• operative
• arthroscopic or open irrigation and drainage
Shoulder passive ROM:abduction180°,adduction - 45°.flexion -180°.
extension - 45°.int rotation -level of
T4,ext.rotation -‘
90°likely more...
Shoulder
Factors Causing Shoulder Instability
, Shallow glenoid
• Loose capsule
• Ligamentous laxity
Frequency of Dislocations
. Anterior shoulder >Posterior
shoulder
• Posterior hip>Anterior hip
• The glenohumeral joint is the most
commonly dislocated joint in the
body since stability is sacrificed for
motion
Shoulder Dislocation
•complete loss of continuity between the two articular surfaces of the glenohumeral joint; may be
anterior or posterior
Investigations
- anterior dislocation x-rays: AP, trans-scapular, and axillary views ofthe shoulder
•posterior dislocation x-rays: AP, trans-scapular, and axillary views of the shoulder; orCT scan
Table 8. Anterior and Posterior Shoulder Dislocation
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation (>90%) Posterior Shoulder Dislocation(5%)
MECHANISM
Adducted,internally rotated,flexedarm
FOOSK
3Es (epilepticseizure. EtOH.electrocution)
Blow to anterior shoulder
Abducted externally rotated/hyperextended arm
Blow toposterior shoulder
Involuntary,usually Iraumalic; voluntary,atraumatic
CLINICAL FEATURES
Symptoms Pain,arm slightly abducted and externally rotated with
inability to internally rotate
Pain,arm is held in adduction and internal rotation;
externalrotation is blocked
"Squared off shoulder
Positiveapprehension test: palientlooks apprehensive
with gentle shoulder abduction and externalrotation to 90”
Positiveposterior apprehension (“jerk") test:with
as humeral head is pushed anteriorly and recreates feeling patientsupine.flex elbow 90° and adduct,internally
rotate the arm while applying a posterior force to the
shoulder;patient will“jerk* back with the sensation of
Anterior shoulder flattening,prominent coracoid,
palpable mass posterior to shoulder
Shoulder Exam
1.Manubrium
2.Sternoclavicular joint
3.Clavicle
4.Coracoid process
5.AC joint
6.Acromion
7.Humerus
8.Glenohumeral joint
,9.Scapula
Figure 9. Shoulder joints
of anterior dis'ocation
Positiverelocation test:a posteriorly directed force
applied durmgthe apprehension test relieves apprehension subluxaton
since anterior subluxation is prevented
Positivesulcus sign:presence of subacromial indentation recurrent posterior instability.NOT lor acute injury
with distal traction on humerus indicates inferior shoulder
Note:the posterior apprehension test is used to test for :
er
§
instability e
These tests are more commonly used for chronic recurrent
instability
Axillary nerve:sensory patch over deltoid and deltoid
contraction
Musculocutaneous nerve: sensory patch on lateral
forearm and biceps contraction
FullRenovascular exam as per anterior shoulder
dislocation
Neurovascular Exam
Including
Coracoid
V process
RADIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS
Axillary View
Trans scapular 'Y° View Humeral head is anterior to the center of the "MercedesBent"sign
Sub- coracoid lie of the humeral head is most common
Acromion
Humeral headis posterior /
Humeral headis posterior tocenter of "Mercedes-Bent*
Humeral head is anterior
sign 2
AP View Partial vacancy of glenoid fossa (vacant glenoid sign) and
>6 mm space between anterior glenoidrim and humeral
head (positive rim sign),humeral head may resemble a
lightbulb due to internal rotation (lightbulb sign)
tReverseHill-Sachs lesion (75% of cases):divot in
anterior humeral head
*Reverse bony Bankart lesion:avulsion of the posterior
glenoid labrum from the bony glenoid rim
r -t
I
_ L J
1_ Humcru Hill-Sachs and Bony
Bankart Lesions
? Hill-Sachs lesion:compression fractureof posterior
humeral head due to forceful impaction of ananteriorly
dislocated humeralhead against the glenoid rim
- Bony Bankart lesion:avulsion of the anterior glenoid
labrum (with attached bone fragments) from the glenoid
-
1
+ I
e
rim Figure 10. Mercedes-Benz
Activate Windows
GotoSsttfngsto activate'Windows.
