topics

2/23/26

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: BRAF and MEK inhibition is a successful strategy in managing BRAF-mutant melanoma, even if the treatment-related toxicity is substantial. We analyzed the role of drug-drug interactions (DDI) on the toxicity profile of anti-BRAF/anti-MEK therapy.

METHODS: In this multicenter, observational, and retrospective study, DDIs were assessed using Drug-PIN software (V 2/23). The association between the Drug-PIN continuous score or the Drug-PIN traffic light and the occurrence of treatment-related toxicities and oncological outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS: In total, 177 patients with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma undergoing BRAF/MEK targeted therapy were included. All grade toxicity was registered in 79% of patients. Cardiovascular toxicities occurred in 31 patients (17.5%). Further, 94 (55.9%) patients had comorbidities requiring specific pharmacological treatments. The median Drug-PIN score significantly increased when the target combination was added to the patient's home therapy (p-value < 0.0001). Cardiovascular toxicity was significantly associated with the Drug-PIN score (p-value = 0.048). The Drug-PIN traffic light (p = 0.00821) and the Drug-PIN score (p = 0.0291) were seen to be significant predictors of cardiotoxicity. Patients with low-grade vs. high-grade interactions showed a better prognosis regarding overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0045) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.012). The survival analysis of the subgroup of patients with cardiological toxicity demonstrated that patients with low-grade vs. high-grade DDIs had better outcomes in terms of OS (p = 0.0012) and a trend toward significance in PFS (p = 0.068).

CONCLUSIONS: DDIs emerged as a critical issue for the risk of treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity. Our findings support the utility of DDI assessment in melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

PMID:37760556 | PMC:PMC10526382 | DOI:10.3390/cancers15184587

00:49

PubMed articles on: Cardio-Oncology

Promoter Optimization Circumvents Bcl-2 Transgene-Mediated Suppression of Lentiviral Vector Production

Biomolecules. 2023 Sep 16;13(9):1397. doi: 10.3390/biom13091397.

ABSTRACT

Lentiviral vectors are a robust gene delivery tool for inducing transgene expression in a variety of cells. They are well suited to facilitate the testing of therapeutic candidate genes in vitro, due to relative ease of packaging and ability to transduce dividing and non-dividing cells. Our goal was to identify a gene that could be delivered to the heart to protect against cancer-therapy-induced cardiotoxicity. We sought to generate a lentivirus construct with a ubiquitous CMV promoter driving expression of B-cell lymphocyte/leukemia 2 gene (Bcl-2), a potent anti-apoptotic gene. Contrary to our aim, overexpression of Bcl-2 induced cell death in the producer HEK293T cells, resulting in failure to produce usable vector titre. This was circumvented by exchanging the CMV promoter to the cardiac-specific NCX1 promoter, leading to the successful production of a lentiviral vector which could induce cardioprotective expression of Bcl-2. In conclusion, reduced expression of Bcl-2 driven by a weaker promoter improved vector yield, and led to the production of functional cardioprotective Bcl-2 in primary cardiomyocytes.

PMID:37759797 | PMC:PMC10526134 | DOI:10.3390/biom13091397

00:50

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Real-world data emulating randomized controlled trials of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism

BMC Med. 2023 Sep 29;21(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03069-1.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emulating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by real-world evidence (RWE) studies would benefit future clinical and regulatory decision-making by balancing the limitations of RCT. We aimed to evaluate whether the findings from RWE studies can support regulatory decisions derived from RCTs of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE).

METHODS: Five landmark trials (AMPLIFY, RE-COVER II, Hokusai-VTE, EINSTEIN-DVT, and EINSTEIN-PE) of NOACs were emulated using the South Korean nationwide claims database (January 2012 to August 2020). We applied an active comparator and new-user design to include patients who initiated oral anticoagulants within 28 days from their VTE diagnoses. The prespecified eligibility criteria, exposure (each NOAC, such as apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban), comparator (conventional therapy, defined as subcutaneous heparin followed by warfarin), and the definition of outcomes from RCTs were emulated as closely as possible in each separate emulation cohort. The primary outcome was identical to each trial, which was defined as recurrent VTE or VTE-related death. The safety outcome was major bleeding. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance 69 covariates between the exposure groups. Effect estimates for outcomes were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and Cox proportional hazards model and subsequently compared with the corresponding RCT estimates.

