topics

11/16/25

ABSTRACT

Cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT) is a common, multifactor event known to complicate the course of cancer and jeopardize a patient's prognosis. The current guidelines regarding the prevention of CAT are sometimes considered insufficiently precise about specific situations, or are poorly applied. The expected benefits of thromboprophylaxis are balanced by the risk of major bleeding induced by anticoagulation, which implies a need to accurately identify ambulatory patients at high risk of thrombosis or hemorrhage. The Khorana score is commonly used for this, but is limited by the non-reproducibility of predicted performance across cancer types, and by the fact that antitumor treatment and cardiovascular risks are not included. The COMPASS-CAT score, which includes those two aspects, was found to be a more accurate predictor of venous thromboembolism in patients with lung cancer, and to better distinguish between patients at low or high risk of thrombosis. The frailty of patients with cancer is also a major issue, and should be taken into account when thromboprophylaxis is considered. According to current guidelines, CAT prophylaxis should be considered for hospitalized patients, those for whom surgery is scheduled, or those with pancreatic cancers. In ambulatory patients, decisions should be made according to patient, cancer and antitumoral treatment characteristics. Low molecular weight heparin is the gold standard of CAT prophylaxis. Despite increased risks of bleeding or drug-drug interactions in cancer patients, direct oral anticoagulants could be alternate options for high-risk ambulatory patients that should be accompanied by a careful global analysis of benefits, harms, and patient preferences.

PMID:37478777 | DOI:10.1016/j.retram.2023.103405

18:55

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Venous thromboembolism and breast cancer

Bull Cancer. 2023 Jul 18:S0007-4551(23)00296-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.06.001. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Patients with breast cancer have a 4-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to age- and sex-matched controls without cancer. VTE remains the second leading cause of death in cancer patients and an independent risk factor for mortality. In women with breast cancer, the main risk factors for developing VTE are increasing age, obesity, disease stage, central catheter placement and cancer treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, hormonotherapy and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. In women receiving tamoxifen, the risk of VTE is particularly increased within the first 6 months after initiation of hormonotherapy, although some evidence suggests that this risk may persist through the first 2 years of treatment. The risk of VTE appears to be lower in patients receiving aromatase inhibitors. In breast cancer patients receiving cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, the rate of VTE is approximately 6%. Current clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prevention of VTE in patients with cancer suggest that thromboprophylaxis should not be used routinely in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or hormonotherapy. The risk-benefit ratio of thromboprophylaxis should be assessed on a case-by-case basis and be the subject of multidisciplinary discussion.

PMID:37474353 | DOI:10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.06.001

18:55

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Risk of thromboembolic events in patients with metastatic solid tumors treated with PARP inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials

Cancer Treat Rev. 2023 Jul 17;119:102601. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102601. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND SCOPE: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have revolutionized cancer treatment in recent years. These drugs present a favorable safety profile, even though the potential risk of thromboembolic events (TEs) during their use has not been addressed yet. In addition, PARPi have been involved in an active scientific debate regarding non-oncologic indications, particularly during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic, including potential anti-thromboembolic effect.

METHODS: To clarify whether patients treated with PARPi for metastatic solid tumors are either at increased or decreased risk of TEs, we conducted a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, including all phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which investigated PARPi in this setting. Search was conducted through Medline, EMBASE, Pubmed, SCOPUS and Google Scholar in February 2023, including the proceedings of the principal oncology meetings of the last 10 years, with no time restriction. For each included study, frequencies of TEs in experimental and control arm were collected.

RESULTS: Our search identified 2,369 reports, of which 20 were lastly selected. A total of 4,946 patients were included, across 12 different RCTs. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate either an increased or a reduced risk in TEs in patients treated with PARPi for metastatic disease (OR 1.50, range: 1.00-2.24; 95% CI; P = 0.050), with low heterogeneity and low publication bias.

CONCLUSION: Although our research did not confirm either increased or decreased risk of TEs for PARPi use, no safety alerts emerged. Thromboembolic risk assessment models should always be integrated in daily clinical routine, to identify high-risk patients.

PMID:37473517 | DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102601

18:55

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients With Cancer-Associated Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis

J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul 20:JCO2300429. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00429. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) have lower rates of adverse outcomes (death, venous thromboembolism [VTE] recurrence or major bleeding) than those with proximal DVT. It is uncertain if such findings are also observed in patients with cancer.

METHODS: Using data from the international Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbolica venosa registry, we compared the risks of adverse outcomes at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]; 95% CI) and 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR; 95% CI]) in 886 patients with cancer-associated distal DVT versus 5,196 patients with cancer-associated proximal DVT and 5,974 patients with non-cancer-associated distal DVT.

RESULTS: More than 90% of patients in each group were treated with anticoagulants for at least 90 days. At 90 days, the adjusted risks of death, VTE recurrence, or major bleeding were lower in patients with non-cancer-associated distal DVT than in patients with cancer-associated distal DVT (reference): aOR = 0.16 (0.11-0.22), aOR = 0.34 (0.22-0.54), and aOR = 0.47 (0.27-0.80), respectively. The results were similar at 1-year follow-up: aHR = 0.12 (0.09-0.15), aHR = 0.39 (0.28-0.55), and aHR = 0.51 (0.32-0.82), respectively. Risks of death, VTE recurrence, and major bleeding were not statistically different between patients with cancer-associated proximal versus distal DVT, both at 90 days: aOR = 1.11 (0.91-1.36), aOR = 1.10 (0.76-1.62), and aOR = 1.18 (0.76-1.83), respectively, and 1 year: aHR = 1.01 (0.89-1.15), aHR = 1.02 (0.76-1.35), and aHR = 1.10 (0.76-1.61), respectively. However, more patients with cancer-associated proximal DVT, compared with cancer-associated distal DVT, developed fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) during follow-up: The risk difference was 0.40% (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.58).

CONCLUSION: Cancer-associated distal DVT has serious and relatively comparable outcomes compared with cancer-associated proximal DVT. The lower risk of fatal PE from cancer-associated distal DVT needs further investigation.

PMID:37471683 | DOI:10.1200/JCO.23.00429