OR13 Orthopaedic Surgery TorontoNotes 2023
Table 8. Anterior and Posterior Shoulder Dislocation Bankart
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation(>90%) Posterior Shoulder Dislocation (5%)
TREATMENT
Closed reduction withIV sedation and muscle relaxation
Traction-countertraction: assistant stabilizes torso with
a folded sheet wrapped across the chest while the surgeon
applies gentle steady traction
Stimson:while patient lies prone with arm hanging over
table edge,hang a 5 lb weight on wrist lor 15-20 min
Hippocratic method:place heel into patient’s axilla and
apply traction to arm
Cunningham'smethod:gentle longitudinal support
and traction of the arm at the patient's side,massage/
relaxation of deltoid,trapezius,and biceps to allow
atraumatic shoulder reduction,low-risk,low pain;if not
successful try above methods
Obtain post-reduction x-rays
Check post-reduction MVS
Sling x 3 wk (avoid abduction and external rotation),
followed by shoulder rehabilitation (dynamic stabilizer
strengthening)
Closed reduction with IV sedation and muscle relaxation
Interior traction on a Hexed elbow with pressure on the
back of the humeral head
Obtain post-reduction x-rays
Check post-reduction NVS
Sling in abduction and external rotation x 3 wk.
followed by shoulder rehabilitation [dynamic stabilizer
strengthening)
Hill-Sachs
Figure 11. Posterior view of anterior
dislocation causing Hill-Sachs and
Bankart lesions
Prognosis
• recurrence rate depends on age of first dislocation
• <20 yr 65-95%; 20-40 yr = 60-70%;>40 yr 2- 4%
Specific Complications
• recurrent dislocation (most common complication)
• unreduced dislocation
• shoulder stiffness
• rotator cuff or capsular or labral tear (Bankart/SLAP lesion)
• injury to axillary nerve/artery,brachial plexus
I
u->
§
I
-
-5 a
s
—«
r.
O
Antorior apprehension sign Sulcus sign
s
I
S sa i
s >-
5 4
e
Posterior apprehension sign Traction-countertraction
Figure 12. Shoulder maneuvers
+
Activate Windows
Go to Settings to activate Windows.
OR!l Orthopaedic Surgery Toronto Notes 2023
Supraspinatus
\ ligament
Acromion L
—
Rotator Cuff Disease
Coracoid
• rotator cuff consists of 4 muscles that act to stabilize the humeral head within the glenoid fossa process 4k
Table 9. Rotator Cuff Muscles (SITS)
Muscle Muscle Attachments Nerve Supply Muscle Function
Proximal Distal
Scapula Greater tuberosity ol
humerus
Greater tuberosity of
humerus
Greater tuberosity ol
humerus
lesser tuberosity of
humerus
Supraspinatus Suprascapular nerve Abduction
Infraspinatus Scapula Suprascapular nerve Eitemal rotation 1
--
Teres Minor Scapula Axillary nerve filernalrotation ASubscapularis I
-
Joint capsule
capular body j
Subscapularis Scapula Subscapular nerve Internal rotation and
adduction
Infraspinatus
Teres minor 5
SPECTRUM OF DISEASE: IMPINGEMENT. TENDONITIS, MICRO OR MACRO TEARS
Figure 13. Lateral view of the
muscles of the rotator cuff
Etiology
• narrowing ofsubacromial space
• most commonly due to a relative imbalance of rotator cuff and larger shoulder muscles,allowing for
superior translation and subsequent wear of the rotator cuff muscle tendons
• glenohumeral (rotator cuff) muscle weaknessleading to abnormal motion of humeral head
scapular muscle weakness leading to abnormal motion of acromion - poor posture