RESULTS: Compared to trial populations, real-world study populations were older (range: 63-69 years [RWE] vs. 54-59 years [RCT]), with more females (55-60.5% vs. 39-48.3%) and had a higher prevalence of active cancer (4.2-15.4% vs. 2.5-9.5%). The emulated estimates for effectiveness outcomes showed superior effectiveness of NOAC (AMPLIFY: relative risk 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.94; RE-COVER II: hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 0.37-0.96; Hokusai-VTE: 0.49, 0.31-0.78; EINSTEIN-DVT: 0.54, 0.33-0.89; EINSTEIN-PE: 0.50, 0.34-0.74), when contrasted with trials that showed non-inferiority. For safety outcomes, all emulations except for AMPLIFY and EINSTEIN-DVT yielded results consistent with their corresponding RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the feasibility of complementing RCTs with RWE studies by using claims data in patients with VTE. Future studies to consider the different demographic characteristics between RCT and RWE populations are needed.

PMID:37775786 | DOI:10.1186/s12916-023-03069-1

00:50

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

A case report: A patient rescued by VA-ECMO after cardiac arrest triggered by trigeminocardiac reflex after nasal surgery

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 29;102(39):e35226. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035226.

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Cardiac arrest (CA) caused by trigeminocardiac reflex (TCR) after endoscopic nasal surgery is rare. Hence, when a patient suffers from TCR induced CA in the recovery room, most doctors may not be able to find the cause in a short time, and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitation measures may not be effective. Providing circulatory assistance through venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can help healthcare providers gain time to identify the etiology and initiate symptom-specific treatment.

PATIENT CONCERNS: We report a rare case of CA after endoscopic nasal surgery treated with VA-ECMO.

DIAGNOSES: We excluded myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, allergies, hypoxia, and electrolyte abnormalities based on the relevant examination results. Following a multidisciplinary consultation, clinical manifestation and a review of previous literature, we reasoned that the CA was due to TCR.

INTERVENTIONS: VA-ECMO was established to resuscitate the patient successfully during effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OUTCOMES: ECMO was successfully evacuated a period of 190 minutes of therapy. The patient was discharged home on day 8.

LESSONS: TCR is notable during endoscopic nasal surgery. Our case indicates that CA in operating room is worth prolonged CCPR. The ideal time for ECPR implementation should not be limited within 20 minutes after CCPR.

PMID:37773828 | DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000035226

00:50

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis Adherence Rates After Major Cancer Surgery

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2335311. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35311.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major source of preventable morbidity and mortality and is a leading cause of death in the US after cancer surgery. Previous research demonstrated variability in VTE chemoprophylaxis prescribing, although it is unknown how these rates compare with performance in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

OBJECTIVE: To determine VTE rates after cancer surgery, as well as rates of inpatient and outpatient (posthospital discharge) chemoprophylaxis adherence within the VHA.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study within 101 hospitals of the VHA health system included patients aged 41 years or older without preexisting bleeding disorders or anticoagulation usage who underwent surgical treatment for cancer with general surgery, thoracic surgery, or urology between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022. The VHA Corporate Data Warehouse, Pharmacy Benefits Management database, and the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were used to identify eligible patients. Data analysis was conducted between January 2022 and July 2023.

EXPOSURES: Inpatient surgery for cancer with general surgery, thoracic surgery, or urology.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rates of postoperative VTE events within 30 days of surgery and VTE chemoprophylaxis adherence were determined. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to determine incidence-rate ratios of inpatient and postdischarge chemoprophylaxis adherence by surgical specialty.

RESULTS: Overall, 30 039 veterans (median [IQR] age, 67 [62-71] years; 29 386 men [97.8%]; 7771 African American or Black patients [25.9%]) who underwent surgery for cancer and were at highest risk for VTE were included. The overall postoperative VTE rate was 1.3% (385 patients) with 199 patients (0.7%) receiving a diagnosis during inpatient hospitalization and 186 patients (0.6%) receiving a diagnosis postdischarge. Inpatient chemoprophylaxis was ordered for 24 139 patients (80.4%). Inpatient chemoprophylaxis ordering rates were highest for patients who underwent procedures with general surgery (10 102 of 10 301 patients [98.1%]) and lowest for patients who underwent procedures with urology (11 471 of 17 089 patients [67.1%]). Overall, 3142 patients (10.5%) received postdischarge chemoprophylaxis, with notable variation by specialty.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings indicate the overall VTE rate after cancer surgery within the VHA is low, VHA inpatient chemoprophylaxis rates are high, and postdischarge VTE chemoprophylaxis prescribing is similar to that of non-VHA health systems. Specialty and procedure variation exists for chemoprophylaxis and may be justified given the low risks of overall and postdischarge VTE.