• acromial abnormalities,such as congenital narrow space or osteophyte formation or Type Ill
acromion morphology
1. outlet/subacromial impingement:
“
painful arc syndrome,” compression of rotator cuff
tendons (primarily supraspinatus) and subacromial bursa between the head of the humerus
and the undersurface of acromion, AC joint, and CA ligament
2. bursitis and tendonitis
3. rotator cuff thinning and tear if left untreated
Bigliani Classification of Acromion
Morphology
• Type I -flat
• Type II - curved
• Type III - hooked
Screening Out Rotator Cuff Tears
• No night pain (SN 87.7%)
• No painful arc (SN 97.5%)
• No impingementsigns(SN 97.2%)
• No weakness
Returning to the bedside;Using the
history and physical examination to
identify rotator cuff tears
J Am eeriatr Sac 2m«:K33-K37
Clinical Features
• insidious onset, but may present as an acute exacerbation of chronic disease, night pain,and difficulty
sleeping on affected side
• pain worsens with active motion (especially overhead); passive movement generally permitted
• weakness and loss of ROM, especially between 90-130°(e.g. trouble with overhead activities)
• tenderness to palpation over greater tuberosity
• rule out bicep tendinosis (Speed’s test) and SLAP lesions (O'
Brien’s test)
Investigations
• x-ray:AP view may show sclerosis of the undersurface of the acromion or greater tuberosity, high
riding humerus relative to glenoid, indicating large tear, evidence of chronic tendonitis
• MR1:coronal/sagittal, oblique, and axial orientations are useful for assessing full/partial tears and
tendinopathy ± arthrogram: geyser sign (injected dye leaks out of joint through rotator cuff tear)
• arthrogram: not commonly used but can assess full thicknesstears, difficult to assess partial tears
• ultrasound:may be a useful adjunct but limited ability to evaluate other intra-articular pathology
Treatment
• non-operative
first line treatment, rotator cuff injury treatment begins with physiotherapy (regardless ofseverity
on MR1 findings)
• physiotherapy, activity modification, non-narcotic analgesia ± steroid injection
• mild or moderate cases frequently improve
• progression to surgery if necessary
• operative
severe tear or impingement that is refractory to 2-3 mo physiotherapy and 1 -2 corticosteroid
injections
arthroscopic or open surgical repair (i.e. acromioplasty, rotator cuff repair)
Ruling in Rotator Cuff Tears-98%
probability of rotator cuff tear if all 3of
the following are present:
• Supraspinatus weakness
• External rotation weakness
• Positive impingementsign(s)
Diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.
Uriel 2001:357:765-770
Does thisPatient with Shoulder Faia have Rotator
Cull Disease’The Rational Clinical Euniaation
Systematic Review
JAMA 2013:310:837-847
Study: 5 studies of suficien:gcalty netd ‘
3
30-203 shouldersand a peeve e
*
te of ICO ranging
from 33-81%.
Results/Condosions: Jmong pan prpvocatiotesis, a positive pairfal ait test fad the gaetes:
specificity aid sensitnrty (SP 81%.SI 21%).Amrg
strength tests,a positveeftrael rotetion lag as:
and internal rotation lag as!were the nnstamiraa
fnr fidl-thicknesstears$P47%.SI 94%:SP 92%.
SH 83% respectively).The Menal rotation legtesJ
was therefore also the mast accs-aa far Meutdywg
patients without a ful-tticksess aar.
A positive drop arm test is helpful to ; dertify patients
with RCD (SN 24%. SP93%L
r T
L J
+
Activate Windows
"
GcrterSettmgrtcrsctTvate Windowsr
0R15 Orthopaedic Surgery Toronto Notes 2023
Table 10. Rotator Cuff Special Tests
Test Examination Positive Test
Supraspinatus:place the shoulder in90’of
adduction and 30’of horizontal flexion (from
the scapular plane) and internally rotate the
arm so that the thumb is pointing toward
the floor
Subscapularis:internally rotate arm so dorsal
surface of hand rests on lower back;patient
instructed to actively lift hand away from back
against examiner resistance (use Belly Press
Test if too painful)
Infraspinatus and teres minor;arm positioned
at patient's side in 90" of flexion:patient
instructed to externally rotate arm against the
resistance of the examiner
Rotator cuff impingement;passive shoulder
flexion
Rotator cuff impingement: shoulder flexion to
90’and passive internal rotation
Rotator cuff tendinopathy: patient instructed
to actively abduct the shoulder
Apply resistance to the forearm when the arm
is in forward flexion with the elbows fully
extended
SLAP lesion:forward flexion of the arm to
90’while keeping the arm extended.Arm is
adducted 10-15"
Internally rotate the arm so thumbis facing
down and apply a downward force.Repeat the
test with arm externally rotated
Jobe'
s Test (i.e.Empty Can Test) Weakness withactnre resistance suggests a
supraspinatustear
lift-off Test Inability to actively lift hand away from back
suggests a subscapularis tear
Posterior-Cuff Test Weakness withactive resistance suggests
posterior cuff tear
Pam elicited between130-170" suggests
impingement
Painwithinternalrotation suggests
impingement
Pain withabduction >90’suggests
tendinopathy
Pam in thebicipital groove
fleer's Test
Hawkins-Kennedy Test
Painful Arc Test
Speed's Test
O'Brien's Test Pain or clicking in the glenohumeral joint in
internalrotation but not externalrotation
r
\
)
/
Jobe s test Lift-off test Posterior cuff test
2
Neer's test s
r
-
Ur
£
130-170"
i
0
Hawkins-Kennedy test I
CM
1Z.
I
©
Figure 14. Rotator cuff tests
n
L J
+
Activate Windows
Go to Settingsto-acitvyLe Wtndovrt.
0R16 Orthopaedic Surgery Toronto Notes 2023
Acromioclavicular Joint Pathology
•subluxation or dislocation of AC joint
•2 main ligament groups attach clavicle to scapula: AC and CC ligaments
Mechanism
•fall onto shoulder with adducted arm or direct trauma to point of shoulder (usually fall onto the
posterosuperior aspect of the lateral shoulder)
Pneumothorax or pulmonary contusion
are potential complications of severe
clavicle fracture and rarely severe AC
joint dislocation
Clinical Features
•pain with adduction of shoulder and/or palpation over AC joint
•palpable step deformity between distal clavicle and acromion (with dislocation) i.e. piano key sign
•limited ROM
Investigations
•x-rays: bilateral AP, Zanca view (10-15° cephalic tilt), axillary
Treatment
•non-operative
sling 1-3 wk, ice, analgesia,early ROM, and rehabilitation
•operative
» indication: Rockwood Class IV-VI (111 if labourer or high level athlete)
• number of different approaches involving AC/CC ligament reconstruction or screw/hook plate
insertion
Table 11. Rockwood Classification of Acromioclavicular Joint Separation
Grade Features Treatment
I Joint sprain,absence of complete tear of eitherligament Non-operative
Complete tear of AC ligament,incomplete tear of CC Non-operative
ligament,without marked elevation oflateral clavicular
head
II
Complete tear of AC and CC ligaments,>5 mm elevation Most non-operative,operative iflabourer or high level
at AC joint,superior aspect of acromion is below the
inferior aspect of the clavicle
athlete
Will heal with step deformity,although most fully
funcbonalin 4-6 mo
Based on the anatomical structure the displaced clavicle Operative in most cases
is in proximity to (posterior,very superior,inferior)
IV-VI
Grade AC Ligament CC Ligament Reducible Treatment
I Sprained Normal N,A Non-operative
Non-operative
Most non-operative,
operativeif labourer or
high-level athlete
Will heal withstep
deformity.alLhough most
fully functional in 4-6 mo
Operativein mostcases
II lorn Sprained Yes
III lorn Torn Yes
IV-VI lorn Torn No
Rockwood separations IV-VI are determinedbased on direction ot displacement
IV:Distal clavicle displaced posteriorly into trapezius (seen on axillary XR)
V:Distal clavicle herniated through dellotrapezial fascia into subcutaneous tissue
VI:Distal davide displaced interior to acromion or coracoid under conjoined tendon (rare)
Opea iedictioiaidlitenalFiiati:a vs.
iMsirgicalTreataeitiiDisplacedMidshaft
Qavide Fradares:A Meta-dialysis
J(topIrac=a 203J2(7)a2)5-e2!3
Purpose:Compare c.icotes frpn DBF ard»-
eperane treaheeats aispacednd-shaft dander
fradires.