PMID:37768664 | PMC:PMC10539988 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35311

00:50

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

The Role of Injectables in the Treatment and Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 20;15(18):4640. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184640.

ABSTRACT

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a leading cause of death among patients with cancer. CAT can manifest itself as venous thromboembolism (VTE), in the form of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or arterial thromboembolism. The pathophysiology of CAT is complex and depends on cancer-, patient-, treatment- and biomarkers-related factors. Treatment of VTE in patients with cancer is complex and includes three major classes of anticoagulant agents: heparin and its derivatives, e.g., low molecular weight heparins, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and vitamin K inhibitors. Given the tremendous heterogeneity of clinical situations in patients with cancer and the challenges of CAT, there is no single universal treatment option for patients suffering from or at risk of CAT. Initial studies suggested that patients seemed to prefer an anticoagulant that would not interfere with their cancer treatment, suggesting the primacy of cancer over VTE, and favoring efficacy and safety over convenience of route of administration. Recent studies show that when the efficacy and safety aspects are similar, patients prefer the oral route of administration. Despite this, injectables are a valid option for many patients with cancer.

PMID:37760609 | PMC:PMC10526875 | DOI:10.3390/cancers15184640

00:50

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Oral Anticoagulants Beyond Warfarin

Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023 Sep 27. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-032823-122811. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have largely replaced vitamin K antagonists, mostly warfarin, for the main indications for oral anticoagulation, prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, and prevention of embolic stroke in atrial fibrillation. While DOACs offer practical, fixed-dose anticoagulation in many patients, specific restrictions or contraindications may apply. DOACs are not sufficiently effective in high-thrombotic risk conditions such as antiphospholipid syndrome and mechanical heart valves. Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis may benefit from DOACs, but the bleeding risk, particularly in those with gastrointestinal or urogenital tumors, must be carefully weighed. In patients with frailty, excess body weight, and/or moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, DOACs must be cautiously administered and may require laboratory monitoring. Reversal agents have been developed and approved for life-threatening bleeding. In addition, the clinical testing of potentially safer anticoagulants such as factor XI(a) inhibitors is important to further optimize anticoagulant therapy in an increasingly elderly and frail population worldwide. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Volume 64 is January 2024. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

PMID:37758192 | DOI:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-032823-122811

00:50

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

A New Risk Prediction Model for Venous Thromboembolism and Death in Ambulatory Lung Cancer Patients

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 15;15(18):4588. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184588.

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in ambulatory lung cancer patients during chemotherapy and is associated with increased mortality. (2) Methods: We analyzed 568 newly diagnosed metastatic lung cancer patients prospectively enrolled in the HYPERCAN study. Blood samples collected before chemotherapy were tested for thrombin generation (TG) and a panel of hemostatic biomarkers. The Khorana risk score (KRS), new-Vienna CATS, PROTECHT, and CONKO risk assessment models (RAMs) were applied. (3) Results: Within 6 months, the cumulative incidences of VTE and mortality were 12% and 29%, respectively. Patients with VTE showed significantly increased levels of D-dimer, FVIII, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, and TG. D-dimer and ECOG performance status were identified as independent risk factors for VTE and mortality by multivariable analysis and utilized to generate a risk score that provided a cumulative incidence of VTE of 6% vs. 25%, death of 19% vs. 55%, and in the low- vs. high-risk group, respectively (p < 0.001). While all published RAMs significantly stratified patients for risk of death, only the CATS and CONKO were able to stratify patients for VTE. (4) Conclusions: A new prediction model was generated to stratify lung cancer patients for VTE and mortality risk, where other published RAMs failed.

PMID:37760562 | PMC:PMC10527104 | DOI:10.3390/cancers15184588

00:50

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Management of Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice and Challenging Scenarios

J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 13;12(18):5955. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185955.

ABSTRACT

It is well established that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the cornerstone of anticoagulant strategy in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and should be preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) since they are superior or non-inferior to VKAs in reducing thromboembolic risk and are associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (IH). In addition, many factors, such as fewer pharmacokinetic interactions and less need for monitoring, contribute to the favor of this therapeutic strategy. Although DOACs represent a more suitable option, several issues should be considered in clinical practice, including drug-drug interactions (DDIs), switching to other antithrombotic therapies, preprocedural and postprocedural periods, and the use in patients with chronic renal and liver failure and in those with cancer. Furthermore, adherence to DOACs appears to remain suboptimal. This narrative review aims to provide a practical guide for DOAC prescription and address challenging scenarios.

PMID:37762897 | PMC:PMC10531873 | DOI:10.3390/jcm12185955