Methods Keta aa'ysisittSKIsreportag
xpuini
.toctxuai outcomes,and ssbsegoei:
surgeres patedsolderthasKyr.
Destlts: 9 ia:dp=zed ditaltrialsniI02)ata
patents iere ".ded.OJLF lasassocated•a
sgahcadly loaer toe®
*
rate ofLTV compared
toH5'
«
‘
or aeMt-ope-avre teat-ect gtozps (M
0.8.95% CL 0.0S-0-31).Fatctozal ooicaces.rated
by ether DASH or Coestadsetres.mere s 3 cScacty
betteritOlf gp to 6 wo.lieseidodegelectre
pate reoovaL derate ot szbsegsett szrger es«s
sgaScaatly loweri«ieODD cohort(Aftis.W%.
M0-36.95% C10.2A-0.5SL
Coidisiots OBf isassocatediisgtocao:
redochoos«ootswesaadeerier fsscboual
octtoses n dspaced -dstaftdatdi-fradres.
Clavicle Fracture
• incidence: proximal (5%), middle (80%), or distal (15%) third of clavicle
• common in children (unites rapidly without complications)
Mechanism
• fall on shoulder (87%), direct trauma to clavicle (7%),100SH (6%)
Clinical Features
• pain and tenting of skin
• arm is clasped to chest to splint shoulder and prevent movement
Investigations
• evaluate N VS of entire upper limb
• x-ray:AF, 45" cephalic tilt (superior/inferior displacement), 45° caudal tilt (AP displacement)
• Cl : useful for medial physeal fractures and sternoclavicular injury
+
Activate Windows
Goto JClli1
0R17 Orthopaedic Surgery Toronto Notes 2023
Treatment
• medial and middle-third clavicle fractures
• for nondisplaced fractures,simple sling for I -2 wk pm
early ROM and strengthening once pain subsides
» if fracture is shortened >2 cm, consider ORIF
• distal
-third clavicle fractures
• undisplaced (with ligaments intact):sling for 1-2 wk
• displaced (CC ligament injury):ORIF
Specific Complications (see General FractureComplications,OR7 )
• cosmetic bump (most common complication)
• shoulder stiffness, weakness with repetitive activity
• pneumothorax, brachial plexus injuries,and subclavian vessel (all very rare)
Associated Injuries with Clavicle
Fractures
• Up to 9% ol clavicle fractures are
associated with other fractures (most
commonly rib fractures)
• Majority of brachial plexus injuries
are associated with proximal third
fractures
Frozen Shoulder (Adhesive Capsulitis)
•disorder characterized by progressive pain and stiffness of the shoulder, usually resolving
spontaneously within 18 mo
Stages of Adhesive Capsulitis
1. Freezing phase:gradual onset,diffuse
pain (lasts 6-9mo)
2. Frozen phase:decreased ROM
impacts function (lasts 4-9 mo)
3. Thawing phase:gradual return of
motion (lasts 5-26 mo)
Mechanism
•primary adhesive capsulitis
idiopathic, often associated with DM
usually resolves spontaneously in 9-18 mo
•secondary adhesive capsulitis
• due to prolonged immobilization
• shoulder-hand syndrome:CRPS/RSD characterized by arm and shoulder pain, decreased motion,
and diffuse swelling
• following Ml,stroke,shoulder trauma
• poorer outcomes
Clinical Features ft
•gradual onset (weeks to months) of diffuse shoulder pain with:
• decreased active AND passive ROM
• pain worse at night and often preventssleeping on affected side
increased stiffness as pain subsides: continuesfor 6-12 mo after pain has disappeared
Conditions Associated with an
Increased Incidence of Adhesive
Capsulitis
• Prolonged immobilization (most
significant)
• Female gender
• Age >49
• DM (Sx)
• Cervical disc disease
• Hyperthyroidism
. Stroke
- Ml
• Trauma and surgery
• Autoimmune disease
Investigations
•x-ray:AP (neutral, internal/external rotation),scapular Y, and axillary views of the shoulder
may be normal, or may show demineralization from disease
Treatment
•freezing phase
maintenance of active and passive ROM (physiotherapy)
NSAlDs and steroid injections if limited by pain
•thawing phase
aggressive physiotherapy, possible manipulation under anesthesia and early physiotherapy
• arthroscopy for debridement/decompression
Humerus
Proximal Humeral Fracture
Mechanism
• young: high energy trauma (MVC)
• elderly: l
'
OOSH from standing height in osteoporotic individuals
Clinical Features
• proximal humeral tenderness, deformity with severe fracture,swelling, painful ROM, bruising
extends down arm and chest
• physical exam usually reveals diminished forward elevation, with or without disuse atrophy of deltoid
and periscapular musculature
Necr Classification
Based on 4 parts of humerus
• Greater tuberosity
• Lesser tuberosity
• Humeral head
- Shaft
One-part fracture: any of the 4 parts
withnone displaced
Two-part fracture:any of the 4 parts
with1displaced
Three-part fracture:displaced fracture
of surgical neck + displaced greater
tuberosity or lesser tuberosity
Four-part fracture:displaced fracture
of surgical neck + both tuberosities
n
L J
Investigations
• test axillary nerve function (deltoid contraction and skin over deltoid)
• x-rays:AP, trans-scapular, and axillary- views of the shoulder are essential
• CT’
scan:to evaluate for tuberosity or articular involvement and fracture displacement, and if the
diagnosis of non-union is unclear
+
Activate Windows
Go to Settings to activate Window:
OR18 Orthopaedic Surgery Toronto Notes 2023
Classification
• Neer classification is based on 4 fracture locations or‘parts'
• displaced: displacement >1 cm and/or angulation >45°
• the Neer system regards the number of displaced fractures, not the fracture line, in determining
classification
• ± dislocated/subluxed: humeral head dislocated/subluxcd from glenoid
Treatment
• assess for and treat osteoporosis if needed
• non-operative
nondisplaced and minimally displaced (85% of patients): broad arm sling immobilization, begin
ROM within 14 d to prevent stiffness
• most displaced fractures in low-demand elderly patients
• operative
• OR1F (anatomic neck fractures,displaced, associated irreducible glenohumeral joint dislocation)
or 1M nail (surgical neck)
hemiarthroplasty or reverse TSA may be necessary, especially in elderly
minimally invasive percutaneous pinning and intramedullary nail fixation are indicated in rare
instances
Specific Complications (seeGeneral FractureComplications,OR7)
• AVN, nerve palsy (45%; typically axillary nerve),malunion, post-traumatic arthritis, persistent pain
and weakness, frozen shoulder '
Greater tuberosity
Lesser tuberosity
Humeral Shaft Fracture v
11 Mechanism
• young: high energy trauma (direct blows/M VC)
• elderly: FOOSH, twisting injuries, mctastascs
Clinical Features
• pain,swelling, weakness ± shortening, motion/crepitus at fracture site
• must test radial nerve function before and after treatment: look for drop wrist,sensory impairment in
dorsum of hand
'Anatomical neck
Surgical neck
t 1
.
;
Investigations
• x-ray: AP and lateral views of the humerus, including the shoulder and elbow joints
Figure 15. Fractures of the proximal
Treatment humerus
• in general, humeralshaft fractures are treated non-operatively
• non-operative
± reduction; can accept deformity due to compensatory ROM ofshoulder
hanging cast (weight of arm in cast providestraction acrossfracture site) with collar and cuff
sling immobilization untilswelling subsides, then Sarmiento functional brace, followed by ROM
Acceptable Humeral Shaft Deformities
for Non-Operative Treatment
• <20° anterior angulation
• <30° varus angulation
•
<3cm of shortening
• operative
indications:see NO CAST sidebar,OR6, pathological fracture, “floating elbow” (simultaneous
unstable humeral and forearm fractures)
ORIF: plating (most common), IM rod insertion, external fixation (rare)
Specific Complications (seeGeneral Iracture Complications, OR7)
(§
>
• failure of functional bracing (seen in up to 30% of patients)
• radial nerve palsy: expect spontaneous recovery in 3-4 mo, otherwise send for EMli
• non-union: most frequently seen in middle 1/3
• decreased ROM
• compartment syndrome
Risk of radial nerve and brachial artery
Injury
Distal Humeral Fracture
The anterior humeral line refersto an
imaginary line drawn along the anterior
surface of the humeral cortex that
passesthrough the middle third of the
capitellum when extended interiorly.
In subtle supracondylar fractures, the
anterior humeral line is disrupted,
typically passing through the anterior
third of the capitellum
Mechanism
• young: high energy trauma (MVC)
• elderly:lower energy falls in patients with osteoporotic bone
Clinical Features
• elbow pain and swelling
• assess brachial artery (ecchymosis over anteromedial forearm issuggestive of brachial artery injury)
r T
L J
+
Activate Windows
<3cFto Settings to activate Windows
0R19 Orthopaedic Surgery Toronto Notes 2023
Investigations
• x-ray:AP and lateral views of the humerus and elbow
• Clscan:helpful when suspecting shear fracture of capitulum or trochlea, and for preoperative
planning
• assess NVS:radial, ulnar, and median nerve
Classification
• supracondylar, distal single column, distal bicolumnar, and coronal shear fractures
Treatment
• goal is to restore a functional ROM of at least 30-130°flexion (unsatisfactory outcomes in 25%)
• non-operative (paediatric patients and elderly patients with medical comorbidities)
cast immobilization (in supination for lateral condyle fracture; pronation for medial condyle
fractures):short immobilization and early range of motion
• operative
• indications: displaced,supracondylar, bicolumnar
• closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (children);OKU'
; total elbow arthroplasty (complex
bicolumnar in elderly)
adult fractures are almost always treated operatively due to risk of elbow stiffness with nonoperative management
Elbow
Supracondylar Fracture
•subclass of distal humerusfracture:extra-articular,fracture proximal to capitulum and trochlea,
usually transverse
•most common in paediatric population (peak age ~7 yr),rarely seen in adults
•AIN (median nerve) injury commonly associated with extension type
Mechanism
•>96% are extension injuries via 1
'
OOSH (e.g.fall off monkey bars); <4% are flexion injuries
Clinical Features
•pain,swelling, point tenderness
•neurovascular injury: median and radial nerves, radial artery
Three Joints at the Elbow
Humeroradial joint
Humeroulnar joint
Radioulnar joint
Normal carrying angle of elbow is ~10°
of valgus
Humera
Investigations
•x-ray: AR and lateral views of the elbow
disruption of anterior humeral line suggests supracondylar fracture
• fat pad sign: a sign of effusion and can be indicative of occult fracture
assess NVS:median and radial nerves, radial artery
Treatment
•non-operative
• nondisplaced (paediatric): closed reduction with long arm plaster slab in 90°flexion x 3 wk
•operative
• indications:see NO CAST sidebar, OR6; displaced >50%, vascular injury, open fracture
requires closed reduction plus percutaneous pinning followed by limb cast with elbow flexed <90°
in adults,OK1F is necessary
Specific Complications (see General Fracture Complications,OR7)
•stiffnessis most common
•brachial artery injury (kinking can occur if displaced fracture), median or ulnar nerve injury,
compartment syndrome (leads to Volkmann's ischemic contracture), malalignment cubitus varus
(distal fragment tilted into varus)
Figure 16. X-ray of transverse
displaced supracondylar fracture of
humerus with elbow dislocation
[/
Anterior Humeral Line
apitellum
Radio-Capitellar Line
• i
uv
-m
*
j
Radial Head
©Oasmond Ballance 2006
Figure 17. Lateral view of elbow
ri
L J
Capitellum moves posteriorly to the
anterior humeral line in extension type
fractures and anteriorly in fhxion type
fractures
+
Activate Windows
TSo to Settings to activate Windows,
OR20 Orthopaedic Surgery Toronto Notes 2023
Radial Head Fracture
• a common fracture of the upper limb in young adults (85% occur between 30-60 yr)
Mechanism
• FOOSH with elbow extended and forearm pronated
Clinical Features
• marked local tenderness on palpation over radial head (lateral elbow)
• decreased ROM at elbow, ± mechanical block to forearm pronation and supination
• pain on pronation/supination
Terrible Triad
Radial head fracture
Coronoid fracture
Elbow dislocation
Investigations
• x-ray:AF and lateral views of the elbow
• enlarged anterior fat pad ("sail sign”) or the presence of a posterior fat pad on lateral view
indicates effusion, which could occur with occult radial head fractures
Table 12. Classification and Treatment of Radial Head Fractures
Mason Class Radiographic Description Treatment
Elbow slab or sling x 3-5 d withearly ROM
ORIf if:angulation >30",involves >1/3 of Iheradial head,or if
>3 nun of joint incongruity exists,block to forearm rotation
Radial head excision t prosthesis (if ORIF not feasible)
Comminuted fracture with posterior elbow dislocation Radial head ORIF or radial head excision with prosthesis
Nondisplaced fracture (< 2 mm)
Displaced fracture|>2mm)
1
Figure 18.Lateral x-ray of elbow with
effusion (“sail sign”)
2
3 Comminuted fracture
4
To avoid stiffness,do not immobilize
elbow joint >2-3 wk
Treatment
the gold standard in management
• arthroscopic repair can be considered:offers improved visualization and enhances soft tissue
preservation of the joint
• ORIF remains
Specific Complications (seeGenera/ FractureComplications,OR7)
• myositis ossificans - calcification of muscle
• recurrent instability (if MCL injured and radial head excised)
Olecranon Fracture
Mechanism
• direct blow:fall onto point of elbow (posterior aspect)
• indirect blow:FOOSH (typically transverse/oblique fracture)
Clinical Features
• localized pain, palpable defect
• ± loss of active extension due to avulsion of triceps tendon
Investigations
• x-ray: AF and lateral (require true lateral to determine fracture pattern)
Treatment
• non-operative
• non-displaced (<2 mm,stable):cast x 2-3 wk (elbow in 90° flexion, often in full elbow extension),
then gentle ROM
• operative
displaced ± non-intact extensor mechanism
Elbow Dislocation
• third most common joint dislocation after shoulder and patella
• simple: dislocation with no associated features
• complex:dislocation with associate features (fracture along with anterior capsule and/or collateral
ligaments disrupted)
Mechanism
• elbow hyperextension via FOOSH or valgus/supinalion stress during elbow flexion
• usually the radius and ulna are dislocated together, alternatively the radial head dislocates in isolation
and the ulna is fractured (see Monteggia Fracture, OR22 )
• 80% are posterior/posterolateral, anterior are rare and usually devastating +
Activate Windows
Go to Settings to activate Windows.
0R21 Orthopaedic Surgery Toronto Notes 2023
Clinical Features
• elbow pain,swelling, deformity
• flexion contracture
• ± absent radial or ulnar pulses
Investigations
• x-ray: AP and lateral views of the elbow
• assess N VS:brachial artery, median and ulnar nerves
Elbow Dislocation
The radio-capitellar line refers to an
imaginary line along the longitudinal axis
of the radial neck that passesthrough
the centre of the capitellum, regardless
of the degree of elbow florion. If the
radio-capitellar line does not pass
through Ihe centre of the capitellum a
dislocation should be suspected
Treatment
• non-operative
• closed reduction under conscioussedation (post-reduction x-rays required)
• Parvin’s method: patient lies prone with arm hanging down; apply gentle traction downwards on
wrist; as olecranon slips distallv,gently lift up the arm at elbow to reduce joint
• long-arm splint with forearm in neutral rotation and elbow in 90° flexion
• early ROM (<2 wk)
• operative
• indications: complex fracture dislocation or persistent instabilitv after closed reduction
• OR1P
Specific Complications (see GeneralFractureComplications.UK7)
• stiffness (loss of extension),intra-articular loose body,neurovascular injury (ulnar nerve, median
nerve, brachial artery), radial head fracture
• recurrent instability uncommon
Epicondylitis
• lateral
the lateral
epicondylitis
epicondyle
= “tennis elbow,
” inflammation of the common extensor tendon as it insertsinto #
• medial epicondylitis = “golfer’
s elbow,
"
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع